Ancient system of town planning in india

ANCIENT SYSTEM OF
TOWN PLANNING IN INDIA

UNIT II

CT.Lakshmanan B.Arch., M.C.P.

TOPICS TO BE COVERED
 INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION
MOHENJADORO
HARAPPA
 EXTRACTS FROM CHANAKYA’S ARTHASASTRA
REGIONAL CONCEPTS
MANASARA VASTU SASTRA
8 TOWN PLANNING CONCEPTS
 PLANNING CONCEPTS BEHIND
FATEHPUR SIKHRI
SHAHJAHANABAD
JAIPUR
DELHI

INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION
 Also referred
to as
HARAPPAN
CIVILIZATION
&
HARAPPA SARASWATHI
SINDHU
CIVILIZATION
 Between
INDUS RIVER
MOHENJODARO AND THE
GHAGGAR-
HAKRA RIVER
[Pakistan and
North Western
India]

TOWN PLANNING CONCEPT
 SOPHISTICATED & ADVANCED URBAN CULTURE
 STREETS IN PERFECT GRID PATTERNS IN BOTH
MOHENJODORO & HARAPPA
 WORLD’S FIRST SANITATION SYSTEM
 INDIVIDUAL WELLS AND SEPARATE COVERED DRAINS
ALONG THE STREETS FOR WASTE WATER
 HOUSES OPENED TO INNER COURTYARDS & SMALLER
LANES
 IMPRESSIVE DOCKYARDS, GRANERIES, WAREHOUSES,
BRICK PLATFORMS & PROTECTIVE WALLS
 MASSIVE CITADELS PROTECTED THE CITY FROM FLOODS
& ATTACKERS
 CITY DWELLERS – TRADERS & ARTISANS
 ALL THE HOUSES HAD ACCESS TO WATER & DRAINAGE
FACILITIES

DEVELOPMENT OF CITIES
 CITIES GREW OUT OF EARLIER VILLAGES THAT
EXISTED IN THE SAME LOCALITY FOR < 100
YRS
 GREW IN SIZE & DENSITY AND SURROUNDED
BY NUMEROUS TOWNS & VILLAGES
 CITIES INTERLINKED BY TRADE & ECONOMIC
ACTIVITIES, RELEGIOUS BELIEFS, SOCIAL
RELATIONS,ETC
 VAST AGRICULTURAL LANDS, RIVERS &
FORESTS BY PASTORAL COMMUNITIES ,
FISHER FOLK AND HUNTERS SURROUNDED
EACH CITY

DEVELOPMENT OF CITIES
 CLASSIFICATION OF TOWNS
Small villages / hamlets – 0 – 10 hectares
Large towns – 10- 50 hectares
Cities – 50 hectares
IMPORTANT CITIES
CITY SIZE IN HECTARES POPULATION
MOHENJODARO 200 35-41000
HARAPPA 150 23500
GANWERIWALA 80
RAKHIGARHI 80
DHOLAVIRA 100
REHMAN DEHRI 22 12000

MOHENJODARO
 NO FORTIFICATION
 MAJOR STREETS IN
NORTH SOUTH
DIRECTION
 INTERSECTION AT
RIGHT ANGLES
 STREETS WITHIN
BUILT UP AREAS
WERE NARROW
 DISTINCT ZONING
FOR DIFFERENT
GROUPS

MOHENJODARO
SETTLEMENT
DIVISIONS
 RELEGIOUS,
INSTITUTIONAL &
CULTURAL AREAS –
AROUND
MONASTERY &
GREAT BATH IN THE
WESTERN PART
 NORTH –
AGRICULTURE &
INDUSTRIES
 SOUTH –
ADMINISTRATION,
TRADE &
COMMERCE

MOHENJODARO
CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
 BUILDINGS – MASONRY CONSTRUCTION BY
SUN DRIED BRICKS
 RANGING FROM 2 ROOMS TO MANSIONS
WITH MANY ROOMS
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE
FROM HOUSES
 HELICAL PUMPS FOR PUMPING WATER IN
GREAT BATH
 PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS – MONASTRY & BATH -
INDICATING RELIGIOUS CULTURE

MOHENJODARO
 12x7x3 M IN DIMENSIONS
 EARLIEST PUBLIC WATER TANK IN
GREAT BATH
ANCIENT WORLD
 LEDGE EXTENDS FOR THE ENTIRE
WIDTH OF POOL
 WATERTIGHT FLOOR – THICK LAYER OF
BITUMEN
 FLOOR SLOPES IN SOUTH WEST
CORNER WITH A SMALL OUTLET
CONNECTING TO A BRICK DRAIN
 ROOMS LOCATED IN THE EAST

MOHENJODARO
GRANARY
 50x40 M IN DIMENSION, 4.5 M TALL
 MASSIVE MUD BRICK FOUNDATION
 2 ROWS OF SIX ROOMS ALONG A CENTRAL PASSAGEWAY
[7M WIDE & PAVED WITH BAKED BRICKS]
 EACH ROOM 15.2x6.1 M HAS 3 STEEPER WALLS WITH
AIRSPACE BETWEEN
 A WOODEN SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPPORTED IN SOME
PLACES BY LARGE COLUMNS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT
ON TOP OF THE BRICK FOUNDATIONS, WITH STAIRS
LEADING UP FROM THE CENTRAL PASSAGE AREA.
 SMALL TRIANGULAR OPENIGS – AIR DUCTS FOR FRESH
AIR BENEATH HOLLOW FLOORS
 THE LARGE SIZE OF THE GRANARY PROBABLY INDICATES
A HIGHLY DEVELOPED AGRICULTURAL CIVILIZATION

Ancient system of town planning in india

HARAPPA
 23000 POPULATION
 150 HECTARES
 EARLIEST CITY MAY HAVE BEEN FORMED
DURING THE KOT DIJI PHASE, I.E., 2800-
2500 BC
 EARLIEST CITY COVERED AN AREA OF 25
HA.
 IT BECAME A CENTRE
FOR
TRADE NETWORKS EXTENDING HARAPPA
FROM BALUCHISTAN AND
AFGHANISTAN TO THE WEST OF
THE SEACOAST IN THE SOUTH.
RAISED MUD
 TOWNS BUILT OVER
BRICK PLATFORMS

HARAPPA
TOWN PLANNING
 CITADEL MOUND AND LOWER TOWN SURROUNDED BY A MASSIVE
BRICK WALL.
 CITADEL HAD SQUARE TOWERS AND BASTIONS.
 LARGE OPEN AREAS INSIDE THE GATEWAY MAY HAVE BEEN USED AS A
MARKET OR CHECKPOINT FOR TAXING GOODS COMING INTO THE CITY

 OUTSIDE THE CITY WALLS A CLUSTER OF HOUSES MAY REPRESENT
TEMPORARY REST STOPS FOR TRAVELLERS AND CARAVANS

 NO DIVISION OF THE SOCIETY IS REFLECTED IN THE LAYOUT OF
THE CITY. SINCE LARGE PUBLIC BUILDINGS, MARKET AREAS, LARGE
AND SMALL HOUSES AS WELL AS CRAFT WORKSHOPS HAVE BEEN
FOUND IN THE SAME NEIGHBOURHOOD.
 BARRACK-LIKE GROUP OF SINGLE-ROOMED TENEMENTS WERE
FOR THE POORER CLASSES

TOWN PLANNING
HARAPPA
 Basic house plans
 single room tenements
 houses with courtyards
 Houses - rooms on 3 sides opening into a central courtyard
 Nearly all large houses had private wells.
 Hearths ( brick- or stone-lined fireplace or oven often used for
cooking and/or heating) common in rooms.
 Bathrooms in every house with chutes leading to drainage channels.
 First floor bathrooms also built.
 Brick stairways provided access to the upper floors.
 Houses built with a perimeter wall and adjacent houses were
separated by a narrow space of land.
 Granary with areas for threshing grains.
 Burnt bricks mainly used for drains, wells and bathrooms.
 Sun dried bricks used mainly for fillings.
 Timber used for flat roofs and as frames or lacing for brickwork

ARCHITECTURE HARAPPA
 BUILDING MATERIALS - MUD BRICKS AND BAKED BRICKS, WOOD
AND REEDS.
 THE AVERAGE SIZE OF THE BRICKS WAS 7 X 12 X 34 CM (FOR HOUSES)
AND 10 X 20 X 40 CM FOR THE CITY WALLS. THE LARGER BRICKS HAVE
A STANDARD RATIO OF 1:2:4.
 MUD BRICK, BAKED BRICK & WOOD OR STONE WERE USED FOR THE
FOUNDATION AND WALLS OF THE HOUSES.
 THE DOORS ,WINDOWS WERE MADE FROM WOOD AND MAT.
 HOUSE FLOORS -HARD-PACKED EARTH
 BATHING AREAS AND DRAINS - BAKED BRICK AND STONE.
 ROOFS -WOODEN BEAMS COVERED WITH REEDS AND PACKED CLAY.
 LARGEST BUILDINGS MADE ENTIRELY OF WOOD.
 WINDOWS – SHUTTERS & LATTICE WORK

