Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Security of IoT Devices: A Survey

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | June 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 842
Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Security of IoT Devices: A
Survey
Dr. Subhash Chander
Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Pt. CLS Govt College Karnal, Haryana
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT:
In a new computing world called “Internet of Things (IoT)”
or “ Smart Objects ” networks, a lot of devices are
connected to the Internet. They interact with each other
through the network and give a new experience to us. In
order to enjoy this new context, security of constrained
end point is important. However, the network might be
suffered seriously, If one of the end points were
compromised. Still, it is not easy to apply sufficient
cryptographic functions on constrained resources due to
the limitation of their resources [1]. In this paper, a short
discussion on the different IoT applications and challenges
has been done. Further, the security worries concerning
information sharing and following have been included. A
comparable assessment of various lightweight encryption
and approval estimations is finished. Also, some
assessment headings described which further work ought
to be adopted on lightweight cryptography estimations [2].
Keywords- IoT Security, Cryptography, Internet of
Things, Lightweight Ciphers, Privacy.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Cryptography is that the preparation and examination of
hiding information. It is the investigation of further
developing messages to approach them secure and
impenetrable to attack. In cryptography, the primary
message is changed over into other message at encryption
side and changed over into a special message at the
gatherer side. For obliged devices, normal cryptography
estimations can be unnecessarily drowsy, excessively huge
or too energy-consuming. The term light-weight
cryptography focuses on new estimations to beat this
issue. Light-weight cryptography is for the most part
characterized as cryptography for asset obliged gadgets,
for which RFID labels and WSN are commonly referenced
as specific illustrations. Light-weight encryption is an
intersection of two terms "Light and weight", and it is an
area of an old-style cryptographic calculation. Light-weight
encryption and decoding are executed on stages as well as
equipment and programming. In
this paper, present breaking down study on
the common use of recent stuff H/ W and software S/
W performances of symmetric as well as asymmetric
ciphers( 3).
The Internet of Things (IoT) being a promising
development addressing things to come should interact
with billions of devices or gadgets. The extended number
of correspondence should deliver heaps of data and the
security of data can be a risk. The contraptions in the plan
are essentially more humble in size and low fuel. Standard
encryption estimations are generally computationally
exorbitant on account of their unpredictability and require
many rounds to scramble, essentially wasting the obliged
energy of the contraptions. Less stunning estimation, in
any case, may mull over needed decency [4].
This paper will contains sections as follows :
The Section 1 covers an Introduction to IoT and its
Architecture, Applications, and Challenges. Section 2
covers the overview of Lightweight Cryptography, section
3 covers about the Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms.
Section 4: Related work and literature survey on
lightweight cryptography algorithms for IoT security.
Section 5 provides the information related to analysis on
lightweight cryptography algorithms for iot security
analysis. Section 6 introduces the conclusions related to
this work. Section 7 describes the Future Scope related to
the review.
1.1 IoT ARCHITECTURE [2] :
Three Layer Four Layer Five Layer
Physical/Perception
Layer
Smart cards, RFID
Tags, Sensors
Data
Perception
Layer
RFID tags, 3G
Phones,
Sensor
Embedded
Devices
Perception
Layer Physical
Objects, RFID,
Barcode,
Infrared
Sensors.
Network Layer
Secure Transmission,
3G, UMTS, WiFi,
Bluetooth, Infrared,
Zigbee
Heterogeneou
s Network
AccessLayer
Wireless links,
GSM, WCDMA,
WiFi, Zigbee
Network
Layer 3G,
WiFi,
Bluetooth,
Zigbee
Infrared
Technology

Data
Management
Layer
Cloud
Computing
Centers, Web
service servers,
management
servers
Processing
Layer
Database,
Ubiquitous
Computing,
Service
Management,
Info Processing
Application Layer
Smart Applications
and Management
Intelligent
Service Layer
Intelligent
Applications as
in agriculture,
environment,
smart cities etc
Application
Layer
Intelligent
systems,
devices,
Applications in
various
Domains
Business
Layer Business
Models,
Graphs, System
Management
1.2 IoT APPLICATIONS:
1.2.1 Home Automation System:
Home Automation System are where one have some
control over the electronic things in their home by means
of their cell phones and PCs in this way making a
framework that empowers a savvy home. It additionally
gives the office of identifying crises; keep up with energy
utilization inside the house, and so forth.
