Brc auditor check list

F804a: Issue 8 Auditor Checklist/Site Self-Assessment Tool BRC Global Standard for Food Safety
Version 1: August 2018 Page 1 of 123
BRC Global Standard for Food Safety
F804a: Issue 8 Auditor Checklist and
Site Self-Assessment Tool

1 Senior management commitment
1.1 Senior management commitment and continual improvement
Fundamental
SOI
The site’s senior management shall demonstrate they are fully committed to the
implementation of the requirements of the Global Standard for Food Safety and to
processes which facilitate continual improvement of food safety and quality management.
Clause Requirements Conforms Comments
1.1.1
The site shall have a documented
policy which states the site’s intention
to meet its obligation to produce safe,
legal and authentic products to the
specified quality, and its responsibility
to its customers. This shall be:
• signed by the person with
overall responsibility for the
site
• communicated to all staff.
1.1.2
The site’s senior management shall
define and maintain a clear plan for
the development and continuing
improvement of a food safety and
quality culture. This shall include:
• defined activities involving all
sections of the site that have
an impact on product safety
• an action plan indicating how
the activities will be
undertaken and measured,
and the intended timescales
• a review of the effectiveness
of completed activities.
1.1.3
ensure that clear objectives are
defined to maintain and improve the
safety, legality and quality of products

manufactured, in accordance with the
food safety and quality policy and this
Standard. These objectives shall be:
• documented and include
targets or clear measures of
success
• clearly communicated to
relevant staff
• monitored and results
reported at least quarterly to
site senior management.
1.1.4
Management review meetings
attended by the site’s senior
management shall be undertaken at
appropriate planned intervals,
annually at a minimum, to review the
site performance against the Standard
and objectives set in clause 1.1.3. The
review process shall include the
evaluation of:
• previous management review
action plans and timeframes
• the results of internal, second-
party and/or third-party
audits
• any objectives that have not
been met, to understand the
underlying reasons. This
information shall be used
when setting future objectives
and to facilitate continual
improvement
• any customer complaints and
the results of any customer
feedback
• any incidents (including both
recalls and withdrawals),
corrective actions, out-of-
specification results and non-
conforming materials

• the effectiveness of the
systems for HACCP, food
defence and authenticity
• resource requirements.
Records of the meeting shall be
documented and used to revise the
objectives. The decisions and actions
agreed within the review process shall
be effectively communicated to
appropriate staff, and actions
implemented within agreed
timescales.
1.1.5
The site shall have a demonstrable
meeting programme which enables
food safety, legality, integrity and
quality issues to be brought to the
attention of senior management.
These meetings shall occur at least
monthly.
Employees shall be aware of the need
to report any evidence of unsafe or
out-of-specification product or raw
materials, to a designated manager to
enable the resolution of issues
requiring immediate action.
1.1.6
The company shall have a confidential
reporting system to enable staff to
report concerns relating to product
safety, integrity, quality and legality.
The mechanism (e.g. the relevant
telephone number) for reporting
concerns must be clearly
communicated to staff.
The company’s senior management
shall have a process for assessing any
concerns raised. Records of the

assessment and, where appropriate,
actions taken, shall be documented.
1.1.7 The company’s senior management
shall provide the human and financial
resources required to produce food
safely and in compliance with the
requirements of this Standard.
1.1.8
The company’s senior management
shall have a system in place to ensure
that the site is kept informed of and
reviews:
• scientific and technical
developments
• industry codes of practice
• new risks to authenticity of
raw materials
• all relevant legislation in the
country where the product
will be sold (where known).
1.1.9
The site shall have a genuine, original
hard copy or electronic version of the
current Standard available and be
aware of any changes to the Standard
or protocol that are published on the
BRC Global Standards website.
1.1.10
Where the site is certificated to the
Standard, it shall ensure that
announced recertification audits occur
on or before the audit due date
indicated on the certificate.
1.1.11
The most senior production or
operations manager on site shall
participate in the opening and closing
meetings of the audit for certification
to the Standard. Relevant

departmental managers or their
deputies shall be available as required
during the audit.
1.1.12
ensure that the root causes of any
non-conformities against the Standard
identified at the previous audit have
been effectively addressed to prevent
recurrence.
1.1.13
The BRC Global Standards logo and
references to certification status shall
only be used in accordance with the
conditions of use detailed in the audit
protocol section (Part III, section 5.6)
of the Standard.
1.2
Organisational structure, responsibilities and management authority
SOI
The company shall have a clear organisational structure and lines of communication to
enable effective management of product safety, legality and quality.
Clause
Requirements Conforms
1.2.1
The company shall have an
organisation chart demonstrating the
management structure of the
company. The responsibilities for the
management of activities which
ensure food safety, integrity, legality
and quality shall be clearly allocated
and understood by the managers
responsible. It shall be clearly
documented who deputises in the
absence of the responsible person.
1.2.2
ensure that all employees are aware
of their responsibilities. Where
documented work instructions exist
for activities undertaken, the relevant

employees shall have access to these
and be able to demonstrate that work
is carried out in accordance with the
instructions.
2 The food safety plan – HACCP
Fundamental
SOI
The company shall have a fully implemented and effective food safety plan incorporating
the Codex Alimentarius HACCP principles.
2.1 Senior management commitment and continual improvement
Clause Requirements Conforms
2.1.1
The HACCP or food safety plan shall be
developed and managed by a multi-
disciplinary food safety team that
includes those responsible for quality
assurance, technical management,
production operations, engineering
and other relevant functions.
The team leader shall have an in-
depth knowledge of Codex HACCP
principles (or equivalent) and be able
to demonstrate competence,
experience and training. Where there
is a legal requirement for specific
training, this shall be in place.
The team members shall have specific
knowledge of HACCP and relevant
knowledge of products, processes and
associated hazards.
In the event of the site not having the
appropriate in-house knowledge,
external expertise may be used, but
day-to-day management of the food
safety system shall remain the
responsibility of the company.

2.1.2
The scope of each HACCP or food
safety plan, including the products and
processes covered, shall be defined.
2.2 Prerequisite programmes
2.2.1
The site shall establish and maintain
environmental and operational
programmes necessary to create an
environment suitable to produce safe
and legal food products (prerequisite
programmes). As a guide these may
include the following, although this is
not an exhaustive list:
• cleaning and sanitising
• pest management
• maintenance programmes for
equipment and buildings
• personal hygiene
requirements
• staff training
• purchasing
• transportation arrangements
• processes to prevent cross-
contamination
• allergen controls.
The control measures and monitoring
procedures for the prerequisite
programmes must be clearly
documented and shall be included
within the development and reviews
of the HACCP or food safety plan.
2.3 Describe the product (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 2)
2.3.1
A full description for each product or
group of products shall be developed,
which includes all relevant
information on food safety. As a

guide, this may include the following,
although this is not an exhaustive list:
• composition (e.g. raw
materials, ingredients,
allergens, recipe)
• origin of ingredients
• physical or chemical
properties that impact food
safety (e.g. pH, aw)
• treatment and processing (e.g.
cooking, cooling)
• packaging system (e.g.
modified atmosphere,
vacuum)
• storage and distribution
conditions (e.g. chilled,
ambient)
• maximum safe shelf life under
prescribed storage and usage
conditions.
2.3.2
All relevant information needed to
conduct the hazard analysis shall be
collected, maintained, documented
and updated. The company will ensure
that the HACCP or food safety plan is
based on comprehensive information
sources, which are referenced and
available on request. As a guide, this
may include the following, although
this is not an exhaustive list:
• the latest scientific literature
• historical and known hazards
associated with specific food
products
• relevant codes of practice
• recognised guidelines
• food safety legislation
relevant for the production
and sale of products
• customer requirements.

2.4 Identify intended use (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 3)
2.4.1 The intended use of the product by
the customer, and any known
alternative use, shall be described,
defining the consumer target groups,
including the suitability of the product
for vulnerable groups of the
population (e.g. infants, elderly,
allergy sufferers).
2.5 Construct a process flow diagram (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 4)
2.5.1
A flow diagram shall be prepared to
cover each product, product category
or process. This shall set out all
aspects of the food process operation
within the HACCP or food safety plan
scope, from raw material receipt
through to processing, storage and
distribution. As a guide, this should
include the following, although this is
not an exhaustive list:
• plan of premises and
equipment layout
• raw materials, including
introduction of utilities and
other contact materials (e.g.
water, packaging)
• sequence and interaction of
all process steps
• outsourced processes and
subcontracted work
• potential for process delay
• rework and recycling
• low-risk/high-risk/high-care
area segregation
finished products, intermediate/semi-
processed products, by-products and
waste.

2.6 Verify flow diagram (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 5)
2.6.1 The HACCP food safety team shall
verify the accuracy of the flow
diagrams by on-site audit and
challenge at least annually. Daily and
seasonal variations shall be
considered and evaluated. Records of
verified flow diagrams shall be
maintained.
2.7 List all potential hazards associated with each process step, conduct a hazard analysis and
consider any measures to control identified hazards (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius
Step 6, Principle 1)
2.7.1
The HACCP food safety team shall
identify and record all the potential
hazards that are reasonably expected
to occur at each step in relation to
product, process and facilities. This
shall include hazards present in raw
materials, those introduced during the
process or surviving the process steps,
and consideration of the following
types of hazard:
• microbiological
• physical contamination
• chemical and radiological
contamination
• fraud (e.g. substitution or
deliberate/intentional
adulteration)
• malicious contamination of
products
• allergen risks (see clause 5.3).
It shall also take account of the
preceding and following steps in the
process chain.

2.7.2
conduct a hazard analysis to identify
hazards which need to be prevented,
eliminated or reduced to acceptable
levels. Consideration shall be given to
the following:
• likely occurrence of hazard
• severity of the effects on
consumer safety
• vulnerability of those exposed
• survival and multiplication of
micro-organisms of specific
concern to the product
• presence or production of toxins,
chemicals or foreign bodies
• contamination of raw materials,
intermediate/semi-processed
product, or finished product.
Where elimination of the hazard is not
practical, justification for acceptable
levels of the hazard in the finished
product shall be determined and
documented.
consider the control measures
necessary to prevent or eliminate a
food safety hazard or reduce it to an
acceptable level. Where the control is
achieved through existing prerequisite
programmes, this shall be stated and
the adequacy of the programme to
control the specific hazard validated.
Consideration may be given to using
more than one control measure.
2.8 Determine the critical control points (CCPs) (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 7,
Principle 2)
2.8.1 For each hazard that requires control,
control points shall be reviewed to
identify those that are critical. This

requires a logical approach and may
be facilitated by use of a decision tree.
Critical control points (CCPs) shall be
those control points which are
required in order to prevent or
eliminate a food safety hazard or
reduce it to an acceptable level. If a
hazard is identified at a step where
control is necessary for safety but the
control does not exist, the product or
process shall be modified at that step,
or at an earlier step, to provide a
control measure.
2.9 Establish critical limits for each CCP (equivalent to Codes Alimentarius Step 8, Principle 3)
2.9.1
For each CCP, the appropriate critical
limits shall be defined in order to
identify clearly whether the process is
in or out of control. Critical limits shall
be:
• measurable wherever possible
(e.g. time, temperature, pH)
• supported by clear guidance or
examples where measures are
subjective (e.g. photographs).
2.9.2
validate each CCP. Documented
evidence shall show that the control
measures selected and critical limits
identified are capable of consistently
controlling the hazard to the specified
acceptable level.
2.10 Establish a monitoring system for each CCP (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 9,
Principle 4)
2.10.1
A monitoring procedure shall be
established for each CCP to ensure
compliance with critical limits. The
monitoring system shall be able to

detect loss of control of CCPs and,
wherever possible, provide
information in time for corrective
action to be taken. As a guide,
consideration may be given to the
following, although this is not an
exhaustive list:
• online measurement
• offline measurement
• continuous measurement (e.g.
thermographs, pH meters
etc.).
Where discontinuous measurement is
used, the system shall ensure that the
sample taken is representative of the
batch of product.
2.10.2
Records associated with the
monitoring of each CCP shall include
the date, time and result of
measurement and shall be signed by
the person responsible for the
monitoring and verified, when
appropriate, by an authorised person.
Where records are in electronic form,
there shall be evidence that records
have been checked and verified.
2.11 Establish a corrective action plan (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 10, Principle 5)
specify and document the corrective
action to be taken when monitored
results indicate a failure to meet a
control limit, or when monitored
results indicate a trend towards loss of
control. This shall include the action to
be taken by nominated personnel with
regard to any products that have been
manufactured during the period when
the process was out of control.

2.12 Establish verification procedures (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 11, Principle 6)
2.12.1
Procedures of verification shall be
established to confirm that the HACCP
or food safety plan, including controls
managed by prerequisite
programmes, continues to be
effective. Examples of verification
activities include:
• internal audits
• review of records where
acceptable limits have been
exceeded
• review of complaints by
enforcement authorities or
customers
• review of incidents of product
withdrawal or recall.
Results of verification shall be
recorded and communicated to the
HACCP food safety team.
2.13 HACCP documentation and record-keeping (equivalent to Codex Alimentarius Step 12,
Principle 7)
2.13.1
Documentation and record-keeping
shall be sufficient to enable the site to
verify that the HACCP and food safety
controls, including controls managed
by prerequisite programmes, are in
place and maintained.
2.14 Review the HACCP plan
2.14.1
review the HACCP or food safety plan
and prerequisite programmes at least
annually and prior to any changes
which may affect food safety. As a

guide, these may include the
following, although this is not an
exhaustive list:
• change in raw materials or
supplier of raw materials
• change in ingredients/recipe
• change in processing conditions,
process flow or equipment
• change in packaging, storage or
distribution conditions
• change in consumer use
• emergence of a new risk (e.g.
known adulteration of an
ingredient or other relevant,
published information, such as the
recall of a similar product)
• review following a recall
• new developments in scientific
information associated with
ingredients, process or product.
Appropriate changes resulting from
the review shall be incorporated into
the HACCP or food safety plan and/or
prerequisite programmes, fully
documented and the validation
recorded.
Where appropriate, the changes shall
also be reflected in the company’s
product safety policy and food safety
objectives.
3 Food safety and quality management system
3.1 Food safety and quality manual
SOI
The company’s processes and procedures to meet the requirements of this Standard shall
be documented to allow consistent application, facilitate training, and support due
diligence in the production of a safe product.

