Dr13 the future_of_health_care_insurance_whats_ahead3

About Deloitte
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally
separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms.
Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients
under the rules and regulations of public accounting.
This publication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or its and their affiliates are, by means of this publication,
rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or ser-
vices, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your finances or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect
your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.
None of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or its and their respective affiliates shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies
on this publication.
Copyright 2012 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
issue 13 | 2013
Complimentary article reprint
By paul keckley, Bill Copeland
and greg scott
> Illustration by igor morski
The future of health
care insurance:
What’s ahead?

Deloitte Review DELOIT TEREVIEW.COM
118 THE FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE INSURANCE: WHAT’S AHEAD?
T
he concept of insur-
ance is fairly straight-
forward: Individuals or
organizations purchase a service
that mitigates their risk in the
event of an unforeseen problem.
It’s about financial security—
hoping it may not be required to
use the coverage purchased but
hedging just in case. In many
insurance markets, premiums
paid by policyholders are pooled
so that the financial impact of a
single event doesn’t wipe out a
household or organization. The
majority pay, and over time,
many receive a payout, but in
a given year, a large majority
do not. Health insurance is an
exception where many poli-
cyholders use their insurance
frequently. Thus, the math of
insurance is about basics: pool-
ing of risk from a large number
of policyholders to fund a small-
er number of unforeseen losses.

DELOIT TEREVIEW.COM Deloitte Review
119
The future of
health care
insurance:
What’s
ahead?
BY PAUL KECKLEY, BILL COPELAND
AND GREG SCOTT
> ILLUSTRATION BY IGOR MORSKI

For many types of coverage, the insurance industry has two customers:
• Employers, including not-for-profit organizations, purchase a variety of in-
surance services—property and casualty coverage to mitigate damages to
physical property; directors and owners liability for errors of omission or
commission; liability protections; and for many bigger businesses, health
insurance coverage for employees, dependents, retirees, and so on. The same
is true for health insurance: Today, 56 percent of employers purchase health
insurance coverage for their employees.1
• Individuals purchase homeowners, auto, and life insurance coverage as
an after-tax discretionary investment. Insurance companies that target indi-
viduals frequently advertise on TV and are known for direct-to-consumer
marketing campaigns. Health insurance is also sold to consumers—cur-
rently comprising 17 million—termed “the individual insurance market” by
health insurers.2
But, in the United States, health
insurance is different than other
types of insurance coverage. It has
its origins in Texas where physi-
cians in the 1920s created a model
to help individuals handle the costs
of hospital care when needed.3
Two events drove the growth of
the industry in the modern era: to
recruit veterans returning from World War II, companies used their health insur-
ance coverage to differentiate in recruiting efforts. And in 1972, as part of the Nixon
administration, when wage and price controls were placed on employers to con-
trol runaway inflation, health insurance costs were not counted against constricted
wage ceilings. Health insurance offered by employers became standard fare—first
dollar coverage, modest (if any) co-payments, low premiums and deductibles, and
large networks of doctors and hospitals from which to choose were common fea-
tures of many plans. In effect, the workforce was treated to a benefit that mitigated
the full gamut of risk from routine office visits and medications to hospitalization
for serious medical problems. And Congress granted employers a tax exemption for
their portion of premiums now worth $216 billion today.4
Health insurance, therefore, is different than other types of insurance coverage.
Unlike insurance that covers risk for catastrophes or big-ticket items, health insur-
ance evolved as a form of comprehensive coverage for everything from minor cuts
... since the mid-1950s,
employers have paid the
bulk of costs for employee
coverage while being timid
about restrictions on how
their employees use the
benefit. That has changed.

121THE FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE INSURANCE: WHAT’S AHEAD?
and routine visits to organ replacement and accidents. It’s akin to a hypothetical
automobile insurance plan that covers flat tires, not just collisions. And compli-
cating matters, in traditional employer-sponsored coverage, the company pays 75
percent of the premium so the individual’s share is relatively low and the tendency
to overuse health services is high.5
Thus, consumers have little skin in the game. As
a result of these structural flaws, health insurance is widely used because it covers
everything—and it is expensive for the same reason.
WHERE IS THE INDUSTRY NOW?
Fast forward to the present, where the US health insurance industry plays a
ubiquitous role in the nation’s economy and in many American households.
More than 160 million Americans are covered by employer-sponsored insurance
plans.6
Another 17 million Americans purchase insurance for themselves in the
private insurance market, and about 100 million are covered by government-spon-
sored insurance plans.7
Notably, in each of these categories, there are unique eligi-
bility, enrollment, and premium requirements, and each is under intense regulatory
scrutiny at the state and federal levels.
It’s a big industry comprising about 400 operators, including 154 with more than
100,000 enrollees, with enrollment split almost evenly between investor-owned plans
and not-for-profit plans.8,9
And it is growing at home and abroad as individuals,
Graphic: Deloitte University Press | DUPress.com
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, Health insurance coverage of the total population
<http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.jsp?ind=125&cat=3>
■ Employer
■ Other public
■ Individual
■ Medicare
■ Medicaid
■ Uninsured
49%
1% 5%
13%
16%
16%
Figure 1. US breakdown of health insurance coverage, 2011

