SlideShare a Scribd company logo
JAYA SUPERMARKET
     COLLAPSE


Group 3
Kartini Bt Muhamad
Kartini Bt Ibrahim
Lim Teck Chee
Objectives
 To know the process and
 procedure involved in
 demolition of building.

To educate people about the
importance of adopting ethical
conducts to prevent disastrous
consequences
Introduction
 Structural demolition is defined as an
  operation to bring down or destruct the
  structure. It can be completely or partially
  dismantling of a structure by planned and
  controlled methods in order to ensure the
  safety of work.
 Buildings, like all structures, are designed
  to support certain loads without
  deforming excessively.
 The loads are the weights of people and
  objects, the weight of rain and snow and
Causes of Collapse
 The causes of building collapse can be
  classified under general headings to facilitate
  analysis.
 These headings are:
                         Bad Design
                     Faulty Construction
                     Foundation Failure
                     Extraordinary Loads
                  Unexpected Failure Modes
                    Combination of Causes
The Evaluation of Demolition
           Techniques
 Demolition techniques for structure is greatly
  affected by the structure form using
  reinforcement concrete, pre stressed
  concrete, plain concrete or masonry and the
  size of the constructed structural.
 The location of the building, range of the
  demolition either is whole or partial
  demolition, grade of safety in work and the
  time taken to demolish the structure will
  greatly affect the evaluation if demolition
  technique.
 The evaluation of demolition method is a very
Experience and knowledge play crucial
 role in demolition engineering. Those
 parameters will affect the decision of
 engineer in determine the suitable method
 of demolition
 Many demolition techniques had invented
 and applied in this world such as using
 machinery method, hand
 method, chemical agent, explosion and
 hydraulic demolition.
CASE
STUDY
Background of Case Study
 Built in 1974, it was one of the first supermarkets in
  Petaling Jaya and has survived the many facets of
  development until now.
 The shopping centre was involved in a controversy in the
  early 1990s when it built its present 10-storey car park
  extension - four storeys higher than what the building
  plans approved by the then Petaling Jaya Municipal
  Council (MPPJ).
 The building has four storeys of retail units, five storeys
  of office units and four storeys of carparks. The building
  has been earmarked for redevelopment, where it will be
  demolished and rebuilt with better-planned features like
  loading bays, access roads and security.
 One of the city’s earliest landmarks, Jaya
  Supermarket, collapsed while demolition
  work was going on.
 A 10-storey office block at the other end of
  the building was not affected.
 It was on the process of the reconstruction of
  a four-storey complex and basement parking
  along Jalan Semangat.
 People around there saw that six cranes
  falling down along with the building.
 Claimed the lives of seven Indonesian
  construction workers. Three others were
  injured.
Reasons of the Collapse
• Initial investigations showed that the
  contractor, Pembinaan C.W Yap Sdn Bhd, did not get
  the greenlight from the Department Of Safety and
  Health (DOSH) to start demolition, although it did get
  approval from the Petaling Jaya City Council to carry
  out the work.
• Investigation also state that the contractor not use the
  proper methods for demolish the building.
• Indicated overloading caused by heavy machines
  may have triggered the collapse.
• Eight heavy demolition tractors were in the building
  when the incident occurred.
• Nine mini excavators were to be hoisted on the
  building’s two roofs — three at the ninth floor and six
  at the fourth floor roofs.
Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest
Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest
Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest
Action Taken
• A month after the incident, the state government
  blacklisted the owner and firms (6) involved in the
  redevelopment of the Jaya Supermarket.

    Jaya Section Fourteen Sdn Bhd (land owner and
    developer)
    DP Architects Sdn Bhd (that submitted the
    building plan)
   Meinhardht (M) Sdn Bhd (engineering company)
   Pembinaan CW Yap Sdn Bhd (contractor)
    Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd (engineering
    contractor)
    DLS Management (project manager).
 Syarikat Pembinaan C.W Yap Sdn Bhd, the
  main contractor in charge of demolition and
  reconstruction at the site was charged at the
  Sessions Court under Section 17(1) of the
  Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994.
 Sub-contractor Lian Hup Earth Work and
  Construction Sdn Bhd was charged under
  Section 15 (1) of the same Act for failing, as
  employer, to ensure safety, health and welfare
  of all employees during work.
 The companies face a fine not exceeding
  RM50,000 or imprisonment for a term not
  exceeding two years or both upon conviction.
 Housing and Local Government deputy minister
  Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin had said that the
  information in the report was classified under
  the Official Secrets Act (OSA).
 He slammed the classification of the report over
  the incident that involved public interest, adding
  that this had prevented parties affected by the
  collapse to claim for losses.
Demolition Regulation
 Demolition is dealt with under the Building
 Act 1984.
 Any person who intends to carry out the
 demolition of a building must inform the local
 authority.
 No one can start demolition work unless the
 local authority has been notified.
 It requires six weeks prior notice to be given
 to the Local Authority Building Control before
 demolition begins.
 The Local Authority Building Control may
 decide to issue a notice within six weeks on
 receipt of the notification to specify conditions
 that need to be met which may include
 precautions to protect adjoining properties
 and the public.
 Demolition work must also comply with the
 Construction (Design and Management)
 Regulations 1994 and a health and safety
 plan produced by the principal contractor.
Summary of Cases Study
  Did not get       • Still continue to the demolition process
 approval from
    DOSH.

 Not follow the
  demolition        • Building collapsed.
  regulation

         No
  compensation • The victim cannot claim their losses
                    because no approval from DOSH.
for all the victims
No           • Not consider the weight of
 responsibility
on the safety in     the crane that will effect
   workplace         the stability of the building



   The fine        • They will do the same
imposed is not
commensurate         thing again .
Pictures
Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest
METHODOLOGY
   USE TO
 ANALYSE THE
 CASE STUDY
Utilitarianism
• Definition: actions that serve to maximize human
  well-being.
    Balance the need of society with the need of
    individual and what will provide the most benefit to the
    most people.


• Good: They will built a new supermarket that
  give benefit to society (after demolition) complete
  all the necessary things in daily live.
• Bad: Environmental Issues(not follow the
  demolition regulation-collapsed)
Safety and Risk
             Safety is a value of judgment ,but precise
SAFET        because in many cases we can readily
  Y          distinguish a safe design from an unsafe One.

             Risk is a key element in engineering design
 RISK        ,it is impossible to design anything to be
             completely risk free.

              Engineer have a responsibility to ensure that their work is
              conduct in the most environmentally safe manner possible.
EXPLAINATI    there was no mention of explosives being used in the
              method statement.
   ON         The contractors structure were did not dismiss the
              possibility of the building crumbling if the wrong anchors .
Virtue Ethics
              • define as moral distinction and goodness.
 Definition



              • The engineers not monitor during demolition
                process.
              • They not consider the weight of the machine
Irresponsible • They not thinking about the environmental situation
No
            • The victims cannot claim their losses.
sympathy



            • Continue the demolition even though did
Impatient     not have approval from DOSH.


            • Do not care about their worker’s right and
Unconcern     the people around the collapsed building.
Rights Ethics
• Definition: right ethics holds that people have
  fundamental right that other people have a duty
  to respect.
• From Case Study:
  The right to have a comfortable supermarket.
  The right to pay attention to our customers or
    workers .
   cannot let our customers or workers suffer
    because of our project.
Duty Ethics
• Definition: people have duties , an
  important one is which is to protect the
  right of others
• From this case study:
      Pay the compensation to the victims.
      be honest, careful, and trustworthy.
      willingness to admit mistake.
IEEE Codes Of Ethics
 DEFINITION:
 To accept responsibility in making decisions
 consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the
 public and to disclose promptly factors that might
 endanger the public or the environment.


 RELATE TO CASE STUDY:
 The construction company should consider the
 safety of their workers and public around their
 project building .However, they didn’t consider the
 consequences if their project failure and just think
 to finish their work.
Discussion
• The government should take other pro-active
  steps to avoid future disasters.
• They seem to be charged only under OSHA if
  they are found guilty.
• The max fine is just RM50k or imprisonment for
  a term not exceeding two years or both upon
  convinction.That really is nothing for these
  companies.
• Proper risk assessment is the most fundamental
  issue of commitment to safety.
We can take a cue from neighboring Singapore.
 Singapore Building Control Act 1989
 introduced several new measures to regulate
 the construction industry.
 In regulating the design and supervision of a
 construction building, a developer must appoint
 an Accredited Checker,
 Their duties are to evaluate, analyze and
 review the structural design in the plans of any
 building works and perform such original
 calculations.
 The Accredited Checker must be independent
 in that he must have no professional or financial
 interest in the building works.
Conclusion
• In summary, we are able to see and appreciate
  that construction liability is a complex issue.
• Finding a cause of a collapse of a building is
  never easy. For most of the time it will be a
  guessing game or a process of elimination.
• With so many uncertainties and issues at
  hand, it is best for the Government to take pro-
  active steps to better regulate the construction
  industry.
• The developments in Singapore would be a
  good starting point for us to compare and
  emulate.

More Related Content

PPTX
Asas pertolongan cemas
Ibn Abdullah
 
PPT
Foundation and its types and detailed explanation
Tarun kumar
 
PPTX
DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING OF WORK
KHUSHBU SHAH
 
PDF
MENGANGKAT DAN MENGALIHKAN KEDUDUKAN
hkdt
 
PPTX
Sleepers and Ballast
T.Naga Anusha
 
PPTX
asas pertolongan cemas
siaw ong
 
PPTX
Structural and non structural measures - Disaster Management
Leema Margret A
 
PPTX
Dams & its Construction
Zakaria Yahya
 
Asas pertolongan cemas
Ibn Abdullah
 
Foundation and its types and detailed explanation
Tarun kumar
 
DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING OF WORK
KHUSHBU SHAH
 
MENGANGKAT DAN MENGALIHKAN KEDUDUKAN
hkdt
 
Sleepers and Ballast
T.Naga Anusha
 
asas pertolongan cemas
siaw ong
 
Structural and non structural measures - Disaster Management
Leema Margret A
 
Dams & its Construction
Zakaria Yahya
 

What's hot (20)

DOCX
Group Assignment:IBS System
마 이환
 
PDF
Project 1: Industrialised Building System [ IBS ]
JerotichMaswan
 
PDF
UBBL 2021.pdf
MuhammadAkram948114
 
PPTX
Site Possession
Amir Ibrahim
 
PPTX
Spun pile
Wen Crystal
 
PDF
50451783 taking-off-quantity
hlksd
 
PDF
Project Management Group Assignment Final Report
Arissa Loh
 
PPTX
bs:copbs101
Adiirfan Che-ani
 
DOCX
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTRACT FORM JKR 203A & PAM
Anep Botak
 
PDF
UBBL 1984 pdf
Joshua Lee
 
PDF
Sectional completion and partial possession by employer PP2 Coursework 1
Arissa Loh
 
PDF
Construction Contract in Malaysia
Dayat Mohamad
 
PDF
Blockwork system
Wen Crystal
 
PDF
HOW CONSERVATION WORKS TAKE PLACE IN MALAYSIA
Fakhrul Afifi
 
PPT
Defects liability
Hafizul Mukhlis
 
PDF
Measurement 4 Tender Document
xingxin_GOh
 
PPT
industrialised building systems_achah
Aisyah Asyikin
 
DOCX
Site visit report
foongmei yap
 
PDF
Earthwork
Ir. Abdul Aziz Abas
 
PDF
Assignment - Preliminary Cost Appraisal
Kai Yun Pang
 
Group Assignment:IBS System
마 이환
 
Project 1: Industrialised Building System [ IBS ]
JerotichMaswan
 
UBBL 2021.pdf
MuhammadAkram948114
 
Site Possession
Amir Ibrahim
 
Spun pile
Wen Crystal
 
50451783 taking-off-quantity
hlksd
 
Project Management Group Assignment Final Report
Arissa Loh
 
bs:copbs101
Adiirfan Che-ani
 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTRACT FORM JKR 203A & PAM
Anep Botak
 
UBBL 1984 pdf
Joshua Lee
 
Sectional completion and partial possession by employer PP2 Coursework 1
Arissa Loh
 
Construction Contract in Malaysia
Dayat Mohamad
 
Blockwork system
Wen Crystal
 
HOW CONSERVATION WORKS TAKE PLACE IN MALAYSIA
Fakhrul Afifi
 
Defects liability
Hafizul Mukhlis
 
Measurement 4 Tender Document
xingxin_GOh
 
industrialised building systems_achah
Aisyah Asyikin
 
Site visit report
foongmei yap
 
Assignment - Preliminary Cost Appraisal
Kai Yun Pang
 
Ad

Similar to Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest (20)

DOCX
ajay jain FINAL REPORT
AJAY JAIN
 
DOC
Rishabh kumar
Ashu Kumar
 
PDF
Engineering Failure(Case Study of Rana Plaza Collapse-An Example of Engineeri...
Ariful Islam
 
PDF
Constructional Techniques in 2k18
Chaitanya Shimpi
 
PDF
REPORTS ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Rising Sher
 
DOCX
Engineers in society
Azlin lolin
 
PDF
VDIS1006 RESTORATION INTERIORS LECTURE 2- OH&S FOR HERITAGE BUILDINGS
Virtu Institute
 
PDF
Research Paper
bmorissquati
 
PPT
Introduction to project management
Godfrey James
 
PPTX
roles and responsbility of engineering.pptx
srohitkumar0311
 
PDF
VDIS10011 Restoration Interiors 2 Lecture 2: OH&S for Heritage Buildings
Virtu Institute
 
PPTX
Contractor management sections 5 topics 8& 9
Michael Shellshear
 
PPTX
moulivakkam building collpse
Iftekhar Shamruz
 
PPT
Introduction to civil engineering...........
rajenkoley
 
PPT
Shiv - STAKEHOLDERS PRESENTATION FINAL REVIEW.ppt
shivkumars12
 
PDF
Dempolition notes Part 1.pdf
Canberra Institute of technology
 
PDF
1153 3330-1-pb
Dr.Madhav Prasad Koirala
 
PDF
Building Service Chapter 4
Izam Lukman
 
PDF
لماذا المهندسون لايصممون البناء ليقاوم الزلازل- - What is the meaning buildin...
Dr.Youssef Hammida
 
PDF
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND PLANNING OF BUILDING GODREJ PRAKITI PHASE-111 (HOUSEIN...
INDRANIL BANERJEE
 
ajay jain FINAL REPORT
AJAY JAIN
 
Rishabh kumar
Ashu Kumar
 
Engineering Failure(Case Study of Rana Plaza Collapse-An Example of Engineeri...
Ariful Islam
 
Constructional Techniques in 2k18
Chaitanya Shimpi
 
REPORTS ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Rising Sher
 
Engineers in society
Azlin lolin
 
VDIS1006 RESTORATION INTERIORS LECTURE 2- OH&S FOR HERITAGE BUILDINGS
Virtu Institute
 
Research Paper
bmorissquati
 
Introduction to project management
Godfrey James
 
roles and responsbility of engineering.pptx
srohitkumar0311
 
VDIS10011 Restoration Interiors 2 Lecture 2: OH&S for Heritage Buildings
Virtu Institute
 
Contractor management sections 5 topics 8& 9
Michael Shellshear
 
moulivakkam building collpse
Iftekhar Shamruz
 
Introduction to civil engineering...........
rajenkoley
 
Shiv - STAKEHOLDERS PRESENTATION FINAL REVIEW.ppt
shivkumars12
 
Dempolition notes Part 1.pdf
Canberra Institute of technology
 
1153 3330-1-pb
Dr.Madhav Prasad Koirala
 
Building Service Chapter 4
Izam Lukman
 
لماذا المهندسون لايصممون البناء ليقاوم الزلازل- - What is the meaning buildin...
Dr.Youssef Hammida
 
