SolrCloud uses Zookeeper to elect a leader node for each shard. The leader coordinates write requests to ensure consistency. When the leader dies, Zookeeper detects this and elects a new leader based on the nodes' sequence numbers registered with Zookeeper. The new leader syncs updates with replicas and can replay logs if any replicas are too far behind. This allows write requests to continue being served with high availability despite leader failures.
Solr Exchange: Introduction to SolrCloudthelabdude
SolrCloud is a set of features in Apache Solr that enable elastic scaling of search indexes using sharding and replication. In this presentation, Tim Potter will provide an architectural overview of SolrCloud and highlight its most important features. Specifically, Tim covers topics such as: sharding, replication, ZooKeeper fundamentals, leaders/replicas, and failure/recovery scenarios. Any discussion of a complex distributed system would not be complete without a discussion of the CAP theorem. Mr. Potter will describe why Solr is considered a CP system and how that impacts the design of a search application.
Solr Cloud allows Solr to be distributed and run across multiple servers for increased performance, scalability, availability, and elasticity. It uses Zookeeper for coordination and shares an index across multiple cores and collections. Documents are routed and replicated to shards and replicas based on a hashing function or custom routing rules to partition the data. Queries are distributed and results merged to provide scalable search across an elastic, fault-tolerant cluster.
These slides were presented at the Great Indian Developer Summit 2014 at Bangalore. See http://www.developermarch.com/developersummit/session.html?insert=ShalinMangar2
"SolrCloud" is the name given to Apache Solr's feature set for fault tolerant, highly available, and massively scalable capabilities. SolrCloud has enabled organizations to scale, impressively, into the billions of documents with sub-second search!
Deploying and managing SolrCloud in the cloud using the Solr Scale Toolkitthelabdude
SolrCloud is a set of features in Apache Solr that enable elastic scaling of search indexes using sharding and replication. In this presentation, Tim Potter will demonstrate how to provision, configure, and manage a SolrCloud cluster in Amazon EC2, using a Fabric/boto based solution for automating SolrCloud operations. Attendees will come away with a solid understanding of how to operate a large-scale Solr cluster, as well as tools to help them do it. Tim will also demonstrate these tools live during his presentation. Covered technologies, include: Apache Solr, Apache ZooKeeper, Linux, Python, Fabric, boto, Apache Kafka, Apache JMeter.
Scaling Through Partitioning and Shard Splitting in Solr 4thelabdude
Over the past several months, Solr has reached a critical milestone of being able to elastically scale-out to handle indexes reaching into the hundreds of millions of documents. At Dachis Group, we've scaled our largest Solr 4 index to nearly 900M documents and growing. As our index grows, so does our need to manage this growth.
In practice, it's common for indexes to continue to grow as organizations acquire new data. Over time, even the best designed Solr cluster will reach a point where individual shards are too large to maintain query performance. In this Webinar, you'll learn about new features in Solr to help manage large-scale clusters. Specifically, we'll cover data partitioning and shard splitting.
Partitioning helps you organize subsets of data based on data contained in your documents, such as a date or customer ID. We'll see how to use custom hashing to route documents to specific shards during indexing. Shard splitting allows you to split a large shard into 2 smaller shards to increase parallelism during query execution.
Attendees will come away from this presentation with a real-world use case that proves Solr 4 is elastically scalable, stable, and is production ready.
Solr cluster with SolrCloud at lucenerevolution (tutorial)searchbox-com
In this presentation we aim to show how to make a high availability Solr cloud with 4.1 using only Solr and a few bash scripts. The goal is to present an infrastructure which is self healing using only cheap instances based on ephemeral storage. We will start by providing a comprehensive overview of the relation between collections, Solr cores, shards and cluster nodes. We continue by an introduction to Solr 4.x clustering using zookeeper with a particular emphasis on cluster state status/monitoring and solr collection configuration. The core of our presentation will be demonstrated using a live cluster. We will show how to use cron and bash to monitor the state of the cluster and the state of its nodes. We will then show how we can extend our monitoring to auto generate new nodes, attach them to the cluster, and assign them shardes (selecting between missing shardes or replication for HA). We will show that using a high replication factor it is possible to use ephemeral storage for shards without the risk of data loss, greatly reducing the cost and management of the architecture. Future work discussions, which might be engaged using an open source effort, include monitoring activity of individual nodes as to scale the cluster according to traffic and usage.
This document discusses deploying and managing Apache Solr at scale. It introduces the Solr Scale Toolkit, an open source tool for deploying and managing SolrCloud clusters in cloud environments like AWS. The toolkit uses Python tools like Fabric to provision machines, deploy ZooKeeper ensembles, configure and start SolrCloud clusters. It also supports benchmark testing and system monitoring. The document demonstrates using the toolkit and discusses lessons learned around indexing and query performance at scale.
In the big data world, our data stores communicate over an asynchronous, unreliable network to provide a facade of consistency. However, to really understand the guarantees of these systems, we must understand the realities of networks and test our data stores against them.
Jepsen is a tool which simulates network partitions in data stores and helps us understand the guarantees of our systems and its failure modes. In this talk, I will help you understand why you should care about network partitions and how can we test datastores against partitions using Jepsen. I will explain what Jepsen is and how it works and the kind of tests it lets you create. We will try to understand the subtleties of distributed consensus, the CAP theorem and demonstrate how different data stores such as MongoDB, Cassandra, Elastic and Solr behave under network partitions. Finally, I will describe the results of the tests I wrote using Jepsen for Apache Solr and discuss the kinds of rare failures which were found by this excellent tool.
How to make a simple cheap high availability self-healing solr clusterlucenerevolution
Presented by Stephane Gamard, Chief Technology Officer, Searchbox
In this presentation we aim to show how to make a high availability Solr cloud with 4.1 using only Solr and a few bash scripts. The goal is to present an infrastructure which is self healing using only cheap instances based on ephemeral storage. We will start by providing a comprehensive overview of the relation between collections, Solr cores, shardes, and cluster nodes. We continue by an introduction to Solr 4.x clustering using zookeeper with a particular emphasis on cluster state status/monitoring and solr collection configuration. The core of our presentation will be demonstrated using a live cluster.
We will show how to use cron and bash to monitor the state of the cluster and the state of its nodes. We will then show how we can extend our monitoring to auto generate new nodes, attach them to the cluster, and assign them shardes (selecting between missing shardes or replication for HA). We will show that using a high replication factor it is possible to use ephemeral storage for shards without the risk of data loss, greatly reducing the cost and management of the architecture. Future work discussions, which might be engaged using an open source effort, include monitoring activity of individual nodes as to scale the cluster according to traffic and usage.
This document provides an overview of SolrCloud on Hadoop. It discusses how SolrCloud allows for distributed, highly scalable search capabilities on Hadoop clusters. Key components that work with SolrCloud are also summarized, including HDFS for storage, MapReduce for processing, and ZooKeeper for coordination services. The document demonstrates how SolrCloud can index and query large datasets stored in Hadoop.
This document provides information about integrating Apache Solr and Apache Spark. It discusses using Solr as a data source and sink for Spark applications, including indexing data from Spark jobs into Solr in real-time and exposing Solr query results as Spark RDDs. The document also summarizes the Spark Streaming and RDD APIs and provides code examples for indexing tweets from Spark Streaming into Solr and reading from Solr into a DataFrame.
Scaling SolrCloud to a large number of CollectionsAnshum Gupta
Anshum Gupta presented on scaling SolrCloud to support thousands of collections. Some challenges included limitations on the cluster state size, overseer performance issues under high load, and difficulties moving or exporting large amounts of data. Solutions involved splitting the cluster state, improving overseer performance through optimizations and dedicated nodes, enabling finer-grained shard splitting and data migration between collections, and implementing distributed deep paging for large result sets. Testing was performed on an AWS infrastructure to validate scaling to billions of documents and thousands of queries/updates per second. Ongoing work continues to optimize and benchmark SolrCloud performance at large scales.
Cross Datacenter Replication aka CDCR has been a long requested feature in Apache Solr. In this talk, we will discuss CDCR as released in Apache Solr 6.0 and beyond to understand its use-cases, limitations, setup and performance. We will also take a quick look at the future enhancements that can further simplify and scale this feature.
This document provides tips for tuning Solr for high performance. It discusses optimizing queries and facets for CPU usage, tuning memory usage such as using docValues, optimizing disk usage through merge policies and commit settings, reducing network overhead through batching and caching, and techniques like deep paging to improve performance for large result sets. The document emphasizes only indexing and retrieving necessary fields to reduce resource usage and tuning garbage collection to avoid pauses.
Lucene Revolution 2013 - Scaling Solr Cloud for Large-scale Social Media Anal...thelabdude
My presentation focuses on how we implemented Solr 4 to be the cornerstone of our social marketing analytics platform. Our platform analyzes relationships, behaviors, and conversations between 30,000 brands and 100M social accounts every 15 minutes. Combined with our Hadoop cluster, we have achieved throughput rates greater than 8,000 documents per second. Our index currently contains more than 620M documents and is growing by 3 to 4 million documents per day. My presentation will include details about: 1) Designing a Solr Cloud cluster for scalability and high-availability using sharding and replication with Zookeeper, 2) Operations concerns like how to handle a failed node and monitoring, 3) How we deal with indexing big data from Pig/Hadoop as an example of using the CloudSolrServer in SolrJ and managing searchers for high indexing throughput, 4) Example uses of key features like real-time gets, atomic updates, custom hashing, and distributed facets. Attendees will come away from this presentation with a real-world use case that proves Solr 4 is scalable, stable, and is production ready.
The document summarizes new features in Apache Solr 5 including improved JSON support, faceted search enhancements, scaling improvements, and stability enhancements. It also previews upcoming features like improved analytics capabilities and first class support for additional languages.
High Performance Solr and JVM Tuning Strategies used for MapQuest’s Search Ah...Lucidworks
MapQuest developed a search ahead feature for their mobile app to enable auto-complete searching across their large dataset. They used Solr and implemented various techniques to optimize performance, including custom routing, analysis during ETL, and extensive JVM tuning. Their architecture included multiple Solr clusters with different configurations. Through testing and monitoring, they were able to meet their sub-140ms response time requirement for queries.
This document provides an overview of searching in the cloud using Apache Solr. It discusses how Solr allows for full-text search across distributed servers and datasets. Key features of SolrCloud include centralized configuration in Zookeeper, automatic failover, near-real-time indexing, leader election, and optimistic locking for durable writes across shards. The document also covers Solr schemas, indexing data from various sources, caching, and using SolrJ and SolrCloud.
