Individual’s Leadership Style Changes Due to Different Culture in the UK

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 5 Issue 3, March-April 2021 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD41114 | Volume – 5 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2021 Page 1136
Individual’s Leadership Style Changes
Due to Different Culture in the UK
Dr. Mohammad RashedKhan
Institute of Management, University of Bolton, Bolton, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates the effects of cultural dimensions on individuals’
leadership styles. The study focused on two main themes: Culture and
Leadership. Two main dimensions considered: Power Distance and
Individualism to show their effects on individuals’ two main leadership
behaviour: Democratic and Autocratic leadership styles. Considering a
phenomenological approach, the responses of participants were obtained
from their replies to an open-ended questionnaire. Data were analysed with
Hofstede’s 6D Model. Individuals are from America, Lithuania,India,Italy,and
Sri Lanka. They are currently working in the UK, performing as managerial
roles, shared their cultural experiencesandleadershipstyles.Thestudyshows
individuals from India andSriLanka havecompletelychangedtheirleadership
styles due to the surveillance of different culture in the UK. The individual
from Italy slightly modified her leadership style while the other two
participants from America and Lithuania remain unchanged as they have
similar cultural dimensions.
KEYWORDS: Culture, National culture, Leadership, Leadership styles, Hofstede’s
Cultural Dimensions
How to cite this paper: Dr. Mohammad
RashedKhan "Individual’s Leadership
Style Changes Due to Different Culture in
the UK" Published in
International Journal
of Trend in Scientific
Research and
Development(ijtsrd),
ISSN: 2456-6470,
Volume-5 | Issue-3,
April 2021, pp.1136-
1143, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd41114.pdf
Copyright © 2021 by author (s) and
International Journal ofTrendinScientific
Research and Development Journal. This
is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of
the Creative
CommonsAttribution
License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
1. INTRODUCTION
Because of rapid globalisation, open market economies, and
continuous migration process, workplaces in the UKare
becoming culturally diverse more and more (Hussain et al,
2020).Particularly, in theUK retail industry, there are many
general employees as well as managers who are from
different cultural backgrounds (Szajna-Hopgood, 2020).
Sometimes these employees can experience entirely two
different cultures which may affect their leadership
behaviour. For example, in some societies or countries,
people accept unequal distribution of power and they
believe that it is the natural order. So naturally, theybecome
followers of dictatorial leaders (Sweetman, 2012).If these
individuals move to other countries where it is completely
opposite there is a possibility that they will change their
perceptions and own leadership styles.
This article will facilitate those individuals who are not
aware of the effect of their own culture on their leadership
styles to evaluate their leadership traits. Furthermore,it will
analyse how these styles can be changed when they move
from their country of origin to the UK.
2. Literature Review
As the main focus of the study is on culture and leadership,it
is important to discuss culture anditsdifferentelementsand
dimensions. Then to find out the effect of culture on
leadership styles it is also important to take into accountthe
leadership styles, their types, and aspects. Therefore, the
literature review broadly discusses culture and leadership
behaviour below.
2.1. Culture
Culture is an abstract theme. Although it is hard to define,
anthropologists, sociologists, and many others have defined
and developed the concept of culture in different ways over
time. Anthropologists Kluckhohn and Kelly (1945: 97) have
identified culture as “all the historically created designs for
living, explicit and implicit, rational, irrational, and non
rational, which exist at any given time as potential guidesfor
the behaviour of men”. This impliescultureisa guidelineand
it is constructed by human beings to lead them. This has
been agreed by another anthropologist Herskovits (1955:
305) and he stated Culture is “the man-made part of the
environment”. Keesing (1974: 89)is also an anthropologist,
claimed that culture is “an individual’s theory of what his
fellows know, believe, and mean, histheoryofthecode being
followed, the game being played, in the society into whichhe
was born”. Culture is defined in a slightly different way in a
book of anthropology where three fundamental aspects of
every culture are explained, they are: the technological, the
sociological, and the ideological (Lewis, 1969). The
technological is related to tools, materials, techniques, and
machines. The sociological characteristic entails the men’s
relationships into which they enter. The ideological aspect
contains beliefs, rituals, art, ethics, religious practices, and
myths.
So, in general, anthropologists have given a very wide
definition to culture, covering all sorts of values, acts, and
artefacts that a particular society has developed to manage
life. While Dutch writer Hofstede (2005) posits culture
consists of some set of laws of the social game which are
unwritten. He defined culture as “collective programming of
IJTSRD41114

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or
category of people from others” (Hofstede, 2005:4).Culture
refers to those learned behaviours exemplifying the total
way of life of members inside any particular society
(Hugheset al, 1999). From House et al. (1999), the GLOBE
research program gives a complete explanation ofcultureas
“shared motives, values, beliefs, identities, and
interpretations or meanings of significant events that result
from common experiences of membersofcollectivesandare
transmitted across age generations” (Zagorsek et al, 2004:
19).Thus, culture includes every single thing of a social
human being’s lifestyle such as how they speak, which
languages they use, what are their social traditions, their
living styles and religious view, law, and justice of the
society.
From the definitions above, it is clear that elements of
culture, for example, norms, values, behaviour, etc are
shared by a large portion of the group members of society.
Communities are differentiated by all these cultural
behaviours and make the shared basis of social action.
2.2. National Culture
Culture differs from country to country since all different
countries have their own government, rulesandregulations,
traditions, rituals, activities, education systems, and family
structures. National culture is visible in a specific society’s
complete prototype of daily life. According to Oberg (1963),
cultural differences among all countries are more important
than many writers now show to recognise. Greet Hofstede
has identified six core national culture dimensions (Huang
&Crotts, 2019). These dimensions are briefly discussed
below.
Power Distance Index (PDI) is used to classify levels of
inequality in organisations and institutions (like thefamily).
Hofstede claims this represents inequality (more against
less), but is defined in a downward direction, not from the
top (Andrijauskienė&Dumčiuvienė, 2017). He also added
that power distance suggests that the inequity level of a
society is allowed by the followers as muchasbytheleaders.
Obviously, power and inequality are extremelyfundamental
facts of any society. France, Spain, Hong Kong, and Iran
showed high power distance in Hofstede’s work. Countries
which have less power distance level are the USA, Italy, and
Australia. AccordingtoHofstede’swork,UKalsoshowedthat
power distance is low in its society (Hofstede Insights,
2021).
Individualism (IDV) vs. collectivism, this dimension depicts
that an organisation or society supports or opposes any
combined activities. In the individualist society, there are
loose bonds between people: everyone thinks about
him/herself and his/her immediate family. On the other
hand, people in a collectivist society find there is strong
integration, preferring to live in a group from birth (Rojoet
al, 2020). Extended families (with uncles, aunts, and
grandparents) are the best example of this sort of society.
From Hofstede’s work, the USA, France,andSpainshowhigh
individualism. And Portugal, Hong Kong, India, and Greece
have a collectivist society. Here the society of the UKis
represented as high individualism(HofstedeInsights,2021).
Masculinity (MAS) vs. its opposite femininity, refers to a
range between masculine and feminine characteristics.
Masculine characteristics include assertiveness and
competitiveness alternatively feminine features contain
modesty and caring (Andrijauskienė&Dumčiuvienė, 2017).
USA, Italy, Germany, and Japan have high masculine
societies. On the other hand, the Netherlands and the
Scandinavian countries have more feminine societies. In
addition, UK has a high masculine society(HofstedeInsights,
2021).
Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI) deals withthefeelings of
the members of the societies that how they accept if any
uncertain or unexpected situation comes. Unstructured
situations are not usual and completely unpredictable
(Rojoet al, 2020). The societies with uncertainty avoiding
cultures “try to minimize the possibilityofsuchsituations by
strict laws and rules, safety and security measures, and on
the philosophical and religious level by a belief in absolute
Truth; 'there can only be one Truth and we have it'”
(Moonen, 2017: 6). France, Germany, Spain, and many ofthe
Latin American countries have high uncertainty avoidance
cultures. In the Netherlands, the Scandinavian countries,
Ireland, and the USA, there are low to medium uncertainty
avoidance dimension is being present. The UK hasalsoa low
to medium uncertainty avoidancesociety(HofstedeInsights,
2021).
Hofstede (2009) later added a fifth dimension Long-Term
Orientation (LTO) against short-term orientation: this fifth
dimension can be said to deal with virtue regardless of the
truth. This dimension of culture was regarded as Confucian
work dynamism. Although Confucius was a Chinese
philosopher, the dimension is valid to countries without a
Confucian tradition. Countries with LTO showed a strong
connection with time the length of a variety as well as past
and future-oriented. The societies with LTO are also
concerned with the futureplansandresultsofperformances.
Societies with Short Term Orientation show respect for
tradition, satisfying social obligations, and protecting one's
'face'. Predictably highest scores on the long-term
orientation are obtained by China and next is Japan. The UK
has a short-term orientation culture with a significantly
lower score of 25 (Hofstede Insights, 2021).
Indulgence vs. Restraint (IVR). Minkov (2010) defined this
dimension as “the extent to which people try to control their
desires and impulses, based on the way they were raised”
(Nestorović, 2016: 110).A nation with a high score in this
dimension means that the culture of that nation is Indulgent
which implies people in general show an eagerness to
become conscious of their desires and urges with regard to
getting pleasure from life and having enjoyment. They are
quite an optimist and possess a positive approach in their
mind. Moreover, leisure time is very important to them and
they are happy to spend money as they wish
(Gunarsih&Wibisana, 2019).With a very high score of 97,
Mexican culture has a definite tendency toward Indulgence
(Hofstede Insights, 2021).
2.3. Cross-Cultural Studies
Leaders from different cultures want to adjust their strong
sense of national cultural norms with the new organisation
in a multinational situation by espousing a multicultural
attitude, as provided by Fernandez and Underwood (2006:
10) which must have “a willingness to recognise the
limitations of one’s own cultural norms and to accept and
adapt to the culture of the host country”. Brewster and
Hegewisch (1993) also added that the differences between
two cultures can become very apparent when individuals
from one culture are employed in another country thathasa
different culture from the previous one. According to Tsai

(2011), culture can guide individuals in knowing what to do
and what not to do. Therefore, in a cross-cultural situation,
most of the time people adjust their behaviour because of
different cultures’ practices, values, and assumptions. Other
researchers also posit that there are connections between
culture and all kinds of individuals within an organisation in
any given country (Wadeet al, 2008).
2.4. Leadership
Useem (2001) states leadership is a method of making a
variation. He continues “it entails changing an organisation
and making active choices among plausible alternatives and
depends on the development of others and mobilising them
to get the job done” (Mullins, 2020: 363). However, Useem
(2001) advocates two latest important capabilities
connecting vision and strategy, they are, leading out and
leading up. Leaders need the skill to lead out with more use
of outsourcing. For example, if a leader thinks his job is only
to send work downwards to subordinatesorcolleaguesthen
this will not be called a leading out capability, but it will be
when he will also use his talent and creativity in delegating
work to co-workers. On the other hand, leading up aptitude
is to guide superiors, as leaders are the decentralised
authority of organisations and they also should have the
capacity to collect support from top to bottom.
Leadership has many magnitudes and leadershipstylecould
be explained in many plausible ways, such as unitary,
dictatorial, benevolent, consultative, bureaucratic,
charismatic, abdicatorial, participative, etc. (Silva Guerra,
2009). The style of managerial leadership towards
subordinate staff and the focus of power can, conversely, be
classified, broadly, within a simplified three-fold heading as
follows (Mullins, 2020).
The authoritarian style is where the manager is the only
person who makes the decision and has authority for
determining policy, procedures for achieving goals, work
tasks and relationships, control of rewards or punishments
(Bass, 1990).
The democratic style is where the manager shares the
leadership functions with co-workers.Membersofthegroup
have an important role in any vital decision. Democratic
managers give the full right to agree or disagree with any
judgment (Marques, 2006).
A manager who follows a laissez-faire leadership style
observers his/her subordinates or the fellow workers are
doing well on their own or not and s/he does not interrupt
members freedom (Mullins, 2020).
This study considers authoritarian or autocratic and
democratic leadershipstylestoexplainhowindividualsfrom
other countries interchange these styles because of a
different culture in the UK.
2.5. How Leadership Styles Are Influenced by Culture
Hypothetically culture has an important impact on the
leaderships’ formation (Huntet al, 1990). Hofstede’s
theoretical dimensions of cultures developed cultural
profiles therefore, as said by Koopman et al. (1999), cross-
cultural diversities desire some assumptions. Many cross-
cultural studies assist that culture affects leadership
perceptions, approaches, and views (Gerstner & Day, 1994;
House & Aditya, 1997; Hofstede, 2001). As House et al.
(1999) from Zagorseket al. (2004: 20) suggest, “what is
expected of leadership, what leaders may or notmaydo,and
the status and influence bestowed upon them vary
considerably as a result of the cultural forcesinthecountries
or regions in which the leaders function”.
As each country has a unique culture, so, in oneculturesome
activities are good which are at the same time inappropriate
in another culture. Within several cultures, a leader may
require taking strong important action with the intention of
being an effective leader, but in another culture, a leader
may need discussion and a democratic technique. Thus, a
leadership approach is suitable for a certain cultural
dimension which is incompatible in a different cultural
dimension. According to Janićijević (2019),inindividualistic
cultures, everyone is responsible for one’s own destiny, and
autonomy and independence arevery muchappreciated. For
that reason, the leader in this culture will have difficulties in
trying to embrace an authoritarian leadership style as the
people expect to be included in the decision-makingprocess.
On the contrary, people in collectivistic cultures expect the
leader to take care of them and protect them from
uncertainty, so they offer their complete obedience and
loyalty in return. Consequently, the authoritarianleadership
style isfavoured more than the democratic leadership style
in collectivist culture(Aycan, 2001;Northouse,2013).Thisis
also evident from Den Hartog et al. (1999) where they
suggest that there should not exist as much of a negative
attitude about dictatorial leadership in societies with high
power distance. Thus, high power distancesocietiesarevery
suitable for leaders to show their authority and they have a
high tendency to showtheir power which leads them to be
autocratic leaders (Yukl, 2013). Additionally, Smithet al.
(1994) in their work showed that within the countries with
less power distance culture, managersusea lessernumberof
regulations and processes, than do managers from more
power distance cultures. According to Likert (1961), in
cultures with high power distance, the followers naturally
expect authoritarian behaviour of the leader. As they accept
the power inequality, they do not expect to be included in
the decision-making process.Therefore,theyconsiderall the
decisions to be made by their leader and completelytakethe
responsibility and the risks on themselves. In addition,
concentrating the power the leaders often observe
paternalistic behaviour in which they pay attention to the
interests of their followers, colleagues, and subordinates, so
their leadership styles take the form of benevolent
authoritarianism (Janićijević, 2019).
It is also evident but not strongly that other cultural
dimensions such as uncertainty avoidance, masculinity vs
femininity have some impacts on individuals’ leadership
styles depending on other circumstances (Eagly& Johnson,
1990; Jung et al, 1995; Gibson, 1995; Koopman et al, 1999;
Zagorseket al, 2004). Furthermore, the latest dimension of
Hofstede’s model Indulgent vs Restraint is not available for
all the countries yet. Therefore, for this study, Power
Distance IndexandIndividualismvsCollectivismdimensions
are considered.
3. Data
This paper uses bothprimaryandsecondarydata.Secondary
data were collected from Hofstede’s study and primary data
were collected by interview. Five individuals were
interviewed with seven open-endedquestions(Appendix1).
Individuals have been selected purposively who moved in
England from other countries in the world, are working in
the retail industry, and living in England at least for ten
years. Interviews have been transcribed to case studies that
explain interviewees’ own culture, their views about the

British culture, and compare previous and current
leadership styles. All interviewees’ anonyms are used inthis
study for the data protection reason. Also, informed consent
is provided considering ethical issues. Each case study has
been descriptively andgraphicallyanalysedwiththeexisting
theories and data obtained from Hofstede’s study.
3.1. Demographic of Samples
Table 1 below represents the complete demographic of samples that have been used for this study
Name (Not real name) Country of origin Age Gender Industry How many years in the UK
Mr Kaaj Sri Lanka 47 Male Retail 15
Sarah USA 38 Female Retail 11
Jenna Lithuania 40 Female Retail 14
Laura Italy 31 Female Retail 10
Gaurav India 42 Male Retail 12
Table 1: Demographic of samples. Created by author
4. Discussion
The first interviewee is 47 years old, Mr. Kaaj. His current role is as an assistant manager of a retail store in the UK. Kaaj is
originally from Sri Lanka where he used to live in an extended family and most of the people in the Sri Lankan society do the
same. In his family, the oldest person is the most powerful. Earning family members are also powerful. They make all the
important decisions of the family. Kaaj observed, in the society, rich people,political leaders,andtheircadresarestrongerthan
other members of the society which creates high inequalities. Powerful peoplehavea tendencytounderestimateotherpeople.
Kaaj performed as a supervisor in an organisation in Sri Lanka. At his workplace, all employees like to practice their power
depending on their position. Most senior managers of the organisation hold the most superior power and it follows gradually.
Senior managers liked to misuse their power. For instance, mostofthemcomelatetotheofficeandleave early.Sometimesthey
try to exploit their subordinates by pushing them to work more and paying them less.
Seven members were working in his department. Most of the decisions were taken by Kaaj in the group, as he learned it from
his senior manager and the culture. This means he followed an autocratic leadership style. He also used to look after his
colleagues and subordinates and provide help and support as much he could which made him a very good boss.
When Kaaj moved to the UK he found a big cultural difference with Sri Lanka. After coming to this country, he joined as a sales
assistant in an organisation. He found that the organisation was very strict about the quality. Managers, as well as colleagues,
were very helpful and friendly. Rules and regulations of the organisation were equal for all employees. There was no
discrimination among men or women. After a few years, he joined his current organisation.
Factors that affected him very much of British culturearelanguage,employment rights,lessinequality,andindividualism.Back
home he followed autocratic leadership. But here the British culture influenced him to change his leadership style from
autocratic to democratic.
He shares his ideas with his colleagues and subordinates and also exchanges experiences with each other. Kaaj has observed
that in the UK it is not so easy to dismiss or transfer any individual as they are protected by law, which is not complicated for a
manager in Sri Lanka.
Kaaj thinks culture is the most important factor which affects leaders or managers to change their leadership style.
Figure 1: Scores of Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Source: Hofstede Insights (2021)
Figure 1 above shows that there is a big difference between British and Sri Lankan culture. Sri Lanka scores 80 and the UK
scores 35 in Power Distance means a very high power distance in Sri Lanka where it is very low in the UK. On the other hand,
Sri Lanka scores 35 and the UK scores 89in Individualism means Sri Lanka has a very high collectivist culture and theUKhasa
high individualist culture. Mr. Kaaj was an autocrat manager in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan culture, his family, traditions, etc.
influenced him to be an authoritarian manager. As Sri Lanka has a very high power distance and low individualistic society
(Figure 1), there exists a less negative attitude towards authoritarian leadership (Ståhl&Viklund, 2006; Janićijević, 2019).
Dominance and ostentatious displays of power might thus be appropriate for leaders in such societies. But British culture
persuaded him to become a democratic manager.
From this case study,it is clear that cultural differences affected Kaaj’s leadership style and consequently, he changed his
leadership style.

In case study 2, Sarah is from the USA. She is an independent and self-motivated person. In the USA she observed a very high
individualism and low power distance. She left her parents a long time ago. She is now working in a fashion retail shop. Sarah
performed as an assistant manager in an organisation in America. There she always tried to follow a democratic leadership
style. From American society, culture, and her family Sarah recognised democratic leadership and she always follows it in her
professional life. She thinks all are equal and they are valuable in their own right. She does not treat people based on their
social/organisational position/role. She likes to share ideas with her colleagues. When she is acknowledged then she gets
embarrassed and at the same time she feels good, and she does not like to boast about her own accomplishments.
Figure 2: Scores of the USA and the United Kingdom. Source: Hofstede Insights (2021)
Figure 2 above shows that there is not a big difference between British and American culture. America scores 40 in Power
Distance and 91 in Individualism where the UK’s scores are 35 and 89.
She moved to England in 2007. When she came here, she felt herself at home. In England,peopleareveryfriendly,alwaysgreet
each other. She experiences the spirit of Britishness. Sarah could not find a big difference between the UK and the USA.
Hofstede’s 6D model shows both UK and the USA have low power distance and high individualism (Figure 2). Therefore,there
is no effect on Sarah’s leadership style (Kececi, 2017).
In case study 3, Jenna is from Lithuania. According to Jenna, Lithuania is an individualistic country but still, individuals are
closely tied with their other family members. People in this country are very private but the power distance is very low.
However, in society, there is a hierarchy and most senior citizens of the country follow it, but young people have a different
mentality from them. She started working when she was 15 as a part-time waitress in a restaurant. After completing her
honours degree, she joined a multinational company as a management trainee. Jenna adopted the democratic leadershipstyle
from her family and society. Within the same organisation Jenna moved from Lithuania to the UK. She is still working for this
company and following the democratic leadership style. She found that people are friendlier in the UK than in Lithuania.
According to Jenna, in some cases British and Lithuanian cultures are quite similar particularly in both cultures there is less
power distance with scores of 35 and 42 respectively (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Scores of Lithuania and the United Kingdom. Source: Hofstede Insights (2021)
Figure 3 also shows Lithuania has a less individualist culture and the country scored 60 in this dimension.
From the literature, this is apparent that Jenna should be a democratic leader as both UK and Lithuania have low power
distance and individualist culture (Ståhl&Viklund, 2006; Yukl, 2013).
In casestudy 4, Laura is from Italy. She has been living in the UK for the last ten years. She is currently working as a managerof
a clothing retail store for two years. In Italy, family is the life of the society and it tries to provide stabilising influences on the
family members. For example, parents pay all theirchildren’sexpensesbeforetheybecomesolvent,andchildrenalsohelptheir
parents when they start earning. In some regions of Italy, the extended family resides together. Wealth and status are
important in Italian society. They believe they have the ability to change themselves and adapt swiftly.
Laura used to follow democratic leadership in Italy, but her colleagues’ social status was very important to her. She now feels
that it was not right, but she does not blame herself for that. Because she observed it from her culture. When she moved to the

UK, she found a lot of similarities with her own culture, but social status is not so important here. People even do not like to
bother about their position in society or family background. This influenced her a lot, and she slowly changedherperceptions.
Figure 4: Scores of Italy and the United Kingdom. Source: Hofstede Insights (2021)
Hofstede’s 6D model shows (Figure 4) that Italy scored 50 in power distance (UK 35) as in some parts of this country power
distances are often high, but Laura observed the democratic leadership stylefromthe area wheresheisfrom.Atthesametime,
the model shows that this country has a high individualistic culture (score 76) which is similar to UK (score 89).Laura
completely adjusted to the British culture over the last ten years. Because of similar culture in both Italy and UK Laura’s
leadership style are still the same which is democratic leadership (Ståhl&Viklund, 2006; Yukl, 2013; Janićijević, 2019).
However, she is still following the democratic leadership style,buthercolleagues’social statusdoesnotmattertoheranymore.
In case study 5, Gaurav’s country of origin is India. He is from a joint family, where his parents, grandparents, uncles all the
extended families were living together. Hisgrandfatherwasthemostrespectedandpowerful personinhisentirefamily.Power
distance is very high, and inequality is strongly noticeable in every part of society. He observed different types of powerful
people in society such as religious leaders, political leaders,wealthypeople,governmentofficers,andsoon.People inIndia also
inherit power from their families.
Gaurav’s first job was in a call centre in India. His manager was a complete autocratic leader which is very common in India.
From his early age, he has observed this, and people accept it normally. Therefore, employees adjust not only with their
managers’ but also any superiors’ autocratic leadership style. He was also not different from others and started to follow this
leadership behaviour. Gaurav has never been to the UK before, so, reasonably this was a big change for him.
Figure 5 shows that there is a big difference between British and Indian culture. India scores 77 and the UKscores35inPower
Distance means a very high power distance in India where it is very low in the UK. On the other hand, India scores 48 and the
UK scores 89 in Individualism means India has a very high collectivist culture and the UK has a high individualist culture.
Figure 5: Scores of India and the United Kingdom. Source: Hofstede Insights (2021)
Gaurav likes the British culture, significantly the openness and friendly behaviour. He is currently following the democratic
leadership style. According to Gaurav, individuals change their leadership styles due to the different cultures in different
countries.
His first job in the UK was in a small newsagent. The manager cum owner of that newsagent was so friendly. There were only
four employees altogether and the manager was never bossy which wascompletelyoppositetoGaurav’smanagersinIndia.He
observed how British people like to live their lives. About his current organisation, he is very positive. He is managing a large
superstore in London now. In the UK he also observed a very low power distance. All these, very specifically, low power
distance and high individualism of British culture influenced him to embrace the democratic leadership style (Yukl, 2013).
5. Conclusion, Limitations, and further
recommendations
The study has investigated how culture influencesleadersto
change their leadershipstyles.Bydeeplystudyingculture, its
dimensions, leadership approaches and the relationships
between culture and leadership, it has been identified that
high power distance andcollectivismdimensionsofa culture
strongly affect individuals to become autocratic leaders.But

same individuals when they move to the UK, slowly get
inspired by low powerdistanceandindividualistdimensions
of the British culture to follow democratic leadership styles,
and ultimately, they change their leadership styles.
Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic situation, this study
interviewed only five individuals remotely. During the
interview, it has been also identified that organisational
culture has also a big impact on leadership behaviour.
Therefore, future research can consider national and
organisational culture to analyse their effect on individuals’
leadership behaviour with a bigger sample size if possible.
References
[1] Andrijauskienė, M. andDumčiuvienė, D., (2017)
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and national
innovation level. In DIEM: Dubrovnik International
Economic Meeting, 3 (1), pp. 189-205.
[2] Aycan, Z. (2001). Human resource management in
Turkey - Current issues and future challenges.
International Journal of Manpower, 22 (3), pp. 252-
260.
[3] Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory,
research, & managerial applications, Third edition.
New York: Free Press.
[4] Brewster, C. and Hegewisch, A. (1993) European
Developments in Human Resource Management.
London: Kogan Page.
[5] DEN hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-
Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Abdalla, I. A.,
Adetoun, B. S., Aditya, R. N., Agourram, H., Akande, A.
andAkande, B. E., (1999). Culture specific and cross-
culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories:
Are attributes of charismatic/transformational
leadership universally endorsed?. The leadership
quarterly, 10 (2), pp. 219-256.
[6] Eagly, A. H. andJohnson, B. T. (1990) Gender and
Leadership Style: A Meta analysis Psychological
Bulletin, 108 (2), pp. 233-257.
[7] Fernandez, A. J. and Underwood, L. (2006). CHINA
CEO: Voices of Experience from 20 International
Business Leaders. Clementi Loop: John Wiley & sons
(Asia) Pte Ltd.
[8] Gerstner, C. R. and Day, D. V. (1994) Cross-cultural
Comparison of Leadership Prototypes, Leadership
Quarterly, 5, pp. 121-134.
[9] Gibson, C. B. (1995) an investigation of gender
differences in leadership across four countries,
Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (2), pp.
255-280.
[10] Gunarsih, T. and Wibisana, M., J. (2019) the National
Culture, Best Countries Rank Number, Corruption
Performance Index, and Governance. A Study in 8
Countries. The International Journal of Social Sciences
and Humanities Invention, 6 (7), pp. 5541–5547.
[11] Herskovits, M. J. (1955) Cultural Anthropology. New
York: Knopf.
[12] Hofstede Insights (2021) NATIONAL CULTURE,
Hofstede Insights [Online] Available from:
https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture
Accessed: 20 March 2021.
[13] Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences:
Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and
Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[14] Hofstede, G. (2009) itim International.Availablefrom:
http://www.geert-
hofstede.com/hofstede_united_kingdom.shtml,
Accessed: 2 March 2021.
[15] Hofstede, G. H. (2005) Culture and organizations:
software of the mind. 2ndedn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[16] House, R. J. andAditya, R. N. (1997) ‘The Social
Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?’, Journal of
Management, 23 (3), pp. 409-474.
[17] House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W.
and Gupta, V. (eds.) (2004) Culture, leadership, and
organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage
publications.
[18] Huang, S. S. andCrotts, J., (2019) Relationships
between Hofstede's cultural dimensions and tourist
satisfaction: A cross-country cross-sample
examination. Tourism Management, 72, pp. 232-241.
[19] Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C. andCurphy, G. J. (1999)
Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience.
3rdedn. Boston: Mass: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
[20] Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B. andSorensen, R. L. (1990) Top
management leadership: Inside the black box,
Leadership Quarterly, 1, pp. 41–65.
[21] Hussain, b., Sheikh, a., Timmons, S., stickley, T.
andRepper, J. (2020) Workforce diversity, diversity
training and ethnic minorities: The case of the UK
National Health Service. International JournalofCross
Cultural Management, 20 (2), pp. 201-221.
[22] Janićijević, N. (2019) the Impact of National Culture
on Leadership. Economic Themes, 57(2),pp.127-144.
[23] Jung, D. I., Bass, B. M. andSosik, J. J. (1995) Bridging
leadership and culture: A theoretical considerationof
transformational leadership and collectivistic
cultures, Journal of Leadership Studies, 2, pp. 3–18.
[24] Kececi, M. (2017) the Impact of Individualism and
Collectivism on the Relationship between Leadership
Styles and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour.
Research Journal of Business and Management, 4 (4),
pp. 469-484.
[25] Keesing, R. M. (1974) ‘Theories of culture’, Annual
Review of Anthropology, 3, pp. 73-97.
[26] Kluckhohn, C. and Kelly, W. H. (1945) ‘The concept of
culture’, In R. Linton (Ed. ), The Science of Man in the
World Crisis, New York: Columbia University Press.
[27] Koopman, P. L., Den Hartog, D. N., Konrad, E. and
GLOBE Research Team (1999) ‘National Culture and
Leadership Profiles in Europe: Some Resultsfromthe
GLOBE Study’, European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 8 (4), pp. 503-520.
[28] Lewis, J. (1969) Anthropology Made Simple, London:
W. H. Allen.
[29] Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New
York: McGraw-Hill.

[30] Marques, J. (2006). Issues & observations: Awakened
leadership in today's organizations. Leadership in
Action, EBSCOhost, 26 (2), pp. 23-24.
[31] Minkov, M. (2010) Cultural differencesinaglobalizing
world. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
[32] Moonen, P. (2017) the impact of culture on the
innovative strength of nations: A comprehensive
review of the theories of Hofstede, Schwartz, Boisot
and Cameron and Quinn, Journal of Organisational
Change Management, 30 (7), pp. 1149-1183.
[33] Mullins, L. J. (2020) Management and Organisational
Behaviour. 12thedn. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited.
[34] Nestorović, C. (2016) Islamic marketing:
Understanding the socio-economic, cultural and
politico-legal environment, Springer.
[35] Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and
practice, 6th ed. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA
[36] Oberg, W. (1963) ‘Cross-cultural perspective on
management principles’, Academic of Management
Journal, 6 (2), pp. 141-143.
[37] Rojo, J., Everett, B., Ramjan, L. M., Hunt, L. and
Salamonson, Y.(2020)Hofstede'scultural dimensions
as the explanatory framework forperformanceissues
during clinical placement: A mixed methods study.
Nurse Education Today, 94, pp. 104581.
[38] Silva Guerra, H. (2009) Effective organisations in the
international arena. Pensamiento&Gestión, (26), pp.
120-136.
[39] Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F. and Misumi, J. (1994)
Event management and work team effectiveness in
Japan, Britain and the USA, Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 67, pp. 33–43.
[40] Ståhl, K. andViklund, A. (2006) Working in a Different
Culture-How Does ThisAffect anIndividualsExperience
of Work. Master thesis. Lunds University, Sweden
[Online], Available from:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFi
le&recordOId=1321904&fileOId=1321905Accessed:
29 January 2021.
[41] Sweetman, K. (2012) In Asia, power gets in the way.
Harvard business review [Online] Available from:
https://hbr.org/2012/04/in-asia-power-gets-in-the-
way Accessed: 12 February 2021.
[42] Szajna-Hopgood, A. (2020) What are the UK’s top
retailers doing to improve racial & ethnic diversity in
the boardroom? Retail Gazette [Online] Available
from:
https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2020/06/what
-are-the-uks-top-retailers-doing-to-improve-racial-
ethnic-diversity-in-the-boardroom/ Accessed:
20March 2021.
[43] Tsai, Y. (2011) Relationship between organizational
culture, leadership behavior andjobsatisfaction.BMC
health services research, 11 (1), pp. 1-9.
[44] Useem, M. (2001) Leading Up. New York: Crown
Business.
[45] Wade, G. H., OSGOOD, B., AVINO, K., BUCHER, G.,
BUCHER, L., FORAKER, T., FRENCH, D. and
SIRKOWSKI, C. (2008) Influence of organizational
characteristics and caring attributes of managers on
nurses’ job enjoyment. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 64 (4), pp. 344-353.
[46] Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Harlow,
VB: Pearson.
[47] Zagorsek, H., JAKLIC, M. and STOUGH, S. J. (2004)
Comparing Leadership Practices Between the United
States, Nigeria, and Slovenia: Does Culture Matter?
Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal,
11 (2), pp. 16-34.
Appendix 1: Questionnaires
Note: This questionnaire is completely for educational reasons. Personal information will not be mentioned.
General information:
Name (optional):
Age: Sex:
Name/type of the current organisation:
Country of Origin: Moved to the UK:
1. Give a brief description of your own culture.
2. How can you differ your culture from English culture?
3. What type of leadership style did you follow in your country of origin? (Authoritarian or autocratic/ democratic/ laissez-
faire)
4. How did you feel when you came to this country?
5. What leadership style (s) you observe in your current organisation?
6. Are you facing any difficulties here with a different culture?
7. Have you changed your leadership style after moving to the UK? If yes, then explain why and what type of leadershipstyle
do you personally follow now?

Individual’s Leadership Style Changes Due to Different Culture in the UK

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Individual’s Leadership Style Changes Due to Different Culture in the UK (20)

More from YogeshIJTSRD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Individual’s Leadership Style Changes Due to Different Culture in the UK