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND PLANNING OF BUILDING GODREJ PRAKITI PHASE-111 (HOUSEIN...
INDRANIL BANERJEE
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
3.The-Rise-of-the-Marathas.pdfppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring Soci...
Sandeep Swamy
 
PPTX
Dakar Framework Education For All- 2000(Act)
santoshmohalik1
 
PDF
2.Reshaping-Indias-Political-Map.ppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring S...
Sandeep Swamy
 
DOCX
UPPER GASTRO INTESTINAL DISORDER.docx
BANDITA PATRA
 
PDF
Landforms and landscapes data surprise preview
jpinnuck
 
PDF
Electricity-Magnetic-and-Heating-Effects 4th Chapter/8th-science-curiosity.pd...
Sandeep Swamy
 
PDF
Sunset Boulevard Student Revision Booklet
jpinnuck
 
PPTX
Tips Management in Odoo 18 POS - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
PPTX
How to Manage Leads in Odoo 18 CRM - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
PPTX
vedic maths in python:unleasing ancient wisdom with modern code
mistrymuskan14
 
PPTX
PPTs-The Rise of Empiresghhhhhhhh (1).pptx
academysrusti114
 
PPTX
CARE OF UNCONSCIOUS PATIENTS .pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
PPTX
Strengthening open access through collaboration: building connections with OP...
Jisc
 
PDF
PG-BPSDMP 2 TAHUN 2025PG-BPSDMP 2 TAHUN 2025.pdf
AshifaRamadhani
 
PDF
UTS Health Student Promotional Representative_Position Description.pdf
Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney
 
PDF
Types of Literary Text: Poetry and Prose
kaelandreabibit
 
PPT
Python Programming Unit II Control Statements.ppt
CUO VEERANAN VEERANAN
 
PPTX
An introduction to Prepositions for beginners.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
PPTX
An introduction to Dialogue writing.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
PPTX
Open Quiz Monsoon Mind Game Prelims.pptx
Sourav Kr Podder
 
3.The-Rise-of-the-Marathas.pdfppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring Soci...
Sandeep Swamy
 
Dakar Framework Education For All- 2000(Act)
santoshmohalik1
 
2.Reshaping-Indias-Political-Map.ppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring S...
Sandeep Swamy
 
UPPER GASTRO INTESTINAL DISORDER.docx
BANDITA PATRA
 
Landforms and landscapes data surprise preview
jpinnuck
 
Electricity-Magnetic-and-Heating-Effects 4th Chapter/8th-science-curiosity.pd...
Sandeep Swamy
 
Sunset Boulevard Student Revision Booklet
jpinnuck
 
Tips Management in Odoo 18 POS - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
How to Manage Leads in Odoo 18 CRM - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
vedic maths in python:unleasing ancient wisdom with modern code
mistrymuskan14
 
PPTs-The Rise of Empiresghhhhhhhh (1).pptx
academysrusti114
 
CARE OF UNCONSCIOUS PATIENTS .pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
Strengthening open access through collaboration: building connections with OP...
Jisc
 
PG-BPSDMP 2 TAHUN 2025PG-BPSDMP 2 TAHUN 2025.pdf
AshifaRamadhani
 
UTS Health Student Promotional Representative_Position Description.pdf
Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney
 
Types of Literary Text: Poetry and Prose
kaelandreabibit
 
Python Programming Unit II Control Statements.ppt
CUO VEERANAN VEERANAN
 
An introduction to Prepositions for beginners.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
An introduction to Dialogue writing.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
Open Quiz Monsoon Mind Game Prelims.pptx
Sourav Kr Podder
 

Jaya supermarket presentation 2011 latest

  • 1. JAYA SUPERMARKET COLLAPSE Group 3 Kartini Bt Muhamad Kartini Bt Ibrahim Lim Teck Chee
  • 2. Objectives To know the process and procedure involved in demolition of building. To educate people about the importance of adopting ethical conducts to prevent disastrous consequences
  • 3. Introduction  Structural demolition is defined as an operation to bring down or destruct the structure. It can be completely or partially dismantling of a structure by planned and controlled methods in order to ensure the safety of work.  Buildings, like all structures, are designed to support certain loads without deforming excessively.  The loads are the weights of people and objects, the weight of rain and snow and
  • 4. Causes of Collapse  The causes of building collapse can be classified under general headings to facilitate analysis.  These headings are: Bad Design Faulty Construction Foundation Failure Extraordinary Loads Unexpected Failure Modes Combination of Causes
  • 5. The Evaluation of Demolition Techniques  Demolition techniques for structure is greatly affected by the structure form using reinforcement concrete, pre stressed concrete, plain concrete or masonry and the size of the constructed structural.  The location of the building, range of the demolition either is whole or partial demolition, grade of safety in work and the time taken to demolish the structure will greatly affect the evaluation if demolition technique.  The evaluation of demolition method is a very
  • 6. Experience and knowledge play crucial role in demolition engineering. Those parameters will affect the decision of engineer in determine the suitable method of demolition  Many demolition techniques had invented and applied in this world such as using machinery method, hand method, chemical agent, explosion and hydraulic demolition.
  • 8. Background of Case Study  Built in 1974, it was one of the first supermarkets in Petaling Jaya and has survived the many facets of development until now.  The shopping centre was involved in a controversy in the early 1990s when it built its present 10-storey car park extension - four storeys higher than what the building plans approved by the then Petaling Jaya Municipal Council (MPPJ).  The building has four storeys of retail units, five storeys of office units and four storeys of carparks. The building has been earmarked for redevelopment, where it will be demolished and rebuilt with better-planned features like loading bays, access roads and security.
  • 9.  One of the city’s earliest landmarks, Jaya Supermarket, collapsed while demolition work was going on.  A 10-storey office block at the other end of the building was not affected.  It was on the process of the reconstruction of a four-storey complex and basement parking along Jalan Semangat.  People around there saw that six cranes falling down along with the building.  Claimed the lives of seven Indonesian construction workers. Three others were injured.
  • 10. Reasons of the Collapse • Initial investigations showed that the contractor, Pembinaan C.W Yap Sdn Bhd, did not get the greenlight from the Department Of Safety and Health (DOSH) to start demolition, although it did get approval from the Petaling Jaya City Council to carry out the work. • Investigation also state that the contractor not use the proper methods for demolish the building. • Indicated overloading caused by heavy machines may have triggered the collapse. • Eight heavy demolition tractors were in the building when the incident occurred. • Nine mini excavators were to be hoisted on the building’s two roofs — three at the ninth floor and six at the fourth floor roofs.
  • 14. Action Taken • A month after the incident, the state government blacklisted the owner and firms (6) involved in the redevelopment of the Jaya Supermarket.  Jaya Section Fourteen Sdn Bhd (land owner and developer)  DP Architects Sdn Bhd (that submitted the building plan) Meinhardht (M) Sdn Bhd (engineering company) Pembinaan CW Yap Sdn Bhd (contractor)  Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd (engineering contractor)  DLS Management (project manager).
  • 15.  Syarikat Pembinaan C.W Yap Sdn Bhd, the main contractor in charge of demolition and reconstruction at the site was charged at the Sessions Court under Section 17(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994.  Sub-contractor Lian Hup Earth Work and Construction Sdn Bhd was charged under Section 15 (1) of the same Act for failing, as employer, to ensure safety, health and welfare of all employees during work.
  • 16.  The companies face a fine not exceeding RM50,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both upon conviction.  Housing and Local Government deputy minister Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin had said that the information in the report was classified under the Official Secrets Act (OSA).  He slammed the classification of the report over the incident that involved public interest, adding that this had prevented parties affected by the collapse to claim for losses.
  • 17. Demolition Regulation  Demolition is dealt with under the Building Act 1984.  Any person who intends to carry out the demolition of a building must inform the local authority.  No one can start demolition work unless the local authority has been notified.  It requires six weeks prior notice to be given to the Local Authority Building Control before demolition begins.
  • 18.  The Local Authority Building Control may decide to issue a notice within six weeks on receipt of the notification to specify conditions that need to be met which may include precautions to protect adjoining properties and the public.  Demolition work must also comply with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994 and a health and safety plan produced by the principal contractor.
  • 19. Summary of Cases Study Did not get • Still continue to the demolition process approval from DOSH. Not follow the demolition • Building collapsed. regulation No compensation • The victim cannot claim their losses because no approval from DOSH. for all the victims
  • 20. No • Not consider the weight of responsibility on the safety in the crane that will effect workplace the stability of the building The fine • They will do the same imposed is not commensurate thing again .
  • 23. METHODOLOGY USE TO ANALYSE THE CASE STUDY
  • 24. Utilitarianism • Definition: actions that serve to maximize human well-being.  Balance the need of society with the need of individual and what will provide the most benefit to the most people. • Good: They will built a new supermarket that give benefit to society (after demolition) complete all the necessary things in daily live. • Bad: Environmental Issues(not follow the demolition regulation-collapsed)
  • 25. Safety and Risk Safety is a value of judgment ,but precise SAFET because in many cases we can readily Y distinguish a safe design from an unsafe One. Risk is a key element in engineering design RISK ,it is impossible to design anything to be completely risk free. Engineer have a responsibility to ensure that their work is conduct in the most environmentally safe manner possible. EXPLAINATI there was no mention of explosives being used in the method statement. ON The contractors structure were did not dismiss the possibility of the building crumbling if the wrong anchors .
  • 26. Virtue Ethics • define as moral distinction and goodness. Definition • The engineers not monitor during demolition process. • They not consider the weight of the machine Irresponsible • They not thinking about the environmental situation
  • 27. No • The victims cannot claim their losses. sympathy • Continue the demolition even though did Impatient not have approval from DOSH. • Do not care about their worker’s right and Unconcern the people around the collapsed building.
  • 28. Rights Ethics • Definition: right ethics holds that people have fundamental right that other people have a duty to respect. • From Case Study: The right to have a comfortable supermarket. The right to pay attention to our customers or workers .  cannot let our customers or workers suffer because of our project.
  • 29. Duty Ethics • Definition: people have duties , an important one is which is to protect the right of others • From this case study:  Pay the compensation to the victims.  be honest, careful, and trustworthy.  willingness to admit mistake.
  • 30. IEEE Codes Of Ethics DEFINITION: To accept responsibility in making decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment. RELATE TO CASE STUDY: The construction company should consider the safety of their workers and public around their project building .However, they didn’t consider the consequences if their project failure and just think to finish their work.
  • 31. Discussion • The government should take other pro-active steps to avoid future disasters. • They seem to be charged only under OSHA if they are found guilty. • The max fine is just RM50k or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both upon convinction.That really is nothing for these companies. • Proper risk assessment is the most fundamental issue of commitment to safety.
  • 32. We can take a cue from neighboring Singapore.  Singapore Building Control Act 1989 introduced several new measures to regulate the construction industry.  In regulating the design and supervision of a construction building, a developer must appoint an Accredited Checker,  Their duties are to evaluate, analyze and review the structural design in the plans of any building works and perform such original calculations.  The Accredited Checker must be independent in that he must have no professional or financial interest in the building works.
  • 33. Conclusion • In summary, we are able to see and appreciate that construction liability is a complex issue. • Finding a cause of a collapse of a building is never easy. For most of the time it will be a guessing game or a process of elimination. • With so many uncertainties and issues at hand, it is best for the Government to take pro- active steps to better regulate the construction industry. • The developments in Singapore would be a good starting point for us to compare and emulate.