Student‐centred active learning 
approach in an online information 
  literacy credit course for PhD 
             students 
      Vilve Seiler, Kärt Miil, Krista Lepik 
      University of Tartu Library, Estonia

                Lilac 2012, Glasgow 
Overview
• Information literacy as a transferable skill in 
  doctoral curricula
• Context of the study – online information 
  literacy course “Introduction to information 
  research ”
• Methodology ‐ Content analysis of students’
  reflections and feedback
• Results of the study
University of Tartu 
    Founded in 1632
•   9 faculties and 4 colleges
•   70 bachelor’s, 80 master’s and 35 doctoral study 
    programmes
•   18,000 students (over 670 international students)
    More than 1 400 doctoral students 
•   Over 34 000 research publications (including 2 500 in 
    the Web of Science)


                 http://www.ut.ee/en/university/general
University of Tartu Library  

• Founded in 1802
• Collections of 3.5 million physical items
• Access to 22 000 e‐journals and 27 000 e‐
  books
• 51 000 registered users
• 2.6 million virtual visits
                   http://www.utlib.ee/en/
Information literacy 
                           online courses


• “Basics of  Information Literacy” for 
  bachelor’s and master’s students
• “Information literacy or why Google is not 
  enough” for gymnasium students
• “Introduction to information research” for 
  PhD students 
• Courses integrated info different subjects
Information literacy as a key 
                    competence in PhD 
                            programmes

• Information literacy as a transferable skill
• Information literacy as a university‐wide 
  elective subject  
Defining the needs


•   An e‐mail inquiry
•   Experience of subject librarians
•   Experience of other libraries
•   Situation at the university
Online course 
     Introduction to Information Research

•   Elective course for all doctoral curricula
•   3 ECTS credit points,  9 weeks
•   Since 2008, 70‐80 graduates every year 
•   Target group: PhD students of all faculties
•   Subject librarians as instructors
•   Individual tutoring and feedback 
Seiler Miil & Lepik - Student centred active learning approach in an online information literacy credit course for doctoral students
Content analysis of 
                    students’ reflections 

• Data derived from course reflections 
  provided by graduates 
• Qualitative content analysis as a method for 
  data analysis and interpretation
• Qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti
Teaching method 

• Student‐centred active learning 
• Individual assignments – information search 
  exercises on the topic of doctoral theses
• Analysis of fellow students’ exercises
• Individual feedback from subject librarians 
• Discussion forums as a contribution to the 
  learning community
Teaching method – students’
                                            opinions  
 I already had spent time in searching for literature in my field, but the 
  systematic approach of this course, and getting familiar with new 
  databases and reference management systems will surely make my 
  further searches more effective. 

 Without this course I would never have started to search in so many 
  different databases and I would never have learned  that there are 
  databases where I can find materials from the year 1774 and others that 
  contain articles published this year. 

 Within this course I performed searches in various databases, using 
  different search words and different methods. Such approach is very 
  important in order to understand the logic of databases and the 
  possibilities they offer. 
Course assignments

1.   Searching  in EBSCO and /or CSA Illumina databases.
2.   Exporting  search results into Refworks and EndNote Web, choosing  a
     reference manager for next assignments.
3.   Searching in other subject databases and e‐book databases, exporting 
     the references.
4.   Analysing of a fellow student’s 3rd exercise.
5.   Searching in Thomson Reuters WOS and in Scopus,  comparing the 
     databases, exporting  references.
6.   Searching in research repositories and scholarly search engines,
     exporting references.
7.   Analysing of a fellow student’s 6th exercise.
8.   Reflecting on the learning process,  presenting  a bibliography in the 
     chosen reference style.
Assignments –
                                         students’ opinions   

Assignments        Due to the exercises, I had to get thoroughly 
                    familiar with the advanced searches of different 
                    databases and, together with this, also to specify 
                    the actual content of my searches. 
                   I liked this course very much, especially the 
                    structure of exercises. Solving these problems 
                    gave me new knowledge, as well as skills and 
                    confidence.