3.1.1 The site’s procedures, working
methods and practices shall be
collated in the form of a printed or
electronic quality manual.
3.1.2 The food safety and quality manual
shall be fully implemented and the
manual or relevant components shall
be readily available to relevant staff.
3.1.3 All procedures and work instructions
shall be clearly legible, unambiguous,
in appropriate languages and
sufficiently detailed to enable their
correct application by appropriate
staff. This shall include the use of
photographs, diagrams or other
pictorial instructions where written
communication alone is not
sufficient (e.g. there are issues of
literacy or foreign language).
3.2 Document control
SOI
The company shall operate an effective document control system to ensure that only the
correct versions of documents, including recording forms, are available and in use.
3.2.1
The company shall have a procedure
to manage documents which form
part of the food safety and quality
system. This shall include:
• a list of all controlled
documents indicating the
latest version number
• the method for the
identification and
authorisation of controlled
documents
• a record of the reason for
any changes or amendments
to documents

• the system for the
replacement of existing
documents when these are
updated.
Where documents are stored in
electronic form these shall also be:
• stored securely (e.g. with
authorised access, control of
amendments, or password
protected)
• backed up to prevent loss.
3.3 Record completion and maintenance
SOI
The site shall maintain genuine records to demonstrate the effective control of product
safety, legality and quality.
3.3.1
Records shall be legible, maintained
in good condition and retrievable.
Any alterations to records shall be
authorised and justification for the
alteration shall be recorded. Where
records are in electronic form these
shall also be:
• stored securely (e.g. with
authorised access, control of
amendments, or password
protected)
• suitably backed up to prevent
loss.
3.3.2
Records shall be retained for a
defined period with consideration
given to:
• any legal or customer
requirements
• the shelf life of the product.
This shall take into account, where it
is specified on the label, the
possibility that shelf life may be

extended by the consumer (e.g. by
freezing).
At a minimum, records shall be
retained for the shelf life of the
product plus 12 months.
3.4 Internal audits
Fundamental
SOI
The company shall be able to demonstrate that it verifies the effective application of the
food safety plan and the implementation of the requirements of the Global Standard for
Food Safety.
3.4.1
There shall be a scheduled
programme of internal audits.
At a minimum, the programme shall
include at least four different audit
dates spread throughout the year.
The frequency at which each activity
is audited shall be established in
relation to the risks associated with
the activity and previous audit
performance. All activities shall be
covered at least once each year.
At a minimum, the scope of the
internal audit programme shall
include the:
• HACCP or food safety plan,
including the activities to
implement it (e.g. supplier
approval, corrective actions and
verification)
• prerequisite programmes (e.g.
hygiene, pest control)
• food defence and food fraud
prevention plans
• procedures implemented to
achieve the Standard.
Each internal audit within the
programme shall have a defined

scope and consider a specific activity
or section of the HACCP or food
safety plan.
3.4.2
Internal audits shall be carried out by
appropriately trained, competent
auditors. Auditors shall be
independent (e.g. not audit their
own work).
3.4.3
The internal audit programme shall
be fully implemented. Internal audit
reports shall identify conformity as
well as non-conformity and include
objective evidence of the findings.
The results shall be reported to the
personnel responsible for the activity
audited.
Corrective and preventive actions,
and timescales for their
implementation, shall be agreed and
their completion verified.
3.4.4
In addition to the internal audit
programme, there shall be a
separate programme of documented
inspections to ensure that the
factory environment and processing
equipment are maintained in a
suitable condition for food
production. At a minimum, these
inspections shall include:
• hygiene inspections to assess
cleaning and housekeeping
performance
• fabrication inspections to
identify risks to the product from
the building or equipment.
The frequency of these inspections
shall be based on risk but will be no

less than once per month in open
product areas.
3.5 Supplier and raw material approval and performance monitoring
3.5.1 Management of suppliers of raw materials and packaging
Fundamental
SOI
The company shall have an effective supplier approval and monitoring system to ensure
that any potential risks from raw materials (including primary packaging) to the safety,
authenticity, legality and quality of the final product are understood and managed.
3.5.1.1 The company shall undertake a
documented risk assessment of each
raw material or group of raw
materials including primary
packaging to identify potential risks
to product safety, legality and
quality. This shall take into account
the potential for:
• allergen contamination
• foreign-body risks
• microbiological contamination
• chemical contamination
• variety or species cross-
contamination
• substitution or fraud (see clause
5.4.2)
• any risks associated with raw
materials which are subject to
legislative control.
Consideration shall also be given to
the significance of a raw material to
the quality of the final product.
The risk assessment shall form the
basis for the raw material
acceptance and testing procedure
and for the processes adopted for
supplier approval and monitoring.

The risk assessment for a raw
material shall be updated:
• when there is a change in a raw
material, the processing of a raw
material, or the supplier of a raw
material
• if a new risk emerges
• following a product recall or
withdrawal, where a specific raw
material has been implicated
• at least every 3 years.
3.5.1.2 The company shall have a
documented supplier approval
procedure to ensure that all
suppliers of raw materials, including
primary packaging, effectively
manage risks to raw material quality
and safety and are operating
effective traceability processes. The
approval procedure shall be based
on risk and include either one or a
combination of:
• a valid certification to the
applicable BRC Global Standard
or GFSI-benchmarked standard.
The scope of the certification
shall include the raw materials
purchased
• supplier audits, with a scope to
include product safety,
traceability, HACCP review and
good manufacturing practices,
undertaken by an experienced
and demonstrably competent
product safety auditor. Where
the supplier audit is completed
by a second or third party, the
company shall be able to:
− demonstrate the
competency of the
auditor

− confirm that the
scope of the audit
includes product
safety, traceability,
HACCP review and
good manufacturing
practices
− obtain and review a
copy of the full audit
report
or
• where a valid risk-based
justification is provided and the
supplier is assessed as low risk
only, a completed supplier
questionnaire may be used for
initial approval. The
questionnaire shall have a scope
that includes product safety,
and it shall have been reviewed
and verified by a demonstrably
competent person.
3.5.1.3 There shall be a documented process
for ongoing supplier performance
review, based on risk and defined
performance criteria. The process
shall be fully implemented.
Where approval is based on
questionnaires, these shall be
reissued at least every 3 years and
suppliers shall be required to notify
the site of any significant changes in
the interim, including any change in
certification status.
Records of the review shall be kept.
3.5.1.4 The site shall have an up-to-date list
or database of approved suppliers.
This may be on paper (hard copy) or

it may be controlled on an electronic
system.
The list or relevant components of
the database shall be readily
available to the relevant staff (e.g. at
goods receipt).
3.5.1.5 Where raw materials (including
primary packaging) are purchased
from companies that are not the
manufacturer, packer or
consolidator (e.g. purchased from an
agent, broker or wholesaler), the site
shall know the identity of the last
manufacturer or packer, or for bulk
commodity products the
consolidation place of the raw
material.
Information to enable the approval
of the manufacturer, packer or
consolidator, as in clauses 3.5.1.1
and 3.5.1.2, shall be obtained from
the agent/broker or directly from the
supplier, unless the agent/broker is
themselves certificated to a BRC
Standard (e.g. BRC Global Standard
for Agents and Brokers) or a
standard benchmarked by GFSI.
3.5.1.6 The company shall ensure that its
suppliers of raw materials (including
primary packaging) have an effective
traceability system. Where a supplier
has been approved based on a
questionnaire instead of certification
or audit, verification of the supplier’s
traceability system shall be carried
out on first approval and then at
least every 3 years. This may be
achieved by a traceability test.
Where a raw material is received
directly from a farm or fish farm,

further verification of the farm’s
traceability system is not mandatory.
3.5.1.7 The procedures shall define how
exceptions to the supplier approval
processes in clause 3.5.1.2 are
handled (e.g. where raw material
suppliers are prescribed by a
customer) or where information for
effective supplier approval is not
available (e.g. bulk agricultural
commodity products) and instead
product testing is used to verify
product quality and safety.
When a site produces customer-
branded product, the customer shall
be made aware of the relevant
exceptions.
3.5.2 Raw material and packaging acceptance, monitoring and management procedures
SOI Controls on the acceptance of raw materials (including primary packaging) shall ensure that
these do not compromise the safety, legality or quality of products and where appropriate
any claims of authenticity.
3.5.2.1 The company shall have a procedure
for the acceptance of raw materials
and primary packaging on receipt
based upon the risk assessment
(clause 3.5.1.1). Acceptance of raw
materials (including primary
packaging) and their release for use
shall be based on either one or a
combination of:
• product sampling and testing
• visual inspection on receipt
• certificates of analysis (specific
to the consignment)
• certificates of conformance.
A list of raw materials (including
primary packaging) and the
requirements to be met for

acceptance shall be available. The
parameters for acceptance and
frequency of testing shall be clearly
defined, implemented and reviewed.
3.5.2.2 Procedures shall be in place to
ensure that approved changes to
raw materials (including primary
packaging) are communicated to
goods receipt personnel and that
only the correct version of the raw
material is accepted. For example,
when labels or printed packaging
have been amended, only the
correct version should be accepted
and released into production.
3.5.2.3 Where the site is in receipt of live
animals, there shall be an inspection
by a suitably competent individual at
lairage and post mortem to ensure
that the animals are fit for human
consumption.
3.5.3 Management of suppliers of services
SOI The company shall be able to demonstrate that where services are outsourced, the service
is appropriate and any risks presented to food safety, legality and quality have been
evaluated to ensure effective controls are in place.
3.5.3.1 There shall be a procedure for the
approval and monitoring of suppliers
of services. Such services shall
include, as appropriate:
• pest control
• laundry services
• contracted cleaning
• contracted servicing and
maintenance of equipment
• transport and distribution
• off-site storage of ingredients,
packaging or products

• off-site packing of products
• laboratory testing
• catering services
• waste management.
This approval and monitoring
process shall be risk-based and take
into consideration:
• risk to the safety and quality of
products
• compliance with any specific
legal requirements
• potential risks to the security of
the product (i.e. risks identified
in the vulnerability and food
defence assessments).
3.5.3.2 Contracts or formal agreements shall
exist with the suppliers of services
that clearly define service
expectations and ensure that the
potential food safety risks associated
with the service have been
addressed.
3.5.4 Management of outsourced processing
SOI Where any process step in the manufacture of a product is outsourced to a third party or
undertaken at another site, this shall be managed to ensure it does not compromise the
safety, legality, quality or authenticity of the product.
3.5.4.1 The company shall be able to
demonstrate that, where part of the
production process or any part of
the final packing is outsourced and
undertaken off-site, this has been
declared to the brand owner and,
where required, approval granted.
3.5.4.2 The company shall ensure that
outsourced processors are approved
and monitored, to ensure that they
effectively manage risks to product

safety and quality and are operating
effective traceability processes.
The approval and monitoring
procedure shall be based on risk and
include either one or a combination
of:
applicable BRC Global Standard
or GFSI-benchmarked standard.
The scope of the certification
shall include the raw materials
purchased
or
• supplier audits, with a scope to
include product safety,
undertaken by an experienced
and demonstrably competent
product safety auditor. Where
this supplier audit is completed
by a second or third party, the
− demonstrate the
competency of the
auditor
− confirm that the
scope of the audit
includes product
safety, traceability,
HACCP review and
good manufacturing
practices
− obtain and review a
copy of the full audit
report.
There shall be a documented process
for ongoing supplier performance
review, based on risk and defined
performance criteria. The process

shall be fully implemented. Records
of the review shall be kept.
3.5.4.3 Any outsourced processing
operations shall:
• be undertaken in accordance
with established contracts which
clearly define any processing
and/or packing requirements
and product specification
• maintain product traceability.
3.5.4.4 The company shall establish
inspection and test procedures for
products where part of the
processing has been outsourced,
including visual, chemical and/or
microbiological testing.
The frequency and methods of
inspection or testing shall depend on
risk assessment.
3.6 Specifications
SOI Specifications shall exist for raw materials (including primary packaging), finished products
and any product or service which could affect the integrity of the finished product.
3.6.1 Specifications for raw materials and
primary packaging shall be adequate
and accurate and ensure compliance
with relevant safety and legislative
requirements. The specifications
shall include defined limits for
relevant attributes of the material
which may affect the quality or
safety of the final products (e.g.
chemical, microbiological or physical
standards).
3.6.2 Accurate, up-to-date specifications
shall be available for all finished
products. These may be in the form

of a printed or electronic document,
or part of an online specification
system.
They shall include key data to meet
customer and legal requirements
and assist the user in the safe usage
of the product.
3.6.3 Where the company is
manufacturing customer-branded
products, it shall seek formal
agreement of the finished product
specifications. Where specifications
are not formally agreed then the
company shall be able to
demonstrate that it has taken steps
to ensure formal agreement is in
place.
3.6.4 Specification review shall be
sufficiently frequent to ensure that
data is current or at a minimum
every 3 years, taking into account
product changes, suppliers,
regulations and other risks.
Reviews and changes shall be
documented.
3.7 Corrective and preventative actions
Fundamental
SOI
The site shall be able to demonstrate that it uses the information from identified failures in
the food safety and quality management system to make necessary corrections and
prevent recurrence.
3.7.1 The site shall have a procedure for
handling and correcting failures
identified in the food safety and
quality management system.
3.7.2 Where a non-conformity places the
safety, legality or quality of products

at risk, this shall be investigated and
recorded including:
• clear documentation of the non-
conformity
• assessment of consequences by
a suitably competent and
authorised person
• the action to address the
immediate issue
• an appropriate timescale for
correction
• the person responsible for
correction
• verification that the correction
has been implemented and is
effective.
3.7.3 The site shall have a procedure for
the completion of root cause
analysis. At a minimum root cause
analysis shall be used to implement
ongoing improvements and to
prevent recurrence of non-
conformities when:
• analysis of non-conformities for
trends shows there has been a
significant increase in a type of
non-conformity
• a non-conformity places the
safety, legality or quality of a
product at risk.
3.8 Control of non-conforming product
SOI The site shall ensure that any out-of-specification product is effectively managed to
prevent unauthorised release.
3.8.1 There shall be procedures for
managing non-conforming products.
These procedures shall include:

• the requirement for staff to
identify and report a
potentially non-conforming
product
• clear identification of a non-
conforming product (e.g.
direct labelling or the use of
IT systems)
• secure storage to prevent
accidental release (e.g.
physical or computer-based
isolation)
• referral to the brand owner
where required
• defined responsibilities for
decision-making on the use
or disposal of products
appropriate to the issue (e.g.
destruction, reworking,
downgrading to an
alternative label or
acceptance by concession)
• records of the decision on
the use or disposal of the
product
records of destruction where a
product is destroyed for food safety
reasons.
3.9 Traceability
Fundamental
SOI
The site shall be able to trace all raw material product lots (including primary packaging)
from its suppliers through all stages of processing and dispatch to its customers and vice
versa.
3.9.1 The site shall have a documented
traceability procedure designed to
maintain traceability throughout the
site’s processes. At a minimum this
shall include:

• how the traceability system
works
• the labelling and records
required.
3.9.2 Identification of raw materials
(including primary packaging),
products, part-used materials,
finished products and materials
pending investigation shall be
adequate to ensure traceability.
3.9.3 The site shall test the traceability
system across the range of product
groups to ensure traceability can be
determined from the supplier of raw
material (including primary
packaging) to the finished product
and vice versa, including quantity
check/mass balance.
The traceability test shall include a
summary of the documents that
should be referenced during the test,
and clearly show the links between
them. The test shall occur at a
predetermined frequency, at a
minimum annually, and results shall
be retained for inspection.
Traceability should be achievable
within 4 hours.
3.9.4 Where rework or any reworking
operation is performed, traceability
shall be maintained.
3.10 Complaint-handling
SOI Customer complaints shall be handled effectively and information used to reduce recurring
complaint levels.
3.10.1 All complaints shall be recorded,
investigated and the results of the

investigation of the issue recorded
where sufficient information is
provided. Actions appropriate to the
seriousness and frequency of the
problems identified shall be carried
out promptly and effectively by
appropriately trained staff.
3.10.2 Complaint data shall be analysed for
significant trends. Where there has
been a significant increase in a
complaint or a serious complaint,
root cause analysis shall be used to
implement ongoing improvements
to product safety, legality and
quality, and to avoid recurrence. This
analysis shall be made available to
relevant staff.
3.11 Management of incidents, product withdrawal and product recall
SOI The company shall have a plan and system in place to manage incidents effectively and
enable the withdrawal and recall of products should this be required.
3.11.1 The company shall have procedures
designed to report and effectively
manage incidents and potential
emergency situations that impact
food safety, legality or quality. This
shall include consideration of
contingency plans to maintain
product safety, quality and legality.
Incidents may include:
• disruption to key services such
as water, energy, transport,
refrigeration processes, staff
availability and communications
• events such as fire, flood or
natural disaster
• malicious contamination or
sabotage

• failure of, or attacks against,
digital cyber-security.
Where products which have been
released from the site may be
affected by an incident,
consideration shall be given to the
need to withdraw or recall products.
3.11.2 The company shall have a
documented product withdrawal
and recall procedure. This shall
include, at a minimum:
• identification of key personnel
constituting the recall
management team, with clearly
identified responsibilities
• guidelines for deciding whether
a product needs to be recalled or
withdrawn and the records to be
maintained
• an up-to-date list of key contacts
(including out-of-hours contact
details) or reference to the
location of such a list (e.g. recall
management team, emergency
services, suppliers, customers,
certification body, regulatory
authority)
• a communication plan including
the provision of information to
customers, consumers and
regulatory authorities in a timely
manner
• details of external agencies
providing advice and support as
necessary (e.g. specialist
laboratories, regulatory
authority and legal expertise)
• a plan to handle the logistics of
product traceability, recovery or
disposal of affected product, and
stock reconciliation

• a plan to record timings of key
activities
• a plan to conduct root cause
analysis and to implement
ongoing improvements, to avoid
recurrence.
The procedure shall be capable of
being operated at any time.
3.11.3 The product recall and withdrawal
procedures shall be tested, at least
annually, in a way that ensures their
effective operation. Results of the
test shall be retained and shall
include timings of key activities. The
results of the test and of any actual
recall shall be used to review the
procedure and implement
improvements as necessary.
3.11.4 In the event of a significant food
safety incident, including a product
recall or regulatory food safety non-
conformity (e.g. a regulatory
enforcement notice), the
certification body issuing the current
certificate for the site against this
Standard shall be informed within 3
working days.
4 Site standards
4.1 External Standards
SOI
The production site shall be of suitable size, location and construction, and be maintained
to reduce the risk of contamination and facilitate the production of safe and legal finished
products.
4.1.1 Consideration shall be given to
local activities and the site
environment, which may have an

adverse impact on finished
product integrity, and measures
shall be taken to prevent
contamination. Where measures
have been put into place to
protect the site (from potential
contaminants, flooding etc.), they
shall be reviewed in response to
any changes.
4.1.2 The external areas shall be
maintained in good order. Where
grassed or planted areas are
located near buildings, they shall
be regularly tended and well
maintained. External traffic
routes under site control shall be
suitably surfaced and maintained
in good repair to mitigate the risk
of contamination of the product.
4.1.3 The building fabric shall be
maintained to minimise potential
for product contamination (e.g.
elimination of bird-roosting sites,
sealing gaps around pipes to
prevent pest entry, ingress of
water and other contaminants).
4.2 Site Security and Food Defence
SOI
Systems shall protect products, premises and brands from malicious actions while under
the control of the site.
4.2.1
The company shall undertake a
documented risk assessment
(threat assessment) of the
potential risks to products from
any deliberate attempt to inflict
contamination or damage. This
threat assessment shall include

both internal and external
threats.
The output from this assessment
shall be a documented threat
assessment plan. This plan shall
be kept under review to reflect
changing circumstances and
market intelligence. It shall be
formally reviewed at least
annually and whenever:
• a new risk emerges (e.g. a
new threat is publicised or
identified)
• an incident occurs, where
product security or food
defence is implicated.
4.2.2 Where raw materials or products
are identified as being at
particular risk, the threat
assessment plan shall include
controls to mitigate these risks.
Where prevention is not sufficient
or possible, systems shall be in
place to identify any tampering.
These controls shall be
monitored, the results
documented, and the controls
reviewed at least annually.
4.2.3 Areas where a significant risk is
identified shall be defined,
monitored and controlled. These
shall include external storage and
intake points for products and
raw materials (including
packaging).
Policies and systems shall be in
place to ensure that only
authorised personnel have access
to production and storage areas,

and that access to the site by
employees, contractors and
visitors is controlled. A visitor
recording system shall be in
place.
Staff shall be trained in site
security procedures and food
defence.
4.2.4 Where required by legislation, the
site shall maintain appropriate
registrations with the relevant
authorities.
4.3 Layout, product flow and segregation
Fundamental
SOI
The factory layout, flow of processes and movement of personnel shall be sufficient to
prevent the risk of product contamination and to comply with relevant legislation.
4.3.1
There shall be a map of the site.
At a minimum, this map shall
define:
• access points for personnel
• access points for raw
materials (including
packaging), semi-finished
products and open products
• routes of movement for
personnel
• routes of movement for raw
packaging)
• routes for the removal of
waste
• routes for the movement of
rework
• location of any staff facilities,
including changing rooms,
toilets, canteens and smoking
areas

• production process flows.
4.3.2
Contractors and visitors, including
drivers, shall be made aware of all
procedures for access to premises
and the requirements of the
areas they are visiting, with
special reference to hazards and
potential product contamination.
Contractors working in product
processing or storage areas shall
be the responsibility of a
nominated person.
4.3.3
The movement of personnel, raw
materials, packaging, rework
and/or waste shall not
compromise the safety of
products. The process flow,
together with the use of
demonstrably effective
procedures, shall be in place to
minimise the risk of the
contamination of raw materials,
products, packaging and finished
products.
4.3.4
Premises shall allow sufficient
working space and storage
capacity to enable all operations
to be carried out properly under
safe hygienic conditions.
4.3.5
Temporary structures constructed
during building work or
refurbishment etc. shall be
designed and located to avoid
pest harbourage and ensure the
safety and quality of products.
4.4 Building fabric, raw material handling, preparation, processing, packing and storage areas

SOI
The fabrication of the site, buildings and facilities shall be suitable for the intended
purpose.
4.4.1
Walls shall be finished and
maintained to prevent the
accumulation of dirt, minimise
condensation and mould growth,
and facilitate cleaning.
4.4.2
Floors shall be suitably hard-
wearing to meet the demands of
the process, and withstand
cleaning materials and methods.
They shall be impervious, be
maintained in good repair and
facilitate cleaning.
4.4.3
Drainage, where provided, shall
be sited, designed and
maintained to minimise risk of
product contamination and not
compromise product safety.
Machinery and piping shall be
arranged so that, wherever
feasible, process waste water
goes directly to drain. Where
significant amounts of water are
used, or direct piping to drain is
not feasible, floors shall have
adequate falls to cope with the
flow of any water or effluent
towards suitable drainage.
4.4.4
Ceilings and overheads shall be
constructed, finished and
maintained to prevent the risk of
product contamination.
4.4.5
Where suspended ceilings or roof
voids are present, adequate
access to the void shall be
provided to facilitate inspection

for pest activity, unless the void is
fully sealed.
4.4.6
Where elevated walkways are
adjacent to or pass over
production lines, they shall be:
• designed to prevent
contamination of products
and production lines
• easy to clean
• correctly maintained.
4.4.7
Where there is a risk to product,
windows and roof glazing which
are designed to be opened for
ventilation purposes shall be
adequately screened to prevent
the ingress of pests.
4.4.8
Doors (both internal and external)
shall be maintained in good
condition. At a minimum:
• external doors and dock
levellers shall be close fitting
or adequately proofed
• external doors to open
product areas shall not be
opened during production
periods except in
emergencies
• where external doors to
enclosed product areas are
opened, suitable precautions
shall be taken to prevent pest
ingress.
4.4.9
Suitable and sufficient lighting
shall be provided for correct
operation of processes,
inspection of product and
effective cleaning.
4.4.10
Adequate ventilation and
extraction shall be provided in

product storage and processing
environments to prevent
condensation or excessive dust.
4.5 Utilities – water, ice, air and other gases
SOI
Utilities used within the production and storage areas shall be monitored to effectively
control the risk of product contamination.
4.5.1 All water (including ice and
steam) used as a raw material in
the manufacture of processed
food, the preparation of product,
hand-washing or for equipment
or plant cleaning shall be supplied
in sufficient quantity, be potable
at point of use or pose no risk of
contamination according to
applicable legislation. The
microbiological and chemical
quality of water shall be analysed
at least annually. The sampling
points, scope of the test and
frequency of analysis shall be
based on risk, taking into account
the source of the water, on-site
storage and distribution facilities,
previous sample history and
usage.
4.5.2 An up-to-date schematic diagram
shall be available of the water
distribution system on site,
including holding tanks, water
treatment and water recycling as
appropriate. The diagram shall be
used as a basis for water sampling
and the management of water
quality.
4.5.3 Air and other gases used as an
ingredient or that are in direct
contact with products shall be
monitored to ensure this does not

represent a contamination risk.
Compressed air that is in direct
contact with the product shall be
filtered at point of use.
4.6 Equipment
SOI All food-processing equipment shall be suitable for the intended purpose and shall be used
to minimise the risk of contamination of product.
4.6.1 All equipment shall be
constructed of appropriate
materials. The design and
placement of equipment shall
ensure it can be effectively
cleaned and maintained.
4.6.2 Equipment that is in direct
contact with food shall be
suitable for food contact and
meet legal requirements where
applicable.
4.7 Maintenance
SOI An effective maintenance programme shall be in operation for plant and equipment to
prevent contamination and reduce the potential for breakdowns.
4.7.1 There shall be a documented
planned maintenance schedule or
condition monitoring system
which includes all plant and
processing equipment. The
maintenance requirements shall
be defined when commissioning
new equipment.
4.7.2 In addition to any planned
maintenance programme, where
there is a risk of product
contamination by foreign bodies

arising from equipment damage,
the equipment shall be inspected
at predetermined intervals, the
inspection results documented
and appropriate action taken.
4.7.3 Where temporary repairs are
made, these shall be documented
and controlled to ensure that the
safety or legality of products is
not jeopardised. These temporary
measures shall be permanently
repaired as soon as practicable
and within a defined timescale.
4.7.4 The site shall ensure that the
safety or legality of products is
not jeopardised during
maintenance and subsequent
cleaning operations. Maintenance
work shall be followed by a
documented hygiene clearance
procedure.
Equipment and machinery shall
be inspected by an authorised
member of staff to confirm the
removal of contamination
hazards, before being accepted
back into operation.
4.7.5 Materials and parts used for
equipment and plant
maintenance shall be of an
appropriate grade or quality.
Those materials (such as
lubricating oil) that pose a risk by
direct or indirect contact with raw
materials (including primary
packaging), intermediate
products and finished products
shall be food grade and of a
known allergen status.

