Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making

Abstract
Companies have realized they need to hire data scientists, academic institutions are scrambling to put together
data-science programs, and publications are touting data science as a hot—even ‘‘sexy’’—career choice. However,
there is confusion about what exactly data science is, and this confusion could lead to disillusionment as the
concept diffuses into meaningless buzz. In this article, we argue that there are good reasons why it has been hard to
pin down exactly what is data science. One reason is that data science is intricately intertwined with other
important concepts also of growing importance, such as big data and data-driven decision making. Another reason
is the natural tendency to associate what a practitioner does with the definition of the practitioner’s field; this can
result in overlooking the fundamentals of the field. We believe that trying to define the boundaries of data science
precisely is not of the utmost importance. We can debate the boundaries of the field in an academic setting, but in
order for data science to serve business effectively, it is important (i) to understand its relationships to other
important related concepts, and (ii) to begin to identify the fundamental principles underlying data science. Once
we embrace (ii), we can much better understand and explain exactly what data science has to offer. Furthermore,
only once we embrace (ii) should we be comfortable calling it data science. In this article, we present a perspective
that addresses all these concepts. We close by offering, as examples, a partial list of fundamental principles
underlying data science.
Introduction
With vast amounts of data now available, companies in
almost every industry are focused on exploiting data for
competitive advantage. The volume and variety of data have
far outstripped the capacity of manual analysis, and in some
cases have exceeded the capacity of conventional databases.
At the same time, computers have become far more powerful,
networking is ubiquitous, and algorithms have been devel-
oped that can connect datasets to enable broader and deeper
analyses than previously possible. The convergence of these
phenomena has given rise to the increasingly widespread
business application of data science.
Companies across industries have realized that they need to
hire more data scientists. Academic institutions are scram-
bling to put together programs to train data scientists. Pub-
lications are touting data science as a hot career choice and
even ‘‘sexy.’’1
However, there is confusion about what exactly
is data science, and this confusion could well lead to
1
Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York.
2
Data Scientists, LLC, New York, New York and Mountain View, California.
DATA SCIENCE
AND ITS
RELATIONSHIP
TO BIG DATA AND
DATA-DRIVEN
DECISION MAKING
Foster Provost1
and Tom Fawcett2
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
DOI: 10.1089/big.2013.1508 MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 1 NO. 1 MARCH 2013 BIG DATA BD51

disillusionment as the concept diffuses into meaningless buzz.
In this article, we argue that there are good reasons why it has
been hard to pin down what exactly is data science. One
reason is that data science is intricately intertwined with other
important concepts, like big data and data-driven decision
making, which are also growing in importance and attention.
Another reason is the natural tendency, in the absence of
academic programs to teach one otherwise, to associate what
a practitioner actually does with the definition of the prac-
titioner’s field; this can result in overlooking the fundamen-
tals of the field.
At the moment, trying to define the boundaries of data sci-
ence precisely is not of foremost importance. Data-science
academic programs are being developed, and in an academic
setting we can debate its boundaries. However, in order for
data science to serve business effectively, it is important (i) to
understand its relationships to these other important and
closely related concepts, and (ii) to
begin to understand what are the
fundamental principles underlying
data science. Once we embrace
(ii), we can much better under-
stand and explain exactly what
data science has to offer. Further-
more, only once we embrace (ii)
should we be comfortable calling it data science.
In this article, we present a perspective that addresses all these
concepts. We first work to disentangle this set of closely in-
terrelated concepts. In the process, we highlight data science
as the connective tissue between data-processing technologies
(including those for ‘‘big data’’) and data-driven decision
making. We discuss the complicated issue of data science as a
field versus data science as a profession. Finally, we offer as
examples a list of some fundamental principles underlying
data science.
Data Science
At a high level, data science is a set of fundamental principles
that support and guide the principled extraction of infor-
mation and knowledge from data. Possibly the most closely
related concept to data science is data mining—the actual
extraction of knowledge from data via technologies that in-
corporate these principles. There are hundreds of different
data-mining algorithms, and a great deal of detail to the
methods of the field. We argue that underlying all these many
details is a much smaller and more concise set of fundamental
principles.
These principles and techniques are applied broadly across
functional areas in business. Probably the broadest business
applications are in marketing for tasks such as targeted
marketing, online advertising, and recommendations for
cross-selling. Data science also is applied for general customer
relationship management to analyze customer behavior in
order to manage attrition and maximize expected customer
value. The finance industry uses data science for credit scoring
and trading and in operations via fraud detection and work-
force management. Major retailers from Wal-Mart to Amazon
apply data science throughout their businesses, from mar-
keting to supply-chain management. Many firms have differ-
entiated themselves strategically with data science, sometimes
to the point of evolving into data-mining companies.
But data science involves much more than just data-mining
algorithms. Successful data scientists must be able to view
business problems from a data perspective. There is a fun-
damental structure to data-analytic thinking, and basic
principles that should be understood. Data science draws
from many ‘‘traditional’’ fields of study. Fundamental prin-
ciples of causal analysis must be understood. A large portion
of what has traditionally been studied within the field of
statistics is fundamental to data
science. Methods and methology
for visualizing data are vital. There
are also particular areas where
intuition, creativity, common
sense, and knowledge of a partic-
ular application must be brought
to bear. A data-science perspective
provides practitioners with structure and principles, which
give the data scientist a framework to systematically treat
problems of extracting useful knowledge from data.
Data Science in Action
For concreteness, let’s look at two brief case studies of ana-
lyzing data to extract predictive patterns. These studies il-
lustrate different sorts of applications of data science. The
first was reported in the New York Times:
Hurricane Frances was on its way, barreling across
the Caribbean, threatening a direct hit on Florida’s
Atlantic coast. Residents made for higher ground,
but far away, in Bentonville, Ark., executives at Wal-
Mart Stores decided that the situation offered a great
opportunity for one of their newest data-driven
weapons.predictive technology.
A week ahead of the storm’s landfall, Linda M.
Dillman, Wal-Mart’s chief information officer,
pressed her staff to come up with forecasts based on
what had happened when Hurricane Charley struck
several weeks earlier. Backed by the trillions of bytes’
worth of shopper history that is stored in Wal-
Mart’s data warehouse, she felt that the company
could ‘‘start predicting what’s going to happen, in-
stead of waiting for it to happen,’’ as she put it.2
Consider why data-driven prediction might be useful in this
scenario. It might be useful to predict that people in the path
‘‘PUBLICATIONS ARE TOUTING
DATA SCIENCE AS A HOT CAREER
CHOICE AND EVEN ‘SEXY.’’’
DATA SCIENCE AND BIG DATA
Provost and Fawcett
52BD BIG DATA MARCH 2013

of the hurricane would buy more bottled water. Maybe, but it
seems a bit obvious, and why do we need data science to
discover this? It might be useful to project the amount of
increase in sales due to the hurricane, to ensure that local
Wal-Marts are properly stocked. Perhaps mining the data
could reveal that a particular DVD sold out in the hurricane’s
path—but maybe it sold out that week at Wal-Marts across
the country, not just where the hurricane landing was im-
minent. The prediction could be somewhat useful, but
probably more general than Ms. Dillman was intending.
It would be more valuable to discover patterns due to the
hurricane that were not obvious. To do this, analysts might
examine the huge volume of Wal-Mart data from prior,
similar situations (such as Hurricane Charley earlier in the
same season) to identify unusual local demand for products.
From such patterns, the company might be able to anticipate
unusual demand for products and
rush stock to the stores ahead of
the hurricane’s landfall.
Indeed, that is what happened.
The New York Times reported
that: ‘‘. the experts mined the
data and found that the stores
would indeed need certain prod-
ucts—and not just the usual
flashlights. ‘We didn’t know in the
past that strawberry Pop-Tarts
increase in sales, like seven times their normal sales rate,
ahead of a hurricane,’ Ms. Dillman said in a recent interview.’
And the pre-hurricane top-selling item was beer.*’’’2
Consider a second, more typical business scenario and how it
might be treated from a data perspective. Assume you just
landed a great analytical job with MegaTelCo, one of the
largest telecommunication firms in the United States. They
are having a major problem with customer retention in their
wireless business. In the mid-Atlantic region, 20% of cell-
phone customers leave when their contracts expire, and it is
getting increasingly difficult to acquire new customers. Since
the cell-phone market is now saturated, the huge growth in
the wireless market has tapered off. Communications com-
panies are now engaged in battles to attract each other’s
customers while retaining their own. Customers switching
from one company to another is called churn, and it is ex-
pensive all around: one company must spend on incentives to
attract a customer while another company loses revenue
when the customer departs.
You have been called in to help understand the problem and
to devise a solution. Attracting new customers is much more
expensive than retaining existing ones, so a good deal of
marketing budget is allocated to prevent churn. Marketing
has already designed a special retention offer. Your task is to
devise a precise, step-by-step plan for how the data science
team should use MegaTelCo’s vast data resources to decide
which customers should be offered the special retention deal
prior to the expiration of their contracts. Specifically, how
should MegaTelCo decide on the set of customers to target to
best reduce churn for a particular incentive budget? An-
swering this question is much more complicated than it
seems initially.
Data Science and Data-Driven
Decision Making
Data science involves principles, processes, and techniques
for understanding phenomena via the (automated) analysis
of data. For the perspective of this article, the ultimate goal of
data science is improving deci-
sion making, as this generally is
of paramount interest to busi-
ness. Figure 1 places data science
in the context of other closely
related and data-related pro-
cesses in the organization. Let’s
start at the top.
Data-driven decision making
(DDD)3
refers to the practice of
basing decisions on the analysis
of data rather than purely on intuition. For example, a
marketer could select advertisements based purely on her
long experience in the field and her eye for what will work.
Or, she could base her selection on the analysis of data re-
garding how consumers react to different ads. She could also
use a combination of these approaches. DDD is not an all-or-
nothing practice, and different firms engage in DDD to
greater or lesser degrees.
The benefits of data-driven decision making have been dem-
onstrated conclusively. Economist Erik Brynjolfsson and his
colleagues from MIT and Penn’s Wharton School recently
conducted a study of how DDD affects firm performance.3
They developed a measure of DDD that rates firms as to how
strongly they use data to make decisions across the company.
They show statistically that the more data-driven a firm is, the
more productive it is—even controlling for a wide range of
possible confounding factors. And the differences are not small:
one standard deviation higher on the DDD scale is associated
with a 4–6% increase in productivity. DDD also is correlated
with higher return on assets, return on equity, asset utilization,
and market value, and the relationship seems to be causal.
Our two example case studies illustrate two different sorts of
decisions: (1) decisions for which ‘‘discoveries’’ need to be
‘‘FROM SUCH PATTERNS, THE
COMPANY MIGHT BE ABLE TO
ANTICIPATE UNUSUAL DEMAND
FOR PRODUCTS AND RUSH STOCK
TO THE STORES AHEAD OF THE
HURRICANE’S LANDFALL.’’
*Of course! What goes better with strawberry Pop-Tarts than a nice cold beer?
Provost and Fawcett
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 1 NO. 1 MARCH 2013 BIG DATA BD53

made within data, and (2) decisions that repeat, especially at
massive scale, and so decision making can benefit from even
small increases in accuracy based on data analysis. The Wal-
Mart example above illustrates a type-1 problem. Linda
Dillman would like to discover knowledge that will help Wal-
Mart prepare for Hurricane Frances’s imminent arrival. Our
churn example illustrates a type-
2 DDD problem. A large tele-
communications company may
have hundreds of millions of
customers, each a candidate for
defection. Tens of millions of
customers have contracts expir-
ing each month, so each one of
them has an increased likelihood of defection in the near
future. If we can improve our ability to estimate, for a given
customer, how profitable it would be for us to focus on her,
we can potentially reap large benefits by applying this ability
to the millions of customers in the population. This same
logic applies to many of the areas where we have seen the
most intense application of data science and data mining:
direct marketing, online advertising, credit scoring, financial
trading, help-desk management, fraud detection, search
ranking, product recommendation, and so on.
The diagram in Figure 1 shows data science supporting data-
driven decision making, but also overlapping with it. This
highlights the fact that, increasingly, business decisions are
being made automatically by computer systems. Different
industries have adopted automatic decision making at dif-
ferent rates. The finance and telecommunications industries
were early adopters. In the 1990s, automated decision making
changed the banking and consumer-credit industries dra-
matically. In the 1990s, banks and telecommunications
companies also implemented massive-scale systems for
managing data-driven fraud con-
trol decisions. As retail systems
were increasingly computerized,
merchandising decisions were
automated. Famous examples in-
clude Harrah’s casinos’ reward
programs and the automated
recommendations of Amazon and
Netflix. Currently we are seeing a revolution in advertising,
due in large part to a huge increase in the amount of time
consumers are spending online and the ability online to make
(literally) split-second advertising decisions.
Data Processing and ‘‘Big Data’’
Despite the impression one might get from the media, there is
a lot to data processing that is not data science. Data engi-
neering and processing are critical to support data-science
activities, as shown in Figure 1, but they are more general and
are useful for much more. Data-processing technologies are
important for many business tasks that do not involve ex-
tracting knowledge or data-driven decision making, such as
efficient transaction processing, modern web system proces-
sing, online advertising campaign management, and others.
‘‘Big data’’ technologies, such as Hadoop, Hbase, CouchDB,
and others have received considerable media attention re-
cently. For this article, we will simply take big data to mean
datasets that are too large for traditional data-processing
systems and that therefore require new technologies. As with
the traditional technologies, big data technologies are used
for many tasks, including data engineering. Occasionally, big
data technologies are actually used for implementing data-
mining techniques, but more often the well-known big data
technologies are used for data processing in support of the
data-mining techniques and other data-science activities, as
represented in Figure 1.
Economist Prasanna Tambe of New York University’s Stern
School has examined the extent to which the utilization of big
data technologies seems to help firms.4
He finds that, after
controlling for various possible confounding factors, the use
of big data technologies correlates with significant additional
productivity growth. Specifically, one standard deviation higher
utilization of big data technologies is associated with 1–3%
higher productivity than the average firm; one standard devi-
ation lower in terms of big data utilization is associated with
1–3% lower productivity. This leads to potentially very large
productivity differences between the firms at the extremes.
FIG. 1. Data science in the context of closely related processes
in the organization.
‘‘THE BENEFITS OF DATA-DRIVEN
DECISION MAKING HAVE BEEN
DEMONSTRATED CONCLUSIVELY.’’
Provost and Fawcett

From Big Data 1.0 to Big Data 2.0
One way to think about the state of big data technologies is to
draw an analogy with the business adoption of internet
technologies. In Web 1.0, businesses busied themselves with
getting the basic internet technologies in place so that they
could establish a web presence, build electronic commerce
capability, and improve operating efficiency. We can think of
ourselves as being in the era of Big Data 1.0, with firms
engaged in building capabilities to process large data. These
primarily support their current operations—for example, to
make themselves more efficient.
With Web 1.0, once firms had
incorporated basic technologies
thoroughly (and in the process had
driven down prices) they started to
look further. They began to ask
what the web could do for them,
and how it could improve upon
what they’d always done. This
ushered in the era of Web 2.0, in
which new systems and companies
started to exploit the interactive nature of the web. The
changes brought on by this shift in thinking are extensive and
pervasive; the most obvious are the incorporation of social-
networking components and the rise of the ‘‘voice’’ of the
individual consumer (and citizen).
Similarly, we should expect a Big Data 2.0 phase to follow Big
Data 1.0. Once firms have become capable of processing
massive data in a flexible fashion, they should begin asking:
What can I now do that I couldn’t do before, or do better than I
could do before? This is likely to usher in the golden era of data
science. The principles and techniques of data science will be
applied far more broadly and far more deeply than they are
today.
It is important to note that in the Web-1.0 era, some pre-
cocious companies began applying Web-2.0 ideas far ahead
of the mainstream. Amazon is a prime example, incorpo-
rating the consumer’s ‘‘voice’’ early on in the rating of
products and product reviews (and deeper, in the rating of
reviewers). Similarly, we see some companies already ap-
plying Big Data 2.0. Amazon again is a company at the
forefront, providing data-driven recommendations from
massive data. There are other examples as well. Online ad-
vertisers must process extremely large volumes of data (bil-
lions of ad impressions per day is not unusual) and maintain
a very high throughput (real-time bidding systems make
decisions in tens of milliseconds). We should look to these
and similar industries for signs of advances in big data and
data science that subsequently will be adopted by other
industries.
Data-Analytic Thinking
One of the most critical aspects of data science is the support
of data-analytic thinking. Skill at thinking data-analytically is
important not just for the data scientist but throughout the
organization. For example, managers and line employees in
other functional areas will only get the best from the com-
pany’s data-science resources if they have some basic un-
derstanding of the fundamental principles. Managers in
enterprises without substantial data-science resources should
still understand basic principles in order to engage consul-
tants on an informed basis. Investors in data-science ventures
need to understand the funda-
mental principles in order to as-
sess investment opportunities
accurately. More generally, busi-
nesses increasingly are driven by
data analytics, and there is great
professional advantage in being
able to interact competently
with and within such businesses.
Understanding the fundamental
concepts, and having frameworks
for organizing data-analytic thinking, not only will allow one
to interact competently, but will help to envision opportu-
nities for improving data-driven decision making or to see
data-oriented competitive threats.
Firms in many traditional industries are exploiting new and
existing data resources for competitive advantage. They em-
ploy data-science teams to bring advanced technologies to
bear to increase revenue and to decrease costs. In addition,
many new companies are being developed with data mining
as a key strategic component. Facebook and Twitter, along
with many other ‘‘Digital 100’’ companies,5
have high valu-
ations due primarily to data assets they are committed to
capturing or creating.{
Increasingly, managers need to man-
age data-analytics teams and data-analysis projects, marketers
have to organize and understand data-driven campaigns,
venture capitalists must be able to invest wisely in businesses
with substantial data assets, and business strategists must be
able to devise plans that exploit data.
As a few examples, if a consultant presents a proposal to
exploit a data asset to improve your business, you should be
able to assess whether the proposal makes sense. If a com-
petitor announces a new data partnership, you should rec-
ognize when it may put you at a strategic disadvantage. Or,
let’s say you take a position with a venture firm and your first
project is to assess the potential for investing in an advertising
company. The founders present a convincing argument that
they will realize significant value from a unique body of data
they will collect, and on that basis, are arguing for a sub-
stantially higher valuation. Is this reasonable? With an
‘‘SIMILARLY, WE SHOULD
EXPECT A BIG DATA 2.0 PHASE
TO FOLLOW BIG DATA 1.0 . THIS
IS LIKELY TO USHER IN THE
GOLDEN ERA OF DATA SCIENCE.’’
{
Of course, this is not a new phenomenon. Amazon and Google are well-established companies that obtain tremendous value from their data assets.
Provost and Fawcett
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

understanding of the fundamentals of data science, you
should be able to devise a few probing questions to determine
whether their valuation arguments are plausible.
On a scale less grand, but probably more common, data-
analytics projects reach into all business units. Employees
throughout these units must interact with the data-science
team. If these employees do not have a fundamental
grounding in the principles of data-analytic thinking, they
will not really understand what is happening in the business.
This lack of understanding is much more damaging in data-
science projects than in other technical projects, because the
data science supports improved
decision making. Data-science
projects require close interaction
between the scientists and the
business people responsible for the
decision making. Firms in which
the business people do not under-
stand what the data scientists are
doing are at a substantial disad-
vantage, because they waste time
and effort or, worse, because they
ultimately make wrong decisions.
A recent article in Harvard Busi-
ness Review concludes: ‘‘For all the breathless promises about
the return on investment in Big Data, however, companies
face a challenge. Investments in analytics can be useless, even
harmful, unless employees can incorporate that data into
complex decision making.’’6
Some Fundamental Concepts
of Data Science
There is a set of well-studied, fundamental concepts under-
lying the principled extraction of knowledge from data, with
both theoretical and empirical backing. These fundamental
concepts of data science are drawn from many fields that
study data analytics. Some reflect the relationship between
data science and the business problems to be solved. Some
reflect the sorts of knowledge discoveries that can be made
and are the basis for technical solutions. Others are cau-
tionary and prescriptive. We briefly discuss a few here. This
list is not intended to be exhaustive; detailed discussions even
of the handful below would fill a book.* The important thing
is that we understand these fundamental concepts.
Fundamental concept: Extracting useful knowledge from data
to solve business problems can be treated systematically by fol-
lowing a process with reasonably well-defined stages. The Cross-
Industry Standard Process for Data Mining7
(CRISP-DM) is
one codification of this process. Keeping such a process in
mind can structure our thinking about data analytics prob-
lems. For example, in actual practice one repeatedly sees an-
alytical ‘‘solutions’’ that are not based on careful analysis of
the problem or are not carefully evaluated. Structured think-
ing about analytics emphasizes these often underappreciated
aspects of supporting decision making with data. Such
structured thinking also contrasts critical points at which
human intuition and creativity is necessary versus points at
which high-powered analytical tools can be brought to bear.
Fundamental concept: Evaluating data-science results requires
careful consideration of the context in which they will be used.
Whether knowledge extracted from data will aid in decision
making depends critically on the
application in question. For our
churn-management example, how
exactly are we going to use the
patterns that are extracted from
historical data? More generally,
does the pattern lead to better de-
cisions than some reasonable alter-
native? How well would one have
done by chance? How well would
one do with a smart ‘‘default’’ al-
ternative? Many data science eva-
luation frameworks are based on
this fundamental concept.
Fundamental concept: The relationship between the business
problem and the analytics solution often can be decomposed into
tractable subproblems via the framework of analyzing expected
value. Various tools for mining data exist, but business
problems rarely come neatly prepared for their application.
Breaking the business problem up into components corre-
sponding to estimating probabilities and computing or esti-
mating values, along with a structure for recombining the
components, is broadly useful. We have many specific tools
for estimating probabilities and values from data. For our
churn example, should the value of the customer be taken
into account in addition to the likelihood of leaving? It is
difficult to realistically assess any customer-targeting solution
without phrasing the problem as one of expected value.
Fundamental concept: Information technology can be used to
find informative data items from within a large body of data.
One of the first data-science concepts encountered in busi-
ness-analytics scenarios is the notion of finding correlations.
‘‘Correlation’’ often is used loosely to mean data items that
provide information about other data items—specifically,
known quantities that reduce our uncertainty about un-
known quantities. In our churn example, a quantity of in-
terest is the likelihood that a particular customer will leave
after her contract expires. Before the contract expires, this
would be an unknown quantity. However, there may be
known data items (usage, service history, how many friends
‘‘FACEBOOK AND TWITTER,
ALONG WITH MANY OTHER
‘DIGITAL 100’ COMPANIES, HAVE
HIGH VALUATIONS DUE
PRIMARILY TO DATA ASSETS
THEY ARE COMMITTED TO
CAPTURING OR CREATING.’’
*And they do; see http://data-science-for-biz.com.
Provost and Fawcett

have canceled contracts) that correlate with our quantity of
interest. This fundamental concept underlies a vast number
of techniques for statistical analysis, predictive modeling, and
other data mining.
Fundamental concept: Entities that are similar with respect to
known features or attributes often are similar with respect to
unknown features or attributes. Computing similarity is one of
the main tools of data science. There are many ways to
compute similarity and more are invented each year.
Fundamental concept: If you look
too hard at a set of data, you will
find something—but it might not
generalize beyond the data you’re
observing. This is referred to as
‘‘overfitting’’ a dataset. Techniques
for mining data can be very pow-
erful, and the need to detect and
avoid overfitting is one of the most important concepts to
grasp when applying data-mining tools to real problems. The
concept of overfitting and its avoidance permeates data sci-
ence processes, algorithms, and evaluation methods.
Fundamental concept: To draw causal conclusions, one must
pay very close attention to the presence of confounding factors,
possibly unseen ones. Often, it is not enough simply to un-
cover correlations in data; we may want to use our models to
guide decisions on how to influence the behavior producing
the data. For our churn problem, we want to intervene and
cause customer retention. All methods for drawing causal
conclusions—from interpreting the coefficients of regression
models to randomized controlled experiments—incorporate
assumptions regarding the presence or absence of con-
founding factors. In applying such methods, it is important
to understand their assumptions clearly in order to under-
stand the scope of any causal claims.
Chemistry Is Not About Test Tubes: Data
Science vs. the Work of the Data Scientist
Two additional, related complications combine to make it
more difficult to reach a common understanding of just
what is data science and how it fits with other related
concepts.
First is the dearth of academic programs focusing on data
science. Without academic programs defining the field for
us, we need to define the field for ourselves. However, each
of us sees the field from a different perspective and thereby
forms a different conception. The dearth of academic pro-
grams is largely due to the inertia associated with academia
and the concomitant effort involved in creating new aca-
demic programs—especially ones that span traditional dis-
ciplines. Universities clearly see the need for such programs,
and it is only a matter of time before this first complication
will be resolved. For example, in New York City alone, two
top universities are creating degree programs in data sci-
ence. Columbia University is in the process of creating a
master’s degree program within its new Institute for Data
Sciences and Engineering (and has founded a center focus-
ing on the foundations of data science), and NYU will
commence a master’s degree program in data science in
fall 2013.
The second complication builds
on confusion caused by the first.
Workers tend to associate with
their field the tasks they spend
considerable time on or those
they find challenging or reward-
ing. This is in contrast to the tasks
that differentiate the field from
other fields. Forsythe described this phenomenon in an
ethnographic study of practitioners in artificial intelligence
(AI):
The AI specialists I describe view their professional
work as science (and in some cases engineer-
ing).The scientists’ work and the approach they
take to it make sense in relation to a particular view
of the world that is taken for granted in the
laboratory.Wondering what it means to ‘‘do AI,’’
I have asked many practitioners to describe their own
work. Their answers invariably focus on one or more
of the following: problem solving, writing code, and
building systems.8
Forsythe goes on to explain that the AI practitioners focus on
these three activities even when it is clear that they spend
much time doing other things (even less related specifically to
AI). Importantly, none of these three tasks differentiates AI
from other scientific and engineering fields. Clearly just being
very good at these three things does not an AI scientist make.
And as Forsythe points out, technically the latter two are not
even necessary, as the lab director, a famous AI Scientist, had
not written code or built systems for years. Nonetheless, these
are the tasks the AI scientists saw as defining their work—
they apparently did not explicitly consider the notion of what
makes doing AI different from doing other tasks that involve
problem solving, writing code, and system building. (This is
possibly due to the fact that in AI, there were academic dis-
tinctions to call on.)
Taken together, these two complications cause particular
confusion in data science, because there are few academic
distinctions to fall back on, and moreover, due to the state of
the art in data processing, data scientists tend to spend a
majority of their problem-solving time on data preparation
and processing. The goal of such preparation is either to
‘‘WITHOUT ACADEMIC
PROGRAMS DEFINING THE FIELD
FOR US, WE NEED TO DEFINE
THE FIELD FOR OURSELVES.’’
Provost and Fawcett
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

subsequently apply data-science methods or to understand
the results. However, that does not change the fact that the
day-to-day work of a data scientist—especially an entry-level
one—may be largely data processing. This is directly analo-
gous to an entry-level chemist spending the majority of her
time doing technical lab work. If this were all she were trained
to do, she likely would not be rightly called a chemist but
rather a lab technician. Important for being a chemist is that
this work is in support of the application of the science of
chemistry, and hopefully the eventual advancement to jobs
involving more chemistry and less technical work. Similarly
for data science: a chief scientist in a data-science-oriented
company will do much less data processing and more data-
analytics design and interpretation.
At the time of this writing, discussions of data science inev-
itably mention not just the analytical skills but the popular
tools used in such analysis. For example, it is common to see
job advertisements mentioning data-mining techniques
(random forests, support vector machines), specific applica-
tion areas (recommendation systems, ad placement optimi-
zation), alongside popular software tools for processing big
data (SQL, Hadoop, MongoDB). This is natural. The partic-
ular concerns of data science in business are fairly new, and
businesses are still working to figure out how best to address
them. Continuing our analogy, the state of data science may
be likened to that of chemistry in the mid-19th century, when
theories and general principles were being formulated and the
field was largely experimental. Every good chemist had to be a
competent lab technician. Similarly, it is hard to imagine a
working data scientist who is not proficient with certain sorts
of software tools. A firm may be well served by requiring that
their data scientists have skills to access, prepare, and process
data using tools the firm has adopted.
Nevertheless, we emphasize that there is an important reason
to focus here on the general principles of data science. In ten
years’ time, the predominant technologies will likely have
changed or advanced enough that today’s choices would seem
quaint. On the other hand, the general principles of data
science are not so differerent than they were 20 years ago and
likely will change little over the coming decades.
Conclusion
Underlying the extensive collection of techniques for mining
data is a much smaller set of fundamental concepts com-
prising data science. In order for data science to flourish as a
field, rather than to drown in the flood of popular attention,
we must think beyond the algorithms, techniques, and tools
in common use. We must think about the core principles and
concepts that underlie the techniques, and also the systematic
thinking that fosters success in data-driven decision making.
These data science concepts are general and very broadly
applicable.
Success in today’s data-oriented business environment re-
quires being able to think about how these fundamental
concepts apply to particular business problems—to think
data-analytically. This is aided by conceptual frameworks that
themselves are part of data science. For example, the auto-
mated extraction of patterns from data is a process with well-
defined stages. Understanding this process and its stages helps
structure problem solving, makes it more systematic, and
thus less prone to error.
There is strong evidence that business performance can be
improved substantially via data-driven decision making,3
big
data technologies,4
and data-science techniques based on big
data.9,10
Data science supports data-driven decision mak-
ing—and sometimes allows making decisions automatically
at massive scale—and depends upon technologies for ‘‘big
data’’ storage and engineering. However, the principles of
data science are its own and should be considered and dis-
cussed explicitly in order for data science to realize its
potential.
Author Disclosure Statement
F.P. and T.F. are authors of the forthcoming book, Data
Science for Business.
References
1. Davenport T.H., and Patil D.J. Data scientist: the sexiest
job of the 21st century. Harv Bus Rev, Oct 2012.
2. Hays C. L. What they know about you. N Y Times, Nov.
14, 2004.
3. Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L.M., and Kim H.H. Strength in
numbers: How does data-driven decision making affect
firm performance? Working paper, 2011. SSRN working
paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract =
1819486.
4. Tambe P. Big data know-how and business value.
Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business, NY,
New York, 2012.
5. Fusfeld A. The digital 100: the world’s most valuable
startups. Bus Insider. Sep. 23, 2010.
6. Shah S., Horne A., and Capella´ J. Good data won’t
guarantee good decisions. Harv Bus Rev, Apr 2012.
7. Wirth, R., and Hipp, J. CRISP-DM: Towards a stan-
dard process model for data mining. In Proceedings of
the 4th International Conference on the Practical Ap-
plications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
2000, pp. 29–39.
Provost and Fawcett

8. Forsythe, Diana E. The construction of work in artiﬁcial
intelligence. Science, Technology Human Values,
18(4), 1993, pp. 460–479.
9. Hill, S., Provost, F., and Volinsky, C. Network-based
marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer
networks. Statistical Science, 21(2), 2006, pp. 256–276.
10. Martens D. and Provost F. Pseudo-social network tar-
geting from consumer transaction data. Working paper,
CEDER-11-05, Stern School of Business, 2011. Available
at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1934670.
Address correspondence to:
F. Provost
Department of Information, Operations,
and Management Sciences
Leonard N. Stern School of Business
New York University
44 W. 4th Street, 8th
Floor
New York, NY 10012
E-mail: fprovost@stern.nyu.edu
Provost and Fawcett
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

This article has been cited by:
1. Ming-Chi Liu, Yueh-Min Huang. 2017. The use of data science for education: The case of social-emotional learning. Smart
Learning Environments 4:1. . [CrossRef]
2. Guillaume Coqueret. 2017. Approximate NORTA simulations for virtual sample generation. Expert Systems with Applications 73,
69-81. [CrossRef]
3. Marko Bohanec, Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar, Marko Robnik-Šikonja. 2017. Explaining machine learning models in sales predictions.
Expert Systems with Applications 71, 416-428. [CrossRef]
4. Andoni Elola, Javier Del Ser, Miren Nekane Bilbao, Cristina Perfecto, Enrique Alexandre, Sancho Salcedo-Sanz. 2017. Hybridizing
Cartesian Genetic Programming and Harmony Search for adaptive feature construction in supervised learning problems. Applied
Soft Computing 52, 760-770. [CrossRef]
5. Dominikus Kleindienst. 2017. The data quality improvement plan: deciding on choice and sequence of data quality improvements.
Electronic Markets . [CrossRef]
6. Xiaohong Liu, Junfei Chu, Pengzhen Yin, Jiasen Sun. 2017. DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and
ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 142, 877-885.
[CrossRef]
7. Yan Li, Manoj Thomas, Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson, Jason Levy. 2016. Problem Formulation in Knowledge Discovery via Data
Analytics (KDDA) for Environmental Risk Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13:12,
1245. [CrossRef]
8. Yan Li, Manoj A. Thomas, Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson. 2016. A snail shell process model for knowledge discovery via data
analytics. Decision Support Systems 91, 1-12. [CrossRef]
9. Ivana Semanjski, Rik Bellens, Sidharta Gautama, Frank Witlox. 2016. Integrating Big Data into a Sustainable Mobility Policy 2.0
Planning Support System. Sustainability 8:11, 1142. [CrossRef]
10. Shirley Coleman, Rainer Göb, Giuseppe Manco, Antonio Pievatolo, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Marco Seabra Reis. 2016. How Can
SMEs Benefit from Big Data? Challenges and a Path Forward. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32:6, 2151-2164.
[CrossRef]
11. Kayode Ayankoya, Andre P. Calitz, Jean H. Greyling. 2016. Real-Time Grain Commodities Price Predictions in South Africa: A
Big Data and Neural Networks Approach. Agrekon 55:4, 483-508. [CrossRef]
12. Ajaya K. Swain. 2016. Mining big data to support decision making in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology Case and
Application Research 18:3, 141-154. [CrossRef]
13. Shanliang Yang, Mei Yang, Song Wang, Kedi Huang. 2016. Adaptive immune genetic algorithm for weapon system portfolio
optimization in military big data environment. Cluster Computing 19:3, 1359-1372. [CrossRef]
14. Xiangzheng Deng. 2016. Urgent need for a data sharing platform to promote ecological research in China. Ecosystem Health and
Sustainability 2:9, e01241. [CrossRef]
15. Satyanarayana V Nandury, Beneyaz A BegumStrategies to handle big data for traffic management in smart cities 356-364.
[CrossRef]
16. Shaofu Du, Wenzhi Tang, Jiajia Zhao, Tengfei Nie. 2016. Sell to whom? Firm’s green production in competition facing market
segmentation. Annals of Operations Research . [CrossRef]
17. Russell Newman, Victor Chang, Robert John Walters, Gary Brian Wills. 2016. Model and experimental development for Business
Data Science. International Journal of Information Management 36:4, 607-617. [CrossRef]
18. Lisbeth Rodríguez-Mazahua, Cristian-Aarón Rodríguez-Enríquez, José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes, Jair Cervantes, Jorge Luis
García-Alcaraz, Giner Alor-Hernández. 2016. A general perspective of Big Data: applications, tools, challenges and trends. The
Journal of Supercomputing 72:8, 3073-3113. [CrossRef]
19. Samuel T. McAbee, Ronald S. Landis, Maura I. Burke. 2016. Inductive reasoning: The promise of big data. Human Resource
Management Review . [CrossRef]
20. Il-Yeol Song, Yongjun Zhu. 2016. Big data and data science: what should we teach?. Expert Systems 33:4, 364-373. [CrossRef]
21. Rong Tang, Watinee Sae-Lim. 2016. Data science programs in U.S. higher education: An exploratory content analysis of program
description, curriculum structure, and course focus. Education for Information 32:3, 269-290. [CrossRef]
22. Hao Peifeng, Cui Yuzhe, Song Jingping, Hu ZhaomuSmart wardrobe system based on Android platform 279-285. [CrossRef]

23. Alberto Fernández, Sara del Río, Abdullah Bawakid, Francisco Herrera. 2016. Fuzzy rule based classification systems for big data
with MapReduce: granularity analysis. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification . [CrossRef]
24. Jianwei Yin, Yan Tang, Wei Lo, Zhaohui WuFrom Big Data to Great Services 165-172. [CrossRef]
25. Carolina Lagos, Sebastian Gutierrez, Felisa Cordova, Guillermo Fuertes, Raul CarrascoData analysis methods related to energetic
consumption in copper mining — A Test case in Chile 244-249. [CrossRef]
26. Zhenning Xu, Gary L. Frankwick, Edward Ramirez. 2016. Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new
product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research 69:5, 1562-1566. [CrossRef]
27. Myongho Yi. 2016. A Study on the Curriculums of Data Science. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information
Science 27:1, 263-290. [CrossRef]
28. Thomas Hart, Lei Xie. 2016. Providing data science support for systems pharmacology and its implications to drug discovery.
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 11:3, 241-256. [CrossRef]
29. Meiyu Fan, Jian Sun, Bin Zhou, Min Chen. 2016. The Smart Health Initiative in China: The Case of Wuhan, Hubei Province.
Journal of Medical Systems 40:3. . [CrossRef]
30. 2016. A Project-Based Case Study of Data Science Education. Data Science Journal 15. . [CrossRef]
31. David M. Steinberg. 2016. Industrial statistics: The challenges and the research. Quality Engineering 28:1, 45-59. [CrossRef]
32. Kurt Stockinger, Thilo Stadelmann, Andreas RuckstuhlData Scientist als Beruf 59-81. [CrossRef]
33. Christos Alexakos, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Andreas Papalambrou, Thomas Amorgianiotis, George Raptis, Nikolaos
ZervosERMIS: Extracting Knowledge from Unstructured Big Data for Supporting Business Decision Making 611-622.
[CrossRef]
34. Yuriko Yano, Yukari ShirotaSVD and Text Mining Integrated Approach to Measure Effects of Disasters on Japanese Economics
20-29. [CrossRef]
35. Harald Foidl, Michael FeldererData Science Challenges to Improve Quality Assurance of Internet of Things Applications 707-726.
[CrossRef]
36. Tien-Chi Huang, Chieh Hsu, Zih-Jin Ciou. 2015. Systematic Methodology for Excavating Sleeping Beauty Publications and
Their Princes from Medical and Biological Engineering Studies. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 35:6, 749-758.
[CrossRef]
37. Pedro Quelhas Brito, Carlos Soares, Sérgio Almeida, Ana Monte, Michel Byvoet. 2015. Customer segmentation in a large database
of an online customized fashion business. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 36, 93-100. [CrossRef]
38. Hamid Afshari, Qingjin Peng. 2015. Modeling and quantifying uncertainty in the product design phase for effects of user
preference changes. Industrial Management Data Systems 115:9, 1637-1665. [CrossRef]
39. Banage T.G.S. Kumara, Incheon Paik, Jia Zhang, T.H.A.S. Siriweera, Koswatte R.C. KoswatteOntology-Based Workflow
Generation for Intelligent Big Data Analytics 495-502. [CrossRef]
40. Rameshwar Dubey, Angappa Gunasekaran. 2015. Education and training for successful career in Big Data and Business Analytics.
Industrial and Commercial Training 47:4, 174-181. [CrossRef]
41. Seth C. Lewis. 2015. Journalism In An Era Of Big Data. Digital Journalism 3:3, 321-330. [CrossRef]
42. Giulio Aliberti, Alessandro Colantonio, Roberto Di Pietro, Riccardo Mariani. 2015. EXPEDITE: EXPress closED ITemset
Enumeration. Expert Systems with Applications 42:8, 3933-3944. [CrossRef]
43. Li Kung, Hsiao-Fan WangA recommender system for the optimal combination of energy resources with cost-benefit analysis
1-10. [CrossRef]
44. Jussi Ronkainen, Antti Iivari. 2015. Designing a Data Management Pipeline for Pervasive Sensor Communication Systems.
Procedia Computer Science 56, 183-188. [CrossRef]
45. Yi Shen. 2015. Strategic planning for a data-driven, shared-access research enterprise: virginia tech research data assessment and
landscape study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52:1, 1-4. [CrossRef]
46. Stefan Debortoli, Oliver Müller, Jan vom Brocke. 2014. Comparing Business Intelligence and Big Data Skills. Business
Information Systems Engineering 6:5, 289-300. [CrossRef]
47. Stefan Debortoli, Oliver Müller, Jan vom Brocke. 2014. Vergleich von Kompetenzanforderungen an Business-Intelligence- und
Big-Data-Spezialisten. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 56:5, 315-328. [CrossRef]
48. A.H.M. Sarowar Sattar, Jiuyong Li, Jixue Liu, Raymond Heatherly, Bradley Malin. 2014. A probabilistic approach to mitigate
composition attacks on privacy in non-coordinated environments. Knowledge-Based Systems 67, 361-372. [CrossRef]

49. Alberto Fernández, Sara del Río, Victoria López, Abdullah Bawakid, María J. del Jesus, José M. Benítez, Francisco Herrera. 2014.
Big Data with Cloud Computing: an insight on the computing environment, MapReduce, and programming frameworks. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 4:5, 380-409. [CrossRef]
50. Provost Foster. 2014. ACM SIGKDD 2014 to be Held August 24–27 in Manhattan. Big Data 2:2, 71-72. [Citation] [Full Text
HTML] [Full Text PDF] [Full Text PDF with Links]
51. Prasanna Tambe. 2014. Big Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value. Management Science 60:6, 1452-1469. [CrossRef]
52. Jay Lee, Hung-An Kao, Shanhu Yang. 2014. Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment.
Procedia CIRP 16, 3-8. [CrossRef]
53. Matthew A. Waller, Stanley E. Fawcett. 2013. Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution That Will
Transform Supply Chain Design and Management. Journal of Business Logistics 34:2, 77-84. [CrossRef]
54. Zhecheng Zhu, Heng Bee Hoon, Kiok-Liang TeowInteractive Data Visualization Techniques Applied to Healthcare Decision
Making 46-59. [CrossRef]
55. Siddhartha DuggiralaBig Data Architecture: 315-344. [CrossRef]
56. Saurabh BrajeshBig Data Analytics in Retail Supply Chain 1473-1494. [CrossRef]
57. Xiuli He, Satyajit Saravane, Qiannong GuSupply Chain Analytics 2364-2375. [CrossRef]
58. Saurabh BrajeshBig Data Analytics in Retail Supply Chain 269-289. [CrossRef]
59. Zhecheng Zhu, Heng Bee Hoon, Kiok-Liang TeowInteractive Data Visualization Techniques Applied to Healthcare Decision
Making 1157-1171. [CrossRef]

Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making (20)

More from Dr. Volkan OBAN (14)

Recently uploaded (20)

Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making