Analysis of the    An interesting nuance of the course was the 
 works of           opportunity to evaluate and analyse the works of 
                    fellow doctoral students. I believe that it was 
fellow              beneficial for both the analysers and those whose 
 students           works were under examination. 
Questions for reflection


• Did you find new sources for your research?
• Was it useful to search a number of different 
  databases?
• Which databases will you keep checking up in the 
  future?
• The latter was rephrased in 2011: which 
  databases were the most useful for you?
Themes that emerged from 
                 the content analysis of the 
                                reflections 

•   Teaching method and assignments
•   Course organisation and learning process 
•   Usefulness of new knowledge
•   Previous knowledge of the learners 
•   Changes in attitudes and approaches 
•   Suggestions for further improvement of the 
    course 
Seiler Miil & Lepik - Student centred active learning approach in an online information literacy credit course for doctoral students
Different learners


• First year doctoral students
• Fourth year doctoral students
• Proceeded from master’s programme to doctoral 
  programme
• Graduated more than 10 years ago
• Teaching experience
• Different computer skills
• International students
Assessment of the course 
                                  and learning process

The course
The course has been built professionally. It gives basic knowledge to 
uninitiated and surely offers much to old hands as well.

Useful learning materials
Learning materials are compact and well explained.


Getting feedback
Patient tutoring, useful criticism, competent,  motivating.
Problems

•   Technical problems
•   Search in many different databases
•   Unclear instructions
•   Loss of motivation
•   Equal opportunities for foreign students
Difficult and 
                                                  time‐consuming
Difficult

I think that passing of this course was important for me, because I 
struggled with it a lot but I never felt like dropping out – it was too 
interesting.  

Time‐consuming

The nine weeks of this course were very taxing, but at the same time, 
very informative.

It could be said that information search is quite a time‐consuming 
activity. And you can decide only after having read the article whether 
your result was relevant.  
Tutors’ opinions about 
                                               the course 
Positive
 E‐learning is suitable for teaching 
 The course widened my own horizons
 Being useful to others makes you feel good
 The course has a positive effect on the quality of subject librarians’ work

Negative
 Time‐consuming
 I am worrying whether I can manage to teach searches on complex 
 subjects. 
 With time the work becomes a routine
 Working with badly motivated students 
 Unclear evaluation criteria
What is important for students 
                        in tutors’ opinion?
Positive
•Individual feedback
•Good learning materials
•All exercises are obligatory
•Analysing of the others’ work
•E‐learning is suitable for teaching this course

Negative
 •The first chapters are too theoretical 
Suggestions for changes from
                         tutors and learners 
Tutors
• Evaluation criteria should be clarified
• Contact seminars
• A separate theoretical exercise should be created

Learners
• Learning materials
• Proactive communication 

       ‘If you will translate those explanations from Estonian to 
     English, the course can be one of the most useful which I have 
                               attended.’
New knowledge and its advantages: 
                             practical search tips
Search tips
More general search tips are probably more important than 
introductions to individual databases 
More confidence
Thanks to the course I can more confidently and purposefully search 
for articles and research publications and I do not limit myself to surfing 
among thousands of Google results any more. 

Encouragement
This course created the so‐called Wow!‐effect – things can be done this 
way and I want to try it out. I mean, I learned about limiting my searches 
and combining search words, exporting different  records, etc. 
New knowledge and its advantages: 
                                 databases +
Databases + Google Scholar
                             Google Scholar
I prefer to combine the searches in EBSCO, ScienceDirect and Google 
Scholar
Search options on Google Scholar
The most surprising results can be retrieved with Google Scholar
searches, but due to its smaller number of search parameters, only 
experienced researchers can expect success here.

Everything in one and the same place
Ideally, only one database, containing all articles, would be the best, but 
I’m afraid that it is not realistic.
I was delighted because with Google Scholar, I can find e‐books, articles 
and other materials all in one and the same place.  
New knowledge and its advantages: 
                        reference managers

For me, the best surprises were RefWorks and EndNote Web – I 
had never heard about such possibilities.


I took much trouble with this assignment, downloading Write‐N‐
Cite III and mastering it. I needed help in adjusting my computer, but 
working with it later was truly enjoyable


I was finally able to make sense of article and reference 
management. So far, I had felt that it was very difficult to get a good 
idea about ongoing processes in the world of science. 
New knowledge and its 
                               advantages: added value

Overcoming of a ‘writer’s 
block’
I had just hit a wall when writing my article – I did not know where to look for 
source materials – and quite unexpectedly, this course gave me everything that 
I needed.
during information search I was able to  recapture my  already disappearing 
motivation. 

