SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
359
Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Space
using Implicit Relation
Kamal Wadhwa1
, Rashmi Tiwari2
and Ved Prakash Bhardwaj3
1, 2, 3
Govt. Narmada Mahavidyalaya Hoshangabad (M.P.)
Abstract
The present paper deals with proving some common fixed point results in a fuzzy metric space using Implicit
Relation.
Index Terms: Fixed point, fuzzy metric space, occasionally weakly compatible mappings, t-norm, Implicit
Relation.
I. Introduction
It proved a turning point in the development of fuzzy mathematics when the notion of fuzzy set was introduced
by Zadeh [12] in 1965. Following the concept of fuzzy sets, fuzzy metric spaces have been introduced by
Kramosil and Michalek [15] and George and Veeramani [2] modified the notion of fuzzy metric spaces with the
help of continuous t-norm, which shows a new way for further development of analysis in such spaces.
Consequently in due course of time some metric fixed points results were generalized to fuzzy metric spaces by
various authors. Sessa [20] improved commutativity condition in fixed point theorem by introducing the notion
of weakly commuting maps in metric space. Vasuki [20] proved fixed point theorems for R-weakly commuting
mapping. Pant [18, 19] introduced the new concept of reciprocally continuous mappings and established some
common fixed point theorems. The concept of compatible maps by [15] and weakly compatible maps by [9] in
fuzzy metric space is generalized by A.Al Thagafi and Naseer Shahzad [1] by introducing the concept of
occasionally weakly compatible mappings.
In this paper we give a fixed point theorem on fuzzy metric space with an implicit relation defined in [14]. Our
results extend and generalize the result of Wadhwa and Dubey [11] using Chouhan, Khanduja and Singh [14].
We start with some preliminaries:
II. Preliminaries
Definition 2.1 [4]: A binary operation *: [0, 1] × [0, 1]→[0, 1] is continuous t-norm if satisfies the following
conditions:
(1) * is commutative and associative,
(2) * is continuous,
(3) a*1 = a for all a є [0, 1],
(4) a*b ≤ c*d whenever a ≤ c and b ≤ d for all a, b, c, d є [0, 1].
Examples of t- norm are a*b = min {a, b} and a*b = ab.
Definition 2.2 [2]: A 3-tuple (X, M, *) is said to be a fuzzy metric space if X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous
t-norm and M is a fuzzy set on X2
× [0, ∞) satisfying the following conditions: (The functions M(x, y, t) denote
the degree of nearness between x and y with respect to t, respectively.)
1) M(x, y, 0) = 0 for all x, y ∈ X
2) M(x, y, t) = 1 for all x, y ∈ X and t>0 if and only if x = y
3) M(x, y, t) = M(y, x, t) for all x, y ∈ X and t>0
4) M(x, y, t)*M(y, z, s) ≤ M(x, z, t+s) for all x, y, z ∈ X and t, s > 0
5) For all x, y ∈ X, M(x, y, .) : [0, ∞) → [0, 1] is left continuous.
Remark 2.1: In a FM M(X, M, *), M(x, y, .) is non- decreasing for all x.
Example 2.3 (Induced fuzzy metric [2]): – Let (X, d) be a metric space. Denote a*b =ab for all a, b∈[0, 1] and
let
Md be fuzzy sets on X2
× [0, ∞) defined as follows:
Md (x, y, t) =
( , )
Then (X, Md,*) is a fuzzy metric space. We call this fuzzy metric induced by a metric d as the standard
intuitionistic fuzzy metric.
Definition 2.4: Let M(X, M, *) be a FM - space. Then
(i) A sequence{xn} in X is said to be Cauchy Sequence if for all t>0 and p>0
lim →∞ ( xn+p, xn, t) = 1
(ii) A sequence {xn} in X is said to be convergent to a point x ∈ X if for all t>0,
lim →∞ ( xn, x, t) = 1
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
360
Since * is continuous, the limit is uniquely determined from (5) and (11) respectively.
Definition 2.5: A FM-Space M(X, M, *) is said to be complete if and only if every Cauchy sequence in X is
convergent.
Definition 2.6: Let A and S be maps from a fuzzy metric M(X, M, *) into itself. The maps A and S are said to be
weakly commuting if M( ASz, SAz, t) ≥ M( Az, Sz, t) for all z ∈ X and t>0
Definition 2.7 [10]: Let f and g be maps from an FM-space M(X, M, *) into itself .The maps f and g are said to
be compatible if for all t>0, lim →∞ ( fgxn, gfxn, t) = 1 whenever {xn} is a sequence in X such that
lim →∞ fxn = lim →∞ gxn = z for some z ∈ X.
Definition 2.8: Two mappings A and S of a fuzzy metric space M(X, M, *) will be called reciprocally
continuous if ASun→Az and SAun→Sz, whenever {un} is a sequence such that for some Aun, Sun→z for some z
∈ X.
Definition 2.9: Let M(X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. f and g be self maps on X. A point x in X is called a
coincidence point of f and g iff fx =gx. In this case w = fx =g x is called a point of coincidence of f and g.
Definition 2.10[8]: A pair of maps S and T is called weakly compatible pair if they commute at the coincident
points i.e., if Su = Tu for some u in X then STu = TSu.
Definition 2.11[1]: Two self maps f and g of a set X are called occasionally weakly compatible (owc) iff there is
a point x in X which is coincidence point of f and g at which f and g commute.
Example 2.11.1[1]: Let R be the usual metric space. Define S, T: R→R by Sx=2x and Tx=x2
for all x∈R. Then
Sx=Tx for x=0, 2, but ST0=TS0, and ST2≠TS2. S and T are occasionally weakly compatible self maps but not
weakly compatible.
Definition 2.12 (Implicit Relation)[14]: Let φ5 be the set of all real and continuous function φ : (R+
)5
→R and
such that
2.12 (i) φ non increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument and
2.12 (ii) for u, v ≥0, φ(u,v,v,v,v)≥0 ⇒ u ≥ v
Example: φ(t1, t2, t3, t4, t5) = t1 – max {t1, t2, t3, t4}.
Lemma 2.1: Let {un} be a sequence in a fuzzy metric space M(X, M, *). If there exist a constant k ∈ (0, 1) such
that
M( un, un+1, kt) ≥ M(un-1, un, t) for all t>0 and n = 1 , 2 , 3….. Then {un} is a Cauchy sequence in X.
Lemma 2.2: Let M(X, M, *) be a FM space and for all x, y ∈ X, t>0 and if for a number q ∈ (0, 1),
M( x, y, qt) ≥ M(x, y, t) then x = y.
Lemma 2.3[9]: Let X be a set, f and g be owc self maps of X. If f and g have a unique point of coincidence,
w = fx = gx, then w is the unique common fixed point of f and g.
3. Main Result
Theorem 3.1: Let M(X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let A, B, S and T be self mappings of X.
Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc. If for φ∈φ5 there exist q ∈ (0, 1) such that
φ
M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t),
, !,") # ($!,% ,")&
#
,
' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")&
' (
,
)
* ( ,% ,")
* ($!, !,")
+ . )
( , !,") ($!,% ,")
-
+
. ≥ 0 ……………….. (1)
for all x, y ∈ X and t>0, and a,b,c,d≥0 with a&b and c&d cannot be simultaneously 0 , there exist a unique point
w ∈ X such that Aw = Sw = w and a unique point z ∈ X such that Bz = Tz = z. Morever z = w, so that there is a
unique common fixed point of A, B, S and T.
Proof: Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc, so there are points x, y ∈ X such that Ax = Sx and By = Ty. We
claim that Ax = By. If not by inequality (1)
φ
M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t),
, !,") # ($!,% ,")&
#
,
' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")&
' (
,
)
* ( ,% ,")
* ($!, !,")
+ . )
( , !,") ($!,% ,")
-
+
. ≥ 0
φ
M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, Ax, t),
,$!,") # ($!, ,")&
#
,
' , ,") ( ($!,$!,")&
' (
,
)
* ( , ,")
* ($!,$!,")
+ . )
( ,$!,") ($!, ,")
-
+
. ≥ 0
φ M(Ax, By, qt), 1, M(Ax, By, t), 1, M(Ax, By, t)& ≥ 0
φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t)& ≥ 0
Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument therefore by 2.12 (i) and 2.12 (ii)
M(Ax, By, qt) ≥ M(Ax, By, t)
Therefore Ax = By i.e. Ax = Sx = By =Ty.
Suppose that there is a unique point z such that Az = Sz then by (1) we have
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
361
φ
M(Az, By, qt), M(Sz, Az, t),
2, !,") # ($!,%2,")&
#
,
' %2, 2,") ( ($!, !,")&
' (
,
)
* ( 2,%2,")
* ($!, !,")
+ . )
( 2, !,") ($!,%2,")
-
+
. ≥ 0
φ M(Az, By, qt), 1, M(Az, By, t), 1, M(Az, By, t)& ≥ 0
φ M(Az, By, qt), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t)& ≥ 0
Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument therefore 2.12 (i) and 2.12 (ii)
M(Az, By, qt) ≥ M(Az, By, t)
Az = By = Sz =Ty, So Ax = Az and w = Ax = Sx the unique point of coincidence of A and S. By lemma (2.3) w
is the only common fixed point of A and S. Similarly there is a unique point z ∈ X such that z = Bz =Tz.
Assume that w ≠ z we have
φ
M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(Sw, Aw, t),
4, 2,") # ($2,%4,")&
#
,
' %4, 4,") ( ($2, 2,")&
' (
,
)
* ( 4,%4,")
* ($2, 2,")
+ . )
( 4, 2,") ($2,%4,")
-
+
. ≥ 0
φ
M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, w, t),
4,2,") # (2,4,")&
#
,
' 4,4,") ( (2,2,")&
' (
,
)
* (4,4,")
* (2,2,")
+ . )
(4,2,") (2,4,")
-
+
. ≥ 0
φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, w, t) , M(w, z, t), 1, M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0
φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), 1, M(w, z, t), 1, M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0
φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, z, t) , M(w, z, t), M(w, z, t), M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0
Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument
M(Aw, Bz, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t)
Since, w is the only common fixed point of A and we have z = Bz.
M(Aw, Bz, qt) = M(w, z, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t)
We have M(w, z, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t)
Hence z = w by Lemma (2.2) and z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point
holds from (1).
Definition 3.11 (Implicit Relation) [14]: Let φ6 be the set of all real and continuous function φ : (R+
)6
→R and
such that
3.11 (i) φ non increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument and
3.11 (ii) for u, v ≥0, φ(u,v,v,v,v,v)≥0 ⇒ u ≥ v
Theorem 3.2: Let M(X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let A, B, S and T be self mappings of X.
Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc. If for φ∈φ6 there exist q ∈ (0, 1) such that
φ
M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t),
, !,") # ($!,% ,")&
#
,
' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")&
' (
,
)
* ( ,% ,")
* ($!, !,")
+ . )
( , !,") ($!,% ,")
-
+ , M(By, Sx, t)
. ≥ 0 ……………….. (2)
for all x, y ∈ X and t>0, and a,b,c,d≥0 with a&b and c&d cannot be simultaneously 0 , there exist a unique point
w ∈ X such that Aw = Sw = w and a unique point z ∈ X such that Bz = Tz = z. Morever z = w, so that there is a
unique common fixed point of A, B, S and T.
Proof: Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc, so there are points x, y ∈ X such that Ax = Sx and By = Ty. We
claim that Ax = By. If not by inequality (2)
φ
M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, Ax, t),
,$!,") # ($!, ,")&
#
,
' , ,") ( ($!,$!,")&
' (
,
)
* ( , ,")
* ($!,$!,")
+ . )
( ,$!,") ($!, ,")
-
+ , M(By, Ax, t)
. ≥ 0
φ(M(Ax, By, qt), 1, M(Ax, By, t), 1, M(Ax, By, t), M(By, Ax, t)) ≥ 0
φ(M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(By, Ax, t)) ≥ 0
Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd
and 4th
argument therefore 3.11 (i) and 3.11 (ii)
M(Ax, By, qt) ≥ M(Ax, By, t)
Therefore Ax = By i.e. Ax = Sx = By = Ty. Suppose that there is another point z such that A z =S z then by (2)
we have A z = S z = Ty, So Ax = A z and w =Ax = Tx is the unique point of coincidence of A and T. By lemma
(2.2) w is a unique point z ∈ X such that w = Bz = Tz. Thus z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The
uniqueness of fixed point holds by (2).
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
362
References:
[1]. A.Al -Thagafi and Naseer Shahzad, “Generalized I-Nonexpansive Selfmaps and Invariant Approximation”,
Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series May, 2008, Vol.24, No.5, pp.867876.
[2]. A. George, P.Veeramani, “On some results in Fuzzy Metric Spaces”, Fuzzy Sets and System, 64 (1994),
395-399. [3]. Brog, “M.A. metric space in Fuzzy Set Theory “, J. Math. And Appl., 69, 205-230 (1979).
[4]. B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, “Statistical metric spaces”, Pacific J. Math. 10(1960), 313-334
[5]. C.T. Aage, J.N.Salunke,”On fixed point theorem in Fuzzy Metric Spaces” Int. J. Open Problem Compt.
Math.,Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2010 ,pp 123-131.
[6]. C.T. Aage, J.N.Salunke,”On fixed point theorem in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using a Control Function”,
Submitted.
[7]. G. Jungck,”Compatible Mappings and Common Fixed Point”, International Journal of Math. Sci. 9 (1986),
771-779.
[8]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades, ” Fixed Point for Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mappings” , Fixed Point
Theory, Volume 7, No. 2 ,2006, 287-296.
[9]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades, ” Fixed Point for Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mappings” , Erratum,
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 9, No. 1,2008,383-384.
[10]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades,”Fixed Point for Set Valued functions without Continuity”, Indian J. Pure
Appl. Math., 29(3), (1998), pp.771- 779.
[11]. K. Wadhwa and H. Dubey, “On Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Spaces”.
Imacst, volume 2 number 1 may 2011, 5-8.
[12]. L.A. Zadeh,” Fuzzy sets”, Inform and Control 8 (1965), 338-353.
[13]. M. Grabiec, “Fixed Points in Fuzzy metric Spaces”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 27 (1988), 385-389.
[14]. M.S. Chauhan, M.K. Khanduja and B. Singh, “Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space by Using New
Implicit Relation”. Ijes, volume-1, 2012, 192-195.
[15]. O.Kramosil and J.Michalek, “Fuzzy Metric and statistical metric spaces”, Kybernetika, 11 (1975), 326-334.
[16]. P.Balasubramaniam, S. muralisankar, R.P. Pant, “Common fixed points of four mappings in a fuzzy metric
space”, J. Fuzzy Math. 10(2) (2002), 379-384.
[17]. R. K. Mishra and S. Choudhary,”On fixed point theorems in Fuzzy metric spaces”, IMACST Vol.1, No.1,
Dec 2010, 45-47.
[18]. R.P. Pant, “A remark on Common fixed point of Four Mappings in a fuzzy metric space”, J. Fuzzy. Math.
12(2) (2004), 433-437.
[19]. R.P. Pant, “Common fixed point Theorems for contractive Mappings”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 226 (1998),
251-258.
[20]. S. Sessa,” on a weak commutative condition in fixed point consideration “’, Publ. Inst. Math (Beograd),
23(46) (1982), 146-153.
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/
The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
inventionjournals
 
PDF
Common fixed point theorem for occasionally weakly compatible mapping in q fu...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
B043007014
inventy
 
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
eSAT Publishing House
 
PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Common Fixed Point Theorems For Occasionally Weakely Compatible Mappings
iosrjce
 
PDF
A Common Fixed Point Theorem on Fuzzy Metric Space Using Weakly Compatible an...
inventionjournals
 
PDF
8 fixed point theorem in complete fuzzy metric space 8 megha shrivastava
BIOLOGICAL FORUM
 
PDF
41-50
Anita Gupta
 
PDF
Fixed point result in probabilistic metric space
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
IJERA Editor
 
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
inventionjournals
 
PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Hk3114251433
IJERA Editor
 
PDF
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem of Compatible of Type (R) Using Implicit Relation in Fuzz...
IRJET Journal
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
inventionjournals
 
Common fixed point theorem for occasionally weakly compatible mapping in q fu...
Alexander Decker
 
B043007014
inventy
 
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
eSAT Publishing House
 
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
Alexander Decker
 
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
Alexander Decker
 
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...
Alexander Decker
 
Common Fixed Point Theorems For Occasionally Weakely Compatible Mappings
iosrjce
 
A Common Fixed Point Theorem on Fuzzy Metric Space Using Weakly Compatible an...
inventionjournals
 
8 fixed point theorem in complete fuzzy metric space 8 megha shrivastava
BIOLOGICAL FORUM
 
Fixed point result in probabilistic metric space
Alexander Decker
 
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
IJERA Editor
 
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
inventionjournals
 
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
Alexander Decker
 
Hk3114251433
IJERA Editor
 
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Alexander Decker
 
Fixed Point Theorem of Compatible of Type (R) Using Implicit Relation in Fuzz...
IRJET Journal
 

Viewers also liked (12)

PPTX
Presentacion grupo9
Jhenyfer Huanca Ticona
 
PPT
Application of the creative process to successful research, development, and ...
Sunburst Trout Company
 
PDF
referenciaimovel.com.br Casa em Itaipuaçu Cod 202
Referenciaimovel
 
PPTX
The science of culture
Hande Işık Tosun
 
PPTX
Retail management
Aditya Swaminathan
 
PPTX
Čachtický hrad
Jana Kürtiová
 
DOCX
Goodfellas
laurencooney2497
 
PDF
MORE THAN IMPOSSIBLE: NEGATIVE AND COMPLEX PROBABILITIES AND THEIR INTERPRETA...
Vasil Penchev
 
PDF
Cornelia Miller resume 1
Nelia Miller
 
DOC
Sunny
Sunny Bansal
 
PDF
Daniel Jezini - Processo Licitatório para TI e TIC
Brasscom
 
PDF
Fernando Martins - Inovação e Internet das Coisas
Brasscom
 
Presentacion grupo9
Jhenyfer Huanca Ticona
 
Application of the creative process to successful research, development, and ...
Sunburst Trout Company
 
referenciaimovel.com.br Casa em Itaipuaçu Cod 202
Referenciaimovel
 
The science of culture
Hande Işık Tosun
 
Retail management
Aditya Swaminathan
 
Čachtický hrad
Jana Kürtiová
 
Goodfellas
laurencooney2497
 
MORE THAN IMPOSSIBLE: NEGATIVE AND COMPLEX PROBABILITIES AND THEIR INTERPRETA...
Vasil Penchev
 
Cornelia Miller resume 1
Nelia Miller
 
Daniel Jezini - Processo Licitatório para TI e TIC
Brasscom
 
Fernando Martins - Inovação e Internet das Coisas
Brasscom
 
Ad

Similar to Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit relation (16)

PDF
B043007014
inventy
 
PDF
B043007014
inventy
 
PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Some Common Fixed Point Theorems for Multivalued Mappings in Two Metric Spaces
IJMER
 
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
eSAT Journals
 
PDF
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
mathsjournal
 
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
PDF
Fixed point theorems in random fuzzy metric space through
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A unique common fixed point theorem for four
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
Common fixed point theorems of integral type in menger pm spaces
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
B043007014
inventy
 
B043007014
inventy
 
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces
Alexander Decker
 
Some Common Fixed Point Theorems for Multivalued Mappings in Two Metric Spaces
IJMER
 
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
eSAT Journals
 
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
mathsjournal
 
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
Fixed point theorems in random fuzzy metric space through
Alexander Decker
 
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
Alexander Decker
 
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
Alexander Decker
 
A unique common fixed point theorem for four
Alexander Decker
 
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
Alexander Decker
 
Common fixed point theorems of integral type in menger pm spaces
Alexander Decker
 
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
mathsjournal
 
Ad

More from Alexander Decker (20)

PDF
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey of provenance leveraged
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
Alexander Decker
 
PDF
A study to measures the financial health of
Alexander Decker
 
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Alexander Decker
 
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
Alexander Decker
 
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
Alexander Decker
 
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
Alexander Decker
 
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
Alexander Decker
 
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
Alexander Decker
 
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
Alexander Decker
 
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
Alexander Decker
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
Alexander Decker
 
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
Alexander Decker
 
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
Alexander Decker
 
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
Alexander Decker
 
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
Alexander Decker
 
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
Alexander Decker
 
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
Alexander Decker
 
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
Alexander Decker
 
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
Alexander Decker
 
A survey of provenance leveraged
Alexander Decker
 
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
Alexander Decker
 
A study to measures the financial health of
Alexander Decker
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Newgen Beyond Frankenstein_Build vs Buy_Digital_version.pdf
darshakparmar
 
DOCX
Cryptography Quiz: test your knowledge of this important security concept.
Rajni Bhardwaj Grover
 
PPTX
Agentforce World Tour Toronto '25 - MCP with MuleSoft
Alexandra N. Martinez
 
PDF
POV_ Why Enterprises Need to Find Value in ZERO.pdf
darshakparmar
 
PDF
How do you fast track Agentic automation use cases discovery?
DianaGray10
 
PDF
The 2025 InfraRed Report - Redpoint Ventures
Razin Mustafiz
 
PPTX
Future Tech Innovations 2025 – A TechLists Insight
TechLists
 
PPTX
AI Penetration Testing Essentials: A Cybersecurity Guide for 2025
defencerabbit Team
 
PDF
[Newgen] NewgenONE Marvin Brochure 1.pdf
darshakparmar
 
PPT
Ericsson LTE presentation SEMINAR 2010.ppt
npat3
 
PPTX
Agentforce World Tour Toronto '25 - Supercharge MuleSoft Development with Mod...
Alexandra N. Martinez
 
PDF
Bitcoin for Millennials podcast with Bram, Power Laws of Bitcoin
Stephen Perrenod
 
PDF
Kit-Works Team Study_20250627_한달만에만든사내서비스키링(양다윗).pdf
Wonjun Hwang
 
PDF
Transforming Utility Networks: Large-scale Data Migrations with FME
Safe Software
 
PDF
“Voice Interfaces on a Budget: Building Real-time Speech Recognition on Low-c...
Edge AI and Vision Alliance
 
PPTX
From Sci-Fi to Reality: Exploring AI Evolution
Svetlana Meissner
 
PDF
The Rise of AI and IoT in Mobile App Tech.pdf
IMG Global Infotech
 
PPTX
New ThousandEyes Product Innovations: Cisco Live June 2025
ThousandEyes
 
PDF
“NPU IP Hardware Shaped Through Software and Use-case Analysis,” a Presentati...
Edge AI and Vision Alliance
 
PDF
CIFDAQ Market Wrap for the week of 4th July 2025
CIFDAQ
 
Newgen Beyond Frankenstein_Build vs Buy_Digital_version.pdf
darshakparmar
 
Cryptography Quiz: test your knowledge of this important security concept.
Rajni Bhardwaj Grover
 
Agentforce World Tour Toronto '25 - MCP with MuleSoft
Alexandra N. Martinez
 
POV_ Why Enterprises Need to Find Value in ZERO.pdf
darshakparmar
 
How do you fast track Agentic automation use cases discovery?
DianaGray10
 
The 2025 InfraRed Report - Redpoint Ventures
Razin Mustafiz
 
Future Tech Innovations 2025 – A TechLists Insight
TechLists
 
AI Penetration Testing Essentials: A Cybersecurity Guide for 2025
defencerabbit Team
 
[Newgen] NewgenONE Marvin Brochure 1.pdf
darshakparmar
 
Ericsson LTE presentation SEMINAR 2010.ppt
npat3
 
Agentforce World Tour Toronto '25 - Supercharge MuleSoft Development with Mod...
Alexandra N. Martinez
 
Bitcoin for Millennials podcast with Bram, Power Laws of Bitcoin
Stephen Perrenod
 
Kit-Works Team Study_20250627_한달만에만든사내서비스키링(양다윗).pdf
Wonjun Hwang
 
Transforming Utility Networks: Large-scale Data Migrations with FME
Safe Software
 
“Voice Interfaces on a Budget: Building Real-time Speech Recognition on Low-c...
Edge AI and Vision Alliance
 
From Sci-Fi to Reality: Exploring AI Evolution
Svetlana Meissner
 
The Rise of AI and IoT in Mobile App Tech.pdf
IMG Global Infotech
 
New ThousandEyes Product Innovations: Cisco Live June 2025
ThousandEyes
 
“NPU IP Hardware Shaped Through Software and Use-case Analysis,” a Presentati...
Edge AI and Vision Alliance
 
CIFDAQ Market Wrap for the week of 4th July 2025
CIFDAQ
 

Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit relation

  • 1. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 359 Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Space using Implicit Relation Kamal Wadhwa1 , Rashmi Tiwari2 and Ved Prakash Bhardwaj3 1, 2, 3 Govt. Narmada Mahavidyalaya Hoshangabad (M.P.) Abstract The present paper deals with proving some common fixed point results in a fuzzy metric space using Implicit Relation. Index Terms: Fixed point, fuzzy metric space, occasionally weakly compatible mappings, t-norm, Implicit Relation. I. Introduction It proved a turning point in the development of fuzzy mathematics when the notion of fuzzy set was introduced by Zadeh [12] in 1965. Following the concept of fuzzy sets, fuzzy metric spaces have been introduced by Kramosil and Michalek [15] and George and Veeramani [2] modified the notion of fuzzy metric spaces with the help of continuous t-norm, which shows a new way for further development of analysis in such spaces. Consequently in due course of time some metric fixed points results were generalized to fuzzy metric spaces by various authors. Sessa [20] improved commutativity condition in fixed point theorem by introducing the notion of weakly commuting maps in metric space. Vasuki [20] proved fixed point theorems for R-weakly commuting mapping. Pant [18, 19] introduced the new concept of reciprocally continuous mappings and established some common fixed point theorems. The concept of compatible maps by [15] and weakly compatible maps by [9] in fuzzy metric space is generalized by A.Al Thagafi and Naseer Shahzad [1] by introducing the concept of occasionally weakly compatible mappings. In this paper we give a fixed point theorem on fuzzy metric space with an implicit relation defined in [14]. Our results extend and generalize the result of Wadhwa and Dubey [11] using Chouhan, Khanduja and Singh [14]. We start with some preliminaries: II. Preliminaries Definition 2.1 [4]: A binary operation *: [0, 1] × [0, 1]→[0, 1] is continuous t-norm if satisfies the following conditions: (1) * is commutative and associative, (2) * is continuous, (3) a*1 = a for all a є [0, 1], (4) a*b ≤ c*d whenever a ≤ c and b ≤ d for all a, b, c, d є [0, 1]. Examples of t- norm are a*b = min {a, b} and a*b = ab. Definition 2.2 [2]: A 3-tuple (X, M, *) is said to be a fuzzy metric space if X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous t-norm and M is a fuzzy set on X2 × [0, ∞) satisfying the following conditions: (The functions M(x, y, t) denote the degree of nearness between x and y with respect to t, respectively.) 1) M(x, y, 0) = 0 for all x, y ∈ X 2) M(x, y, t) = 1 for all x, y ∈ X and t>0 if and only if x = y 3) M(x, y, t) = M(y, x, t) for all x, y ∈ X and t>0 4) M(x, y, t)*M(y, z, s) ≤ M(x, z, t+s) for all x, y, z ∈ X and t, s > 0 5) For all x, y ∈ X, M(x, y, .) : [0, ∞) → [0, 1] is left continuous. Remark 2.1: In a FM M(X, M, *), M(x, y, .) is non- decreasing for all x. Example 2.3 (Induced fuzzy metric [2]): – Let (X, d) be a metric space. Denote a*b =ab for all a, b∈[0, 1] and let Md be fuzzy sets on X2 × [0, ∞) defined as follows: Md (x, y, t) = ( , ) Then (X, Md,*) is a fuzzy metric space. We call this fuzzy metric induced by a metric d as the standard intuitionistic fuzzy metric. Definition 2.4: Let M(X, M, *) be a FM - space. Then (i) A sequence{xn} in X is said to be Cauchy Sequence if for all t>0 and p>0 lim →∞ ( xn+p, xn, t) = 1 (ii) A sequence {xn} in X is said to be convergent to a point x ∈ X if for all t>0, lim →∞ ( xn, x, t) = 1
  • 2. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 360 Since * is continuous, the limit is uniquely determined from (5) and (11) respectively. Definition 2.5: A FM-Space M(X, M, *) is said to be complete if and only if every Cauchy sequence in X is convergent. Definition 2.6: Let A and S be maps from a fuzzy metric M(X, M, *) into itself. The maps A and S are said to be weakly commuting if M( ASz, SAz, t) ≥ M( Az, Sz, t) for all z ∈ X and t>0 Definition 2.7 [10]: Let f and g be maps from an FM-space M(X, M, *) into itself .The maps f and g are said to be compatible if for all t>0, lim →∞ ( fgxn, gfxn, t) = 1 whenever {xn} is a sequence in X such that lim →∞ fxn = lim →∞ gxn = z for some z ∈ X. Definition 2.8: Two mappings A and S of a fuzzy metric space M(X, M, *) will be called reciprocally continuous if ASun→Az and SAun→Sz, whenever {un} is a sequence such that for some Aun, Sun→z for some z ∈ X. Definition 2.9: Let M(X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. f and g be self maps on X. A point x in X is called a coincidence point of f and g iff fx =gx. In this case w = fx =g x is called a point of coincidence of f and g. Definition 2.10[8]: A pair of maps S and T is called weakly compatible pair if they commute at the coincident points i.e., if Su = Tu for some u in X then STu = TSu. Definition 2.11[1]: Two self maps f and g of a set X are called occasionally weakly compatible (owc) iff there is a point x in X which is coincidence point of f and g at which f and g commute. Example 2.11.1[1]: Let R be the usual metric space. Define S, T: R→R by Sx=2x and Tx=x2 for all x∈R. Then Sx=Tx for x=0, 2, but ST0=TS0, and ST2≠TS2. S and T are occasionally weakly compatible self maps but not weakly compatible. Definition 2.12 (Implicit Relation)[14]: Let φ5 be the set of all real and continuous function φ : (R+ )5 →R and such that 2.12 (i) φ non increasing in 2nd and 4th argument and 2.12 (ii) for u, v ≥0, φ(u,v,v,v,v)≥0 ⇒ u ≥ v Example: φ(t1, t2, t3, t4, t5) = t1 – max {t1, t2, t3, t4}. Lemma 2.1: Let {un} be a sequence in a fuzzy metric space M(X, M, *). If there exist a constant k ∈ (0, 1) such that M( un, un+1, kt) ≥ M(un-1, un, t) for all t>0 and n = 1 , 2 , 3….. Then {un} is a Cauchy sequence in X. Lemma 2.2: Let M(X, M, *) be a FM space and for all x, y ∈ X, t>0 and if for a number q ∈ (0, 1), M( x, y, qt) ≥ M(x, y, t) then x = y. Lemma 2.3[9]: Let X be a set, f and g be owc self maps of X. If f and g have a unique point of coincidence, w = fx = gx, then w is the unique common fixed point of f and g. 3. Main Result Theorem 3.1: Let M(X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let A, B, S and T be self mappings of X. Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc. If for φ∈φ5 there exist q ∈ (0, 1) such that φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t), , !,") # ($!,% ,")& # , ' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")& ' ( , ) * ( ,% ,") * ($!, !,") + . ) ( , !,") ($!,% ,") - + . ≥ 0 ……………….. (1) for all x, y ∈ X and t>0, and a,b,c,d≥0 with a&b and c&d cannot be simultaneously 0 , there exist a unique point w ∈ X such that Aw = Sw = w and a unique point z ∈ X such that Bz = Tz = z. Morever z = w, so that there is a unique common fixed point of A, B, S and T. Proof: Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc, so there are points x, y ∈ X such that Ax = Sx and By = Ty. We claim that Ax = By. If not by inequality (1) φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t), , !,") # ($!,% ,")& # , ' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")& ' ( , ) * ( ,% ,") * ($!, !,") + . ) ( , !,") ($!,% ,") - + . ≥ 0 φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, Ax, t), ,$!,") # ($!, ,")& # , ' , ,") ( ($!,$!,")& ' ( , ) * ( , ,") * ($!,$!,") + . ) ( ,$!,") ($!, ,") - + . ≥ 0 φ M(Ax, By, qt), 1, M(Ax, By, t), 1, M(Ax, By, t)& ≥ 0 φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t)& ≥ 0 Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd and 4th argument therefore by 2.12 (i) and 2.12 (ii) M(Ax, By, qt) ≥ M(Ax, By, t) Therefore Ax = By i.e. Ax = Sx = By =Ty. Suppose that there is a unique point z such that Az = Sz then by (1) we have
  • 3. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 361 φ M(Az, By, qt), M(Sz, Az, t), 2, !,") # ($!,%2,")& # , ' %2, 2,") ( ($!, !,")& ' ( , ) * ( 2,%2,") * ($!, !,") + . ) ( 2, !,") ($!,%2,") - + . ≥ 0 φ M(Az, By, qt), 1, M(Az, By, t), 1, M(Az, By, t)& ≥ 0 φ M(Az, By, qt), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t), M(Az, By, t)& ≥ 0 Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd and 4th argument therefore 2.12 (i) and 2.12 (ii) M(Az, By, qt) ≥ M(Az, By, t) Az = By = Sz =Ty, So Ax = Az and w = Ax = Sx the unique point of coincidence of A and S. By lemma (2.3) w is the only common fixed point of A and S. Similarly there is a unique point z ∈ X such that z = Bz =Tz. Assume that w ≠ z we have φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(Sw, Aw, t), 4, 2,") # ($2,%4,")& # , ' %4, 4,") ( ($2, 2,")& ' ( , ) * ( 4,%4,") * ($2, 2,") + . ) ( 4, 2,") ($2,%4,") - + . ≥ 0 φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, w, t), 4,2,") # (2,4,")& # , ' 4,4,") ( (2,2,")& ' ( , ) * (4,4,") * (2,2,") + . ) (4,2,") (2,4,") - + . ≥ 0 φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, w, t) , M(w, z, t), 1, M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0 φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), 1, M(w, z, t), 1, M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0 φ M(Aw, Bz, qt), M(w, z, t) , M(w, z, t), M(w, z, t), M(w, z, t)& ≥ 0 Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd and 4th argument M(Aw, Bz, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t) Since, w is the only common fixed point of A and we have z = Bz. M(Aw, Bz, qt) = M(w, z, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t) We have M(w, z, qt) ≥ M(w, z, t) Hence z = w by Lemma (2.2) and z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds from (1). Definition 3.11 (Implicit Relation) [14]: Let φ6 be the set of all real and continuous function φ : (R+ )6 →R and such that 3.11 (i) φ non increasing in 2nd and 4th argument and 3.11 (ii) for u, v ≥0, φ(u,v,v,v,v,v)≥0 ⇒ u ≥ v Theorem 3.2: Let M(X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let A, B, S and T be self mappings of X. Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc. If for φ∈φ6 there exist q ∈ (0, 1) such that φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Sx, Ax, t), , !,") # ($!,% ,")& # , ' % , ,") ( ($!, !,")& ' ( , ) * ( ,% ,") * ($!, !,") + . ) ( , !,") ($!,% ,") - + , M(By, Sx, t) . ≥ 0 ……………….. (2) for all x, y ∈ X and t>0, and a,b,c,d≥0 with a&b and c&d cannot be simultaneously 0 , there exist a unique point w ∈ X such that Aw = Sw = w and a unique point z ∈ X such that Bz = Tz = z. Morever z = w, so that there is a unique common fixed point of A, B, S and T. Proof: Let the pairs {A, S} and {B, T} be owc, so there are points x, y ∈ X such that Ax = Sx and By = Ty. We claim that Ax = By. If not by inequality (2) φ M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, Ax, t), ,$!,") # ($!, ,")& # , ' , ,") ( ($!,$!,")& ' ( , ) * ( , ,") * ($!,$!,") + . ) ( ,$!,") ($!, ,") - + , M(By, Ax, t) . ≥ 0 φ(M(Ax, By, qt), 1, M(Ax, By, t), 1, M(Ax, By, t), M(By, Ax, t)) ≥ 0 φ(M(Ax, By, qt), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(Ax, By, t), M(By, Ax, t)) ≥ 0 Since, φ is non-increasing in 2nd and 4th argument therefore 3.11 (i) and 3.11 (ii) M(Ax, By, qt) ≥ M(Ax, By, t) Therefore Ax = By i.e. Ax = Sx = By = Ty. Suppose that there is another point z such that A z =S z then by (2) we have A z = S z = Ty, So Ax = A z and w =Ax = Tx is the unique point of coincidence of A and T. By lemma (2.2) w is a unique point z ∈ X such that w = Bz = Tz. Thus z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The uniqueness of fixed point holds by (2).
  • 4. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 362 References: [1]. A.Al -Thagafi and Naseer Shahzad, “Generalized I-Nonexpansive Selfmaps and Invariant Approximation”, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series May, 2008, Vol.24, No.5, pp.867876. [2]. A. George, P.Veeramani, “On some results in Fuzzy Metric Spaces”, Fuzzy Sets and System, 64 (1994), 395-399. [3]. Brog, “M.A. metric space in Fuzzy Set Theory “, J. Math. And Appl., 69, 205-230 (1979). [4]. B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, “Statistical metric spaces”, Pacific J. Math. 10(1960), 313-334 [5]. C.T. Aage, J.N.Salunke,”On fixed point theorem in Fuzzy Metric Spaces” Int. J. Open Problem Compt. Math.,Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2010 ,pp 123-131. [6]. C.T. Aage, J.N.Salunke,”On fixed point theorem in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using a Control Function”, Submitted. [7]. G. Jungck,”Compatible Mappings and Common Fixed Point”, International Journal of Math. Sci. 9 (1986), 771-779. [8]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades, ” Fixed Point for Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mappings” , Fixed Point Theory, Volume 7, No. 2 ,2006, 287-296. [9]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades, ” Fixed Point for Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mappings” , Erratum, Fixed Point Theory, Volume 9, No. 1,2008,383-384. [10]. G. Jungck and B.E. Rhoades,”Fixed Point for Set Valued functions without Continuity”, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 29(3), (1998), pp.771- 779. [11]. K. Wadhwa and H. Dubey, “On Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Spaces”. Imacst, volume 2 number 1 may 2011, 5-8. [12]. L.A. Zadeh,” Fuzzy sets”, Inform and Control 8 (1965), 338-353. [13]. M. Grabiec, “Fixed Points in Fuzzy metric Spaces”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 27 (1988), 385-389. [14]. M.S. Chauhan, M.K. Khanduja and B. Singh, “Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space by Using New Implicit Relation”. Ijes, volume-1, 2012, 192-195. [15]. O.Kramosil and J.Michalek, “Fuzzy Metric and statistical metric spaces”, Kybernetika, 11 (1975), 326-334. [16]. P.Balasubramaniam, S. muralisankar, R.P. Pant, “Common fixed points of four mappings in a fuzzy metric space”, J. Fuzzy Math. 10(2) (2002), 379-384. [17]. R. K. Mishra and S. Choudhary,”On fixed point theorems in Fuzzy metric spaces”, IMACST Vol.1, No.1, Dec 2010, 45-47. [18]. R.P. Pant, “A remark on Common fixed point of Four Mappings in a fuzzy metric space”, J. Fuzzy. Math. 12(2) (2004), 433-437. [19]. R.P. Pant, “Common fixed point Theorems for contractive Mappings”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 226 (1998), 251-258. [20]. S. Sessa,” on a weak commutative condition in fixed point consideration “’, Publ. Inst. Math (Beograd), 23(46) (1982), 146-153.
  • 5. This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage: http://www.iiste.org CALL FOR PAPERS The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar