SlideShare a Scribd company logo
EV Charging Signing Rec Practices
On October 24, 2013, the governors of eight states signed a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) committing to coordinated action to ensure the successful implementation of their
state zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) programs. ZEVs include pure battery-electric vehicles,
plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. Collectively, these
states are committed to having at least 3.3 million ZEVs operating on their roadways by
2025. The MOU identifies joint cooperative actions the signatory states will undertake, and
additional actions that individual jurisdictions are considering, to build a robust market for
ZEVs.
The MOU created a multi-state ZEV Program Implementation Task Force and called for the
development of the Multi-State ZEV Action Plan. The Task Force, composed of state officials,
serves as a forum for coordination and collaboration on the full range of program
development, support, and implementation issues to promote effective and efficient
implementation of ZEV regulatory initiatives. NESCAUM, a nonprofit association of state
environmental agencies, serves as the facilitator and provides technical and policy assistance
to the Task Force. The Multi-State ZEV Action Plan provides additional detail and specificity
to the commitments in the MOU and is intended to assist in developing consistent and
complementary measures within and across our states to foster efficient market
development and maximize the ownership experience for consumers.
This report was developed by the Task Force’s ZEV Infrastructure Planning Implementation
Team. The Task Force would like to thank Ashley Horvat, formerly of the Oregon
Department of Transportation, and Sarah McKearnan of the Vermont Agency of Natural
Resources for their leadership as co-chairs of the Team; Elaine O’Grady as lead NESCAUM
staff; representatives on the Team from state transportation agencies, including Barbara
Abrahamer of the New York State Department of Transportation, Gina Campoli of VTrans,
Steve Cliff of CalTrans, and Rick Hanley of the Connecticut Department of Transportation;
and staff from the Federal Highway Administration for their assistance and input, especially
Diane Turchetta and Kevin Sylvester.
A key action in the Multi-State
Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV)
Action Plan is to provide clear and
accurate signing to direct ZEV
drivers to refueling and charging
stations and dedicated parking
sites. This document identifies
recommended practices for
implementing the actions in the
Multi-State ZEV Action Plan related to electric vehicle charging signing. Uniform signing
will help plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) drivers easily locate charging stations.
In general, two basic types of signs are needed for electric vehicle charging stations:
directional signs and regulatory signs. Directional signs are used to safely guide PEV
drivers to charging stations. These signs can also help to increase general public
awareness of PEVs as a transportation option and improve range confidence for PEV
drivers. Regulatory signs are used to convey restrictions related to charging and associated
parking, such as time or access limits (e.g., no parking unless the vehicle is charging).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is charged with setting national standards
for traffic control devices, including all signs, signals, markings, and other devices used to
regulate, warn, or guide traffic, installed on any street, highway, bikeway, or private road
open to public travel. These standards are established by rulemaking and set forth in the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD). There have
been significant developments in the PEV market since the MUTCD was last revised in
2009. Therefore, as discussed in more detail below, the FHWA has issued two
memorandums to establish polices on signing for electric vehicle charging stations.

To direct PEV drivers to electric vehicle charging stations, the current edition of the
MUTCD, which was released in 2009, allows transportation agencies to install a general
service symbol that consists of a representation of a fuel pump and hose that
1
______________________________________
1
FHWA, Interim Approval for Optional Use of an Alternative Electric Vehicle Charging General Service Symbol
Sign (Apr. 1, 2011), available at: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia13/
2
See http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ialistreq.htm#ia13
incorporates the legend EV. In response to concerns that this symbol could be
confusing to drivers, the FHWA issued an interim approval in April 2011 for the
optional use of an alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol that
incorporates a representation of an electrical cord (see figure below) rather than a fuel
pump and hose.1
The FHWA’s interim approval does not compel use of the
alternative electric vehicle charging general service
symbol but allows transportation agencies to request
approval to use this symbol until the MUTCD is revised
and may continue to use the alternate symbol thereafter if
it is included in the revised MUTCD. The FHWA
anticipates that the next revision of the MUTCD will
include an option to use the alternative electric vehicle
charging general service symbol as a standard sign. To
complete a rulemaking to revise the MUTCD, it will take
the FHWA approximately two years from the time that a
Notice of Proposed Amendment is released for public
comment.
In the meantime, to ensure that signing directing drivers to electric vehicle charging
stations is clear and consistent, the recommended practice is to use the alternative
electric vehicle charging general service symbol. The FHWA will grant interim approval
to any state transportation agency that submits a request to the Office of
Transportation Operations. A short letter making the request will suffice, and the
FHWA typically grants requests for interim approval within a few days. As a condition
of interim approval, the FHWA requires jurisdictions that use the alternate sign to keep
track of the locations where the signs are installed. As of June 1, 2015, the FHWA has
granted interim approval to the following states: California, Connecticut, Illinois,
Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia, and
Washington.2
D9-11b (Alternate)
2

When using signs to direct drivers to charging stations, a recommended practice is to
use an all-word “FAST” plaque (see figure below and attachments for design
specifications) in conjunction with the alternative electric vehicle charging station
general service symbol to indicate when a charging station
includes a DC fast charger. Note that any necessary state
approvals should be obtained prior to using such a plaque.3
The use of a “FAST” plaque will clearly identify for PEV drivers
EV charging stations that include a DC fast charger from those
that do not.

The current edition of the MUTCD does not include any standards for signs installed for
electric vehicle charging facilities at on-street parking locations or other parking
facilities. Such signs are sometimes needed, for example, to convey parking restrictions
and facilitate enforcement. To promote uniformity among jurisdictions, the FHWA
issued a memorandum in June 20134 that recommends a number of signs and optional
plaques that may be used by state and local transportation agencies for this purpose
until the FHWA establishes standard signs in the next edition of the MUTCD. The FHWA
expects to include such signs in the next revision of the MUTCD, which will take
approximately two years from the time a Notice of Proposed Amendment is released for
public comment. In the meantime, following the FHWA’s recommendations will ensure
that regulatory signs for EV charging stations and parking spaces are uniform and
consistent and comply with the requirements of the MUTCD. The figure below is an
example of one of the signs recommended by the FHWA.
______________________________________
3
For example, California approved the use of a “FAST” header plaque in the California Department of Transpor-
tation Traffic Operations Policy Directive #13-01, available at: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/
interim_approval/ialistreq.htm#ia13
4
FHWA, Regulatory Signs for Electric Vehicle Charging and Parking Facilities (June 17, 2013), available at:
http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/policy/rsevcpfmemo/
3
It is important to note that only word legends may be used on signs
and plaques for on-street electric vehicle charging and parking sites
because, according to the FHWA, no symbol has been developed and
tested to ensure that it effectively conveys the regulations associated
with electric vehicle charging and associated parking sites. However,
to clearly identify a charging site, the alternative electric vehicle
charging general service symbol may be posted at a charging site
along with regulatory signs and plaques. If posted together, the
alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol should be
posted above the regulatory sign to make it easier for drivers to see
and locate the charging station.
The MUTCD and related FHWA policies apply to public parking areas such as on-street
parking, rest areas, park and rides, etc. While the MUTCD does not legally apply to
parking areas that are separated from public roads, such as parking lots and garages,
providing consistency will help all drivers to recognize and understand electric vehicle
charging station signs. In addition, some states require that signs installed on private
roadways and parking areas conform to the MUTCD to be enforceable, which is a good
practice to promote uniform signing. Lastly, to insure that signs comply with State
statutes and are enforceable, coordination with the applicable state transportation
agency and/or other signing regulatory body is advised.
4
Appendix A:
5
6
7

More Related Content

PDF
Aug7_2012_and_what_is_ARNOLD
PDF
Transportation Spending Under an Earmark Ban
PDF
Alabama State Bridge Profile
DOCX
Truck lawdev2013
PDF
Heavy Vehicle Use Tax Form 2290
PDF
TechComm Industry Update ~ September 27, 2012
PDF
Esoko
Aug7_2012_and_what_is_ARNOLD
Transportation Spending Under an Earmark Ban
Alabama State Bridge Profile
Truck lawdev2013
Heavy Vehicle Use Tax Form 2290
TechComm Industry Update ~ September 27, 2012
Esoko

