Guillaume Rosenwald Deputy Managing Director of insurance activities Macif ( France ) Friday, 3 September 2010
MACIF GROUP
From 1960 to the present day MACIF Macif established in motor insurance Chairman : Gérard Andreck Managing Director : Roger Iseli Head Office : Niort 8,900 employees 1960 First diversification – home insurance 1970 Regionalisation : with over 2.5 million policyholders, Macif is reorganised into 11 mainly autonomous geographical areas 1987 Macif is a group with diversified activities 2010 4.7 million policyholders French leader in car and motorcycle insurance
Commitment towards solidarity MACIF Macif is a mutual insurance company with no intermediaries  Macif is committed to the principles of social economy  It has no shareholders, no need for return on investment  Its policyholders insure each other mutually and are individually insured 
Breakdown of Group Turnover (2009) DIVERSIFIED ACTIVITIES 33 % Motor Health, Disability & Life 42 % 9 % Savings 10 % Home Other 6 % 5.7 Billion €
MACIF GROUP MAIN PROJECTS Start-up of our banking offer : 2 nd  half of 2010 Strategic alliance Macif/Maif/Caisse d’Epargne Group An offer based on mutualistic principles
MACIF GROUP MAIN PROJECTS Creation of a partnership (SGAM) between Macif/Maif/Matmut :  Sferen perpetuate the mutual insurance model reinforce our position and our competitivity In order to : Signature of the SGAM’s Articles of Association and Membership Agreements December 2009 Approval by the Insurance Companies’ Committee  February 2010 Approval by the Office of Fair Trading June 2010
MACIF GROUP European partnership with mutuals
Direct settlement agreements in France Guillaume Rosenwald Deputy Managing Director of insurance activities, Macif France 12th Hydra meeting  3.9.2010
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 1/ Direct Settlement Agreement objectives. 2/ Requirements for an efficient and long-term agreement. 3/ Three examples in the French market Motor insurance material damages (IRSA) Home insurance water damages (Cidre – Cidecop) Motor insurance light bodily injuries (IRCA) 4 / Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement agreements in France  -  Index Pages 3 4 5  22
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Improve claims settlement services, time, quality and innovation. Simplify processes and saving operational costs. Control of claims costs 1/ Direct Settlement Agreement objectives
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Economy  : Approaching cost neutrality, Market statistics  Transparency /costumers. Legal  : Respect of EU and national laws, Taking account of precedents (simplicity and stability of precedents), A very low demand to sue opponents. Operational  : very good experts (assessors) in the topic, high level of trust between the actors. 2/ The requirement of an efficient and long term agreement
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald The “agreed accident statement” has been used by she insured since 1964, First agreement of direct settlement set in 1968 (under pressure of the French government) Experts’ (assessors) competence and honesty supervised by the Ministry in charge of transport Clear and precise laws and precedents 1.7 million claims / year 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages Context
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA »   Quick description Direct Settlement for all material damages Fully computerized exchanges and  fixed compensation if 2 vehicles and  damages < 6500 € Precise rules of recourse for all other situation (including pile up) 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages Exhaustive codification of the accident’s situations Extensive statistical analyses …
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA »  Benefits : Great value for the insured (quick and high level service) Simplicity of computing for all the actors, Insured self settlement by internet made possible for most of 2 vehicles accidents. (if developed by the insurer) Great freedom of organization left to the insurance companies, full benefits for repair shops agreements 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA »  Limits : Economic neutrality is imperfect, Applies correctly to cars, but trucks are over compensated and bikes are under compensated. (Some insurers specialized in bikes stay out of the agreement) Promote the settlement of micro claims 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA »  Conclusion Possible next evolution : Fixed compensation depending on the type of vehicles. 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages IRSA is considered by the French Market as a success
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Creation of “agreed accident statement” Experts (assessors) corps largely heterogeneous. Few and imprecise laws and precedents Low satisfaction from the insured 1.2 million claims / year 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages Context
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP », Quick description : Direct settlement for damages < 1600 € No compensation between insurers For other cases :  conduct of an assessment and organization of the recourse 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages No computerized exchanges, No statistics
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Benefits : Simplicity for very small damages. A sensible improvement of satisfaction from the insured. More frequent management of the repair by the insurer. 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Economic neutrality is unknown, No real benefits for medium damages because of the delay for drying off, Allows poor reparation of the causes and generates repeated claims (especially in condominium)  3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Limits :
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Probable next evolution : Better classification of the claims situations. The French Market is largely unsatisfied with Cidre and Cidecop agreements. Economically, all the actors are quite sure to loose money … 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Conclusion :
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Since 1985 the “Badinter law” forces the liability insurer to offer an “honest” compensation directly to the victims.  Insurers receive automatically the statements made by police for bodily accidents. More than 95 % of the bodily damages are compensated without trial. (about 99 % for lights injuries), The medical experts are well organized and use a very clear method of physiological evaluation. All courts use the same method of economic evaluation but level varies.  0.2 million claims / year 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages Context
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) »  Quick description : Direct settlement if partial disablement  =< 5 %  Fixed compensation if definitive disablement = 0  Recourse on real costs with a limit for other cases For other cases :  conduct of an assessment and organization of the recourse No computerized exchanges since inception, Fully computerized exchanges since 1/1/2010, statistics tool in place 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Benefits : Great value for the insured (quick and high level service). Large freedom of organization left to the insurers. Full benefits dedicated to the victim and their family’s help. Strong management simplification for fully computerized insurers 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Cost management issue : No real benefits for medium and small size companies who can’t afford to computerize bodily claims, 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Limits :
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Probable next evolution : Fixed compensations based on a table depending on the disability seriousness Big and fully computerized insurers are very happy with this agreement. Small insurers are “perplexed” 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Conclusion
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Direct settlement has a real sense if the quality of the settlement is a differentiation in the competition. 4/ Direct settlement and the insurance market  Direct settlement allows cuts of cost on the global amount (claims +management) But not always on each separate cost. Some statements …
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 4/ Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement and computerized exchanges are mainly profitable for medium and big size firms. But a dominant actor do no need such agreement … more statements …
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 4/ Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement can succeed on a market if : Most insurers manage themselves the claims (or by subsidiaries)  The market is shared between medium size companies. “ My own conclusions”
3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Thank You

More Related Content

PPT
Enrico Caruso
PDF
EU Case Alert: CJEU deals a VAT blow to FS Businesses (DNB Banka / Aviva)
PPTX
Lviv MDDay 2014. Дмитро Андреєв “знайомство з .Net micro framework”
PDF
Technical claims-brief-january-2010
DOCX
Risk allocation in oil and gas contracts
PPTX
Collective redress in the EU 19.09.2013 FERMA presentation by Julien Bedhouch...
PDF
European Motor Insurance Markets Report November 2015
PDF
Selected issues on beneficial ownership from the OECD and the EU
Enrico Caruso
EU Case Alert: CJEU deals a VAT blow to FS Businesses (DNB Banka / Aviva)
Lviv MDDay 2014. Дмитро Андреєв “знайомство з .Net micro framework”
Technical claims-brief-january-2010
Risk allocation in oil and gas contracts
Collective redress in the EU 19.09.2013 FERMA presentation by Julien Bedhouch...
European Motor Insurance Markets Report November 2015
Selected issues on beneficial ownership from the OECD and the EU

Similar to Guillaume Rosenwald (20)

PDF
FNR_UK Motor_Layout_20150703_SinglePage
PPT
Luis Charlo mapfre
PPT
EUROTUNNEL -World Bank presentation May 2009
PPT
Philippe Rambaud
PPT
Chapter 22
PDF
Content for grade 10
PDF
Road to Reform: Tackling the UK’s Compensation Culture July 2014
PPT
Politics of energy and the cost of carbon future
PPTX
MEDIATION. THE ITALIAN MODEL.
PDF
AIDA – FERMA Conference 2013 - Presentations
PDF
Main changes in incoterms 2020
PDF
Analysis of Procedures and Factors Causing Motor Vehicle Insurance Claims
PDF
FERMA's response to the Insurance Mediation Directive (IMD)
PDF
Pre-Seminar Debate - The Evolution of Natural Catastrophe Coverage in France ...
PDF
Essay National Flag Pakistan
PDF
Technical claims brief se - lord justice jackson civil litigation costs - m...
