SlideShare a Scribd company logo
IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSR-JAGG)
e-ISSN: 2321–0990, p-ISSN: 2321–0982.Volume 3, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 75-82
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 75 | Page
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie
Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Usifo A.G.1
, Adeola A.J.1
, Babafemi E. M.2
, and Akinnawo O. O.1
1
(Department of Physical and Earth Sciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Crawford University,
Nigeria)
2
(Skangix Development Limited, Chevy View Estate, Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria)
Abstract: This research involved the use of 1-D electrical resistivity survey method for groundwater
investigation in Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State. Seven (7) vertical electrical resistivity soundings (VES) using
Schlumberger array were carried out at different locations. The Schlumberger resistivity soundings were
executed with half-spacing in the range of 1.00 – 100.00 metres. The curve types are AAK, AAK, KHAK, AKQ,
KQH, AK. The study shows that viable aquifer is within 17.30 – 52.90 metres square.
Keywords: Aquifer, Curves types, Electrical resistivity, Groundwater, Vertical Electrical Sounding.
I. Introduction
Groundwater is one of the most important natural resources. It is normally used to augment the supplies
from surface sources and sometimes it is the main source of water supplies [1]. To harness groundwater for
domestic and industrial usage usually require the drilling of boreholes which is quite expensive and is prone to
failure when there is no prior knowledge of the sub surface geology, hence the need for thorough geophysical
stu dies.
The VES method is a depth sounding galvanic method and has proved very useful in groundwater
studies due to simplicity and reliability of the method. The electrical resistivity of rock is a property which
depends on lithology and fluid contents. The ultimate objective of VES at some locality is to obtain a true
resistivity log similar to the induction log of a well at the locality, without actually drilling the well [2]. In this
study, the electrical resistivity method, i.e. the VES technique was used to delineate the different subsurface
geoelectric layers, the aquifer units and their hydrogeologic properties.
11. HEADINGS
1. Introduction
2. Indentations and Equations
2.1. Physical and geological setting of the study area
2.2 Methodology
3. Figures and Tables
4. Conclusion
5. Acknowledgements
II. Identations And Equations
2.1. Physical and geological setting of the study area
Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State is situated within longitudes N060
30/
00 and N060
70/
00 and latitudes
E0030
04/
00.00//
and E0030
04/
51.00//
. In Adodo/Ota local Government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria (Figure1).The
study area forms part of the Dahomey (Benin) basin, a very extensive sedimentary basin on the continental
margin of the Gulf of Guinea, which extends from the Volta River Delta. South-eastern Ghana in the West, to
the western flank of the Niger Delta [3, 4]. This formation known as coastal plain sand is made of poorly
sorted sands which are in parts cross-bedded and shows transitional to continental characteristics like Ilaro and
Abeokuta formations. The thickness of the coastal plain sand ranges from 10m to 100m while the ages fall
under Pleistocene and Oligocene [5]. Despite several published works on the stratigraphic units particularly in
the Palaeogene of South-western Nigeria.
The sedimentary basin in the Southern Nigeria is particularly divided into Western and Eastern portions by
the Okitipupa ridge a submarine basement whose outcrop approaches 40km of the coast at about 40
30/
E. In the
Western part of the basin, sedimentation did not begin until the terminal stages of the cretaceous whereas; the
earliest transgression in the Eastern part was during the Albian. Tertiary sediments accumulated in the eastern
half of an extensive Mesozoic-cenozoic coastal basin which extends from Ghana in the west to Cameroun in the
east. Marked variations existed in the texture and thickness of about 10,000 to 12, 000
metres beneath the shelf of the Niger Delta [6].
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 76 | Page
The Paleocene sea covers the Southern Nigeria extending entire westward to Republics of Benin and
Togo. The Palaocene deposits are characterized by extremely rapid lateral faces changes. In the eastern Nigeria,
the strata are large, composed of dark grey, thinly laminated friable Imo shale with occasional admixture of clay
ironstone and sandstone beds. To the west, biogenic limestone of the Ewekoro formation are found in the
lower part of the Palaeocene section [5]. The Palaeocene deposits in Western Nigeria were attended by local
crustal elevation which resulted in extensive erosion of the upper units of limestone. Glauconitic shale and
Phosphatic materials accumulated on the surface of the limestone.
III. Methodology
Vertical Electrical Soundings (VES) were carried out in the study area with an ABEM TERRAMETER
SAS (Signal Averaging System) 300B with booster SAS 2000 manufactured in Sweden was used for taking
surface resistivity readings. The equipment is light and powerful for deep penetrations. When the distance
between the two current electrodes is finite (Fig. 2), the potential at any nearby surface point will be affected by
both current electrodes.
As before, the potential due to C1 at P1 is
1
1 1
1 2
aIA
V where A
r

 

Because the currents at the two electrodes are equal and opposite in direction, the potential due to C2 at P1 is
2
2 2 1
2 2
aIA
V where A A
r

   

Thus, we have
1 2
1 2
1 1
2
aI
V V
r r
  
   
  
Finally, by introducing a second potential electrode at P2 we can measure the difference in potential
between P1 and P2 which will be
1 2 3 4
1 1 1 1
2
aI
V
r r r r
     
       
      
. (1)
Such an arrangement corresponds to the four electrode spreads normally used in resistivity field work. The
end result of the field measurement is the computation of the apparent resistivity, using the equation
KR
I
KV
a  (2)
where



























2
222
22
MN
MNAB
K (3)
and
a = Apparent Resistivity
K = Geometric factor
V = Volt; I = Current;
R = Resistance
AB = Current Electrodes Separation
MN = Potential Electrodes Separation.
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 77 | Page
IV. Figures And Tables
Figure 1: map of ketu - adie owe and environs.
Figure 2: two current and two potential electrodes on the surface of heterogeneous ground of app. resistivity a
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 78 | Page
Figure 3: field and theoretical curves for VES 1
Table 1: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 1
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 40.40 0.5 0.5 Top soil
2 302.60 0.4 0.9 Clayey sand
3 3007.20 1.2 2.20 Sand
4 27932.90 8.1 10.30 Sand (very dry)
5 31529.20 31.20 41.40 Sand (very dry)
6 6892.00 - - Lateritic sand
Figure 4: field and theoretical curves for VES 2
Table 2: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 2
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 75.20 1.00 1.00 Top soil
2 348.40 4.00 5.00 Clayey sand
3 526.40 8.90 13.00 Sand
4 818.20 18.90 32.90 Sand (very dry)
5 519.90 - - Sand (wet)
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 79 | Page
Figure 5: field and theoretical curves for VES 3
Table 3: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 3
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 85.80 0.70 0.70 Top soil
2 127.80 0.90 1.60 Clayey sand
3 772.70 4.30 5.90 Sand
4 968.30 22.00 27.90 Sand (dry)
5 572.60 --- --- Sand (wet)
Figure 6: field and theoretical curves for VES 4
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 80 | Page
Table 4: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 4
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 77.00 0.90 0.90 Top soil
2 547.70 6.30 7.20 Sand
3 343.30 10.10 17.30 Sand (wet)
4 499.30 21.00 38.30 Sand
5 579.50 14.10 52.40 Sand (dry)
6 556.00 - - Sand (wet)
Figure 7: field and theoretical curves for VES 5
Table 5: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 5
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 232.40 1.20 1.20 Top soil
2 433.30 4.20 5.40 Sand
3 1826.50 15.50 20.90 Sand (very dry)
4 1510.20 32.00 52.90 Sand (dry)
5 1174.50 - - Lateritic sand
Figure 8: field and theoretical curves for VES 6
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 81 | Page
Table 6: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 6
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 43.60 0.70 0.70 Top soil
2 815.50 5.90 6.60 Sand (dry)
3 502.00 15.70 22.30 Sand (wet)
4 424.70 14.10 36.40 Sand
5 2148.10 28.30 52.00 Sand (dry)
Figure 9: field and theoretical curves for VES 7
Table 7: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 7
Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology
1 84.00 1.40 1.40 Top soil
2 463.40 4.60 6.00 Sand
3 1511.40 45.20 51.20 Lateritic sand
4 1180.90 . . Sand (dry)
Table 8: Summary of results
Geoelectric layer Curve shape Depth to Aquifer
(m)
Latitude Longitude Elevation (m)
1 AAAK Below 41.30 E0030
04’
23.00’’
N060
35’53.00’’
43.00
2 AAK Below 32.90 E0030
04’
00.00’’
N060
32’00.00’’
42.00
3 AAK Below 27.90 E0030
04’
03.70’’
N060
36’04.50’’
36.00
4 KHAK Below 17.30 E0030
04’
46.50’’
N060
35’33.90’’
38.90
5 AKQ Below 52.90 E0030
04’
50.80’’
N060
35’28.60’’
37.90
6 KQH Below 22.30 E0030
04’
17.90’’
N060
36’02.40’’
41.70
7 AK Not penetrated E0030
04’
05.60’’
N060
35’45.80’’
39.00
V. Conclusion
The Geoelectric section of VES 1 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the
AAAK-type with 1 2 3 4 5 6          . The first layer with a resistivity value of 40.40  m and a
thickness of 0.50m is the top soil. The second layer suspected to be sandy clay has a resistivity value of 302.60
 m and a thickness of 1.20m indicating the presence of sand. The fourth and fifth layers contain very dry sand.
They have thicknesses of 8.10m and 31.20m respectively. The sixth layer with a resistivity value of 6892.00 
m; suspected to contain lateritic sand, and lying below a depth of 41.30m is the aquifer.
The geoelectric section of VES 2 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the
AAK-type, with 1 2 3 4 5        .The first layer has a resistivity value of 75.20  m and a thickness
of 1.00m indicating the top soil. The second layer has a resistivity of 348.40  m with a thickness of 4.00m and
it is composed of clayey sand. The third layer has a resistivity value of 526.20  m with a thickness of 8.90m,
and they are made of sand. The fourth layer has a resistivity value of 818.20  m with a thickness of 18.90m