What's hot (19)

PDF
Regional road safety action plan eng
PDF
Bulgaria power-sector-rapid-assessment may27-final
PDF
CR parking analysis
PDF
Audit of the Oregon Department of Transportation
PDF
Utah State Bridge Profile
PDF
Maine State Bridge Profile
PDF
839- Health of Urban Road -Digitaly Published Paper IRF 2017
PDF
Oklahoma State Bridge Profile
PPTX
Off Road Vehicle Management Framework (June 2011)
PDF
Investing in Washington State Transportation: Driving Economic Growth
PDF
STN pdvWireless Blog Post 9-15-15
PDF
The Honolulu Rail Project - RECLAMA Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz - Reality for...
DOCX
From centralised long-term planning to market-based access: Proposed change i...
PDF
Brief: Services and Investment In The EPA
PDF
Annual Report 2009
PDF
ENTRO-Executive-Summary-final
PDF
Pricewaterhouse coopers -_ambulance_service_of_nsw_funding_model_-_a_comparis...
PPTX
New guidelines for the transportation industry
Regional road safety action plan eng
Bulgaria power-sector-rapid-assessment may27-final
CR parking analysis
Audit of the Oregon Department of Transportation
Utah State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge Profile
839- Health of Urban Road -Digitaly Published Paper IRF 2017
Oklahoma State Bridge Profile
Off Road Vehicle Management Framework (June 2011)
Investing in Washington State Transportation: Driving Economic Growth
STN pdvWireless Blog Post 9-15-15
The Honolulu Rail Project - RECLAMA Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz - Reality for...
From centralised long-term planning to market-based access: Proposed change i...
Brief: Services and Investment In The EPA
Annual Report 2009
ENTRO-Executive-Summary-final
Pricewaterhouse coopers -_ambulance_service_of_nsw_funding_model_-_a_comparis...
New guidelines for the transportation industry
Ad

Viewers also liked (10)

PDF
LACity Suitability Report EWylie
PDF
Poster for SCAG@@
PPTX
Workplace charging best practices (calstart) pasadena workshop 10-25-133
PDF
California State University, Fullerton Unleashes 1.16MW of Solar Power
PDF
Ucla luskin center pev infrastructure
PDF
January 2016: Oregon Clean Fuels Program, Jordan Ramer of EV Connect
PPTX
Why electric cars?
PPTX
Electric cars
DOCX
Tesla strategic management final
PDF
Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
LACity Suitability Report EWylie
Poster for SCAG@@
Workplace charging best practices (calstart) pasadena workshop 10-25-133
California State University, Fullerton Unleashes 1.16MW of Solar Power
Ucla luskin center pev infrastructure
January 2016: Oregon Clean Fuels Program, Jordan Ramer of EV Connect
Why electric cars?
Electric cars
Tesla strategic management final
Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
Ad

Similar to EV Charging Signing Rec Practices (20)

PPTX
Advancing Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
PPTX
Ev presentation for teca marketing group 2012
PDF
RIGHT-OF-WAY CHARGING: How Cities Can Lead the Way by Forth
PDF
Unification Requirements of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
PPTX
Q1 2020 Utility Working Group Presentation
PDF
Handbookfor ev charginginfrastructureimplementation081221
PDF
Handbookfor ev charginginfrastructureimplementation081221
PDF
Pathways to Electric Vehicle Adoption Event
PDF
NickNigro_RCSD2019
PPTX
Charging Fueling & Infrastructure (CFI) Program Resources by Cat Plein
PPTX
Charging in electric vehicles(ev)
PPTX
Electric Vehicles Readiness and Charging at Multi-Unit Dwellings by Eric Huang
PDF
Clean + Modern Grid by Garrett Fitzgerald
PDF
ILP Scotland CPD Webinar: What should Scotland consider when planning electri...
PPTX
02_ev_charging_systems_connectors_and_installations.pptx
PPTX
Using Federal Charging Funds Equitably & Effectively by Steve Lommele and Bri...
PDF
Multiple EV charging stations
PPTX
Washington State EV Charging along Highway Corridors
PDF
A Review on Electric Vehicle Charging Systems
PDF
Innovation needs for the integration of electric vehicles into the energy system
Advancing Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Ev presentation for teca marketing group 2012
RIGHT-OF-WAY CHARGING: How Cities Can Lead the Way by Forth
Unification Requirements of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
Q1 2020 Utility Working Group Presentation
Handbookfor ev charginginfrastructureimplementation081221
Handbookfor ev charginginfrastructureimplementation081221
Pathways to Electric Vehicle Adoption Event
NickNigro_RCSD2019
Charging Fueling & Infrastructure (CFI) Program Resources by Cat Plein
Charging in electric vehicles(ev)
Electric Vehicles Readiness and Charging at Multi-Unit Dwellings by Eric Huang
Clean + Modern Grid by Garrett Fitzgerald
ILP Scotland CPD Webinar: What should Scotland consider when planning electri...
02_ev_charging_systems_connectors_and_installations.pptx
Using Federal Charging Funds Equitably & Effectively by Steve Lommele and Bri...
Multiple EV charging stations
Washington State EV Charging along Highway Corridors
A Review on Electric Vehicle Charging Systems
Innovation needs for the integration of electric vehicles into the energy system

EV Charging Signing Rec Practices

  • 2. On October 24, 2013, the governors of eight states signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) committing to coordinated action to ensure the successful implementation of their state zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) programs. ZEVs include pure battery-electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. Collectively, these states are committed to having at least 3.3 million ZEVs operating on their roadways by 2025. The MOU identifies joint cooperative actions the signatory states will undertake, and additional actions that individual jurisdictions are considering, to build a robust market for ZEVs. The MOU created a multi-state ZEV Program Implementation Task Force and called for the development of the Multi-State ZEV Action Plan. The Task Force, composed of state officials, serves as a forum for coordination and collaboration on the full range of program development, support, and implementation issues to promote effective and efficient implementation of ZEV regulatory initiatives. NESCAUM, a nonprofit association of state environmental agencies, serves as the facilitator and provides technical and policy assistance to the Task Force. The Multi-State ZEV Action Plan provides additional detail and specificity to the commitments in the MOU and is intended to assist in developing consistent and complementary measures within and across our states to foster efficient market development and maximize the ownership experience for consumers. This report was developed by the Task Force’s ZEV Infrastructure Planning Implementation Team. The Task Force would like to thank Ashley Horvat, formerly of the Oregon Department of Transportation, and Sarah McKearnan of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources for their leadership as co-chairs of the Team; Elaine O’Grady as lead NESCAUM staff; representatives on the Team from state transportation agencies, including Barbara Abrahamer of the New York State Department of Transportation, Gina Campoli of VTrans, Steve Cliff of CalTrans, and Rick Hanley of the Connecticut Department of Transportation; and staff from the Federal Highway Administration for their assistance and input, especially Diane Turchetta and Kevin Sylvester.
  • 3. A key action in the Multi-State Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Action Plan is to provide clear and accurate signing to direct ZEV drivers to refueling and charging stations and dedicated parking sites. This document identifies recommended practices for implementing the actions in the Multi-State ZEV Action Plan related to electric vehicle charging signing. Uniform signing will help plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) drivers easily locate charging stations. In general, two basic types of signs are needed for electric vehicle charging stations: directional signs and regulatory signs. Directional signs are used to safely guide PEV drivers to charging stations. These signs can also help to increase general public awareness of PEVs as a transportation option and improve range confidence for PEV drivers. Regulatory signs are used to convey restrictions related to charging and associated parking, such as time or access limits (e.g., no parking unless the vehicle is charging). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is charged with setting national standards for traffic control devices, including all signs, signals, markings, and other devices used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, installed on any street, highway, bikeway, or private road open to public travel. These standards are established by rulemaking and set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD). There have been significant developments in the PEV market since the MUTCD was last revised in 2009. Therefore, as discussed in more detail below, the FHWA has issued two memorandums to establish polices on signing for electric vehicle charging stations.  To direct PEV drivers to electric vehicle charging stations, the current edition of the MUTCD, which was released in 2009, allows transportation agencies to install a general service symbol that consists of a representation of a fuel pump and hose that 1
  • 4. ______________________________________ 1 FHWA, Interim Approval for Optional Use of an Alternative Electric Vehicle Charging General Service Symbol Sign (Apr. 1, 2011), available at: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia13/ 2 See http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ialistreq.htm#ia13 incorporates the legend EV. In response to concerns that this symbol could be confusing to drivers, the FHWA issued an interim approval in April 2011 for the optional use of an alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol that incorporates a representation of an electrical cord (see figure below) rather than a fuel pump and hose.1 The FHWA’s interim approval does not compel use of the alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol but allows transportation agencies to request approval to use this symbol until the MUTCD is revised and may continue to use the alternate symbol thereafter if it is included in the revised MUTCD. The FHWA anticipates that the next revision of the MUTCD will include an option to use the alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol as a standard sign. To complete a rulemaking to revise the MUTCD, it will take the FHWA approximately two years from the time that a Notice of Proposed Amendment is released for public comment. In the meantime, to ensure that signing directing drivers to electric vehicle charging stations is clear and consistent, the recommended practice is to use the alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol. The FHWA will grant interim approval to any state transportation agency that submits a request to the Office of Transportation Operations. A short letter making the request will suffice, and the FHWA typically grants requests for interim approval within a few days. As a condition of interim approval, the FHWA requires jurisdictions that use the alternate sign to keep track of the locations where the signs are installed. As of June 1, 2015, the FHWA has granted interim approval to the following states: California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.2 D9-11b (Alternate) 2
  • 5.  When using signs to direct drivers to charging stations, a recommended practice is to use an all-word “FAST” plaque (see figure below and attachments for design specifications) in conjunction with the alternative electric vehicle charging station general service symbol to indicate when a charging station includes a DC fast charger. Note that any necessary state approvals should be obtained prior to using such a plaque.3 The use of a “FAST” plaque will clearly identify for PEV drivers EV charging stations that include a DC fast charger from those that do not.  The current edition of the MUTCD does not include any standards for signs installed for electric vehicle charging facilities at on-street parking locations or other parking facilities. Such signs are sometimes needed, for example, to convey parking restrictions and facilitate enforcement. To promote uniformity among jurisdictions, the FHWA issued a memorandum in June 20134 that recommends a number of signs and optional plaques that may be used by state and local transportation agencies for this purpose until the FHWA establishes standard signs in the next edition of the MUTCD. The FHWA expects to include such signs in the next revision of the MUTCD, which will take approximately two years from the time a Notice of Proposed Amendment is released for public comment. In the meantime, following the FHWA’s recommendations will ensure that regulatory signs for EV charging stations and parking spaces are uniform and consistent and comply with the requirements of the MUTCD. The figure below is an example of one of the signs recommended by the FHWA. ______________________________________ 3 For example, California approved the use of a “FAST” header plaque in the California Department of Transpor- tation Traffic Operations Policy Directive #13-01, available at: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/ interim_approval/ialistreq.htm#ia13 4 FHWA, Regulatory Signs for Electric Vehicle Charging and Parking Facilities (June 17, 2013), available at: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/policy/rsevcpfmemo/ 3
  • 6. It is important to note that only word legends may be used on signs and plaques for on-street electric vehicle charging and parking sites because, according to the FHWA, no symbol has been developed and tested to ensure that it effectively conveys the regulations associated with electric vehicle charging and associated parking sites. However, to clearly identify a charging site, the alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol may be posted at a charging site along with regulatory signs and plaques. If posted together, the alternative electric vehicle charging general service symbol should be posted above the regulatory sign to make it easier for drivers to see and locate the charging station. The MUTCD and related FHWA policies apply to public parking areas such as on-street parking, rest areas, park and rides, etc. While the MUTCD does not legally apply to parking areas that are separated from public roads, such as parking lots and garages, providing consistency will help all drivers to recognize and understand electric vehicle charging station signs. In addition, some states require that signs installed on private roadways and parking areas conform to the MUTCD to be enforceable, which is a good practice to promote uniform signing. Lastly, to insure that signs comply with State statutes and are enforceable, coordination with the applicable state transportation agency and/or other signing regulatory body is advised. 4
  • 8. 6
  • 9. 7