Automated testing vs manual testing

Intelligent People. Uncommon Ideas.

Automated Testing vs Manual Testing

By Bhavin Turakhia
CEO, Directi
(shared under Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike License incorporated herein by reference)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)

Manual Tests

• Coding Process with Manual Tests
 Write code
 Uploading the code to some place
 Build it
 Running the code manually (in many cases filling up forms etc
step by step)
 Check Log files, Database, External Services, Values of variable
names, Output on the screen etc
 If it does not work, repeat the above process

Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike 2

Automated Tests

• Coding Process with Automated Unit Tests
 Write one or more test cases
 Auto-compile and run to see the tests fail
 Write code to pass the tests
 Auto-compile and run
 If tests fail -> make appropriate modifications
 If tests pass -> repeat for next method
• Coding Process with Automated Functional Tests
 Finish writing code (with all unit tests passing)
 Write a Functional Test using any tool
 Auto-compile and run
 If tests fail -> make appropriate modifications
 If tests pass -> move ahead


Automated Tests vs Manual Tests

• Effort and Cost
 Lets assume 6 test cases
 Effort required to run all 6 manually => 10 min
 Effort required to write unit tests for all 6 cases => 10 min
 Effort required to run unit tests for all 6 cases => < 1 min
 Number of testing iterations => 5
 Total manual testing time => 50 min
 Total unit testing time => 10 min
Manual Test
Release Manual Test Auto Test Cumulative

1 10 10 10

2 10 0 20

3 10 0 30

4 10 0 40

5 10 0 50



• Effort and Cost
 Adding incremental Unit test cases is cheaper than adding
incremental Manual Test Cases
• Eg registerDomain
 Case 1: Register a .com domain with all correct fields
 Case 2: Register a .com domain with an invalid nameserver



• Manual Testing is boring
 Noone wants to keep filling the same forms
 There is nothing new to learn when one tests manually
 People tend to neglect running manual tests
 Noone maintains a list of the tests required to be run if they are
manual tests
• Automated Tests on the other hand are code
 They are fun and challenging to write
 One has to carefully think of design for reusability and coverage
 They require analytical and reasoning skills
 They represent contribution that is usable in the future



• Manual Testing is not reusable
 The effort required is the same each time
 One cannot reuse a Manual Test
• Automated Tests are completely reusable
 IMPORTANT: One needs to setup a Continuous Integration
Server, a common Code Repository and a organization structure
 Once written the Automated Tests form a part of the codebase
 They can be reused without any additional effort for the lifetime of
the Project



• Manual Tests provide limited Visibility and have to be
Repeated by all Stakeholders
 Only the developer testing the code can see the results
 Tests have to be repeated by each stakeholder
• For eg Developer, Tech Lead, GM, Management
• Automated Tests provide global visibility
 Developers, Tech Leads and Management can login and see Test
Results
 No additional effort required by any of them to see the software
works!!
Manual Manual Manual Dev Manual Total Manual
Testing by Testing by Testing by Total Manual Test Test
Release Dev Team Leads Mgmt Testing Auto Test Cumulative Cumulative
1 10 5 3 18 10 10 18
2 10 5 3 18 0 20 36
3 10 5 3 18 0 30 54
4 10 5 3 18 0 40 72
5 10 5 3 18 0 50 90



• Manual Testing ends up being an Integration Test
 In a typical manual test it is very difficult to test a single unit
 In most circumstances you end up checking the unit alongwith
backend services
 Introduces fragility – if something else breaks the manual test
breaks
• Automated Tests can have varying scopes
 One can test a unit (class / method), a module, a system etc



• Manual Testing requires complex Manual Setup and Tear
Down
 Can involve frequently running db queries
 Can involve making changes to backend servers
 Steps become more complex with multiple dependent test cases
• Automated Tests can have varying scopes and require
less complex setup and teardown
 Unit Tests have external dependencies mocked – so no setup /
teardown required
 Setup and Tear down are automated in Functional Tests using
framework support



• Manual Testing has a high risk of missing out on
something
 Each time a developer runs manual tests it is likely he will miss out
on an important test case
 New developers may have no clue about the battery of tests to be
run
• Automated Tests have zero risk of missing out a pre-
decided test
 Once a Test becomes a part of Continuous Integration – it will run
without someone having to remember to run it



