Abatacept nel trattamento dell'artrite poliarticolare giovanile idiopatica (jia).

Drug Design, Development and Therapy Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research

Open Access Full Text Article Review

Abatacept in the treatment of polyarticular JiA:
development, clinical utility, and place in therapy

This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
25 January 2011
Number of times this article has been viewed

Ofra Goldzweig 1 Abstract: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a group of chronic arthritides affecting children.
Philip J Hashkes 2,3 The polyarthritis category, affecting five or more joints in the first six months, tends to be
1
Rainbow Babies and Children’s
more aggressive, leading to a destructive joint disease with significant morbidity, disability,
Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA; and costs to society. The current treatment regimen, which primarily combines methotrexate
2
Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Shaare and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blockade, still leaves a significant group of patients
Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem,
israel; 3Cleveland Clinic Lerner with an inadequate response. Therefore, the development of new medications that act via other
Medical School of Case western mechanisms of pathogenesis is necessary. T cell lymphocytes are key components in the immune
Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, reaction in JIA. Cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is a potent inhibitor of
USA
the costimulation pathway necessary to activate T cells. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion
protein comprising the extracellular part of human CTLA-4 connected to a modified Fc part of
IgG-1. In a randomized, multinational, blinded withdrawal study in children with polyarticular
JIA, abatacept was found to be effective in about 70% of the patients, including 39% of TNF-α
blockade failures, with significantly fewer flares occurring during the withdrawal phase than in
patients receiving placebo. Abatacept continued to show good efficacy in a three-year open-label
extension study, with a beneficial effect on health-related quality of life. The safety profile of
abatacept is generally good. In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration approved abatacept
for use in children over six years of age with JIA and a polyarticular course. In 2010, the European
Medicines Agency gave approval for abatacept to be used in combination with methotrexate for
those who fail at least one disease-modifying medication and TNF-α blockade.
Keywords: juvenile idiopathic arthritis, treatment, abatacept

Introduction
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic condition in
children, affecting approximately 1 in 1000 children.1 It is an inclusive term for a group
of chronic inflammatory arthritides affecting children younger than 16 years of age,
without another explanation.1,2 The categories are based on the presence or absence of
systemic symptoms or psoriasis, the number of joints involved in the first six months of
the disease, rheumatoid factor, and HLA B27 status (Table 1). The polyarthritis category
includes children with five or more affected joints during the first six months of the
disease, and is further subdivided according to rheumatoid factor status. This form of
Correspondence: Philip J Hashkes JIA tends to be more aggressive (especially rheumatoid factor-positive disease), caus-
Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Shaare
Zedek Medical Center, PO Box 3235,
ing joint destruction and disability early in its course, with radiographic changes
Jerusalem 91031, israel evident at a mean of two years from disease onset.2 The inflammatory process can be
Tel +1 972 2666 6242
Fax +1 972 2655 5297
difficult to control, and consequences include pain, disability,3 local and global growth
email hashkesp@szmc.org.il impairment,4 and major insults to function and health-related quality of life for the

submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2011:5 61–70 61
Dovepress © 2011 Goldzweig and Hashkes, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S16489 article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