1.2.2 Intelligent Transportation System:
Intelligent Transportation System in which traffic
observing should be possible, mishaps, gridlocks and
infringement of traffic rules can be accounted for to
specialists.
1.2.3 Prediction of natural disasters and reporting
critical temperature changes:
The Prediction of natural disasters by consistent observing
of climate utilizing sensors. Checking Environmental
conditions like estimating level of poisonous gases in the
air, and the content of harmful material in water.
1.2.4 Healthcare Facilities:
Healthcare facilities can be given like remote checking of
patients, consistent observing of well-being boundaries
and exercises, support for autonomous living, observing
medications admission by the patient, and some more.
1.2.5 Surveillance and Tracking:
Surveillance and tracking individuals, articles and
creatures, examining spaces and abandoned regions,
upkeep of framework and hardware, disturbing
frameworks and a lot more offices have become
conceivable with IoTs [2].
Fig: IoT Applications
1.3 IoT Challenges
The authors, M. Chiang and T. Zhang, in [5], discussed
about how fog computing can figure out many of IoT
challenges.
1.3.1 Latency Constraints: If the information began by
IoTs expected to send at cloud for practicing and
stockpiling then it consumes additional time, which isn't
reasonable for continuous applications like brilliant traffic
the executives. To manage latency limitations application
is the test for IoT. As the haze performs calculation near
end clients ,it is great for time delicate application.
1.3.2 Uninterrupted Services: To offer continuous types
of assistance to IoT is the huge test. Notwithstanding of
having unpredictable organization accessibility to the
cloud, the mist processing can run alone to guarantee
unending functionalities regardless.
1.3.3 IoT Security Challenges: With the fast enlarging of
IoT everything is being savvy. These shrewd gadgets
create an enormous measure of information (counting
individual data). Security and protection of this security
delicate information and individual data is a major test.
Since IoT gadgets have extremely less power and memory,
conventional security instruments, for example, a
cryptographic capacity, which requires complex
computations can't be executed at the asset - obliged IoT
gadget. Be that as it may, the security and protection
related issues have not been proficiently perceived in haze

figuring. We are currently toward the starting period of
exploration on the protection and security related issues
of haze processing.
1.3.4 IoT Privacy: As articles are becoming recognizable
through IoT, protection related dangers have expanded
complex. Getting information is significant so it isn't
abused by any third individual. Regardless of this, issues
connected with information proprietorship ought to
likewise be tended to. To cause the client to feel great in
being essential for the IoT framework measures should be
taken. The responsibility for data gathered from various
smart objects should be particularly settled. The
proprietor should be ensured that the information won't
be utilized without their assent, explicitly when it will be
shared over the web [9].
Fig: Trust Areas in Security
2. LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHY
Light-weight cryptography is the part of another
cryptography, which is cover cryptographic calculations
planned for involving in unavoidable gadgets with low
assets. LWC doesn't find extreme rules for grouping a
cryptographic calculation as light-weight, however the
normal face of light-weight calculations are exceptionally
low necessities to primary assets for target gadgets.
Underneath make sense of momentarily the two sorts of
lightweight cryptography (symmetric and Asymmertic).
The accompanying variables on the execution are expected
for lightweight cryptography.
 Size (circuit size, ROM/RAM sizes)
 Power
 Power consumption
 Processing speed (throughput, delay)
Below Fig illustrates the block diagram of light-weight
cryptography (LWC )[3].
Fig: Block Diagram of Lightweight Cryptography
The ongoing cryptographic natives can be separated into
two classes. Deviated key cryptography and Symmetric
key cryptography.
