Anesthesia and perioperative care for aortic surgery

K. Subramaniam et al. (eds.), Anesthesia and Perioperative Care for Aortic Surgery,
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-85922-4_2, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Acute aortic syndrome is a modern term that
describes the acute presentation of patients with
characteristic “aortic” pain caused by one of the
life-threatening thoracic aortic conditions includ-
ing aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and
penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (Fig. 2.1). This
entity involves acute lesions of the aorta involving
the tunica media and can be distinguished by their
etiopathogenesis and characteristic appearance
using various diagnostic imaging modalities.
Recent advances in imaging techniques and ther-
apeutic interventions have increased awareness of
these pathological conditions and emphasized the
importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
Definition and Epidemiology
Acute aortic syndrome includes five classes of
aortic disease (Table 2.1).1
While being distinct
pathological processes, there is the possibility of
progression from one entity to another (Fig. 2.2).
Each of these processes also shares the Stanford
classification that defines the location and extent of
aortic involvement. Stanford type A begins in the
ascending aorta, while type B originates distal to
the left subclavian artery to involve the descending
thoracic aorta (Fig. 2.3). This classification system
is popular since it directs different management
strategies and correlates with patient prognosis.
Aortic dissections can also be classified as acute or
chronic, depending on whether the dissection is
less or greater than 2 weeks old.
Aortic Dissection
Classic aortic dissections (class I) are the most
common cause of acute aortic syndromes (70%).
Aortic dissection is the most common aortic
catastrophe occurring two to three times more fre-
quently than abdominal aortic rupture. The exact
incidence is unknown but studies quote it to be
2.6–3.5 per 100,000 person-years.2
Information
gathered from the International Registry of Acute
Aortic Dissection (IRAD) shows that two thirds
of patients are male with a mean age of 63.
Women are affected less often and present at a
mean age of 67. Patients with dissections involv-
ing the ascending aorta tend to present at a
younger age (50–55 years) than those with dis-
sections of the descending aorta (60–70 years).
Table 2.2 outlines multiple risk factors for the
development of aortic dissection with hyperten-
sion being the most common predisposing factor
(72%). Following this is a history of atherosclero-
sis (31%), cardiac surgery (18%), and Marfan’s
syndrome (5%). Younger patients (<40 years of
age) who present with aortic dissection most often
have associated Marfan’s syndrome, a bicuspid
aortic valve or a history of aortic surgery.3
Acute Aortic Syndrome
Cynthia M. Wells and Kathirvel Subramaniam
C.M. Wells( )
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh
Medical Center – Presbyterian Hospital,
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
e-mail: wellsc2@upmc.edu
2
17

C.M. Wells and K. Subramaniam
Pathologically, classic aortic dissections
(class I) are characterized by an intimal tear with
separation of the aortic media into two layers, the
inner two thirds and outer one third. This separa-
tion extends for a variable distance in both
circumferential and longitudinal fashion. The
vast majority of dissections originate from inti-
mal tears in the ascending aorta within several
centimeters of the sinuses of Valsalva where tor-
sional movement of the aortic annulus provokes
additional downward traction in the aortic root
and increases longitudinal stress in that segment
of aorta. The other common site for an intimal
tear to originate is in the descending aorta just
distal to the origin of the subclavian artery at the
Fig. 2.1 Classification of acute aortic syndromes (Reprinted with permission from Berger F et al.30
)
Table 2.1 Classification of acute aortic syndrome
Class I – Classic aortic dissection
Class II – Intramural hematoma
Class III – Localized dissection, intimal tear without
extensive intimal flap formation, localized bulge in the
aortic wall
Class IV – Penetrating aortic ulcers
Class V – Iatrogenic or post-traumatic dissection
Fig.2.2 Progression of one type of acute aortic syndrome
to another type
18

2 Acute Aortic Syndrome
site of the ligamentum arteriosum. Tears occur in
the isthmus area because of increased tension at
the union of the relatively mobile aortic arch with
the fixed descending thoracic aorta. From this
point, blood under pressure extends the dissec-
tion in an antegrade direction although retrograde
extension is also possible, thus forming a false
lumen and double channel aorta. A further reen-
trance tear allows blood to circulate in the false
lumen and communicate with the true lumen.
Reentry tears are often located in the abdominal
aorta, iliac arteries, or other aortic branches.
These small communications, normally less than
2 mm in diameter, represent intercostal and
lumbar arteries severed by the dissection pro-
cess.4
The true lumen is most often the smaller of
the two and is surrounded by calcifications if
present. The false lumen is located along the
outer curve of the aortic arch and from the aortic
isthmus, a dissection adopts a spiral route involv-
ing the left border of the descending thoracic
aorta and the left posterior region of the infradia-
phragmatic and infrarenal aorta (Fig. 2.4). From
there, a dissection may involve any branches of
aorta including the arch vessels, the left intercos-
tal, renal, and iliac vessels, most often, it is the
left renal and iliac artery which are involved.
The celiac, superior mesenteric, and right renal
arteries usually communicate with the true lumen.
Dissections rarely extend to the common femoral
arteries.
Class III dissections are characterized by the
presence of an intimal tear without a flap or
hematoma formation. Patients often present with
the classic symptoms of dissection and may have
associated aneurysms, aortic regurgitation, or
Fig. 2.3 Types of acute
aortic syndromes based on
the site of aortic involve-
ment (Reprinted with
permission from
Springer4
)
Table 2.2 Risk factors for aortic dissection
Long-standing hypertension
Male
Advanced age
Prior cardiac surgery
Known aortic aneurysm or prior dissection
Cardiac catheterization/surgery
Connective tissue disorders
Marfan’s syndrome
Ehlers−Danlos syndrome
Bicuspid aortic valve
Coarctation of the aorta
Hereditary thoracic aortic disease
Vascular inflammation
Deceleration injury
Cocaine
Peripartum
19

pericardial effusion. Imaging techniques such as
CT, MRI, or TEE may fail to detect this type of
dissection since each of these modalities depends
on the presence and identification of an intimal
flap or true and false lumen for diagnosis.
Aortography may show an eccentric bulge in the
aorta, which should raise the suspicion of this
class of dissection. Treatment is similar to that
for classic aortic dissection.1
Class V aortic dissections are caused by
traumatic or iatrogenic injury. Traumatic dissec-
tions are described in detail in another chapter.
Iatrogenic aortic dissections may result from
cardiac surgery, percutaneous coronary interven-
tions, or endovascular procedures. Dissections
resulting from cardiac surgical procedures may
occur during the procedure, early in the postop-
erative period, or their presentation may be
delayed for years.5,6
The incidence varies between
0.12% and 0.35% of cardiac surgeries, but the
mortality is high unless recognized early. Injury
to the aorta can occur at the site of cross-clamp
placement, cannulation and decannulation, aorto-
tomy, cardioplegic cannulation, or aortocoronary
anastomosis. Preexisting atherosclerotic or con-
nective tissue disease, increased aortic diameter,
previous heart surgery, a history of hypertension
and elevated CPB pressures are all risk factors.
There is a growing concern of an increased inci-
dence of aortic dissection following off-pump
coronary artery bypass grafting compared to on-
pump CABG related to the application of a side-
biting clamp under higher blood pressure and
pulsatility.7
Intraoperative TEE and epiaortic
ultrasound may help in the prevention and
early diagnosis of this potentially lethal compli-
cation. Type A dissections have been reported
after diagnostic coronary angiography (0.01%)
and other percutaneous interventions (0.03%).8,9
Isolated coronary artery dissections and localized
aortic dissections (less than 40 mm of ascending
aortic involvement) can be treated with intracoro-
nary or aortic stenting. However, a failed stenting
procedure or progression of a dissection must be
surgically treated. Retrograde type A dissections
after endograft placement for type B dissections
havebeenreportedwithanincidenceof10–27%.10
The presentation may be acute or delayed for sev-
eral months. Various etiological factors include
wire and sheath manipulation in the arch, repeated
balloon dilatations, oversizing of grafts, injury to
a diseased aorta at the margin of inflexible grafts,
and progression of disease unrelated to stent
grafting. Surgical replacement with tube grafts is
recommended in these patients and mortality is
high (27%). Other procedures associated with an
increased risk of aortic dissection include the
insertion of intra-aortic balloon pumps, percuta-
neous angioplasty, and stenting for coarctation of
the aorta.11
Fig. 2.4 CT reconstruction of a type A dissection follow-
ing graft placement in the ascending aorta. The dissection
that extends into the descending aorta demonstrates how
the defects spiral around the aorta
20

Intramural Hematoma
Aortic intramural hematomas (IMH) account for
up to 20% of all cases of AAS and represent a
variant of dissection characterized by the absence
of an intimal flap, reentrant tear, or double
channel with false lumen flow. IMH often occur
in patients with severe atherosclerotic disease in
which penetrating aortic ulcers or atherosclerotic
plaques rupture causing intimal injury with blood
entering the media. In patients with mild or no
atherosclerosis, spontaneous rupture of the vasa
vasorum may initiate aortic wall degeneration,
which leads to hematoma formation in the aortic
wall, splitting of the medial layer, and dissection
formation without an intimal tear (Class II).12
Patients in the first group tend to be older and
have coexisting coronary and peripheral vascular
disease. Absence of intimal tears is not manda-
tory in the diagnosis of IMH since small com-
munications may be seen indicating rupture as a
decompressing mechanism.13
The presence of
large intimal erosions or deep ulcer-like lesions
in the intima is associated with a progressive dis-
ease course and poor outcome.14
IMH evolution is difficult to predict (Fig. 2.5).
In some cases, the hematoma does not change in
size. Resolution occurs in fewer than 10% of
cases, but is more likely with less hematoma and
aortic wall thickness.2
When an IMH resolves, a
localized aneurysm may develop because of a
weakened media and remodeling, requiring close
surveillance. Progression of IMH may lead to
weakening and disruption of the intimal layer
causing a classic dissection. Progression to dis-
section has been shown to occur in 16–47% of
patients with IMH.15
A few patients may demon-
strate IMH and dissection in different segments of
aorta, known as a hybrid case. Increasing aortic
diameter (>50 mm) causing aneurysm formation
is a poor prognostic factor associated with IMH.16
In addition, increased permeability of the aortic
wall may lead to pericardial or pleural effusions
or a mediastinal hemorrhage. Most effusions will
resolve. However, large and progressive fluid
accumulations are an ominous signs. Weakening
of the adventitial layer may lead to aortic rupture,
while a contained rupture from disintegration of
the outer medial layers with intact adventitia is
not uncommon.17
Similar to aortic dissections, the
Fig. 2.5 Evolution of
intramural hematoma
(Reprinted with permis-
sion from Springer4
)
21

most common underlying condition associated
with IMH is hypertension.
Penetrating Aortic Ulcer
The term penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU)
describes a condition in which ulceration of an
atherosclerotic lesion penetrates the intima and
extends into the media, eroding the inner elastic
layer of the aortic wall. The reason why most ath-
erosclerotic ulcers do not penetrate the internal
elastic lamina and few penetrate the media and
adventitia is not clear. PAUs are focal lesions
most often located in the descending thoracic
aorta, which correlates with a greater disease bur-
den in that region. These patients tend to be older
with severe systemic atherosclerosis but without
connective tissue diseases. Multiple PAUs are
often found in a single patient. Imaging of PAU
most often reveals extensive atherosclerosis with
severe intimal calcification and plaque. A crater
or extravasation of contrast is often visualized.18
Occasionally, PAU may progress (Fig. 2.6).
This may precipitate a localized, intramural hem-
orrhage following progressive erosion and rupture
of the vasa vasorum.19
Further penetration to the
adventitia may lead to the formation of a saccular
aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm.20
Symptomatic
ulcers with signs of deep erosion are more prone to
aortic rupture.21
In rare cases, PAU may lead to
aortic dissection, but those dissections arising from
a PAU tend to be less extensive and demonstrate a
thick, calcified static flap in a location atypical for
entrance tears. Longitudinal spread of aortic dis-
sections arising from PAU is limited by medial
fibrosis and calcification.20
Acute Expanding Aneurysms
Also included in many discussions of acute aortic
pathology are symptomatic aortic aneurysms
which may represent impending rupture. The
acute expansion of an aortic aneurysm accounts
for a significant number of patients who present
with the sudden onset of chest pain. As aneu-
rysms increase in size, the dilatation results in
greater wall tension and a more rapid rate of
expansion. In addition, aneurysms may be associ-
ated with progressive dissections, IMH, or PAU,
all of which cause weakening of the aortic wall.
Etiopathogenesis
The physiopathological mechanism that precipi-
tates the appearance of each of these entities var-
ies somewhat; however, both acquired and genetic
conditions share an underlying pathology that
involves breakdown of the intimal layer and
weakening of the aortic media, both of which
lead to higher wall stress. In addition, it is
common for there to be progression from one
Fig. 2.6 Evolution of
penetrating aortic ulcers
sion from Springer4
)
22