PPTX
1. lecture investment law Indonesia 7.4.2015.pptx
PDF
Capital V #1 Invest Industrial: Turning Ducati Around
PPTX
Vertragswechselservice GmbH - InsurTech Innovation Award 2022
FNR_UK Motor_Layout_20150703_SinglePage
Luis Charlo mapfre
EUROTUNNEL -World Bank presentation May 2009
Philippe Rambaud
Chapter 22
Content for grade 10
Road to Reform: Tackling the UK’s Compensation Culture July 2014
Politics of energy and the cost of carbon future
MEDIATION. THE ITALIAN MODEL.
AIDA – FERMA Conference 2013 - Presentations
Main changes in incoterms 2020
Analysis of Procedures and Factors Causing Motor Vehicle Insurance Claims
FERMA's response to the Insurance Mediation Directive (IMD)
Pre-Seminar Debate - The Evolution of Natural Catastrophe Coverage in France ...
Essay National Flag Pakistan
Technical claims brief se - lord justice jackson civil litigation costs - m...
1. lecture investment law Indonesia 7.4.2015.pptx
Capital V #1 Invest Industrial: Turning Ducati Around
Vertragswechselservice GmbH - InsurTech Innovation Award 2022
Ad

More from InsuranceWorld (20)

PPTX
16 nicholas sherry
PPT
15 johan sjostrom
PPTX
14 fernando jaime
PPTX
Nicolas jeanmart
PDF
Credit Agricole Life - March 2011
PPT
Photos AXA 26_02_2011
PDF
Parousiasi kotsalos eaee
PDF
Allianz - Ισχυρό Προφίλ
PDF
Allianz - Ισχυρό Προφίλ
PPT
Isis graham donald
PPT
Isis solders presentation
PDF
EFG Eurolife
PDF
Tom Sackville
PPT
Zakos Drossopoulos
PPT
Jeremy Nurse
PPS
Παρουσίαση κ. Ciobanu
PPT
Παρουσίαση κ. Η. Κλάππα
PPT
Παρουσίαση κ. Γ.Τζανή
PPT
Παρουσίαση του κ. Dell’Isola
PDF
Παρουσίαση - Χαρτοφυλάκιο Commercial Value
16 nicholas sherry
15 johan sjostrom
14 fernando jaime
Nicolas jeanmart
Credit Agricole Life - March 2011
Photos AXA 26_02_2011
Parousiasi kotsalos eaee
Allianz - Ισχυρό Προφίλ
Allianz - Ισχυρό Προφίλ
Isis graham donald
Isis solders presentation
EFG Eurolife
Tom Sackville
Zakos Drossopoulos
Jeremy Nurse
Παρουσίαση κ. Ciobanu
Παρουσίαση κ. Η. Κλάππα
Παρουσίαση κ. Γ.Τζανή
Παρουσίαση του κ. Dell’Isola
Παρουσίαση - Χαρτοφυλάκιο Commercial Value
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
WHAT NURSES SAY_ COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMP.pdf
PPTX
operating_systems_presentations_delhi_nc
PDF
Chevening Scholarship Application and Interview Preparation Guide
PPTX
Diploma pharmaceutics notes..helps diploma students
DOCX
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENT SEMESTER MAY 2025.docx
PPTX
Cite It Right: A Compact Illustration of APA 7th Edition.pptx
PPT
hsl powerpoint resource goyloveh feb 07.ppt
PDF
faiz-khans about Radiotherapy Physics-02.pdf
PPTX
MMW-CHAPTER-1-final.pptx major Elementary Education
PPSX
namma_kalvi_12th_botany_chapter_9_ppt.ppsx
PPTX
ENGlishGrade8_Quarter2_WEEK1_LESSON1.pptx
PDF
Physical pharmaceutics two in b pharmacy
PPTX
Power Point PR B.Inggris 12 Ed. 2019.pptx
PDF
CHALLENGES FACED BY TEACHERS WHEN TEACHING LEARNERS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABI...
PDF
BSc-Zoology-02Sem-DrVijay-Comparative anatomy of vertebrates.pdf
PPTX
Key-Features-of-the-SHS-Program-v4-Slides (3) PPT2.pptx
PDF
POM_Unit1_Notes.pdf Introduction to Management #mba #bba #bcom #bballb #class...