governments, and companies seek to mitigate the financial risk of health cost while
attracting/retaining employees.
Three major changes are reshaping the health insurance industry:
1. Changing role of employers in the insurance market: Many working
Americans choose a plan from options preselected by their employer, often
balancing the premium, out-of-pocket costs, and co-payments against the
size and scope of coverage and provider participation. And, since the mid-
1950s, employers have paid the bulk of costs for employee coverage while
being timid about restrictions on how their employees use the benefit. That
has changed. Employer activism is a forcing factor in the health insurance
industry: Ten percent of employers, mostly smaller companies and organi-
zations, dropped coverage altogether in the last decade.10
For those that have
maintained the benefit, a three-pronged strategy has become the norm:
• Shared financial responsibil-
ity with employees: Shifting financial
responsibility to employees via high
deductible plans and defined con-
tribution plans that replace benefits
programs are increasingly the norm
for employers. And employees are
being encouraged to pay attention
to prices for the services they use,
in some cases through incentives to
purchase from “high value” providers, and in other cases limiting access to
providers that are too pricey.
• Narrowing networks of providers: Employers are contracting with fewer pro-
viders (doctors and hospitals) to extract better prices and drive volume to
those that deliver higher quality and lower costs. In some cases, larger em-
ployers are contracting directly with providers; in others, they are pooled
through arrangements with health insurance companies to get better pric-
ing in their contracts.
• Focused efforts in employee wellness and prevention: Lifestyle-related hab-
its and chronic diseases contribute to 75 percent of health costs.11
Em-
ployers are using coaching programs targeted to employees with chronic
illnesses (obesity, diabetes, heart disease) and implementing incentives to
encourage healthy lifestyles. Employers believe wellness-related activities—
for those with medical problems already and to prevent the healthy from
... the Congressional Bud-
get Office (CBO) estimated
up to 27 million could be
newly insured, and over
the decade only 4 million
may lose coverage as a re-
sult of employers paying a
penalty and walking away.

becoming unhealthy—are strategic investments in their workforce strategy
and in health cost containment.
2. Increased enrollment in government-sponsored health insurance plans:
Today, enrollment in federal and state insurance programs is over 100 mil-
lion including Medicare, Medicaid, Federal Employee Health Plan, Chil-
dren’s Health Insurance Plan, State & Local Government Employee Health
Plans, and Military Health Plans (Veterans Health/TRICARE).
Enrollment in each is increasing, and as a result, the influence of the gov-
ernment as a sponsor of the health insurance programs is growing. In some
cases, government agencies purchase insurance coverage through private
insurance companies: For example, 13 million Medicare enrollees have a
Medicare Advantage Plan (Part C) purchased through a private insurer;
another 32 million have a Part D Prescription Drug Discount Plan offered
through private issuers; and private plans are routinely offered to federal,
state, and local employees.12
The significance of the increased role of government as a sponsor in the US
insurance market is size: It affords the government the ability to purchase
for large numbers of enrollees and negotiate aggressive terms and condi-
tions with private insurers who want to enroll and manage a plan on their
behalf. The growing role of the government as a purchaser of coverage for
employees from private health insurers is an important dynamic in the US
health insurance market.
3. The Affordable Care Act and health reform: The third factor driving fun-
damental change in the US health insurance industry was the passage of
the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010. Prior to the ACA, there
was no law that required employers to provide health insurance coverage
to employees and no law that required individuals to buy it for themselves.
Both have changed: The law requires employers with more than 50 full-
time employees to provide affordable insurance or pay a penalty—$2,000
per employee per year.13
And starting in 2014, US citizens not eligible for
Medicaid or other public programs must purchase health insurance or pay
a penalty that is the greater of $95 or 1 percent of the difference between the
household’s taxable income and tax threshold, increasing annually for three
years. As a result, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated up to
27 million could be newly insured, and over the decade only 4 million may