and it is suspected to be dry sand. The fifth layer with a resistivity value of 519.90m and below a depth of
32.90m is the aquifer.
1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 82 | Page
The geoelectric section of VES 3 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the
AAK-type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first and second layers have resistivity values of 85.80  m
and 127.80  m . They also have thicknesses of 0.70m and 1.60m, and these indicate the top soil and the clayey
sand respectively. The third layer is suspected to be sand. It has a resistivity value of 772.70  m and a
thickness of 4.30m. The fourth layer resistivity value of 968.30 m with a corresponding thickness of 22.00m
shows the presence of dry sand. The fifth layer has a resistivity value of 572.60  m and its indicate the
presence of wet sand. The later with a depth below 27.90m is the aquifer.
The geoelectric section of VES 4 shows geoelectric layer and its apparent resistivity curve is the
KHAK – type, with 1 2 3 4 5 6          . The first layer with a resistivity value of 77.00  m and
a thickness of 0.90m is the top soil. The second layer has a resistivity value of 547.70  m and a thickness
of6.30m and it is made up of sand. The third and fourth layers have resistivity values of 343.30  m and 499.30
 m with thickness of 10.10 and 21.00 metres respectively. The earlier contains wet sand while the later
contain ordinary sand. The fifth layer has a thickness of 14.10 metres and a resistivity value of 579.50  m. It
contain dry sand. The sixth layer with a resistivity value of 556.00  m and having a depth below 52.40 metres
is a shallow aquifer while the third layer of depth below 17.30 metres is a deep aquifer.
The geoelectric section of VES 5 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AKQ
– type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first layer with a resistivity value of 232.40  m and a thickness of
120m is the top soil. The second layer is suspected to be sand and it contains a resistivity value of 433.30  m
and a thickness of 4.20m. The third and fourth layers have resistivity values of 1826.50  m and 1510.20 m
with thicknesses of 15.50 and 32.00 metres respectively. They both contain dry sand (but the third layer is
dryer). The fifth layer is believed to contain lateritic sand. It has a resistivity value of 1174.50  m. The fourth
layer with a depth of 52.90m is the aquifer.
The geoelectric section of VES 6 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the KQH
– type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first layer is the top soil with a resistivity value of 43.60 m and a
thickness of 0.70m. The second layer has a resistivity value of 815.50  m with a thickness of 5.90m and it
contains dry sand. The third layer has a resistivity value of 502.00  m with a thickness of 15.70m and it shows
the presence of wet sand. The fourth and fifth layers contain sand. They have resistivity values of 424.70  m
and 543.20 m respectively with the earlier having a thickness of 14.10m. The third layer with a depth of 22.30
metres is the aquifer.
The geoelectric section of VES 7 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AK –
type with 1 2 3 4      . The first layer with a thickness of 1.40m and a resistivity value of 84.00 is the
top soil. The second layer with resistivity value of 463.40  m and thickness of 4.60m indicates the presence of
sand. The third layer suspected to be lateritic sand has a resistivity value of 1511.40  m and a thickness of
45.20m. The fourth layer with a resistivity value of 1180.90  m contains dry sand.
The electrical resistivity method of prospecting for groundwater is cost effective compared to other
methods. My recommendation is that anyone that wants to do the same work in this same environment should
ensure the length of electrode spread for the vertical electrical sounding (VES) extend beyond 200 metres (used
in this research work) for the depth of groundwater resolution.
References
[1]. Francis A. Dawodu (2013). Geoelectric investigation of Groundwater conditions: A case study of Ogwashi – Uku in Delta State,
Nigeria. Journal of the Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics,25(2), November, 2013, 81 -88.
[2]. Hamil, L. And Bell, (1986). Groundwater resources development britain library cataloguing in publication data london, 151 – 158.
[3]. Omotasola M. E. and Adegoke O. S. (1981). Tectonic evolution and cretaceous stratigraphy of the Dahomey Basin. Journal of
Mining and Geology, 18 (1), 130 – 137.
[4]. Jones H. A. And Hockey R.D. (1964). The Geology of parts of South-western Nigeria. Bulletin of the Geological survey of
Nigeria, 31, 86 – 88.
[5]. Gbadebo A.M., Taiwo a.m., Ayedun H. And Adeola A.J. (2012). Geochemical Analysis of Groundwater Quality in Agbara and
Environs. Journal of Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2-3.
[6]. Allen J.R.L. and Wells J.W. (1962): Holocene coral banks and subsidence in the Niger Delta. Journal of Geology, 70 (4), 381 – 397.
Corresponding author: Usifo A.G.
E- mail: abel.giwa.usifo@gmail.com