HARAPPA
ARCHITECTURE : LARGE PUBLIC STRUCTURES

 LARGE BUILDINGS -ADMINISTRATIVE OR RITUAL STRUCTURES.
 ACCESS ROUTES OR PROVIDED THOROUGHFARE FROM ONE
AREA TO ANOTHER.
 MARKETS AND PUBLIC MEETINGS HELD IN LARGE OPEN
COURTYARDS.
 HOUSES AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS GROUPED WITH SHARED
WALLS AND FORMED LARGER BLOCKS & ACCESSED BY WIDE
STREETS.
 MOST HOUSES HAD PRIVATE BATHS &TOILETS AS WELL AS
PRIVATE WELLS.

DRAINAGE SYSTEM HARAPPA
 WELLS AND RESERVOIRS - DRINKING AND BATHING.
 WELLS WERE LINED WITH SPECIALLY-MADE WEDGE-
SHAPED BRICKS TO FORM A STRUCTURALLY SOUND
CYLINDER.

 ROPES WERE USED TO LIFT THE WATER OUT, PROBABLY WITH
LEATHER OR WOODEN BUCKETS.
 SOME NEIGHBOURHOODS HAD COMMUNAL WELLS.

DRAINAGE SYSTEM HARAPPA
 BATHING PLATFORMS WITH WATER TIGHT FLOOR & DRAINS [OPEN
OUT TO LARGER DRAINS IN STREETS ] PROVIDED IN ROOMS ADJACENT
TO THE WELLS.
 DRAINS AND WATER CHUTES IN THE UPPER STOREYS WERE
OFTEN BUILT INSIDE THE WALL WITH AN EXIT OPENING JUST ABOVE
THE STREET DRAINS.
 TAPERED TERRACOTTA DRAINPIPES WERE USED TO DIRECT
WATER OUT TO THE STREET.
 MANY HOUSES HAD DISTINCT TOILETS, SEPARATE FROM THE BATH
AREAS.
 COMMODES WERE LARGE JARS OR SUMP POTS SUNK INTO THE
FLOORS AND MANY OF THEM CONTAINED A SMALL JAR.
 DRAINS COVERED WITH BAKED BRICKS OR DRESSED STONE
BLOCKS. GARBAGE BINS WERE PROVIDED ALONG THE MAJOR
STREETS.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATION
CHANAKYA’S ARTHASASTHRA
 CONGESTED TOWN, SHOULD BE FREED OF SURPLUS POPULATION, WHICH SHOULD
THEN BE HOUSED IN A NEW PLACE.

 TOWNS POSITIONED TO HELP EACH OTHER.
 ‘SANGRAHAN’ (COLLECTION REGISTER / TAX COLLECTOR) - 10 VILLAGES,
‘SARVATIK’ AMONG 200, ‘DRONAMUKH’ (CHIEF) AMONG 400 AND
‘STHANIYA’ AMONG 800
 MIGRATED PEOPLE IN NEW SETTLEMENT EXEMPTED FROM PAYMENT OF
TAXES FOR SOME YEARS.

 NEW VILLAGE –
 HIGHER PROPORTION OF AGRICULTURISTS AND SHUDRAS.
 MARKET - SALE OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM TRADERS ON HIGHWAYS.
 DAMS - CONSTRUCTED OVER RIVERS NALAS.
 TEMPLES AND GARDENS SHOULD BE PROVIDED.
 ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE AGED, THE CHILDREN AND INFORMAL PERSONS.
 CEREALS AND WEALTH WILL GROW IF THE AGRICULTURISTS ARE KEPT BUSY. ATTEMPTS SHOULD BE
MADE TO PROTECT AND INCREASE QUARRIES, FORESTS AND CANALS.