Joy in the search process 

I enjoy working with databases and I am pleased to see that I can 
find the articles that I need with little trouble and little amount of time. 
Earlier, I was more frustrated than motivated by article search. :D
Attitude towards information 
                                  literacy as a subject

Spreading of knowledge

RefWorks ja My EndNote Web proved to be the most useful tools. I had 
never before used these excellent new tools but now, I am even going to 
teach my colleagues to work with them.

I have already played a ‘missionary’ among my colleagues and 
acquaintances; very few of them knew about these tools and they 
generally used only some most common journal databases. Practically 
none of them had ever heard about the reference management system. 
The course should be made 
                                 obligatory!

 I introduced this course to my supervisor and suggested that 
  such a subject should be made obligatory. 

 Put this course in obligatory curriculum. It is very important 
  for all students to know how and where to find relevant 
  information for their thesis, articles, homework, etc.

 This course should/ought to be made obligatory for all 
  doctoral students and researchers (it would be good if all 
  lecturers passed such a subject‐based course too). 
I would have needed this 
                               course much earlier!
 The more I got used to working with databases, the more I was troubled 
  by the question WHY IS THIS COURSE NOT OFFERED EARLIER 
   THAN DURING DOCTORAL STUDIES? 

 I feel that I would have benefitted  more from this course if I had passed 
  it, for example, in my first year of master’s studies. This is the time when 
  students start to work with scientific articles more seriously. I would have 
  found many needed articles in a much easier way. 

 This subject should be taught much earlier, because doctoral students 
  have, as a rule, already done research and found suitable information 
  sources..
Previous knowledge
They used Google Scholar
 So far, I had search mostly with Google Scholar, but the results were quite 
 stretched. 
They did not use logical operators
I had never before used logical operators and had, when searching 
databases, quite often received a huge number of articles of varying 
relevance. 

They gained information from their supervisors
 My supervisor has a large collection of important articles, but they are 
 mostly printed on paper and already slightly outdated; thus, the selection 
 of materials is somewhat limited. 
 I received the articles that I needed from members of my research group.
Wow!
Get rid of old searching habits
 When performing searches, people are very often stuck with 
  their old habits.

Comparison with others
 … the feeling that Estonia is a backwater country where only 
  old and mouldy materials can be found is gradually lessening.

Discoveries
 I discovered that there is another, much larger globe inside 
  our globe. And the things that can be found there are not only 
  useful, but interesting as well. 
Thank you!

More Related Content

PDF
Embedded librarianship in academic health sciences programs cases from the fr...
PPTX
Engaging the reluctant - Phillips
PPTX
Session D - ACRLNEC-May-2012_0
PDF
Embedding links between teaching and research at a research intensive UK univ...
PPTX
Is there a statistically significant relationship between library resource ac...
PPTX
Research the researcher: informing the development of effective library resea...
PDF
Supporting Humanities Doctoral Student Success
PPTX
Ecer2014 mc cartney&marwick-st-researchengagement
Embedded librarianship in academic health sciences programs cases from the fr...
Engaging the reluctant - Phillips
Session D - ACRLNEC-May-2012_0
Embedding links between teaching and research at a research intensive UK univ...
Is there a statistically significant relationship between library resource ac...
Research the researcher: informing the development of effective library resea...
Supporting Humanities Doctoral Student Success
Ecer2014 mc cartney&marwick-st-researchengagement

What's hot (20)