SFBay Area Solr Meetup - June 18th: Benchmarking Solr PerformanceLucidworks (Archived)
The document discusses benchmarking the performance of SolrCloud clusters. It describes Timothy Potter's experience operating a large SolrCloud cluster at Dachis Group. It outlines an methodology for benchmarking indexing performance by varying the number of servers, shards, and replicas. Results show near-linear scalability as nodes are added. The document also introduces the Solr Scale Toolkit for deploying and managing SolrCloud clusters using Python and AWS. It demonstrates integrating Solr with tools like Logstash and Kibana for log aggregation and dashboards.
Solr Compute Cloud - An Elastic SolrCloud Infrastructure Nitin S
Scaling search platforms for serving hundreds of millions of documents with low latency and high throughput workloads at an optimized cost is an extremely hard problem. BloomReach has implemented Sc2, which is an elastic Solr infrastructure for Big Data applications, supporting heterogeneous workloads and hosted in the cloud. It dynamically grows/shrinks search servers to provide application and pipeline level isolation, NRT search and indexing, latency guarantees, and application-specific performance tuning. In addition, it provides various high availability features such as differential real-time streaming, disaster recovery, context aware replication, and automatic shard and replica rebalancing, all with a zero downtime guarantee for all consumers. This infrastructure currently serves hundreds of millions of documents in millisecond response times with a load ranging in the order of 200-300K QPS.
This presentation will describe an innovate implementation of scaling Solr in an elastic fashion. It will review the architecture and take a deep dive into how each of these components interact to make the infrastructure truly elastic, real time, and robust while serving latency needs.
This document discusses SolrCloud failover and testing. It provides an overview of how SolrCloud uses ZooKeeper to elect an overseer node to monitor cluster state and automatically create a new replica on an available node when one goes down, allowing failover capability. It also discusses challenges with distributed testing and recommends focusing more on backfilling tests when changing code, fixing frequently failing tests, and adding more unit tests to improve Solr's testing culture.
Scaling SolrCloud to a Large Number of Collections - Fifth Elephant 2014Shalin Shekhar Mangar
This document discusses scaling SolrCloud to support large numbers of document collections. It begins by introducing SolrCloud and some of its key capabilities and terminology. It then describes four problems that can arise at large scale: high cluster state load, overseer performance issues, inflexible data management, and limitations with data export. For each problem, solutions are proposed that were implemented in Apache Solr to improve scalability, such as splitting the cluster state, optimizing the overseer, enabling more flexible data splitting and migration, and allowing distributed deep paging exports. The document concludes by describing efforts to test SolrCloud at massive scale through automated tools and cloud infrastructure.
How SolrCloud Changes the User Experience In a Sharded Environmentlucenerevolution
Presented by Erick Erickson, Lucid Imagination - See conference video - http://www.lucidimagination.com/devzone/events/conferences/lucene-revolution-2012
The next major release of Solr (4.0) will include "SolrCloud", which provides new distributed capabilities for both in-house and externally-hosted Solr installations. Among the new capabilities are: Automatic Distributed Indexing, High Availability and Failover, Near Real Time searching and Fault Tolerance. This talk will focus, at a high level, on how these new capabilities impact the design of Solr-based search applications primarily from infrastructure and operational perspectives.
Organizations continue to adopt Solr because of its ability to scale to meet even the most demanding workflows. Recently, LucidWorks has been leading the effort to identify, measure, and expand the limits of Solr. As part of this effort, we've learned a few things along the way that should prove useful for any organization wanting to scale Solr. Attendees will come away with a better understanding of how sharding and replication impact performance. Also, no benchmark is useful without being repeatable; Tim will also cover how to perform similar tests using the Solr-Scale-Toolkit in Amazon EC2.
Scaling SolrCloud to a Large Number of Collections: Presented by Shalin Shekh...Lucidworks
This document discusses scaling SolrCloud to support a large number of collections. It identifies four main problems in scaling: 1) large cluster state size, 2) overseer performance issues with thousands of collections, 3) difficulty moving data between collections, and 4) limitations in exporting full result sets. The document outlines solutions implemented to each problem, including splitting the cluster state, optimizing the overseer, improving data management between collections, and enabling distributed deep paging to export full result sets. Testing showed the ability to support 30 hosts, 120 nodes, 1000 collections, over 6 billion documents, and sustained performance targets.
Leveraging the Power of Solr with Spark: Presented by Johannes Weigend, QAwareLucidworks
Spark can be used to improve the performance of importing and searching large datasets in Solr. Data can be imported from HDFS files into Solr in parallel using Spark, speeding up the import process. Spark can also be used to stream data from Solr into RDDs for further processing, such as aggregation, filtering, and joining with other data. Techniques like column-based denormalization and compressed storage of event data in Solr documents can reduce data volume and improve import and query speeds by orders of magnitude.
This document discusses scaling Solr using SolrCloud. It provides an overview of Solr history and architectures. It then describes how SolrCloud addresses limitations of earlier architectures by utilizing Apache ZooKeeper for coordination across Solr nodes and shards. Key concepts discussed include collections, shards, replicas, and routing queries across shards. The document also covers configuration topics like caches, indexing tuning, and monitoring.
Managing a SolrCloud cluster using APIsAnshum Gupta
The document discusses managing large SolrCloud clusters through APIs. It begins with background on SolrCloud and its terminology. It then demonstrates various APIs for creating and modifying collections, adding/deleting replicas, splitting shards, and monitoring cluster status. It provides recipes for common management tasks like shard splitting, ensuring high availability, and migrating infrastructure. Finally, it mentions upcoming backup/restore capabilities and encourages connecting on social media.