type of lesion to another and some patients may
concurrently manifest multiple types of lesions.
Hypertension and Mechanical Forces
The most common risk factor for aortic dissec-
tion is hypertension. Chronic exposure of the
aorta to high pressures leads to intimal thicken-
ing, fibrosis, calcification, and extracellular fatty
acid deposition. The extracellular matrix also
undergoes accelerated degradation, apoptosis,
and elastolysis. Both mechanisms lead to intimal
weakening and medial degeneration.22
At any site
where there is tissue thickening and fibrosis, there
is compromise of nutrient and oxygen supply to
the arterial wall. Eventually, there is necrosis of
smooth muscle cells and fibrosis of elastic tissue
in the vessel wall. The resulting stiffness increases
the risk of aortic pathology when exposed to the
chronic trauma of arterial hypertension.
Genetic Predisposition
Marfan’s syndrome, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome,
familial forms of aortic aneurysm and dissection,
as well as bicuspid aortic valve are genetic condi-
tions that predispose patients to develop an acute
aortic syndrome and correlate with earlier
presentations. Among these, Marfan’s syndrome
is the most prevalent connective tissue disorder
with an incidence of one in 7,000. The underly-
ing defect is a mutation on the fibrillin-1 gene,
which results in defective fibrillin in the extracel-
lular matrix.22
Ehlers–Danlos syndrome is another inherited
connective tissue disorder characterized by tissue
fragility. The familial form of aortic disease has
been localized to mutations on the fibrillin-1
gene,similartoMarfan’ssyndrome.Characteristic
to each of the different genetic disorders is a sim-
ilar pathophysiology that includes a dedifferenti-
ation of vascular smooth muscle cells and
enhanced elastolysis of aortic wall components.
In addition, increased expression of metallopro-
teinases promotes fragmentation of elastic tissue
in the medial layer.22
Matrix Metalloproteins
The matrix metalloproteins are a group of proteins
whose primary function is to degrade extracellu-
lar matrix. Patients with thoracic aortic disease
have been shown to have increased levels of these
enzymes, which favor proteolysis within the aor-
tic wall. There are still many unanswered ques-
tions related to the role these enzymes play in
AAS; however, they may serve as a marker for
aortic pathology or their inhibition may slow the
progression of disease.23
Clinical Presentation
AAS is characterized clinically by “aortic pain,”
most often in a patient with a coexisting history
of hypertension. The early recognition of pain
associated with progressive aortic lesions is of
paramount importance. Table 2.3 lists various
presenting symptoms and signs of AAS and
Table 2.4 lists the most common associated con-
ditions. The characteristic findings listed may
Table 2.3 Presenting features of acute aortic syndrome
Chest pain – abrupt, severe, tearing, radiating
Anterior pain or radiation to neck – associated with
ascending aorta
Radiation to back or abdomen – associated with
descending aorta
Syncope or cerebrovascular accident
Hypertension – SBP > 150 mmHg
Shock or tamponade
Diastolic murmur
Pressure differential in upper extremities
Pulse deficits
End-organ ischemia
Table 2.4 Comorbid conditions associated with acute
aortic syndrome
History of hypertension
Smoking
Known coronary artery disease
Thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm
Peripheral arterial disease
Prior stroke
Chronic renal insufficiency
23

vary or be absent, emphasizing the necessity of a
high level of suspicion in order to avoid diagnos-
tic delays and poor outcomes.
The pain caused by PAU and IMH is similar to
classic aortic dissection. The various types of
AAS cannot be reliably differentiated on clinical
grounds alone. Aortic pain is described as
severely intense, acute, tearing, throbbing, and
radiating.24
In contrast to the increasing intensity
of dull cardiac pain, AAS is described as being
more abrupt and at maximal intensity from the
onset. In addition, 4.5% of patients deny having
any pain on presentation.25
Pain located in the
anterior chest and neck is related to involvement
of the ascending aorta and may be easily con-
founded with that of ischemic syndromes. Back
and abdominal pain may indicate that there is
involvement of the descending aorta. Syncope
may be the presenting symptom in up to 20% of
cases and is associated with a proximal dissec-
tion. The onset of syncope or central neurologi-
cal deficits indicates probable complications such
as obstruction of cerebral vessels, cardiac tam-
ponade, or activation of cerebral baroreceptors.
Other presenting features of AAS may include
end-organ ischemia or pulse deficits.3
Two types
ofdistalvisceralorganmalperfusionaredescribed
(Fig. 2.7). In static obstruction, the dissection
flap enters the origin of the branch and encroaches
on the lumen. If there is no reentry, then the true
lumen will be narrowed to cause ischemia. In
dynamic obstruction, the flap prolapses and
obstructs the origin of the vessel without entering
the vessel. Static and dynamic obstruction may
be combined to contribute to branch obstruction.
Diagnostic Evaluation
As diagnostic modalities have improved over the
past 2 decades, the awareness of AAS has
increased significantly. PAU and IMH were virtu-
ally unknown in the prior era of aortic imaging by
aortography. These disorders were not classified
as being distinct entities until the mid-1980s.
In the current era of three-dimensional, high-
resolution imaging by computerized tomography
(CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and
Fig. 2.7 Types of visceral
organ malperfusion with
aortic dissections
sion from Springer4
)
24

transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), these
two disorders have become increasingly recog-
nized. The sensitivity and specificity of different
imaging techniques and their comparison are
given in Table 2.5.26
The goals of diagnostic
imaging in patients with suspected AAS are con-
firmation of the diagnosis, classification and type
of aortic pathology, tear localization, and identifi-
cation of signs indicating the need for emergent
intervention (pericardial, mediastinal, or pleural
hemorrhage).2
Additional information includes
arch and branch vessel involvement. Each imag-
ing modality has distinct advantages (Table 2.6)
and most patients require multiple imaging stud-
ies to diagnose and characterize the underlying
aortic pathology.27
Electrocardiogram
An ECG is an important first diagnostic test
performed for all patients presenting with acute
chest pain, whether typical or atypical for an
acute aortic syndrome. The differentiation of
AAS from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is
important; however, it must be remembered the
ACS may occur as a result of AAS.
Chest Radiography
While rapid imaging plays a crucial role in the
diagnosis of AAS, the role of chest radiography
has become limited, especially for conditions
Table2.5 Results of meta-analysis – diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities for suspected aortic dissection
(Reprinted with permission from American Medical Association16
)
Imaging
technique
Number
of studies Sensitivity Specificity
Positive
likelihood ratio
Negative
likelihood ratio
TEE 10 98 (95–99) 95 (92–97) 14.1 (6.0–33.2) 0.04 (0.02–0.08)
Helical CT 3 100 (96–100) 98 (87–99) 13.9 (4.2–46.0) 0.02 (0.01–0.11)
MRI 7 98 (95–99) 98 (95–100) 25.3(11.1–57.1) 0.05 (0.03–0.10)
Data reported with 95% confidence intervals. Likelihood ratios greater than 10 and less than 0.1 are considered strong
evidence to confirm or ruling out the diagnosis of aortic dissection
Table 2.6 Comparison of imaging modalities (Reproduced with permission from Oxford University press and the
primary author Professor Raimund Erbel56
)
TTE/TEE CT MRI Angiography IVUS
Sensitivity ++ ++ +++ ++ +++
Specificity +++ ++ +++ ++ +++
Classification +++ ++ ++ + ++
Tear localization +++ − ++ + +
Aortic regurgitation +++ − ++ ++ −
Pericardial effusion +++ ++ ++ − −
Mediastinal hematoma ++ +++ +++ − +
Side branch
involvement
+ ++ ++ +++ +++
Coronary artery
involvement
++ − + +++ ++
X-ray exposure − ++ − +++ −
Patient comfort + ++ + + +
Follow-up studies ++ ++ +++ − −
Intraoperative
availability
+++ − − (+) (+)
TTE/TEE – transthoracic/transoesophageal echocardiography; CT – computed tomography; MRI – magnetic resonance
imaging; IVUS – intravascular ultrasound
25