PPTX
Math 2 Quarter 2 Week 1 Matatag Curriculum
PPTX
Copy of ARAL Program Primer_071725(1).pptx
PDF
Review of Related Literature & Studies.pdf
WHAT NURSES SAY_ COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMP.pdf
operating_systems_presentations_delhi_nc
Chevening Scholarship Application and Interview Preparation Guide
Diploma pharmaceutics notes..helps diploma students
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENT SEMESTER MAY 2025.docx
Cite It Right: A Compact Illustration of APA 7th Edition.pptx
hsl powerpoint resource goyloveh feb 07.ppt
faiz-khans about Radiotherapy Physics-02.pdf
MMW-CHAPTER-1-final.pptx major Elementary Education
namma_kalvi_12th_botany_chapter_9_ppt.ppsx
ENGlishGrade8_Quarter2_WEEK1_LESSON1.pptx
Physical pharmaceutics two in b pharmacy
Power Point PR B.Inggris 12 Ed. 2019.pptx
CHALLENGES FACED BY TEACHERS WHEN TEACHING LEARNERS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABI...
BSc-Zoology-02Sem-DrVijay-Comparative anatomy of vertebrates.pdf
Key-Features-of-the-SHS-Program-v4-Slides (3) PPT2.pptx
POM_Unit1_Notes.pdf Introduction to Management #mba #bba #bcom #bballb #class...
Math 2 Quarter 2 Week 1 Matatag Curriculum
Copy of ARAL Program Primer_071725(1).pptx
Review of Related Literature & Studies.pdf

Guillaume Rosenwald

  • 1. Guillaume Rosenwald Deputy Managing Director of insurance activities Macif ( France ) Friday, 3 September 2010
  • 3. From 1960 to the present day MACIF Macif established in motor insurance Chairman : Gérard Andreck Managing Director : Roger Iseli Head Office : Niort 8,900 employees 1960 First diversification – home insurance 1970 Regionalisation : with over 2.5 million policyholders, Macif is reorganised into 11 mainly autonomous geographical areas 1987 Macif is a group with diversified activities 2010 4.7 million policyholders French leader in car and motorcycle insurance
  • 4. Commitment towards solidarity MACIF Macif is a mutual insurance company with no intermediaries  Macif is committed to the principles of social economy  It has no shareholders, no need for return on investment  Its policyholders insure each other mutually and are individually insured 
  • 5. Breakdown of Group Turnover (2009) DIVERSIFIED ACTIVITIES 33 % Motor Health, Disability & Life 42 % 9 % Savings 10 % Home Other 6 % 5.7 Billion €
  • 6. MACIF GROUP MAIN PROJECTS Start-up of our banking offer : 2 nd half of 2010 Strategic alliance Macif/Maif/Caisse d’Epargne Group An offer based on mutualistic principles
  • 7. MACIF GROUP MAIN PROJECTS Creation of a partnership (SGAM) between Macif/Maif/Matmut : Sferen perpetuate the mutual insurance model reinforce our position and our competitivity In order to : Signature of the SGAM’s Articles of Association and Membership Agreements December 2009 Approval by the Insurance Companies’ Committee February 2010 Approval by the Office of Fair Trading June 2010
  • 8. MACIF GROUP European partnership with mutuals
  • 9. Direct settlement agreements in France Guillaume Rosenwald Deputy Managing Director of insurance activities, Macif France 12th Hydra meeting 3.9.2010
  • 10. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 1/ Direct Settlement Agreement objectives. 2/ Requirements for an efficient and long-term agreement. 3/ Three examples in the French market Motor insurance material damages (IRSA) Home insurance water damages (Cidre – Cidecop) Motor insurance light bodily injuries (IRCA) 4 / Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement agreements in France - Index Pages 3 4 5 22
  • 11. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Improve claims settlement services, time, quality and innovation. Simplify processes and saving operational costs. Control of claims costs 1/ Direct Settlement Agreement objectives
  • 12. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Economy : Approaching cost neutrality, Market statistics Transparency /costumers. Legal : Respect of EU and national laws, Taking account of precedents (simplicity and stability of precedents), A very low demand to sue opponents. Operational : very good experts (assessors) in the topic, high level of trust between the actors. 2/ The requirement of an efficient and long term agreement
  • 13. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald The “agreed accident statement” has been used by she insured since 1964, First agreement of direct settlement set in 1968 (under pressure of the French government) Experts’ (assessors) competence and honesty supervised by the Ministry in charge of transport Clear and precise laws and precedents 1.7 million claims / year 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages Context
  • 14. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA » Quick description Direct Settlement for all material damages Fully computerized exchanges and fixed compensation if 2 vehicles and damages < 6500 € Precise rules of recourse for all other situation (including pile up) 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages Exhaustive codification of the accident’s situations Extensive statistical analyses …
  • 15. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA » Benefits : Great value for the insured (quick and high level service) Simplicity of computing for all the actors, Insured self settlement by internet made possible for most of 2 vehicles accidents. (if developed by the insurer) Great freedom of organization left to the insurance companies, full benefits for repair shops agreements 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages
  • 16. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA » Limits : Economic neutrality is imperfect, Applies correctly to cars, but trucks are over compensated and bikes are under compensated. (Some insurers specialized in bikes stay out of the agreement) Promote the settlement of micro claims 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages
  • 17. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald « Indemnisation et Recours des Sinistres Automobile, IRSA » Conclusion Possible next evolution : Fixed compensation depending on the type of vehicles. 3/ Example 1 : Motor material damages IRSA is considered by the French Market as a success
  • 18. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Creation of “agreed accident statement” Experts (assessors) corps largely heterogeneous. Few and imprecise laws and precedents Low satisfaction from the insured 1.2 million claims / year 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages Context
  • 19. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP », Quick description : Direct settlement for damages < 1600 € No compensation between insurers For other cases : conduct of an assessment and organization of the recourse 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages No computerized exchanges, No statistics
  • 20. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Benefits : Simplicity for very small damages. A sensible improvement of satisfaction from the insured. More frequent management of the repair by the insurer. 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages
  • 21. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Economic neutrality is unknown, No real benefits for medium damages because of the delay for drying off, Allows poor reparation of the causes and generates repeated claims (especially in condominium) 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Limits :
  • 22. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Probable next evolution : Better classification of the claims situations. The French Market is largely unsatisfied with Cidre and Cidecop agreements. Economically, all the actors are quite sure to loose money … 3/ Example 2 : Home insurance water damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des dégâts des Eaux, CIDRE and CIDECOP» Conclusion :
  • 23. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Since 1985 the “Badinter law” forces the liability insurer to offer an “honest” compensation directly to the victims. Insurers receive automatically the statements made by police for bodily accidents. More than 95 % of the bodily damages are compensated without trial. (about 99 % for lights injuries), The medical experts are well organized and use a very clear method of physiological evaluation. All courts use the same method of economic evaluation but level varies. 0.2 million claims / year 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages Context
  • 24. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Quick description : Direct settlement if partial disablement =< 5 % Fixed compensation if definitive disablement = 0 Recourse on real costs with a limit for other cases For other cases : conduct of an assessment and organization of the recourse No computerized exchanges since inception, Fully computerized exchanges since 1/1/2010, statistics tool in place 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages
  • 25. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Benefits : Great value for the insured (quick and high level service). Large freedom of organization left to the insurers. Full benefits dedicated to the victim and their family’s help. Strong management simplification for fully computerized insurers 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages
  • 26. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Cost management issue : No real benefits for medium and small size companies who can’t afford to computerize bodily claims, 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Limits :
  • 27. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Probable next evolution : Fixed compensations based on a table depending on the disability seriousness Big and fully computerized insurers are very happy with this agreement. Small insurers are “perplexed” 3/ Example 3 : Motor insurance bodily damages «Convention d’Indemnisation et De Recours des Corporels IRCA (2003) » Conclusion
  • 28. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Direct settlement has a real sense if the quality of the settlement is a differentiation in the competition. 4/ Direct settlement and the insurance market Direct settlement allows cuts of cost on the global amount (claims +management) But not always on each separate cost. Some statements …
  • 29. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 4/ Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement and computerized exchanges are mainly profitable for medium and big size firms. But a dominant actor do no need such agreement … more statements …
  • 30. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald 4/ Direct settlement and market of insurance Direct settlement can succeed on a market if : Most insurers manage themselves the claims (or by subsidiaries) The market is shared between medium size companies. “ My own conclusions”
  • 31. 3.9.2010 12th Hydra meeting – G. Rosenwald Thank You

Editor's Notes

  • #4:  MACIF = a French mutual insurance company created initially for managers and employees working in trade and industry.  MACIF was founded by a group of industrialists and tradesmen from Niort. Jacques Vandier (the first Managing Director and today Honorary Chairman) very quickly amended the company’s statutes to cover employees from these sectors.  Regionalisation : as a result of its success and of the growing number of members, MACIF regionalised its structures in order to guarantee both a sense of proximity with its policyholders and strong representation of these policyholders within the company. The Head Office is situated in Niort quite simply because the first major French mutual insurance companies were based in the town. MACIF’s founders were inspired by such models; moreover, two of these mutual companies helped MACIF to set up in Niort.  At the time, mutual companies shared the insurance market according to socio-professional categories. There was therefore little competition between them.