4.7.6 Engineering workshops shall be
kept clean and tidy, and controls
shall be in place to prevent
transfer of engineering debris to
production or storage areas.
4.8 Staff facilities
SOI Staff facilities shall be sufficient to accommodate the required number of personnel, and
shall be designed and operated to minimise the risk of product contamination. The facilities
shall be maintained in good and clean condition.
4.8.1 Designated changing facilities
shall be provided for all
personnel, whether staff, visitor
or contractor. These shall be sited
to allow direct access to the
production, packing or storage
areas without recourse to any
external area. Where this is not
possible, a risk assessment shall
be carried out and procedures
implemented accordingly (e.g. the
provision of cleaning facilities for
footwear).
4.8.2 Storage facilities of sufficient size
to accommodate personal items
shall be provided for all personnel
who work in raw material
handling, preparation, processing,
packing and storage areas.
4.8.3 Outdoor clothing and other
personal items shall be stored
separately from production
clothing within the changing
facilities. Facilities shall be
available to separate clean and
dirty production clothing.
4.8.4 Suitable and sufficient hand-
washing facilities shall be

provided at access to, and at
other appropriate points within,
production areas. Such hand-
washing facilities shall provide, at
a minimum:
• advisory signs to prompt
hand-washing
• a sufficient quantity of water
at a suitable temperature
• water taps with hands-free
operation
• liquid/foam soap
• single-use towels or suitably
designed and located air
driers.
4.8.5 Toilets shall be adequately
segregated and shall not open
directly into production or
packing areas. Toilets shall be
provided with hand-washing
facilities comprising:
• basins with soap and water at
a suitable temperature
• adequate hand-drying
facilities
• advisory signs to prompt
hand-washing.
Where hand-washing facilities
within toilet facilities are the only
facilities provided before re-
entering production, the
requirements of clause 4.8.4 shall
apply and signs shall be in place
to direct people to hand-washing
facilities before entering
production.
4.8.6 Where smoking is allowed under
national law, designated
controlled smoking areas shall be
provided which are both isolated

from production areas to an
extent that ensures smoke cannot
reach the product and fitted with
sufficient extraction to the
exterior of the building. Adequate
arrangements for dealing with
smokers’ waste shall be provided
at smoking facilities, both inside
and at exterior locations.
Electronic cigarettes shall not be
permitted to be used or brought
into production or storage areas.
4.8.7 All food brought into
manufacturing premises by staff
shall be appropriately stored in a
clean and hygienic state. No food
shall be taken into storage,
processing or production areas.
Where eating of food is allowed
outside during breaks, this shall
be in suitable designated areas
with appropriate control of
waste.
4.8.8 Where catering facilities
(including vending machines) are
provided on the premises, they
shall be suitably controlled to
prevent contamination of
products (e.g. as a source of food
poisoning or introduction of
allergenic material to the site).
4.9 Chemical and physical product contamination control: raw material handling, preparation,
processing, packing and storage areas
SOI Appropriate facilities and procedures shall be in place to control the risk of chemical or
physical contamination of product.
4.9.1 Chemical control

4.9.1.1 Processes shall be in place to
manage the use, storage and
handling of non-food chemicals to
prevent chemical contamination.
These shall include, at a
minimum:
• an approved list of chemicals
for purchase
• availability of material safety
data sheets and specifications
• confirmation of suitability for
use in a food-processing
environment
• avoidance of strongly scented
products
• the labelling and/or
identification of containers of
chemicals at all times
• a designated storage area
with restricted access to
authorised personnel
• use by trained personnel
only.
4.9.1.2 Where strongly scented or taint-
forming materials have to be
used, for instance for building
work, procedures shall be in place
to prevent the risk of taint
contamination of products.
4.9.2 Metal control
4.9.2.1 There shall be a documented
policy for the controlled use and
storage of sharp metal
implements including knives,
cutting blades on equipment,
needles and wires. This shall
include a record of inspection for
damage and the investigation of

any lost items. Snap-off blade
knives shall not be used.
4.9.2.2 The purchase of ingredients and
packaging which use staples or
other foreign-body hazards as
part of the packaging materials
shall be avoided.
Staples, paper clips and drawing
pins shall not be used in open
product areas.
Where staples or other items are
present as packaging materials or
closures, appropriate precautions
shall be taken to minimise the risk
of product contamination.
4.9.3 Glass, brittle plastic, ceramics and similar materials
4.9.3.1 Glass or other brittle materials
shall be excluded or protected
against breakage in areas where
open products are handled or
there is a risk of product
contamination.
4.9.3.2 Procedures for handling glass and
other brittle materials (other than
product packaging) shall be in
place where open products are
handled or there is a risk of
product contamination. These
procedures shall include, at a
minimum:
• a list of items detailing
location, number, type and
condition
• recorded checks of the
condition of items, carried
out at a specified frequency

that is based on the level of
risk to the product
• details on cleaning or
replacing items to minimise
the potential for product
contamination.
4.9.3.3 Procedures detailing the action to
be taken in case of breakage of
glass or other brittle items shall
be implemented and include the
following:
• training of staff in the correct
procedure
• quarantining the products
and production area that
were potentially affected
• cleaning the production area
• inspecting the production
area and authorising
production to continue
• changing of workwear and
inspection of footwear
• specifying those staff
authorised to carry out the
above points
• recording the breakage
incident
• safely disposing of
contaminated product.
4.9.3.4 Where they pose a risk to
product, glass windows shall be
protected against breakage.
4.9.3.5 Where they pose a risk to
product, bulbs and strip lights
(including those on electric fly-
killer devices) shall be adequately
protected. Where full protection
cannot be provided, alternative
management such as wire-mesh

screens or monitoring procedures
shall be in place.
4.9.4 Products packed into glass or other brittle containers
4.9.4.1 The storage of the containers
shall be segregated from the
storage of raw materials, product
or other packaging.
4.9.4.2 Systems shall be in place to
manage container breakages
between the container
cleaning/inspection point and
container closure. This shall
include, at a minimum,
documented instructions which
ensure:
• the removal and disposal of
at-risk products in the vicinity
of the breakage; this may be
specific for different
equipment or areas of the
production line
• the effective cleaning of the
line or equipment which may
be contaminated by
fragments of the container;
cleaning shall not result in the
further dispersal of
fragments, for instance by the
use of high-pressure water or
air
• the use of dedicated, clearly
identifiable cleaning
equipment (e.g. colour-
coded) for removal of
container breakages; such
equipment shall be stored
separately from other
cleaning equipment

• the use of dedicated,
accessible, lidded waste
containers for the collection
of damaged containers and
fragments
• a documented inspection of
production equipment is
undertaken following the
cleaning of a breakage to
ensure cleaning has
effectively removed any risk
of further contamination
• authorisation is given for
production to restart
following cleaning
• the area around the line is
kept clear of broken glass.
4.9.4.3 Records shall be maintained of all
container breakages on the line.
Where no breakages have
occurred during a production
period, this shall also be
recorded. This record shall be
reviewed to identify trends and
potential line or container
improvements.
4.9.5 Wood
4.9.5.1 Wood should not be used in open
product areas except where this
is a process requirement (e.g.
maturation of products in wood).
Where the use of wood cannot be
avoided, the condition of wood
shall be continually monitored to
ensure it is in good condition and
free from damage or splinters
which could contaminate
products.

4.9.6 Other physical contaminants
prevent physical contamination of
raw materials by raw material
packaging (e.g. during debagging
and deboxing procedures to
remove the packaging).
4.9.6.2 Pens used in open product areas
shall be controlled to minimise
the risk of physical contamination
(e.g. designed without small parts
and detectable by foreign-body
detection equipment).
4.10 Foreign-body detection and removal equipment
SOI
The risk of product contamination shall be reduced or eliminated by the effective use of
equipment to remove or detect foreign bodies
4.10.1 Selection and operation of foreign-body detection and removal equipment
4.10.1.1 A documented assessment in
association with the HACCP study
shall be carried out on each
production process to identify the
potential use of equipment to
detect or remove foreign-body
contamination. Typical
equipment to be considered may
include:
• filters
• sieves
• metal detection
• magnets
• optical sorting equipment
• X-ray detection equipment
• other physical separation
equipment (e.g. gravity

separation, fluid bed
technology).
4.10.1.2 The type, location and sensitivity
of the detection and/or removal
method shall be specified as part
of the site’s documented system.
Industry best practice shall be
applied with regard to the nature
of the ingredient, material,
product and/or the packed
product. The location of the
equipment or any other factors
influencing the sensitivity of the
equipment shall be validated and
justified.
4.10.1.3 The site shall ensure that the
frequency of the testing of the
foreign-body detection and/or
removal equipment is defined
and takes into consideration:
• specific customer
requirements
• the site’s ability to identify,
hold and prevent the release
of any affected materials,
should the equipment fail.
The site shall establish and
implement corrective action and
reporting procedures in the event
of a failure of the foreign-body
detector and/or removal
equipment. Action shall include a
combination of isolation,
quarantining and re-inspection of
all products produced since the
last successful test or inspection.
4.10.1.4 Where foreign material is
detected or removed by the
equipment, the source of any
unexpected material shall be
investigated. Information on

rejected materials shall be used
to identify trends and, where
possible, instigate preventive
action to reduce the occurrence
of contamination by the foreign
material.
4.10.2 Filters and sieves
4.10.2.1
Filters and sieves used for
foreign-body control shall be of a
specified mesh size or gauge and
designed to provide the
maximum practical protection for
the product.
4.10.2.2 Filters and sieves shall be
regularly inspected or tested for
damage at a documented
frequency based on risk. Records
shall be maintained of the checks.
Where defective filters or sieves
are identified this shall be
recorded and the potential for
contamination of products
investigated and appropriate
action taken.
4.10.3 Metal detectors and X-ray equipment
4.10.3.1
Metal detection equipment shall
be in place unless risk assessment
demonstrates that this does not
improve the protection of final
products from metal
contamination. Where metal
detectors are not used
justification shall be documented.
The absence of metal detection
would only normally be based on
the use of an alternative, more

effective method of protection
(e.g. use of X-ray, fine sieves or
filtration of products).
4.10.3.2 The metal detector or X-ray
equipment shall incorporate one
of the following:
• an automatic rejection
device, for continuous in-line
systems, which shall either
divert contaminated product
out of the product flow or to
a secure unit accessible only
to authorised personnel
• a belt stop system with an
alarm where the product
cannot be automatically
rejected (e.g. for very large
packs)
• in-line detectors which
identify the location of the
contaminant to allow
effective segregation of the
affected product.
4.10.3.3 The site shall establish and
implement procedures for the
operation and testing of the
metal detection or X-ray
equipment. This shall include, at a
minimum:
• responsibilities for the testing
of equipment
• the operating effectiveness
and sensitivity of the
equipment and any variation
to this for particular products
• the methods and frequency
of checking the detector
• recording of the results of
checks.

4.10.3.4 Metal detector testing
procedures shall, at a minimum,
include:
• use of test pieces
incorporating a sphere of
metal of a known diameter
selected on the basis of risk.
The test pieces shall be
marked with the size and type
of test material contained
• tests carried out using
separate test pieces
containing ferrous metal,
stainless steel and typically
non-ferrous metal, unless the
product is within a foil
container where a ferrous-
only test may be applicable
• a test to prove that both the
detection and rejection
mechanisms are working
effectively under normal
working conditions
• tests of the metal detector by
passing successive test packs
through the unit at typical
line operating speed
• checks of failsafe systems
fitted to the detection and
rejection systems.
In addition, where metal
detectors are incorporated on
conveyors, the test piece shall be
passed as close as possible to the
centre of the metal detector
aperture. Wherever possible, the
test piece shall be inserted within
a clearly identified sample pack of
the food being produced at the
time of the test.
Where in-line metal detectors are
used, the test piece shall be

placed in the product flow
wherever this is possible and the
correct timing of the rejection
system to remove identified
contamination shall be validated.
Testing of in-line metal detectors
shall be completed during both
line start-up and at the end of the
production period.
4.10.4 Magnets
4.10.4.1
The type, location and strength of
magnets shall be fully
documented. Procedures shall be
in place for the inspection,
cleaning, strength testing and
integrity checks. Records of all
checks shall be maintained.
4.10.5 Optical sorting equipment
4.10.5.1 Each unit shall be checked in
accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions or
recommendations. Checks shall
be documented.
4.10.6 Container cleanliness – glass jars, cans and other rigid containers
4.10.6.1 Based on risk assessment,
procedures shall be implemented
to minimise foreign-body
contamination originating from
the packaging container (e.g. jars,
cans and other pre-formed rigid
containers). This may include the
use of covered conveyors,
container inversion and foreign-

body removal through rinsing
with water or air jets.
4.10.6.2 The effectiveness of the
container-cleaning equipment
shall be checked and recorded
during each production. Where
the system incorporates a
rejection system for dirty or
damaged containers, the check
shall incorporate a test of both
the detection and effective
rejection of the test container.
4.11 Housekeeping and hygiene
Fundamental
SOI
Housekeeping and cleaning systems shall be in place which ensure appropriate standards
of hygiene are maintained at all times and the risk of product contamination is minimised.
4.11.1 The premises and equipment
shall be maintained in a clean and
hygienic condition.
4.11.2 Documented cleaning procedures
shall be in place and maintained
for the building, plant and all
equipment. Cleaning procedures
for the processing equipment and
food contact surfaces shall, at a
minimum, include:
• responsibility for cleaning
• item/area to be cleaned
• frequency of cleaning
• method of cleaning, including
dismantling equipment for
cleaning purposes where
required
• cleaning chemicals and
concentrations
• cleaning materials to be used

• cleaning records and
responsibility for verification.
The frequency and methods of
cleaning shall be based on risk.
The procedures shall be
implemented to ensure
appropriate standards of cleaning
are achieved.
4.11.3 Limits of acceptable and
unacceptable cleaning
performance shall be defined for
food contact surfaces and
processing equipment. These
limits shall be based on the
potential hazards relevant to the
product or processing area (e.g.
microbiological, allergen, foreign-
body contamination or product-
to-product contamination).
Therefore, acceptable levels of
cleaning may be defined by visual
appearance, ATP bioluminescence
techniques (see glossary),
microbiological testing, allergen
testing or chemical testing as
appropriate.
The site shall define the
corrective action to be taken
when monitored results are
outside of the acceptable limits.
Where cleaning procedures are
part of a defined prerequisite
plan to control the risk of a
specific hazard, the cleaning and
disinfection procedures and their
frequency shall be validated and
records maintained. This shall
include the risk from cleaning

chemical residues on food contact
surfaces.
4.11.4 The resources for undertaking
cleaning shall be available. Where
it is necessary to dismantle
equipment for cleaning purposes
or to enter large equipment for
cleaning, this shall be
appropriately scheduled and,
where necessary, planned for
non-production periods. Cleaning
staff shall be adequately trained
or engineering support provided
where access within equipment is
required for cleaning.
4.11.5 The cleanliness of equipment
shall be checked before
equipment is released back into
production. The results of checks
on cleaning, including visual,
analytical and microbiological
checks, shall be recorded and
used to identify trends in cleaning
performance and to instigate
improvements where required.
4.11.6 Cleaning equipment shall be:
• hygienically designed and fit
for purpose
• suitably identified for
intended use (e.g. colour-
coded or labelled)
• cleaned and stored in a
hygienic manner to prevent
contamination.
4.11.7 Cleaning in place (CIP)
4.11.7.1 All CIP equipment shall be
designed and constructed to

ensure effective operation. This
shall include:
• validation confirming the
correct design and operation
of the system
• an up-to-date schematic
diagram of the layout of the
CIP system
• where rinse solutions are
recovered and reused, an
assessment of the risk of
cross-contamination (e.g. due
to the re-introduction of
allergen).
Alterations or additions to the CIP
system shall be authorised by a
suitably competent individual
before changes are made. A
record of changes shall be
maintained.
The system shall be revalidated at
a frequency based on risk, and
following any alteration or
addition.
4.11.7.2 Limits of acceptable and
unacceptable performance for
key process parameters shall be
defined to ensure the removal of
target hazards (e.g. soil, allergens,
micro-organisms, spores). At a
minimum these parameters shall
include:
• times for each stage
• detergent concentrations
• flow rate and pressure
• temperatures.
These shall be validated and
records of the validation
maintained.

4.11.7.3 The CIP equipment shall be
maintained by suitably trained
staff to ensure effective cleaning
is carried out. This shall include:
• detergent concentrations
shall be checked routinely
• recovered post-rinse
solutions shall be monitored
for build-up of carry-over
from the detergent tanks
• filters, where fitted, shall be
cleaned and inspected at a
defined frequency
• where used, flexible hoses
shall be stored hygienically
when not in use, and
inspected at a defined
frequency to ensure that they
are in good condition.
4.11.7.4 CIP facilities, where used, shall be
monitored at a defined frequency
based on risk. This may include:
• monitoring of process
parameters defined in clause
4.11.7.2
• ensuring correct connections,
piping and settings are in
place
• confirming the process is
operating correctly (e.g.
valves opening/closing
sequentially)
• ensuring effective completion
of the cleaning cycle
• monitoring for effective
results, including draining
where required.
Procedures shall define the action
to be taken if monitoring

indicates that processing is
outside the defined limits.
4.11.8 Environmental monitoring
SOI Risk-based environmental monitoring programmes shall be in place for pathogens or
spoilage organisms. At a minimum, these shall include all production areas with open and
ready-to-eat products.
4.11.8.1 The design of the environmental
monitoring programme shall be
based on risk, and at a minimum
include:
• sampling protocol
• identification of sample
locations
• frequency of tests
• target organism(s) (e.g.
pathogens, spoilage
organisms and/or indicator
organisms)
• test methods (e.g. settle
plates, rapid testing and
swabs)
• recording and evaluation of
results.
The programme and its
associated procedures shall be
documented.
4.11.8.2 Appropriate control limits shall be
defined for the environmental
monitoring programme.
The company shall document the
corrective action to be taken
when monitored results indicate
a failure to meet a control limit,
or when monitored results
indicate an upward trend of
positive results.

4.11.8.3 The company shall review the
environmental monitoring
programme at least annually and
whenever there are:
• changes in processing
conditions, process flow
or equipment
• new developments in
scientific information
• failures of the
programme to identify a
significant issue (e.g.
regulatory authority tests
identifying positive
results which the site
programme did not)
• product failures (products
with positive tests)
consistently negative results (e.g.
a site with a long history of
negative results should review its
programme to consider whether
the correct parts of the factory
are being tested, whether the
testing is being conducted
correctly, whether the tests are
for the appropriate organisms,
etc.).
4.12 Waste/waste disposal
SOI Waste disposal shall be managed in accordance with legal requirements and to prevent
accumulation, risk of contamination and the attraction of pests.
4.12.1 Where licensing is required by
law for the removal of waste, it
shall be removed by licensed
contractors and records of
removal shall be maintained and
available for audit.

4.12.2 Internal and external waste
collection containers and rooms
housing waste facilities shall be
managed to minimise risk. These
shall be:
• clearly identified
• designed for ease of use and
effective cleaning
• well maintained to allow
cleaning and, where required,
disinfection
• emptied at appropriate
frequencies.
External waste containers shall be
covered or doors kept closed as
appropriate.
4.12.3 If unsafe products or substandard
trademarked materials are
transferred to a third party for
destruction or disposal, that third
party shall be a specialist in
secure product or waste disposal
and shall provide records which
include the quantity of waste
collected for destruction or
disposal.
4.13 Management of surplus food and products for animal feed
SOI Effective processes shall be in place to ensure the safety and legality of by-products of the
primary processing activity of the site.
4.13.1 Surplus customer-branded
products shall be disposed of in
accordance with customer-
specific requirements. Customer
brand names shall be removed
from packed surplus products
under the control of the factory
before the product enters the

supply chain, unless otherwise
authorised by the customer.
4.13.2 Where customer-branded
products which do not meet
specifications are sold to staff or
passed on to charities or other
organisations, this shall be with
the prior consent of the brand
owner. Processes shall be in place
to ensure that all products are fit
for consumption and meet legal
requirements.
4.13.3 By-products and
downgraded/surplus products
intended for animal feed shall be
segregated from waste and
protected from contamination
during storage. Products for
animal feed shall be managed in
accordance with the relevant
legislative requirements.
4.14 Pest management
SOI The whole site shall have an effective preventive pest management programme in place to
minimise the risk of infestation and resources shall be available to respond rapidly to any
issues which occur to prevent risk to products.
Pest management programmes shall comply with all applicable legislation.
4.14.1 If pest activity is identified, it shall
not present a risk of
contamination to products, raw
materials or packaging.
The presence of any infestation
on site shall be documented in
pest management records and be
part of an effective pest control
programme to eliminate or
manage the infestation so that it

does not present a risk to
products, raw materials or
packaging.
4.14.2 The site shall either contract the
services of a competent pest
management organisation or
have appropriately trained staff
for the regular inspection and
treatment of the site to deter and
eradicate infestation.
The frequency of inspections shall
be determined by risk assessment
and shall be documented. The risk
assessment shall be reviewed
whenever:
• there are changes to the
building or production
processes which could have
an impact on the pest
management programme
• there has been a significant
pest issue.
Where the services of a pest
management contractor are
employed, the service scope shall
be clearly defined and reflect the
activities of the site.
Service provision regardless of
the source shall meet with all
applicable regulatory
requirements.
4.14.3 Where a site undertakes its own
pest management, it shall be able
to effectively demonstrate that:
• pest management operations
are undertaken by trained
and competent staff with
sufficient knowledge to select

appropriate pest control
chemicals and proofing
methods and understand the
limitations of use, relevant to
the biology of the pests
associated with the site
• staff undertaking pest
management activities meet
any legal requirements for
training or registration
• sufficient resources are
available to respond to any
infestation issues
• there is ready access to
specialist technical
knowledge when required
• legislation governing the use
of pest control products is
understood and complied
with
• dedicated locked facilities are
used for the storage of
pesticides.
4.14.4 Pest management documentation
and records shall be maintained.
At a minimum, this shall include:
• an up-to-date plan of the full
site, identifying pest control
devices and their locations
• identification of the baits
and/or monitoring devices on
site
• clearly defined
responsibilities for the site
management and the
contractor
• details of pest control
products used, including
instructions for their effective
use and action to be taken in
case of emergencies
• any observed pest activity

• details of pest control
treatments undertaken.
Records may be on paper (hard
copy) or controlled on an
electronic system (e.g. an online
reporting system).
4.14.5 Bait stations or other rodent
monitoring or control devices
shall be appropriately located and
maintained to prevent
contamination risk to product.
Toxic rodent baits shall not be
used within production or storage
areas where open product is
present except when treating an
active infestation. Where toxic
baits are used, these shall be
secured.
Any missing bait stations shall be
recorded, reviewed and
investigated.
4.14.6 Insect-killing devices, pheromone
traps and/or other insect
monitoring devices shall be
appropriately sited and
operational. If there is a danger of
insects being expelled from a fly-
killing extermination device and
contaminating the product,
alternative systems and
equipment shall be used.
4.14.7 The site shall have adequate
measures in place to prevent
birds from entering buildings or
roosting above loading or
unloading areas.
4.14.8 In the event of infestation, or
evidence of pest activity,
immediate action shall be taken

to identify at-risk products and to
minimise the risk of product
contamination. Any potentially
affected products should be
subject to the non-conforming
product procedure.
4.14.9 Records of pest management
inspections, pest proofing and
hygiene recommendations and
actions taken shall be maintained.
It shall be the responsibility of the
site to ensure that all of the
relevant recommendations made
by its contractor or in-house
expert are carried out in a timely
manner.
4.14.10 An in-depth, documented pest
management survey shall be
undertaken at a frequency based
on risk, but at least annually, by a
pest control expert to review the
pest management measures in
place. The survey shall:
• provide an in-depth
inspection of the facility for
pest activity
• review the existing pest
management measures in
place and make any
recommendations for change.
The survey shall be timed to allow
access to equipment for
inspection where a risk of stored
product insect infestation exists.
4.14.11 Results of pest management
inspections shall be assessed and
analysed for trends on a regular
basis. At a minimum, results of
inspections shall be analysed:

• annually or
• in the event of an infestation.
The analysis shall include results
from trapping and monitoring
devices to identify problem areas.
The analysis shall be used as a
basis for improving the pest
management procedures.
4.14.12 Employees shall understand the
signs of pest activity and be
aware of the need to report any
evidence of pest activity to a
designated manager.
4.15 Storage facilities
SOI All facilities used for the storage of raw materials, packaging, in-process products and
finished products shall be suitable for purpose.
4.15.1 Procedures to maintain product
safety and quality during storage
shall be developed on the basis of
risk assessment, understood by
relevant staff and implemented
accordingly. These may include,
as appropriate:
• managing chilled and frozen
product transfer between
temperature-controlled areas
• segregation of products
where necessary to avoid
cross-contamination
(physical, microbiological or
allergens) or taint uptake
• storing materials off the floor
and away from walls
• specific handling or stacking
requirements to prevent
product damage.

4.15.2 Where appropriate, packaging
shall be stored away from other
raw materials and finished
product. Any part-used packaging
materials suitable for use shall be
effectively protected from
contamination and clearly
identified to maintain traceability
before being returned to an
appropriate storage area.
4.15.3 Where temperature control is
required (e.g. for raw materials,
semi-finished materials or final
products), the storage area shall
be capable of maintaining
product temperature within
specification and operated to
ensure specified temperatures
are maintained. Temperature
recording equipment with
suitable temperature alarms shall
be fitted to all storage facilities or
there shall be a system of
recorded manual temperature
checks, typically on at least a 4-
hourly basis or at a frequency
which allows for intervention
before product temperatures
exceed defined limits for the
safety, legality or quality of
products.
4.15.4 Where controlled atmosphere
storage is required, the storage
conditions shall be specified and
effectively controlled. Records
shall be maintained of the storage
conditions.
4.15.5 Where storage outside is
necessary, items shall be
protected from contamination
and deterioration. Items shall be

checked for suitability before
being brought into the factory.
4.15.6 The site shall facilitate correct
stock rotation of raw materials,
intermediate products and
finished products in storage and
ensure that materials are used in
the correct order in relation to
their manufacturing date and
within the prescribed shelf life.
4.16 Dispatch and transport
SOI Procedures shall be in place to ensure that the management of dispatch and of the vehicles
and containers used for transporting products from the site do not present a risk to the
safety, security or quality of the products.
4.16.1 Procedures to maintain product
safety and quality during loading
and transportation shall be
developed and implemented.
These may include, as
appropriate:
• controlling temperature of
loading dock areas and
vehicles
• the use of covered bays for
vehicle loading or unloading
• securing loads on pallets to
prevent movement during
transit
• inspection of loads prior to
dispatch.
4.16.2 All vehicles or containers used for
the transport of raw materials
and the dispatch of products shall
be fit for purpose. This shall
ensure that they are:
• in a clean condition

• free from strong odours
which may cause taint to
products
• in a suitable condition to
prevent damage to products
during transit
• equipped to ensure any
temperature requirements
can be maintained
throughout transportation.
Records of inspections shall be
maintained.
4.16.3 Where temperature control is
required, the transport shall be
capable of maintaining product
temperature within specification,
under minimum and maximum
load. Temperature data-logging
devices which can be interrogated
to confirm time/temperature
conditions or a system to monitor
and record at predetermined
frequencies the correct operation
of refrigeration equipment shall
be used and records maintained.
4.16.4 Maintenance systems and
documented cleaning procedures
shall be available for all vehicles
and equipment used for
loading/unloading. There shall be
records of the measures taken.
4.16.5 The company shall have
procedures for the transport of
products, which shall include:
• any restrictions on the use of
mixed loads
• requirements for the security
of products during transit,
particularly when vehicles are
parked and unattended

• clear instructions in the case
of vehicle breakdown,
accident or failure of
refrigeration systems, which
ensure that the safety of the
products is assessed and
records maintained.
4.16.6 Where the company employs
third-party contractors, all the
requirements specified in this
section shall be clearly defined in
the contract or terms and
conditions and verified, or the
contracted company shall be
certificated to the Global
Standard for Storage and
Distribution or similar GFSI-
recognised scheme.
5 Product control
5.1 Product design/development
SOI
Product design and development procedures shall be in place for new products or
processes and any changes to product, packaging or manufacturing processes to ensure
that safe and legal products are produced.
5.1.1 The company shall provide clear
guidelines on any restrictions to
the scope of new product
developments to control the
introduction of hazards which
would be unacceptable to the
site or customers (e.g. the
introduction of allergens, glass
packaging or microbiological
risks).
5.1.2 All new products and changes to
product formulation, packaging
or methods of processing shall

be formally approved by the
HACCP team leader or
authorised HACCP committee
member. This shall ensure that
hazards have been assessed and
suitable controls, identified
through the HACCP system, are
implemented. This approval shall
be granted before products are
introduced into the factory
environment.
5.1.3 Trials using production
equipment shall be carried out
where it is necessary to validate
that product formulation and
manufacturing processes are
capable of producing a safe
product of the required quality.
5.1.4 Initial shelf-life trials shall be
undertaken using documented
protocols that reflect conditions
expected during manufacture,
storage, transport/distribution,
use and handling to determine
product shelf life.
Results shall be recorded and
retained and shall confirm
compliance with the relevant
microbiological, chemical and
organoleptic criteria/sensory
analysis. Where shelf-life trials
prior to production are
impractical, for instance for
some long-life products, a
documented science-based
justification for the assigned
shelf life shall be produced.
5.2 Product labelling

SOI
Product labelling shall comply with the appropriate legal requirements and contain
information to enable the safe handling, display, storage and preparation of the product
within the food supply chain or by the customer.
5.2.1
All products shall be labelled to
meet legal requirements for the
designated country of use and
shall include information to
allow the safe handling, display,
storage, preparation and use of
the product within the food
supply chain or by the customer.
There shall be a process to verify
that ingredient and allergen
labelling is correct based on the
product recipe and ingredient
specifications.
5.2.2 There shall be effective
processes in place to ensure that
labelling information is reviewed
whenever changes occur to:
• the product recipe
• raw materials
• the supplier of raw materials
• the country of origin of raw
materials
• legislation.
5.2.3 Where a product is designed to
enable a claim to be made to
satisfy a consumer group (e.g. a
nutritional claim, reduced
sugar), the company shall ensure
that the product formulation
and production process are fully
validated to meet the stated
claim.
5.2.4 Where the label information is
the responsibility of a customer
or a nominated third party, the

company shall provide
information:
• to enable the label to be
accurately created
• whenever a change occurs
which may affect the label
information.
5.2.5 Where cooking instructions are
provided to ensure product
safety, they shall be fully
validated to ensure that, when
the product is cooked according
to the instructions, a safe, ready-
to-eat product is consistently
produced.
5.3 Management of allergens
Fundamental
SOI
The site shall have a system for the management of allergenic materials which minimises
the risk of allergen contamination of products and meets legal requirements for labelling in
the country of sale.
5.3.1
The site shall carry out an
assessment of raw materials to
establish the presence and
likelihood of contamination by
allergens (see glossary). This
shall include a review of the raw
material specifications and,
where required, the acquisition
of additional information from
suppliers (e.g. through
questionnaires to understand
the allergen status of the raw
material, its ingredients and the
factory in which it is produced).
5.3.2
The company shall identify and
list allergen-containing materials
handled on site. This shall
include raw materials,
processing aids, intermediate

and finished products, and any
new product development
ingredients or products.
5.3.3
A documented risk assessment
shall be carried out to identify
routes of contamination and
establish documented policies
and procedures for handling raw
materials and intermediate and
finished products to ensure
cross-contamination (cross-
contact) is avoided. This
assessment shall include:
• consideration of the physical
state of the allergenic
material (i.e. powder, liquid,
particulate)
• identification of potential
points of cross-
contamination (cross-
contact) through the process
flow
• assessment of the risk of
allergen cross-contamination
(cross-contact) at each
process step
• identification of suitable
controls to reduce or
eliminate the risk of cross-
contamination (cross-
contact).
5.3.4
Procedures shall be established
to ensure the effective
management of allergenic
materials to prevent cross-
contamination (cross-contact) of
products not containing the
allergen. These shall include, as
appropriate:
• physical or time segregation
while allergen-containing

materials are being stored,
processed or packed
• the use of separate or
additional protective
overclothing when handling
allergenic materials
• use of identified, dedicated
equipment and utensils for
processing
• scheduling of production to
reduce changes between
products containing an
allergen and products not
containing the allergen
• systems to restrict the
movement of airborne dust
containing allergenic
material
• waste handling and spillage
controls
• restrictions on food brought
onto site by staff, visitors
and contractors and for
catering purposes.
5.3.5
Where rework is used, or
reworking operations are carried
out, procedures shall be
implemented to ensure rework
containing allergens is not used
in products that do not already
contain the allergen.
5.3.6
Where a justified, risk-based
assessment demonstrates that
the nature of the production
process is such that cross-
contamination (cross-contact)
from an allergen cannot be
prevented, a warning should be
included on the label. National
guidelines or codes of practice
shall be used when making such
a warning statement.

5.3.7
Where a claim is made regarding
the suitability of a food for
allergy or food sensitivity
sufferers, the site shall ensure
that the production process is
fully validated to meet the
stated claim and the
effectiveness of the process is
routinely verified. This shall be
documented.
5.3.8
Equipment or area-cleaning
procedures shall be designed to
remove or reduce to acceptable
levels any potential cross-
contamination (cross-contact) by
allergens. The cleaning methods
shall be validated to ensure that
they are effective and the
effectiveness of the procedure
routinely verified. Cleaning
equipment used to clean
allergenic materials shall either
be identifiable and specific for
allergen use, single use, or
effectively cleaned after use.
5.4 Product authenticity, claims and chain of custody
SOI
Systems shall be in place to minimise the risk of purchasing fraudulent or adulterated food
raw materials and to ensure that all product descriptions and claims are legal, accurate and
verified.
5.4.1
The company shall have
processes in place to access
information on historical and
developing threats to the supply
chain which may present a risk
of adulteration or substitution of
raw materials (i.e. fraudulent
raw materials). Such information
may come from, for example:

• trade associations
• government sources
• private resource centres.
5.4.2
A documented vulnerability
assessment shall be carried out
on all food raw materials or
groups of raw materials to
assess the potential risk of
adulteration or substitution. This
shall take into account:
• historical evidence of
substitution or adulteration
• economic factors which may
make adulteration or
substitution more attractive
• ease of access to raw
materials through the supply
chain
• sophistication of routine
testing to identify
adulterants
• the nature of the raw
material.
The output from this assessment
shall be a documented
vulnerability assessment plan.
This plan shall be kept under
review to reflect changing
economic circumstances and
market intelligence which may
alter the potential risks. It shall
be formally reviewed annually.
5.4.3
Where raw materials are
identified as being at particular
risk of adulteration or
substitution, the vulnerability
assessment plan shall include
appropriate assurance and/or
testing processes to mitigate the
identified risks.

5.4.4
Where products are labelled or
claims are made on finished
packs which are dependent on
the status of a raw material, the
status of each batch of the raw
material shall be verified. These
claims include:
• specific provenance or
origin
• breed/varietal claims
• assured status (e.g.
GlobalG.A.P.)
• genetically modified
organism (GMO) status
• identity preserved
• named specific
trademarked
ingredients.
The facility shall maintain
purchasing records, traceability
of raw material usage and final
product packing records to
substantiate claims. The site
shall undertake documented
mass balance tests at a
frequency to meet the particular
scheme requirements or at least
every 6 months in the absence
of a scheme-specific
requirement.
5.4.5
Where claims are made about
the methods of production (e.g.
organic, halal, kosher) the site
shall maintain the necessary
certification status in order to
make such a claim.
5.4.6
The process flow for the
production of products where
claims are made shall be
documented and potential areas
for contamination or loss of

identity identified. Appropriate
controls shall be established to
ensure the integrity of the
product claims.
5.5 Utilities – water, ice, air and other gases
SOI
Product packaging shall be appropriate for the intended use and shall be stored under
conditions to prevent contamination and minimise deterioration.
5.5.1 When purchasing or specifying
primary packaging, the supplier
of packaging materials shall be
made aware of any particular
characteristics of the food (e.g.
high fat content, pH, usage
conditions such as microwaving,
other packaging used on the
product) which may affect
packaging suitability. Certificates
of conformity or other evidence
shall be available for primary
packaging to confirm it complies
with applicable food safety
legislation and is suitable for its
intended use.
5.5.2 Product liners and bags
purchased by the company for
use in direct contact with
ingredients, or work in process,
shall be appropriately coloured
(e.g. contrasting colour to the
product) and resistant to tearing
to prevent accidental
contamination.
procedure to manage obsolete
packaging (including labels). This
shall include:

• mechanisms to prevent
accidental use of
obsolete packaging
• control and disposal of
obsolete packaging
• appropriate procedures
for the disposal of
obsolete printed
materials (e.g. rendering
trademarked materials
unusable).
5.6 Product inspection and laboratory testing
SOI The company shall undertake or subcontract inspection and analyses which are critical to
confirm product safety, legality, integrity and quality, using appropriate procedures,
facilities and standards.
5.6.1 Product inspection and testing
5.6.1.1 There shall be a scheduled
programme of product testing
which may include
microbiological, chemical,
physical and organoleptic testing
according to risk. The methods,
frequency and specified limits
shall be documented.
5.6.1.2 Test and inspection results shall
be recorded and reviewed
regularly to identify trends. The
significance of external
laboratory results shall be
understood and acted upon
accordingly. Appropriate actions
shall be implemented promptly
to address any unsatisfactory
results or trends.
5.6.1.3 The site shall ensure that a
system of validation and ongoing
verification of the shelf life is in

place. This shall be based on risk
and shall include sensory
analysis and, as applicable,
microbiological testing and
relevant chemical factors such as
pH and aw. Records and results
from shelf-life tests shall verify
the shelf-life period indicated on
the product.
5.6.2 Laboratory testing
5.6.2.1 Pathogen testing (including
pathogens tested as part of the
environmental testing) shall be
subcontracted to an external
laboratory or, where conducted
internally, the laboratory facility
shall be fully segregated from
the production and storage
areas and have operating
procedures to prevent any risk
of product contamination.
5.6.2.2 Where routine testing
laboratories are present on a
manufacturing site, they shall be
located, designed and operated
to eliminate potential risks to
product safety. Controls shall be
documented, implemented and
include consideration of:
• design and operation of
drainage and ventilation
systems
• access and security of the
facility
• movement of laboratory
personnel
• protective clothing
arrangements

• processes for obtaining
product samples
• disposal of laboratory waste.
5.6.2.3 Where the company undertakes
or subcontracts analyses which
are critical to product safety or
legality, the laboratory or
subcontractors shall have gained
recognised laboratory
accreditation or operate in
accordance with the
requirements and principles of
ISO/IEC 17025. Documented
justification shall be available
where accredited methods are
not undertaken.
ensure reliability of laboratory
results, other than those critical
to safety and legality specified in
clause 5.6.2.3. These shall
include:
• use of recognised test
methods, where available
• documented testing
procedures
• ensuring staff are suitably
qualified and/or trained and
competent to carry out the
analysis required
• use of a system to verify the
accuracy of test results (e.g.
ring or proficiency testing)
• use of appropriately
calibrated and maintained
equipment.
5.6.2.5 The significance of laboratory
results shall be understood and
acted upon accordingly.

