AREA-DASHBOARD for PIR REVIEW OF SCHOOLS.pptx

AREA-DASHBOARD for PIR REVIEW OF SCHOOLS.pptx

• 1.
  Division Monitoring, Evaluation, andAdjustments Calendar Year 2022 Quarter 2 _____________________________________ Area Focal Person Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LEYTE Place your Division Logo here
• 2.
  Place your Division Logo here Public Schools LEVEL Total Number ofExisting Schools/CLCs Number of Schools/CLCs with Q2 ProMEDS Submission Percentage of Submission Name of schools who did not submit Elementary Junior HS Senior HS Community Learning Centers (CLC) TOTAL 2022 Q2 ProMEDS SUBMISSION TRACKING (3rd Periodic Grading) Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q1 ProMEDS
• 3.
  ACCESS Republic of thePhilippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS
• 4.
  Place your Division Logo here Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS BOSY SY 2021-2022 LEVEL 2ND QUARTER (as of end of 3rd Grading 2022) Variance SPED (Non-Graded) Kindergarten Elementary Junior HS Senior HS ALS TOTAL ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING (Public Schools)
• 5.
  Place your Division Logo here SCHOOLS District BOSY Enrolment Enrolmentas of March 2022 Variance Reason for the Variance ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING Schools with Enrolment Variance
• 6.
  Place your Division Logo here SCHOOLS DISTRICT MADRASAHIPED SPED (GRADED) SPED (Non- GRADED TOTAL ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING Schools implementing IncluEd (as of 3rd Grading)
• 7.
  Place your Division Logo here SCHOOLS DISTRICT SPA (Recognized) SPA (Non- Recognized)SPS SSES SPJ TOTAL ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING Schools implementing Special Curricular Programs(as of 3rd Grading)
• 8.
  LEVEL Number ofLearners Provided with: LSA Volunteer Paid LSA TOTAL SPED Non-Graded Kindergarten Elementary Junior HS Senior HS TOTAL/AVERAGE LEARNING SUPPORT AIDES (LSA) PROVISION PROGRESS TRACKING- Public Schools
• 9.
  Place your Division Logo here Number of Audio- VideoMaterials across Learning Areas/Programs by Grade levels for Quality Assurance SPED Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 SPED Kindergarten IPEd ALIVE Mother Tongue English Science Mathematics Filipino Araling Panlipunan TLE MAPEH EsP Number of 3rd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance (District Level)
• 10.
  Place your Division Logo here Number of Audio-VideoMaterials across Learning Areas/Programs by Grade levels for Quality Assurance G11 G12 Core Subject Applied Subject Specialization GAS HUMSS ABM ARTS & DESIGN TVL TRACK - HE - IA - ICT Number of 3rd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance (District Level)
• 11.
  Place your Division Logo here Schools with 3rdGrading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance (District Level) SCHOOLS DISTRICT
• 12.
  Place your Division Logo here Number of Audio- VideoMaterials across Learning Areas/Programs by Grade levels for Quality Assurance SPED Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 SPED Kindergarten IPEd ALIVE Mother Tongue English Science Mathematics Filipino Araling Panlipunan TLE MAPEH EsP Number of Quality Assured Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas/Program by Grade Levels (District Level)
• 13.
  Place your Division Logo here Number of Audio-VideoMaterials across Learning Areas/Programs by Grade levels for Quality Assurance G11 G12 Core Subject Applied Subject Specialization GAS HUMSS ABM ARTS & DESIGN TVL TRACK - HE - IA - ICT Number of Quality Assured 3rd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade level (District Level)
• 14.
  Place your Division Logo here SCHOOLS DISTRICT Schools withQuality Assured 2nd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels (DISTRICT QUALITY-ASSURED)
• 15.
  Number of LearnersProvided with Learning Resources Schools with below 100% Provision of LRs to Learners vis-à-vis Enrolment Number of Learners Provided with Learning Resources K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 TOTAL SCHOOLS DISTRICT ENROLMENT NO. of LEARNERS PROVIDED with LRs Percentage
• 16.
  QUALITY Republic of thePhilippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS
• 17.
  Number of Learnerswho have completely complied all the Modules required for the quarter SPED Kinderg arten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL SPED Kindergarten SLM IPED ALIVE Mother Tongue English Science Mathematics Filipino Araling Panlipunan TLE MAPEH EsP PERCENTAGE OF LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED ALL THE MODULES REQUIRED FOR THE QUARTER (vs. Enrolment)
• 18.
  REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELYCOMPLYING THE MODULES INTERVENTIONS SUPPORT NEEDED FROM THE DIVISION OFFICE SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELY COMPLYING THE MODULES
• 19.
  Number of Learnerswho have completely complied all the Modules required for the quarter GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL ARTS DESIGN G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 Core Subjects Applied Subjects Specialization PERCENTAGE OF LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE MODULES BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL (vs. Enrolment)
• 20.
  REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELYCOMPLYING THE MODULES INTERVENTIONS SUPPORT NEEDED FROM THE DIVISION OFFICE SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELY COMPLYING THE MODULES
• 21.
  PERCENTAGE OF ELEMENTARYLEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE LAS BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL (vs. Enrolment) Number of Learners who have completely complied all the Modules required for the quarter SPED Kinderg arten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL SPED Kindergarten SLM IPED ALIVE Mother Tongue English Science Mathematics Filipino Araling Panlipunan TLE MAPEH EsP
• 22.
  REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELYCOMPLYING THE MODULES INTERVENTIONS SUPPORT NEEDED FROM THE DIVISION OFFICE SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELY COMPLYING THE LAS
• 23.
  Number of Learnerswho have completely complied all the Modules required for the quarter GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL ARTS DESIGN G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 G11 G12 Core Subjects Applied Subjects Specialization PERCENTAGE OF LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE LAS BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL (vs. Enrolment)
• 24.
  REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELYCOMPLYING THE MODULES INTERVENTIONS SUPPORT NEEDED FROM THE DIVISION OFFICE SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION REASONS FOR NOT COMPLETELY COMPLYING THE LAS
• 25.
  No. Schools DistrictNo. of Learners 1 2 3 4 5 Schools with the Highest Average Number of Kindergarten Learners categorized as BEGINNING based on the quarterly Progress Report
• 26.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries) MOTHER TONGUE
• 27.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) ALIVE Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 28.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) ENGLISH Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 29.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) FILIPINO Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 30.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) MATHEMATICS Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 31.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) SCIENCE Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 32.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) ARALING PANLIPUNAN Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 33.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) ARALING PANLIPUNAN Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 34.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) EPP/TLE Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 35.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) ESP Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 36.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) MAPEH Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 37.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) CORE SUBJECTS Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 38.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) APPLIED SUBJECTS Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 39.
  Percentage of Learnerswho DID NOT MEET EXPECTATION- Below 75% (BOTTOM 5 from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) SPECIALIZATION Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the below 75% Performance (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 40.
  INTERVENTIONS ON THELEARNERS WITH BELOW 75% GRADE RANGE SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 41.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Percentage of Learners CATEGORIZED as NON-NUMERATES BOTTOM 5 (from HIGHEST to LOWEST PERCENTAGE) Schools District Total Enrolment No. of Learners Reasons for the Non-Numerates (Characterize using the Curriculum Support System) *Teachers (competencies covered; contact time; teachers teaching skills, teachers use of learning materials; teachers use of classroom assessment, content mastery) *Materials, Facilities, Equipment (Learners access to materials, learners “contact time” on use of equipment, laboratory, congestions, care & use of equipment, access to library) *ICT Environment (Learners access to internet, teachers use of ICT in teaching & learning, ICT awareness in school, use of blended learning) *Assessment (Tests administered, frequency of test, content versus assessed) *School Leadership & Management (Inst. Supervision, knowledge of curriculum, competencies of Education planning, understanding of inclusive education, Implementation of SBM) *Schools Division TA (Frequency of Division assistance to schools, Type of assistance provided to schools eg. subject areas, assessment, planning & M&E, program mgt, etc) *Community, Industry Relevance & Partnership (Community Involvements, school’s use of local resources, linkages to learning institutions, linkages to industries)
• 42.
  INTERVENTIONS ON THELEARNERS CATEGORIZED AS NON-NUMERATES SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 43.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades MOTHER TONGUE
• 44.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades ENGLISH
• 45.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades SCIENCE
• 46.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades MATH
• 47.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades FILIPINO
• 48.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades ARALING PANLIPUNAN
• 49.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades ARALING PANLIPUNAN
• 50.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades TLE
• 51.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades MAPEH
• 52.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO
• 53.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades CORE SUBJECTS
• 54.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades APPLIED SUBJECTS
• 55.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Average Computed Grades of Learners BOTTOM 5 (from LOWEST to HIGHEST Total Average) Schools District Average Computed Grades SPECIALIZATION
• 56.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Quarterly Competency Tracking Subjects/Learning Areas Grade Level Number of Competencies Covered Percentage of Competency Coverage Number of Least Learned Competencies Mother Tongue Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 AVERAGE English Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Science Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Mathematics Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Quarterly Competence Tracking (FOR ELEMENTARY ONLY)
• 57.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Quarterly Competency Tracking Subjects/Learning Areas Grade Level Number of Competencies Covered Percentage of Competency Coverage Number of Least Learned Competencies Filipino Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Araling Panlipunan Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE TLE- Agriculture Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE TLE- Entrep/ICT Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Quarterly Competence Tracking (FOR ELEMENTARY ONLY)
• 58.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Quarterly Competency Tracking Subjects/Learning Areas Grade Level Number of Competencies Covered Percentage of Competency Coverage Number of Least Learned Competencies TLE- Home Economics Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE TLE- Industrial Arts Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Music Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Arts Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Quarterly Competency Tracking (FOR ELEMENTARY ONLY)
• 59.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Quarterly Competency Tracking Subjects/Learning Areas Grade Level Number of Competencies Covered Percentage of Competency Coverage Number of Least Learned Competencies Physical Education Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Health Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE EsP Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 AVERAGE Quarterly Competence Tracking (FOR ELEMENTARY ONLY)
• 60.