Goldzweig and Hashkes Dovepress

Table 1 Categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and various pathways of the immune system. T cells have a
Category Proportion of patients (%) crucial role in initiating the cascade of the immune response
*Systemic 5–10 in JIA. Increased numbers of activated CD4+ and autoreactive
Oligoarthritis 40–50 CD8+ T cells are found in the circulation and the synovium
Persistent oligoarthritis 25–35
*extended oligoarthritis 15–20
of patients with JIA of polyarticular course.16 No specific
Polyarthritis 30–40 antigens that trigger T cell activation have been recognized,
*Rheumatoid factor-negative 25–35 but there are two major hypotheses on potential autoantigen
*Rheumatoid factor-positive 5
groups. These include heat shock proteins and epitopes
Psoriatic arthritis 5–10
enthesitis-related arthritis 5–10 from the components of joint tissue found in the inflamed
Other (undifferentiated, overlaps 10 synovium. The synovial fluid from patients with JIA of
more than one category) polyarticular course was found to contain higher levels of
Note: *Patients in these categories with polyarticular disease (and without active cytokines (including interleukin [IL]-12) and chemokines
systemic features) were included in the abatacept trials.
that upregulate the immune response.16 Activated oligoclonal
T cells that originate in the blood are concentrated in the
patient and his/her family.5 A significant percentage of patients synovial fluid in larger numbers in JIA.17 IL-17, produced
with polyarthritis continue to have active disease as adults.3,6 by subsets of CD4+ cells in the synovium, was recognized to
The disease affects multiple aspects of life, and carries a induce further local production of cytokines by synoviocytes,
heavy economic burden for society. Understanding this has especially IL-6, IL-8, and matrix metalloproteinases that
led to an earlier and more aggressive treatment regimen, enhance joint destruction. IL-17 also suppresses Tregs
with early introduction of disease-modifying antirheumatic (CD4+CD25+) activity. Tregs have an important role in
drugs, particularly methotrexate.7,8 However, more than the process of autoimmune disease prevention, and have
30% of patients do not respond adequately to methotrexate, been found in decreased numbers in patients with JIA of
including higher doses given parenterally.8,9 Full remission polyarticular course compared with those having persistent
is usually not achieved, even among responders. Therefore, oligoarthritis.18
new biologic medications based on an understanding of the
immune pathogenesis of JIA have been developed. This has Abatacept
revolutionized the treatment of JIA, particularly in patients The activation of T cells involves two major steps. The first
with a polyarticular course (Table 1). Polyarticular course consists of the presentation of a peptide by an antigen-presenting
includes patients with polyarthritis, extended oligoarthritis, cell to the T cell receptor (Figure 1).19 The second step can
and systemic arthritis evolving into a polyarticular course. be one of several costimulation associations between ligands
Most studied are the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) on the antigen-presenting cell and T cell receptors. One
blockers.10–12 More than 70% of patients with JIA having a of the most important is the link between the CD80/CD86
polyarticular course and treated with TNF-α blocking agents ligand on antigen-presenting cells and CD28 on T cells.
respond significantly. However, a large proportion of children CTLA-4 (CD152) is a member of the CD28 immunoglobulin
with polyarthritis still spend more than 60% of their time with superfamily expressed on the T cell membrane. It has a
active disease.13 For patients who do not respond adequately structural resemblance to CD28, but its affinity to CD80/CD86
to TNF-α blocking agents, for whom effectiveness wears is much higher. CD28 transmits a stimulatory effect, enhancing
off, or for those who cannot tolerate or use TNF-α blockers, activation and upregulation of downstream pathways. CTLA-4
there is still an unmet need.14,15 Therefore, new medications transmits an inhibitory signal to T cells and thus decreases
that target different mechanisms of pathogenesis have been activation of B cells, macrophages, and production of
developed. In this paper, we review the rationale and current proinflammatory cytokines, and induces anergy.20 Abatacept
data for the use of abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation (CTLA-4 immunoglobulin) is a recombinant fully humanized
inhibitor, in JIA with a polyarticular course. fusion protein, composed of the extracellular domain of human
CTLA-4 and a portion of the Fc-domain of human IgG-1 that
Role of T cells in pathogenesis was engineered to prevent complement fixation.21
of JIA Trials in adults with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated
Data on the pathogenesis of JIA are continuously improvement in disease control, health-related quality of
accumulating, with research focusing on genetic factors life, and reduction in joint damage in patients who failed to

62 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2011:5
Dovepress

Dovepress Abatacept for polyarticular JiA

acute-phase reactants, particularly C-reactive protein, TNF-α,
IL-6, and metalloproteinase-3.

Efficacy of abatacept in JIA
of polyarticular course
APC Abatacept was studied in a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled withdrawal trial performed in 45
CD80/CD86 centers in Europe and the US between 2004 and 2006.25
MHC
The study was conducted in European and South American
centers of the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials
TCR Organization and in the US by the Pediatric Rheumatology
Abatacept Collaborative Study Group. Children aged 6–17 years
CD28 with a polyarticular course of JIA were enrolled, including
Inactive patients with polyarthritis with and without rheumatoid
T cell factor, extended oligoarthritis, and systemic JIA without
systemic manifestations for at least six months. At the time
of enrollment, patients had to have at least two active joints
Figure 1 Schema of T cell activation and the inhibitory action of abatacept on and two joints with limited range of motion. Patients had to
costimulation. Copyright © 2008. Dove Medical Press. Reprinted with permission. have failed or not tolerated at least one disease-modifying
Kuemmerle-Deschner JB, Benseler S. Abatacept in difficult-to-treat JIA. Biologics.
2008;2(4):865–874.31 antirheumatic drug. Patients failing TNF-α blocking agents
Abbreviations: APC, antigen presenting cell; MHC, major histocompatibility complex;
TCR, T cell receptor.
were allowed to enroll after an adequate washout period
(four weeks for etanercept and eight weeks for infliximab
and adalimumab). Exclusion criteria included active
respond to other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.22 uveitis, pregnancy, lactation, or a major concurrent medical
Abatacept was approved for rheumatoid arthritis by the US condition. Methotrexate was the only disease-modifying
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2005. antirheumatic drug allowed during the controlled phase of
the trial (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and azathioprine
Pharmacokinetics were allowed during the open-label, long-term extension).
and pharmacodynamics Patients were primarily assessed using the American College
The pharmacokinetics of abatacept have not been specifically of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30, an outcome tool
examined in children or adolescents, and are based on studies developed in the 1990s that has been validated as an outcome
in healthy adults and patients with rheumatoid arthritis.23 measure in JIA trials (Table 2).26 The proportions of patients
Pharmacokinetics in healthy adults were examined after a single with an ACR Pediatric 50, 70, 90, and 100 response were
dose of abatacept and in rheumatoid arthritis patients after mul- also assessed.
tiple doses of 10 mg/kg (both groups were comparable).24 The One hundred and ninety patients entered the open-label,
mean volume of distribution was 0.07 (range 0.02–013) L/kg. At lead-in phase of the study; 147 (77%) were Caucasian, and 137
steady state, the plasma concentration level achieved at day 60 (72%) were females (Figure 2). Rheumatoid factor-negative
was 24–295 µg/mL. The half-life was 13.1 (range 8–25) days. polyarthritis was the most common diagnosis (44%). The
The systemic clearance was 0.22 mL/kg/hour, with a trend mean disease duration was 4.2 years. Patients had a mean of
of increased clearance with increased body weight. Systemic 16 active joints. More than 70% were treated with concurrent
accumulation was not demonstrated after prolonged therapy. methotrexate, and more than 30% had been treated unsuc-
Concomitant treatment with methotrexate, nonsteroidal anti- cessfully with at least one TNF-α blocking agent. In the first
inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, or TNF-α blockers did not phase, all patients received abatacept 10 mg/kg (maximum
change the clearance. Pharmacokinetics were not affected by 1000 mg per dose) on days 1, 15, 29, 57, and 85. Seventeen
age and gender. The influence of renal or hepatic dysfunction patients discontinued because the treatment was ineffective,
on pharmacokinetics was not studied. one withdrew because of an adverse effect, one was lost to
Abatacept pharmacodynamics at a dose of 10 mg/kg follow-up, and no reason was stated for one patient. By the
showed a decrease in serum levels of several cytokines and end of the lead-in phase, 123 subjects (65%) were considered