A. Asymmetric or Unbalanced Key Cryptography:
Asymmetric or Unbalanced key cryptography is known as
open key cryptography, on the grounds that in this
procedure, a couple of public key and confidential key are
required. As of late the focal point of lightweight
cryptography moved towards topsy-turvy key
cryptography, however the outcomes are not yet
consistent and productive like symmetric key
cryptography.
Lightweight Asymmetric cryptography are perplexing
concerning activity and are not time productive. The size
of the operands and persistent development of assault
models are likewise making these calculations defenceless
[6].
Fig: Asymmetric Cryptography
B. Symmetric Key Cryptography:
Symmetric key cryptography is known as shared key
cryptography or secret key. In this cycle, a sender and a

receiver both offer a typical key through secret
correspondence for both encryption and unscrambling.
Symmetric cryptography is more reasonable for IoT
applications as a result of its quick tasks which are for the
most part XOR and stages. The handling speed is quicker
and they don't utilize numerous assets [7].
Fig: Symmetric Cryptography
2.1 CHALLENGES IN LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHY:
Lightweight cryptography focuses on an exceptionally wide
assortment of asset compelled gadgets, for example, IoT
end hubs and RFID labels [6] that can be executed on both
equipment and programming with various correspondence
innovations. It is undeniably challenging for asset
restricted climate to execute the standard cryptographic
calculations because of the execution size, speed or
throughput and energy utilization. The lightweight
cryptography compromises execution cost, speed, security,
execution and energy utilization on asset restricted
gadgets. The inspiration of lightweight cryptography is to
utilize less memory, less figuring asset and less power
supply to give security arrangement that can work over
asset restricted gadgets. The lightweight cryptography is
normal easier and quicker contrasted with ordinary
cryptography. The burden of lightweight cryptography is
less gotten [8].
3. LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHY ALGORITHMS:
Lightweight Cryptography (LWC) is a cryptography field
that spotlights on quick turn of events and productive
cryptographic strategies for asset obliged conditions that
can supplant the customary computationally costly ones
while accomplishing a satisfactory degree of safety [10].
Lightweight arrangements are intended to be lighter
concerning their key size, memory necessities, and
execution time. This works with lesser assets for utilized
contrasted with heavyweight arrangements. There are no
obliged necessities for any lightweight calculation to fit in;
be that as it may, the key size, block size, code measures,
clock cycles, and significantly more are given higher
significance. The objective of making a lightweight
calculation configuration is to think twice about factors
like low asset prerequisites, execution, and cryptographic
strength of the calculation.
3.1 Requirements of LWC
It is based on the plan difficulties, the lightweight
calculations are indented to utilize more modest block
sizes (32, 48, or 64 pieces) than a customary code, which
has a bigger block size (64 or 128 pieces). LWC likewise
utilizes more modest key sizes (under 96 pieces). The
most un-key size, as per NIST, is 112 pieces. In ISO/IEC
29192, lightweight properties are nitty gritty laid out on
their objective stages. Lightweight properties of
equipment, right off the bat, are assessed by fundamental
measures, for example, chip size and energy utilization.
Furthermore, RAM size with more modest code is leaned
toward for lightweight applications in programming
executions.
3.2 Design considerations of LWC
The Design considerations of LWC are as following:
 A diminishing in the algorithm’s fundamental factors like
block size, key length, and the calculation's inner state
can cause security issues, for example, CBC disintegrates
and beast force key assaults.
 Lightweight calculations ought to be based upon
components that are generally utilized and completely
broke down.
 Changes with worked on layers like diminishing the ROM
prerequisites.
 Utilization of useful parts like information subordinate
piece following, shift registers, minimal expense, and a
lot more.
 Planning less complex key timetables that can determine
sub-keys quickly forward or in reverse.
 Applying essential tasks with a more critical number of
rounds.
 Utilizing tasks as per the assets accessible on the
objective stage that permit execution compromises.
3.3. Why lightweight cryptography is required for
IoT?
Lightweight cryptography is required for IoT because of
the accompanying reasons:

3.3.1 Efficient end-to-end communication:
End nodes should be furnished with a symmetric key
calculation for accomplishing start to finish security. For
asset compelled IoT gadgets, having a cryptographic
activity with less asset consumption is urgent. Carrying
out a lightweight symmetric key calculation on end
gadgets consumes less energy.