lose coverage as a result of
employers paying a penalty
and walking away.14,15,16
But the law also added a
number of new regula-
tory constraints on how
health insurance plans op-
erate, adding new rules at
the federal level and vest-
ing responsibility in states
to implement a number of
major structural changes
including Medicaid expan-
sion and creation of health
insurance exchanges. So
while the industry is likely
to see increased coverage as
a direct result of the ACA, it
also faces additional com-
pliance and oversight from
state and federal regulators.
Each of these three fac-
tors has contributed in a
unique way to the chang-
ing landscape of the health
insurance industry in
the United States. Each is
unique, but their combined
impact is a significant dis-
ruption to the industry.
WHAT’S AHEAD FOR THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY?
There are four likely themes that could help frame the future of the US health
insurance industry:
1. Enrollment growth at home and abroad: Enrollment in insurance plans
sold by private insurance companies may increase dramatically in coming
years. Employers that provide coverage may offer high deductible plans that
Figure 2. Affordable Care Act provisions
directly impacting the commercial health
insurance industry
Prohibits lifetime limits
Restricts annual limits
Restricts rescissions
Requires coverage for preventive services with no cost-
sharing
Extends dependent coverage to age 26
Requires uniform explanation of plan benefits
Prohibits discrimination based on employee compensation
Requires quality of care reporting
Requires reporting of medical loss ratio and provision of
rebates
Requires internal and external appeals processes
Patient protections
Annual rate review
Prohibits coverage exclusions for pre-existing conditions
Imposes adjusted community rating rules
Imposes guaranteed issue requirements
Imposes guaranteed renewability requirements
Prohibits discrimination based on health factors
Prohibits discrimination against medical providers
Requires coverage for essential health benefits
Limits out-of-pocket spending
Limits cost-sharing
Prohibits excessive waiting periods
Requires coverage for clinical trials for qualified individuals
Sources: ACA and Congressional Research Service [CRS]
analysis, *Includes Sections 1302, 1341, 1342, 1343,
1101, 1104, 1001, and 1201)

transfer risk to employees while protecting them against catastrophic costs.
Individuals lacking access to insurance through an employer and the self-
employed may purchase individual plans through private insurers. The pop-
ularity of the Medicare Part C and Part D programs shows no sign of slow-
ing, and individuals eligible for subsidies through state health insurance
exchanges may expand the market by up to 24 million per the CBO.17
And,
there’s growing interest among state legislators and governors to contract
with private plans to manage Medicaid enrollment. The health insurance
industry’s core value proposition—reducing costs by managing health—
is a solid platform for growth. The core competencies and infrastructure
necessary to manage individual and population health cost effectively are
required in health care systems worldwide, so enrollment growth may be
significant at home and exponential abroad for many US health insurance
operators.
2. Consolidation—fewer players with wider reach: The insurance industry
is heavily regulated and capital intense. The margins in its core business—
managing health—are thin, so for many, it’s a mandate to “go big or get out.”
Consolidation is accelerating in the US health insurance sector and in some
cases, globally.
Source: Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, Unlocking value in health plan M&A:
Sometimes the deals don’t deliver, 2012
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Figure 3. Number of announced health plan-related M&A transactions
Number of transactions
40
29
21
29
36
49

Margin erosion and increased regulatory oversight have driven increased merger
activity among incumbent companies. In 2011, 20 managed care M&A transactions
took place, totaling nearly $8 billion, and more deals took place the year after the
ACA was enacted than in each of the three years prior.18
The increased “urge to merge” is driven by necessity in many cases: Increased
Figure 4. US health insurance market
Significant absence of health insurer
competition exists (based on revised
Horizontal Merger Guidelines issued 2010 by
the US Department of Justice and Federal Trade
Commission)
83% of metropolitan markets rate
as “highly concentrated”
At least one health insurer had a commercial
market share of 50% or more
Roughly 50% of metropolitan
markets
Two largest health insurers had a combined
commercial market share of 70% or more
24 of 48 states studied
Average market share of state’s largest
insurer
Individual market: 54%
Small group market: 51%
Average number of state insurers with at
least 5% market share
Individual market: 4
Small group market: 4
States with least competitive commercial
health insurance markets
From least to most competitive:
Alabama, Alaska, Delaware,
Hawaii, District of Columbia,
Maine, Michigan, Nebraska
Sources: AMA, “2011 Competition in Health Insurance: A Comprehensive Study of US
Markets”; Kaiser Family Foundation, “How Competitive are State Insurance Markets?”

costs of operations and downward pressure on premiums by individual, employ-
er, and government purchasers are a requisite for scalability and size. It’s increas-
ingly a competitive industry that historically pits strong “local” brands against
“national” brands. Consolidation is expected to continue among US operators,
as well as acquisitions of insurance companies in emerging and developed health
systems of the world.
In all likelihood, there may be fewer US health insurers, but their enrollment
and scope of operations may be broader.
3. Diversification—new products and services: The health insurance
industry is in the enviable
position to take advantage
of these major drivers of
innovation:
• Consumerism: Behavioral eco-
nomics is a daunting term. It
essentially means that indi-
vidual behavior is influenced
by a complex set of triggers—
incentives, circumstances,
needs, values, opportuni-
ties—that determine how
we respond. The majority of
health care costs worldwide
are the direct result of unhealthy lifestyles and/or failure to adhere to rec-
ommended treatment plans. Nevertheless, how does a health care system
change how its citizens behave? The health insurance industry might pro-
vide new mechanisms to influence behavior—incentives, benefits design,
and technologies—that reward desired responses from individuals and
populations. As the individual (retail) insurance market grows, the ability
to adapt health plans to individual needs and offer self-care tools that are
useful when making decisions provides an attractive opportunity.19
• Integrated health: In an emerging trend, the convergence of clinical and
administrative management of the system means bigger organizations that
deliver and finance health care services (a.k.a. integrated health systems).
Insurers are in an enviable position to collaborate with or acquire clinical
delivery capabilities either through acquisitions or as business partners in
accountable care organizations and medical homes. In some communities,
health insurers may become business partners to hospitals and physicians
Ultimately, the health in-
surance industry’s value
proposition boils down
to this: managing health
costs without compromis-
ing safety and outcomes.
The escalating costs of
health care borne by em-
ployers, families, and tax-
payers calls for innovative
solutions that balance
these dual goals.

who sponsor a plan. In others, health insurers might manage a provider’s
accountable care organization or medical home programs. In a few, health
insurers may own and operate hospitals and clinics, and manage a network
of employed physicians.
• Big data: Health care is rich in data and weak in information. As health insur-
ers engage as business partners in large, regional/national integrated systems
of care, they may amass huge amounts of data about what treatments work
best, which diagnostics are predictive, what stimuli prompt optimal con-
sumer engagement, how processes optimize efficiency, and what everything
costs based on an individual’s customized plan. And the emergence of state
insurance exchanges, widespread adoption of electronic health records in
medical practices and hospitals, and the ubiquitous presence of social media
provide huge opportunities for further data gathering (as well as opportuni-
ties for its abuse). As a result, health
insurers may play a lead role as info-
mediaries about health—structuring
data into useful tools for individuals,
employers, and providers.
4. Value—the balance of costs
and care: Notably, in the heat of
the health reform debate of 2009,
President Obama used a phrase that
is perhaps the essence of one of the
health insurance industry’s greatest challenges: trust. On numerous occa-
sions he reiterated this reference to trust, and while encouraging the passage
of health care reform, cited a need to “keep them honest,” in reference to
insurance providers.
Like any industry that is highly regulated, highly visible, big, and getting
bigger, US health insurers are in the spotlight. It is an industry that elicits
strong feelings and wide ranging opinions.
• Many physicians think health insurance plans limit access to needed cov-
erage they recommend and impose unnecessary administrative paperwork
that’s burdensome and costly.20
• Many employers think health insurance benefits are a necessary but costly
talent recruitment and retention strategy.21
The majority of health care
costs worldwide are the
direct result of unhealthy
lifestyles and/or failure to
adhere to recommended
treatment plans. Neverthe-
less, how does a health
care system change how
its citizens behave?

• Consumers who can afford health insurance coverage think it a hedge
against back-breaking health care costs. Yet even those with coverage do
not feel completely secure. See our latest findings from the 2012 Deloitte*
Survey of US Health Care Consumers.
• Ironically, seniors on Medicare feel the most secure of all insurance popu-
lations—perhaps the reason politicians are hyper-sensitive to changes that
might arouse their passion to protect the program.22
Trust is an issue for the industry. The potential loss of financial security as a
result of health costs is a widespread fear, even among those with health insurance.
Health insurers understand the challenge. Their response to date has not fully
remedied the trust gap fully. Some are rebranding, some are methodically changing
their business model to enhance relationships with consumers, and all are active
in educating legislators and community leaders about the role and scope of their
operations. It may likely take more effort. Increased transparency about the busi-
ness operations in a health plan—how coverage and denial decisions are made, how
Source: Deloitte Center for Health Solutions,“Deloitte 2012 Survey of US Health Care Consumers,”
June 2012
Figure 5. Percentage of consumers who feel their household is ﬁnancially
prepared to handle future health care costs
Insured
Uninsured
■ 65+ years ■ 55–64 years ■ 45–54 years ■ 25–44 years ■ 18–24 years
42%
29%
26%
18%
17%
6%
33%
20%
16%
15%
14%
12%
5%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2009 2010 2011 2012
*As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a
detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries.

doctors and hospitals are evaluated and compensated, how premiums are spent—is
clearly a step in that direction.
Ultimately, the health insurance industry’s value proposition boils down to this:
managing health costs without compromising safety and outcomes. The escalating
costs of health care borne by employers, families, and taxpayers call for innovative
solutions that balance these dual goals. The health insurance industry has an op-
portunity to deliver on this value proposition, leveraging its unique competencies
in partnerships with providers.
Bets of the demise of the health insurance industry are ill-advised. It’s an indus-
try with challenges but with substantial opportunity. If managed care is a dubious
concept in some circles, unmanaged care is the greater risk. Therefore, the future of
the insurance industry is bright—at home and abroad. DR
Paul Keckley is the executive director of the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions with Deloitte
Consulting LLP.
Bill Copeland, is vice chairman, US Life Sciences & Health Care leader and the US Health Plans
leader with Deloitte LLP.
Greg Scott, is a principal in Deloitte Consulting LLP’s US Life Sciences & Health Care practice and
national consulting leader for the Health Plans sector.

Endnotes
1. US Census Bureau (2012). “Table C-3. Health Insurance Coverage by Age: 1999 to 2011.”<http://www.census.gov/
prod/2012pubs/p60-243.pdf>
2. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “The Impact of Health Reform on the Individual Insurance Market,” October
2011.
3. Alex Blumberg and Adam Davidson, “Accidents of History Created US Health System,” October 2009. <http://www.
npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114045132>
4. The Commonwealth Fund, Progressive or Regressive? A second look at the tax exemption for employer-sponsored
health insurance premiums, May 2009.
5. Kaiser Family Foundation, Snapshots: Health care cost, November 2012.
6. The Commonwealth Fund, Whither employer-based health insurance? September 2007.
7. US Government Accountability Office, “Private health insurance coverage: Expert views on approaches to encour-
age voluntary enrollment,” February 2011; National Center for Policy Analysis, “Understanding health reform,”
January 2011.
8. Paul H. Keckley, “Five C's of 2013: Clarity, Costs, Compliance, Consolidation, and Consumers,” Deloitte Center for
Health Solutions, January 2013.
9. Alliance for Advancing Non-Profit Health Care, “Basic Facts and Figures: Nonprofit Health Plans,” 2012.
10. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “2012 Deloitte survey of US employers: Opinions about the US health care
system and plans for employee health benefits,” July 2012.
11. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, “Chronic Diseases: The Power to Prevent, The Call to Control—At A
Glance 2009,” December 2009.
12. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC),“Medicare Payment Policy,” March 2013.
13. Kaiser Family Foundation, Penalties for employers not offering affordable coverage under the Affordable Care Act
beginning in 2014, March 2013.
14. Kaiser Family Foundation, The requirement to buy coverage under the Affordable Care Act beginning in 2014,
March 2013; Congressional Budget Office.
15. Congressional Budget Office, “CBO’s February 2013 estimate of the effects of the Affordable Care Act on health
insurance coverage,” February 2013.
16. Congressional Budget Office, “CBO and JCT’s estimates of the effects of the Affordable Care Act on the number of
people obtaining employment-based health insurance,” March 2012.
17. Ibid.
18. <http://www.levinassociates.com/pr2012/managedcare>
19. To learn more about the retail market and disruptive innovation, check out the Deloitte report “Power to the
People? How health care reform could result in the disruption of the group health insurance industry.” The report
explains how, through a mechanism of change known as “disruptive innovation,” upstarts and new entrants may
assume marketplace leadership at the expense of group health insurance incumbents.
20. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “Physician perspectives about health care reform and the future of medical
profession,” December 2011.
21. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “2012 Deloitte Survey of US Employers: Opinions about the US Health Care
System and Plans for Employee Health Benefits,” July 2012.
22. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “Deloitte 2012 Survey of US Health Care Consumers,” June 2012.

Dr13 the future_of_health_care_insurance_whats_ahead3

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (9)

Similar to Dr13 the future_of_health_care_insurance_whats_ahead3 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Dr13 the future_of_health_care_insurance_whats_ahead3