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2011:5 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
63
Dovepress


Table 2 Outcome measures for clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic by 49 (82%) patients in the abatacept group and 31 (50%)
arthritis validated by the American College of Rheumatology26 in the placebo group.
• Active joint count (joints with swelling or tender/pain on motion and Following this phase was an open-label, long-term,
limitation of motion)
extension period in which patients were given the option
• Joints with limited range of motion
to continue treatment with abatacept for up to five years.27
• Parent/patient global assessment (measured on a 0–10 vAS)
Subjects included in this phase belonged to several groups,
• Physician global assessment (measured on a 0–10 vAS)
ie, patients treated continuously with abatacept, those with
• Laboratory measure of inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate,
C-reactive protein) a flare during the double-blind phase, and six-month com-
• Functional assessment (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire) pleters regardless of the treatment arm. Patients who did not
Notes: ACR Pediatric 30 response: A patient is considered to have responded if achieve an ACR Pediatric 30 after the open-label phase were
there has been an improvement in at least three variables by at least 30% and
worsening in not more than one variable by more than 30%. Flare: A patient is
also allowed to enter the long-term extension. Patients were
considered to flare if there has been worsening of 30% or more in at least three assessed by joint examination and physician’s global assess-
of the six variables and at least 30% improvement in no more than one variable.
A minimum change of 20 mm in global assessment and at least two additional active ment of disease severity.
joints is necessary. Forty-two of 153 subjects who started this phase discon-
Abbreviation: vAS, visual analog scale.
tinued treatment early; 20 due to lack of effect (more than
half were from the group of the initial nonresponders) and
responders at least at an ACR Pediatric 30 response level. three because of adverse effects. Patients were treated for a
Twenty-four (13%) patients attained a status of inactive median of 35 (range 5.5–47.8) months. More than 50% were
disease (definition in Table 3). There were no significant treated for at least three years. Fifty-one patients were treated
differences in response rates between the various categories continuously with abatacept, and treatment was interrupted in
of JIA with a polyarticular course. 47 patients due to having received placebo during the double-
The pivotal phase was double-blind withdrawal blind phase. ACR Pediatric response rates at day 589 did
randomization to abatacept versus placebo. One hundred not significantly differ between these two groups (Table 3).
and twenty-two subjects (one eligible subject left the study However, significantly more patients in the continuous group
before randomization) entered this phase on day 113, with (22 patients, 43%) attained the status of inactive disease than
60 randomized to abatacept and 62 to placebo infusion in the interrupted group (11 patients, 22%).
(Figure 2). Treatment was administered every 28 days until Sixteen of the 36 patients who did not achieve an ACR
the development of an arthritis flare (definition in Table 2A) Pediatric 30 by the end of the open-label lead-in phase who
for up to six months. The primary outcome was the number entered the long-term extension phase stopped treatment early;
of patients in each arm of the study who flared within 11 because of loss of efficacy, one because of loss to follow-up,
these six months. Secondary outcomes included safety and and four without a documented reason. The response rate of this
tolerability of the drug, median time to disease flare, and other group was lower than those who responded in the open-label,
ACR Pediatric response rates at the end of six months. The lead-in phase, with only one subject attaining the status of
number of patients who developed a flare was significantly inactive disease (Table 4). However, it is important to note that
lower in the abatacept group compared with the placebo there was still a large number of responders (including at high
group (12 [20%] versus 33 [53%], respectively, P = 0.0003). levels of an ACR Pediatric 50 and 70 response) indicating that
The median time to flare in the placebo group was six months, a long trial of abatacept (even six months) may be necessary
but no calculation was possible in the abatacept groups due before a patient is considered to have failed treatment.
to insufficient events. Significantly more patients in the
abatacept group achieved an ACR Pediatric 50, 70, and 90 Patients naïve to TNF-α blockade
response rate, as well as inactive disease status, than in the versus TNF-α blockade failures
placebo group (Table 4). A full six months was completed AWAKEN (Abatacept Withdrawal study to Assess efficacy
and safety in Key ENdpoints) was the first trial to include
Table 3 Definition of inactive disease.6 JIA patients who had failed TNF-α blockade. One hundred
• No joints with active disease and thirty (70%) of the subjects in the AWAKEN trial were
• Normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (,20 mm/hour) naïve to TNF-α blockade. By the end of the open-label,
• Physician global assessment of 10 mm or less lead-in phase, 101 (76%) achieved an ACR Pediatric 30
• No uveitis
response, compared with 57 (39%) patients who failed

