Enercom
The Oil & Gas Conference - Denver
(Nasdaq: ESES)
Disclosure
This presentation contains statements about future events and expectations that can be
characterized as forward-looking statements, including, in particular, statements about the
Company’s plans, strategies and prospects. The use of the words “anticipate,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking
statements. Although the Company believes that the plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, they do involve
certain assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and the Company cannot assure you that those
expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors described in this
presentation. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. The
Company cannot assure you that its future results will meet its expectations and investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company
or its authorized representatives. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to the Company and persons acting on its behalf are qualified in their entirety by
the cautionary statements contained in this paragraph and elsewhere in this presentation.
The Company does not have any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or
revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this presentation or the admission
document to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations about the statement or any
change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the statement is based.
2
Investment Highlights
Technology-driven, oilfield services company building a business in fast-growing, higher-margin international
shale regions
~ 80% of shale reserves located outside North America – with just 20% of global pressure pumping capacity
Highly experienced and successful management team with comprehensive international oil and gas track record
Early mover in one of the largest and most active international shale opportunities – Vaca Muerta in Argentina
Assets, contracts and personnel in place and operating in Argentina
Argentina government encouraging energy investments; expect strong growth in undersupplied market
Strong financial and strategic partners with significant emerging market and geopolitical experience
3
Technology-Driven, Emerging Growth Platform
• Emerging growth, technology-driven independent oilfield service
company providing:
– Well stimulation;
– Coiled tubing; and
– Field management services
• Focused on reducing the ecological impact and improving the
economic performance of the well stimulation process
• Assembling proven technologies and processes to:
– Reduce the surface footprint, horsepower and capital cost;
– Reduce emissions and methane leakage; and
– Conserve fuel and water
• Focused on bringing best practices and proven technologies to the
most active shale resource basins outside the United States:
– Initial focus on the high-quality Vaca Muerta in Argentina; and
– Base Level Contract in place through 2016
– Approved as vendor for YPF; now largest customer
• Funding in place to grow HHP from 10,000 to 52,000 by early 2016
Capitalize on emerging market developments and sentiment for “Eco-Friendly” unconventional solutions
4
Vaca Muerta
World’s 3rd largest
shale resource basin
Seasoned Leadership Team with Highly Relevant Experience
Bjarte Bruheim
Chairman and Founder
J. Chris Boswell
President, CEO and
Founder
Alexander Nickolatos
Chief Financial Officer and
Assistant Secretary
Carlos A. Fernandez
Sr. VP, Corp. Development
General Mgr., Latin America
Relevant Experience
• 28 years experience in the oilfield service industry
• 15 years experience in finance and accounting
• 30+ years international management experience
• 35+ years senior management experience in Latin America
Bobby Chapman
Chief Operating Officer
• 35+ years senior management oilfield experience
5
Miguel Di Vincenzo
VP, Sales & Technology
Mark Stevenson
VP, Marketing & Geophysics
• 30+ years senior geophysical management experience
• 28 years oilfield services experience in Latin America
• Co-founded by Bjarte Bruheim in
1991; served as President until 2001
• Chris Boswell CFO from 1995-2002;
directed >$3 billion in growth capital
• Grew from 2 ships to 33% share of
the marine seismic market by 1998
• Now has 16 marine seismic vessels,
with 33 offices in 25 countries
• Developed in 1995 by Bjarte Bruheim,
Chris Boswell and others utilizing
PGS’ seismic library as seed capital
• Initially funded by Warburg Pincus
• Completed $116 million IPO in 1999
• Acquired by Norsk Hydro ASA (now
Statoil ASA) for $2.45 billion in 2005
• Deepwater exploration venture initially
capitalized by Bjarte Bruheim and
Warburg Pincus
• Acquired certain electromagnetic
technologies from Statoil ASA in 2004
• Completed IPO in 2007 valuing the
company at ~$1.6 billion
• Bjarte Bruheim named Executive
Chairman of financially troubled
seismic equipment designer in 2002
• Successfully arranged new investor
capital to help turn around company
• Sold to Rolls-Royce in 2009 for
approximately $200 million
• Co-founded by Bjarte Bruheim in
2009 as an E&P vehicle to utilize
EMGS technology to de-risk offshore
targets
• Sold to Tullow Oil in 2012 for up to
$672 million total consideration
• Norwegian marine seismic venture co-
founded by Bjarte Bruheim in 2005
• Listed on Oslo Stock Exchange in 2007
• Signed contracts for construction of 6
advanced 12-streamer 3D vessels
• Acquired by Schlumberger in 2007 for
$838 million in cash consideration
• Co-founded by Bobby Chapman in
2005 with backing from Soros and ESS
• Grew to 6 crews and 130,000 HHP by
the second half of 2007
– Contracts in place for 3 additional
crews at 56,000 HHP
• Sold to Trican Well Service in 2007 for
$256 million
• In 2009, Chris Boswell was hired as
CFO to re-set strategy and divest
assets for a distressed silicon valley
backed oilfield technology company
• Mr. Boswell and Carlos Fernandez
successfully farmed 5 blocks in
Neuquén province of Argentina
• Arranged $60 million in expansion
capital from new investors in 2011,
including Microsoft founder Bill Gates
and Energy Capital Group
Track Record of Consistent Success Building Profitable Energy Service Platforms
6
Five exits valued at +$4.5 billion; Three ongoing entities valued at $2+ billion
Leading Equity Sponsors with Extensive Oilfield and Emerging Markets Expertise
Bjarte Bruheim
Co-Founder or Founding Shareholder of PGS, Spinnaker
Exploration Company, EMGS, Eastern Echo & Spring
Energy
Bill Montgomery
Managing Director, Quantum Energy Partners & Former
head of Global Energy Practice, Goldman Sachs
S. Wil Vanloh, Jr.
Co-Founder & CEO, Quantum Energy Partners
Steve Webster
Co-Managing Partner & Co-CEO, Avista Capital Partners
Robert Cabes
Managing Director, White Deer Energy
Experienced energy investors dominate the founding
shareholder group
In July 2014, the Company received $30
million in private financing from
Albright Capital Management
• Founded in 2005, Albright Capital Management, LLC (“ACM”) is an
internationally recognized private investment firm chaired by former United
States Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
– $329 million in assets under management dedicated exclusively to
investments in emerging markets
– Extensive experience pursuing successful foreign investments and
managing geopolitical risks
• $33.5 million total investment in the Company
– 1,333,334 shares issued at $6.00 per share in July 2014
– 173,913 shares issued at $5.75 per share in February 2015 offering
– 526,315 shares issued at $4.75 per share in July 2015
– $22 million Senior secured convertible debt facility
 14.0% annual coupon payable in arrears; matures in May 2018
 Convertible at $6.00 per share
• Currently have 3 seats on the Company’s Board of Directors
7
Underwritten offerings in 2015 have added the
following large investors (over 10% holders) to the
Company:
- Gilder Gagnon
- Bienville Capital Management
- Hayman Capital (Kyle Bass)
Eco-Stim’s recipe for a successful international shale play
1. Geology – Resource produces economic
hydrocarbons
2. Pace of activity – Sufficient wells to maintain
good equipment utilization
3. Demand for hydrocarbons – Production
consumed locally or export potential
4. Infrastructure – Roads, housing, fuel, pipelines
and support services
5. Local knowledge – Feet on the ground; local
network
6. Business risk – Regulations, taxes, security,
culture, ethics, etc.