PDF
Re-integrating the Library and the Classroom through a “Faculty Fellows” Project
PPTX
Sensemaking LS and DL
PDF
What actually happens: an ethnographic investigation of student library use -...
PPTX
What is pbl umt, 26-27 august 2014
PDF
Oxford - Making the link and seizing opportunities: the PGCert and my develop...
PPTX
Recent Findings from the OER Research Fellows
PPTX
Reading lists the good, the bad and the ugly
PPTX
The Teaching Excellence Framework: an opportunity for libraries to make an im...
PPTX
Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy, USNH ATI
PPTX
Head Start - Library-led innovation and collaboration enhancing the student e...
PPTX
Serving Patrons with Disabilities
PPT
Integrating information literacy within the university curriculum: cooperatio...
PPTX
Giving students a voice in Blackboard policy and practice development
PDF
EE for Parents
PPTX
Database teaching in different universities
PPTX
Inspiring collaboration: creative methods of co-teaching and embedding inform...
PDF
You can do it, We can help.
PPTX
Enriching the Academic Experience: the Library and Experiential Learning at M...
PPTX
Cohere 2014 comparing kinesiology-blended, online courses
Re-integrating the Library and the Classroom through a “Faculty Fellows” Project
Sensemaking LS and DL
What actually happens: an ethnographic investigation of student library use -...
What is pbl umt, 26-27 august 2014
Oxford - Making the link and seizing opportunities: the PGCert and my develop...
Recent Findings from the OER Research Fellows
Reading lists the good, the bad and the ugly
The Teaching Excellence Framework: an opportunity for libraries to make an im...
Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy, USNH ATI
Head Start - Library-led innovation and collaboration enhancing the student e...
Serving Patrons with Disabilities
Integrating information literacy within the university curriculum: cooperatio...
Giving students a voice in Blackboard policy and practice development
EE for Parents
Database teaching in different universities
Inspiring collaboration: creative methods of co-teaching and embedding inform...
You can do it, We can help.
Enriching the Academic Experience: the Library and Experiential Learning at M...
Cohere 2014 comparing kinesiology-blended, online courses
Ad

Similar to Seiler Miil & Lepik - Student centred active learning approach in an online information literacy credit course for doctoral students (20)

PPTX
Exploring the need - Kaye Towlson
PPT
Making it real : information literacy and student engagement. Authors: Ursula...
PPTX
Summon: The Path of Least Resistance
PPTX
What a difference a year makes! Elizabeth Newall
PPT
Assessing Information Literacy Skills
PPSX
Information Literacy Instruction: Ideas for Teaching College Students Essenti...
PDF
Talking 'pedagogy' for librarians: doing the PgC THE
PPTX
Information literacy at UR, workshop 1 2013
PPTX
Nazlin Bhimani - DARTS5 presentation
PDF
Critical friends: bringing teaching and learning support teams together to de...
PPT
Dual Credit: Skills That Transfer
PPTX
Convenient isn't always simple: Digital Visitors and Residents.
PPTX
Learning on the job or is that the library lab? Developing skills programmes ...
PDF
Bird - Bridging the gap between secondary and tertiary education: the role o...
PPT
Who? What? How?
PPTX
Evaluating a new electronic service using mixed methods
PPT
Integrating Inquiry: Student Centered Approaches for Inspiring Lifelong Lear...
PDF
Antonesa & McAvinia - Information literacy and the case of the ‘natives’
PPT
Prepped for University: introducing academic literacy skills to secondary sch...
PPT
Pagell Wuhan
Exploring the need - Kaye Towlson
Making it real : information literacy and student engagement. Authors: Ursula...
Summon: The Path of Least Resistance
What a difference a year makes! Elizabeth Newall
Assessing Information Literacy Skills
Information Literacy Instruction: Ideas for Teaching College Students Essenti...
Talking 'pedagogy' for librarians: doing the PgC THE
Information literacy at UR, workshop 1 2013
Nazlin Bhimani - DARTS5 presentation
Critical friends: bringing teaching and learning support teams together to de...
Dual Credit: Skills That Transfer
Convenient isn't always simple: Digital Visitors and Residents.
Learning on the job or is that the library lab? Developing skills programmes ...
Bird - Bridging the gap between secondary and tertiary education: the role o...
Who? What? How?
Evaluating a new electronic service using mixed methods
Integrating Inquiry: Student Centered Approaches for Inspiring Lifelong Lear...
Antonesa & McAvinia - Information literacy and the case of the ‘natives’
Prepped for University: introducing academic literacy skills to secondary sch...
Pagell Wuhan
Ad

More from IL Group (CILIP Information Literacy Group) (20)