Dovepress


Open label lead-in phase
n = 190

Discontinued
4 months
n = 20

Completed lead-in phase
n = 170

Achieved ACR Pedi 30 Failed ACR Pedi 30
n = 123 n = 47

Abatacept Placebo
n = 60 n = 62

Discontinued Discontinued
n = 11 n = 31
6 months

Completed Completed
n = 49 n = 31

LTE LTE LTE
n = 58 n = 59 n = 36

Remaining Remaining Remaining
n = 48* n = 43* n = 20*

Figure 2 A flow chart of patient disposition in various phases of the abatacept trial.27
Note: One responder was not randomized.
Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; Pedi, pediatric; LTe, long-term extension.

TNF-α blocking agents in the past. The response rate of response rate for interrupted abatacept (placebo during the
continuous abatacept treatment on day 589 was similar double-blind phase and reintroduction of abatacept during
among the TNF-α blockade-naïve subjects (n = 46) and the long-term extension) treatment was greater among the
TNF-α blocking agent failures (n = 5). However, inactive TNF-α blockade-naïve group than the TNF-α blocking
disease status was attained in 46% of the TNF-α blockade- agent failures, especially among those who attained a high
naïve group, versus 20% in the latter group (Table 5). The response rate and/or inactive disease status (Table 5). No

65
Dovepress


Table 4 Response (percent) to therapy during various phases of the trial
Percent of patients achieving Level Pedi 30 Pedi 50 Pedi 70 Pedi 90 Pedi 100 Inactive disease
Lead-in open-label (n = 190) 65 50 28 13 NA 13
DB abatacept (n = 60) 82 77* 53* 40* NA 30*
DB placebo (n = 62) 69 52* 31* 16* NA 11*
LTe continuous abatacept (n = 51), day 589 90 88 75 57 20 43*
LTe interrupted treatmenta (n = 47), day 589 87 83 75 40 19 22*
LTe lead-in phase nonresponders (n = 22), day 589 73 64 46* 18* 0* 3*
Notes: aPatients who received placebo during the double-blind withdrawal phase; *Statistically significant differences.
Abbreviations: Pedi, American College of Rheumatology pediatric response rate; DB, double blind; LTe, Open-label long-term extension; NA, not available.

