Microservices Architecture & Testing Strategies

Micro Services Architecture
Part 1 : Infrastructure Comparison &
Design Styles (DDD, Event Sourcing / CQRS, Functional Reactive Programming)
Araf Karsh Hamid Co-Founder / CTO, MetaMagic Global Inc., NJ, USA
A Micro Service will have its own Code Pipeline for build and deployment functionalities and it’s scope will be defined
by the Bounded Context focusing on the Business Capabilities and the interoperability between Micro Services will be
achieved using message based communication.

Pioneers in Microservices Implementation
8/10/2018 (C) COPYRIGHT METAMAGIC GLOBAL INC., NEW JERSEY, USA 2
New Entrants

* For IT Services : They can do one more project of same size with ZERO COST in Platform Licensing (Based on 20 developer pack USD $50K per month for 3 months License cost = $150K)
38/10/2018 (C) COPYRIGHT METAMAGIC GLOBAL INC., NEW JERSEY, USA

Agenda
8/10/2018 4
• What are Microservices?
• When Should I use them?
• What is the right size for a Microservice?
• Why is Microservices better than Monoliths?
• 12 Factor Apps Methodology
• Infrastructure Architecture
Overview & Infrastructure Architecture1
• Capability Centric Design
• Domain Driven Design
• Hexagonal Architecture
• Event Sourcing & CQRS
• Functional Reactive Programming
Software Architecture and Design2
• Microservices Scalability
• CAP Theorem
• ACID Vs BASE
• Distributed Transactions
• Eventual Consistency: SAGA Pattern
• Scalability Lessons from EBay
Scalability3
(C) COPYRIGHT METAMAGIC GLOBAL INC., NEW JERSEY, USA
• Microservices Testing Strategy
• Testing Anti Patterns
• Testing Scenarios / Tools
• Chaos Engineering
• Behavior Driven Development
Testing Strategies4
21
25
9
9

What are Microservices?
The microservice architectural style is an approach to developing
• A single application as a suite of small services,
• Each running in its own process and
• Communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API.
• These services are built around business capabilities and
• Independently deployable by fully automated deployment machinery.
• There is a bare minimum of centralized management of these services,
• Which may be written in different programming languages and
• Use different data storage technologies.
- James Lewis and Martin Fowler
1
Source: https://www.martinfowler.com/microservices/

Microservices Characteristics
6
1
By James Lewis and Martin Fowler
We can scale our operation independently, maintain
unparalleled system availability, and introduce new services
quickly without the need for massive reconfiguration. —
Werner Vogels, CTO, Amazon Web Services
Modularity ... is to a technological economy what
the division of labor is to a manufacturing one.
W. Brian Arthur,
author of e Nature of Technology
The key in making great and growable systems is much more
to design how its modules communicate rather than what
their internal properties and behaviors should be.
Alan Kay, 1998 email to the Squeak-dev list
Components
via
Services
Organized around
Business
Capabilities
Products
NOT
Projects
Smart
Endpoints
& Dumb Pipes
Decentralized
Governance &
Data Management
Infrastructure
Automation
Design for
Failure
Evolutionary
Design

What is the right size for a Microservice?
1
• Rather than the size what matters is the Business Function /
Domain of the service.
• One Microservice may have half a dozen entities and other a
couple of dozen entities. What’s more important is the role
Microservices plays.
• Bounded Context from DDD helps you to decompose a large
multi domain Monolith into a Microservice for each Bounded
Context.
• Focusing on User stories will help you clearly define the
boundaries of the Business Domain.

Microservices System Design Model
Service
(Micro)
Process &
Tools
CultureOrganization
Solution
(Macro)
8/10/2018 8
Service: Focuses on a specific Business
Capability
Process & Tools: Development, Code
Deployment, Maintenance and Product
Management
Culture: A Shared set of values, beliefs by
everyone. Ubiquitous Language in DDD is
an important aspect of Culture.
Organization: Structure, Direction of
Authority, Granularity, Composition of
Teams.
Solution: Coordinate all inputs and
outputs of multiple services. Macro level
view of the system allows the designer to
focus more on desirable system behavior.
1
All these concept
of System Design
will be explained
in detailed in
Section 2 Software
Architecture &
Design
Marc Stickdorn, author of This is Service Design Thinking

When should I use them (Microservices)?
1
• Strong Module Boundaries:
Microservices reinforce modular
structure, which is particularly important
for larger teams.
• Independent Deployment: Simple
services are easier to deploy, and since
they are autonomous, are less likely to
cause system failures when they go
wrong.
• Technology Diversity: With microservices
you can mix multiple languages,
development frameworks and data-
storage technologies.
When you have What’s the Cost
Distribution: Distributed systems are harder to
program, since remote calls are slow and are
always at risk of failure.
Eventual Consistency: Maintaining strong
consistency is extremely difficult for a
distributed system, which means everyone has
to manage eventual consistency.
Operational Complexity: You need a mature
operations team to manage lots of services,
which are being redeployed regularly.
Source: https://www.martinfowler.com/microservices/

Why is Microservices better than Monoliths?
1
1. A monolith is built as a Large Single Unit
and usually composed of the following
1. A Database (Typically RDBMS)
2. Backend Code (In Java – war/ear file)
3. Frontend Code (HTML5 / JSP / ASP)
2. Any feature addition requires the entire
unit to be deployed.
3. When we need to scale we need to have
Multiple copies of the entire App.
4. Entire App in Single Technology Stack.
• Small autonomous
services that work
together.
• Loosely coupled with
Bounded Context.
• It’s a natural
consequence of applying
SRP at Architecture level.
• Asynchronous
Microservices
SRP = Single Responsibility Pattern

Microservices Architecture
1
• API Gateway
• Service Discovery
• Config Service
• Event Bus / Streams
• Service Mesh
• Functional Reactive
Programming
Infrastructure Architecture

8/10/201812
Monolithic vs. Micro Services Example
Traditional Monolithic App using
Single Technology Stack
Micro Services with Multiple Technology Stack
This 3 tier
model is
obsolete
now.
Source:
Gartner
Market
Guide for
Application
Platforms
Nov 23, 2016
Event Stream
API Gateway (Zuul Edge Server)
Load Balancer (Ribbon)
Circuit Breaker (Hystrix)
Service Discovery (Eureka)
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
4
EE 7
Inventory
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
1
Customer
SE 8
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
3
ShoppingCart
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
2
Order
1
UI Layer
WS
BL
DL
Database
ShoppingCart
Order
Customer
Inventory

8/10/2018
13
SOA vs. Micro Services Example
Traditional Monolithic App with SOA
Event Stream
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
1
Customer
SE 8
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
3
ShoppingCart
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
2
Order
1
API Gateway
Load Balancer
Circuit Breaker
Service Discovery
Load Balancer
Circuit Breaker
Load Balancer
Circuit Breaker
UI Layer
Database
ShoppingCart
Order
Customer
Inventory
Enterprise Service
Bus
Messaging
REST / SOAP
HTTP
MOM
JMS
ODBC / JDBC
Translation
Web Services
XML
WSDL
Addressing
Security
Registry
Management
Producers
Shared
Database
Consumers3rd Party Apps
Smart Pipes
Lot of Business logic
resides in the Pipe

1
• Authentication and Security: identifying
authentication requirements for each resource.
• Dynamic Routing: dynamically routing requests
to different backend..
• Stress Testing: gradually increasing the traffic.
• Load Shedding: allocating capacity for each
type of request and dropping requests.
• Insights and Monitoring: tracking meaningful
data and statistics.
• Static Response handling: building some
responses directly.
• Multi region Resiliency: routing requests across
AWS regions. Source: https://dzone.com/articles/spring-cloud-netflix-zuul-edge-serverapi-gatewayga
• Hystrix (CB) is used to wrap calls to our
origins, which allows us to shed and
prioritize traffic when issues occur.
• Ribbon (LB) is our client for all
outbound requests from Zuul, which
provides detailed information into
network performance and errors, as
well as handles software load
balancing for even load distribution.
• Turbine aggregates fine-grained
metrics in real-time so that we can
quickly observe and react to problems.
• Archaius handles configuration and
gives the ability to dynamically change
properties.
API Gateway Other Services

1
# Name * Who Uses Pros Cons
1
Media Type Versioning
Accept:
Application/vnd.api.article+xml;
version=1.0
Med GitHub
• Version Directly @ resource
level
• Preserve URI
• Close to RESTful Specs
• Harder to Test
• Distort HTTP Headers
purpose
• Tools required for testing
2
Custom Headers Versioning
X-API-Version: 2.
Med Microsoft • Preservers URI
• Harder to Test
• Tools required for testing
3
URI Versioning
api.example.com/v1/resource
High
Google
Twitter
Amazon
• Most common method
• Versions can be explored
using Browser
• Easy to use
• Disrupts RESTful
Compliance. URI should
represent resource and not
versions
4
Domain Versioning
apiv1.example.com/resource
Low Facebook • Same as are URI Versioning • Same as URI Versioning
5
Request Parameter Versioning
GET /something/?version=0.1
High
Pivotal
NetFlix
• Similar to URI versioning • It can get messy
6
Date Versioning
First request saves the date.
Low Clearbit
• New APIs can be shipped
without changing the end
points
• Complex to implement
• Traceability is difficult.
API Versioning