3.3.2 Resource-Constrained devices:
The lightweight cryptographic natives consume more
modest space than customary natives. Consequently,
lightweight cryptographic natives would open the
probability of more organization associations even with
asset compelled gadgets [26].
4. RELATED WORK AND LITERATURE SURVEY ON
LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHY ALGORITHMS
FOR IOT SECURITY
This section will giving the connected works in
information encryption for IoT applications. Writing
shows concentrates on power utilization, handling speed,
parcel size, information types, and torrential slide impact
in information encryption for IoT applications.
According to Gartner report (Stamford 2013), IoT can
deliver in excess of a 300 billion US dollar income in 2020,
barring cell phones, tablets, and PCs. Furthermore, by
2020, measures of cell phones and tablets arrived at over
7.3 billion units. For countless information
correspondence over the organization, a perplexing and
enormous organization will be made. Numerous web
based applications have been presented, like internet
shopping, moment installment, and electronic bill
installment. Other than web applications, a few new ideas
are arising in Cryptocurrency, Blockchain, and the Internet
of Things (IoT).
In an IoT climate, the interest for utilizing the fitting
cryptographic arrangement is expanding. By the by, on
account of the restricted battery duration, low power
calculation, little memory, restricted power supply, and
little size of the edge gadgets endure impediments in
applying cryptography. An ordinary cryptographic crude
may not be reasonable for these low-fueled edge gadgets.
For example, a RFID tag can't utilize a 1204-piece RSA
calculation because of an absence of assets [13]. The
ongoing savvy industry requires a smart cryptographic
arrangement that can give satisfactory security execution
in unavoidable registering and just asset restricted edge
gadgets.
The assessment of lightweight codes, Software
Implementation for remote sensor networks is finished,
the creators produce an execution of lightweight block
figures including KLEIN-80, TWINE-80, Piccolo-80, SPECK
(64,96) and SIMON(64,96) are carried out on the
Atmega128 processor in re-enactment climate of AVR
studio 5.1.The assessment shows that the SPECK(64,96)
figure has been the best worth according to the point of
view of energy and is suitable for remote sensor
organization (WSN) with the fundamental necessity of
energy [10].
A light-weight cryptographic calculation for the web of
thing (IoT) named as the safe web of thing SIT. The
proposed calculations are intended for the web of thing to
think about the wellbeing and assets use difficulties. The
engineering of proposed calculation presented simple
construction appropriate for executing on the web of thing
climate. A great deal of notable block figure including AES
(Rijndael), 3-Wa, SAFER, SHARK, Grasshopper PRESENT,
and Square use Substitution Permutation SP NW. different
elective rounds of replacement and rendering fulfill
Shannon's disarray in addition to dispersion properties
which guarantee that the code text is changed in a pseudo
irregular manner. Other normal codes including SF,
Blowfish, Camelia, and information encryption standard
utilize the Feistel engineering. One of the fundamental
benefits of utilizing Feistel engineering is that the
encryption in addition to unscrambling methods is
practically equivalent. A proposed calculation is a
crossover approach based Feistel in addition to
Substitution-Permutation SP organizations. In this
manner, making utilization of properties of the two ways
to deal with further develop a light-weight calculation that
presents significant security in the web of thing climate
while keeping the computational intricacy at the gentle
level [11].
The authors Abebe Abeshu Diro ,Yunyoung Nam and
Naveen Chilamkurti proposed a Proxy re-encryption
utilizing Eliptic bend cryptography to address the security
difficulties of asset obliged IOT gadgets by offloading
cryptographic computations at Fog hubs. In disseminated
climate as IoTs ,Proxy re-encryption, presented by
Bleumer, Strauss and Blaze , is a new encipher strategy to
give security. In this encryption method, a middle of the
road or facilitator hub, for instance, haze hub is outfitted
with some key K1,K2 .These keys enables the haze hubs to
decipher unique message PT encoded with the public key
PUK1 of a client into an encryption of a similar message PT
under an alternate public key PUK2 without releasing the
items in message to the moderate haze hub and mystery
key to any of the conveying substances. This method helps
in settling stockpiling limitations and key administration
issues. There are five principal methodology of
intermediary re-encryption like Key age, Client encryption,
Fog re-encryption, Fog unscrambling and Client decoding.
The security plot is executed by the creators in JAVA
utilizing nics-crypto and probed a laptop(Intel® Core of

32GB RAM) .It expects to carry out on genuine stages ,for
instance, Arduino and raspberry[12].
To give start to finish security to any correspondence
fundamental three security i.e, CIA (C-secrecy, I-Integrity,
A-Authentication) prerequisites ought to be satisfied.
Nadeem Abbas, Muhammad Asim, Noshina Tariq, Thar
Baker, and Sohail Abbas ,the authors in [14], proposed
an original FSS-Fog security administration utilizing two
cryptographic plans, Identity based computerized mark
and Identity based encryption .It has been expected by the
creators that all IoT gadgets are doled out some info
security boundaries ,for instance, particular ID,username
and secret word. The verifier at the haze layer, validates,
the shipper by these boundaries (IDrec ). A little size key
Ksmall of 128 bit is produced by the IoT gadget, who needs
to speak with haze layer. The creators utilized hilter kilter
encryption (RSA public key calculation) for the public key
encryption. The gadget encodes the critical Ksmall with
the assistance of haze layer public key and consolidates
both enciphered IDrec alongside nonce and Ksmall. Thus,
the IoT gadget sends the code message C to the haze layer
for the verification [14].
5. LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHY ALGORITHMS FOR IOT SECURITY ANLYSIS [2]:
Ref. Algorith
m
Key Size (bits)
Block Size
(bits)Rounds
Structur
e
Performance Merits Attacks/Analysis
Tech.
( M)
Power
( W)
Area
(GE)
Throughp
ut
At
100Khz
(Kbps)
[16] AES 128 128 10 SPN 0.13 2.48 2400 56.64 Upholds bigger
key sizes,
quicker in both
equipment and
programming.
Related key
assault,
Boomerang,
Biclique
cryptanalysis
[17] PRESENT 80 64 32 SPN 0.18 1.54 1030 12.4 Ultra
Lightweight
code, Energy
proficient.
Necessary,
Bottleneck assaults,
shortened
differential
cryptanalysis, Side-
channel assaults
128 0.18 2.00 1339 12.12
[18] RECTANG
LE
128 64 26 SPN 0.13 1.78 1787 246 Quick
executions
utilizing bit cut
strategies
slide assault, related-
key cryptanalysis,
measurable
Saturation Attack
[19] HIGHT 128 64 32 FN 0.25 5.48 3048 188.20 Super
lightweight,
gives high
security, great
for RFID
labeling.
Unimaginable
differential
assault on 26th
round,Biclique
cryptanalysis
[20] CLEFIA 128 128 18 FN 0.13 2.48 2488 39 Has quick
encryption and
unscrambling,
lesser rounds,
energy
productive
Key Recovery
Attack on tenth
round, Saturation
Cryptanalysis

[21] CAMELLIA 128 128 18,
24
SPN - 1.54 6511 290.1 Protection from
savage power
assault on keys,
security levels
similar to AES.
Reserve timing
assaults ,
Impossible
differential assault
[22] TWINE 80,
128
64 36 FN 0.09 1.30 1866 178 Great for little
equipment,
productive
programming
execution
Compromise
assaults, Saturation
Attack
[23] SIMON 128 128 64 SPN 0.13 1.32 1317 22.9 Upholds a few
key sizes,
performs well
in Hardware
Differential
shortcoming
assaults, Attacks on
diminished
variants
[23] SPECK 128 128 32 SPN 0.13 1.40 1396 12.1 Performs better
in
programming
Key Recovery,
Boomerang assault
6. CONCLUSION:
The objective of lightweight cryptography (LWC) is to
give security and protection in asset compelled
applications, implanted frameworks, Internet-of-Things
(IoT), and digital actual frameworks, including Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID) frameworks, remote
sensor organizations, vehicle specially appointed
organizations, and medical care. Web of Things has been
quickly tracking down its way through our current life
and is planning to work on the personal satisfaction by
associating us with many savvy gadgets, innovations, and
applications. The IoT will have total computerization of
everything around us. Albeit a lot of assessment has been
done in the IoT, yet there is another thing to research in
it. The rising thought of adventures and lawmaking
bodies in this development has provoked a wide spread
research and achieved various successful errands. A
piece of the challenges in IoTs like the general designing,
security and assurance concerns surely stick out, while
others concern like openness, constancy, execution of the
sagacious devices really require more thought. Likewise
this paper presented an outline of light-weight
cryptography execution and had drawn about the
different very lightweight block calculates whose goal is
to programme and gear successful.
7. FUTURE SCOPE:
From the overview and relative investigation, the
accompanying examination issues are found on which
further work should be possible.
1. In IoT, information security and verification is a major
concern so quantities of methods are proposed in which
cross breed models of encryption and validation
calculations are made (like hybridization of AES and RSA
strategy) yet this causes expansion in the memory
necessity on the gadgets. To counter this issue, the
encryption calculations are worked in CCM mode which
gives security as well as confirmation.
2. In the lightweight code to give similar degree of safety
as in ordinary code, the quantity of rounds expanded.
The huge number of rounds debases the presentation.
Thus, the future exploration bearing is plan lightweight
code, for example, way that it gives quick disarray and
dispersion in less number of rounds.
3. The RSA and ECC calculations numerical displaying in
light of discrete logarithm and particular number
juggling. These demonstrating incorporate enormous
number of duplication activity. Thus, research heading is
to utilize Vedic Multiplier (like UT and NDD Vedas)
instead of ordinary multiplier for quick reaction.

8. REFERENCES:
[1] Hassan, A. (2021).Lightweight Cryptography for the
Internet of Things. Advances in Intelligent Systems and
Computing,1290,780–795.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63092-8_52
[2] I. Bhardwaj, A. Kumar and M. Bansal, "A review on
lightweight cryptography algorithms for data security
and authentication in IoTs," 2017 4th International
Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control
(ISPCC), 2017, pp. 504-509, doi:
10.1109/ISPCC.2017.8269731.
[3] S. B. Sadkhan and A. O. Salman, "A survey on
lightweight-cryptography status and future
challenges," 2018 International Conference on Advance of
Sustainable Engineering and its Application (ICASEA),
2018, pp. 105-108, doi: 10.1109/ICASEA.2018.8370965.
[4] Usman, Muhammad, Irfan Ahmed, M. Imran Aslam,
Shujaat Khan, and Usman Ali Shah. "SIT: a lightweight
encryption algorithm for secure internet of things." arXiv
preprint arXiv:1704.08688 (2017).
[5] N. A. Gunathilake, W. J. Buchanan and R. Asif, "Next
Generation Lightweight Cryptography for Smart IoT
Devices: : Implementation, Challenges and Applications,"
2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-
IoT), 2019, pp. 707-710, doi: 10.1109/WF-
IoT.2019.8767250.
[6] I. K. Dutta, B. Ghosh, and M. Bayoumi, “Lightweight
cryptography for internet of insecure things: A survey,”
2019 IEEE 9th Annu. Comput. Commun. Work. Conf.
CCWC 2019, no. January, pp. 475–481, 2019, doi:
10.1109/CCWC.2019.8666557.
[7] S. Chandra, S. Paira, S. S. Alam, and G. Sanyal, “A
comparative survey of symmetric and asymmetric key
cryptography,” 2014 Int. Conf. Electron. Commun.
Comput. Eng. ICECCE 2014, pp. 83–93, 2014.
[8] Mouha N. The design space of lightweight
cryptography. NIST Light Cryptogr Work. 2015;2015:1–
19.
[9] R. Roman et al., “Securing the Internet of Things,” in
IEEE Computers, 2011, vol. 44(9), pp. 51–58
[10] J. Hosseinzadeh, A. Ghaemi, “Software
Implementation And Evaluation of Lightweight
Symmetric Block Ciphers Of The Energy Perspectives
And Memory,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
ENGINEERING EDUCATION (IJEE) ISSN: 0949-149X
www.sweetmaxwell.org March- April 2017 Vole 9, No
2017.
[11] M. Usman., I. Ahmed , M. Imran , S. Khan, U. Ali , “SIT:
A Lightweight Encryption Algorithm for Secure Internet
of Things,” (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced
Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2017.
[12] Abebe Abeshu Diro , Naveen Chilamkurti ,Yunyoung
Nam, :Analysis of Lightweight Encryption Scheme for
Fog-to-Things Communication, IEEE Access, Volume 6
(2018).
[13] B. Padmavathi and S. Ranjitha Kumari, “A survey on
performance analysis of DES, AES and RSA algorithm
along with LSB substitution,” International Journal of
Science and Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 170–174, 2013.
[14] Nadeem Abbas, Muhammad Asim, Noshina Tariq,
Thar Baker, and Sohail Abbas , :A Mechanism for
Securing IoT –enabled Applications at the Fog Layer,
Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks(JSAN), Volume
8, Issue 1 ( 2019)
[15] R. Hassan, A. S. Ahmed, and N. E. Osman, “Enhancing
security for IPv6 neighbor discovery protocol using
cryptography,” American Journal of Applied Sciences,
vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1472–1479, 2014.
[16] A. Moradi et al., “Pushing the Limits: A Very
Compact and a Threshold Implementation of AES,” in
Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2011 Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2011, vol. 6632, pp.
69-88.
[17] A. Bogdanov et al., “PRESENT: An Ultra-Lightweight
Block Cipher,” in Cryptographic Hardware and
Embedded Systems - CHES 2007 Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, Springer, 2007, pp. 450-466.
[18] W. Zhang et al., “RECTANGLE: a bit-slice lightweight
block cipher suitable for multiple platforms,” in Science
China Information Sciences, 2015, vol. 58(12), pp. 1-15.
[19] D. Hong et al., “HIGHT: A New Block Cipher Suitable
for Low- Resource Device,” in Cryptographic Hardware
and Embedded Systems - CHES 2006 Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, 2006, pp. 46-59.
[20] T. Akishita and H. Hiwatari, “Very Compact
Hardware Implementations of the Blockcipher CLEFIA,”
in Selected Areas in Cryptography Lecture Notes in
Computer Science,Springer, 2012, pp. 278-292.
[21] A. Satoh and S. Morioka, “Hardware-Focused
Performance Comparison for the Standard Block Ciphers
AES, Camellia, and Triple-DES,” in Lecture Notes in
Computer Science Information Security, Springer, 2003,
pp. 252-266.

[22] P. Kumarkushwaha et al., “A Survey on Lightweight
Block Ciphers,” inInternational Journal of Computer
Applications, 2014, vol. 96(17), pp. 1-7.
[23] R. Beaulieu et al., “The SIMON and SPECK
lightweight block ciphers,” in Proceedings of the 52nd
Annual Design Automation Conference, 2015, pp. 1-6.
[24] Kumar, S.A., Vealey, T. and Srivastava, H., 2016,
January. Security in internet of things: Challenges,
solutions and future directions. In 2016 49th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)
(pp. 5772-5781). IEEE.
[25] Shamala, Mary & Godandapani, Zayaraz &
Vivekanandan, Kaniappan & Vijayalakshmi, V.. (2021).
Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Internet of
Things enabled Networks: An Overview. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series. 1717. 012072.
10.1088/1742-6596/1717/1/012072.
[26] Alaba, F.A., Othman, M., Hashem, I.A.T. and Alotaibi,
F., 2017. Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of
Network and Computer Applications, 88, pp.10-28.

Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Security of IoT Devices: A Survey

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Security of IoT Devices: A Survey (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Security of IoT Devices: A Survey