More Related Content

PDF
Self Potential Method (Electrical Survey)
PDF
Electrical survey 2018
PPT
Lecture 13-electrical method -field procedure
PPTX
Application Of Resistivity For Groundwater, Hydrogeology and Pollution Research
PPT
Geological criteria in exploration
PPTX
Geophysical exploration
PPTX
Seismic Reflection
PDF
Gravity & magnetic methods in geology
Self Potential Method (Electrical Survey)
Electrical survey 2018
Lecture 13-electrical method -field procedure
Application Of Resistivity For Groundwater, Hydrogeology and Pollution Research
Geological criteria in exploration
Geophysical exploration
Seismic Reflection
Gravity & magnetic methods in geology

What's hot (20)

PPT
Graphical presentation and classification for assessment of Ground water Qual...
PPT
Gsi exam preparation
PDF
Induced polarization method (electrical survey)
PPTX
Mississippi valley type deposits
PPTX
Presentation on geophysical methods
PDF
METAMORPHIC DIFFERENTIATION
PDF
Electrical resistivity method ( electrical survey)
PDF
Geology
PPT
Magnetic prospecting
PPTX
Origin and Abundance of elements in the Solar system and in the Earth and its...
PPT
Kimberlites
PPTX
ELECTRICAL METHODS OF GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS.pptx
PPTX
Geophysical methods brief summary
PPTX
Ore Microscopy 2012
PPT
Ground Geophysical Survey
PDF
Metallogenic Epoch and Province
DOCX
PDF
Magnetic Survey
PDF
Resistivity Survey
PDF
Lecture 10 textures of ore deposits and associated features
Graphical presentation and classification for assessment of Ground water Qual...
Gsi exam preparation
Induced polarization method (electrical survey)
Mississippi valley type deposits
Presentation on geophysical methods
METAMORPHIC DIFFERENTIATION
Electrical resistivity method ( electrical survey)
Geology
Magnetic prospecting
Origin and Abundance of elements in the Solar system and in the Earth and its...
Kimberlites
ELECTRICAL METHODS OF GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS.pptx
Geophysical methods brief summary
Ore Microscopy 2012
Ground Geophysical Survey
Metallogenic Epoch and Province
Magnetic Survey
Resistivity Survey
Lecture 10 textures of ore deposits and associated features
Ad

Similar to 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. (20)

PDF
Subsurface 2D Image Analyses of the Uyangha Basement Area, South-Eastern Nigeria
PDF
G012645256.iosr jmce p1
PDF
G012645256.iosr jmce p1
PDF
Determination of Thickness of Aquifer with Vertical Electrical Sounding
PDF
E030101023029
PDF
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
PDF
Site Investigation of Subsurface Lithology of Ignatius Ajuru University of Ed...
PDF
Lithological Investigation at Tombia and Opolo Using Vertical Electrical Soun...
PDF
Evaluation of sub-soil geo-electric properties in a proposed power sub-statio...
PPTX
EUNICE PRESENTATION.pptx
PDF
Determination of Thickness of Overburden in Basement Area Using Schlumberger ...
PDF
F021203036039
PDF
PDF
Electrical Resistivity Survey Forground Water At Eye Zheba Village, Off Bida ...
PPTX
TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING SURVEY FOR LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC....
PDF
Gi2511541161
PDF
Gi2511541161
PDF
Gh2511431153
PDF
Gh2511431153
PDF
Electrical resistivity sounding for subsurface delineation and evaluation of ...
Subsurface 2D Image Analyses of the Uyangha Basement Area, South-Eastern Nigeria
G012645256.iosr jmce p1
G012645256.iosr jmce p1
Determination of Thickness of Aquifer with Vertical Electrical Sounding
E030101023029
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Site Investigation of Subsurface Lithology of Ignatius Ajuru University of Ed...
Lithological Investigation at Tombia and Opolo Using Vertical Electrical Soun...
Evaluation of sub-soil geo-electric properties in a proposed power sub-statio...
EUNICE PRESENTATION.pptx
Determination of Thickness of Overburden in Basement Area Using Schlumberger ...
F021203036039
Electrical Resistivity Survey Forground Water At Eye Zheba Village, Off Bida ...
TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING SURVEY FOR LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC....
Gi2511541161
Gi2511541161
Gh2511431153
Gh2511431153
Electrical resistivity sounding for subsurface delineation and evaluation of ...
Ad

More from iosrjce (20)

PDF
An Examination of Effectuation Dimension as Financing Practice of Small and M...
PDF
Does Goods and Services Tax (GST) Leads to Indian Economic Development?
PDF
Childhood Factors that influence success in later life
PDF
Emotional Intelligence and Work Performance Relationship: A Study on Sales Pe...
PDF
Customer’s Acceptance of Internet Banking in Dubai
PDF
A Study of Employee Satisfaction relating to Job Security & Working Hours amo...
PDF
Consumer Perspectives on Brand Preference: A Choice Based Model Approach
PDF
Student`S Approach towards Social Network Sites
PDF
Broadcast Management in Nigeria: The systems approach as an imperative
PDF
A Study on Retailer’s Perception on Soya Products with Special Reference to T...
PDF
A Study Factors Influence on Organisation Citizenship Behaviour in Corporate ...
PDF
Consumers’ Behaviour on Sony Xperia: A Case Study on Bangladesh
PDF
Design of a Balanced Scorecard on Nonprofit Organizations (Study on Yayasan P...
PDF
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
PDF
Media Innovations and its Impact on Brand awareness & Consideration
PDF
Customer experience in supermarkets and hypermarkets – A comparative study
PDF
Social Media and Small Businesses: A Combinational Strategic Approach under t...
PDF
Secretarial Performance and the Gender Question (A Study of Selected Tertiary...
PDF
Implementation of Quality Management principles at Zimbabwe Open University (...
PDF
Organizational Conflicts Management In Selected Organizaions In Lagos State, ...
An Examination of Effectuation Dimension as Financing Practice of Small and M...
Does Goods and Services Tax (GST) Leads to Indian Economic Development?
Childhood Factors that influence success in later life
Emotional Intelligence and Work Performance Relationship: A Study on Sales Pe...
Customer’s Acceptance of Internet Banking in Dubai
A Study of Employee Satisfaction relating to Job Security & Working Hours amo...
Consumer Perspectives on Brand Preference: A Choice Based Model Approach
Student`S Approach towards Social Network Sites
Broadcast Management in Nigeria: The systems approach as an imperative
A Study on Retailer’s Perception on Soya Products with Special Reference to T...
A Study Factors Influence on Organisation Citizenship Behaviour in Corporate ...
Consumers’ Behaviour on Sony Xperia: A Case Study on Bangladesh
Design of a Balanced Scorecard on Nonprofit Organizations (Study on Yayasan P...
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
Media Innovations and its Impact on Brand awareness & Consideration
Customer experience in supermarkets and hypermarkets – A comparative study
Social Media and Small Businesses: A Combinational Strategic Approach under t...
Secretarial Performance and the Gender Question (A Study of Selected Tertiary...
Implementation of Quality Management principles at Zimbabwe Open University (...
Organizational Conflicts Management In Selected Organizaions In Lagos State, ...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
PPTX
Pharmacology of Autonomic nervous system
PDF
Unveiling a 36 billion solar mass black hole at the centre of the Cosmic Hors...
PDF
Lymphatic System MCQs & Practice Quiz – Functions, Organs, Nodes, Ducts
PDF
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
PDF
Is Earendel a Star Cluster?: Metal-poor Globular Cluster Progenitors at z ∼ 6
PDF
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
PPT
veterinary parasitology ````````````.ppt
PPTX
Science Quipper for lesson in grade 8 Matatag Curriculum
PDF
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
PPTX
POULTRY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENTNNN.pptx
PPTX
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx
PDF
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
PDF
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
PDF
The Land of Punt — A research by Dhani Irwanto
PDF
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
PPT
6.1 High Risk New Born. Padetric health ppt
PDF
An interstellar mission to test astrophysical black holes
PPTX
Biomechanics of the Hip - Basic Science.pptx
PPTX
Hypertension_Training_materials_English_2024[1] (1).pptx
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
Pharmacology of Autonomic nervous system
Unveiling a 36 billion solar mass black hole at the centre of the Cosmic Hors...
Lymphatic System MCQs & Practice Quiz – Functions, Organs, Nodes, Ducts
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
Is Earendel a Star Cluster?: Metal-poor Globular Cluster Progenitors at z ∼ 6
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
veterinary parasitology ````````````.ppt
Science Quipper for lesson in grade 8 Matatag Curriculum
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
POULTRY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENTNNN.pptx
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
The Land of Punt — A research by Dhani Irwanto
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
6.1 High Risk New Born. Padetric health ppt
An interstellar mission to test astrophysical black holes
Biomechanics of the Hip - Basic Science.pptx
Hypertension_Training_materials_English_2024[1] (1).pptx

1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria.