  REASONS & INTERVENTIONSON THE NON-COVERAGE OF COMPETENCIES REASONS FOR THE NON- COVERAGE OF COMPETENCIES SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 61.
  REASONS AND INTERVENTIONSFOR THE LEAST LEARNED COMPETENCIES REASONS FOR THE LEAST LEARNED SKILLS SCHOOL INTERVENTION DISTRICT INTERVENTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 62.
  GOVERNANCE Republic of thePhilippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS
• 63.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Capability Buildings (CBs) conducted and monitored Number of Sessions/CBs conducted Number of Teachers Trained Number of Teaching- Related Staff Trained Number of Non- Teaching Personnel Trained School LAC Sessions INSET related: Content and Pedagogy Assessment Contextualization of LRs Learning Delivery Program/System Implementation
• 64.
  ISSUES & CONCERNSON CAPABILITY BUILDING PROGRAMS ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE C/O HRD, SGOD PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 65.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS District Number of School Heads Standard IS per quarter (no. of SHs x 15 x 3mos) Total # of Instructional Supervisions Provided (Virtual & Face to Face) TOTAL INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION provided by SCHOOL HEADS
• 66.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS District Number of PSDS/DICs/PICs Standard IS per quarter (no. of PSDS/DICs/PICs x 10 x 3mos) Total # of Instructional Supervisions Provided (Virtual & Face to Face) TOTAL INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION provided by PSDS/DICs/PICs
• 67.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS District Number of EDUC. PROGRAM SUPERVISORS Standard IS per quarter (no. of Educ. Prog. Supervisors x 5 x 3mos) Total # of Instructional Supervisions Provided (Virtual & Face to Face) TOTAL INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION provided by EDUCATION PROGRAM SUPERVISORS
• 68.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS District Number of DEPARTMENT HEARDS Standard IS per quarter (no. of Department Heads x standard IS/month/Dept Head x 3mos) Total # of Instructional Supervisions Provided (Virtual & Face to Face) TOTAL INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION provided by DEPARTMENT HEADS
• 69.
  District Number of INSTRUCTIONAL ASSISTANTS Standard ISper quarter (no. of INST. ASSISTANTS x no. of IS/IA/month x 3 mos) Total # of Instructional Supervisions Provided (Virtual & Face to Face) TOTAL INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION provided by INSTRUCTIONAL ASSISTANTS (MASTER TEACHERS)
• 70.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS STAKEHOLDERS DONATION Stakeholders Donation within the quarter Total •Cash •In-kind (converted to cash) * Services Engaged Types of Services Name of Partner Company/Organization/Agency/Private Individual Date of Engagement
• 71.
  ISSUES & CONCERNSON PARTNERSHIP & LINKAGES ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE C/O SMN - SGOD PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 72.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS District Total No. of Schools DISTRICT Validated DIVISION Validated No. of schools with SBM Level 1 No. of schools with SBM Level 2 No. of schools with SBM Level 3 No. of schools with SBM Level 1 No. of schools with SBM Level 2 No. of schools with SBM Level 3 TOTAL SBM IMPLEMENTATION in SCHOOLS
• 73.
  ISSUES & CONCERNSON SBM IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE C/O SBM COOR - SGOD PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 74.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS SMEA Result ( Based on LCP/SIP Implementation DISTRICT Physical Accomplishment Financial Accomplishment Qtr Physical Targets Actual Accomplishment % of Accomplishment Financial Target Amount Utilized % of Utilization TOTAL
• 75.
  ISSUES & CONCERNSON LCP/SIP/AIP & SMEA IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE C/O PLANNING & SCHOOL MGT, M&E - SGOD PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 76.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS SEF UTILIZATION STATUS DISTRICT Total No. of Schools in the District No. of Schools with SEF Total Amount Downloaded Total amount Liquidated % of Liquidation
• 77.
  Data Source: BOSYEBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE ISSUES & CONCERNS ON LCP/SIP/AIP & SMEA IMPLEMENTATION
• 78.
  ISSUES & CONCERNSON SCHOOL BASED FEEDING PROGRAM & OTHER HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAMS ISSUES & CONCERNS ELEVATED TO THE DIVISION OFFICE C/O HEALTH SERVICES, SGOD PROPOSED RESOLUTION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / SUPPORT NEEDED FROM DIVISION OFFICE
• 79.
  THANK YOU! Republic ofthe Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS