Climate Change & Water Crisis Around The World

Short-changed on
climate change
Money, water and the people
on the frontline
WaterAid/DRIK/HabibulHaque
WaterAid/ChilesheChanda

Short-changed on climate change2
Foreword Three key points:
Most of the poorest countries in
the world are also the ones highly
vulnerable to the impacts of climate
change. They are also the countries
that have contributed least to
the crisis.
Clean water is a first line defence,
but the most climate-vulnerable
countries have some of the lowest
levels of clean water access in
the world.
Only 5% of climate finance is spent
on helping countries adapt to
climate change. Even less is spent
in the most vulnerable countries,
and less still on vital services like
clean water, placing billions of
lives at risk.9
The time for action is now.
For the world’s poorest people, the
climate crisis is a water crisis that
they are living with now.
Climate change is affecting every aspect of
life on the planet, putting the lives of the
most vulnerable people under threat and
multiplying risks they are already struggling
with. The world urgently needs to make
the shift to a low-carbon future to avoid
irreversible damage to our planet.
But the more we allow global temperatures
to rise, the greater the impact will be felt
through our water. Without access to
a water service that can withstand the
impacts of climate change, communities
cannot be resilient to anything.
The water crisis has been around for
decades. Despite significant progress,
around 800 million people still live without
even a village water-pump or covered‑well
close to home. Two billion people live
without a water service that is free from
contamination, putting them at risk of
water-borne disease and death.1
For
these people, clean water is the difference
between coping and not coping.
The need for sustainable safely managed
water and sanitation services couldn’t be
more urgent as threats – such as rapid
and unregulated urbanisation, pollution,
over‑extraction of water for industrial
use, and changing agricultural practices –
escalate rapidly into crises, with almost 90%
of all natural disasters being water-related.2
Climate change is accelerating these
threats as weather patterns become more
unpredictable: how much, how often, and
how intensively it rains, and the frequency
and severity of extreme events. The
more global heating we lock in through
inaction, the more the impacts will be felt
through our water systems. That is why
strengthening access to clean water is a
first line of defence against climate change.
The impacts are being felt across the globe
today, exacerbating pressure on already
stretched water supplies, whether you
live in bustling Cape Town or the slums
of Chennai. In 2018, Mozambique was
hit by unprecedented droughts that
caused severe water shortages in the
capital city. A year later, the same country
was hit by two cyclones and flash flooding
that stretched across the country. Both
these events are increasingly regular
occurrences, threatening already weak
water and sanitation governance and
service supply systems.
Just last month, in the UK – a country that
is both wealthy and relatively invulnerable
to climate change – severe flooding has
caused challenges to water access, but
a well-developed sector has been able
to respond effectively.

wateraid.org 3
What makes a water service
climate‑resilient?
Climate change is a global issue
that causes local problems – so each
individual context and location needs to
be assessed for risks to understand the
different threats at play. Interventions
are then designed to respond to
these threats. 
Different types of approaches must
be assessed for how effectively they
can manage climate and other risks,
and the most resilient and robust
options must be selected.
Communities must be empowered
to manage risk and respond to
hazards continually.
Strong institutions and a strong water
sector must be in place to resist and
recover from extreme events, and
work to rapidly restore water services
in the face of disasters.
Safe water
An on-premise water supply that is
reliable and free from contamination. Both
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 and
the human right to water refers to a safe
water supply.
Clean water
Also called a basic water supply. This refers
to water that is from a source constructed
to protect the water from contamination
such as a village handpump or a covered
well that can be collected within 30 minutes
for a roundtrip including queuing.
The greatest injustice is that the people
who will suffer the most have done the
least to cause the climate crisis. The entire
continent of Africa accounts for less than
4% of total global carbon emissions,3
but
is home to 33 of the 50 countries that are
most vulnerable to climate change.4
Millions
of people who are already denied access
to the basic human right to safe water are
seeing this precious resource under even
greater threat, whilst the major contributors
to climate change are the countries that are
most able to cope.
Without urgent action, the amount it will
cost for developing countries to adapt to
the impacts of climate change that are
already happening is expected to soar.5
Just bringing safely managed water and
toilets to low and middle-income countries
is predicted to cost $198 billion a year.
Climate change will push this cost higher,
with a further $103 billion required for
flood protection.6
Providing safe water for
an entire population, in the face of climate
change is too big a challenge for developing
countries to face alone.
Bringing clean water to everyone,
everywhere is one of the best investments
to protect the lives of people today. It’s also
an investment that brings high rates of
return. For every $1 invested in water and
sanitation, there is an economic return of $4
by keeping people healthy and productive.7
The countries in which WaterAid works in
are on the frontline of climate change right
now. Every day, we see how the impacts of
actions taken – or not taken – by those with
the power to bring about change, play out
as daily realities for some of the poorest
people on the planet.
Globally, average temperatures are
1 degree higher than they were a century
ago, and even carbon emissions were
reversed tomorrow, a further 0.5 degree
rise is locked in.8
We can expect more
extreme weather events, more uncertainty
and likely more people forced to live
without safe water. We have to act and
we have to act now.

In the communities we work in, we are
already seeing the impacts today:
Functional water sources can break
down – because of increased pressure
placed on them by people whose other
water sources have dried up. There is
sometimes no capacity to repair them in
a timely manner.
Shallow water sources, such as hand dug
wells, can dry up completely and people,
usually women and girls, have to walk
further for water.
Floods destroy sanitation systems,
contaminating water sources and
the surrounding communities with
human waste.
Healthcare facilities are overwhelmed
as the impact of the above takes its toil
on peoples’ health.
Conflict arises between different
members of a community or
neighbouring communities who are
competing over scarce water resources.
This conflict often further marginalises
older people, those with disabilities,
a different lifestyle e.g. nomadic or
pastoral and women. Sometimes this
can lead to cross-border tensions
over shared water resources.
Climate change is exacerbating existing
pressure on water access – often caused
by poor governance, lack of political will
and low levels of investment. In the past
few years, we’ve seen the real-world
consequences of many of these issues
play out on a large scale in some of the
most populous metropolises, tourist
hubs and trade centres. As the impacts
of climate change continue to bite, we
can expect to see similar situations
play out again and again.
On the frontline Chennai
In June 2019, one of India’s largest cities
ran out of water for its people to drink
following an extended period without
rain that led to the city’s four main
reservoirs drying up. Poor regulation
and management of water resources
combined with the lengthy dry spell
put too much pressure on the already
overstretched water supplies, leaving
millions dependent on water supplied
from trucks.
Cape Town
Population growth, a three‑year long
drought and weaknesses in predicting
the impacts of the effect of the changing
climate on water resources led residents
of Cape Town to face ‘Day Zero’ – the
day when the city would run completely
dry – in 2018. A huge government
water‑conservation campaign, coupled
with governance reform, helped to
prevent that day from ever being
reached, but it served as a stark warning
to other major cities.

wateraid.org 5
Methodology
This report uses publicly available data
to analyse how climate finance is spent
in the most climate‑vulnerable countries,
with a particular focus on how money is
spent on water, sanitation and hygiene
(WASH) adaptation.
Data sources
Climate vulnerability data: taken from
the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative
(ND-GAIN) which ranks 181 countries
annually based upon their vulnerability
and their readiness to successfully adapt
to climate change. The latest annual
figures from 2017 were used. Data available
at: gain.nd.edu/our-work/country‑index/
WASH is included in this index as measure
of vulnerability, reflecting how low levels
of access to these basic services can make
a country vulnerable. A WASH-adjusted
version of this measure was created by
removing WASH-linked indicators to ensure
that this does not create a false correlation
when graphed against WASH data.
Water access data: taken from
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme
on household WASH access. Data available
at: washdata.org/reports
Climate finance data: Climate finance
data was extracted from the OECD Creditor
Reporting System (CRS) in January 2020.
It includes all entries into the CRS tagged
with the climate ‘Rio Marker’, and is defined
as gross disbursements at constant prices.
This data was analysed from 2010–2017
and divided by population to identify
a per capita and per year breakdown.
Data available at: stats.oecd.org/Index.
aspx?DataSetCode=CRS1
Population data: taken from the World
Bank. Data available at: data.worldbank.
org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Full appendix of individual country data is
available at: washmatters.wateraid.org/
short-changed-on-climate-change
Bangladesh
Two-thirds of Bangladesh sits less than
five metres above sea level, leaving
these areas highly susceptible to river
and tidal flooding.10
Weak coastal land
management and unregulated shrimp
farming practices adds significantly to
this problem. Saltwater intrusion into
already limited drinking water supplies
is causing health problems, forcing
communities to use other unsafe
sources of water to drink.
Maputo
Mozambique’s capital city was hit by
unprecedented droughts that caused
severe water shortages in the capital city
in 2018, exacerbated by a weak capacity
to effectively adapt in the short term.
A year later, the same country was hit
by two cyclones and flash flooding that
stretched across the country. Both these
weather events are increasingly regular
and predictable occurrences, threatening
already weak water and sanitation
governance and service supply systems.

Climate finance is investment aimed at both
reducing emissions that contribute to climate
change, and adaptive actions to minimise the
negative impacts of climate change.
Climate finance flows through various
channels, but the main mechanisms are:
Multilateral climate funds: these are
initiatives that are governed by various
countries. The largest multilateral
climate fund is currently the Green
Climate Fund. Developed country
governments pay into these funds
as part of their obligations under
the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Bilateral climate funds: this is when
money flows from one government
to another, usually through an
existing development agency.
Private finance: Private sources of
climate finance are mainly used for
renewable energy and green transport
rather than climate adaptation.8
In 2017–2018 a total of $579 billion was
provided as climate finance, from both
public and private actors. Of this, public
finance – from multilateral and bilateral
sources – accounted for $253 billion or
44%. Very little of this goes towards the
countries experiencing the impacts of
climate change now.9
What is climate finance?
What about adaptation?
Both mitigation (cutting carbon emissions)
and adaptation (managing threats from
climate change) are essential to protect
people and the planet. But for the
communities WaterAid works in, climate
change is happening now, and solutions are
urgently needed. An additional 0.5 degrees
celsius of of warming is already locked in,8
so helping communities to adapt to the
impacts that are already inevitable is vital.
Almost all climate finance for adaptation
comes from public sources, but it still only
accounts for around $30 billion or 5% of
the total. This is also a global figure – not
just money spent on helping the most
vulnerable countries.9
WaterAid/ DRIK/ Habibul HaqueWaterAid/ Tom Greenwood

wateraid.org 7
What about development finance?
It’s estimated that achieving the Sustainable
Developmental Goal (SDG) targets on
universal safe water and sanitation by
2030 will cost low- and middle-income
countries US $198 billion a year,6
with more
investment required for climate adaptions.
Current levels of investment are
substantially below what is required,
with over 80% of countries reporting
insufficient finance to achieve national
targets.13
Given the size of the gap, there
is an urgent need to mobilise more
public and private finance for developing
countries – including domestic resources
and international aid. In the face of
climate change it is vital that climate
finance complements these resources,
because delivering a water service that
can withstand the impacts of climate
change will cost more money. This can be
from the higher costs of climate resilient
technologies or the increased frequency
that infrastructure needs to be replaced,
but also from building up the skills required
to effectively manage increased risks.
Half of all countries
get less than $5.20 per
head, per year to help
them cope with the
climate crisis. Some of
the most vulnerable
countries get a lot
less than this.12
WaterAid/ Ernest Randriarimalala

Key
Funding is greater
than $10 per
head, per year
Funding is less than
$10 per head, per year
Where are the top fifty most
climate-vulnerable countries?4
Sudan is the 7th
most climate-vulnerable country in
the world, yet receives just $1 per person, per year.
How is climate finance
spent in vulnerable
countries?
There is very little correlation between
how vulnerable a country is and how
much money it receives to help to
respond to the climate crisis.
There is an imminent crisis facing
developing countries as the impacts of
climate change begin to bite. However,
the low levels of spending on the most
vulnerable countries and communities
shows that there is no clear plan as to how
to address this. Not only is investment
vastly below where it needs to be, the
money that is spent is allocated without
prioritising those most in need.
There are some vulnerable countries that
have received higher amounts of climate
finance per person – mainly small island
developing states (SIDS) in the Pacific
Ocean. However, absolute amounts for
these countries are still modest compared
to the challenges they face. For example,
one-third of people who live in SIDS live on
land that is less than five meters above sea
level. The scale of climate finance received
– around $14 million in total a year for
Tuvalu, $5 million for Nauru, and $7 million
for Palau12
– does not match the existential
threats posed by sea level rise, storm surges
and coastal destruction.
Low levels of inefficiently allocated
climate finance is failing to effectively help
countries prepare for climate change and
placing billions of lives at risk. It is also a
misuse of development assistance to not
spend it in ways that support the poorest
people who will suffer the most.

wateraid.org 9
Vulnerable countries*
which receive the least climate finance:
Climate
vulnerability rank4
Country Total climate finance per
head per year, 2010–2017 ($)12
29 Yemen 1.17
7 Sudan 1.33
46 Angola 1.58
16 Central African Republic 1.61
12 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.27
35 Guinea 2.93
40 Togo 3.06
34 Zimbabwe 3.09
51 India 3.24
44 Republic of the Congo 3.31
*
vulnerable countries defined as those with a vulnerability ranking above 0.5
WaterAid/FrehiwotGebrewold
WaterAid/BasileOuedraogo

0
10
20
40
30
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
110
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Climatefinanceperhead,peryear($)9
Vulnerability
More climate-vulnerable
There is little consistency between how climate-vulnerable a country is
and how much climate finance it receives
Climate vulnerability compared with how much climate finance a country receives
per head, per year 2010–2017
Somoa, Vanatu and Tonga
Three small island developing
states all facing existential
threats from climate change

wateraid.org 11
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7
rating4
Key
Funding is greater than $10 per head, per year
Funding is less than $10 per head, per year
Somalia
Climate vulnerability rank: 1
Climate finance per head: $5
Sudan
Climate vulnerability rank: 7
Climate finance per head: $1

Clean water is a first line of defence against
climate change – but the countries that are
most vulnerable to climate change have
some of the lowest levels of clean water
access in the world.
800 people still live without clean water
close to home and two billion people live
without safe water, putting them at risk of
water-borne diseases and death.1
Many of
the poorest countries are also the most
vulnerable to the impacts of the climate
crisis. Those same countries often have a
high proportion of people without access to
clean water close to home.
Currently, it is these people and countries
who are forced to face the daily reality of
the impacts that climate change is having
on their water supplies and lives. In many
of the most climate-vulnerable countries,
millions are forced to drink dirty water. Access to WASH services are included as
part of a country’s vulnerability measure,
reflecting how fundamental they are to
climate resilience. When vulnerability is
adjusted to avoid double-counting WASH
indicators and measured against water
access, Niger ranks as the most vulnerable
country in the world. 50% of people in
Niger – around 10 million people – also live
without clean water close to home.1
Mounting instability and conflict across
the Sahel region as well as climate factors
such as increasingly irregular rainfall,
rising temperatures, land degradation and
climate shocks such as flooding are proving
a volatile cocktail; compounding the dire
situation faced by communities already
struggling to survive in this desert nation.
Bringing climate-resilient water to
everyone, everywhere would have a
transformational impact on people’s ability
to adapt to climate change – and to a
country’s overall development.
What has this got to do
with water?
Two billion people
live without a water
service that is free from
contamination, putting
them at risk of water-
borne disease and death.1
WaterAid/DennisLupenga

wateraid.org 13
How many people in the most vulnerable countries lack access to water?
Climate
vulnerability
rank*4
Country % of people
without water
close to home1
Number of people
without clean water
close to home1
1 Niger 50 10,680,027
2 Somalia 48 7,012,106
3 Solomon Islands 32 197,000
4 Micronesia 21 22,622
5 Chad 61 9,129,447
*
WASH-adjusted
1 Niger 2 Somalia 3 Solomon
Islands
4 Micronesia 5 Chad
6 Sudan 7 Liberia 8 Mali 9 Guinea-
Bissau
10 Afghanistan
The top ten most climate‑vulnerable countries also have some of the
lowest levels of water access in the world.
Key
People with access to clean water
close to home
People without access to clean water
close to home

How much money do the countries with the lowest levels of water access
receive for WASH from climate finance?
Country % of people lacking
access to water
close to home1
Climate
vulnerability
ranking4*
Climate finance
for WASH per
person, per year12
Chad 61 5 $0.19
Ethiopia 59 23 $0.39
Papua New Guinea 59 32 $0.82
South Sudan 59 n/a $2.37
Democratic Republic
of the Congo
57 49 $0.29
Burkina Faso 52 19 $1.94
Uganda 51 16 $1.01
Niger 50 1 $0.82
Somalia 48 2 $0.39
Madagascar 46 18 $0.17
*
WASH-adjusted
How is climate finance
spent on water, sanitation
and hygiene?
WaterAid/ DRIK/ Habibul Haque
Despite being a basic human right and
a first line of defence, a paltry amount
of climate finance is currently invested
in getting clean water to everyone,
everywhere. Money for WASH adaptation
accounts for just $9bn, or 1.6%, of total
climate finance.9
The ten countries with the lowest
number of people with access to water
close to home get on average 84 cents per
person1,12
per year to help tackle the
impacts of climate change on their water
services – despite also being some of
the most vulnerable.
This low level of climate finance spent on
WASH services reflects the poor recognition
of how these services can build resilience
to climate change. Not only is clean water
fundamental to development, but it is also
as a critical adaptation strategy for poor
and vulnerable communities.

wateraid.org 15
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage of people who lack access to clean water close to home1
Percentage of people who lack access to clean water close to home1
Africa and Asia
Europe and Americas
Haiti receives 38 cents
per person, per year
Half of countries where
more than 10% of people
do not have water close to
home get less than $1 per
head per year for WASH
service adaptation.9
Many countries with very low levels of
water access receive tiny amounts of
climate finance for WASH projects
Key
Funding is greater than
Funding is less than
Chad receives just 19 cents
Cabo Verde receives $51
Guyana receives $74

Abeba also needs water for cooking and
cleaning so must walk 20 minutes to a
river to get more water.
“I know the water from the river is not
clean and safe for us, but I have no other
option. If the weather continues like this,
it will be very difficult to live here.”
Case study
Abeba, 23, lives with her husband and
nine‑month-old baby in the village in
the Amhara region of northern Ethiopia.
It’s a hot and dry region of the country
and Abeba fetches water from a nearby
hand‑dug well. She has noticed the weather
changing over the years and the effect this
is having on the community.
“Though the place is very dry and hot, the
water situation was much better when we
first came. We used to get two jerry cans
of water per day from the hand-dug well.
However, we can’t get that now because
the water level is decreasing from time
to time. We are now allowed to take only
one jerry can per day.” The World Health
Organization recommends a very minimum
of 20 litres – or one jerry cans a day for
drinking and basic hygiene purposes, but
the optimum amount is 50 litres – or two
and a half jerry cans.11
The World Health Organization recommends a very
minimum of 20 litres – or one jerry cans a day for
drinking and basic hygiene purposes, but the optimum
amount is 50 litres – or two and a half jerry cans.11

wateraid.org 17
Clean water is the first line of defence
against climate impacts – whatever those
impacts may be. It brings significant
benefits which boosts the lives and
livelihoods of the poorest and most
vulnerable communities on the planet.
But many of the impacts of climate change
are felt through our water – droughts,
sea level rises, floods – so WASH services
are uniquely vulnerable.
What can we do about it?
Climate change – and how we respond to
it – is the defining challenge of our time.
The need has never been greater or more
urgent, but with significant action change
is possible. The world urgently needs to
make the shift to a low-carbon future to
avoid irreversible damage to our planet.
Getting everyone, everywhere access to
clean water is the single most important
thing we can do to help make people
resilient to climate change.
WaterAid already works with the
communities on the frontline to ensure
reliable access to clean water that is fit for
the future. This requires different skills to
help make communities resilient, but there
are huge capacity gaps in the sector which
means countries are struggling to deliver
sustainable access to clean water.
The world has committed to ensuring
everyone has safely managed WASH
services by 2030 through the SDGs, and for
urgent action on climate change. But far
too little attention, money and ambition
is currently committed to meeting these
interconnected challenges, leaving millions
of people to face an uncertain future.
Taking action on
climate and water
WaterAid/JamesKiyimba

Money
There needs to be a ten-fold increase
in the amount of climate finance that
is spent on getting clean water to
those currently forced to live without,
increasing their ability to cope with
climate impacts.
To help the poorest countries create
effective climate-resilient water
programmes, a pipeline fund needs to
be created that provides these countries
with the technical support needed to
access climate finance.
Priorities
Water services fail because of a lack
of investment in the infrastructure
and support needed to keep services
running. National governments must
prioritise investment in these areas to
build a reliable and properly managed
water service for their people.
National governments must include
clean water access in their national
climate change planning processes.
Climate-resilient WASH services
should be rolled out, monitored
and reported on as a key measure
of how a country is dealing with
the effects of climate change.
What needs to change
People
National governments must develop actionable
strategies to address the huge capacity gaps
that currently exist in the sector in order to bring
climate‑resilient water to all.
Climate planning must include the requirements
for the policy-makers, engineers, planners, builders
and others who can bring clean water services to
everyone in that country.
WaterAid/ Eliza Powell
WaterAid/DennisLupenga

wateraid.org 19
1
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme
(2019). Progress on household drinking water,
sanitation and hygiene, 2000-2017. p.8. New
York: UNICEF/WHO. Available at: washdata.
org/reports (accessed 14 Jan 2020).
2
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk
Reduction (2015). The Human Cost of Weather
Related Disasters 1995-2015. Available at:
unisdr.org/2015/docs/climatechange/
COP21_WeatherDisastersReport_2015_
FINAL.pdf (accessed 14 Jan 2020).
3
BBC (2019). Madrid COP25: what does Africa
want from the UN climate summit? Available
at: bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-50712486
(accessed 14 Jan 2020).
4
University of Notre Dame (2019). Notre
Dame Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN).
Available at: gain.nd.edu/our-work/
country-index/ (accessed 8 Jan 2020).
5
New Climate Economy (2018). The 2018
report of the global commission on the
economy and climate – section four:
water. Available at: newclimateeconomy.
report/2018/water/ (accessed 15 Jan 2020).
6
World Bank (2019). Beyond the Gap: How
Countries Can Afford the Infrastructure They
Need while Protecting the Planet. Available
at: openknowledge.worldbank.org/
handle/10986/31291 (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
7
World Health Organization (2012). Global
costs and benefits of drinking-water supply
and sanitation interventions to reach the MDG
target and universal coverage. Available: who.
int/water_sanitation_health/publications/
global_costs/en/ (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
8
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (2018). Special Report: Global
Warming of 1.5oC: Summary for
Policymakers. Available at: ipcc.ch/sr15/
chapter/spm/ (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
9
Climate Policy Initiative (2019). Global
landscape of climate finance. Available at:
climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/
global-landscape-of-climate-finance-2019/
10
Environmental Justice Foundation.
Climate Displacement in Bangladesh.
Available at: ejfoundation.org/reports/
climate-displacement-in-bangladesh
(accessed 20 Dec 2019).
11
WHO (2019). UN-Water global analysis
and assessment of sanitation and drinking
water (GLAAS) 2019 report. Available
at: who.int/water_sanitation_health/
publications/glaas-report-2019/en/
12
OECD. Creditor Reporting System.
Available at: stats.oecd.org/Index.
aspx?DataSetCode=CRS1 (accessed
19 Dec 2019).
13
World Health Organization.
Water Services for Health. Available at:
who.int/globalchange/ecosystems/
water/en/ (accessed 25 Feb 2020).
References

WaterAid is a registered charity
Australia: ABN 99 700 687 141.
Canada: 119288934 RR0001.
India: U85100DL2010NPL200169.
Sweden: Org.nr: 802426-1268, PG: 90 01 62-9, BG: 900-1629.
Japan: 特定非営利活動法人ウォーターエイドジャパン
(認定NPO法人) WaterAid Japan is a specified non-profit corporation
(certified NPO corporation)
UK: 288701 (England and Wales) and SC039479 (Scotland).
US: WaterAid America is a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization.
WaterAid/SibtainHaider

Climate Change & Water Crisis Around The World

More Related Content

What's hot (16)

Similar to Climate Change & Water Crisis Around The World (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Climate Change & Water Crisis Around The World