significant differences in response rates between TNF-α All assessments were performed three times in the open-label
blockade-naïve and failures were found in nonresponders in lead-in and the controlled withdrawal phases of the trial.
the open-label, lead-in phase who continued to the long-term Health-related quality of life parameters were significantly
extension. Among the five TNF-α blocking agent failures, decreased in the study subjects when compared with healthy
80%, 60%, and 20% achieved an ACR Pediatric 30, 50, and children at baseline, such as global health, physical function,
70 response rate, respectively. role/social limitations (emotional, role/social limitation),
physical and pain/discomfort. These improved significantly
Health-related quality of life, by the end of the open label, lead-in phase, with the physical
pain, sleep, and daily activities summary score increasing in ACR Pediatric 30 responders
Abatacept improves many aspects of the children’s health- to 42.5 (maximum = 55) at day 113. During the controlled
related quality of life.28 Health-related quality of life were withdrawal phase, health-related quality of life continued
assessed using the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), a to improve in subjects who were randomized to continue
validated tool translated into 32 languages. Two summary abatacept, but stabilized or worsened in the placebo group.
scores, ie, the physical summary score and the psychosocial Pain was reduced in all subjects during the open-label,
summary score, were calculated from analysis of 10 of 15 CHQ lead-in phase and in abatacept-treated patients during the
domains. Results were compared with healthy individuals.29 controlled withdrawal phase. However, pain increased in the
Pain was assessed by parents or caregivers using a 100 mm placebo-treated group. Reduction of pain was observed also
visual analog scale in which a higher score is worse. Sleep in patients who did not achieve an ACR Pediatric 30 response
was assessed using the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire after the lead-in phase.
which includes the following subcategories: bedtime resis- Following the open-label, lead-in phase, sleep index
tance, sleep onset delay, sleep duration, sleep anxiety, night scores improved among ACR Pediatric 30 responders,
waking, parasomnias, sleep-disordered breathing, and day- mainly in the domains of bedtime resistance, parasomnias,
time sleepiness. Total scores of 1–100 correlate directly with and daytime sleepiness. Sleep continued to improve in the
the magnitude of sleep disturbances. Participation in daily abatacept-treated subjects during the controlled withdrawal
activities was assessed with a questionnaire that addressed phase, but deteriorated in the placebo-treated subjects.
school attendance and the effect of JIA on the child and care- Following the open-label, lead-in phase, the ACR Pediatric
givers’ daily activities over the 30 days prior to answering. 30 responders missed fewer school days (2.6) per month and

Table 5 Comparison of the response rate (percent) of patients who were TNF-α blockade-naïve versus TNF-α blockade failures at
day 589 of the open-label long-term extension period
Patients achieving level (%) Pedi 30 Pedi 50 Pedi 70 Pedi 90 Pedi 100 Inactive disease
Continuous abatacept, TNF-α blockade-naïve (n = 46) 89 87 76 57 39 46
Continuous abatacept, TNF-α blockade failure (n = 5) 100 100 60 60 40 20
interrupted abatacept, TNF-α blockade-naïve (n = 41) 90 88 81* 46* 22* 24*
interrupted abatacept, TNF-α blockade failure (n = 6) 67 50 33* 0* 0* 1*
Nonresponders in lead-in phase, TNF-α blockade-naïve (n = 17) 71 65 53* 24* 6 6
Nonresponders in lead-in phase, TNF-α blockade failure (n = 5) 80 60 20* 0* 0 0
Note: *Statistically significant difference.
Abbreviations: Pedi, American College of Rheumatology pediatric response rate; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Dovepress


their parents missed fewer days (2.3) of their normal activities. hematoma and varicella with encephalitis. Both resolved
These effects continued only among abatacept-treated subjects without sequelae. In regards to serious adverse events in
during the controlled withdrawal phase. the placebo group, it is important to note that these patients
received four months of abatacept, and a long-term effect of
Safety abatacept on the immune system cannot be ruled out. Adverse
The safety profile of abatacept was generally good and events were reported in 37 (62%) from the abatacept group
essentially remained unchanged during all phases of the and 34 (55%) among placebo recipients (P = 0.47), with mild
study (Table 6). In the open-label, lead-in phase, six subjects infections being the most frequent. Mild infusion reactions
had serious adverse events that included arthritis flare in two occurred in 2%–3% of patients in both study arms. No other
patients and arthropathy in another. There was one case each serious infections, autoimmune disorders, or anaphylaxis
of varicella infection, ovarian cyst, and acute lymphoblastic developed.
leukemia diagnosed at day 89. The latter patient may have been In the long-term extension, 23 subjects developed serious
misdiagnosed with JIA. Adverse events were documented in adverse events (Table 6). These included arthritis flare (n = 6),
133 (70%) subjects. The most common adverse events were arthralgia, foot deformity, pyrexia, and vomiting (n = 2
headache (13%), nausea (10%), cough, diarrhea (9% each), each). The most common adverse events were infections,
upper respiratory tract infection (7%), and pyrexia (6%). Mild with nasopharyngitis developing in 17.6%, upper respiratory
infusion reactions were documented in eight patients (4%). tract infections in 16.3%, vomiting in 15%, and pyrexia in
These included headache and dizziness and did not recur. 14%. Serious infections developed in six subjects, includ-
In the controlled withdrawal phase, no serious adverse ing dengue fever, erysipelas, gastroenteritis, herpes zoster,
events were documented in the abatacept group. There were bacterial meningitis, and pyelonephritis. One case of uveitis
two serious adverse events in the placebo group that included and four cases of benign neoplasm developed. One patient
developed multiple sclerosis. No cases of mycobacterium,
opportunistic infections, or malignancies were observed.
Table 6 Summary of safety data from abatacept studies
Mild infusion reactions were uncommon. There were no
Open-label, lead-in Open-label,
and controlled long-term
significant laboratory abnormalities. Following the open-
withdrawal phases extension label, lead-in phase, antinuclear antibodies developed in
Number of patients 190 153 12 of 113 (10.6%) subjects who were initially antinuclear
Study length (months) 10 35 (47.8 maximum) antibody-negative. In the double-blind phase, new antinuclear
Patient-year exposure NA NA
antibodies developed in two (6%) of the abatacept group
Adverse events (total) 170 NA
Serious adverse events 6 23 and one (2%) in the placebo group. The development of
(total) double-stranded DNA antibodies was rare. None of those who
Adverse events leading 1 3 developed autoantibodies developed autoimmune disease.
to drug discontinuation
infusion reactions 9 15 (5 patients)
Antibodies to abatacept or to CTLA-4 developed in 23% of
Anaphylaxis-like reactions 0 2 the patients. Their presence did not influence the efficacy or
infections (total) 95 NA safety of abatacept.
Serious infections 1 6
A 2009 FDA pediatric advisory committee meeting
Mycobacterium infections 0 0
Other opportunistic 0 1 looked at five-year postmarketing data of 90 patients treated
infections with abatacept for up to 10 years until the age of 17 years.30
Autoimmune phenomena 0 0 Six serious adverse events (four in the US) were reported.
(total)
Four patients were treated for JIA and three for other indica-
Uveitis 0 1
Demyelinating events 0 1 tions. Serious adverse events included the aforementioned
“Lupus-like” syndrome 0 0 case of multiple sclerosis and lymphoma that occurred one
Autoantibodies 14 4 month after starting abatacept. This patient had vasculitis
Antibodies to medication NA 17
and was treated with many prior immunosuppressive medi-
Malignancies (total) 1* 0
Deaths 0 0 cations. The FDA has requested postmarketing follow-up of
Note: *Malignancy may have been prior to treatment and patient was misdiagnosed 500 abatacept-treated patients.
with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Adapted from Hashkes et al.15
In a small series, neutralizing antibodies to abatacept
Abbreviation: NA, not available. were found in six of nine (67%) of rheumatoid