In the big data world, our data stores communicate over an asynchronous, unreliable network to provide a facade of consistency. However, to really understand the guarantees of these systems, we must understand the realities of networks and test our data stores against them.
Jepsen is a tool which simulates network partitions in data stores and helps us understand the guarantees of our systems and its failure modes. In this talk, I will help you understand why you should care about network partitions and how can we test datastores against partitions using Jepsen. I will explain what Jepsen is and how it works and the kind of tests it lets you create. We will try to understand the subtleties of distributed consensus, the CAP theorem and demonstrate how different data stores such as MongoDB, Cassandra, Elastic and Solr behave under network partitions. Finally, I will describe the results of the tests I wrote using Jepsen for Apache Solr and discuss the kinds of rare failures which were found by this excellent tool.
How to make a simple cheap high availability self-healing solr clusterlucenerevolution
Presented by Stephane Gamard, Chief Technology Officer, Searchbox
In this presentation we aim to show how to make a high availability Solr cloud with 4.1 using only Solr and a few bash scripts. The goal is to present an infrastructure which is self healing using only cheap instances based on ephemeral storage. We will start by providing a comprehensive overview of the relation between collections, Solr cores, shardes, and cluster nodes. We continue by an introduction to Solr 4.x clustering using zookeeper with a particular emphasis on cluster state status/monitoring and solr collection configuration. The core of our presentation will be demonstrated using a live cluster.
We will show how to use cron and bash to monitor the state of the cluster and the state of its nodes. We will then show how we can extend our monitoring to auto generate new nodes, attach them to the cluster, and assign them shardes (selecting between missing shardes or replication for HA). We will show that using a high replication factor it is possible to use ephemeral storage for shards without the risk of data loss, greatly reducing the cost and management of the architecture. Future work discussions, which might be engaged using an open source effort, include monitoring activity of individual nodes as to scale the cluster according to traffic and usage.
This document provides an overview of SolrCloud on Hadoop. It discusses how SolrCloud allows for distributed, highly scalable search capabilities on Hadoop clusters. Key components that work with SolrCloud are also summarized, including HDFS for storage, MapReduce for processing, and ZooKeeper for coordination services. The document demonstrates how SolrCloud can index and query large datasets stored in Hadoop.
This document provides information about integrating Apache Solr and Apache Spark. It discusses using Solr as a data source and sink for Spark applications, including indexing data from Spark jobs into Solr in real-time and exposing Solr query results as Spark RDDs. The document also summarizes the Spark Streaming and RDD APIs and provides code examples for indexing tweets from Spark Streaming into Solr and reading from Solr into a DataFrame.
Scaling SolrCloud to a large number of CollectionsAnshum Gupta
Anshum Gupta presented on scaling SolrCloud to support thousands of collections. Some challenges included limitations on the cluster state size, overseer performance issues under high load, and difficulties moving or exporting large amounts of data. Solutions involved splitting the cluster state, improving overseer performance through optimizations and dedicated nodes, enabling finer-grained shard splitting and data migration between collections, and implementing distributed deep paging for large result sets. Testing was performed on an AWS infrastructure to validate scaling to billions of documents and thousands of queries/updates per second. Ongoing work continues to optimize and benchmark SolrCloud performance at large scales.
Cross Datacenter Replication aka CDCR has been a long requested feature in Apache Solr. In this talk, we will discuss CDCR as released in Apache Solr 6.0 and beyond to understand its use-cases, limitations, setup and performance. We will also take a quick look at the future enhancements that can further simplify and scale this feature.
This document provides tips for tuning Solr for high performance. It discusses optimizing queries and facets for CPU usage, tuning memory usage such as using docValues, optimizing disk usage through merge policies and commit settings, reducing network overhead through batching and caching, and techniques like deep paging to improve performance for large result sets. The document emphasizes only indexing and retrieving necessary fields to reduce resource usage and tuning garbage collection to avoid pauses.
Lucene Revolution 2013 - Scaling Solr Cloud for Large-scale Social Media Anal...thelabdude
My presentation focuses on how we implemented Solr 4 to be the cornerstone of our social marketing analytics platform. Our platform analyzes relationships, behaviors, and conversations between 30,000 brands and 100M social accounts every 15 minutes. Combined with our Hadoop cluster, we have achieved throughput rates greater than 8,000 documents per second. Our index currently contains more than 620M documents and is growing by 3 to 4 million documents per day. My presentation will include details about: 1) Designing a Solr Cloud cluster for scalability and high-availability using sharding and replication with Zookeeper, 2) Operations concerns like how to handle a failed node and monitoring, 3) How we deal with indexing big data from Pig/Hadoop as an example of using the CloudSolrServer in SolrJ and managing searchers for high indexing throughput, 4) Example uses of key features like real-time gets, atomic updates, custom hashing, and distributed facets. Attendees will come away from this presentation with a real-world use case that proves Solr 4 is scalable, stable, and is production ready.
The document summarizes new features in Apache Solr 5 including improved JSON support, faceted search enhancements, scaling improvements, and stability enhancements. It also previews upcoming features like improved analytics capabilities and first class support for additional languages.
High Performance Solr and JVM Tuning Strategies used for MapQuest’s Search Ah...Lucidworks
MapQuest developed a search ahead feature for their mobile app to enable auto-complete searching across their large dataset. They used Solr and implemented various techniques to optimize performance, including custom routing, analysis during ETL, and extensive JVM tuning. Their architecture included multiple Solr clusters with different configurations. Through testing and monitoring, they were able to meet their sub-140ms response time requirement for queries.
This document provides an overview of searching in the cloud using Apache Solr. It discusses how Solr allows for full-text search across distributed servers and datasets. Key features of SolrCloud include centralized configuration in Zookeeper, automatic failover, near-real-time indexing, leader election, and optimistic locking for durable writes across shards. The document also covers Solr schemas, indexing data from various sources, caching, and using SolrJ and SolrCloud.
SFBay Area Solr Meetup - June 18th: Benchmarking Solr PerformanceLucidworks (Archived)
The document discusses benchmarking the performance of SolrCloud clusters. It describes Timothy Potter's experience operating a large SolrCloud cluster at Dachis Group. It outlines an methodology for benchmarking indexing performance by varying the number of servers, shards, and replicas. Results show near-linear scalability as nodes are added. The document also introduces the Solr Scale Toolkit for deploying and managing SolrCloud clusters using Python and AWS. It demonstrates integrating Solr with tools like Logstash and Kibana for log aggregation and dashboards.
Solr Compute Cloud - An Elastic SolrCloud Infrastructure Nitin S
Scaling search platforms for serving hundreds of millions of documents with low latency and high throughput workloads at an optimized cost is an extremely hard problem. BloomReach has implemented Sc2, which is an elastic Solr infrastructure for Big Data applications, supporting heterogeneous workloads and hosted in the cloud. It dynamically grows/shrinks search servers to provide application and pipeline level isolation, NRT search and indexing, latency guarantees, and application-specific performance tuning. In addition, it provides various high availability features such as differential real-time streaming, disaster recovery, context aware replication, and automatic shard and replica rebalancing, all with a zero downtime guarantee for all consumers. This infrastructure currently serves hundreds of millions of documents in millisecond response times with a load ranging in the order of 200-300K QPS.
This presentation will describe an innovate implementation of scaling Solr in an elastic fashion. It will review the architecture and take a deep dive into how each of these components interact to make the infrastructure truly elastic, real time, and robust while serving latency needs.
This document discusses SolrCloud failover and testing. It provides an overview of how SolrCloud uses ZooKeeper to elect an overseer node to monitor cluster state and automatically create a new replica on an available node when one goes down, allowing failover capability. It also discusses challenges with distributed testing and recommends focusing more on backfilling tests when changing code, fixing frequently failing tests, and adding more unit tests to improve Solr's testing culture.
Scaling SolrCloud to a Large Number of Collections - Fifth Elephant 2014Shalin Shekhar Mangar
This document discusses scaling SolrCloud to support large numbers of document collections. It begins by introducing SolrCloud and some of its key capabilities and terminology. It then describes four problems that can arise at large scale: high cluster state load, overseer performance issues, inflexible data management, and limitations with data export. For each problem, solutions are proposed that were implemented in Apache Solr to improve scalability, such as splitting the cluster state, optimizing the overseer, enabling more flexible data splitting and migration, and allowing distributed deep paging exports. The document concludes by describing efforts to test SolrCloud at massive scale through automated tools and cloud infrastructure.
How SolrCloud Changes the User Experience In a Sharded Environmentlucenerevolution
Presented by Erick Erickson, Lucid Imagination - See conference video - http://www.lucidimagination.com/devzone/events/conferences/lucene-revolution-2012
The next major release of Solr (4.0) will include "SolrCloud", which provides new distributed capabilities for both in-house and externally-hosted Solr installations. Among the new capabilities are: Automatic Distributed Indexing, High Availability and Failover, Near Real Time searching and Fault Tolerance. This talk will focus, at a high level, on how these new capabilities impact the design of Solr-based search applications primarily from infrastructure and operational perspectives.
Organizations continue to adopt Solr because of its ability to scale to meet even the most demanding workflows. Recently, LucidWorks has been leading the effort to identify, measure, and expand the limits of Solr. As part of this effort, we've learned a few things along the way that should prove useful for any organization wanting to scale Solr. Attendees will come away with a better understanding of how sharding and replication impact performance. Also, no benchmark is useful without being repeatable; Tim will also cover how to perform similar tests using the Solr-Scale-Toolkit in Amazon EC2.
Scaling SolrCloud to a Large Number of Collections: Presented by Shalin Shekh...Lucidworks
This document discusses scaling SolrCloud to support a large number of collections. It identifies four main problems in scaling: 1) large cluster state size, 2) overseer performance issues with thousands of collections, 3) difficulty moving data between collections, and 4) limitations in exporting full result sets. The document outlines solutions implemented to each problem, including splitting the cluster state, optimizing the overseer, improving data management between collections, and enabling distributed deep paging to export full result sets. Testing showed the ability to support 30 hosts, 120 nodes, 1000 collections, over 6 billion documents, and sustained performance targets.
Leveraging the Power of Solr with Spark: Presented by Johannes Weigend, QAwareLucidworks
Spark can be used to improve the performance of importing and searching large datasets in Solr. Data can be imported from HDFS files into Solr in parallel using Spark, speeding up the import process. Spark can also be used to stream data from Solr into RDDs for further processing, such as aggregation, filtering, and joining with other data. Techniques like column-based denormalization and compressed storage of event data in Solr documents can reduce data volume and improve import and query speeds by orders of magnitude.
This document discusses scaling Solr using SolrCloud. It provides an overview of Solr history and architectures. It then describes how SolrCloud addresses limitations of earlier architectures by utilizing Apache ZooKeeper for coordination across Solr nodes and shards. Key concepts discussed include collections, shards, replicas, and routing queries across shards. The document also covers configuration topics like caches, indexing tuning, and monitoring.
Managing a SolrCloud cluster using APIsAnshum Gupta
The document discusses managing large SolrCloud clusters through APIs. It begins with background on SolrCloud and its terminology. It then demonstrates various APIs for creating and modifying collections, adding/deleting replicas, splitting shards, and monitoring cluster status. It provides recipes for common management tasks like shard splitting, ensuring high availability, and migrating infrastructure. Finally, it mentions upcoming backup/restore capabilities and encourages connecting on social media.
This document summarizes a presentation about SolrCloud shard splitting. It introduces the presenter and his background with Apache Lucene and Solr. The presentation covers an overview of SolrCloud, how documents are routed to shards in SolrCloud, the SolrCloud collections API, and the new functionality for splitting shards in Solr 4.3 to allow dynamic resharding of collections without downtime. It provides details on the shard splitting mechanism and tips for using the new functionality.
SolrCloud - High Availability and Fault Tolerance: Presented by Mark Miller, ...Lucidworks
This document discusses SolrCloud's approach to high availability and fault tolerance. It describes how SolrCloud handles various failure cases like a leader dying or a replica becoming partitioned. It also discusses the replica recovery process and some issues like leader election forward progress stalls. The document suggests some potential improvements like handling cluster shutdown/startup better and giving users more control over durability requirements.
This document summarizes concepts and techniques for administering and monitoring SolrCloud, including: how SolrCloud distributes data across shards and replicas; how to start a local or distributed SolrCloud cluster; how to create, split, and reload collections using the Collections API; how to modify schemas dynamically using the Schema API; directory implementations and segment merging; configuring autocommits; caching in Solr; metrics to monitor such as indexing throughput, search latency, and JVM memory usage; and tools for monitoring Solr clusters like the Solr administration panel and JMX.
The document provides an overview and agenda for an Apache Solr crash course. It discusses topics such as information retrieval, inverted indexes, metrics for evaluating IR systems, Apache Lucene, the Lucene and Solr APIs, indexing, searching, querying, filtering, faceting, highlighting, spellchecking, geospatial search, and Solr architectures including single core, multi-core, replication, and sharding. It also provides tips on performance tuning, using plugins, and developing a Solr-based search engine.
Solr and Elasticsearch, a performance studyCharlie Hull
The document summarizes a performance comparison study conducted between Elasticsearch and SolrCloud. It found that SolrCloud was slightly faster at indexing and querying large datasets, and was able to support a significantly higher queries per second. However, the document notes limitations to the study and concludes that both Elasticsearch and SolrCloud showed acceptable performance, so the best option depends on the specific search application requirements.
Anyone who has tried integrating search in their application knows how good and powerful Solr is but always wished it was simpler to get started and simpler to take it to production.
I will talk about the recent features added to Solr making it easier for users and some of the changes we plan on adding soon to make the experience even better.
This 30 minute talk will aim to cover the basics of lucene internals. This would help you make better choices of the configuration options which are exposed via the solrconfig file in Solr.
Basically everything you need to get started on your Zookeeper training, and setup apache Hadoop high availability with QJM setup with automatic failover.
This document provides an introduction to SolrCloud, which enables horizontal scaling of a Solr search index using sharding and replication. Key terminology is defined, including ZooKeeper, nodes, collections, shards, replicas, and leaders. The document outlines the high-level SolrCloud architecture and discusses features like sharding, document routing, replication, distributed indexing and querying. Challenges around consistency and availability are also covered.
Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that provides naming, configuration, synchronization, and group services. It allows distributed processes to coordinate with each other through a shared hierarchical namespace of data registers called znodes. Zookeeper follows a leader-elected consensus protocol to guarantee atomic broadcast of state updates from the leader to followers. It uses a hierarchical namespace of znodes similar to a file system to store configuration data and other application-defined metadata. Zookeeper provides services like leader election, group membership, synchronization, and configuration management that are essential for distributed systems.
Rackspace: Email's Solution for Indexing 50K Documents per Second: Presented ...Lucidworks
George Bailey and Cameron Baker of Rackspace presented their solution for indexing over 50,000 documents per second for Rackspace Email. They modernized their system using Apache Flume for event processing and aggregation and SolrCloud for real-time search. This reduced indexing time from over 20 minutes to under 5 seconds, reduced the number of physical servers needed from over 100 to 14, and increased indexing throughput from 1,000 to over 50,000 documents per second while supporting over 13 billion searchable documents.
The document provides an introduction to the ELK stack for log analysis and visualization. It discusses why large data tools are needed for network traffic and log analysis. It then describes the components of the ELK stack - Elasticsearch for storage and search, Logstash for data collection and parsing, and Kibana for visualization. Several use cases are presented, including how Cisco and Yale use the ELK stack for security monitoring and analyzing biomedical research data.
This document provides an introduction to Apache Solr, an open-source enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene. It discusses how Solr indexes content, processes search queries, and returns results with features like faceting, spellchecking, and scaling. The document also outlines how Solr works, how to configure and use it, and examples of large companies that employ Solr for search.
Azure Cosmos DB is Microsoft's globally distributed database service that is available in all Azure regions and clouds. It was designed from the ground up to be massively scalable and provide guaranteed low latency and high availability across any number of geographic locations. Cosmos DB uses a multi-model database engine and strict resource governance to securely isolate and optimize performance for different workloads across many tenants.
Automated Cluster Management and Recovery for Large Scale Multi-Tenant Sea...Lucidworks
The document describes Bloomreach's architecture for managing a large-scale SolrCloud cluster across multiple data centers. It discusses the challenges of serving real-time queries at scale, managing configurations and rankings across tenants and data centers, and providing high availability and recovery capabilities. The key components of Bloomreach's architecture include a cluster management suite, replication and ranking configuration APIs, and deployment/recovery services for adding or replacing data centers and collections.
Webinar: Faster Log Indexing with FusionLucidworks
The document discusses Lucidworks Fusion, a log analytics platform that combines Apache Solr, Logstash, and Kibana. It describes how Fusion uses a time-based partitioning scheme to index logs into daily collections with hourly shards for query performance. It also discusses using transient collections to handle high volume indexing into multiple shards to avoid bottlenecks. The document provides details on schema design considerations, moving old data to cheaper storage, and GC tuning for Solr deployments handling large-scale log analytics.
Paul Dix, CTO and co-founder of InfluxData, discussed the future of InfluxDB and the release of InfluxDB 2.0 Open Source. He explained that InfluxDB 2.0 has been rebuilt from the ground up to address limitations of the original InfluxDB like lack of distributed features and poor performance for high cardinality analytics data. The new database, called InfluxDB IOx, uses a columnar data store with parquet files and is designed to be distributed, federated, and able to run analytics at scale on high cardinality data.
Building a Large Scale SEO/SEM Application with Apache Solr: Presented by Rah...Lucidworks
The document discusses building a large scale SEO/SEM application using Apache Solr. It describes some of the key challenges faced in indexing and searching over 40 billion records in the application's database each month. It discusses techniques used to optimize the data import process, create a distributed index across multiple tables, address out of memory errors, and improve search performance through partitioning, index optimization, and external caching.
Taking Splunk to the Next Level - Architecture Breakout SessionSplunk
This document provides an overview of scaling a Splunk deployment from an initial use case to a larger enterprise deployment. It discusses growing use cases and data volume over time. The agenda covers use case mapping, simple scaling approaches, indexer and search head clustering, distributed management, and hybrid cloud deployments. Best practices are outlined for sizing storage, tuning indexers, and designing high availability into the forwarding, indexing, and search tiers. Clustering impacts on storage sizing and additional hosts are also addressed.
The document discusses Solr and its capabilities for large-scale search. It provides examples of how Solr has been used for compliance monitoring, web analytics, and search over consumer data and content. It also outlines the key features of Solr, such as indexing in HDFS, deployment options, and upcoming improvements to areas like security, performance, and integration with Apache Spark. Lucidworks provides commercial support for Solr and has experience implementing large-scale Solr deployments.
BloomReach developed an elastic Solr infrastructure called Solr Compute Cloud (SC2) to address the challenges of scaling their search platform. SC2 allows search pipelines and indexing jobs to dynamically provision isolated Solr clusters from an API to run in, improving throughput, stability and availability. It utilizes a Solr HAFT service to replicate data between clusters and provide disaster recovery by cloning clusters. This elastic approach isolates workloads, allows individual scaling and prevents performance issues caused by shared clusters.
Building a Large Scale SEO/SEM Application with Apache SolrRahul Jain
Slides from my talk on "Building a Large Scale SEO/SEM Application with Apache Solr" in Lucene/Solr Revolution 2014 where I talk how we handle Indexing/Search of 40 billion records (documents)/month in Apache Solr with 4.6 TB compressed index data.
Abstract: We are working on building a SEO/SEM application where an end user search for a "keyword" or a "domain" and gets all the insights about these including Search engine ranking, CPC/CPM, search volume, No. of Ads, competitors details etc. in a couple of seconds. To have this intelligence, we get huge web data from various sources and after intensive processing it is 40 billion records/month in MySQL database with 4.6 TB compressed index data in Apache Solr.
Due to large volume, we faced several challenges while improving indexing performance, search latency and scaling the overall system. In this session, I will talk about our several design approaches to import data faster from MySQL, tricks & techniques to improve the indexing performance, Distributed Search, DocValues(life saver), Redis and the overall system architecture.
Global introduction to elastisearch presented at BigData meetup.
Use cases, getting started, Rest CRUD API, Mapping, Search API, Query DSL with queries and filters, Analyzers, Analytics with facets and aggregations, Percolator, High Availability, Clients & Integrations, ...
The document discusses Solr Compute Cloud (SC2), an elastic Solr infrastructure developed by BloomReach to address challenges of scaling search platforms for big data applications. SC2 dynamically provisions Solr clusters in the cloud for pipelines and indexing jobs, providing isolation. It ensures latency guarantees, dynamic scaling, high availability and disaster recovery. SC2 addresses issues BloomReach faced with a shared cluster approach like throughput limitations, stability problems and indexing challenges.
Solr Recipes provides quick and easy steps for common use cases with Apache Solr. Bite-sized recipes will be presented for data ingestion, textual analysis, client integration, and each of Solr’s features including faceting, more-like-this, spell checking/suggest, and others.
This document discusses building distributed search applications using Apache Solr. It provides an overview of Solr architecture and components like schema, indexing, querying etc. It also describes hands-on activities to index sample data from disk, database using Data Import Handler and SolrJ client. Query syntax for different types of queries and configuration of search handlers is also covered.
This document provides an introduction and overview of Apache Geode, an open-source distributed data management platform. The summary includes:
- Apache Geode is a distributed, in-memory data management platform that provides high performance, scalability, resiliency and continuous availability for data-oriented applications.
- It is used by over 1000 systems in production for use cases involving fast access to critical datasets, location-aware distributed data processing, and event-driven data architectures.
- Some example Geode deployments include handling 17 billion records in memory for GE Power & Water, processing 4.6 million transactions per day for China Railways, and supporting 120,000 concurrent users for Indian Railways.
2. Apache Solr has a huge install base and tremendous momentum
Solr is both established & growing
250,000+
most widely used search
solution on the planet. 8M+ total downloads
monthly downloads
You use Solr everyday.
Solr has tens of thousands
of applications in production.
2500+ open Solr jobs.
Activity Summary
30 Day summary
Aug 18 - Sep 17 2014
• 128 Commits
• 18 Contributors
12 Month Summary
Sep 17, 2013 - Sep 17, 2014
• 1351 Commits
• 29 Contributors
via https://www.openhub.net/p/solr
3. Solr scalability is unmatched.
• 10TB+ Index Size
• 10 Billion+ Documents
• 100 Million+ Daily Requests
5. What is Solr?
• A system built to search text
• A specialized type of database management
system
• A platform to build search applications on
• Customizable, open source software
7. What is SolrCloud?
Subset of optional features in Solr to enable and
simplify horizontal scaling a search index using
sharding and replication.
Goals
scalability, performance, high-availability,
simplicity, and elasticity
8. Terminology
• ZooKeeper: Distributed coordination service that provides centralised
configuration, cluster state management, and leader election
• Node: JVM process bound to a specific port on a machine
• Collection: Search index distributed across multiple nodes with same
configuration
• Shard: Logical slice of a collection; each shard has a name, hash range, leader
and replication factor. Documents are assigned to one and only one shard
per collection using a hash-based document routing strategy
• Replica: A copy of a shard in a collection
• Overseer: A special node that executes cluster administration commands and
writes updated state to ZooKeeper. Automatic failover and leader election.
10. Collection == Distributed Index
• A collection is a distributed index defined by:
• named configuration stored in ZooKeeper
• number of shards: documents are distributed across N partitions of the index
• document routing strategy: how documents get assigned to shards
• replication factor: how many copies of each document in the collection
• Collections API:
• curl "http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?
action=CREATE&name=punemeetup&replicationFactor=2&numShards=2&coll
ection.configName=myonf
12. Document Routing
• Each shard covers a hash-range
• Default: Hash ID into 32-bit integer, map to range
• leads to balanced (roughly) shards
• Custom-hashing
• Tri-level: app!user!doc
• Implicit: no hash-range set for shards
13. Replication
• Why replicate?
• High-availability
• Load balancing
• How does it work in SolrCloud?
• Near-real-time, not master-slave
• Leader forwards to replicas in parallel, waits for response
• Error handling during indexing is tricky
14. Distributed Indexing
• Get cluster state from ZK
• Route document directly to leader (hash on doc ID)
• Persist document on durable storage (tlog)
• Forward to healthy replicas
• Acknowledge write succeed to client
15. Shard Leader
• Additional responsibilities during indexing only!
Not a master node
• Leader is a replica (handles queries)
• Accepts update requests for the shard
• Increments the _version_ on the new or updated
doc
• Sends updates (in parallel) to all replicas
16. Distributed Queries
• Query client can be ZK aware or just query via a load
balancer
• Client can send query to any node in the cluster
• Controller node distributes the query to a replica for
each shard to identify documents matching query
• Controller node sorts the results from step 3 and
issues a second query for all fields for a page of
results
17. Scalability / Stability Highlights
• All nodes in cluster perform indexing and execute
queries; no master node
• Distributed indexing: No SPoF, high throughput via
direct updates to leaders, automated failover to new
leader
• Distributed queries: Add replicas to scale-out qps;
parallelize complex query computations; fault-tolerance
• Indexing / queries continue so long as there is 1 healthy
replica per shard
18. Zookeeper
• Is a very good thing ... clusters are a zoo!
• Centralized configuration management
• Cluster state management
• Leader election (shard leader and overseer)
• Overseer distributed work queue
• Live Nodes
• Ephemeral znodes used to signal a server is gone
• Needs 3 nodes for quorum in production
19. Zookeeper: State Management
• Keep track of live nodes /live_nodes znode
• ephemeral nodes
• ZooKeeper client timeout
• Collection metadata and replica state in /clusterstate.json
• Every core has watchers for /live_nodes and /
clusterstate.json
• Leader election
• ZooKeeper sequence number on ephemeral znodes
20. Other Features/Highlights
• Near-Real-Time Search: Documents are visible within a second or so after
being indexed
• Partial Document Update: Just update the fields you need to change on
existing documents
• Optimistic Locking: Ensure updates are applied to the correct version of a
document
• Transaction log: Better recoverability; peer-sync between nodes after
hiccups
• HTTPS
• Use HDFS for storing indexes
• Use MapReduce for building index (SOLR-1301)
22. Solr on YARN
• Run the SolrClient application :
• Allocate container to run SolrMaster
• SolrMaster requests containers to run SolrCloud
nodes
• Solr containers allocated across cluster
• SolrCloud node connects to ZooKeeper
23. More Information on Solr on YARN
• https://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-yarn/
• https://github.com/LucidWorks/yarn-proto
• https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6743
24. Our users are also pushing the limits
https://twitter.com/bretthoerner/status/476830302430437376
25. Up, up and away!
https://twitter.com/bretthoerner/status/476838275106091008