![International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108
______________________________________________________________________________________
106
IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Broadcasting Scenario under Different Protocols in MANET: A Survey
Chakradhar Verma
Research Scholar UCE,RTU,Kota(Raj.)
chakradharverma@gmail.com
Manish Jain
ITM,Bhilwara,(Raj.)
dch.mani@yahoo.co.in
Abstract— A wireless network enables people to communicate and access applications and information without wires. This provides freedom
of movement and the ability to extend applications to different parts of a building, city, or nearly anywhere in the world. Wireless networks
allow people to interact with e-mail or browse the Internet from a location that they prefer. Adhoc Networks are self-organizing wireless
networks, absent any fixed infrastructure. broadcasting of data through proper channel is essential. Various protocols are designed to avoid
the loss of data. In this paper an overview of different broadcast protocols are discussed.
Keywords- MANET,Broadcasting,Protocols,Techniques
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
Mobile Ad-hoc Network: MANET is a combination of sensor
node that can proceed on their own and connect with the
physical environment. Mobile nodes have the ability of
computing, sensing and communication like static nodes.
Manet is one such network and it is a continuously self-
configuring, infrastructure-less network of mobile devices
connected wires.
Each device in a MANET is free to move independently in any
direction, and will therefore change its links to other devices
frequently. Each must forward traffic unrelated to its own use,
and therefore be a router. The primary challenge in building a
MANET is equipping each device to continuously maintain
the information required to properly route traffic.
The routing protocols for MANET are divided into three major
classifications like reactive protocols, Proactive protocols and
hybrid.
In reactive protocols, paths are determined when they are
required by the source using a route discovery process.
AODV,DSR , ROAM , LMR, SSA , LAR , RDMAR , ARA ,
FORP , CBRP are the examples of reactive routing
protocols[5].
In proactive routing protocols [5] the paths to all the
destination nodes are determined at the start up, and
maintained by using a periodic route update process. DSDV,
GSR, FSR, STAR, DREAM is the examples for the proactive
routing protocols.
Hybrid routing protocols are both reactive and proactive in
nature. Each protocol has unique characteristics and
examples are ZRP, ZHLS, SLURP, and DDR.
In this paper, different techniques used for broadcasting
data in MANET will be discussed.
II. BROADCATING TECHNIQUES
This section defines the different broadcasting
techniques employed in mobile adhoc networks and their
issues during data routing from source to destination.
a) A simple improved distributed algorithm for minimum
CDS in unit disk graphs.
Stefan,Alexander,Ulrich and Segal proposed a routing
scheme in adhoc networks in such a way to construct a
backbone based on minimum connected dominating set. This
approach presents a very simple distributed algorithm for
computing a small CDS. Backbone nodes in networks can
perform efficient routing and broadcasting information. This
approach assumes that time slots assignment to the nodes
exists such that no two nodes transmit in the same time slot[4].
Coloring algorithm is used to determine such assignment.
The execution of this algorithm is divided into rounds
and each round consists of three phases. In each phase a
conflict–free time slot assignment is used and hence each node
is able to transmit once.
This technique has a direct impact on the size of several
CDS constructions and the relationship between the size of
maximal independent set and a minimum CDS in unit disk
graph is analyzed which yields better rounds for many other
algorithms[4].
b) Stochastic Flooding Broadcast Protocols in
Mobile Wireless Networks
Julien Cartigny, David Simplot and Jean Carle have proposed
a paper “Stochastic Flooding Broadcast Protocols in
Mobile Wireless Networks”. The information broadcast based
on the flooding protocol in wireless communication
environment leads to an overload of network bandwidth.
So, each node has to obtain medium access and transmit its](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/22153328576403-08-2018-190131154253/85/Broadcasting-Scenario-under-Different-Protocols-in-MANET-A-Survey-1-320.jpg)
![International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108
______________________________________________________________________________________
107
IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
data. However, in dense network the collision probability is
very high. In this paper, some improvements of the stochastic
flooding protocols were proposed that aim to broadcast given
information through the entire network efficiently [2]. The
stochastic flooding protocols and its variants works based on
five modes of stochastic approaches.