Appropriate action shall be
taken promptly to address any
unsatisfactory results or trends.
Where legal limits apply, these
shall be understood and
appropriate action taken
promptly to address any
exceedance of these limits.
5.7 Product release
SOI The site shall ensure that finished product is not released unless all agreed procedures
have been followed.
5.7.1 Where products require positive
release, procedures shall be in
place to ensure that release
does not occur until all release
criteria have been completed
and the release has been
authorised.
5.8 Pet food
SOI The site shall ensure that pet food products are safe and fit for intended use.
5.8.1 The site shall ensure pet food is
formulated/designed for the
intended use (e.g. where
products are designed for
complete diet or as a
complementary product).
5.8.2 Where a site’s product range
includes pet food products for
different animal species, the site
shall have specific procedures
for the management of any
ingredients, raw materials,
products or rework that could be

harmful to unintended
recipients.
5.8.3 Where the site manufactures,
processes or packs pet food
products that contain medicinal
substances, the site shall have
specific procedures for the
management of the medicated
raw materials and finished
products. At a minimum, these
procedures shall include:
• identification of medication-
containing materials handled
on site. These can be raw
materials, processing aids,
intermediate and finished
products, rework or any new
product or product
development ingredients
• mechanisms to ensure the
correct concentrations of
medicinal substances in
finished products
• procedures (e.g. cleaning
procedures) to prevent
contamination of non-
medicated pet food with
materials containing
medicinal substances
• specific procedures to
ensure the correct labelling
of medicated pet food.
6 Process control
6.1 Control of operations
Fundamental
SOI
The site shall operate to procedures and/or work instructions that ensure the production
of consistently safe and legal product with the desired quality characteristics, in full
compliance with the HACCP food safety plan.

6.1.1 Documented process
specifications and work
instructions/procedures shall be
available for the key processes
in the production of products to
ensure product safety, legality
and quality. The
specifications/procedures as
appropriate shall include:
• recipes – including
identification of any
allergens
• mixing instructions, speed,
time
• equipment process settings
• cooking times and
temperatures
• cooling times and
temperatures
• labelling instructions
• coding and shelf-life
marking
• any additional critical
control points identified in
the HACCP or food safety
plan.
Process specifications shall be
in accordance with the agreed
finished product specification.
6.1.2 Where equipment settings are
critical to the safety or legality
of the product, changes to the
equipment settings shall only
be completed by trained and
authorised staff. Where
applicable, controls shall be
password-protected or
otherwise restricted.

6.1.3 Process monitoring, such as of
temperature, time, pressure
and chemical properties, shall
be implemented, adequately
controlled and recorded to
ensure that product is produced
within the required process
specification.
6.1.4 In circumstances where process
parameters or product quality
are controlled by in-line
monitoring devices, these shall
be linked to a suitable failure
alert system that is routinely
tested.
6.1.5 Where variation in processing
conditions may occur within
equipment critical to the safety
or quality of products, the
processing characteristics shall
be validated and verified at a
frequency based on risk and
performance of equipment (e.g.
heat distribution in retorts,
ovens and processing vessels;
temperature distribution in
freezers and cold stores).
6.1.6 In the case of equipment failure
or deviation of the process from
specification, procedures shall
be in place to establish the
safety status and quality of the
product to determine the action
to be taken.
6.2 Labelling and pack control
Fundamental
SOI
The management controls of product labelling activities shall ensure that products will be
correctly labelled and coded.

6.2.1 There shall be a formal process
for the allocation of packaging
materials to packing lines and
control in the packing area
which ensures that only the
packaging for immediate use is
available to the packing
machines.
Where offline coding or printing
of packaging materials occurs:
• setting and
amendments to the
printer parameters (e.g.
the input of, or changes
to, date codes) shall
only be completed by
an authorised member
of staff
controls shall be in place to
ensure that only correctly
printed material is available at
the packing machines.
6.2.2 Documented checks of the
production line shall be carried
out before commencing
production and following
changes of product. These shall
ensure that lines have been
suitably cleared and are ready
for production. Documented
checks shall be carried out at
product changes to ensure that
all products and packaging from
the previous production have
been removed from the line
before changing to the next
production.
6.2.3 Procedures shall be in place to
ensure that all products are

packed into the correct
packaging and correctly
labelled. These shall include
checks:
• at the start of packing
• during the packing run
• when changing batches of
packaging materials
• at the end of each
production run.
The checks shall also include
verification of any printing
carried out at the packing stage
including, as appropriate:
• date coding
• batch coding
• quantity indication
• pricing information
• bar coding
• country of origin
• allergen information.
6.2.4 Where online verification
equipment (e.g. bar code
scanners) is used to check
product labels and printing, the
site shall establish and
implement procedures for the
operation and testing of the
equipment to ensure that the
system is correctly set up and
capable of alerting or rejecting
product when packaging
information is out of
specification.
At a minimum, testing of the
equipment shall be completed
at:
• the start of the packing run
• the end of the packing run

• a frequency based on the
site’s ability to identify,
hold and prevent the
release of any implicated
materials should the
equipment fail (e.g. during
the packing run or when
changing batches of
packaging materials).
The site shall establish and
implement procedures in the
event of a failure in the online
verification equipment (e.g. a
documented and trained
manual checking procedure).
6.3 Quantity – weight, volume and number control
SOI The site shall operate a quantity control system which conforms to legal requirements in
the country where the product is sold and any additional industry sector codes or specified
customer requirements.
6.3.1 The frequency and
methodology of quantity
checking shall meet the
requirements of the
appropriate legislation
governing quantity verification,
and records of checks shall be
retained.
6.3.2 Where the quantity of the
product is not governed by
legislative requirements (e.g.
bulk quantity), the product
must conform to customer
requirements and records shall
be maintained.
6.3.3 Where used, the site shall
establish procedures for the
operation and testing of online

check weighers. At a minimum,
this shall include:
• consideration of any legal
requirements
• responsibilities for testing
the equipment
• operating effectiveness and
any variations for particular
products
• methods and frequency of
testing the check weighers
• records of the test results.
6.4 Calibration and control of measuring and monitoring devices
SOI The site shall be able to demonstrate that measuring equipment is sufficiently accurate
and reliable to provide confidence in measurement results.
6.4.1 The site shall identify and
control measuring equipment
used to monitor critical control
points and product safety,
legality and quality. This shall
• a documented list of
equipment and its location
• an identification code and
calibration due date
• prevention from
adjustment by
unauthorised staff
• protection from damage,
deterioration or misuse.
6.4.2 All identified measuring
devices, including new
equipment, shall be checked
and, where necessary, adjusted:
• at a predetermined
frequency, based on risk
assessment

• to a defined method
traceable to a recognised
national or international
standard where possible.
Results shall be documented.
Equipment shall be readable
and be of a suitable accuracy
for the measurements it is
required to perform.
6.4.3 Reference measuring
equipment shall be calibrated
and traceable to a recognised
national or international
standard and records
maintained. The uncertainty of
calibration shall be considered
when equipment is used to
assess critical limits.
6.4.4 Procedures shall be in place to
record actions to be taken
when the prescribed measuring
devices are found not to be
operating within specified
limits. Where the safety or
legality of products is based on
equipment found to be
inaccurate, action shall be taken
to ensure at-risk product is not
offered for sale.
7 Personnel
7.1 Training: raw material handling, preparation, processing, packing and storage areas
Fundamental
SOI
The company shall ensure that all personnel performing work that affects product safety,
legality and quality are demonstrably competent to carry out their activity, through
training, work experience or qualification.

7.1.1 All relevant personnel,
including agency-supplied staff,
temporary staff and
contractors, shall be
appropriately trained prior to
commencing work and
adequately supervised
throughout the working period.
7.1.2 Where personnel are engaged
in activities relating to critical
control points, relevant training
and competency assessment
shall be in place.
7.1.3 The site shall put in place
documented programmes
covering the training needs of
relevant personnel. These shall
• identifying the necessary
competencies for specific
roles
• providing training or other
action to ensure staff have
the necessary
competencies
• reviewing the effectiveness
of training
• delivery of training in the
appropriate language of
trainees.
7.1.4 All relevant personnel,
including engineers, agency-
supplied staff, temporary staff
and contractors, shall have
received general allergen
awareness training and be
trained in the site’s allergen-
handling procedures.
7.1.5 All relevant personnel
(including relevant agency-

supplied staff, temporary staff
and contractors) shall have
received training on the site’s
labelling and packing processes
which are designed to ensure
the correct labelling and
packing of products.
7.1.6 Records of all training shall be
available. These shall include,
at a minimum:
• the name of the trainee
and confirmation of
attendance
• the date and duration of
the training
• the title or course contents,
as appropriate
• the training provider
• for internal courses, a
reference to the material,
work instruction or
procedure that is used in
the training.
Where training is undertaken
by agencies on behalf of the
company, records of the
training shall be available.
7.1.7 The company shall routinely
review the competencies of its
staff. As appropriate, it shall
provide relevant training. This
may be in the form of training,
refresher training, coaching,
mentoring or on-the-job
experience.
7.2 Personal hygiene: raw material handling, preparation, processing, packing and storage
areas
SOI
The site’s personal hygiene standards shall
be developed to minimise the risk of product

contamination from personnel, be
appropriate to the products produced and
be adopted by all personnel, including
agency-supplied staff, contractors and
visitors to the production facility.
7.2.1
The requirements for personal
hygiene shall be documented
and communicated to all
personnel. These shall include,
at a minimum, the following:
• watches shall not be
worn
• jewellery shall not be
worn, with the
exception of a plain
wedding ring, wedding
wristband or medical
alert jewellery
• rings and studs in
exposed parts of the
body, such as ears,
noses and eyebrows,
shall not be worn
• fingernails shall be kept
short, clean and
unvarnished
• false fingernails and
nail art shall not be
permitted
• excessive perfume or
aftershave shall not be
worn.
Compliance with the
requirements shall be checked
routinely.
7.2.2
Hand-washing shall be
performed on entry to the
production areas and at a
frequency that is appropriate

to minimise the risk of product
contamination.
7.2.3
All cuts and grazes on exposed
skin shall be covered by an
appropriately coloured plaster
that is different from the
product colour (preferably
blue) and contains a metal
detectable strip. These shall be
site-issued and monitored.
Where appropriate, in addition
to the plaster, a glove shall be
worn.
7.2.4
Where metal detection
equipment is used, a sample
from each batch of plasters
shall be successfully tested
through the equipment and
records shall be kept.
7.2.5
Processes and written
instructions for staff shall be in
place to control the use and
storage of personal medicines,
so as to minimise the risk of
7.3 Medical screening
SOI
The company shall have procedures in place to ensure that employees, agency staff,
contractors or visitors are not a source of transmission of food-borne diseases to products.
7.3.1 The site shall make employees
aware of the symptoms of
infection, disease or condition
which would prevent a person
working with open food. The
site shall have a procedure
which enables notification by
employees, including
temporary employees, of any

relevant symptoms, infection,
disease or condition with which
they may have been in contact
or be suffering from.
7.3.2 Where there may be a risk to
product safety, visitors and
contractors shall be made
aware of the types of
symptoms, infection, disease or
condition which would prevent
a person visiting areas with
open food. Where permitted by
law, visitors shall be required to
complete a health
questionnaire or otherwise
confirm that they are not
suffering from any symptoms
which may put product safety
at risk, prior to entering the
raw material, preparation,
processing, packing and storage
areas.
7.3.3 There shall be procedures for
employees, contractors and
visitors relating to action to be
taken where they may be
suffering from or have been in
contact with an infectious
disease. Expert medical advice
shall be sought where required.
7.4 Protective clothing: employees or visitors to production areas
SOI
Suitable site-issued protective clothing shall be worn by employees, contractors or visitors
working in or entering production areas.
7.4.1
The company shall document
and communicate to all
employees (including agency
and temporary personnel),
contractors or visitors the rules

regarding the wearing of
protective clothing in specified
work areas (e.g. production
areas, storage areas etc.). This
shall also include policies
relating to the wearing of
protective clothing away from
the production environment
(e.g. removal before entering
toilets, and use of canteen and
smoking areas).
7.4.2 Protective clothing shall be
available that:
• is provided in sufficient
numbers for each
employee
• is of suitable design to
prevent contamination of
the product (at a minimum
containing no external
pockets above the waist or
sewn-on buttons)
• fully contains all scalp hair
to prevent product
contamination
• includes snoods for beards
and moustaches, where
required, to prevent
7.4.3 Laundering of protective
clothing shall take place by an
approved contracted or in-
house laundry using defined
criteria to validate the
effectiveness of the laundering
process. The laundry must
operate procedures which
ensure:
• adequate segregation
between dirty and cleaned
clothes

• effective cleaning of the
protective clothing
• cleaned clothes are
supplied protected from
contamination until use
(e.g. by the use of covers or
bags).
Washing of protective clothing
by the employee is exceptional
but shall be acceptable where
the protective clothing is to
protect the employee from the
products handled and the
clothing is worn in enclosed
product or low-risk areas only.
7.4.4 Protective clothing shall be
changed at an appropriate
frequency, based on risk.
7.4.5 If gloves are used, they shall be
replaced regularly. Where
appropriate, gloves shall be
suitable for food use, of a
disposable type, of a distinctive
colour (blue where possible),
be intact and not shed loose
fibres.
7.4.6 Where items of personal
protective clothing that are not
suitable for laundering are
provided (such as chain mail,
gloves and aprons), these shall
be cleaned and sanitised at a
frequency based on risk.
8 High-risk, high-care and ambient high-care production risk zones
SOI
Where a site produces products that require handling in high-risk, high-care and/or
ambient high-care production facilities (see Appendix 2 for the definition of products that

require these facilities), all the relevant requirements from sections 1–7 of the Standard
must be fulfilled in addition to the requirements in this section.
8.1
Layout, product flow and segregation in high-risk, high-care and ambient high-care zones
SOI
The site shall be able to demonstrate that production facilities and controls are suitable to
prevent pathogen contamination of products.
8.1.1
The map of the site (see
clause 4.3.1) shall include
areas (zones) where the
product is at different levels
of risk from contamination.
The map shall show:
• high-risk areas
• high-care areas
• ambient high-care areas
• low-risk areas
• enclosed product areas
• non-product areas.
See Appendix 2 for guidelines
on defining the production
risk zones.
This zoning shall be taken into
account when determining
the prerequisite programmes
for the particular areas of the
site.
8.1.2 Where high-risk areas are part
of the manufacturing site,
there shall be physical
segregation between these
areas and other parts of the
site. Segregation shall take
into account the flow of
product, the nature of the
packaging), the equipment,
the personnel, the disposal of

waste, the flow of air, the air
quality, and the provision of
utilities (including drains). The
location of transfer points
shall not compromise the
segregation between high-risk
areas and other areas of the
factory. Practices shall be in
place to minimise the risk of
product contamination (e.g.
the disinfection of materials
on entry).
8.1.3 Where high-care areas are
part of the manufacturing
site, there should be physical
segregation between these
areas and other parts of the
site. Segregation shall take
into account the flow of
product, the nature of
packaging), the equipment,
the personnel, the disposal of
waste, the flow of air, the air
quality, and the provision of
utilities (including drains).
Where physical barriers are
not in place, the site shall
have undertaken a
of the potential for cross-
contamination, and effective,
validated processes shall be in
place to protect products
from contamination.
8.1.4 Where ambient high-care
areas are required, a
shall be completed to
determine the risk of cross-
contamination with
pathogens. The risk

assessment shall take into
account the potential sources
of microbiological
contamination and include:
• the raw materials and
products
• the flow of raw
materials, packaging,
products, equipment,
personnel and waste
• air flow and quality
• the provision and
location of utilities
(including drains).
Effective processes shall be in
place to protect the final
product from microbiological
contamination. These
processes may include
segregation, management of
process flow or other
controls.
8.2 Building fabric in high-risk and high-care zones
8.2.1
Where sites include high-risk
or high-care facilities, there
shall be a map of the drains
for these areas which shows
the direction of flow and the
location of any equipment
fitted to prevent the back-up
of waste water. The flow from
drains shall not present a risk
of contamination to the high-
risk/care area.
8.2.2
High-risk areas shall be
supplied with sufficient
changes of filtered air. The
filter specification used and

frequency of air changes shall
be documented, based on a
risk assessment that takes
into account the source of the
air and the requirement to
maintain a positive air
pressure relative to the
surrounding areas.
8.3 Maintenance in high-risk and high-care zones
8.3.1 Maintenance activities
undertaken in high-risk and
high-care areas shall respect
the segregation requirements
of the area. Wherever
possible, tools and equipment
shall be dedicated for use in
that area and retained in the
same.
8.3.2 Where equipment is removed
from the high-risk or high-care
area, the site shall have a
procedure to ensure the
cleanliness and removal of
contamination hazards before
being accepted back into the
area.
Records of acceptance back
into the area shall be
maintained.
8.3.3 Where portable equipment
(e.g. handheld devices) is used
in high-risk or high-care areas,
these items shall either be:
• visually distinctive and
dedicated for use in that
area

or
• have specific procedures
(e.g. a full clean) to ensure
that their use does not
result in contamination.
8.4 Staff facilities for high-risk and high-care zones
8.4.1 Where an operation includes
a high-risk or high-care area,
personnel shall enter via a
specially designated changing
facility at the entrance to the
area. The changing facilities
shall incorporate the
following:
• clear instructions for
the order of changing
into and out of
dedicated protective
clothes to prevent the
contamination of
clean clothing
• protective clothing
that is visually distinct
from that worn in
other areas and which
shall not be worn
outside the area
• a hand-washing
routine during the
changing procedure
to prevent
contamination of the
clean clothing (i.e.
hand-washing after
hair covering and
footwear have been
put on, but before
handling clean
protective clothing)

• provision and use of
hand-washing and
disinfection facilities.
At a minimum these
shall be:
− prior to entry
for high-risk
areas
− on entry for
high-care
areas
• dedicated site
footwear that is
provided by the site
and which shall not be
worn outside the
factory
• an effective control of
footwear to prevent
the introduction of
pathogens into the
area. Control may be
by segregation and a
controlled change of
footwear before
entering the area
(such as a barrier or
bench system) or by
the use of controlled
and managed boot-
wash facilities where
these demonstrably
provide an effective
control of footwear to
prevent the
introduction of
pathogens into the
area.
A programme of
environmental monitoring
shall be used to assess the

effectiveness of footwear
controls.
8.5 Housekeeping and hygiene in high-risk and high-care zones
8.5.1 Environmental cleaning
procedures in high-care/high-
risk areas shall, at a minimum,
include:
• responsibility for cleaning
• item/area to be cleaned
• frequency of cleaning
• method of cleaning,
including dismantling
equipment for cleaning
purposes where required
• cleaning chemicals and
concentrations
• cleaning materials to be
used
• cleaning records and
responsibility for
verification.
The frequency and methods
of cleaning shall be based on
risk, and the procedures shall
be implemented to ensure
that appropriate standards of
cleaning are achieved.
8.5.2 Microbiological limits for
acceptable and unacceptable
cleaning performance shall be
defined for high-risk/high-care
production risk zones.
These limits shall be based on
the potential hazards relevant
to the product or processing
area. Therefore, acceptable
levels of cleaning may be

defined by visual appearance,
ATP bioluminescence
techniques (see glossary),
microbiological testing,
allergen testing or chemical
testing as appropriate. The
site shall define the corrective
action to be taken when
monitored results are outside
of the acceptable limits.
Where cleaning procedures
are part of a defined
prerequisite plan to control
the risk of a specific hazard,
the cleaning and disinfection
procedures and frequencies
shall be validated and records
maintained. This shall include
the risk from cleaning
chemical residues on food
contact surfaces.
8.5.3 Equipment used for cleaning
in high-care and high-risk
areas shall be visually
distinctive and dedicated for
use in that area.
8.6 Waste/waste disposal in high-risk, high-care zones
8.6.1 Waste disposal systems shall
ensure that the risk of
contamination of products is
minimised through the control
of potential cross-
contamination.
Risk assessment shall consider
the movement and flow of
waste and waste containers.
For example, waste bins
should be dedicated to either

high-risk or high-care areas
and not be moved between
different production risk
zones.
8.7 Protective clothing in high-risk and high-care zones
8.7.1 Laundering of protective
clothing for high-risk and high-
care areas shall be by an
approved contracted or in-
house laundry using defined
criteria to validate the
effectiveness of the
laundering process. The
laundry must operate
procedures which ensure:
between dirty and
cleaned clothes
between clothes for high-
risk, high-care and low-
risk areas etc.
• effective cleaning of the
protective clothing
• commercial sterilisation of
the protective clothing
following the washing and
drying process
• protection of the cleaned
clothes from
contamination until use
(e.g. by the use of covers
or bags).
8.7.2 Where protective clothing for
high-care or high-risk areas is
cleaned by a contracted or in-
house laundry, the laundry
shall be audited either directly
or by a third party. The

frequency of these audits shall
be based on risk.
8.7.3 Protective clothing for use in
high-risk and high-care areas
shall be changed at an
appropriate frequency based
on risk, and at a minimum
daily.
9 Requirements for traded products
SOI Where a site purchases and sells food products that would normally fall within the scope of
the Standard and are stored at the site’s facilities, but which are not manufactured, further
processed or packed at the site being audited, the site’s management of these products is
covered by the requirements in this section.
All the relevant requirements from sections 1 to 8 must also be fulfilled in addition to the
requirements outlined in this section.
9.1 Approval and performance monitoring of manufacturers/packers of traded food products
SOI The company shall operate procedures for approval of the last manufacturer or packer of
food products which are traded to ensure that traded food products are safe, legal and
manufactured in accordance with any defined product specifications.
documented supplier approval
procedure which identifies the
process for initial and ongoing
approval of suppliers and the
manufacturer/processor of
each product traded. The
requirements shall be based
on the results of a risk
assessment which shall
include consideration of:
• the nature of the product
and associated risks

• customer-specific
requirements
• legislative requirements in
the country of sale or
importation of the
product
• source or country of origin
• potential for adulteration
or fraud
• potential risks in the
supply chain to the point
of receipt of the goods by
the company
• the brand identity of
products (i.e. customer
own brand or branded
product).
procedure for the initial and
ongoing approval of
manufacturers of products.
This approval procedure shall
be based on risk and include
either one or a combination
of:
applicable BRC Global
Standard or GFSI-
benchmarked standard.
The scope of the
certification shall include
the products purchased
• supplier audits, with a
scope to include product
safety, traceability, HACCP
review and good
manufacturing practices,
undertaken by an
experienced and
demonstrably competent
product safety auditor.
Where this supplier audit
is completed by a second

or third party, the
− demonstrate
the
competency
of the auditor
− confirm that
the scope of
the audit
includes
product
safety,
traceability,
HACCP review
and good
manufacturing
practices
− obtain and
review a copy
of the full
audit report
or
• where a valid risk-based
justification is provided
and the supplier is
assessed as low risk only,
a completed supplier
questionnaire may be
used for initial approval.
The questionnaire shall
have a scope that includes
product safety,
traceability, HACCP review
and good manufacturing
practices, and it shall have
been reviewed and
verified by a demonstrably
competent person.
9.1.3 Records shall be maintained of
the manufacturer’s/packer’s
approval process, including
audit reports or verified

certificates confirming the
product safety status of the
manufacturing/packing sites
supplying the products traded.
There shall be a process of
review and records of follow-
up of any issues identified at
the manufacturing/packing
sites with the potential to
affect food products traded by
the company.
9.1.4 There shall be a process for
the ongoing review of
manufacturers/packers, based
on risk and using defined
performance criteria, which
may include complaints,
results of any product tests,
regulatory warnings/alerts,
customer rejections or
feedback. The process shall be
fully implemented.
Where approval is based on
questionnaires, these shall be
reissued at least every 3 years
and suppliers shall be required
to notify the site of any
significant changes in the
interim, including any change
in certification status.
Records of the review shall be
kept.
9.2 Specifications
SOI Specifications or information to meet legal requirements and assist customers in the safe
usage of the product shall be maintained and available to customers.
9.2.1 Specifications shall be
available for all products.

These shall either be in the
agreed format as supplied by
the customer or, where this is
not specified, include key data
to meet legal requirements
and assist the customer in the
safe usage of the product.
Specifications may be in the
form of a printed or electronic
document, or part of an online
specification system.
9.2.2 The company shall seek formal
agreement of the
specifications with relevant
parties. Where specifications
are not formally agreed, the
company shall be able to
demonstrate that it has taken
steps to ensure formal
agreement is in place.
9.2.3 Companies shall operate
demonstrable processes to
ensure that any customer-
specified requirements are
met. This may be by inclusion
of customer requirements
within buying specifications or
by undertaking further work
on the purchased product to
meet the customer’s
specification (e.g. sorting or
grading of product).
9.2.4 Specification review shall be
sufficiently frequent to ensure
that data is current or at a
minimum every 3 years, taking
into account product changes,
suppliers, regulations and
other risks.

Reviews and changes shall be
documented.
9.3 Product inspection and laboratory testing
SOI The site shall operate processes to ensure that the products received comply with buying
specifications and that the supplied product is in accordance with any customer
specification.
9.3.1 The site shall have a product
sampling or assurance
programme to verify that the
products are in accordance
with buying specifications and
meet legal and safety
requirements.
Where verification is based on
sampling, the sample rate and
assessment process shall be
risk-based.
Records of the results of
assessments or analysis shall
be maintained.
9.3.2 Where verification of
conformity is provided by the
supplier (e.g. certificates of
conformity or analysis), the
level of confidence in the
information provided shall be
supported by commissioning
periodic independent product
analysis.
9.3.3 Where claims are made about
the products being handled,
including the provenance,
chain of custody and assured
or ‘identity preserved’ status
of a product or raw materials
used, supporting information

shall be available from the
supplier or independently to
verify the claim.
9.3.4 Where the company
undertakes or subcontracts
analyses which are critical to
product safety or legality, the
laboratory or subcontractors
shall have gained recognised
laboratory accreditation or
operate in accordance with
the requirements and
principles of ISO 17025.
Documented justification shall
be available where non-
accredited test methods are
used.
9.3.5 Test and inspection results
shall be retained and reviewed
to identify trends. Appropriate
actions shall be implemented
promptly to address any
unsatisfactory results or
trends.
9.4 Product legality
SOI The company shall have processes in place to ensure that the food products traded comply
with the legal requirements in the country of sale where known.
9.4.1 The company shall have
documented processes to
verify the legality of products
which are traded. These
processes shall include as
appropriate:
• labelling information
• compliance with
relevant legal

compositional
requirements
• compliance with
quantity or volume
requirements.
Where such
responsibilities are
undertaken by the
customer, this shall be
clearly stated in
contracts.
9.5 Traceability
SOI The company shall be able to trace all product lots back to the last manufacturer and
forward to the customer of the company.
9.5.1 The site shall maintain a
traceability system for all
batches of product which
identify the last manufacturer
or, in the case of primary
agricultural products, the
packer or place of last
significant change to the
product. Records shall also be
maintained to identify the
recipient of each batch of
product from the company.
9.5.2 The company shall test the
traceability system at least
annually to ensure that
traceability can be determined
back to the last manufacturer
and forward to the recipient
of the product from the
company. This shall include
identification of the
movement of the product
through the chain from the
manufacturer to receipt by the
company (e.g. each movement

and intermediate place of
storage).
9.5.3 The traceability test shall
include the reconciliation of
quantities of product received
by the company for the
chosen batch or product lot.
Traceability should be
achievable within 4 hours (1
day when information is
required from external
parties).

Brc auditor check list

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Brc auditor check list (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Brc auditor check list