2. PURPOSE
Assess functionality and effectiveness of local ADACs
Determine ADAC-initiated and/or -endorsed innovations and
best practices at all levels
Create an evaluation and assessment platform
Recognize the best, effective, and performing ADACs
3. COVERAGE
This policy shall cover:
●81 Provincial ADACs, 146 City ADACs,
and 1,488 Municipal ADACs which shall
be subjected to the performance audit.
5. CRITERIA
Organization of Local ADAC
Conduct of ADAC Meetings
Allocation of Funds for Anti-
illegal Drug Activites
Formulation and
Implementation of Plans
and Programs
Supervision & Support to
Component ADACs
Financial Support
Technical Support
Innovation/s
6. PREREQUISITES: TOOLS
Anti-Drug Abuse
Council-Functionality
Monitoring System
(ADAC-FMS)
an information system
used by encoders, auditors,
and regional managers for
the submission and
verification of Means of
Verification (MOVs) for
ADAC audit.
ADAC Performance
Audit Protocol
a document that
details the phases,
processes, and
timeline of the
conduct of the
performance audit.
ADAC Performance
Auditor Indicator
Reference
a document that
provides the indicators,
MOVs, point allocation,
and considerations
that measures the
functionality and
effectiveness of local
ADACs
7. PREREQUISITES:
AUDIT TEAM STRUCTURES AND COMPOSITIONS
ADAC Provincial Audit Teams
(APT)
● Organized by the DILG
Provincial Office
● Chaired by the DILG
Provincial Director or
representative
● Composed of
representatives from the
provincial PNP, PDEA, and
two (2) accredited CSOs
ADAC Regional Audit Teams
(ART)
● Organized by the DILG
Regional Office
● Chaired by the DILG
Regional Director or
representative
● Composed of
representatives from the
regional PNP, PDEA, and
two (2) accredited CSOs
ADAC National Audit Team
(ANT)
● Organized by the PADS DILG
in coordination with BLGS
and NBOO
● Chaired by the DILG
Secretary
● Composed of the heads of
DDB, PNP, PDEA, and one (1)
accredited CSO
8. PREREQUISITES: AUDIT MECHANISM
ADAC Provincial Audit
Teams (APT)
Shall audit all Component
Cities and Municipalities
within their respective
areas of jurisdiction
ADAC Regional Audit
Teams (ART)
Shall audit all Provinces,
Highly Urbanized Cities and
Independent Component
Cities within their
respective areas of
jurisdiction
ADAC National Audit
Team (ANT)
Shall conduct national
calibration and finalization
of results
10. LGU ADAC Focal
Persons to gather
all required MOVs
LGU ADAC Focal
Persons to endorse all
gathered MOVs to the
Local Chief Executives
for signature and
issuance of a
document containing
an Attestation
PHASE 1: DATA GATHERING AND UPLOADING PHASE
LCE to endorse the same
back to the LGU ADAC
focal persons for
encoding and uploading
in the ADAC- FMS.
Attestation executed by
the LCE should also be
uploaded
After uploading, e-
copies of all MOVs
shall be submitted
to the concerned
audit teams for the
process of
assessment
11. PHASE 2: AUDIT PHASE
The concerned DILG
Office shall convene
the APT, and ART to
conduct the audit
process.
The APT and ART shall
conduct the audit,
through ADAC-FMS,
based on MOVs
submitted/uploaded by
the LGU ADAC Focal
Persons.
After the conduct of the
audit, the APT and ART
shall generate the audit
report with
communicating results
through the ADAC-FMS, &
have it signed by the
members of the audit
team prior to re-
uploading the same.
12. All Provincial and
Regional reports
submitted to ANT
through the
PADS-PMO shall
be treated as
valid and final.
PADS-PMO shall
consolidate the
submitted reports
and endorse to ANT
in preparation for
the calibration, &
finalization of audit
results
PHASE 3: SUBMISSION OF AUDIT RESULTS
All Audit teams shall
submit their audit
reports in electronic
copy
13. PHASE 4: AUDIT RESULTS CALIBRATION & FINALIZATION
Convening of the
ANT to conduct
the calibration
and finalization
of audit results
PADS-PMO shall
generate the
National
Reporting Form
(NRF) using the
ADAC-FMS
14. NRF shall be
presented to SILG,
and once approved,
shall be declared as
valid and final
PHASE 5: PRESENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND
NON-FUNCTIONAL ADACS
ART and APT may opt to
conduct exit conferences
or similar activities with
their respective Local
Government Units to
discuss the results of the
performance audit
15. PHASE 5: PRESENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND
NON-FUNCTIONAL ADACS
Adjectival Rating of Functionality – The adjectival rating of ADAC performance and
functionality are as follows:
Audit Score Adjectival Rating
85-100 High Functional
51-84 Moderate Functional
50 and below Low Functional
17. ELIGIBILITY
● An ADAC may only be eligible for
awards if it garners an overall
performance score in the
functionality audit of 100
points (High Functional).
● The LGU should not have any
seriously affected barangays
● The LGU will undergo a test of
integrity
18. ASSESSMENT PROCESS
● The ADAC National Audit Team (ANT) shall be
convened to conduct the awarding assessment
for purposes of awards.
● The ANT shall use the National Report Form
(NRF) for the assessment process.
● The ANT shall use the data of the PDEA (Drug
Clearing and Drug Affectation) and the DILG -
NBOO (BADAC Functionality).
19. IDENTIFICATION OF
PASSING RATE AND
AWARDEES
Based on the awarding criteria, ADACs
who garnered 80 points during the
assessment process shall be recognized
and awarded.
A final list of all best and effective
ADACs shall be prepared based on the
awarding criteria. Said list, shall be
endorsed to the SILG for presentation,
and approval.
PRESENTATION OF
RESULTS
20. AWARDING
An awarding ceremony shall be scheduled and conducted to recognize
and incentivize the best performing or most effective / outstanding
ADACs.