confined to the ascending aorta. In a study of 216
patients over a 6-year period, the sensitivity for
aortic disease was 64%, with a specificity of 86%.
The sensitivity for lesions of the ascending aorta
was 47%, while that for disease involving distal
aortic segments was 77%.28
A chest X-ray may
show widening of the aortic contour, displaced
calcification, aortic kinking, or opacification of
the aortopulmonary window (Fig. 2.8a and b).
Computerized Tomography (CT)
When AAS is suspected based on clinical presen-
tation and an acute coronary syndrome has been
excluded, cardiac-gated, contrast-enhanced mul-
tidetector CT angiography is nearly 100% sensi-
tive and specific in the diagnosis, differentiation
and staging of AAS.29
Modern CT machines have
up to 64 rows of detectors, and this enables them
to generate multiple simultaneous images with a
slice thickness of less than 1 mm. Multidetector
CT is also extremely fast with spiral imaging
of the entire thorax can be done in a single
breath-hold, which eliminates respiratory motion
artifact. Cardiac gating is done to avoid artifacts
produced because of the imaging being obtained
during different phases of cardiac cycle. CT
allows for a complete diagnostic evaluation of the
thoracic aorta, including the lumen, aortic wall,
and periaortic region. Both unenhanced and
enhanced images are valuable. Unenhanced scans
depict intramural hematoma (crescent shaped or
circumferential wall thickening) and thrombosis
of the false lumen. Contrast-enhanced imaging
allows demonstration of an intimal flap, which is
the most reliable finding in the diagnosis of dis-
section (Fig. 2.9a and b). Contrast differences
between arterial and venous phase can help
differentiate true and false lumens. Interestingly,
it can be difficult to differentiate an aneurysm
with thrombus from a dissection with a throm-
bosed false lumen. Intimal calcifications are
displaced by a false lumen in the latter case.30
The diagnosis of IMH and PAU are also highly
accurate with CT.31,32
The diagnosis of PAU is
made by the demonstration of an outpouching
of the aortic wall with rough edges (Fig. 2.10).
Fig. 2.8 PA (a) and lateral Chest X-Rays (b) demonstrating a dilated thoracic aorta and widened mediastinum
26

The ulcer is usually surrounded by extensive ath-
erosclerotic plaques. CT imaging of the aorta
should include the iliac arteries for possible endo-
vascular intervention and aortic arch branches to
evaluate the extent of dissection and possible
neurological complications. Other benefits of CT
are its availability and noninvasiveness. The
major drawbacks of CT are the exposure to large
doses of ionizing radiation and contrast agents.29
In addition, CT does not offer the capability to
assess for aortic insufficiency or involvement of
the coronary arteries.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
MRI is a valuable diagnostic tool for the diagno-
sis of acute aortic syndrome. MRI can be highly
accurate even without the use of contrast.
Although MRI has the highest sensitivity and
specificity for the detection of all forms of aortic
pathology and provides superior anatomic detail
when compared to other imaging modalities, it is
limited by availability, expense, and patient
restrictions such as pacemakers, aneurysm clips,
or other metal devices. Prolonged scanning time
and limited access to unstable patients are other
limitations. For these reasons, MRI is not a
widely used tool (<5% of patients in IRAD)3
(Fig. 2.11).
Fig. 2.9 Contrast-enhanced chest CT clearly depicting a type A dissection. The intimal flap is seen in the ascending
and descending aorta (a) as well as the aortic arch (b)
Fig. 2.10 CT reconstructions demonstrating PAU of the
arch and descending aorta as indicated by arrows
27

Echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be
used as screening tool for the diagnosis of AAS
of the proximal aorta. TTE is useful in the rapid
evaluation of aortic insufficiency, pericardial
tamponade, arch vessel involvement, and left
ventricular systolic function. Hemodynamically
unstable patients in whom TTE has shown peri-
cardial effusion to be present should be taken to
the operating room for airway stabilization and
further TEE evaluation. Thus, cardiac surgeons
rely on echocardiography more than other
imaging modalities including CTA in emer-
gency situations.33
A TEE can be done while
the surgeon simultaneously prepares to open
the chest.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is
highly sensitive and specific in diagnosing tho-
racic aortic pathologies. The only limitation is in
the distal ascending aorta and proximal arch
which are not clearly visualized by TEE in
most patients. Evaluation of the aortic valve and
suitability for repair can be done with TEE.
The diagnosis of an IMH is characterized by
crescentric aortic wall thickening, the absence of
an intimal flap and a lack of false lumen color
flow typical of dissection. The primary limiting
factor in the use of TEE is the requirement for a
skilled echocardiographer to be immediately
available to perform and interpret results in emer-
gency situations.29
A further detailed description
of TEE examinations for aortic pathology is
described elsewhere in this textbook.
Aortography
Since the development of newer, noninvasive
imaging modalities, there has been a shift away
from invasive techniques for imaging the aorta.
Traditionally, aortography had been the gold
standard for the diagnosis of aortic dissection. Its
primary limitations include its invasive nature
and further risk of intimal damage, the use of
contrast agents, as well as limited visualization of
thrombosed dissections, IMH, and occluded
branch vessels. The specificity for diagnosing
aortic dissection is >95%, but the sensitivity only
averages 90%.2
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
with high-frequency transducers (8–10 MHz) has
been used to complement conventional angiogra-
phy in the diagnosis of acute dissection. IVUS
probes are advanced through guidewire and guid-
ing catheters under fluoroscopy to evaluate the
aorta from inside and provide useful information
about the vessel wall and pathology.
Management
Once there is a suspicion of AAS, patients should
be rapidly stabilized and transported to a tertiary
care center with adequate aortic surgical and
endovascular surgical expertise. It is there that
further imaging and management should take
place. Figure 2.12 provides an algorithm for the
rapid evaluation and treatment of patients
presenting with a suspected AAS.29,34
Fig. 2.11 MRI of the chest showing a descending aortic
dissection
28

PatientsPresentingwithAcuteChestPainandHistoryofHypertension
History&PhysicalExam
EKG,CXR,ABG,Labteststoruleoutacutecoronarysyndrome
Considerothercausesofchestpain
ObtainlargeboreIVAccess&invasivebloodpressuremonitoring
Bloodpressurecontrol
Sendbloodforcrossmatch
ObtainemergentTransthoracicEcho(TTE)inemergencyroom,if
available,whilearrangingforCT,OR,orICUtransport
HemodynamicallyStable
HemodynamicallyUnstable
NoDissection
Nohighriskfeatures
ConfirmedDissection
or
Highriskfeatures
1.Pencardialtamponade
2.Aorticinsufficiency
3.Regionalwallmotionabnormalities
4.Dilatedaorticroot
TocardiacORforairwayprotection
TEEexamination&surgicalexploration
TransfertotheOperatingRoomforsurgeryCTSurgicalConsultAggressivemedicaltherapy
Surgicalconsultif:
-Visceralischemia
-Thrombus
-Aneurysmaldelation
-Pain
-Uncontrolledhtnarepresent
-Marfan’sdiseaseissuspected
AcuteTypeBDissectionorIMHPenetratingUlcerUnstableThoracicAneurysmTypeADissectionorIMH
Obtaincardiacgated,multidetector
CTangiographyofchest,abdomen,&pelvis
Fig.2.12Acuteaorticsyndromemanagementalgorithm(Modiﬁedandreprintedwithpermissionfromthefollowingresources29,34
)
29

Although the treatment of AAS remains a ther-
apeutic challenge, diverse surgical and percutane-
ous strategies continue to evolve. There are many
factors that affect management decision as listed
in Table 2.7. One third of the mortality associated
with AAS is the result of end-organ failure, which
emphasizes the importance of early intervention.
The goal of treatment is to prevent the progres-
sion of the disease and its lethal complications.
The initial management of all patients with
AAS involves pain relief and aggressive blood
pressure control. In normalizing the blood pres-
sure, the goal is to reduce the force of left ven-
tricular ejection (dP/dt), which is the primary
cause of dissection extension and aortic rupture.
Beta-blockers are the preferred agents because
they not only reduce systemic pressure but also
lower heart rate. For most patients, the goal is a
systolic pressure between 100 and 120 mmHg
and heart rate <60 bpm or the lowest tolerable
levels that provide adequate cerebral, coronary,
and renal perfusion. Less is known about the role
of calcium channel blockers for patients who are
-blocker intolerant, but they should reduce
blood pressure without causing reflex tachycar-
dia. If neither of the above agents is adequate to
control the blood pressure, vasodilators may be
added. However, they should never be used as an
initial form of therapy before starting -blockers
because of the reflex tachycardia and increase in
the force of left ventricular ejection leading to
increased aortic wall stress.
Type A Aortic Dissection
Acute ascending aortic pathology (acute dissec-
tion, IMH, and PAU) should be treated as a surgi-
cal emergency because of the possible risk of
life-threatening complications including aortic
rupture, pericardial tamponade, and high early
mortality (Fig. 2.13). Surgery is also aimed
to relieve aortic regurgitation and reestablish
coronary and branch vessel perfusion. Acute type
A dissection has a mortality rate of 1–2% per
hour during the first hours of symptom onset and
without surgical treatment, the mortality rate is
20% by 24 h, 30% by 48 h, 40% at 1 week, and
50% at 1 month.35
Even with surgical treatment,
Table 2.7 Patient factors affecting management
decisions
Disease location – type A or B
Retrograde extension into the arch and/or ascending
aorta
Rupture or impending rupture
Site of entry and reentry
Involvement of side branches
Branch origin from true or false lumen
Risk of end-organ damage
Complications – rupture, coronary occlusion, aortic
insufficiency, neurological
Diameters of the true and false lumens
Areas of normal vessel for stent-graft placement
Fig. 2.13 Management of
acute aortic dissection
sion from Springer4
)
30

the mortality rate is as high as 10% by 24 h and
20% at 1 month.36,37
Aortic arch and descending thoracic intimal
tears are seen in 20–30% of patients with type A
dissection and if left untreated predisposes to
later distal reoperation.38,39
Patients who require
partial or total arch replacement with reconnec-
tion of supraaortic vessels to the graft must often
undergo deep hypothermic circularoty arrest with
antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion. If a
dissection extends into the descending thoracic
aorta, an elephant trunk extension of the arch
graft is an option.40
In a later procedure, the ele-
phant trunk portion of the graft may be connected
to the distal descending aorta, a tubular graft or
endovascular graft. There are reports of endovas-
cular repair of the ascending aorta in highly
selected patients, but this has most often been for
the purpose of temporizing symptoms and pre-
venting disease progression before a more defini-
tive open repair could be performed. It is most
often not possible due to the anatomic restrictions
of securing the graft in the ascending aorta. The
placement of stent grafts has been applied to treat
aortic branch occlusions in both type A and B
acute aortic dissections. In type A dissections
with visceral malperfusion, treatment of the leak-
ing aorta and aortic valve take precedence over
visceral malperfusion. However, patients with
prolonged limb or bowel ischemia may be
unsuitable for proximal aortic surgery, and endo-
vascular treatment to restore perfusion to critical
organs is recommended.
Type B Aortic Dissection
Uncomplicated Type B Dissection
Medical management (analgesics and antihyper-
tensive therapy) still remains the main stay of
therapy for patients with uncomplicated type B
disease. It is safe to treat these patients medically
with close follow-up for ischemic complications,
disease progression, or aneurysmal enlargement.
In a group of 384 patients with type B dissec-
tions, 73% were treated medically with a 10%
in-hospital mortality. Long-term survival is
60–80% at 5 years.3
Surgical repair has not been
shown to improve outcomes in this group of
patients. Recently, a completed randomized study
(Investigation of stent grafts in patients with type
B aortic dissection-INSTEAD) examined the use
of endografts versus medical therapy in uncom-
plicated dissections. The results did not show any
survival benefit at 2 years.41
Complicated Type B Dissections
Complicated type B aortic disease is differentiated
by the presence of a distal malperfusion syndrome
or rapid disease progression. Indications for inter-
vention are similar to those for type A diseases;
the prevention of life-threatening complications
such as organ or limb ischemia, aneurysm expan-
sion and risk of rupture, periaortic blood collec-
tion, intractable pain, aneurysm expansion or
uncontrolled hypertension. The mortality rate for
open surgical repair (graft replacement, fenestra-
tion, or bypass procedures) is 30–35% and even
higher with the presence of visceral malperfu-
sion.42,43
Aortic endovascular grafting may be par-
ticularly beneficial in this group and has shown
improved mortality rates (16%). The goals of
endograft treatment include reconstruction of the
aortic segment containing the entry tear, induction
of thrombosis in the false lumen, and the
reestablishment of flow in the true lumen and
branches.44
In one series, false lumen thrombosis
was achieved in 85–100% of patients.
An additional benefit of stent grafts is the abil-
ity to relieve dynamic and combined static and
dynamic obstructions successfully in compli-
cated acute type B dissections.45,46
Static obstruc-
tions are relieved by placing the graft in the
branch vessel and dynamic obstructions may
benefit from stents in the true lumen. Endografts
have also been used in patients with retrograde
type A dissection with intimal tear in the descend-
ing aorta to induce false lumen thrombosis.47
Surgical treatment may be the only option in
patients with failed endografts or patients unsuit-
able for this less-invasive technique.
With either surgical, endograft, or medical
management, the risk of further dissection is
never eliminated. Therefore, close, regular moni-
toring, most likely with CT imaging, is necessary
to assess for progression or complications.
31