PPTX
I can show you the (life) world: qualitative techniques to examine women’s in...
PPTX
Punk pedagogy and information literacy, Maria King
PPTX
UX for information literacy the use of diaries to explore information-seeking...
PPTX
Bridging the language gap building a shared understanding of information lite...
PDF
Developing creative research skills, Rosie Enys
PPTX
Informing bodies: embodied information literacy for conservatoire student sin...
PDF
Using LibGuides to engage students with reliable information in the run up to...
PPTX
Transforming academic support for incarcerated students: flipping the approac...
PPTX
Strengthening our research and teaching practice: a critical examination of i...
PDF
Riley: introducing a new information literacy chatbot prototype in evidence-b...
PPTX
LILAC Stories: exploring the long-term impact of the LILAC Conference on the ...
PPTX
Race across the library; demystifying the library space, Mark Ogden and Becky...
PPTX
Going grey: grey literature instructure in a graduate curriculum, Kathleen Ph...
PPTX
Strengthening our research and teaching practice: a critical examination of i...
PPTX
LibFest: critical information literacy and connected relations, Rosa Sadler, ...
PPTX
Clean stoves in India and Bill Gate’s chickens: re-imaging information litera...
PPTX
Show me! Seeing the campus through the eyes of international students and lea...
PDF
Nurturing the next generation of professionals: transformative peer-based stu...
PPTX
Punk pedagogy and information literacy, Maria King
PPTX
Shaping practice and identity exploring the interplay between workplace and t...
I can show you the (life) world: qualitative techniques to examine women’s in...
Punk pedagogy and information literacy, Maria King
UX for information literacy the use of diaries to explore information-seeking...
Bridging the language gap building a shared understanding of information lite...
Developing creative research skills, Rosie Enys
Informing bodies: embodied information literacy for conservatoire student sin...
Using LibGuides to engage students with reliable information in the run up to...
Transforming academic support for incarcerated students: flipping the approac...
Strengthening our research and teaching practice: a critical examination of i...
Riley: introducing a new information literacy chatbot prototype in evidence-b...
LILAC Stories: exploring the long-term impact of the LILAC Conference on the ...
Race across the library; demystifying the library space, Mark Ogden and Becky...
Going grey: grey literature instructure in a graduate curriculum, Kathleen Ph...
Strengthening our research and teaching practice: a critical examination of i...
LibFest: critical information literacy and connected relations, Rosa Sadler, ...
Clean stoves in India and Bill Gate’s chickens: re-imaging information litera...
Show me! Seeing the campus through the eyes of international students and lea...
Nurturing the next generation of professionals: transformative peer-based stu...
Punk pedagogy and information literacy, Maria King
Shaping practice and identity exploring the interplay between workplace and t...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
advance database management system book.pdf
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx

Seiler Miil & Lepik - Student centred active learning approach in an online information literacy credit course for doctoral students

  • 1. Student‐centred active learning  approach in an online information  literacy credit course for PhD  students  Vilve Seiler, Kärt Miil, Krista Lepik  University of Tartu Library, Estonia Lilac 2012, Glasgow 
  • 2. Overview • Information literacy as a transferable skill in  doctoral curricula • Context of the study – online information  literacy course “Introduction to information  research ” • Methodology ‐ Content analysis of students’ reflections and feedback • Results of the study
  • 3. University of Tartu  Founded in 1632 • 9 faculties and 4 colleges • 70 bachelor’s, 80 master’s and 35 doctoral study  programmes • 18,000 students (over 670 international students) More than 1 400 doctoral students  • Over 34 000 research publications (including 2 500 in  the Web of Science) http://www.ut.ee/en/university/general
  • 4. University of Tartu Library   • Founded in 1802 • Collections of 3.5 million physical items • Access to 22 000 e‐journals and 27 000 e‐ books • 51 000 registered users • 2.6 million virtual visits http://www.utlib.ee/en/
  • 5. Information literacy  online courses • “Basics of  Information Literacy” for  bachelor’s and master’s students • “Information literacy or why Google is not  enough” for gymnasium students • “Introduction to information research” for  PhD students  • Courses integrated info different subjects
  • 6. Information literacy as a key  competence in PhD  programmes • Information literacy as a transferable skill • Information literacy as a university‐wide  elective subject  
  • 7. Defining the needs • An e‐mail inquiry • Experience of subject librarians • Experience of other libraries • Situation at the university
  • 8. Online course  Introduction to Information Research • Elective course for all doctoral curricula • 3 ECTS credit points,  9 weeks • Since 2008, 70‐80 graduates every year  • Target group: PhD students of all faculties • Subject librarians as instructors • Individual tutoring and feedback 
  • 10. Content analysis of  students’ reflections  • Data derived from course reflections  provided by graduates  • Qualitative content analysis as a method for  data analysis and interpretation • Qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti
  • 11. Teaching method  • Student‐centred active learning  • Individual assignments – information search  exercises on the topic of doctoral theses • Analysis of fellow students’ exercises • Individual feedback from subject librarians  • Discussion forums as a contribution to the  learning community
  • 12. Teaching method – students’ opinions    I already had spent time in searching for literature in my field, but the  systematic approach of this course, and getting familiar with new  databases and reference management systems will surely make my  further searches more effective.   Without this course I would never have started to search in so many  different databases and I would never have learned  that there are  databases where I can find materials from the year 1774 and others that  contain articles published this year.   Within this course I performed searches in various databases, using  different search words and different methods. Such approach is very  important in order to understand the logic of databases and the  possibilities they offer. 
  • 13. Course assignments 1. Searching  in EBSCO and /or CSA Illumina databases. 2. Exporting  search results into Refworks and EndNote Web, choosing  a reference manager for next assignments. 3. Searching in other subject databases and e‐book databases, exporting  the references. 4. Analysing of a fellow student’s 3rd exercise. 5. Searching in Thomson Reuters WOS and in Scopus,  comparing the  databases, exporting  references. 6. Searching in research repositories and scholarly search engines, exporting references. 7. Analysing of a fellow student’s 6th exercise. 8. Reflecting on the learning process,  presenting  a bibliography in the  chosen reference style.
  • 14. Assignments – students’ opinions    Assignments  Due to the exercises, I had to get thoroughly  familiar with the advanced searches of different  databases and, together with this, also to specify  the actual content of my searches.   I liked this course very much, especially the  structure of exercises. Solving these problems  gave me new knowledge, as well as skills and  confidence. Analysis of the  An interesting nuance of the course was the  works of  opportunity to evaluate and analyse the works of  fellow doctoral students. I believe that it was  fellow beneficial for both the analysers and those whose  students works were under examination. 
  • 15. Questions for reflection • Did you find new sources for your research? • Was it useful to search a number of different  databases? • Which databases will you keep checking up in the  future? • The latter was rephrased in 2011: which  databases were the most useful for you?
  • 16. Themes that emerged from  the content analysis of the  reflections  • Teaching method and assignments • Course organisation and learning process  • Usefulness of new knowledge • Previous knowledge of the learners  • Changes in attitudes and approaches  • Suggestions for further improvement of the  course 
  • 18. Different learners • First year doctoral students • Fourth year doctoral students • Proceeded from master’s programme to doctoral  programme • Graduated more than 10 years ago • Teaching experience • Different computer skills • International students
  • 19. Assessment of the course  and learning process The course The course has been built professionally. It gives basic knowledge to  uninitiated and surely offers much to old hands as well. Useful learning materials Learning materials are compact and well explained. Getting feedback Patient tutoring, useful criticism, competent,  motivating.
  • 20. Problems • Technical problems • Search in many different databases • Unclear instructions • Loss of motivation • Equal opportunities for foreign students
  • 21. Difficult and  time‐consuming Difficult I think that passing of this course was important for me, because I  struggled with it a lot but I never felt like dropping out – it was too  interesting.   Time‐consuming The nine weeks of this course were very taxing, but at the same time,  very informative. It could be said that information search is quite a time‐consuming  activity. And you can decide only after having read the article whether  your result was relevant.  