  • 1. IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSR-JAGG) e-ISSN: 2321–0990, p-ISSN: 2321–0982.Volume 3, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 75-82 www.iosrjournals.org DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 75 | Page 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. Usifo A.G.1 , Adeola A.J.1 , Babafemi E. M.2 , and Akinnawo O. O.1 1 (Department of Physical and Earth Sciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Crawford University, Nigeria) 2 (Skangix Development Limited, Chevy View Estate, Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria) Abstract: This research involved the use of 1-D electrical resistivity survey method for groundwater investigation in Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State. Seven (7) vertical electrical resistivity soundings (VES) using Schlumberger array were carried out at different locations. The Schlumberger resistivity soundings were executed with half-spacing in the range of 1.00 – 100.00 metres. The curve types are AAK, AAK, KHAK, AKQ, KQH, AK. The study shows that viable aquifer is within 17.30 – 52.90 metres square. Keywords: Aquifer, Curves types, Electrical resistivity, Groundwater, Vertical Electrical Sounding. I. Introduction Groundwater is one of the most important natural resources. It is normally used to augment the supplies from surface sources and sometimes it is the main source of water supplies [1]. To harness groundwater for domestic and industrial usage usually require the drilling of boreholes which is quite expensive and is prone to failure when there is no prior knowledge of the sub surface geology, hence the need for thorough geophysical stu dies. The VES method is a depth sounding galvanic method and has proved very useful in groundwater studies due to simplicity and reliability of the method. The electrical resistivity of rock is a property which depends on lithology and fluid contents. The ultimate objective of VES at some locality is to obtain a true resistivity log similar to the induction log of a well at the locality, without actually drilling the well [2]. In this study, the electrical resistivity method, i.e. the VES technique was used to delineate the different subsurface geoelectric layers, the aquifer units and their hydrogeologic properties. 11. HEADINGS 1. Introduction 2. Indentations and Equations 2.1. Physical and geological setting of the study area 2.2 Methodology 3. Figures and Tables 4. Conclusion 5. Acknowledgements II. Identations And Equations 2.1. Physical and geological setting of the study area Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State is situated within longitudes N060 30/ 00 and N060 70/ 00 and latitudes E0030 04/ 00.00// and E0030 04/ 51.00// . In Adodo/Ota local Government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria (Figure1).The study area forms part of the Dahomey (Benin) basin, a very extensive sedimentary basin on the continental margin of the Gulf of Guinea, which extends from the Volta River Delta. South-eastern Ghana in the West, to the western flank of the Niger Delta [3, 4]. This formation known as coastal plain sand is made of poorly sorted sands which are in parts cross-bedded and shows transitional to continental characteristics like Ilaro and Abeokuta formations. The thickness of the coastal plain sand ranges from 10m to 100m while the ages fall under Pleistocene and Oligocene [5]. Despite several published works on the stratigraphic units particularly in the Palaeogene of South-western Nigeria. The sedimentary basin in the Southern Nigeria is particularly divided into Western and Eastern portions by the Okitipupa ridge a submarine basement whose outcrop approaches 40km of the coast at about 40 30/ E. In the Western part of the basin, sedimentation did not begin until the terminal stages of the cretaceous whereas; the earliest transgression in the Eastern part was during the Albian. Tertiary sediments accumulated in the eastern half of an extensive Mesozoic-cenozoic coastal basin which extends from Ghana in the west to Cameroun in the east. Marked variations existed in the texture and thickness of about 10,000 to 12, 000 metres beneath the shelf of the Niger Delta [6].
  • 2. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 76 | Page The Paleocene sea covers the Southern Nigeria extending entire westward to Republics of Benin and Togo. The Palaocene deposits are characterized by extremely rapid lateral faces changes. In the eastern Nigeria, the strata are large, composed of dark grey, thinly laminated friable Imo shale with occasional admixture of clay ironstone and sandstone beds. To the west, biogenic limestone of the Ewekoro formation are found in the lower part of the Palaeocene section [5]. The Palaeocene deposits in Western Nigeria were attended by local crustal elevation which resulted in extensive erosion of the upper units of limestone. Glauconitic shale and Phosphatic materials accumulated on the surface of the limestone. III. Methodology Vertical Electrical Soundings (VES) were carried out in the study area with an ABEM TERRAMETER SAS (Signal Averaging System) 300B with booster SAS 2000 manufactured in Sweden was used for taking surface resistivity readings. The equipment is light and powerful for deep penetrations. When the distance between the two