Intramural Hematoma
Type A Disease
The recommended treatment for patients with
Type A IMH is prompt surgical intervention.
Proximal IMH are independently associated with
potential progression to dissection, aneurysm,
and rupture as well as poor clinical outcomes.17
The risk of a nonsurgical approach to type A IMH
demonstrates an early mortality of 55% compared
with 8% following surgical repair.17
However, for
patients with significant comorbidities and
uncomplicated type A IMH (no dissection or inti-
mal tear, thickness less than 11 mm, aortic diam-
eter less than 50 mm), medical treatment with
follow-up imaging and timed surgical interven-
tion has been recommended.
Type B Disease
The management of IMH involving the descend-
ing aorta is similar to that recommended for type
B dissections. The current literature supports
medical management. However, if complications
arise (ulceration, expansion, and dilatation),
endograft placement may be considered although
limited data exists. Endografts may cause erosion
of the intima during the acute phase. IMH of the
descending aorta have been associated with an
in-hospital mortality rate of 10%, similar to that
of type B aortic dissection, further emphasizing
the importance of correct diagnosis and proper
treatment.
Penetrating Aortic Ulcers
There are multiple important factors to identify
when diagnosing PAU. One must determine the
number (single or multiple), location (type A or
B), and associated complications (IMH, dissec-
tion, pseudoaneurysm, and rupture). Type A PAU
should be treated surgically. Medical therapy is
indicated in stable patients with type B PAU.48
Very few centers advocate any surgical interven-
tion in uncomplicated type B patients because
there is a high risk of organ failure and poor
prognosis due to the high likelihood of extensive
atherosclerotic disease. For patients with symp-
tomatic or progressive disease, focal PAU in the
descending aorta are ideal targets for endograft
placement. In a meta-analysis of 58 patients from
13 studies, complete sealing of the ulcer was pos-
sible in 94% of patients. Neurologic complica-
tions were present in 6% and the in-hospital
mortality rate was 5%.49
Long-term results are
not known at this time.
Natural History and Prognosis
The outcomes of patients treated for AAS have
improved significantly, although there still
remains a high mortality rate in the acute phase.
Table 2.8 lists predictors of in-hospital death.50
Early clinical suspicion and greater surgical
expertise appear to be the most important factors
in reducing mortality.
Type A aortic dissections are highly lethal.
Overall, mortality at 1 month is 20% with and
50% without surgical treatment for type A dis-
sections. The risk of death is higher if there are
complications of pericardial tamponade, involve-
ment of the coronary arteries causing acute myo-
cardial ischemia, or a malperfusion syndrome.
Age greater than 70 has been identified as an
independent risk factor for hospital death for
acute type A dissection. Shock, hypotension, and
tamponade are other risk factors for increased
mortality.37
For type B dissections, the overall mortality
rate is 10% with medical treatment. Circulatory
shock and visceral ischemia predispose to a
higher mortality in type B dissection.51
Table 2.8 Predictors of in-hospital death
Age >70
Abrupt onset of pain
Hypotension/cardiac tamponade/shock
Abnormal EKG
Kidney failure
Pulse deficits
Iatrogenic cause
32

Following the acute-phase, mid- to long-term
survival depends not only on the underlying
aortic disease but also other comorbidities. In
patients with surgically corrected type A dissec-
tions, survival differences were based on the
presence or absence of distal false lumen flow. In
one study, the absence of a false lumen was
achieved in 53% of patients compared to 10–20%
in most series. In patients with absent false lumen
flow, the survival was 85% at 6 years compared
to 62% in patients with persistent false lumen
flow.37
At 10 years, the survival rate was 44% for
corrected type A dissections compared to 32% in
medically treated type B dissections.51
The pri-
mary reasons for higher, long-term mortality in
type B dissections were aneurysmal expansion
and rupture. Dilatation in the descending aorta
was greater in medically treated type B dissec-
tions compared to operated type A dissections.
Dilatation occurs at a faster rate in patients with
false lumen flow when compared to absent false
lumen flow in type B dissections.52
Junoven et al.
described rupture in 18% and rapid expansion
requiring surgery in 20% of patients with type B
dissection at 3 years.53
The impact of early endo-
vascular treatment on the long-term survival of
type B dissections is yet to be determined.
In patients with type A IMH, Kaji et al.54
reported that surgery was required in 43% of
patients during the acute phase and, among those
discharged without surgery (57%), complete res-
olution occurred in 40% of patients. Type B IMH
has a better long-term prognosis than type B dis-
sections with 5-year survival reported between
43% and 90%.17,55
Close follow-up with imaging
techniques is recommended in patients undergo-
ing medical treatment to look for complications
(dilatation, pseudoaneurysm formation, and
dissection).
Prevention and Follow-Up
At a time when there is an increasing elderly
population, the awareness of such conditions as
AAS is likely to continue to rise. This is due to
improvements in diagnostic modalities, longer
life expectancy, and longer exposure to elevated
blood pressure. In order to best treat these
patients, continued improvements in diagnostic
imaging and therapeutic strategies are necessary,
and a focus on surveillance and prevention will
further reduce the morbidity and mortality asso-
ciated with aortic pathology.
One possibility for the surveillance of patients
at risk for the development or progression of
AAS is the development of biomarkers, which
would enable serum diagnosis. In addition, this
would provide a fast and economic means of dif-
ferentiating patients who present to the emer-
gency room with chest pain. Possible markers
currently include an assay for circulating smooth
muscle myosin heavy chain protein, soluble elas-
tin fragments and acute-phase reactants such as
C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and D-dimer.
All patients with a known aortic disease
require close surveillance following discharge.
Lifelong treatment of hypertension is required
and regular assessments of the aorta should be
performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as well as
every 6–12 months thereafter, depending on the
aortic size. The most important findings on imag-
ing are aortic diameter, signs of aneurysm forma-
tion, and hemorrhage at surgical anastamosis or
stent-graft sites. The close follow-up emphasizes
the fact that aortic disease progression is not easy
to predict. Repeated surgery is required in
12–30% of patients due to extension or recur-
rence of dissection, aneurysm formation, graft
dehiscence, aortic insufficiency, or infection.26
Conclusion
Significant advances have been made in the diag-
nosis and management of acute aortic dissections
over the past 2 decades. These advancements
have led to a better understanding of aortic pathol-
ogy and led to the discovery of variants that are
collectively termed acute aortic syndrome.
Despite a persistent level of uncertainty in the
diagnosis and management of this lethal disorder,
advances are being made and patient outcomes
are improving.
33