• Manual Tests do not drive design
 Manual tests are run post-facto and hence only drive bug-patching
• Automated Tests and TDD / Test-First development drive
design
 Writing a Unit test first clarifies the requirement and influences
design
 Writing Unit Tests with Mock Objects etc forces clean design and
segregation through abstraction / interfaces / polymorphism etc



• Manual Tests do not provide a safety-net
 Manual tests are run post-facto and hence only drive bug-patching
• Automated Tests provide a safety-net for refactoring /
additions
 Even New developers who have never touched the code can be
confident about making changes



• Manual Tests have no training value
• Automated Tests act as documentation
 Reading a set of Unit Tests clarifies the purpose of a codebase
 They provide a clear contract and define the requirement
 They provide visibility into different use cases and expected results
 A new developer can understand a piece of code much more by
looking at Unit Tests than by looking at the code
 Unit Tests define the expected behavior of the code



• Manual Tests create crazy code clutter
 Most manual testing involves –
• System.outs to check values of variable names
• Useless log file entries in app server, db server etc
• Cause code / log / console clutter
 if then(s), flag based logging, event based log entries etc
• Slows down the application
• Automated Tests reduce code clutter to zero
 Log file entries / System.outs are replaced by assertions in test
code
 Even if specific console / log entries are needed they can reside in
the test and not in the code
 Keep a live application / logs / console clutter-free and fast


Summary

1. Manual Tests take more Effort and Cost more than
Automated Test to write and run
2. Manual Testing is boring
3. Automated Tests are reusable
4. Manual Tests provide limited Visibility and have to be
Repeated by all Stakeholders
5. Automated Tests can have varying scopes and can test
single units of code by Mocking the dependencies
6. Automated tests may require less complex setup and
teardown


Summary

7. Automated Testing ensures you dont miss out on running
a test
8. Automated Testing can actually enforce and drive clean
design decisions
9. Automated Tests provide a Safety Net for refactoring
10.Automated Tests have Training value
11.Automated Tests do not create clutter in
code/console/logs


Why do people not write Automated
Tests
• Initial learning curve
 Understanding Unit Testing Frameworks and Functional Testing
Frameworks
 Understanding Continuous Integration and effective usage of it
 Understanding and learning Code Coverage Tools
 Figuring out how to organize the tests
 How to create Mock Objects?
 How to automate the running of the tests each time?
 Where to commit the tests?
• Am I really going to be working on this same module
again?
• Will my tests be re-used? If not what is the point?


Tests
• Solution
 Spend time during First Release to freeze / design / implement -
• A Code Repository structure that incorporates Unit Tests and
Functional Tests
• A CI Server integrated with the release
• Unit Testing Framework (any xUnit framework)
• Functional Testing Tools (Sahi / Watir / Selenium / QTP etc)
• Code Coverage Tools (Clover)
• Testing guidelines and principles
 Designate Responsibility
• Each developer MUST write Unit tests for multiple use cases per unit
• Designate a specific Developer to write Functional Tests
• The developer who writes the tests is also responsible for organizing
them, committing them and linking them in CI


Tests
• Don’t give up
 If you come across a hurdle, pair
 Make sure you complete your testing responsibility
• Check Code Coverage
 Use code coverage tools while coding and post-coding to check
parts of your code that are covered by tests


What to Test

• Unit Tests
 Ideally do not cross class boundaries
 Definitely do not cross process-boundaries
 Write a unit test with multiple cases
• Functional Tests
 UI Tests using specific tools (Watir / Selenium / QTP / White etc)
 Tests one layer below the UI (Using APIs)


Best Practices

• You must use a unit testing frameworks (there’s one for
every platform)
• You must have an auto-build process, a CI server, auto-
testing upon commits etc
• Unit Tests are locally during the day, and upon commit by
CI Server
• Over a period of time you may want to have your CI
Server run tests selectively
• Tests must be committed alongwith code


Best Practices

• Organize the tests properly
• If you do not commit Tests they are not reusable and the
reduced effort advantage is lost


Intelligent People. Uncommon Ideas.

Visit our Websites
http://careers.directi.com | http://www.directi.com

Automated testing vs manual testing

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (9)

Similar to Automated testing vs manual testing (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Automated testing vs manual testing