current electrodes is finite (Fig. 2), the potential at any nearby surface point will be affected by both current electrodes. As before, the potential due to C1 at P1 is 1 1 1 1 2 aIA V where A r     Because the currents at the two electrodes are equal and opposite in direction, the potential due to C2 at P1 is 2 2 2 1 2 2 aIA V where A A r       Thus, we have 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 aI V V r r           Finally, by introducing a second potential electrode at P2 we can measure the difference in potential between P1 and P2 which will be 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 2 aI V r r r r                      . (1) Such an arrangement corresponds to the four electrode spreads normally used in resistivity field work. The end result of the field measurement is the computation of the apparent resistivity, using the equation KR I KV a  (2) where                            2 222 22 MN MNAB K (3) and a = Apparent Resistivity K = Geometric factor V = Volt; I = Current; R = Resistance AB = Current Electrodes Separation MN = Potential Electrodes Separation.
  • 3. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 77 | Page IV. Figures And Tables Figure 1: map of ketu - adie owe and environs. Figure 2: two current and two potential electrodes on the surface of heterogeneous ground of app. resistivity a
  • 4. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 78 | Page Figure 3: field and theoretical curves for VES 1 Table 1: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 1 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 40.40 0.5 0.5 Top soil 2 302.60 0.4 0.9 Clayey sand 3 3007.20 1.2 2.20 Sand 4 27932.90 8.1 10.30 Sand (very dry) 5 31529.20 31.20 41.40 Sand (very dry) 6 6892.00 - - Lateritic sand Figure 4: field and theoretical curves for VES 2 Table 2: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 2 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 75.20 1.00 1.00 Top soil 2 348.40 4.00 5.00 Clayey sand 3 526.40 8.90 13.00 Sand 4 818.20 18.90 32.90 Sand (very dry) 5 519.90 - - Sand (wet)
  • 5. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 79 | Page Figure 5: field and theoretical curves for VES 3 Table 3: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 3 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 85.80 0.70 0.70 Top soil 2 127.80 0.90 1.60 Clayey sand 3 772.70 4.30 5.90 Sand 4 968.30 22.00 27.90 Sand (dry) 5 572.60 --- --- Sand (wet) Figure 6: field and theoretical curves for VES 4
  • 6. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 80 | Page Table 4: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 4 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 77.00 0.90 0.90 Top soil 2 547.70 6.30 7.20 Sand 3 343.30 10.10 17.30 Sand (wet) 4 499.30 21.00 38.30 Sand 5 579.50 14.10 52.40 Sand (dry) 6 556.00 - - Sand (wet) Figure 7: field and theoretical curves for VES 5 Table 5: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 5 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 232.40 1.20 1.20 Top soil 2 433.30 4.20 5.40 Sand 3 1826.50 15.50 20.90 Sand (very dry) 4 1510.20 32.00 52.90 Sand (dry) 5 1174.50 - - Lateritic sand Figure 8: field and theoretical curves for VES 6
  • 7. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 81 | Page Table 6: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 6 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 43.60 0.70 0.70 Top soil 2 815.50 5.90 6.60 Sand (dry) 3 502.00 15.70 22.30 Sand (wet) 4 424.70 14.10 36.40 Sand 5 2148.10 28.30 52.00 Sand (dry) Figure 9: field and theoretical curves for VES 7 Table 7: Geoelectric layer parameter analysis of VES No. 7 Geoelectric layer Resistivity (Ωm) Thickness (m) Depth (m) Lithology 1 84.00 1.40 1.40 Top soil 2 463.40 4.60 6.00 Sand 3 1511.40 45.20 51.20 Lateritic sand 4 1180.90 . . Sand (dry) Table 8: Summary of results Geoelectric layer Curve shape Depth to Aquifer (m) Latitude Longitude Elevation (m) 1 AAAK Below 41.30 E0030 04’ 23.00’’ N060 35’53.00’’ 43.00 2 AAK Below 32.90 E0030 04’ 00.00’’ N060 32’00.00’’ 42.00 3 AAK Below 27.90 E0030 04’ 03.70’’ N060 36’04.50’’ 36.00 4 KHAK Below 17.30 E0030 04’ 46.50’’ N060 35’33.90’’ 38.90 5 AKQ Below 52.90 E0030 04’ 50.80’’ N060 35’28.60’’ 37.90 6 KQH Below 22.30 E0030 04’ 17.90’’ N060 36’02.40’’ 41.70 7 AK Not penetrated E0030 04’ 05.60’’ N060 35’45.80’’ 39.00 V. Conclusion The Geoelectric section of VES 1 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AAAK-type with 1 2 3 4 5 6          . The first layer with a resistivity value of 40.40  m and a thickness of 0.50m is the top soil. The second layer suspected to be sandy clay has a resistivity value of 302.60  m and a thickness of 1.20m indicating the presence of sand. The fourth and fifth layers contain very dry sand. They have thicknesses of 8.10m and 31.20m respectively. The sixth layer with a resistivity value of 6892.00  m; suspected to contain lateritic sand, and lying below a depth of 41.30m is the aquifer. The geoelectric section of VES 2 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AAK-type, with 1 2 3 4 5        .The first layer has a resistivity value of 75.20  m and a thickness of 1.00m indicating the top soil. The second layer has a resistivity of 348.40  m with a thickness of 4.00m and it is composed of clayey sand. The third layer has a resistivity value of 526.20  m with a thickness of 8.90m, and they are made of sand. The fourth layer has a resistivity value of 818.20  m with a thickness of 18.90m and it is suspected to be dry sand. The fifth layer with a resistivity value of 519.90m and below a depth of 32.90m is the aquifer.
  • 8. 1-D Electrical Resistivity Survey For Groundwater In Ketu-Adie Owe, Ogun State, Nigeria. DOI: 10.9790/0990-03517582 www.iosrjournals.org 82 | Page The geoelectric section of VES 3 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AAK-type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first and second layers have resistivity values of 85.80  m and 127.80  m . They also have thicknesses of 0.70m and 1.60m, and these indicate the top soil and the clayey sand respectively. The third layer is suspected to be sand. It has a resistivity value of 772.70  m and a thickness of 4.30m. The fourth layer resistivity value of 968.30 m with a corresponding thickness of 22.00m shows the presence of dry sand. The fifth layer has a resistivity value of 572.60  m and its indicate the presence of wet sand. The later with a depth below 27.90m is the aquifer. The geoelectric section of VES 4 shows geoelectric layer and its apparent resistivity curve is the KHAK – type, with 1 2 3 4 5 6          . The first layer with a resistivity value of 77.00  m and a thickness of 0.90m is the top soil. The second layer has a resistivity value of 547.70  m and a thickness of6.30m and it is made up of sand. The third and fourth layers have resistivity values of 343.30  m and 499.30  m with thickness of 10.10 and 21.00 metres respectively. The earlier contains wet sand while the later contain ordinary sand. The fifth layer has a thickness of 14.10 metres and a resistivity value of 579.50  m. It contain dry sand. The sixth layer with a resistivity value of 556.00  m and having a depth below 52.40 metres is a shallow aquifer while the third layer of depth below 17.30 metres is a deep aquifer. The geoelectric section of VES 5 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AKQ – type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first layer with a resistivity value of 232.40  m and a thickness of 120m is the top soil. The second layer is suspected to be sand and it contains a resistivity value of 433.30  m and a thickness of 4.20m. The third and fourth layers have resistivity values of 1826.50  m and 1510.20 m with thicknesses of 15.50 and 32.00 metres respectively. They both contain dry sand (but the third layer is dryer). The fifth layer is believed to contain lateritic sand. It has a resistivity value of 1174.50  m. The fourth layer with a depth of 52.90m is the aquifer. The geoelectric section of VES 6 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the KQH – type with 1 2 3 4 5        . The first layer is the top soil with a resistivity value of 43.60 m and a thickness of 0.70m. The second layer has a resistivity value of 815.50  m with a thickness of 5.90m and it contains dry sand. The third layer has a resistivity value of 502.00  m with a thickness of 15.70m and it shows the presence of wet sand. The fourth and fifth layers contain sand. They have resistivity values of 424.70  m and 543.20 m respectively with the earlier having a thickness of 14.10m. The third layer with a depth of 22.30 metres is the aquifer. The geoelectric section of VES 7 shows geoelectric layers and its apparent resistivity curve is the AK – type with 1 2 3 4      . The first layer with a thickness of 1.40m and a resistivity value of 84.00 is the top soil. The second layer with resistivity value of 463.40  m and thickness of 4.60m indicates the presence of sand. The third layer suspected to be lateritic sand has a resistivity value of 1511.40  m and a thickness of 45.20m. The fourth layer with a resistivity value of 1180.90  m contains dry sand. The electrical resistivity method of prospecting for groundwater is cost effective compared to other methods. My recommendation is that anyone that wants to do the same work in this same environment should ensure the length of electrode spread for the vertical electrical sounding (VES) extend beyond 200 metres (used in this research work) for the depth of groundwater resolution. References [1]. Francis A. Dawodu (2013). Geoelectric investigation of Groundwater conditions: A case study of Ogwashi – Uku in Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of the Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics,25(2), November, 2013, 81 -88. [2]. Hamil, L. And Bell, (1986). Groundwater resources development britain library cataloguing in publication data london, 151 – 158. [3]. Omotasola M. E. and Adegoke O. S. (1981). Tectonic evolution and cretaceous stratigraphy of the Dahomey Basin. Journal of Mining and Geology, 18 (1), 130 – 137. [4]. Jones H. A. And Hockey R.D. (1964). The Geology of parts of South-western Nigeria. Bulletin of the Geological survey of Nigeria, 31, 86 – 88. [5]. Gbadebo A.M., Taiwo a.m., Ayedun H. And Adeola A.J. (2012). Geochemical Analysis of Groundwater Quality in Agbara and Environs. Journal of Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2-3. [6]. Allen J.R.L. and Wells J.W. (1962): Holocene coral banks and subsidence in the Niger Delta. Journal of Geology, 70 (4), 381 – 397. Corresponding author: Usifo A.G. E- mail: [email protected]