Key Notes
1. The clinical progress of patients with AAS is
unpredictable. A high level of suspicion is
required for early diagnosis and crucial for
patient survival.
2. The most common risk factor for AAS is
hypertension, with men being affected more
often.
3. Any mechanism that causes intimal damage
and leads to weakening of the medial layers
of the aortic wall can result in dissection,
IMH, or PAU.
4. Acute aortic dissection, the most common
etiology of AAS, is characterized by an inti-
mal tear which is often preceded by medial
wall degeneration or cystic medial necrosis.
5. IMH, a variant of aortic dissection, originates
from a disruption of the vasa vasorum within
the media. They are treated similar to dissec-
tions and have a similar prognosis.
6. PAU is associated with atherosclerotic dis-
ease and can lead to dissection or perfora-
tion. Both IMH and PAU are found most
often in the descending aorta.
7. AAS may present in many ways. Most often
there is the sudden onset of severe, sharp
chest pain or back pain.
8. Type A aortic dissections are associated with
high mortality rates and without surgery,
30-day mortality exceeds 50%.
9. Uncomplicated type B dissections have a
30-day mortality of 10% and may be man-
aged medically. Complications require surgi-
cal intervention or endovascular stenting.
10. CT, MRI, and TEE are all accurate in the
diagnosis of AAS.
11. The initial treatment of all patients with AAS
is blood pressure control in order to decrease
the force of left ventricular contraction and
lower the risk of dissection extension or rup-
ture. Beta-blockers are the preferred ﬁrst-line
agent to achieve a systolic pressure <120
mmHg and heart rate <60 bpm.
12. Surgery is the deﬁnitive treatment of type A
acute aortic pathology. The goal is to prevent
life-threatening complications such as aortic
rupture or pericardial tamponade.
13. Medical therapy with -blockers and
antihypertensive agents is the recommended
therapy for patients with uncomplicated type
B aortic dissection, IMH, or PAU.
14. The advent and incorporation of less-invasive
endovascular treatments has opened up new
perspectives in the treatment of acute aortic
disease and continued advances will result in
improved patient outcomes.
References
1. Svensson LG, Labib SB, Eisenhauer AC, Butterly JR.
Intimal tear without hematoma: an important variant
of aortic dissection that can elude current imaging
techniques. Circulation. 1999;99:1331–1336.
2. Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syn-
dromes. Circulation. 2005;112:3802–3813.
3. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The
International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection
(IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA.
2000;283:897–903.
4. Evangelista A, Gonzalez-Alujas T. Pathophysiology
of aortic dissection. In: Rousseau H, Verhoye JP,
Heautot JF, eds. Thoracic aortic Diseases. 1st ed.
Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2006:33–53.
5. Fleck T, Ehrlich M, Czerny M, et al. Intraoperative
iatrogenic type A aortic dissection and perioperative
outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;
5:11–14.
6. Elitz T, Kawohl M, Fritzsche D, et al. Aortic dissec-
tion after previous coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Card Surg. 2003;18:519–523.
7. De Smet JM, Stefanidis C. Acute aortic dissection
after off pump coronary artery surgery. Eur
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:315–317.
8. Okamoto R, Makino K, Saito K, et al. Aorto-
coronary dissection during angioplasty in a patient
with myxedema. Jpn Circ J. 2000 Apr;64(4):316–320.
9. Wyss CA, Steffel J, Lüscher TF. Isolated acute iatro-
genic aortic dissection during percutaneous coronary-
intervention without involvement of the coronary
arteries. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Jul;20(7):380–382.
10. Kpodonu J, Preventza O, Ramaiah VG, et al.
Retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stent-
ing of the descendingthoracic aorta. Is the risk real?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jun;33(6):1014–1018.
Epub 2008 Apr 21.
11. Panten RR, Harrison JK, Warner J, Grocott HP. Aortic
dissection after angioplasty and stenting of an aortic
coarctation:detection by intravascular ultrasonogra-
phy but not transesophageal echocardiography. J Am
Soc Echocardiogr. 2001 Jan;14(1):73–76.
12. Sheldon WS, Vandervoort PM, Black IW, Grimm RA,
Stewart WJ. Aortic intramural hematoma in
patients evaluated for aortic dissection: clinical,
34