  • #5: MACIF is proud to be an actor in the social economy sector.  As you may know, this sector comprises cooperatives, mutual companies and associations.  The main principles of social economy are : democratic power-sharing : “one person, one vote” solidarity within the group absence of individual profit MACIF is a company based on people and not on capital Its policyholders share common interests based on a project to which solidarity is the key. They have access to products and services which give them the best value for their money The company’s permanent funds belong to all its members and are indivisible Schematically, any surplus may be divided into three parts  First beneficiaries : the policyholders, through the quality of products and services offered, the competitiveness of prices and the innovative measures undertaken - Secondly, the company employees who are important contributors to MACIF’s success, Thirdly, the surplus is added to the company’s permanent funds
  • #6: (Figures on 31/12/2009) Car insurance made up 80% of turnover a few years ago, and today represents 33%, despite the fact that MACIF has not lost any of its market share. This is a result of our deliberate decision to diversify our activities. This policy was adopted to answer our policyholders’ growing needs.
  • #7:  The fact that we are able to offer banking services will encourage our customers to stay with our company (they have indicated that they would prefer to have one single point of contact for insurance as well as other services).  The banking profession is a complex one ; we felt it important to form a strategic alliance with MAIF and the Caisse d’Epargne Group.  MACIF and MAIF are making their own offer.  The Caisse d’Epargne Group contributes to the alliance through its banking expertise and specific services.  SOCRAM BANQUE covers the risk.  It is a major project. We are proceeding with caution so that we may offer the best possible quality of service.  55 MACIF branches, throughout France, were involved in the test period. By the end of 2010 or beginning of 2011, the whole commercial MACIF network will be involved. Our offer to our policyholders : is based on our mutualist principles (transparency, simplicity, fairness, safety, guidance) ; is far removed from the profitability models adopted by traditional banks (we seek to minimise costs for our policyholders, and part of the revenue generated by our banking activity will be paid back to them through their current account).
  • #8:  For some of our major projects, we will be looking to join forces with companies close to ours, in order to share our strengths (as we have done in the past with Inter-Mutuelles Assistance and Socram for our assistance and credit activities, for example).  The most recent example of this is the reinforcement of our ties with MAIF and MATMUT. This mutualist partnership will allow us to increase our capacity for innovation and development. We would not be able to undertake certain initiatives on our own (such as helping those subject to dependency, for example).  This reinforcement of ties will also be of benefit to the mutualist model (as in a partnership of three we will have more influence on the insurance sector).  It should also further awareness of the social economy’s needs and specificities both at State level and within European institutions.  The initial areas of cooperation include purchases related or not to insurance, reinsurance, asset management, services to customers…
  • #9:  For some of our major projects, we will be looking to join forces with companies close to ours, in order to share our strengths (as we have done in the past with Inter-Mutuelles Assistance and Socram for our assistance and credit activities, for example).  The most recent example of this is the reinforcement of our ties with MAIF and MATMUT. This mutualist partnership will allow us to increase our capacity for innovation and development. We would not be able to undertake certain initiatives on our own (such as helping those subject to dependency, for example).  This reinforcement of ties will also be of benefit to the mutualist model (as in a partnership of three we will have more influence on the insurance sector).  It should also further awareness of the social economy’s needs and specificities both at State level and within European institutions.  The initial areas of cooperation include purchases related or not to insurance, reinsurance, asset management, services to customers…