The main contributions of this paper are based on stochastic
approach, topology adaptability, internal-node- based
broadcasting algorithms and neighbor elimination scheme. The
mode of flooding protocols may decrease the number of
emitted packets and stochastic can offer good variety to
generate multiple routes. Probabilistic Scheme gives also
better use of energy and offers a better average use of the
battery.
c) Color-Based Broadcasting for Ad Hoc Networks
Alireza Keshavarz-Haddad, Vinay Ribeiroz and Rudolf Riedi
have proposed a paper “Color-Based Broadcasting for Ad
Hoc Networks”. This paper presents a color-based
broadcast technique for wireless ad hoc networks where for
each forwarding of the broadcast message a unique color is
assigned from different set of colors. The message is
forwarded by the node only if a color is assigned from color
set which it has not already overheard after a random time. In
the closely related counter-based broadcast scheme the number
of broadcasts is counted by a node but the colors overheard
are not counted. The forwarding nodes form a backbone,
which is determined by the random timers[3]. The color-
generated backbone nodes exhibit a connectivity graph richer
than the counter-based ones. The different color shows
geometric properties of the backbones which proves that the
sizes of both color- and counter-generated backbones
are within a small constant factor of the optimum. Two
techniques, boosting and edge-growing, are proposed that
improve the performance of color and counter based broadcast
in terms of reachability and number of rebroadcasts.
d) SLAW: A Mobility Model for Human Walks
Kyunghan Lee (KAIST), Seongik Hong (NCSU), Seong
Joon Kim (NCSU), Injong Rhee (NCSU) and Song Chong
(KAIST) have proposed a paper, “SLAW: A Mobility
Model for Human Walks”. In mobile networks, the
movement patterns of mobile holders decide the
performance of networking applications. The humans have
control of mobility and such mobile networks are
simulated by their mobility patterns. Simulation tools are used
to deploy real mobile networks and can be used for
performance evaluation. This paper presents a new mobility
model, called Self similar Least- Action Walk (SLAW), which
produces synthetic mobility traces. SLAW acts as an important
tool for matching human walk behaviors and it can be applied
in traffic predications and biological virus spread evaluation
where human mobility traces are important. SLAW needs only
a few input parameters such as the walk-about area size, the
number of walkers, and the Hurst value used for fractal
waypoints generation. SLAW development relies on GPS
traces of human walks including 226 daily traces collected
from 101 volunteers in five different outdoor sites [6].
Many traces are gathered among people those who share the
common interests like students in the same university and
tourists spot. SLAW expresses the regular and spontaneous
trip patterns available in the daily movement of humans.
People may visit same places but may at the same time, make
irregular trips. The order of visiting places may be random.
The main work of this paper is to express and analyze the
regularity and spontaneity by emulating a human mobility
model. The study shows that SLAW identifies the unique
features of various DTN routing protocols compared to
random mobility techniques. Also it gives a clear
performance analysis about protocols those may and may not
utilize past contact history information among nodes to predict
the future contact probability information.
e) Flash Flooding: Exploring the capture effect for
Rapid flooding in Wireless Sensor Networks
Jiakang Lu and Kamin Whitehouse proposed flash flooding
protocol for rapid network flooding in wireless sensor
networks. The Flash flooding protocol allows concurrent
transmissions among neighboring nodes[5]. It relied on the
capture effect to ensure that each node receives the flood
from at least one of its neighbors.
This flash flooding approach is divided into three parts: Flash-
I illustrates complete concurrency such that the nodes
repeat the message as soon as they receive it, even if their
neighbors are still transmitting. Flash-II illustrates Maintained
Concurrency such that nodes use MAC delay to wait for all
neighbors to finish transmitting. Flash-III illustrates
Controlled Concurrency which improves flooding
throughput in low-duty cycle networks. This protocol
approached the theoretical lower bound on flooding latency
and does not compromise reliability or power consumption.
f) Gossip-Based Ad Hoc Routing
Zygmunt Haas Joseph Y. Halpern Li Li
designed a gossip based approach to reduce the overhead
problem. Gossip protocol acts as a communication protocol
which is used to overcome the unreliable communication, data
redundancy, unbounded information and overhead problem.
The basic idea of the gossip protocol is that few nodes may
receive the message frequently and others don’t receive the
message since gossip message dies out quickly during the
data network transmission. They skipped this problem by
setting a gossiping probability between 0.6 and 0.8 during
every execution in dense network. Gossiping when combined
with flooding technique yields good results which shows that
35% of message overhead is reduced in terms of throughput](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/22153328576403-08-2018-190131154253/85/Broadcasting-Scenario-under-Different-Protocols-in-MANET-A-Survey-2-320.jpg)
![International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108
______________________________________________________________________________________
108
IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
and latency [1].The probability rate is increases if it is success
and decreases to 0 if it is a failure and they come to an
conclusion that each intermediate node receiving the packet
will gossip with the probability carried in the route
request packet. Gossiping is still being useful even when
global messages aresent.
III.PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
From all the above mentioned paper the performance
metrics analyzed are Latency, HOP count, Network
Reachability or Network size and number of retransmissions.
The analyzed metrics are consolidated in the Table.1 below:
Table 1: Performance Metrics
PROTOCOL S
PERFORMANCE METRICS
Latency HOP Count
Size/Rea
chability
Rebroadcast
UDG
<11.4ms 22 3.5 -
SFB .6 30 - 0.7
CBB 3ms 50 95% <2
SLAW 0.7m 40 - -
Flas
h
10.8 sec 20 -10db 6
Gossip-
Based
20ms 150 30-40% 5
IV. CONCLUSION
Broadcasting is one of the primary issues in the entire
wireless network and transmission of data through proper
channel without any loss of data is a very difficult task. In this
paper a review of broadcasting Protocol was made and their
effects on the network are discussed. From all the above
mentioned paper decided that it is possible to reduce the
rebroadcasting, latency time of data by using any one of the
protocol. It is seen that the observations are found to be good
on different broadcasting schemes.
REFERENCES
[1] K. Lee, S. Hong, S. J. Kim, I. Rhee, and S. Chong, “SLAW:
A new mobility model for human walks,” in Proc. IEEE
Conf. Comput. Commun., 2009, pp. 855–863.
[2] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals
of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel
functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp.
529–551, April 1955. (references)
[3] J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism,
3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.
[4] I. S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and
exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and
H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.
[5] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.
[6] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J.
Name Stand. Abbrev., in press.
[7] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron
spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic
substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp.
740–741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics
Japan, p. 301, 1982].
[8] M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley,
CA: University Science, 1989.
[9] Electronic Publication: Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs):
Article in a journal:
[10] D. Kornack and P. Rakic, “Cell Proliferation without
Neurogenesis in Adult Primate Neocortex,” Science, vol. 294,
Dec. 2001, pp. 2127-2130, doi:10.1126/science.1065467.
Article in a conference proceedings:
[11] H. Goto, Y. Hasegawa, and M. Tanaka, “Efficient Scheduling
Focusing on the Duality of MPL Representatives,” Proc.
IEEE Symp. Computational Intelligence in Scheduling (SCIS
07), IEEE Press, Dec. 2007, pp. 57-64,
doi:10.1109/SCIS.2007.357670.
[12] M. Ramkumar, N. Memon, KPI: A Security Infrastructure for
Trusted Devices, Pre-Conference.
[13] J. Cartigny, D. Simplot, and J. Carle, “Stochastic flooding
broadcast protocols in mobile wireless networks,” LIFL,
Univ. Lille1,Lille, France, Tech. Rep.,2003.
[14] J. Lu and K. Whitehouse, “Flash flooding: Exploiting the
capture effect for rapid flooding in wireless sensor networks,”
in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., 2009, pp. 2491–
2499.
[15] Zhou, L. and Haas, Z. J., “Securing ad hoc networks”, IEEE
Network, Volume 13, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 1999, pp. 24 – 30](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/22153328576403-08-2018-190131154253/85/Broadcasting-Scenario-under-Different-Protocols-in-MANET-A-Survey-3-320.jpg)
Ad
More Related Content
What's hot (17)
Similar to Broadcasting Scenario under Different Protocols in MANET: A Survey (20)
Ad
More from rahulmonikasharma (20)
Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
Broadcasting Scenario under Different Protocols in MANET: A Survey
- 1. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 106 IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org _______________________________________________________________________________________ Broadcasting Scenario under Different Protocols in MANET: A Survey Chakradhar Verma Research Scholar UCE,RTU,Kota(Raj.) [email protected] Manish Jain ITM,Bhilwara,(Raj.) [email protected] Abstract— A wireless network enables people to communicate and access applications and information without wires. This provides freedom of movement and the ability to extend applications to different parts of a building, city, or nearly anywhere in the world. Wireless networks allow people to interact with e-mail or browse the Internet from a location that they prefer. Adhoc Networks are self-organizing wireless networks, absent any fixed infrastructure. broadcasting of data through proper channel is essential. Various protocols are designed to avoid the loss of data. In this paper an overview of different broadcast protocols are discussed. Keywords- MANET,Broadcasting,Protocols,Techniques __________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION Mobile Ad-hoc Network: MANET is a combination of sensor node that can proceed on their own and connect with the physical environment. Mobile nodes have the ability of computing, sensing and communication like static nodes. Manet is one such network and it is a continuously self- configuring, infrastructure-less network of mobile devices connected wires. Each device in a MANET is free to move independently in any direction, and will therefore change its links to other devices frequently. Each must forward traffic unrelated to its own use, and therefore be a router. The primary challenge in building a MANET is equipping each device to continuously maintain the information required to properly route traffic. The routing protocols for MANET are divided into three major classifications like reactive protocols, Proactive protocols and hybrid. In reactive protocols, paths are determined when they are required by the source using a route discovery process. AODV,DSR , ROAM , LMR, SSA , LAR , RDMAR , ARA , FORP , CBRP are the examples of reactive routing protocols[5]. In proactive routing protocols [5] the paths to all the destination nodes are determined at the start up, and maintained by using a periodic route update process. DSDV, GSR, FSR, STAR, DREAM is the examples for the proactive routing protocols. Hybrid routing protocols are both reactive and proactive in nature. Each protocol has unique characteristics and examples are ZRP, ZHLS, SLURP, and DDR. In this paper, different techniques used for broadcasting data in MANET will be discussed. II. BROADCATING TECHNIQUES This section defines the different broadcasting techniques employed in mobile adhoc networks and their issues during data routing from source to destination. a) A simple improved distributed algorithm for minimum CDS in unit disk graphs. Stefan,Alexander,Ulrich and Segal proposed a routing scheme in adhoc networks in such a way to construct a backbone based on minimum connected dominating set. This approach presents a very simple distributed algorithm for computing a small CDS. Backbone nodes in networks can perform efficient routing and broadcasting information. This approach assumes that time slots assignment to the nodes exists such that no two nodes transmit in the same time slot[4]. Coloring algorithm is used to determine such assignment. The execution of this algorithm is divided into rounds and each round consists of three phases. In each phase a conflict–free time slot assignment is used and hence each node is able to transmit once. This technique has a direct impact on the size of several CDS constructions and the relationship between the size of maximal independent set and a minimum CDS in unit disk graph is analyzed which yields better rounds for many other algorithms[4]. b) Stochastic Flooding Broadcast Protocols in Mobile Wireless Networks Julien Cartigny, David Simplot and Jean Carle have proposed a paper “Stochastic Flooding Broadcast Protocols in Mobile Wireless Networks”. The information broadcast based on the flooding protocol in wireless communication environment leads to an overload of network bandwidth. So, each node has to obtain medium access and transmit its
- 2. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 107 IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org _______________________________________________________________________________________ data. However, in dense network the collision probability is very high. In this paper, some improvements of the stochastic flooding protocols were proposed that aim to broadcast given information through the entire network efficiently [2]. The stochastic flooding protocols and its variants works based on five modes of stochastic approaches. The main contributions of this paper are based on stochastic approach, topology adaptability, internal-node- based broadcasting algorithms and neighbor elimination scheme. The mode of flooding protocols may decrease the number of emitted packets and stochastic can offer good variety to generate multiple routes. Probabilistic Scheme gives also better use of energy and offers a better average use of the battery. c) Color-Based Broadcasting for Ad Hoc Networks Alireza Keshavarz-Haddad, Vinay Ribeiroz and Rudolf Riedi have proposed a paper “Color-Based Broadcasting for Ad Hoc Networks”. This paper presents a color-based broadcast technique for wireless ad hoc networks where for each forwarding of the broadcast message a unique color is assigned from different set of colors. The message is forwarded by the node only if a color is assigned from color set which it has not already overheard after a random time. In the closely related counter-based broadcast scheme the number of broadcasts is counted by a node but the colors overheard are not counted. The forwarding nodes form a backbone, which is determined by the random timers[3]. The color- generated backbone nodes exhibit a connectivity graph richer than the counter-based ones. The different color shows geometric properties of the backbones which proves that the sizes of both color- and counter-generated backbones are within a small constant factor of the optimum. Two techniques, boosting and edge-growing, are proposed that improve the performance of color and counter based broadcast in terms of reachability and number of rebroadcasts. d) SLAW: A Mobility Model for Human Walks Kyunghan Lee (KAIST), Seongik Hong (NCSU), Seong Joon Kim (NCSU), Injong Rhee (NCSU) and Song Chong (KAIST) have proposed a paper, “SLAW: A Mobility Model for Human Walks”. In mobile networks, the movement patterns of mobile holders decide the performance of networking applications. The humans have control of mobility and such mobile networks are simulated by their mobility patterns. Simulation tools are used to deploy real mobile networks and can be used for performance evaluation. This paper presents a new mobility model, called Self similar Least- Action Walk (SLAW), which produces synthetic mobility traces. SLAW acts as an important tool for matching human walk behaviors and it can be applied in traffic predications and biological virus spread evaluation where human mobility traces are important. SLAW needs only a few input parameters such as the walk-about area size, the number of walkers, and the Hurst value used for fractal waypoints generation. SLAW development relies on GPS traces of human walks including 226 daily traces collected from 101 volunteers in five different outdoor sites [6]. Many traces are gathered among people those who share the common interests like students in the same university and tourists spot. SLAW expresses the regular and spontaneous trip patterns available in the daily movement of humans. People may visit same places but may at the same time, make irregular trips. The order of visiting places may be random. The main work of this paper is to express and analyze the regularity and spontaneity by emulating a human mobility model. The study shows that SLAW identifies the unique features of various DTN routing protocols compared to random mobility techniques. Also it gives a clear performance analysis about protocols those may and may not utilize past contact history information among nodes to predict the future contact probability information. e) Flash Flooding: Exploring the capture effect for Rapid flooding in Wireless Sensor Networks Jiakang Lu and Kamin Whitehouse proposed flash flooding protocol for rapid network flooding in wireless sensor networks. The Flash flooding protocol allows concurrent transmissions among neighboring nodes[5]. It relied on the capture effect to ensure that each node receives the flood from at least one of its neighbors. This flash flooding approach is divided into three parts: Flash- I illustrates complete concurrency such that the nodes repeat the message as soon as they receive it, even if their neighbors are still transmitting. Flash-II illustrates Maintained Concurrency such that nodes use MAC delay to wait for all neighbors to finish transmitting. Flash-III illustrates Controlled Concurrency which improves flooding throughput in low-duty cycle networks. This protocol approached the theoretical lower bound on flooding latency and does not compromise reliability or power consumption. f) Gossip-Based Ad Hoc Routing Zygmunt Haas Joseph Y. Halpern Li Li designed a gossip based approach to reduce the overhead problem. Gossip protocol acts as a communication protocol which is used to overcome the unreliable communication, data redundancy, unbounded information and overhead problem. The basic idea of the gossip protocol is that few nodes may receive the message frequently and others don’t receive the message since gossip message dies out quickly during the data network transmission. They skipped this problem by setting a gossiping probability between 0.6 and 0.8 during every execution in dense network. Gossiping when combined with flooding technique yields good results which shows that 35% of message overhead is reduced in terms of throughput
- 3. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 6 Issue: 7 106 - 108 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 108 IJRITCC | July 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org _______________________________________________________________________________________ and latency [1].The probability rate is increases if it is success and decreases to 0 if it is a failure and they come to an conclusion that each intermediate node receiving the packet will gossip with the probability carried in the route request packet. Gossiping is still being useful even when global messages aresent. III.PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS From all the above mentioned paper the performance metrics analyzed are Latency, HOP count, Network Reachability or Network size and number of retransmissions. The analyzed metrics are consolidated in the Table.1 below: Table 1: Performance Metrics PROTOCOL S PERFORMANCE METRICS Latency HOP Count Size/Rea chability Rebroadcast UDG <11.4ms 22 3.5 - SFB .6 30 - 0.7 CBB 3ms 50 95% <2 SLAW 0.7m 40 - - Flas h 10.8 sec 20 -10db 6 Gossip- Based 20ms 150 30-40% 5 IV. CONCLUSION Broadcasting is one of the primary issues in the entire wireless network and transmission of data through proper channel without any loss of data is a very difficult task. In this paper a review of broadcasting Protocol was made and their effects on the network are discussed. From all the above mentioned paper decided that it is possible to reduce the rebroadcasting, latency time of data by using any one of the protocol. It is seen that the observations are found to be good on different broadcasting schemes. REFERENCES [1] K. Lee, S. Hong, S. J. Kim, I. Rhee, and S. Chong, “SLAW: A new mobility model for human walks,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., 2009, pp. 855–863. [2] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955. (references) [3] J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73. [4] I. S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350. [5] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished. [6] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name Stand. Abbrev., in press. [7] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982]. [8] M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989. [9] Electronic Publication: Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs): Article in a journal: [10] D. Kornack and P. Rakic, “Cell Proliferation without Neurogenesis in Adult Primate Neocortex,” Science, vol. 294, Dec. 2001, pp. 2127-2130, doi:10.1126/science.1065467. Article in a conference proceedings: [11] H. Goto, Y. Hasegawa, and M. Tanaka, “Efficient Scheduling Focusing on the Duality of MPL Representatives,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Computational Intelligence in Scheduling (SCIS 07), IEEE Press, Dec. 2007, pp. 57-64, doi:10.1109/SCIS.2007.357670. [12] M. Ramkumar, N. Memon, KPI: A Security Infrastructure for Trusted Devices, Pre-Conference. [13] J. Cartigny, D. Simplot, and J. Carle, “Stochastic flooding broadcast protocols in mobile wireless networks,” LIFL, Univ. Lille1,Lille, France, Tech. Rep.,2003. [14] J. Lu and K. Whitehouse, “Flash flooding: Exploiting the capture effect for rapid flooding in wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., 2009, pp. 2491– 2499. [15] Zhou, L. and Haas, Z. J., “Securing ad hoc networks”, IEEE Network, Volume 13, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 1999, pp. 24 – 30