echocardiographic,radiologicandpathologicﬁndings.
Circulation. 1994;90(Suppl I):I385.
13. Vilacosta I, de Dios RM, Pinto AG. Aortic intramural
hematoma during coronary angioplasty: insights into
the pathogenesis of intramedial hemorrhage. J Am
Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:403–406.
14. Ganaha F, Miller DC, Sugimoto K, et al. Prognosis of
aortic intramural hematoma with and without pene-
trating atherosclerotic ulcer: a clinical and radiologi-
cal analysis. Circulation. 2002 Jul 16;106(3):
342–348.
15. Nienaber CA, Sievers HH. Intramural hematoma in
acute aortic syndrome: more than on variant of dissec-
tion? Circulation. 2002;106:284–285.
16. Kaji S, Nishigami K, Akasaka T, et al. Prediction of
progression or regression of type A aortic intramural
hematoma bycomputed tomography. Circulation.
1999 Nov 9;100(19 Suppl):II281–II286.
17. Von Kodolitsch Y, Csösz SK, Koschyk DH, et al.
Intramural hematoma of the aorta: predictors of pro-
gression to dissection and rupture. Circulation. 2003
Mar 4;107(8):1158–1163.
18. Hayashi J, Matsuoka Y, Sakamoto I, et al. Penetrating
atherosclerotic ulcer of the aortoa: imaging features
and disease concept. RadioGraphics. 2000;20:
995–1005.
19. Stanson AW, Kazmier FJ, Hollier LH, et al. Penetrating
atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural
history and clinicopathologic correlations. Ann Vasc
Surg. 1986;1:15–23.
20. Vilacosta I, San Román JA, Aragoncillo P, et al.
Penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer: documenta-
tion by transesophagealechocardiography. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1998;32:83–89.
21. Ando Y, Minami H, Muramoto H, Narita M, Sakai S.
Rupture of thoracic aorta caused by penetrating aortic
ulcer. Chest. 1994;106:624–626.
22. Nienaber CA. Pathophysiology of acute aortic syn-
dromes. In: Baliga RR, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher
EM, Eagle KA, eds. Aortic Dissection and Related
Syndromes. 1st ed. NewYork: Springer Science;
2007:17–44.
23. Botta DM, Elefteriades JA. Matrix metalloproteinases
in aortic aneurysm and dissection. In: Elefteriades JA,
ed. Acute Aortic Disease. 1st ed. NewYork: Informa
Healthcare; 2007:131–146.
24. Wooley CF, Sparks EH, Boudoulas H. Aortic pain.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;40:563–589.
25. Ahmad F, Cheshire N, Hamady M. Acute aortic syn-
drome: pathology and therapeutic strategies. Postgrad
Med J. 2006;82:305–312.
26. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC, Inoue T, Ohe Y.
Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiog-
raphy, helical computed tomography, and magnetic
resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dis-
section: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch
Intern Med. 2006;166:1350–1356.
27. Kapustin AJ, Litt HI. Diagnostic imaging for aortic
dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;17:
214–223.
28. Von Kodolitsch Y, Nienbar CA, Dieckmann C, et al.
Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic
syndrome. Am J Med. 2004;116:73–77.
29. Smith AD, Schoenhagen P. CT imaging for acute
aortic syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:7–9.
30. Berger F, Smithuis R, van Delden O. Thoracic Aorta –
the Acute Aortic Syndrome. www.radiologyassistant.
nl/en. Accessed May 25, 2009.
31. Reddy GP. Multidetector CT of acute aortic syndrome.
Imag Decision. 2006;2:22–26.
32. Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA.
Multi-detector row computed tomography: imaging in
acute aortic syndrome. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:1256–1267.
33. Svensson LG. Acute aortic syndromes: time to talk of
many things. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:25–29.
34. Meredith EL, Masani ND. Echocardiography in the
emergency assessment of acute aortic syndromes. Eur
J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:i31–i39.
35. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The
International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection
(IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA.
2000;283:897–903.
36. Mehta RH, O’Gara PT, Bossone E, et al. Acute type A
aortic dissection in the elderly: clinical characteris-
tics, management, and outcomes in the current era.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:685–692.
37. Mehta RH, Suzuki T, Hagan PG, et al. Predicting
death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
Circulation. 2002;105:200–206.
38. Ergin MA, O’Connor J, Guinto R, Griepp RB.
Experience with profound hypothermia and circula-
tory arrest in the treatment of aneurysms of the aortic
arch. Aortic arch replacement for acute arch dissec-
tions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:649–655.
39. Nguyen B, Müller M, Kipfer B, et al. Different tech-
niques of distal aortic repair in acute type A dissec-
tion: impacton late aortic morphology and reoperation.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:496–500.
40. Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic
replacement using elephant trunk prosthesis. Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31:37–40.
41. Isselbacher EM. Dissection of the descending thoracic
aorta: looking into the future. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2007;50:805–807.
42. Heinemann MK, Buehner B, Schaefers HJ, Jurmann
MJ, Laas J, Borst HG. Malperfusion of the thoracoab-
dominal vasculature in aortic dissection. J Card Surg.
1994;9:748–755.
43. Borst HG, Laas J, Heinemann M. Type A aortic dis-
section: diagnosis and management of malperfusion
phenomena. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1991;3:238–241.
44. Ince H, Nienaber CA. The concept of interventional
therapy in acute aortic syndrome. J Card Surg.
2002;17:135–142.
45. Slonim SM, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Semba CP,
Razavi MK, Dake MD. Percutaneous balloon fenes-
tration and stenting for life-threatening ischemic
complications in patients with acute aortic dissection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:1118–1126.
35

46. Slonim SM, Nyman UR, Semba CP, Miller DC,
Mitchell RS, Dake MD. True lumen obliteration in
complicated aortic dissection: endovascular treat-
ment. Radiology. 1996;201:161–166.
47. Kato N, Shimono T, Hirano T, Ishida M, Yada I,
Takeda K. Transluminal placement of endovascular
stent-grafts for the treatment of type A aortic dissec-
tion with an entry tear in the descending thoracic
aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1023–1028.
48. Tittle SL, Lynch RJ, Cole PE, et al. Midterm follow-up
of penetrating ulcer and intramural hematoma of the
aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:1051–1059.
49. Eggebrecht H, Baumgart D, Schmermund A, et al.
Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the aorta: treat-
ment by endovascular stent-graft placement. Curr
Opin Cardiol. 2003;18:431–435.
50. Song JK, Kang SJ, Song JM, et al. Factors associated
with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic
syndrome involving the ascending aorta. Int J Cardiol.
2007;115:14–18.
51. Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection:new
frontiers in diagnosis and management. Circulation.
2003;108:628–635.
52. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Hayashi K, Yamaguchi T,
Imada T. Growth rate of aortic diameter in patients
with type B aortic dissection during the chronic phase.
Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II256–II261.
53. Junoven T, Ergin MA, Galla JD, et al. Risk factors for
rupture of chronic type B dissections. J Thoac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:776–786.
54. Kaji S, Akasaka T, Boribata Y, et al. Long term prog-
nosis of patients with type A intramural hematoma.
Circulation. 2002;106:248–252.
55. Kaji S, Akasaka T, Katayama M, et al. Long term
prognosis of patients with type B intramural hema-
toma. Circulation. 2003;108:307–331.
56. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, et al. Diagnosis and
management of aortic dissection: task force on aortic
dissection, European society of cardiology. Eur Heart
J. 2001;22:1642–1681.
36

http://www.springer.com/978-0-387-85921-7

Anesthesia and perioperative care for aortic surgery

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to Anesthesia and perioperative care for aortic surgery (20)

More from Springer (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Anesthesia and perioperative care for aortic surgery