Making Great Academic Presetations.pdf
0 likes85 views
The document provides guidance on delivering effective scientific presentations, emphasizing the importance of connecting with the audience, simplifying the message, and utilizing media effectively. It discusses the typical structure of scientific presentations and shares examples, including a review of diagnostic test accuracy in acute myocardial infarction and trial designs in clinical research. Additionally, it highlights the significance of creative delivery and data presentation to engage the audience while still conveying key information.
Making Great Academic Presetations.pdf
- 1. SCIENTIFIC PRESENTATIONS M A K I N G G R E A T R I C K B O D Y
- 2. RULES OF A GREAT PRESENTATION VICTORIA BRAZIL Connect with your audience Look and sound great Keep it simple
- 4. TELL A STORY
- 6. Introduction, Objectives, Methods, Results, Conclusions THE STRUCTURE IS OFTEN ALREADY SET SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS Because the subject is ‘dry’ & the format is rigid IT IS OFTEN HARD TO TELL A STORY It can be challenging to be engaging while still presenting data in sufficient detail for critical appraisal IT IS HARD TO PRESENT DATA NICELY
- 7. CONSIDERATIONS AROUND P1: THE MESSAGE Still tell a story Still start with the bottom line Still connect with the audience Still keep it simple
- 8. CONSIDERATIONS AROUND P2: THE MEDIA Colours Theme Fonts
- 9. PRESENTING DATA Identify the key messages Cut out everything unnecessary Be creative to make data accessible & appealing
- 10. EXAMPLES
- 11. What does the NIHR fund? Research infrastructure Research programmes & projects Research training & fellowships
- 12. What is an NIHR Incubator? "Networking structures to support capacity building and multidisciplinary career development in priority areas where critical mass is low" NIHR Strategic Review of Training 2017
- 13. Challenging Cardiovascular Cases Can The Guidelines Solve Them? @richardbody
- 14. When to suspect HOCM ECG changes Short PR interval Heart block Left ventricular hypertrophy Precordial T wave inversion Extreme axis Normal in 6% of cases Symptoms Chest pain, often exertional, after alcohol or after meals Heart failure Unexplained syncope Palpitations
- 15. ESCAPE FROM THE LABORATORY ESCAPE FROM THE LABORATORY FACT OR FICTION? HS-TROPONIN
- 16. WE CAN WE CAN RAPIDLY RAPIDLY RULE OUT MI RULE OUT MI With ONE TEST on arrival... Using cutoffs around the limit of detection With TWO TESTS 1-3 hours apart... Using a validated algorithm WITH LABORATORY HIGH- SENSITIVTY TROPONIN ASSAYS ALSO with ONE test on arrival... Using decision aids like HEART, T-MACS, EDACS
- 18. ESC Guidelines 2020: 0/1h algorithm for ruling in/out myocardial infarction Collet et al, European Heart Journal, 2020
- 19. Very low or low and no 1h delta Other High or 1h delta Rule out Observe Rule in THE0/1HRULEIN/OUTALGORITHM Collet et al, Eur Heart J, 2020
- 20. Very low or low and no 1h delta Other High or 1h delta Rule out Observe Rule in Good evidence base Short interval between serial tests Lab turnaround time too long All patients will get two tests THE0/1HRULEIN/OUTALGORITHM Collet et al, Eur Heart J, 2020
- 21. Collet et al, Eur Heart J, 2020 Very low or low and no 1h delta Other High and/or 1h delta RULE OUT RULE OUT RULE IN RULE IN OBSERVE OBSERVE Stress test OR CTCA OR angiography OR none Discharge OR Admit
- 23. Adults presenting to the ED with symptoms of venous thromboembolism TRIAL DESIGN Aim was to enrol 1,000 patients Assessed with Wells score
- 24. TRIAL DESIGN SCREENING Approach Check eligibility Written informed consent SAMPLING FOLLOW-UP Venous blood sample Capillary samples 90-day follow-up CRF completed Centrifuged within 4 hours Analysed centrally
- 25. Trial Sites Manchester Salford St George’s University College Hospital London Royal London Hospitals Homerton University Hospitals Addenbrookes South Warwickshire Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh St John’s Hospital, Livingston Queen Elizabeth, Glasgow UKE Hamburg
- 26. Trial Sites St John's Hospital, Livingston Royal Infirmary Edinburgh Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (Prof Rick Body, Chief Investigator) Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust Addenbrookes, Cambridge Royal London St George's University College London Hospitals UKE Hamburg
- 28. 1 2 3 Individual RCT N=629, all with normal ECGs Control: Standard care (local pathway) Intervention: Rule out if hs-cTn (various) below limit of detection LoDED TRIAL Primary outcome: Discharge within 4 hours with no MACE at 30 days No significant difference between groups 46% vs 37% discharged Adjusted odds ratio 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). https://heart.bmj.com/content/106/20/1586 Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial MACE, major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction or urgent coronary revascularization)
- 30. VERSUS
- 31. Factors associated with first-pass success: (After propensity score matching) Video vs direct laryngoscopy 19,071 intubations in the National Emergency Airway Registry (US) 88% with at least one difficult airway characteristic Video laryngoscopy OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.6 - 2.9) Impression of difficult airway OR 0.7 (95% CI 0.5 - 0.99) Blood/vomit in airway OR 0.5 (95% CI 0.4 - 0.8) External laryngeal manipulation OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.3 - 0.5) Trent et al, Ann Emerg Med 2021
- 33. F e m a l e H y p e r l i p i d a e m i a H y p e r t e n s i o n D i a b e t e s P r i o r m y o c a r d i a l i n f a r c t i o n F a m i l y h i s t o r y o f h e a r t d i s e a s e C u r r e n t s m o k i n g 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Baselinecharacteristics 817 patients; 121 (14.8%) had type 1 or type 2 AMI Mean age 63.9 years (SD 15.1)
- 34. F e m a l e H y p e r l i p i d a e m i a H y p e r t e n s i o n D i a b e t e s P r i o r m y o c a r d i a l i n f a r c t i o n F a m i l y h i s t o r y o f h e a r t d i s e a s e C u r r e n t s m o k i n g 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Baselinecharacteristics 817 patients; 121 (14.8%) had type 1 or type 2 AMI Mean age 63.9 years (SD 15.1)
- 35. Methods Prospective diagnostic test accuracy study 12 hospitals and four ambulance NHS trusts We included patients with suspected cardiac chest pain presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset We excluded patients with STEMI and those without capacity to provide written informed consent Verbal consent was taken initially, followed by written consent in hospital Blood was drawn from IV cannulae in the ambulance and taken to hospital to be tested for troponin with the Roche cobas h232 point of care testing device within 4 hours Paramedics prospectively collected data for the T-MACS and HEART scores Leftover plasma was centrifuged and frozen at -80 degrees Celsius pending future analysis
- 36. CONSENT Consultation with NARSG* Consultation with a patient group Verbal consent in the ambulance Written consent in the hospital *: NARSG: National Ambulance Research Steering Group
- 37. SAMPLES Paramedics drew blood from IV cannulae Point of care tests were run in hospital (Roche Cobas h232) Remaining plasma frozen for batch testing at a later date
- 38. INDEXTEST Roche Cobas h232 cardiac troponin, with and without T-MACS and the HEART score
- 39. Let’s say we have to summarise the results of four RCTs of DOACs vs warfarin for VTE in one slide
- 40. Edoxaban Dabigatran DOACS for treatment of vte Comparison: Warfarin. Outcome: Efficacy Rivaroxaban Apixaban Non-inferior Non-inferior Non-inferior Non-inferior
- 41. Templates Stock images, icons Pro features www.Canva.com
- 44. You may have to use PowerPoint to present FORMATTING TIPS If so, be sure to check your slides. They may not look the same after inserting from other software To escape formatting errors, download slides as PNG files and insert into blank slides
- 46. RULES OF A GREAT PRESENTATION VICTORIA BRAZIL Connect with your audience Look and sound great Keep it simple