  • 22. Tutors’ opinions about  the course  Positive E‐learning is suitable for teaching  The course widened my own horizons Being useful to others makes you feel good The course has a positive effect on the quality of subject librarians’ work Negative Time‐consuming I am worrying whether I can manage to teach searches on complex  subjects.  With time the work becomes a routine Working with badly motivated students  Unclear evaluation criteria
  • 23. What is important for students  in tutors’ opinion? Positive •Individual feedback •Good learning materials •All exercises are obligatory •Analysing of the others’ work •E‐learning is suitable for teaching this course Negative •The first chapters are too theoretical 
  • 24. Suggestions for changes from tutors and learners  Tutors • Evaluation criteria should be clarified • Contact seminars • A separate theoretical exercise should be created Learners • Learning materials • Proactive communication  ‘If you will translate those explanations from Estonian to  English, the course can be one of the most useful which I have  attended.’
  • 25. New knowledge and its advantages:  practical search tips Search tips More general search tips are probably more important than  introductions to individual databases  More confidence Thanks to the course I can more confidently and purposefully search  for articles and research publications and I do not limit myself to surfing  among thousands of Google results any more.  Encouragement This course created the so‐called Wow!‐effect – things can be done this  way and I want to try it out. I mean, I learned about limiting my searches  and combining search words, exporting different  records, etc. 
  • 26. New knowledge and its advantages:  databases + Databases + Google Scholar Google Scholar I prefer to combine the searches in EBSCO, ScienceDirect and Google  Scholar Search options on Google Scholar The most surprising results can be retrieved with Google Scholar searches, but due to its smaller number of search parameters, only  experienced researchers can expect success here. Everything in one and the same place Ideally, only one database, containing all articles, would be the best, but  I’m afraid that it is not realistic. I was delighted because with Google Scholar, I can find e‐books, articles  and other materials all in one and the same place.  
  • 27. New knowledge and its advantages:  reference managers For me, the best surprises were RefWorks and EndNote Web – I  had never heard about such possibilities. I took much trouble with this assignment, downloading Write‐N‐ Cite III and mastering it. I needed help in adjusting my computer, but  working with it later was truly enjoyable I was finally able to make sense of article and reference  management. So far, I had felt that it was very difficult to get a good  idea about ongoing processes in the world of science. 
  • 28. New knowledge and its  advantages: added value Overcoming of a ‘writer’s  block’ I had just hit a wall when writing my article – I did not know where to look for  source materials – and quite unexpectedly, this course gave me everything that  I needed. during information search I was able to  recapture my  already disappearing  motivation.  Joy in the search process  I enjoy working with databases and I am pleased to see that I can  find the articles that I need with little trouble and little amount of time.  Earlier, I was more frustrated than motivated by article search. :D
  • 29. Attitude towards information  literacy as a subject Spreading of knowledge RefWorks ja My EndNote Web proved to be the most useful tools. I had  never before used these excellent new tools but now, I am even going to  teach my colleagues to work with them. I have already played a ‘missionary’ among my colleagues and  acquaintances; very few of them knew about these tools and they  generally used only some most common journal databases. Practically  none of them had ever heard about the reference management system. 
  • 30. The course should be made  obligatory!  I introduced this course to my supervisor and suggested that  such a subject should be made obligatory.   Put this course in obligatory curriculum. It is very important  for all students to know how and where to find relevant  information for their thesis, articles, homework, etc.  This course should/ought to be made obligatory for all  doctoral students and researchers (it would be good if all  lecturers passed such a subject‐based course too). 
  • 31. I would have needed this  course much earlier!  The more I got used to working with databases, the more I was troubled  by the question WHY IS THIS COURSE NOT OFFERED EARLIER  THAN DURING DOCTORAL STUDIES?   I feel that I would have benefitted  more from this course if I had passed  it, for example, in my first year of master’s studies. This is the time when  students start to work with scientific articles more seriously. I would have  found many needed articles in a much easier way.   This subject should be taught much earlier, because doctoral students  have, as a rule, already done research and found suitable information  sources..
  • 32. Previous knowledge They used Google Scholar So far, I had search mostly with Google Scholar, but the results were quite  stretched.  They did not use logical operators I had never before used logical operators and had, when searching  databases, quite often received a huge number of articles of varying  relevance.  They gained information from their supervisors My supervisor has a large collection of important articles, but they are  mostly printed on paper and already slightly outdated; thus, the selection  of materials is somewhat limited.  I received the articles that I needed from members of my research group.
  • 33. Wow! Get rid of old searching habits  When performing searches, people are very often stuck with  their old habits. Comparison with others  … the feeling that Estonia is a backwater country where only  old and mouldy materials can be found is gradually lessening. Discoveries  I discovered that there is another, much larger globe inside  our globe. And the things that can be found there are not only  useful, but interesting as well.