TOWN PLANNING
CHANAKYA’S ARTHASASTHRA
 A CITY - LOCATED CENTRALLY TO FACILITATE TRADE
AND COMMERCE.
 THE SITE - LARGE IN AREA, AND NEAR A PERENNIAL
DEPRESSED CLASS
WATER BODY .
 SHAPE - CIRCULAR, RECTANGULAR OR
FOREST,
SQUARE AS WOULD SUIT THE TOPOGRAPHY. FOREST
CEMETRIES
 SEPARATE AREAS FOR MARKETING GOODS

DIFFERENT GOODS.
 WALL AROUND THE TOWN, - 6 DANDAS HIGH AND TRADERS /
12 DANDAS WIDE. BEYOND THIS WALL THERE PALACE & SKILLED
SHOULD BE THREE MOATS OF 14‘, 12’AND
TEMPLES WORKERS
KSHATRIYAS
10’ WIDE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOUR ARM-LENGTHS
APART. DEPTH – 3/4TH OF WIDTH.

 THREE-EAST WEST AND THREE NORTH – PRIEST &
SOUTH ROADS, SHOULD DIVIDE THE TOWN. TREASURY /
MINISTERS
GOLDSMITHS
 THE MAIN ROADS SHOULD BE 8 DANDAS WIDE / INDUSTRIES
AND OTHER ROADS 4 DANDAS WIDE. / DOCTORS,/
ARTISTS
 1 WELL FOR 10 HOUSES.

ANCIENT TOWN CLASSIFICATION
 Dandaka
 Sarvathobhadra
 Nandyavarta
 Padmaka
 Swastika
 Prastara
 Karmuka
 Chaturmukha

Dandaka
 STREETS ARE STRAIGHT AND CROSS EACH
OTHER AT RIGHT ANGLES AT THE CENTRE
 VILLAGE HAS 4 GATES ON FOUR SIDES
 VILLAGE IS RECTANGULAR / SQUARE
 WIDTH OF THE STREET VARIES FROM ONE
- FIVE DANDA
 2 TRANSVERSE STREET AT THE
EXTREMITIES HAVE SINGLE ROW OF
HOUSES
 THE VILLAGE OFFICES LOCATED IN THE
EAST.
 THE FEMALE DEITY/ CHAMADEVATA -
LOCATED OUTSIDE THE VILLAGE AND THE
MALE DEITIES IN THE NORTHERN PORTION

SARVATOBHADRA
 This type of town plan is
applicable to larger villages
and towns, which have to be
constructed on a square sites.
 According to this plan, the
whole town should be fully
occupied by houses of various
descriptions and inhabited by
all classes of people.
 The temple dominates the
village

NANDYAVARTA
 This plan is commonly used
for the construction of towns
and not for villages.
 It is generally adopted for
the sites either circular or
square in shape, 3000 –
4000 HOUSES
 The streets run parallel to
the central adjoining streets
with the temple of the
presiding deity in the center
of the town.
 “Nandyavarta” is the name
of a flower, the form of
which is followed in this
layout.

PADMAKA
 This type of plan was
practiced for building of the
towns with fortress all
round.
 The pattern of the plan
resembles the petals of
lotus radiating outwards
from the center.
 The city used to be
practically an island
surrounded by water, having
no scope for expansion

SWASTIKA
 Swastika type of plan
contemplates some diagonal
streets dividing the site into
certain rectangular plots.
 The site need not be marked
out into a square or rectangle
and it may be of any shape.
 A rampart wall surrounds the
town, with a moat at its foot
filled with water.
 Two main streets cross each
other at the center, running
south to north and west to east.

PRASTARA
 The characteristic feature of
this plan is that the site may be
either square or rectangular
but not triangular or circular.
 The sites are set apart for the
poor, the middle class, the rich
and the very rich, the sizes of
the sites increasing according
to the capacity of each to
purchase or build upon.
 The main roads are much
wider compared to those of
other patterns.
 The town may or may not be
surrounded by a fort.

KARMUKA
 This plan is suitable for the place where the site of the
town is in the form of a bow or semi-circular or parabolic
and mostly applied for towns located on the seashore or
riverbanks.
 The main streets of the town run from north to south or
east to west and the cross streets run at right-angles to
them, dividing the whole area into blocks.
 The presiding deity, commonly a female deity, is installed
in the temple build in any convenient place.

CHATURMUKHA
 Chaturmukha type of plan
is applicable to all towns
starting from the largest
town to the smallest
village.
 The site may be either
square or rectangular
having four faces.
 The town is laid out east
to west lengthwise, with
four main streets.
 The temple of the
presiding deity will be
always at the center

Ancient system of town planning in india

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Ancient system of town planning in india (20)

More from ctlachu (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Ancient system of town planning in india