67
Dovepress


factor-positive patients.31 However, these antibodies were However, there do not appear to be significant differences
not associated with disease flare or adverse events. Antibodies regarding serious infectious adverse events, with the excep-
were found more often when abatacept concentrations were tion of mycobacterium infections, which are probably less
below therapeutic levels. common in abatacept-treated patients.15 Infusion reactions
occur less frequently with abatacept than with infliximab.
Indications and practical issues
In 2008, the FDA approved abatacept for use in children older Future indications
than six years with moderate to severe JIA of polyarticular and directions in JIA
course. The drug can be used as monotherapy or in conjunc- Several case series have reported on the successful use of
tion with other nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic abatacept for JIA-related uveitis among TNF-α blockade
drugs. In 2010, the European Medicines Agency approved failures.33,34 No studies have been published on the use
abatacept in combination with methotrexate only in children of abatacept for systemic (with active systemic features),
who have failed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and juvenile psoriatic, and enthesitis-related arthritis. Studies
at least one TNF-α blockade agent. directly comparing abatacept with TNF-α blocking agents,
Abatacept is administered as an intravenous infusion abatacept with or without methotrexate, and abatacept use
over a period of 30 minutes. It is given every two weeks in early polyarthritis have not been performed. The effect
during the first month and then every four weeks at a dose of of abatacept on the progression of radiologic damage as
10 mg/kg (maximum 1000 mg). Premedication for infusion seen in adults should be investigated in the pediatric setting
reactions is not necessary. Tuberculosis and viral hepatitis using newly validated pediatric measures.35,36 Recent reports
status should be checked before treatment. Live vaccines in adults showing that subcutaneous abatacept may be as
should be avoided while taking the medication and until three effective as the intravenous route, and may offer a new, easier
months after discontinuation of the drug. Abatacept contains method of administration in children.37
maltose that can cause a false elevation of blood glucose for
up to one day after the infusion. Potential of genomic medicine
In a recent study from Canada, the costs of biologics In the future, it will be possible to personalize and adjust
versus conventional therapy in patients having JIA with correct treatment for the individual patient. The protein
a polyarticular course who failed or were intolerant to tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type (PTPN) 22 gene,
disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, were calculated.32 located on chromosome 1p13.3-13.1, encodes for a tyrosine
The study compared the costs (direct and indirect, eg, cost phosphatase that downregulates the activation of T lympho-
of adverse events) involved in giving etanercept, infliximab, cytes mediated by CD28 costimulation.38 A single nucleotide
adalimumab, and abatacept for one year in order to attain polymorphism in the PTPN22 gene (C1858T) causes a
an additional patient who achieved an ACR Pediatric 30 decrease in its activity. This polymorphism is more commonly
response status. Of the four drugs, abatacept was the least found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid fac-
expensive, with a cost of US $16,205 per year to achieve tor-negative polyarthritis JIA, oligoarthritis, systemic lupus
one patient with an ACR Pediatric 30 response. erythematosus, and diabetes mellitus.39,40 Due to the effect of
this polymorphism in enhancing T cell costimulation, there
Abatacept versus TNF-α blockers is an as yet untested hypothesis that abatacept will be more
The lack of head-to-head studies makes it difficult to compare effective in patients with this polymorphism.41 Genomic
these medications accurately. It appears that the efficacy is medicine may also enable us to predict which patients are
comparable, with a similar proportion of patients experienc- more likely to fail TNF-α blockade therapy and benefit from
ing an ACR Pediatric 30 and higher levels of response.10–12,25 earlier use of abatacept.
However, abatacept may take somewhat longer to achieve a
response than TNF-α blockers. The time to flare appears to Conclusion
be longer, and the proportions of patients who flare appears Abatacept is an immune-modulating drug, targeting
to be smaller when abatacept is withdrawn compared with T cell activation by interfering with one of the costimulatory
TNF-α blockers. In regards to safety issues, the number of mechanisms that are essential for cell activation. The drug is
patient-years of use for abatacept is still insufficient to com- effective in patients with moderate to severe JIA of polyarticular
pare it with TNF-α blockers, particularly for malignancies. course, either as monotherapy or in combination with other

Dovepress


nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Even 12. Lovell DJ, Ruperto N, Goodman S, et al. Adalimumab with or without
methotrexate in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2008;
after more than three years of use, the drug remains safe, with 359(8):810–820.
rare serious adverse events. However, long-term postmarket- 13. Ringold S, Seidel KD, Koepsell TD, Wallace CA. Inactive disease in
ing surveillance is necessary. For some patients, the time to polyarticular JIA: Current patterns and associations. Rheumatology
(Oxford). 2009;48(8):972–977.
response from the start of treatment may take as long as six 14. Lovell DJ, Reiff A, Ilowite NT, et al. Safety and efficacy of up to
months. In most patients, abatacept continues to be effective eight years of continuous etanercept therapy in patients with juvenile
rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(5):1496–1504.
for at least three years. There is also a significant positive 15. Hashkes PJ, Uziel Y, Laxer RM. The safety profile of biologic therapies
effect of abatacept on various aspects of health-related qual- for JIA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(10):561–571.
ity of life. Furthermore, abatacept may be more cost-effective 16. Macaubas C, Nguyen K, Milojevic D, Park JL, Mellins ED. Oligoar-
ticular and polyarticular JIA: Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev
than TNF-α blocking agents in treating patients with JIA of Rheumatol. 2009;5(11):616–626.
polyarticular course. Therefore, it is possible that the European 17. Nistala K, Wedderburn LR. Th17 and regulatory T cells: Rebalancing
pro- and anti-inflammatory forces in autoimmune arthritis. Rheumatology
Medicines Agency indication may be modified to allow for (Oxford). 2009;48(6):602–606.
earlier use of abatacept, even prior to TNF-α blockade failure. 18. Prakken BJ, Albani S. Using biology of disease to understand and guide
Future studies may include new indications for abatacept in therapy of JIA. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23(5): 599–608.
19. Hervey PS, Keam SJ. Abatacept. BioDrugs. 2006;20(1):53–61.
other categories of JIA and JIA-related uveitis, as well as the 20. Goeb V, Buch MH, Vital EM, Emery P. Costimulation blockade
optimal timing of abatacept use in relation to disease onset. In in rheumatic diseases: Where we are? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;
21(3):244–250.
the future, we might be able to tailor the use of abatacept for 21. Graca L. CTLA4Ig and the therapeutic potential of T cell co-stimulation
patients whose genetics will predict a better response. blockade. Acta Reumatol Port. 2008;33(3):267–276. [Portuguese].
22. Genovese MC, Schiff M, Luggen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of
the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years
Disclosure of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate
The authors report no conflicts of interests in this work. response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;
67(4):547–554.
23. Orencia® [Package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb
References Company; Aug 2009.
1. Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007; 24. Bruce SP, Boyce EG. Update on abatacept: A selective costimula-
369(9563):767–778. tion modulator for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;
2. Wallace CA, Levinson JE. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: Outcome 41(7):1153–1162.
and treatment for the 1990s. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1991;17(4): 25. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Quartier P, et al. Abatacept in children with
891–905. JIA: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial.
3. Packham JC, Hall MA, Pimm TJ. Long-term follow-up of 246 adults Lancet. 2008;372(9636):383–391.
with JIA: Predictive factors for mood and pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 26. Giannini EH, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Lovell DJ, Felson DT, Martini A.
2002;41(12):1444–1449. Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis
4. Minden K. Adult outcomes of patients with JIA. Horm Res. 2009; Rheum. 1997;40(7):1202–1209.
72 Suppl 1:20–25. 27. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Quartier P, et al; Paediatric Rheumatology
5. Ruperto N, Levinson JE, Ravelli A, et al. Long-term health outcomes International Trials Organization and the Pediatric Rheumatology
and quality of life in American and Italian inception cohorts of patients Collaborative Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of abatacept
with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. I. Outcome status. J Rheumatol. in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;
1997;24(5):945–951. 62(6):1792–1802.
6. Wallace CA, Huang B, Bandeira M, Ravelli A, Giannini EH. Patterns 28. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Li T, et al. Abatacept improves health-related
of clinical remission in select categories of JIA. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; quality of life, pain, sleep quality and daily participation in subjects
52(11):3554–3562. with JIA. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(11):1542–1551.
7. Hashkes PJ, Laxer RM. Medical treatment of JIA. JAMA. 2005; 29. Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation
294(13):1671–1684. and psychometric evaluation of the Childhood Health Assessment
8. Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al. Methotrexate in resistant Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results of the USA-USSR. double-blind, 32 countries. Review of the general methodology. Clin Exp Rheumatol.
placebo-controlled trial. The Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative 2001;19(4 Suppl 23):S1–S9.
Study Group and The Cooperative Children’s Study Group. N Engl 30. Durmoqicz EL. Pediatric focused safety review. FDA [online].
J Med. 1992;326(16):1043–1049. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/
9. Ruperto N, Murray KJ, Gerloni V et al. A randomized trial of parenteral
, CommitteesMeetingMaterials/PediatricAdvisoryCommittee/
methotrexate comparing an intermediate dose with a higher dose in ucm193143.pdf. Accessed 2010 Dec 21.
children with JIA who failed to respond to standard doses of methotrex- 31. Kuemmerle-Deschner JB, Benseler S. Abatacept in difficult-to-treat
ate. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2191–2201. JIA. Biologics. 2008;2(4):865–874.
10. Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, et al. Etanercept in children with 32. Ungar WJ, Costa V, Hancock-Howard R, Feldman BM, Laxer RM.
polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Cost-effectiveness of biologics in polyarticular-course JIA patients
Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(11):763–769. unresponsive to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Arthritis Care
11. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Cuttica R, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled Res (Hoboken).2011;63(1):111–119.
trial of infliximab plus methotrexate for the treatment of polyarticular- 33. Zulian F, Balzarin M, Falcini F, et al. Abatacept for severe anti-tumor
course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(9): necrosis factor alpha refractory JIA-related uveitis. Arthritis Care Res
3096–3106. (Hoboken). 2010;62(6):821–825.

69
Dovepress


34. Kenawy N, Cleary G, Mewar D, Beare N, Chandna A, Pearce I. Abatacept: 38. Hinks A, Worthington J, Thomson W. The association of PTPN22
A potential therapy in refractory cases of JIA-associated uveitis. Graefes with rheumatoid arthritis and JIA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Oct 5 2010. [Epub ahead of print]. 45(4):365–368.
35. Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, et al. Impact of T-cell costimulation 39. Lee YH, Rho YH, Choi SJ, et al. The PTPN22 C1858T functional
modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis polymorphism and autoimmune diseases – a meta-analysis.
or very early rheumatoid arthritis: A clinical and imaging study of Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(1):49–56.
abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):510–516. 40. Thompson SD, Sudman M, Ramos PS, et al. The susceptibility loci JIA
36. Ravelli A, Ioseliani M, Norambuena X, et al. Adapted versions of the Sharp/ shares with other autoimmune diseases extend to PTPN2, COG6, and
van der Heijde score are reliable and valid for assessment of radiographic ANGPT1. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(11):3265–3276.
progression in JIA. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(9): 3087–3095. 41. Gregersen PK, Lee HS, Batliwalla F, Begovich AB. PTPN22: Setting
37. Keystone EC, Kremer JM, Russell AS, et al. Switching patients with thresholds for autoimmunity. Semin Immunol. 2006;18(4):214–223.
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC)
abatacept is well tolerated and sustains previously established efficacy
[Abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(10 Suppl):S176.

Drug Design, Development and Therapy Dovepress
Publish your work in this journal
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer- has also been accepted for indexing on PubMed Central. The manu-
reviewed open-access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design script management system is completely online and includes a very
and development through to clinical applications. Clinical outcomes, quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit
patient safety, and programs for the development and effective, safe, http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from
and sustained use of medicines are a feature of the journal, which published authors.
Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/drug-design-development-and-therapy-journal

Dovepress

Abatacept nel trattamento dell'artrite poliarticolare giovanile idiopatica (jia).

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (9)

Similar to Abatacept nel trattamento dell'artrite poliarticolare giovanile idiopatica (jia). (20)

More from Merqurio (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Abatacept nel trattamento dell'artrite poliarticolare giovanile idiopatica (jia).