Top 10 Countries with Technically Recoverable Shale Gas Resources
Top 10 Countries with Technically Recoverable Shale Oil Resources
802
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
(tcf)
27
0
20
40
60
80
(bboe)
Source: EIA and Accenture.
Approximately 75% of global shale resources lie outside the United States
8
Key Ingredients For Successful Shale Plays
9
Argentina’s Vaca Muerta is one of two successful international shale developments
Of those nations with significant shale resources, Argentina is well-positioned to attract significant new
investment in unconventional development
Source: YPF, EIA, SPE.
• World’s third largest resource nation of shale oil and gas
• One of the fastest growing import markets for natural gas
• Established pipeline and strong facility infrastructure
• 100 year energy production history provides experienced oil
and gas workforce
• New hydrocarbon law is industry friendly
• Government supported oil price of $77 per barrel
• Government supported gas price of $7.50
• YPF production from Vaca Muerta nearing 45,000 BOE
Vaca Muerta Barnett Haynesville Marcellus Eagle Ford Bakken
TOC (%) 6 5 2 12 4 12
Thickness (m) 200 91 76 61 61 30
Depth (m) 3,000 2,286 3,658 2,057 2,287 1,829
Area (km2) 30,000 16,726 23,310 245,773 5,180 51,800
Reservoir pressure
(psi)
8,000 3,525 10,800 3,375 4,502 4,200
Pressure gradient
(psi/ft)
0.65-1.0 0.47 0.90 0.50 0.60 0.70
Summary Comparison of Vaca Muerta and Key U.S. Shales
High-quality liquids-rich shale with established infrastructure, manageable logistics
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Argentina Mexico Venezuela Brazil Colombia Ecuador Bolivia Peru Chile Trinidad And
Tobago
2013 2014
10
Investments, rig count and number of operators are all increasing
Average Rig Counts by Country
Source: Baker Hughes.
• Argentina is one of Latin America’s fastest-growing oil
and gas exploration markets:
– 20 new “shale” drilling rigs moved to Argentina over
last 18 months; highest rig count in many years
• YPF is expected to spend $37 billion over five years:
– JV partners: Chevron, Dow Chemical, Petrola Pampa,
Petronas, Sinopec and most recently Gazprom
– ExxonMobil, Shell, CNOOC, Pluspetrol, Petrobras,
Total, and Tecpetrol also maintain substantial drilling
budgets
Domestic operators under extreme pressure from the government to drill and produce hydrocarbons
24%
E&P Companies Operating in Argentina
11
Strong Demand, High Imports, Lack of Dollars, Big Resource and New President
• Argentina has pressing need for increased production:
– Energy deficit driven by underinvestment
– Consumption began to exceed production in 2009
– Importing substantial portion of daily consumption
• Domestic price controls shielding market from global oil plunge:
– Lack of dollars available to buy imported oil
– Domestic oil and gas prices near highest levels on record
• New Federal Hydrocarbon Law sets nationwide rules and
incentives to provide greater certainty for foreign operators
– Lower investment thresholds to qualify for export tax
exemptions
– Provincial royalties capped at 12%
– Holding period for concessions extended to 35 years
– Elimination of certain import restrictions on drilling equipment
Source: EIA.
Argentina has approved reforms aimed at attracting foreign shale investment to erase costly energy deficit
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Bcf
Argentina’s Dry Natural Gas Production & Consumption 1990-2013
Source: EIA.
Production
Consumption
Net Trade
Depression and
financial crisis
Argentina’s Natural Gas Imports and Exports
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Bcf
Imports
Exports
12
WTI Oil Price August 2015 = $45/barrel
Average Argentina Basket Oil Price for Q2 2015 = $69/barrel
Henry Hub Natural Gas Price in March 2015 = $2.80/mcf
YPF’s Disclosed Average Natural Gas Price for Q2 2015 = $4.58/mcf
$42 $42
$66 $69
$1.50 $2.50 $5.00 $4.58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2005 2010 2012 2015
Argentina Commodity Price Development
Oil Price Gas Price
Commodity Prices in Argentina are set by the Government
$350,000
$97,000 $92,000 $87,500 $86,000
Argentina Eagle Ford Marcellus Bakken Permian
Barriers to Entry and Lack of Sufficient Stimulation Equipment Drive Pricing Power
Barriers to Entry:
• Importation of new stimulation equipment has been limited
• Any new equipment into country must be negotiated with at least 3
agencies (Ministry of Industry, Department of Trade, and Customs Office)
• Matching agreements need to be negotiated with local vendors
• Government typically favors protectionist policies
• Perception of challenging repatriation
13
While North America holds an estimated 15% of worldwide shale reserves, it has about 80% of global pressure pumping capacity
AverageRevenueperStage
$600,000 - $750,000
(depending on service provided)
* * * *
* Management believes all prices in all U.S. basins have been reduced 30-35% in 2015 from these 2014 levels
Actual Eagle Ford VS Predicted Vaca Muerta
- Drilling Rigs and Stimulation Fleets
4
160
265
220
1
50
87
75
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2008 2010 2012 2014
% of Drilling Rigs # of Stimulation Fleets
20 35
85
135
200
220
3
10
27
45
65
75
0
50
100
150
200
250
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
% of Drilling Rigs # of Stimulation Fleets
Eagle Ford play in Texas - 4 rigs & 1 Frac
crew operating in 2008
Vaca Muerta play in Argentina - 30 rigs & 7
modern Frac crews operating in mid-2014
14Source: Management research; Simmons & Co
15
Argentina Market Segmentation – ESES expanding to all three market segments
Argentina Well Stimulation Market
Capex from the proceeds of the July 2015 equity offering will give the Company an opportunity to participate in all three markets
32%
Tight Gas
35%
Unconventional
29%
Other
4%
Eco-Stim
33%
Conventional
16
Illustrative Per Fleet Fully Deployed HHP Build Up Through Projected Fleet Additions
Impact of Fleet Additions on Hydraulic Horsepower
Unconventional
Fleet #1
Targeting operation
in 3Q16; Argentina
Conventional
Fleet #1
Currently operating;
Argentina
Tight Gas
Unit #1
Targeting operation
4Q15; Argentina
HHP in reserve to be
deployed as needed
10,000
16,000
52,000
27,000
79,000
27,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
HydraulicHorsepower
Available HHP Total HHP
17
Multiple Benefits of TPUs
Multi-Fuel
Capabilities
• Designed to run on field gas, LNG, CNG, Diesel or bi-fuel
• No loss in efficiency and horsepower
Lower
Emissions
• Lower emissions than conventional diesel engines
• ~60% below Tier IV standards for NOx and CO
• No methane slippage issues compared to diesel or bi-fuel
Smaller
Footprint
• Single unit trailer with twice the horsepower as conventional engines
• Uniquely outfitted with twin triplex pumps
Fuel Savings
• Total annual savings opportunity of nearly $10 million compared to a
traditional diesel fleet
Purchased at
Significant
Discount
• Purchased 54,000 HHP of the latest generation turbine-powered
pressure pumping units at 80% discount to replacement cost
Multiple benefits over conventional diesel-powered well stimulation equipment
Comparison of Physical Footprint
Unique clean turbine pumping technology with proven capability to operate in unconventional shale regions
Latest generation turbine-powered
pressure pumping unit (4,500 HP)
Conventional diesel-powered pump
(1,800-2,500 HP)
18
Illustrative Market Economics for New Argentina Equipment
Illustrative Run-Rate Field Level Cash Flow for Comparable Equipment*
Conventional & Tight Gas
Pumping Fleets
Unconventional Fleet
*For illustrative purposes only based on industry observations of peer companies.
Note: Does not reflect general administrative and corporate overhead expenses.
Coiled Tubing Unit
Stages per Month Stages per Month Number of Jobs per Month 8 to 12
Average Price per Stage Average Price per Stage Average Revenue per Job $65,000 to $70,000
Average Monthly Revenue Average Revenue per Job Average Monthly Revenue
Average Monthly Operating Cost Average Operating Cost per Job Average Monthly Operating Cost
Average Monthly Gross Margin Average Gross Margin per Job Average Monthly Gross Margin
Gross Margin (%) Gross Margin (%) Gross Margin (%)
Total Investment ($MM) Total Investment ($MM) Total Investment ($MM)
Gross Margin Payback Period Gross Margin Payback Period Gross Margin Payback Period
12 25
$13.5
19 months
$600,000
$15,000,000
$9,000,000
$6,000,000
40%
$27.0
$150,000
$1,800,000
$1,080,000
$720,000
40%
5 months
$620,000
$372,000
$248,000
40%
$6.5
26 months
According to Welling & Co, the primary reason for poor performing shale wells is the
lack of subsurface understanding
19
Due to low understanding of the subsurface & currently low
oil prices, 80% of unconventional wells are “uneconomic”
Source: IHS
80% not economic to
produce
20% are good wells
20
Once subsurface is understood, sweet spots can be located.
Note that almost 90% of all production comes from a few wells
“Hogs” and “Large”
wells account for
almost 90% of new
production
21
Source: IHS
22
Technology Platform to Identify Sweet Spots and “Ground Truth”
• Leverages fiber-optic technology and predictive modeling (how many stages don’t actually produce hydrocarbons?)
• Enables Eco-Stim to efficiently predict stimulation effectiveness and understand the shale in real-time
1. Predict
3. Measure
4. Evaluate
Prediction
Proprietary process to efficiently
predict “sweet spots” in shale plays
Stimulate all planned stages
as designed
Downhole technologies to determine
which stages are actually producing
Compare prediction of
sweet spots to actual
production
“Learn” best producing areas of the
formation in a given area and
incorporate information into next
geophysical prediction
5. Update
Model
2. Execute
Predict, Execute, Measure, Evaluate, Re-Predict
Eco-Stim conducts its horizontal stimulation services within a systematic methodology
Example of “Sweet Spot” Prediction
Mud logs on this horizontal well show flare markers that confirm predictive fracture maps
30 Ft
Flare
7610
5 Ft
Flare
7970
5 Ft
Flare
8630
5 Ft
Flare
8742
3 Ft
Flare
9659
4 Ft
Flare
10480
4 Ft
Flare
11305
Mud Log Fracture Flare Gas
-
+
• Using proprietary technology for
accurate well placement and
stimulation stage planning
• Maps produced in less than three
weeks at minimal cost
• Over 350 shale projects
completed in U.S. shale plays
• Over 25 projects completed in
Argentina
Curvature Attributes
• Flares correlate with Geo-Predict
sweet spot mapping – confirming
the effectiveness of Geo-Predict’s
methodology
23
Mud logs on this horizontal well show flare markers that confirm predictive fracture maps
Confirmation of Producing Zones…..
(It is generally accepted in the industry that only one of three stages actually produce)
… Derived from Fiber Optic Acoustic Signatures
TIME
Gas Production from zone 6
Gas + Water Production
from zone 8
9 7 6 5 4 3 2 18
24
5.3
1.2
Conventional Geopredict
Once confidence is built in predictive techniques, substantial cost savings can be achieved
7x
70k
30x
70k
$1.6 million in
savings
Reduction in Stimulation Zones Cost Comparison ($Millions)
Fiber optic distributed acoustic data confirms production in 5 of the 7
predicted sweet spots – 71% accuracy
By utilizing GeoPredict the number of stimulation zones can
be reduced – $1.6 million in reduced cost when going from
30 to 7 stimulations each priced at $70,000
$2.1
$.490
Result of “Smart” stimulation process is to concentrate stages in those areas with the highest probability of production thus
reducing cost and increasing recovery rate
Jobs executed with 30 zones stimulated
ConventionalFieldManagement
25
7 predicted zones to stimulate from GeoPredict
Fiber optics sensing confirming sweet spots
In new shale plays, technology advances can accelerate learning curve and focus
efforts in high probability regions
Early Maps Of Eagle Ford
Play in Texas - 2009
Well Drilled in Eagle Ford
to Identify “Sweet Spots”
and to “hold” acreage
2008-2012
Best producing areas
within Eagle Ford play -
2013
Five Years and Billions of Dollars
26
Source: EIA
Eagle Ford “Hogs” after years of Drilling; Clearly certain areas produce better
than other areas; formation is not homogeneous
27
LCav.e-6
Upper Resistivity Zone
EcoStim Field Management System
(Example from Permian Basin)
Real-Time Fiber-Optic Data
Recorded on Vertical Appraisal Well
with 18 Stages
Stage 11
Stage 12
Stage 13
Stage 14
Stage 15
Stage 16
Stage 17
Stage 18
Stage 2
Stage 4
Stage 3
Stage 1
Stage 5
Stage 6
Stage 7
Stage 8
Stage 9
Stage 10
Correlates with most prolific
production zones
Correlates with most prolific
production zones
28
Proprietary Geo-Predict Results
Show Correlation w/ Best Zones
Upper Resistivity Zone Production
All Wells-Acoustic Impedance
GeoPredictSM searches out reoccurrence of key attributes
to provide guidance as to “Sweet Spots” in new shale plays
Attributes observed in monitored zones can be
projected out to surrounding region
(not actual results of study)
29
Neuqen
City
EcoStim – 30% Sequential Revenue Growth
30
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5
2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015
Revenue
Revenue
EcoStim – Capital Structure
31
9%
15%
36%
40%
Shares Outstanding - 13.5M
Employees & Founders ACM
Argentina Strategic Investors Public Float
12%
31%
26%
31%
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding - 18.2M
Employees & Founders ACM
Argentina Strategic Investors Public Float
EcoStim – Capital Efficiency
Description Amount
Total Capital Secured Since Inception $75 million
Total HHP Deployed When Current Capacity
Is Fully Operational
80,000 HHP
Average Cost Per HHP Deployed $940
Average Cost Per HHP For Industry $1,000
32
In summary, we started a company from scratch, hired a team,
developed a customer base over a three year period, evaluated &
acquired IP, licensed technology, imported equipment and started
an operation;
AND bought equipment, ALL for a grand total of $940 per HHP.
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
33
June 30, 2015
Pro Forma
Adjustments
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
June 30, 2015
(Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,593,271 $ 27,373,591 A $ 30,966,862
Other current assets 9,940,447 - 9,940,447
Total current assets 13,533,718 27,373,591 40,907,309
Total non-current assets 28,564,976 - 28,564,976
Total assets $ 42,098,694 $ 27,373,591 $ 69,472,285
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Total current liabilities 11,468,904 (2,485,163) B 8,983,741
Total non-current liabilities 23,805,857 - 23,805,857
Total liabilities 35,274,761 (2,485,163) 32,789,598
Total stockholders' equity 6,823,933 29,858,754 36,682,687
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 42,098,694 $ 27,373,591 $ 69,472,285
A Relates to July 15, 2015 equity raise whereby Company issued 6,164,690 shares of common stock at $4.75 per share
B Relates to July 15, 2015 ACM interest payable conversion to common stock at a price of $4.75 per share
Investment Highlights
Technology-driven, oilfield services company with the goal of building a business in fast-growing, higher-margin
international shale regions
~ 80% of shale reserves located outside North America – with just 20% of global pressure pumping capacity
Highly experienced and successful management team with comprehensive international oil and gas track record
Early mover in one of the largest and most active international shale opportunities – Vaca Muerta, Argentina
Assets, contracts and personnel in place and operating in target market
Argentina Gov. price support encourages energy investment; expect strong growth in undersupplied market
Strong financial and strategic partner with significant emerging market and geopolitical experience
34

More Related Content

PDF
Gq presentation-feb2015
PDF
Northern Petroleum Plc - Analyst Presentation May 2017
PPT
Archer PowerPoint Feb 9
PPTX
First mountain presentation
PPT
Archer Powerpoint Feb 19
PDF
Arctic Hunter Energy (TSX.V - AHU) Corporate Presentation
PPTX
Mao marketing-presentation-june2013
PPTX
Bolivar energycorp 2.2 (approved by pre for arrendajo)
Gq presentation-feb2015
Northern Petroleum Plc - Analyst Presentation May 2017
Archer PowerPoint Feb 9
First mountain presentation
Archer Powerpoint Feb 19
Arctic Hunter Energy (TSX.V - AHU) Corporate Presentation
Mao marketing-presentation-june2013
Bolivar energycorp 2.2 (approved by pre for arrendajo)

What's hot (20)

PDF
corporate_presentation
PPTX
ERHC Presentation at the 8th Annual Sub-Saharan Africa Oil & Gas Conference
PDF
Teranga gold agm 2018
PPT
Savanna Energy Services Corporate Presentation September 2009
PPTX
Tvi corporate presentation december 2016
PDF
Investor preso final.compressed
PDF
Asanko jv webcast preso final
PDF
Claude Resources Inc. Corporate Presentation March 2014
PDF
Lion One Metals March Presentation
PDF
Tvi pacific corporate presentation 24.06.2021 v2
PDF
Teranga Gold Investor Presentation - January 2014
PDF
Eagle mtnjun13pres
PDF
Guyana Goldfields August 2017 IR Presentation
PDF
Guy august 2017 ir presentation final2
PDF
Investor presentation june 2018 final.compressed
PDF
Teranga Gold Investor Presentation - February 2014
PDF
AuRico Metals August 2016 Investor Presentation
PDF
Ami corporate update September 2017
PDF
Highbank Enters Into Non-Disclosure Agreement With Major U.S. aggregate and c...
PPTX
ERHC Energy Presentation to Shareholders
corporate_presentation
ERHC Presentation at the 8th Annual Sub-Saharan Africa Oil & Gas Conference
Teranga gold agm 2018
Savanna Energy Services Corporate Presentation September 2009
Tvi corporate presentation december 2016
Investor preso final.compressed
Asanko jv webcast preso final
Claude Resources Inc. Corporate Presentation March 2014
Lion One Metals March Presentation
Tvi pacific corporate presentation 24.06.2021 v2
Teranga Gold Investor Presentation - January 2014
Eagle mtnjun13pres
Guyana Goldfields August 2017 IR Presentation
Guy august 2017 ir presentation final2
Investor presentation june 2018 final.compressed
Teranga Gold Investor Presentation - February 2014
AuRico Metals August 2016 Investor Presentation
Ami corporate update September 2017
Highbank Enters Into Non-Disclosure Agreement With Major U.S. aggregate and c...
ERHC Energy Presentation to Shareholders
Ad

Similar to Eco-Stim Energy Solutions (NASDAQ:ESES) (20)

PDF
EcoStim Energy Solutions IR Presentation
PDF
Eco Stim Presentation Global Online Growth Conference - Oct 2016
PDF
EcoStim Energy Solutions (NASDAQ: ESES) Investor Presentation
PDF
Ecostim Energy Solutions Ogis
PDF
ECOSTIM ENERGY SOLUTIONS Corporate Presentation (NASDAQ: ESES)
PPTX
Enercom Presentation 2017
PDF
Eco Stim Presentation
PPT
Energy Exchange
PDF
2019 2022 Strategy
 
PDF
Eco-Stim Energy Solutions Presentation April 2018
PDF
13 12 05_capital_markets_day_final
PPTX
Energy Portfolio Pres
PDF
Trans Energy Inc. Investors Presentation April 15, 2013
PPT
ExxonMobil
PDF
Programa Argentina Shale Gas & Oil Summit 2015
PDF
High on Frack: Outlook for US Shale
PPTX
EnergyNet Oil & Gas Divestment Platform
PDF
AESC--This Time It's Different
PPTX
Michael bowen oil and gasoline industry
PPT
Ee pptpres30sep13
EcoStim Energy Solutions IR Presentation
Eco Stim Presentation Global Online Growth Conference - Oct 2016
EcoStim Energy Solutions (NASDAQ: ESES) Investor Presentation
Ecostim Energy Solutions Ogis
ECOSTIM ENERGY SOLUTIONS Corporate Presentation (NASDAQ: ESES)
Enercom Presentation 2017
Eco Stim Presentation
Energy Exchange
2019 2022 Strategy
 
Eco-Stim Energy Solutions Presentation April 2018
13 12 05_capital_markets_day_final
Energy Portfolio Pres
Trans Energy Inc. Investors Presentation April 15, 2013
ExxonMobil
Programa Argentina Shale Gas & Oil Summit 2015
High on Frack: Outlook for US Shale
EnergyNet Oil & Gas Divestment Platform
AESC--This Time It's Different
Michael bowen oil and gasoline industry
Ee pptpres30sep13
Ad

More from RedChip Companies, Inc. (20)

PDF
VENU Company Overview testing testing testing
PDF
Greenwich LifeSciences Presentation Feb 2025
PDF
ZOM Investor Presentations Oct 2023
PDF
Docola Presentation
PDF
INNO Holdings Presentation
PDF
EBI IR Presentation Sep 2023
PDF
ASPI Investor Deck Oct 2023
PDF
MDNA Investor Presentation May 2023
PDF
DGLY Corporate Investor Relations Deck Oct 2023
PDF
Lantern Pharma Investor Presentation Oct 2023
PDF
Sharps Investor Deck Oct 2023
PDF
Aditxt, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADTX) Presentation
PDF
1847 Holdings Corporate Presentation 1847 Holdings March 2023
PDF
Sharps Investor Presentation October 2023
PDF
SPI Investor Deck October 2023
PDF
BFRG Investor Deck September_v2
PDF
BFRG Investor Deck September
PDF
BioVie Presentation September 2023
PDF
Lantern Pharma September 8, 2023
PDF
GENE Investor Presentation Genetic Technologies August 2023
VENU Company Overview testing testing testing
Greenwich LifeSciences Presentation Feb 2025
ZOM Investor Presentations Oct 2023
Docola Presentation
INNO Holdings Presentation
EBI IR Presentation Sep 2023
ASPI Investor Deck Oct 2023
MDNA Investor Presentation May 2023
DGLY Corporate Investor Relations Deck Oct 2023
Lantern Pharma Investor Presentation Oct 2023
Sharps Investor Deck Oct 2023
Aditxt, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADTX) Presentation
1847 Holdings Corporate Presentation 1847 Holdings March 2023
Sharps Investor Presentation October 2023
SPI Investor Deck October 2023
BFRG Investor Deck September_v2
BFRG Investor Deck September
BioVie Presentation September 2023
Lantern Pharma September 8, 2023
GENE Investor Presentation Genetic Technologies August 2023

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
一比一原版(Hanze UAS毕业证)荷兰格罗宁根应用科学大学毕业证如何办理
DOCX
MLS 112 Human Anatomy and Physiology with Pathophysiology (LECTURE).docx
PDF
(DONE)Module I_2_Structure and Function of Macromolecules.pdf
PDF
Raheja CIRP Order 210825 - All Projects.pdf
DOC
拉伯克基督大学毕业证
PPTX
sadfasfasdfasdfasdfadsffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
PDF
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - August 2025
PDF
AFC Vietnam Fund Factsheet July 2025 english
PDF
AFC Uzbekistan Fund Presentation August 2025
PPTX
Prezentacja HY 2025 EN prezentacjaaa.pptx
PDF
AFC Iraq Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
PPTX
伦敦大学亚非学院硕士毕业证SOAS成绩单伦敦大学亚非学院Offer学历认证
PPTX
伦敦政治经济学院假毕业证LSE成绩单伦敦政治经济学院在读证明信学历认证
PDF
AFC Vietnam Fund Presentation - August 2025
PPTX
原版一样(SMC毕业证书)美国圣莫尼卡学院毕业证100%复刻研究生学历信息学历认证
PDF
AFC Uzbekistan Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
PDF
Mumbai c@ll girls# andheri c@ll girls# bandra Mumbai Nightlife Guide – Privat...
PDF
AFC Iraq Fund Presentation - August 2025
PDF
AFC Asia Frontier Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
PDF
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - August 2025
一比一原版(Hanze UAS毕业证)荷兰格罗宁根应用科学大学毕业证如何办理
MLS 112 Human Anatomy and Physiology with Pathophysiology (LECTURE).docx
(DONE)Module I_2_Structure and Function of Macromolecules.pdf
Raheja CIRP Order 210825 - All Projects.pdf
拉伯克基督大学毕业证
sadfasfasdfasdfasdfadsffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - August 2025
AFC Vietnam Fund Factsheet July 2025 english
AFC Uzbekistan Fund Presentation August 2025
Prezentacja HY 2025 EN prezentacjaaa.pptx
AFC Iraq Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
伦敦大学亚非学院硕士毕业证SOAS成绩单伦敦大学亚非学院Offer学历认证
伦敦政治经济学院假毕业证LSE成绩单伦敦政治经济学院在读证明信学历认证
AFC Vietnam Fund Presentation - August 2025
原版一样(SMC毕业证书)美国圣莫尼卡学院毕业证100%复刻研究生学历信息学历认证
AFC Uzbekistan Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
Mumbai c@ll girls# andheri c@ll girls# bandra Mumbai Nightlife Guide – Privat...
AFC Iraq Fund Presentation - August 2025
AFC Asia Frontier Fund (non-US) Factsheet July 2025
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - August 2025

Eco-Stim Energy Solutions (NASDAQ:ESES)

  • 1. Enercom The Oil & Gas Conference - Denver (Nasdaq: ESES)
  • 2. Disclosure This presentation contains statements about future events and expectations that can be characterized as forward-looking statements, including, in particular, statements about the Company’s plans, strategies and prospects. The use of the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. Although the Company believes that the plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, they do involve certain assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and the Company cannot assure you that those expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors described in this presentation. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. The Company cannot assure you that its future results will meet its expectations and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company or its authorized representatives. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company and persons acting on its behalf are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this paragraph and elsewhere in this presentation. The Company does not have any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this presentation or the admission document to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations about the statement or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the statement is based. 2
  • 3. Investment Highlights Technology-driven, oilfield services company building a business in fast-growing, higher-margin international shale regions ~ 80% of shale reserves located outside North America – with just 20% of global pressure pumping capacity Highly experienced and successful management team with comprehensive international oil and gas track record Early mover in one of the largest and most active international shale opportunities – Vaca Muerta in Argentina Assets, contracts and personnel in place and operating in Argentina Argentina government encouraging energy investments; expect strong growth in undersupplied market Strong financial and strategic partners with significant emerging market and geopolitical experience 3
  • 4. Technology-Driven, Emerging Growth Platform • Emerging growth, technology-driven independent oilfield service company providing: – Well stimulation; – Coiled tubing; and – Field management services • Focused on reducing the ecological impact and improving the economic performance of the well stimulation process • Assembling proven technologies and processes to: – Reduce the surface footprint, horsepower and capital cost; – Reduce emissions and methane leakage; and – Conserve fuel and water • Focused on bringing best practices and proven technologies to the most active shale resource basins outside the United States: – Initial focus on the high-quality Vaca Muerta in Argentina; and – Base Level Contract in place through 2016 – Approved as vendor for YPF; now largest customer • Funding in place to grow HHP from 10,000 to 52,000 by early 2016 Capitalize on emerging market developments and sentiment for “Eco-Friendly” unconventional solutions 4 Vaca Muerta World’s 3rd largest shale resource basin
  • 5. Seasoned Leadership Team with Highly Relevant Experience Bjarte Bruheim Chairman and Founder J. Chris Boswell President, CEO and Founder Alexander Nickolatos Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary Carlos A. Fernandez Sr. VP, Corp. Development General Mgr., Latin America Relevant Experience • 28 years experience in the oilfield service industry • 15 years experience in finance and accounting • 30+ years international management experience • 35+ years senior management experience in Latin America Bobby Chapman Chief Operating Officer • 35+ years senior management oilfield experience 5 Miguel Di Vincenzo VP, Sales & Technology Mark Stevenson VP, Marketing & Geophysics • 30+ years senior geophysical management experience • 28 years oilfield services experience in Latin America
  • 6. • Co-founded by Bjarte Bruheim in 1991; served as President until 2001 • Chris Boswell CFO from 1995-2002; directed >$3 billion in growth capital • Grew from 2 ships to 33% share of the marine seismic market by 1998 • Now has 16 marine seismic vessels, with 33 offices in 25 countries • Developed in 1995 by Bjarte Bruheim, Chris Boswell and others utilizing PGS’ seismic library as seed capital • Initially funded by Warburg Pincus • Completed $116 million IPO in 1999 • Acquired by Norsk Hydro ASA (now Statoil ASA) for $2.45 billion in 2005 • Deepwater exploration venture initially capitalized by Bjarte Bruheim and Warburg Pincus • Acquired certain electromagnetic technologies from Statoil ASA in 2004 • Completed IPO in 2007 valuing the company at ~$1.6 billion • Bjarte Bruheim named Executive Chairman of financially troubled seismic equipment designer in 2002 • Successfully arranged new investor capital to help turn around company • Sold to Rolls-Royce in 2009 for approximately $200 million • Co-founded by Bjarte Bruheim in 2009 as an E&P vehicle to utilize EMGS technology to de-risk offshore targets • Sold to Tullow Oil in 2012 for up to $672 million total consideration • Norwegian marine seismic venture co- founded by Bjarte Bruheim in 2005 • Listed on Oslo Stock Exchange in 2007 • Signed contracts for construction of 6 advanced 12-streamer 3D vessels • Acquired by Schlumberger in 2007 for $838 million in cash consideration • Co-founded by Bobby Chapman in 2005 with backing from Soros and ESS • Grew to 6 crews and 130,000 HHP by the second half of 2007 – Contracts in place for 3 additional crews at 56,000 HHP • Sold to Trican Well Service in 2007 for $256 million • In 2009, Chris Boswell was hired as CFO to re-set strategy and divest assets for a distressed silicon valley backed oilfield technology company • Mr. Boswell and Carlos Fernandez successfully farmed 5 blocks in Neuquén province of Argentina • Arranged $60 million in expansion capital from new investors in 2011, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Energy Capital Group Track Record of Consistent Success Building Profitable Energy Service Platforms 6 Five exits valued at +$4.5 billion; Three ongoing entities valued at $2+ billion
  • 7. Leading Equity Sponsors with Extensive Oilfield and Emerging Markets Expertise Bjarte Bruheim Co-Founder or Founding Shareholder of PGS, Spinnaker Exploration Company, EMGS, Eastern Echo & Spring Energy Bill Montgomery Managing Director, Quantum Energy Partners & Former head of Global Energy Practice, Goldman Sachs S. Wil Vanloh, Jr. Co-Founder & CEO, Quantum Energy Partners Steve Webster Co-Managing Partner & Co-CEO, Avista Capital Partners Robert Cabes Managing Director, White Deer Energy Experienced energy investors dominate the founding shareholder group In July 2014, the Company received $30 million in private financing from Albright Capital Management • Founded in 2005, Albright Capital Management, LLC (“ACM”) is an internationally recognized private investment firm chaired by former United States Secretary of State Madeleine Albright – $329 million in assets under management dedicated exclusively to investments in emerging markets – Extensive experience pursuing successful foreign investments and managing geopolitical risks • $33.5 million total investment in the Company – 1,333,334 shares issued at $6.00 per share in July 2014 – 173,913 shares issued at $5.75 per share in February 2015 offering – 526,315 shares issued at $4.75 per share in July 2015 – $22 million Senior secured convertible debt facility  14.0% annual coupon payable in arrears; matures in May 2018  Convertible at $6.00 per share • Currently have 3 seats on the Company’s Board of Directors 7 Underwritten offerings in 2015 have added the following large investors (over 10% holders) to the Company: - Gilder Gagnon - Bienville Capital Management - Hayman Capital (Kyle Bass)
  • 8. Eco-Stim’s recipe for a successful international shale play 1. Geology – Resource produces economic hydrocarbons 2. Pace of activity – Sufficient wells to maintain good equipment utilization 3. Demand for hydrocarbons – Production consumed locally or export potential 4. Infrastructure – Roads, housing, fuel, pipelines and support services 5. Local knowledge – Feet on the ground; local network 6. Business risk – Regulations, taxes, security, culture, ethics, etc. Top 10 Countries with Technically Recoverable Shale Gas Resources Top 10 Countries with Technically Recoverable Shale Oil Resources 802 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 (tcf) 27 0 20 40 60 80 (bboe) Source: EIA and Accenture. Approximately 75% of global shale resources lie outside the United States 8 Key Ingredients For Successful Shale Plays
  • 9. 9 Argentina’s Vaca Muerta is one of two successful international shale developments Of those nations with significant shale resources, Argentina is well-positioned to attract significant new investment in unconventional development Source: YPF, EIA, SPE. • World’s third largest resource nation of shale oil and gas • One of the fastest growing import markets for natural gas • Established pipeline and strong facility infrastructure • 100 year energy production history provides experienced oil and gas workforce • New hydrocarbon law is industry friendly • Government supported oil price of $77 per barrel • Government supported gas price of $7.50 • YPF production from Vaca Muerta nearing 45,000 BOE Vaca Muerta Barnett Haynesville Marcellus Eagle Ford Bakken TOC (%) 6 5 2 12 4 12 Thickness (m) 200 91 76 61 61 30 Depth (m) 3,000 2,286 3,658 2,057 2,287 1,829 Area (km2) 30,000 16,726 23,310 245,773 5,180 51,800 Reservoir pressure (psi) 8,000 3,525 10,800 3,375 4,502 4,200 Pressure gradient (psi/ft) 0.65-1.0 0.47 0.90 0.50 0.60 0.70 Summary Comparison of Vaca Muerta and Key U.S. Shales High-quality liquids-rich shale with established infrastructure, manageable logistics
  • 10. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Argentina Mexico Venezuela Brazil Colombia Ecuador Bolivia Peru Chile Trinidad And Tobago 2013 2014 10 Investments, rig count and number of operators are all increasing Average Rig Counts by Country Source: Baker Hughes. • Argentina is one of Latin America’s fastest-growing oil and gas exploration markets: – 20 new “shale” drilling rigs moved to Argentina over last 18 months; highest rig count in many years • YPF is expected to spend $37 billion over five years: – JV partners: Chevron, Dow Chemical, Petrola Pampa, Petronas, Sinopec and most recently Gazprom – ExxonMobil, Shell, CNOOC, Pluspetrol, Petrobras, Total, and Tecpetrol also maintain substantial drilling budgets Domestic operators under extreme pressure from the government to drill and produce hydrocarbons 24% E&P Companies Operating in Argentina
  • 11. 11 Strong Demand, High Imports, Lack of Dollars, Big Resource and New President • Argentina has pressing need for increased production: – Energy deficit driven by underinvestment – Consumption began to exceed production in 2009 – Importing substantial portion of daily consumption • Domestic price controls shielding market from global oil plunge: – Lack of dollars available to buy imported oil – Domestic oil and gas prices near highest levels on record • New Federal Hydrocarbon Law sets nationwide rules and incentives to provide greater certainty for foreign operators – Lower investment thresholds to qualify for export tax exemptions – Provincial royalties capped at 12% – Holding period for concessions extended to 35 years – Elimination of certain import restrictions on drilling equipment Source: EIA. Argentina has approved reforms aimed at attracting foreign shale investment to erase costly energy deficit 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Bcf Argentina’s Dry Natural Gas Production & Consumption 1990-2013 Source: EIA. Production Consumption Net Trade Depression and financial crisis Argentina’s Natural Gas Imports and Exports -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Bcf Imports Exports
  • 12. 12 WTI Oil Price August 2015 = $45/barrel Average Argentina Basket Oil Price for Q2 2015 = $69/barrel Henry Hub Natural Gas Price in March 2015 = $2.80/mcf YPF’s Disclosed Average Natural Gas Price for Q2 2015 = $4.58/mcf $42 $42 $66 $69 $1.50 $2.50 $5.00 $4.58 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2005 2010 2012 2015 Argentina Commodity Price Development Oil Price Gas Price Commodity Prices in Argentina are set by the Government
  • 13. $350,000 $97,000 $92,000 $87,500 $86,000 Argentina Eagle Ford Marcellus Bakken Permian Barriers to Entry and Lack of Sufficient Stimulation Equipment Drive Pricing Power Barriers to Entry: • Importation of new stimulation equipment has been limited • Any new equipment into country must be negotiated with at least 3 agencies (Ministry of Industry, Department of Trade, and Customs Office) • Matching agreements need to be negotiated with local vendors • Government typically favors protectionist policies • Perception of challenging repatriation 13 While North America holds an estimated 15% of worldwide shale reserves, it has about 80% of global pressure pumping capacity AverageRevenueperStage $600,000 - $750,000 (depending on service provided) * * * * * Management believes all prices in all U.S. basins have been reduced 30-35% in 2015 from these 2014 levels
  • 14. Actual Eagle Ford VS Predicted Vaca Muerta - Drilling Rigs and Stimulation Fleets 4 160 265 220 1 50 87 75 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2008 2010 2012 2014 % of Drilling Rigs # of Stimulation Fleets 20 35 85 135 200 220 3 10 27 45 65 75 0 50 100 150 200 250 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 % of Drilling Rigs # of Stimulation Fleets Eagle Ford play in Texas - 4 rigs & 1 Frac crew operating in 2008 Vaca Muerta play in Argentina - 30 rigs & 7 modern Frac crews operating in mid-2014 14Source: Management research; Simmons & Co
  • 15. 15 Argentina Market Segmentation – ESES expanding to all three market segments Argentina Well Stimulation Market Capex from the proceeds of the July 2015 equity offering will give the Company an opportunity to participate in all three markets 32% Tight Gas 35% Unconventional 29% Other 4% Eco-Stim 33% Conventional
  • 16. 16 Illustrative Per Fleet Fully Deployed HHP Build Up Through Projected Fleet Additions Impact of Fleet Additions on Hydraulic Horsepower Unconventional Fleet #1 Targeting operation in 3Q16; Argentina Conventional Fleet #1 Currently operating; Argentina Tight Gas Unit #1 Targeting operation 4Q15; Argentina HHP in reserve to be deployed as needed 10,000 16,000 52,000 27,000 79,000 27,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 HydraulicHorsepower Available HHP Total HHP
  • 17. 17 Multiple Benefits of TPUs Multi-Fuel Capabilities • Designed to run on field gas, LNG, CNG, Diesel or bi-fuel • No loss in efficiency and horsepower Lower Emissions • Lower emissions than conventional diesel engines • ~60% below Tier IV standards for NOx and CO • No methane slippage issues compared to diesel or bi-fuel Smaller Footprint • Single unit trailer with twice the horsepower as conventional engines • Uniquely outfitted with twin triplex pumps Fuel Savings • Total annual savings opportunity of nearly $10 million compared to a traditional diesel fleet Purchased at Significant Discount • Purchased 54,000 HHP of the latest generation turbine-powered pressure pumping units at 80% discount to replacement cost Multiple benefits over conventional diesel-powered well stimulation equipment Comparison of Physical Footprint Unique clean turbine pumping technology with proven capability to operate in unconventional shale regions Latest generation turbine-powered pressure pumping unit (4,500 HP) Conventional diesel-powered pump (1,800-2,500 HP)
  • 18. 18 Illustrative Market Economics for New Argentina Equipment Illustrative Run-Rate Field Level Cash Flow for Comparable Equipment* Conventional & Tight Gas Pumping Fleets Unconventional Fleet *For illustrative purposes only based on industry observations of peer companies. Note: Does not reflect general administrative and corporate overhead expenses. Coiled Tubing Unit Stages per Month Stages per Month Number of Jobs per Month 8 to 12 Average Price per Stage Average Price per Stage Average Revenue per Job $65,000 to $70,000 Average Monthly Revenue Average Revenue per Job Average Monthly Revenue Average Monthly Operating Cost Average Operating Cost per Job Average Monthly Operating Cost Average Monthly Gross Margin Average Gross Margin per Job Average Monthly Gross Margin Gross Margin (%) Gross Margin (%) Gross Margin (%) Total Investment ($MM) Total Investment ($MM) Total Investment ($MM) Gross Margin Payback Period Gross Margin Payback Period Gross Margin Payback Period 12 25 $13.5 19 months $600,000 $15,000,000 $9,000,000 $6,000,000 40% $27.0 $150,000 $1,800,000 $1,080,000 $720,000 40% 5 months $620,000 $372,000 $248,000 40% $6.5 26 months
  • 19. According to Welling & Co, the primary reason for poor performing shale wells is the lack of subsurface understanding 19
  • 20. Due to low understanding of the subsurface & currently low oil prices, 80% of unconventional wells are “uneconomic” Source: IHS 80% not economic to produce 20% are good wells 20
  • 21. Once subsurface is understood, sweet spots can be located. Note that almost 90% of all production comes from a few wells “Hogs” and “Large” wells account for almost 90% of new production 21 Source: IHS
  • 22. 22 Technology Platform to Identify Sweet Spots and “Ground Truth” • Leverages fiber-optic technology and predictive modeling (how many stages don’t actually produce hydrocarbons?) • Enables Eco-Stim to efficiently predict stimulation effectiveness and understand the shale in real-time 1. Predict 3. Measure 4. Evaluate Prediction Proprietary process to efficiently predict “sweet spots” in shale plays Stimulate all planned stages as designed Downhole technologies to determine which stages are actually producing Compare prediction of sweet spots to actual production “Learn” best producing areas of the formation in a given area and incorporate information into next geophysical prediction 5. Update Model 2. Execute Predict, Execute, Measure, Evaluate, Re-Predict Eco-Stim conducts its horizontal stimulation services within a systematic methodology
  • 23. Example of “Sweet Spot” Prediction Mud logs on this horizontal well show flare markers that confirm predictive fracture maps 30 Ft Flare 7610 5 Ft Flare 7970 5 Ft Flare 8630 5 Ft Flare 8742 3 Ft Flare 9659 4 Ft Flare 10480 4 Ft Flare 11305 Mud Log Fracture Flare Gas - + • Using proprietary technology for accurate well placement and stimulation stage planning • Maps produced in less than three weeks at minimal cost • Over 350 shale projects completed in U.S. shale plays • Over 25 projects completed in Argentina Curvature Attributes • Flares correlate with Geo-Predict sweet spot mapping – confirming the effectiveness of Geo-Predict’s methodology 23 Mud logs on this horizontal well show flare markers that confirm predictive fracture maps
  • 24. Confirmation of Producing Zones….. (It is generally accepted in the industry that only one of three stages actually produce) … Derived from Fiber Optic Acoustic Signatures TIME Gas Production from zone 6 Gas + Water Production from zone 8 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 18 24
  • 25. 5.3 1.2 Conventional Geopredict Once confidence is built in predictive techniques, substantial cost savings can be achieved 7x 70k 30x 70k $1.6 million in savings Reduction in Stimulation Zones Cost Comparison ($Millions) Fiber optic distributed acoustic data confirms production in 5 of the 7 predicted sweet spots – 71% accuracy By utilizing GeoPredict the number of stimulation zones can be reduced – $1.6 million in reduced cost when going from 30 to 7 stimulations each priced at $70,000 $2.1 $.490 Result of “Smart” stimulation process is to concentrate stages in those areas with the highest probability of production thus reducing cost and increasing recovery rate Jobs executed with 30 zones stimulated ConventionalFieldManagement 25 7 predicted zones to stimulate from GeoPredict Fiber optics sensing confirming sweet spots
  • 26. In new shale plays, technology advances can accelerate learning curve and focus efforts in high probability regions Early Maps Of Eagle Ford Play in Texas - 2009 Well Drilled in Eagle Ford to Identify “Sweet Spots” and to “hold” acreage 2008-2012 Best producing areas within Eagle Ford play - 2013 Five Years and Billions of Dollars 26 Source: EIA
  • 27. Eagle Ford “Hogs” after years of Drilling; Clearly certain areas produce better than other areas; formation is not homogeneous 27
  • 28. LCav.e-6 Upper Resistivity Zone EcoStim Field Management System (Example from Permian Basin) Real-Time Fiber-Optic Data Recorded on Vertical Appraisal Well with 18 Stages Stage 11 Stage 12 Stage 13 Stage 14 Stage 15 Stage 16 Stage 17 Stage 18 Stage 2 Stage 4 Stage 3 Stage 1 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8 Stage 9 Stage 10 Correlates with most prolific production zones Correlates with most prolific production zones 28 Proprietary Geo-Predict Results Show Correlation w/ Best Zones
  • 29. Upper Resistivity Zone Production All Wells-Acoustic Impedance GeoPredictSM searches out reoccurrence of key attributes to provide guidance as to “Sweet Spots” in new shale plays Attributes observed in monitored zones can be projected out to surrounding region (not actual results of study) 29 Neuqen City
  • 30. EcoStim – 30% Sequential Revenue Growth 30 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Revenue Revenue
  • 31. EcoStim – Capital Structure 31 9% 15% 36% 40% Shares Outstanding - 13.5M Employees & Founders ACM Argentina Strategic Investors Public Float 12% 31% 26% 31% Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding - 18.2M Employees & Founders ACM Argentina Strategic Investors Public Float
  • 32. EcoStim – Capital Efficiency Description Amount Total Capital Secured Since Inception $75 million Total HHP Deployed When Current Capacity Is Fully Operational 80,000 HHP Average Cost Per HHP Deployed $940 Average Cost Per HHP For Industry $1,000 32 In summary, we started a company from scratch, hired a team, developed a customer base over a three year period, evaluated & acquired IP, licensed technology, imported equipment and started an operation; AND bought equipment, ALL for a grand total of $940 per HHP.
  • 33. Pro Forma Balance Sheet 33 June 30, 2015 Pro Forma Adjustments Pro Forma Balance Sheet June 30, 2015 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,593,271 $ 27,373,591 A $ 30,966,862 Other current assets 9,940,447 - 9,940,447 Total current assets 13,533,718 27,373,591 40,907,309 Total non-current assets 28,564,976 - 28,564,976 Total assets $ 42,098,694 $ 27,373,591 $ 69,472,285 Liabilities and stockholders' equity Total current liabilities 11,468,904 (2,485,163) B 8,983,741 Total non-current liabilities 23,805,857 - 23,805,857 Total liabilities 35,274,761 (2,485,163) 32,789,598 Total stockholders' equity 6,823,933 29,858,754 36,682,687 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 42,098,694 $ 27,373,591 $ 69,472,285 A Relates to July 15, 2015 equity raise whereby Company issued 6,164,690 shares of common stock at $4.75 per share B Relates to July 15, 2015 ACM interest payable conversion to common stock at a price of $4.75 per share
  • 34. Investment Highlights Technology-driven, oilfield services company with the goal of building a business in fast-growing, higher-margin international shale regions ~ 80% of shale reserves located outside North America – with just 20% of global pressure pumping capacity Highly experienced and successful management team with comprehensive international oil and gas track record Early mover in one of the largest and most active international shale opportunities – Vaca Muerta, Argentina Assets, contracts and personnel in place and operating in target market Argentina Gov. price support encourages energy investment; expect strong growth in undersupplied market Strong financial and strategic partner with significant emerging market and geopolitical experience 34