Help to other students on research paper on Deadlock- System model, resource types, deadlock problem, deadlock characterization, methods for deadlock handling,
The document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It begins by providing examples of deadlock situations and defining the four conditions required for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. It then describes methods for handling deadlocks, including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. For prevention and avoidance, it discusses specific algorithms like the banking algorithm and using a resource allocation graph to model processes and resources. The document provides examples and diagrams to illustrate deadlock states and these algorithms.
This document discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It begins by defining a deadlock as a state where a set of blocked processes are each holding resources and waiting for resources held by others in a cyclic manner. It then presents methods for handling deadlocks, including prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. For avoidance, it describes using a resource allocation graph to model processes and resources, and the banker's algorithm to ensure the system is always in a safe state where deadlocks cannot occur.
The document discusses deadlocks in computer systems and various approaches to handling them. It defines deadlock as when a set of processes are blocked waiting for resources held by each other in a cyclic manner. There are four conditions required for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Methods to handle deadlocks include ignoring the problem, preventing deadlocks through design restrictions, avoiding deadlocks by dynamically checking for safety, and detecting and recovering from deadlocks after the fact. The banker's algorithm is presented as an avoidance technique using a resource allocation graph and safety checks.
The document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlocks as a situation where a set of concurrent processes are prevented from completing tasks due to circular resource dependencies. The document outlines four conditions required for deadlock and presents methods for handling deadlocks, including prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It provides examples using resource allocation graphs and the banker's algorithm to model processes and resources to ensure the system remains in a safe state to avoid deadlocks.
A document about deadlocks in operating systems is summarized as follows:
1. A deadlock occurs when a set of processes form a circular chain where each process is waiting for a resource held by the next process in the chain. The four conditions for deadlock are mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait.
2. Deadlocks can be modeled using a resource allocation graph where processes and resources are vertices and edges represent resource requests. A cycle in the graph indicates a potential deadlock.
3. Methods for handling deadlocks include prevention, avoidance, and detection/recovery. Prevention ensures deadlock conditions cannot occur while avoidance allows the system to dynamically verify new allocations will not
The document summarizes different approaches to handling deadlocks in operating systems, including prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the four conditions required for deadlock, and models for representing resource allocation and processes waiting for resources, such as resource allocation graphs and wait-for graphs. Detection algorithms allow the system to enter a deadlocked state and then identify cycles in wait-for graphs to detect deadlocks.
This document summarizes key concepts related to deadlock avoidance in operating systems. It discusses the four conditions for deadlock, describes the concept of a safe state for resource allocation, and provides an example of modeling resource allocation using a resource allocation graph. The document is presented as part of a course on operating systems, covering topics such as deadlock avoidance, safe state determination, and modeling resource allocation through graphs.
The Deadlock Problem
System Model
Deadlock Characterization
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
Deadlock Prevention
Deadlock Avoidance
Deadlock Detection
Recovery from Deadlock
The document discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It defines deadlock, presents examples, and describes four conditions required for deadlock to occur. Several methods for handling deadlocks are discussed, including prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. Prevention methods aim to ensure deadlocks never occur, while avoidance allows the system to dynamically prevent unsafe states. Detection identifies when the system is in a deadlocked state.
The implementation of Banker's algorithm, data structure and its parserMatthew Chang
The document summarizes a student project presentation on implementing Banker's algorithm for deadlock avoidance. It includes:
1) An overview of Banker's algorithm and how it checks for safe states to avoid deadlock by dynamically evaluating resource requests.
2) Details on the data structures and parsing approach used to represent the banker's algorithm information and process resource requests.
3) A demonstration of the program loading sample data from a file, displaying the banker's algorithm information, and handling different user commands and error scenarios.
This document discusses operating system topics related to deadlocks, including definitions, properties, prevention, detection, and recovery from deadlocks. It defines deadlock as when a process requests resources that are held by another waiting process, creating a circular wait. Four conditions must be met for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Techniques to prevent deadlocks include deadlock avoidance using safe states and resource allocation graphs, and deadlock prevention by ensuring one of the four conditions is never satisfied. Deadlock detection uses wait-for graphs or detection algorithms, and recovery options are terminating processes or preempting resources.
Deadlock Detection in Distributed SystemsDHIVYADEVAKI
The document discusses deadlocks in computing systems. It defines deadlocks and related concepts like livelock and starvation. It presents various approaches to deal with deadlocks including detection and recovery, avoidance through runtime checks, and prevention by restricting resource requests. Graph-based algorithms are described for detecting and preventing deadlocks by analyzing resource allocation graphs. The Banker's algorithm is introduced as a static prevention method. Finally, it discusses ways to eliminate the conditions required for deadlocks, like mutual exclusion, hold-and-wait, and circular wait.
Deadlocks occur when a set of blocked processes each hold resources and wait for resources held by other processes in the set, resulting in a circular wait. The four necessary conditions for deadlock are: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The banker's algorithm is a deadlock avoidance technique that requires processes to declare maximum resource needs upfront. It ensures the system is always in a safe state by delaying resource requests that could lead to an unsafe state where deadlock is possible.
The document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlock as when a process waits for a resource held by another waiting process, forming a circular chain of processes waiting for each other. It characterizes deadlock by the conditions of mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The document outlines strategies to handle deadlocks through prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. It describes resource allocation graphs to model deadlocks and the conditions for deadlocks using AND and OR resource allocation. Finally, it discusses different techniques for deadlock prevention, detection, and recovery in a system.
The document discusses different methods for handling deadlocks in a system. It describes deadlock characterization including the necessary conditions for deadlock, using a resource-allocation graph to model deadlocks, and examples of such graphs. It also explains several methods for handling deadlocks including deadlock prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. Deadlock prevention methods aim to enforce constraints to ensure the necessary conditions for deadlock cannot occur. Deadlock avoidance uses additional information to dynamically monitor the system state and ensure it remains in a safe state where deadlocks cannot happen.
This document discusses various approaches to handling deadlocks in operating systems, including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the four necessary conditions for deadlock, and models the problem using resource allocation graphs. Prevention methods aim to enforce constraints to ensure deadlock cannot occur, while avoidance algorithms dynamically monitor the system state to guarantee safety. Detection algorithms periodically search allocation graphs or wait-for graphs to find cycles indicating deadlock. Recovery requires rolling back processes to free locked resources.
This document describes a course on operating systems with a focus on deadlocks and memory management. It discusses deadlocks in depth, including the necessary conditions for deadlocks, methods for handling them through prevention, avoidance, detection and recovery. For deadlock prevention, it describes how to ensure the hold-and-wait, no preemption and circular wait conditions do not occur. Deadlock avoidance requires knowledge of future resource requests to determine if a process must wait. The document also provides an overview of memory management strategies like swapping, contiguous allocation and paging.
This document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlock as when a set of blocked processes each hold a resource and wait for a resource held by another process. It then covers methods for handling deadlocks such as prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. Prevention ensures deadlock conditions cannot occur. Avoidance allows the system to deny requests that could lead to deadlock. Detection identifies when a deadlock has occurred. Recovery breaks deadlocks by terminating or preempting processes.
The document discusses deadlock in computer systems. It defines deadlock and lists necessary conditions for deadlock including mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. It also discusses strategies for dealing with deadlock such as detection, recovery, and prevention/avoidance. The resource allocation graph (RAG) model is introduced as a way to represent system states and detect deadlock. Algorithms like Banker's algorithm aim to avoid deadlock by ensuring safe allocation of resources.
This chapter discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It defines deadlock as a situation where a set of blocked processes are each holding resources and waiting for additional resources held by other processes in the set, resulting in a circular wait. The chapter presents methods for handling deadlocks including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the basic conditions for deadlock and models like the resource allocation graph used to analyze deadlock states. Banker's algorithm is provided as an example of a deadlock avoidance strategy.
Deadlocks occur when processes are waiting for resources held by other processes, resulting in a circular wait. Four conditions must be met: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Deadlocks can be handled through avoidance, prevention, or detection and recovery. Avoidance algorithms allocate resources only if it ensures the system remains in a safe state where deadlocks cannot occur. Prevention methods make deadlocks impossible by ensuring at least one condition is never satisfied, such as through collective or ordered resource requests. Detection finds existing deadlocks by analyzing resource allocation graphs or wait-for graphs to detect cycles.
Deadlock and memory management -- Operating SystemEktaVaswani2
This document discusses operating system resources, deadlocks, and memory management. It defines system resources as any usable parts of a computer that can be controlled and assigned by the operating system. It describes the four conditions required for a deadlock and methods for detecting, avoiding, and recovering from deadlocks such as terminating processes. It also discusses memory management techniques like paging, swapping, and virtual memory that allow more programs to reside in memory than the physical memory size.
Deadlock occurs when a set of blocked processes form a circular chain where each process waits for a resource held by the next process. There are four necessary conditions for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The banker's algorithm avoids deadlock by tracking available resources and process resource needs, and only allocating resources to a process if it will not cause the system to enter an unsafe state where deadlock could occur. It uses matrices to represent allocation states and evaluates requests to ensure allocating resources does not lead to deadlock.
This document discusses deadlocks and techniques for handling them. It begins by defining the four necessary conditions for a deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. It then describes three approaches to handling deadlocks: prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. Prevention aims to ensure one of the four conditions never holds. Avoidance uses more information to determine if a request could lead to a deadlock. Detection and recovery allows deadlocks but detects and recovers from them after the fact. The document provides examples of different prevention techniques like limiting resource types that can be held, ordering resource types, and preemption. It also explains the banker's algorithm for deadlock avoidance.
This document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. A deadlock occurs when a set of processes are blocked waiting for resources held by each other in a cyclic manner. Four conditions must be met for a deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The document outlines strategies for detecting and avoiding deadlocks such as deadlock detection algorithms, safe state models like the Banker's Algorithm, and techniques for preventing the four deadlock conditions.
This document discusses deadlock avoidance techniques. It explains the concepts of safe and unsafe states when allocating resources to processes. The resource allocation graph algorithm uses claim and assignment edges to model potential resource requests. Banker's algorithm requires processes to declare maximum resource needs upfront. It uses an allocation matrix and need matrix to determine if allocating resources to a process will result in an unsafe state. An example demonstrates tracking available resources and determining if processes can safely obtain requested resources without causing deadlock.
The document discusses process synchronization and deadlocks. It introduces race conditions, critical sections, and solutions to synchronize processes like semaphores. Classical problems like the dining philosophers problem and bridge crossing example are presented. Deadlocks are characterized by conditions like mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption and circular wait. Methods to handle deadlocks include prevention through ordering of resource requests and avoidance using resource allocation states.
The Deadlock Problem
System Model
Deadlock Characterization
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
Deadlock Prevention
Deadlock Avoidance
Deadlock Detection
Recovery from Deadlock
The document discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It defines deadlock, presents examples, and describes four conditions required for deadlock to occur. Several methods for handling deadlocks are discussed, including prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. Prevention methods aim to ensure deadlocks never occur, while avoidance allows the system to dynamically prevent unsafe states. Detection identifies when the system is in a deadlocked state.
The implementation of Banker's algorithm, data structure and its parserMatthew Chang
The document summarizes a student project presentation on implementing Banker's algorithm for deadlock avoidance. It includes:
1) An overview of Banker's algorithm and how it checks for safe states to avoid deadlock by dynamically evaluating resource requests.
2) Details on the data structures and parsing approach used to represent the banker's algorithm information and process resource requests.
3) A demonstration of the program loading sample data from a file, displaying the banker's algorithm information, and handling different user commands and error scenarios.
This document discusses operating system topics related to deadlocks, including definitions, properties, prevention, detection, and recovery from deadlocks. It defines deadlock as when a process requests resources that are held by another waiting process, creating a circular wait. Four conditions must be met for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Techniques to prevent deadlocks include deadlock avoidance using safe states and resource allocation graphs, and deadlock prevention by ensuring one of the four conditions is never satisfied. Deadlock detection uses wait-for graphs or detection algorithms, and recovery options are terminating processes or preempting resources.
Deadlock Detection in Distributed SystemsDHIVYADEVAKI
The document discusses deadlocks in computing systems. It defines deadlocks and related concepts like livelock and starvation. It presents various approaches to deal with deadlocks including detection and recovery, avoidance through runtime checks, and prevention by restricting resource requests. Graph-based algorithms are described for detecting and preventing deadlocks by analyzing resource allocation graphs. The Banker's algorithm is introduced as a static prevention method. Finally, it discusses ways to eliminate the conditions required for deadlocks, like mutual exclusion, hold-and-wait, and circular wait.
Deadlocks occur when a set of blocked processes each hold resources and wait for resources held by other processes in the set, resulting in a circular wait. The four necessary conditions for deadlock are: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The banker's algorithm is a deadlock avoidance technique that requires processes to declare maximum resource needs upfront. It ensures the system is always in a safe state by delaying resource requests that could lead to an unsafe state where deadlock is possible.
The document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlock as when a process waits for a resource held by another waiting process, forming a circular chain of processes waiting for each other. It characterizes deadlock by the conditions of mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The document outlines strategies to handle deadlocks through prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. It describes resource allocation graphs to model deadlocks and the conditions for deadlocks using AND and OR resource allocation. Finally, it discusses different techniques for deadlock prevention, detection, and recovery in a system.
The document discusses different methods for handling deadlocks in a system. It describes deadlock characterization including the necessary conditions for deadlock, using a resource-allocation graph to model deadlocks, and examples of such graphs. It also explains several methods for handling deadlocks including deadlock prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. Deadlock prevention methods aim to enforce constraints to ensure the necessary conditions for deadlock cannot occur. Deadlock avoidance uses additional information to dynamically monitor the system state and ensure it remains in a safe state where deadlocks cannot happen.
This document discusses various approaches to handling deadlocks in operating systems, including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the four necessary conditions for deadlock, and models the problem using resource allocation graphs. Prevention methods aim to enforce constraints to ensure deadlock cannot occur, while avoidance algorithms dynamically monitor the system state to guarantee safety. Detection algorithms periodically search allocation graphs or wait-for graphs to find cycles indicating deadlock. Recovery requires rolling back processes to free locked resources.
This document describes a course on operating systems with a focus on deadlocks and memory management. It discusses deadlocks in depth, including the necessary conditions for deadlocks, methods for handling them through prevention, avoidance, detection and recovery. For deadlock prevention, it describes how to ensure the hold-and-wait, no preemption and circular wait conditions do not occur. Deadlock avoidance requires knowledge of future resource requests to determine if a process must wait. The document also provides an overview of memory management strategies like swapping, contiguous allocation and paging.
This document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlock as when a set of blocked processes each hold a resource and wait for a resource held by another process. It then covers methods for handling deadlocks such as prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. Prevention ensures deadlock conditions cannot occur. Avoidance allows the system to deny requests that could lead to deadlock. Detection identifies when a deadlock has occurred. Recovery breaks deadlocks by terminating or preempting processes.
The document discusses deadlock in computer systems. It defines deadlock and lists necessary conditions for deadlock including mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. It also discusses strategies for dealing with deadlock such as detection, recovery, and prevention/avoidance. The resource allocation graph (RAG) model is introduced as a way to represent system states and detect deadlock. Algorithms like Banker's algorithm aim to avoid deadlock by ensuring safe allocation of resources.
This chapter discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It defines deadlock as a situation where a set of blocked processes are each holding resources and waiting for additional resources held by other processes in the set, resulting in a circular wait. The chapter presents methods for handling deadlocks including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the basic conditions for deadlock and models like the resource allocation graph used to analyze deadlock states. Banker's algorithm is provided as an example of a deadlock avoidance strategy.
Deadlocks occur when processes are waiting for resources held by other processes, resulting in a circular wait. Four conditions must be met: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Deadlocks can be handled through avoidance, prevention, or detection and recovery. Avoidance algorithms allocate resources only if it ensures the system remains in a safe state where deadlocks cannot occur. Prevention methods make deadlocks impossible by ensuring at least one condition is never satisfied, such as through collective or ordered resource requests. Detection finds existing deadlocks by analyzing resource allocation graphs or wait-for graphs to detect cycles.
Deadlock and memory management -- Operating SystemEktaVaswani2
This document discusses operating system resources, deadlocks, and memory management. It defines system resources as any usable parts of a computer that can be controlled and assigned by the operating system. It describes the four conditions required for a deadlock and methods for detecting, avoiding, and recovering from deadlocks such as terminating processes. It also discusses memory management techniques like paging, swapping, and virtual memory that allow more programs to reside in memory than the physical memory size.
Deadlock occurs when a set of blocked processes form a circular chain where each process waits for a resource held by the next process. There are four necessary conditions for deadlock: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The banker's algorithm avoids deadlock by tracking available resources and process resource needs, and only allocating resources to a process if it will not cause the system to enter an unsafe state where deadlock could occur. It uses matrices to represent allocation states and evaluates requests to ensure allocating resources does not lead to deadlock.
This document discusses deadlocks and techniques for handling them. It begins by defining the four necessary conditions for a deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. It then describes three approaches to handling deadlocks: prevention, avoidance, and detection and recovery. Prevention aims to ensure one of the four conditions never holds. Avoidance uses more information to determine if a request could lead to a deadlock. Detection and recovery allows deadlocks but detects and recovers from them after the fact. The document provides examples of different prevention techniques like limiting resource types that can be held, ordering resource types, and preemption. It also explains the banker's algorithm for deadlock avoidance.
This document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. A deadlock occurs when a set of processes are blocked waiting for resources held by each other in a cyclic manner. Four conditions must be met for a deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. The document outlines strategies for detecting and avoiding deadlocks such as deadlock detection algorithms, safe state models like the Banker's Algorithm, and techniques for preventing the four deadlock conditions.
This document discusses deadlock avoidance techniques. It explains the concepts of safe and unsafe states when allocating resources to processes. The resource allocation graph algorithm uses claim and assignment edges to model potential resource requests. Banker's algorithm requires processes to declare maximum resource needs upfront. It uses an allocation matrix and need matrix to determine if allocating resources to a process will result in an unsafe state. An example demonstrates tracking available resources and determining if processes can safely obtain requested resources without causing deadlock.
The document discusses process synchronization and deadlocks. It introduces race conditions, critical sections, and solutions to synchronize processes like semaphores. Classical problems like the dining philosophers problem and bridge crossing example are presented. Deadlocks are characterized by conditions like mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption and circular wait. Methods to handle deadlocks include prevention through ordering of resource requests and avoidance using resource allocation states.
Deadlock occurs in a system when multiple processes are waiting indefinitely for resources held by other waiting processes, resulting in no progress. The four conditions required for deadlock are mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Deadlock can be avoided by ensuring that at least one of these conditions does not occur through methods like deadlock prevention, deadlock avoidance using safe sequences, and the banker's algorithm.
A deadlock occurs when a set of processes are blocked because each process is holding a resource and waiting for another resource held by another process in the set, creating a circular wait. Four necessary conditions must be met for a deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Deadlocks can be handled through deadlock avoidance, detection and recovery, or prevention. Avoidance methods like Banker's Algorithm use safe state models to prevent deadlocks, while detection algorithms use resource allocation graphs to detect deadlocks. Once detected, deadlocks are recovered through process termination or resource preemption.
This document discusses various techniques for handling deadlocks in operating systems, including prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. Deadlock prevention methods ensure deadlock conditions cannot occur by restricting resource usage. Deadlock avoidance algorithms dynamically examine the resource allocation state to guarantee the system remains in a safe state. Detection algorithms search for resource allocation cycles to identify deadlocks. Recovery methods terminate or roll back processes involved in deadlocks. The document provides examples to illustrate these deadlock handling techniques.
Process synchronization ensures systematic sharing of resources among concurrent processes. A race condition occurs when two processes access and modify shared resources without coordination. In a printer spooler example, two processes modify shared variables that point to files to print and available slots, which could result in files being skipped or printed multiple times. The critical section is the part of the program where shared memory is accessed; avoiding race conditions requires no two processes to be in their critical section simultaneously. Deadlocks occur when a set of processes are blocked waiting for resources held by other processes in the set, forming a circular wait. Methods to handle deadlocks include prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery.
This document discusses deadlocks in operating systems. It defines deadlock as when a set of processes are all waiting for resources held by each other in a cyclic manner, preventing any progress. Four conditions must hold for deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Detection methods include using a resource allocation graph to model processes and resources. Prevention techniques enforce restrictions like requiring processes request resources in a predefined order to avoid circular waits. The banker's algorithm is also described, which uses matrices to model available resources and ensure the system remains in a safe state to avoid deadlocks.
The document summarizes key topics about deadlocks in operating systems including deadlock characterization, prevention, and avoidance. It defines deadlock as a set of blocked processes where each process is waiting for a resource held by another in the set. Four conditions must be met for deadlock to occur: mutual exclusion, hold and wait, no preemption, and circular wait. Deadlock prevention methods ensure systems never enter a deadlock state while avoidance uses a safe state algorithm and resource ordering to dynamically prevent unsafe states.
This document discusses deadlocks in computer systems. It defines the four necessary conditions for deadlock and introduces resource allocation graphs to model deadlock states. It describes three main approaches to handling deadlocks: prevention, detection and recovery, and ignoring the problem. The rest of the document focuses on techniques for deadlock prevention, including holding and waiting, no preemption, and circular wait conditions. It also covers deadlock avoidance using safe state models, resource allocation graphs, and Banker's algorithm to determine if a resource request would result in an unsafe state.
Useful documents for engineering students of CSE, and specially for students of aryabhatta knowledge university, Bihar (A.K.U. Bihar). It covers following topics: System model deadlock characterization, methods for handling deadlocks, deadlock prevention,
deadlock avoidance, deadlock detection, recovery from deadlock
1. There are three methods to handle deadlocks: prevention, avoidance, and detection with recovery.
2. Deadlock prevention ensures that at least one of the necessary conditions for deadlock cannot occur. Deadlock avoidance requires processes to declare maximum resource needs upfront.
3. The Banker's algorithm is a deadlock avoidance technique that dynamically checks the resource allocation state to ensure it remains safe and no circular wait can occur.
Get a piece of basic knowledge about deadlock and what it is. What are the measures., conditions, and more. Also, know about Banker's algorithm and how does the calculation work.
The document discusses different methods for handling deadlocks in computer systems, including deadlock prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. It describes the four necessary conditions for deadlock, and models like the resource allocation graph and banker's algorithm that can be used to prevent or avoid deadlocks by ensuring the system remains in a safe state where deadlocks cannot occur. Detection methods allow the system to enter a deadlocked state before taking action to recover through rollback or preemption.
Deadlock in software engineering for beginners.pptshantomajumdar
In the realm of computing, particularly within operating systems, the concept of a *deadlock* represents a critical challenge that can significantly hinder system performance and reliability. A deadlock arises when a set of processes become entangled in a state where each process is waiting for a resource that another process holds, leading to a standstill where none can proceed. This situation is analogous to a traffic gridlock at an intersection where each vehicle waits for another to move, but none can advance because they are all waiting on each other.
Understanding deadlocks is paramount for system developers, administrators, and users to ensure the smooth operation of computing systems. This comprehensive analysis delves into the intricacies of deadlocks, exploring their causes, necessary conditions, detection methods, prevention strategies, and approaches for resolution.
**1. Understanding Deadlocks**
At its core, a deadlock is a situation in computing where two or more processes are unable to proceed because each is waiting for the other to release a resource. This mutual waiting leads to a cycle of dependencies that halts the progress of all involved processes. Deadlocks are particularly prevalent in systems where multiple processes run concurrently and share resources such as memory, files, or peripheral devices.
**2. Necessary Conditions for Deadlock**
For a deadlock to occur, four specific conditions, known as the Coffman conditions, must simultaneously hold true:
1. **Mutual Exclusion**: At least one resource is held in a non-shareable mode, meaning only one process can use the resource at any given time. If another process requests this resource, it must wait until the resource is released.
2. **Hold and Wait**: A process is currently holding at least one resource and is waiting to acquire additional resources that are currently being held by other processes.
3. **No Preemption**: Resources cannot be forcibly removed from the processes holding them; they must be released voluntarily by the holding process.
4. **Circular Wait**: A set of processes are waiting for each other in a circular chain, where each process holds a resource that the next process in the chain requires.
These conditions create a cycle of dependencies that, once formed, lead to a deadlock situation.
**3. Resource Allocation and Deadlock Modeling**
In operating systems, resources can be categorized into different types, such as CPU cycles, memory space, and I/O devices. The allocation of these resources can be visualized using Resource Allocation Graphs (RAGs), where nodes represent processes and resources, and edges represent the allocation and request of resources. A cycle in this graph indicates the potential for a deadlock.
**4. Deadlock Detection**
Detecting deadlocks involves monitoring resource allocation and process states to identify cycles in the system's resource
An MCQ Android app was submitted by Mr. Wakil Kumar, a 3rd year Computer Science and Engineering student at Career Point University in Kota, India, as part of a science exhibition for the Computer Science department. The app allows users to answer multiple choice questions on Android devices.
How to create .exe file into .c file in C Language anyone Program (Marksheet ...Wakil Kumar
This document provides instructions for creating an .exe file from a .c file using CodeBlocks on Windows. It involves:
1. Installing CodeBlocks software and noting the mingw compiler location (typically in the CodeBlocks/mingw/bin folder).
2. Adding this compiler location to the system PATH environment variable so it can be accessed from the command prompt.
3. Creating a simple .c file on the Desktop containing code, then using command prompt commands like cd to navigate to the Desktop folder and compile the .c file into an .exe using the mingw compiler.
The document discusses the process of normalization to organize a relational database and reduce data redundancy. It uses a sample dataset on shipments to demonstrate the three normal forms - first normal form ensures each attribute contains a single value, second normal form splits attributes that do not depend on the full primary key, and third normal form makes all non-key attributes independent of each other. The normalization process transforms the sample shipment data through each normal form to arrive at a less redundant and more logically organized database structure.
The document proposes developing an electronic bus ticketing system using near-field communication (NFC) between NFC-enabled devices to identify and ticket passengers on the bus. The current manual ticketing system is time-consuming and prone to issues like incorrect change. The proposed system would allow administrators and conductors to login and manage user accounts through a web interface. It would use NFC taps between passengers' cards and a conductor's mobile phone to detect passenger IDs, calculate fares based on routes, and deduct fares from stored balances. The system is specified to use NFC tags, Android mobiles, SQL Server database, and SDK for implementation.
Miniature Circuit Breakers (MCB) By Chhotray TiyuWakil Kumar
(1) Miniature Circuit Breakers (MCBs) are devices that protect electrical circuits from overloads and short circuits. They contain a switch and trip unit that can open and close a circuit under rated current. (2) MCBs have standardized modular dimensions and fit into distribution boards. They use a bimetal strip to detect overloads and a magnetic trip to detect short circuits. (3) The tripping characteristics of MCBs can be selected using different curves (B, C, D, etc.) to provide appropriate protection for different circuit types like transformers or motors.
The document discusses using a stepdown transformer to run a DC motor. It explains that a transformer changes AC voltage from one level to another through magnetic induction without changing frequency. A stepdown transformer is used to reduce voltage from the mains to a level suitable for a DC motor. It then describes the basic components and construction of transformers, including the core and winding types. The document also covers transformer theory, including Faraday's law, Lenz's law, and the ideal transformer equation relating primary and secondary voltage and current. It defines transformer ratings in terms of apparent power.
This document discusses functions and their applications. It begins with an introduction that defines a function as a rule that maps an input number to a unique output number. It then provides examples of functions. It discusses applications of functions in real world contexts like tracking location over time. It also discusses applications in computer science and software engineering. Finally, it concludes that polynomials are an important topic in mathematics and provides references and websites for further information.
The document summarizes key concepts related to line balancing problems in manufacturing. It defines terms like minimum work element, total work content, workstation process time, cycle time, and precedence constraints that are important to consider when balancing a production line. It also describes the largest candidate rule method for assigning work elements to stations in a way that aims to balance station times and meet production rate requirements while respecting precedence constraints.
RLC series circuit simulation at Proteus Wakil KumarWakil Kumar
This document summarizes a simulation of an RLC circuit using Proteus software. It introduces RLC circuits and describes how to build one in Proteus using a resistor, capacitor, inductor, and AC voltage source connected in series. The voltages across each component are then calculated and waveforms observed through analog analysis. RLC circuits are commonly used in AM/FM radios, oscillators, and pulse discharge circuits.
RLC series circuit simulation at Proteus Wakil Kumar
This document summarizes a simulation of an RLC circuit using Proteus software. It introduces RLC circuits and describes how to build one in Proteus using a resistor, capacitor, inductor, and AC voltage source connected in series. The voltages across each component are then calculated and waveforms observed through analog analysis. RLC circuits are commonly used in AM/FM radios, oscillators, and pulse discharge circuits.
In tube drawing process, a tube is pulled out through a die and a plug to reduce its diameter and thickness as per the requirement. Dimensional accuracy of cold drawn tubes plays a vital role in the further quality of end products and controlling rejection in manufacturing processes of these end products. Springback phenomenon is the elastic strain recovery after removal of forming loads, causes geometrical inaccuracies in drawn tubes. Further, this leads to difficulty in achieving close dimensional tolerances. In the present work springback of EN 8 D tube material is studied for various cold drawing parameters. The process parameters in this work include die semi-angle, land width and drawing speed. The experimentation is done using Taguchi’s L36 orthogonal array, and then optimization is done in data analysis software Minitab 17. The results of ANOVA shows that 15 degrees die semi-angle,5 mm land width and 6 m/min drawing speed yields least springback. Furthermore, optimization algorithms named Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) are applied which shows that 15 degrees die semi-angle, 10 mm land width and 8 m/min drawing speed results in minimal springback with almost 10.5 % improvement. Finally, the results of experimentation are validated with Finite Element Analysis technique using ANSYS.
its all about Artificial Intelligence(Ai) and Machine Learning and not on advanced level you can study before the exam or can check for some information on Ai for project
Value Stream Mapping Worskshops for Intelligent Continuous SecurityMarc Hornbeek
This presentation provides detailed guidance and tools for conducting Current State and Future State Value Stream Mapping workshops for Intelligent Continuous Security.
ELectronics Boards & Product Testing_Shiju.pdfShiju Jacob
This presentation provides a high level insight about DFT analysis and test coverage calculation, finalizing test strategy, and types of tests at different levels of the product.
Passenger car unit (PCU) of a vehicle type depends on vehicular characteristics, stream characteristics, roadway characteristics, environmental factors, climate conditions and control conditions. Keeping in view various factors affecting PCU, a model was developed taking a volume to capacity ratio and percentage share of particular vehicle type as independent parameters. A microscopic traffic simulation model VISSIM has been used in present study for generating traffic flow data which some time very difficult to obtain from field survey. A comparison study was carried out with the purpose of verifying when the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models are appropriate for prediction of PCUs of different vehicle types. From the results observed that ANFIS model estimates were closer to the corresponding simulated PCU values compared to MLR and ANN models. It is concluded that the ANFIS model showed greater potential in predicting PCUs from v/c ratio and proportional share for all type of vehicles whereas MLR and ANN models did not perform well.
"Feed Water Heaters in Thermal Power Plants: Types, Working, and Efficiency G...Infopitaara
A feed water heater is a device used in power plants to preheat water before it enters the boiler. It plays a critical role in improving the overall efficiency of the power generation process, especially in thermal power plants.
🔧 Function of a Feed Water Heater:
It uses steam extracted from the turbine to preheat the feed water.
This reduces the fuel required to convert water into steam in the boiler.
It supports Regenerative Rankine Cycle, increasing plant efficiency.
🔍 Types of Feed Water Heaters:
Open Feed Water Heater (Direct Contact)
Steam and water come into direct contact.
Mixing occurs, and heat is transferred directly.
Common in low-pressure stages.
Closed Feed Water Heater (Surface Type)
Steam and water are separated by tubes.
Heat is transferred through tube walls.
Common in high-pressure systems.
⚙️ Advantages:
Improves thermal efficiency.
Reduces fuel consumption.
Lowers thermal stress on boiler components.
Minimizes corrosion by removing dissolved gases.
Analysis of reinforced concrete deep beam is based on simplified approximate method due to the complexity of the exact analysis. The complexity is due to a number of parameters affecting its response. To evaluate some of this parameters, finite element study of the structural behavior of the reinforced self-compacting concrete deep beam was carried out using Abaqus finite element modeling tool. The model was validated against experimental data from the literature. The parametric effects of varied concrete compressive strength, vertical web reinforcement ratio and horizontal web reinforcement ratio on the beam were tested on eight (8) different specimens under four points loads. The results of the validation work showed good agreement with the experimental studies. The parametric study revealed that the concrete compressive strength most significantly influenced the specimens’ response with the average of 41.1% and 49 % increment in the diagonal cracking and ultimate load respectively due to doubling of concrete compressive strength. Although the increase in horizontal web reinforcement ratio from 0.31 % to 0.63 % lead to average of 6.24 % increment on the diagonal cracking load, it does not influence the ultimate strength and the load-deflection response of the beams. Similar variation in vertical web reinforcement ratio leads to an average of 2.4 % and 15 % increment in cracking and ultimate load respectively with no appreciable effect on the load-deflection response.
Raish Khanji GTU 8th sem Internship Report.pdfRaishKhanji
This report details the practical experiences gained during an internship at Indo German Tool
Room, Ahmedabad. The internship provided hands-on training in various manufacturing technologies, encompassing both conventional and advanced techniques. Significant emphasis was placed on machining processes, including operation and fundamental
understanding of lathe and milling machines. Furthermore, the internship incorporated
modern welding technology, notably through the application of an Augmented Reality (AR)
simulator, offering a safe and effective environment for skill development. Exposure to
industrial automation was achieved through practical exercises in Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) using Siemens TIA software and direct operation of industrial robots
utilizing teach pendants. The principles and practical aspects of Computer Numerical Control
(CNC) technology were also explored. Complementing these manufacturing processes, the
internship included extensive application of SolidWorks software for design and modeling tasks. This comprehensive practical training has provided a foundational understanding of
key aspects of modern manufacturing and design, enhancing the technical proficiency and readiness for future engineering endeavors.
"Boiler Feed Pump (BFP): Working, Applications, Advantages, and Limitations E...Infopitaara
A Boiler Feed Pump (BFP) is a critical component in thermal power plants. It supplies high-pressure water (feedwater) to the boiler, ensuring continuous steam generation.
⚙️ How a Boiler Feed Pump Works
Water Collection:
Feedwater is collected from the deaerator or feedwater tank.
Pressurization:
The pump increases water pressure using multiple impellers/stages in centrifugal types.
Discharge to Boiler:
Pressurized water is then supplied to the boiler drum or economizer section, depending on design.
🌀 Types of Boiler Feed Pumps
Centrifugal Pumps (most common):
Multistage for higher pressure.
Used in large thermal power stations.
Positive Displacement Pumps (less common):
For smaller or specific applications.
Precise flow control but less efficient for large volumes.
🛠️ Key Operations and Controls
Recirculation Line: Protects the pump from overheating at low flow.
Throttle Valve: Regulates flow based on boiler demand.
Control System: Often automated via DCS/PLC for variable load conditions.
Sealing & Cooling Systems: Prevent leakage and maintain pump health.
⚠️ Common BFP Issues
Cavitation due to low NPSH (Net Positive Suction Head).
Seal or bearing failure.
Overheating from improper flow or recirculation.
Mathematical foundation machine learning.pdfTalhaShahid49
Deadlock- System model, resource types, deadlock problem, deadlock characterization, methods for deadlock handling Research paper
1. Career Point University
REPORT ON
Deadlock- System model, resource types, deadlock problem, deadlock
characterization, methods for deadlock handling
SUBMITTED TO : SUBMITTED BY :
SOURAVH SHARMA WAKIL KUMAR
ASST. PROFESSOR UID-K12467
CSE DEPT. B.TECH (CSE)
4TH
SEMESTER
2. Deadlock- System model, resource types, deadlock problem,
deadlock characterization, methods for deadlock handling
Mr. Wakil Kumar
B.Tech CSE 4th
sem CareerPoint
University, Kota (Raj.)
[email protected]
Guided by
Mr. Sourabh Sharma
Asst. Professor,Computer science Department
Career Point University, Kota (Raj.)
[email protected]
Abstract— Deadlock can occur wherever multiple
processes interact. System deadlock is a serious problem in a
multiprogramming environment.
Keywords—Deadlock, prevention, recovery, detection,
avoidance.
Introduction
A deadlock is a state where a set of processes request
resources that are held by other processes in the set. A
deadlock is a condition in a system where a process cannot
proceed because it needs to obtain a resource held by another
process but it itself is holding a resource that the other process
needs. A computer system which allows more than one
process to be simultaneously active, holding and requesting
resources, may encounter the phenomenon of deadlock
(sometimes called deadly embrace).“Deadlock occurs so
infrequently that it is not worthwhile to degrade system
performance by executing prevention algorithms.”When
deadlock situation arise in an online computer system, the
system cannot respond within an acceptable period of time.
This is particularly true in process control applications, where
a very quick response is required of computer systems.
According to Coffman approaches to this problem can be
classified in three categories.(1)prevention (2)detection and
recovery and (3)avoidance.
Prevention approach:
The uses of resources are restricted so that system deadlock
will never occur .However this is a disadvantages of degrading
system performance, because of severe constraints in
resources usage.
Deadlock avoidance:
Pre-claim strategy used in operating system. And not effecting
in database environment.
Deadlock detection:
If transaction is blocked is blocked due to another transaction
make sure that transaction is not blocked on the first
transaction, either directly or indirectly via another
transaction. Using four predetermined application program
parameters obtained in the program development stage, a
directed graph model and a restriction matrix model are
introduced representing the usage of common resources.
ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINATION
1). Assumptions
Four predetermined parameter relating to the application
program must be given in the development stage
a) Mode of usage for resource in each task.
Information must be given as to whether each task request
common resource in shared usage or exclusive usage.
b) Sequence of common resources usage in each task.
c) Non-concurrent task.
In multiprogramming environment, a number of task are
activated and run simultaneously.
However there are pair o task which are never activated
concurrently with one another
d) Type and number of common resources.
In process control computer system it is not difficult to obtain
these parameters in the development stage of application
program.
2). DEFINATION –
1: Exclusive usage and Shared usage
i) Exclusive Usage:
3. A resource is said to be exclusive usage state, when being
used for only one task.
ii) Shared usage:
A resource is said to be shared usage state when being used in
more than one task.
3). DEFINATION - System deadlock
A resource is said to be shared usage state when being used in
more than one task.
3).DEFINATION - 2: System deadlock
When a task request a resource, the system is used to be in a
deadlock state if the following two conditions.
1. Either one of the two following situation is encountered.
a) A task request exclusive usage of a resource but the
resource is already being used for exclusive or shared usage
by one or more other tasks. The request is then suspended.
b) A task requests shared usage of resources, but resource
already being used for exclusive usage by another task .The
request then suspended.
2. The request for the resource can’t be accepted unless the
requesting task release at least one of the resources which the
task is holding.
3.’wait’ relation between resources :
If task T request resource Rj while holding resources Ri (i!=j)
it is said that resources Ri is waiting for resource Rj in task T .
This situation is denoted by Ri-> Rj. This relation is referred
as „wait relation between resource.‟
4. Propagation of wait relation:
Let T1 and T2 are two task. If the following two wait
relation .Ri 𝑇1 Rj and Rj 𝑇2 Rk are true and the usage of
resource Rj by T1 and T2 is in an exclusive usage state, it is
said that resource Ri is waiting for resource Rk via resource
Rj. This situation is denoted by Ri 𝑇1 Rj 𝑇2 Rk. This is
known as propagation of wait relation.
4).DEADLOCK WITH REUSABLE AND
CONSUMABLE RESOURCES:
Secondary storage, I/O devices, or processors, and software
components, such as data files, tables, or semaphores, are all
considered reusable resource
classes. Consumable resources are produced and consumed
dynamically, and have the following properties:
1. The number of units within a class varies at runtime; it may
be zero and is potentially unbounded.
2. A process may increase the number of units of a resource
class by releasing one or more units into that class; i.e.,
processes create new resources at runtime without acquiring
them first from the class.
3. A process may decrease the number of units of a resource
class by requesting and acquiring one or more units of that
class. Many types of data generated by either hardware or
software have the above characteristics of consumable
resources.
4.2 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm
Claim edge Pi → Rj indicated that process Pj may request
resource Rj; represented by a dashed line.
Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a
resource.
When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge
reconverts to a claim edge.
Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
4.3 Methods for Handling Deadlocks
Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state.
Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover.
Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur
in the system; used by most operating systems, including
UNIX.
4.4 Deadlock Prevention
Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must
hold for non-sharable resources.
Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process
requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources.
Require process to request and be allocated all its sources
before it begins execution, or allow process to request
resources only when the process has none. Low resource
utilization; starvation possible. Restrain the ways request can
be made.
No Preemption – If a process that is holding some resources
requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated
to it, then all resources currently being held are released.
Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for
which the process is waiting.
4.4.1 Safe State
When a process requests an available resource, system must
decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe
state.
System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all
processes.
Sequence <P1, P2, …, Pn> is safe if for each Pi, the resources
that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available
resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j<I.
1. If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi
can wait until all Pj have finished.
2. When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources,
execute, return allocated resources, and terminate.
3. When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources,
and so on.
Properties of Safe States:
• A safe state is not a deadlock state
• An unsafe state may lead to deadlock
• It is possible to go from a safe state to an unsafe
state
4. • Example: A system with 12 units of a resource
– Three processes
• P1: max need = 10, current need = 5
• P2: max need = 4, current need = 2
• P3: max need = 9, current need = 2
– This is a safe state, since a safe sequence <P2, P1, P3> exists
– P3 requests an additional unit. Should this request be
granted?
– No, because this would put the system in an unsafe state
• P1, P2, P3 will then hold 5, 2, and 3 resources (2
units are available)
• P2 s future needs can be satisfied, but no way to‟
satisfy P1 s and P3 s needs‟ ‟
• Avoidance algorithms prevent the system from
entering an unsafe state.
5). BASICS OF PETRI NETS
Petri nets are a graphical and mathematical modelling tool
applicable to many systems. It is a promising tool for
describing and studying information processing systems that
are characterized as being concurrent, asynchronous,
distributed, parallel, nondeterministic, and/or stochastic. The
main definitions related to Petri net models are introduced in a
very compact way.
A Petri net is a 3-tuple N=(P, T, F) where P and T are finite,
nonempty, and disjoint sets. P is the set of places and T is the
set of transitions. F∁(P×T)∪(T×P) is called the flow relation.
The preset of a node xPT is defined as
• x={y∈P∪T|(y, x) ∈F}. The postset of a node x∈P∪T is
defined as x={y ∈P∪T|(x, y)∈F}.
ELEMENTARY SIPHONS
We distinguish the strict minimal siphons (SMS) in a Petri net
by elementary and dependent ones. In the sequel, Π is used to
denote the set of strict minimal siphons, while ΠE and ΠD the
sets of elementary and dependent ones, respectively. Unless
otherwise stated, we refer to a strict minimal one when
mentioning a siphon.
6). DEADLOCK AVOIDANCE
• Main idea:
– request additional information about how resources are to be
requested
– before allocating request, verify that system will not enter a
deadlock state
( resources currently available,
resources currently allocated,
future requests and releases )
• if no: grant the request
• if yes: block the process
• Algorithms differ in amount and type of information
– simplest (also most useful) model: maximum number of
resources
– other choices
• sequence of requests and releases
• alternate request paths
6.1 Limitations of Deadlock Avoidance
• Deadlock avoidance vs. deadlock prevention
– Prevention schemes work with local information.
• What does this process already have, what is it asking
– Avoidance schemes work with global information.
• Therefore, are less conservative.
• However, avoidance schemes require specification of
future needs.
– not generally known for OS processes
– more applicable to specialized situations
• programming language constructs (e.g., transaction-
based systems)
• known OS components (e.g., Unix “exec”)
APPLICATION
The algorithm for checking deadlock possibility was
developing by introducing three theorems mentioned above.
8. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE:
In computer science, deadlock refers to a specific condition
when two or more processes are each waiting for the other to
release a resource, or more than two processes are waiting for
resources in a circular chain. Deadlock is a common problem
in multiprocessing where many processes share a specific type
of mutually exclusive resource known as a software lock or
soft lock. The future work includes developing some effective
and efficient deadlock prevention policies based on
elementary siphons in a Petri net. The problem of deadlock
detection in distributed systems has undergone extensive
study. In this paper we have tried to get rid of on distributed
deadlock by studying the performance representative
algorithms. Using four predetermined application program
parameters, a directed graph model representing the usage of
common resources by tasks and a restriction matrix model
were presented Sufficient conditions for system deadlock
prevention were mentioned. The methods in this paper is
useful in process control computer systems because the
algorithms introduced do have to be executed in real time
mode, and the restrictions on the usage of common resources
are applied when deadlock possibility is found. Thus
additional side effects on the responsiveness of the system will
not arise and the proper and higher utilization rate of common
resources is guaranteed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
5. The authors would like to acknowledge valuable discussions
with Prof. Binayak Sahu, Prof. Amarnath Singh, Prof.
Tanushree Mohapatra and Prof. Neelamani Samal for their
effort and cooperation in making this paper successful. This
work was supported by Gandhi Institute for Education and
Technology (GIET), Bhubaneswar.
REFRENCES
[1] E.G. Coffman, M.J. Elphick . System deadlock and computing
surveys.
[2] Operating system concepts ,Greg Gagne, Peter B. Galvin.
[3] J.W. Murphy, Resource allocation with interlock detection in a
multitasking system.
[4] Dijkstra N.W, and Scholten C.S., Termination detection for diffusing
computations, Inf. Process. Lett., 11(1), 1-4 (1980)
[5] Goldman B., Deadlock detection in computer networks. Tech. Rep.
MIT-LCS-TR185, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Mass., (1977)
[6] Gray J.N., Notes on database operating systems. In Operating
Systems: An Advanced Course, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 60, 393-481 (1978), Science Dept., Univ.
of Texas at Austin, July (1981).
[7] HOARE, C.A.R. Communicating sequential processes Commun.
ACM21, 8, 666-677
[8] B. Abdallah and H. A. ElMaraghy, “Deadlock Prevention and
Avoidance in FMS: a Petri net based approach”, Int. J Manuf. Tech.,
[9] Li, Z. W., Uzam, M., and Zhou, M. C., “Comments on „Deadlock
prevention policy based on Petri nets and siphons ”,‟ Int. J. Prod. Res.,
Vol. 42, No. 24, 2004, pp. 5253–5254.
[10] Murata, T., “Petri nets: properties, analysis, and applications”.
6. The authors would like to acknowledge valuable discussions
with Prof. Binayak Sahu, Prof. Amarnath Singh, Prof.
Tanushree Mohapatra and Prof. Neelamani Samal for their
effort and cooperation in making this paper successful. This
work was supported by Gandhi Institute for Education and
Technology (GIET), Bhubaneswar.
REFRENCES
[1] E.G. Coffman, M.J. Elphick . System deadlock and computing
surveys.
[2] Operating system concepts ,Greg Gagne, Peter B. Galvin.
[3] J.W. Murphy, Resource allocation with interlock detection in a
multitasking system.
[4] Dijkstra N.W, and Scholten C.S., Termination detection for diffusing
computations, Inf. Process. Lett., 11(1), 1-4 (1980)
[5] Goldman B., Deadlock detection in computer networks. Tech. Rep.
MIT-LCS-TR185, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Mass., (1977)
[6] Gray J.N., Notes on database operating systems. In Operating
Systems: An Advanced Course, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 60, 393-481 (1978), Science Dept., Univ.
of Texas at Austin, July (1981).
[7] HOARE, C.A.R. Communicating sequential processes Commun.
ACM21, 8, 666-677
[8] B. Abdallah and H. A. ElMaraghy, “Deadlock Prevention and
Avoidance in FMS: a Petri net based approach”, Int. J Manuf. Tech.,
[9] Li, Z. W., Uzam, M., and Zhou, M. C., “Comments on „Deadlock
prevention policy based on Petri nets and siphons ”,‟ Int. J. Prod. Res.,
Vol. 42, No. 24, 2004, pp. 5253–5254.
[10] Murata, T., “Petri nets: properties, analysis, and applications”.