Service Mesh – Sidecar Design Pattern
10-08-2018 16
CB – Circuit Breaker
LB – Load Balancer
SD – Service Discovery
Microservice
Process1Process2
Service Mesh Control Plane
Service
Discovery
Routing
Rules
Control Plane will have all the rules for Routing and
Service Discovery. Local Service Mesh will download the
rules from the Control pane will have a local copy.
Service Discovery Calls
Service
Mesh
Calls
Customer Microservice
Application Localhost calls
http://localhost/order/processOrder
Router
Network Stack
LBCB SD
ServiceMesh
Sidecar
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Order Microservice
Application Localhost calls
http://localhost/payment/processPayment
Router
Network Stack
LBCB SD
ServiceMesh
Sidecar
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Data Plane
1

Service Mesh – Traffic Control
10-08-2018 17
API Gateway
End User
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Customer
Service Mesh
Control Plane
Admin
Traffic Rules
Traffic Control rules can be
applied for
• different Microservices
versions
• Re Routing the request
to debugging system to
analyze the problem in
real time.
• Smooth migration path
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Order v1.0
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Business Logic
Service Mesh
Sidecar
Order v2.0
Service
Cluster
1

Micro Services Deployment Model
Event Stream
Users
Service
Discovery
(Eureka)
Config
Server
(Spring)
API (Zuul) Gateway
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Micro
Service
2
ShoppingCart
SE 8
LB = Ribbon
CB = Hystrix
LB = Ribbon
CB = Hystrix
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Product
SE 8
Micro Service 1
With 4 node cluster
LB = Ribbon
CB = Hystrix
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Order
SE 8
Micro Service 3
With 2 node
Cluster
LB = Ribbon
CB = Hystrix
UI Layer
Web Services
Business Logic
Database Layer
Customer
Micro Service 4
With 2 node
cluster
HTTP Server
All UI Code is
bundled
Virtual
Private
Network
1

Pros
1. Adds Complexity
2. Skillset shortage
3. Confusion on getting the
right size
4. Team need to manage
end-to-end of the Service
(From UI to Backend to
Running in Production).
8/10/2018 19
1. Robust
2. Scalable
3. Testable (Local)
4. Easy to Change and
Replace
5. Easy to Deploy
6. Technology Agnostic
Cons
Microservices Pros and Cons1

Summary – Micro Services Intro
10-08-2018 20
SOA
Martin Fowler – Micro Services Architecture
https://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html
Dzone – SOA vs Micro Services : https://dzone.com/articles/microservices-vs-soa-2
1
Key Features
1. Small in size
2. Messaging–enabled
3. Bounded by contexts
4. Autonomously developed
5. Independently deployable
6. Decentralized
7. Language–agnostic
8. Built and released with
automated processes
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Micro
Service
Microservice is not SOA.

12 Factor App Methodology
1
4 Backing Services Treat Backing services like DB, Cache as attached resources
5 Build, Release, Run Separate Build and Run Stages
6 Process Execute App as One or more Stateless Process
7 Port Binding Export Services with Specific Port Binding
8 Concurrency Scale out via the process Model
9 Disposability Maximize robustness with fast startup and graceful exit
10 Dev / Prod Parity Keep Development, Staging and Production as similar as possible
11 Logs Treat logs as Event Streams
12 Admin Process Run Admin Tasks as one of Process
Source:https://12factor.net/
Factors Description
1 Codebase One Code base tracked in revision control
2 Dependencies Explicitly declare dependencies
3 Configuration Configuration driven Apps

• Business Solution & Process
• Strategic Design
• Tactical Design
• ES and CQRS
• Event Sourcing Example
• 4 Building Blocks of RxJava
• Observable and Observer Design Pattern
Microservices Architecture & Design2
It’s not necessary that
you need to use all
these patterns. You
will be using these
based on your
technical requirement

Business Solution & Business Process
 Business Solution focuses the entire Journey of the User which
can run across multiple Micro Services.
 Business Solution comprises a set of Business Processes.
 A specific Micro Service functionality will be focused on a
Business Process / Concern
Business Solution: Customer Dining Experience
Order PaymentFood Menu KitchenDining
Browse Menu Order Dinner Dinner Served Get Bill Make Payment
2

Capability Centric Design
8/10/2018 24
Vertically sliced Product Team
Business Centric Development
• Focus on Business Capabilities
• Entire team is aligned towards
Business Capability.
• From Specs to Operations – The
team handles the entire spectrum
of Software development.
• Every vertical will have it’s own
Code Pipeline
Front-End-Team Back-End-Team Database-Team
In a typical Monolithic way the team is
divided based on technology / skill set
rather than business functions. This leads
to not only bottlenecks but also lack of
understanding of the Business Domain.
QA / QC Team
Front-End
Back-End
Database
Business
Capability 1
QA/QCTeam
Front-End
Back-End
Database
Business
Capability 2
QA/QCTeam
Front-End
Back-End
Database
Business
Capability 3
QA/QCTeam
2

Domain Driven Design
• Strategic Design
• Tactical Design

Bounded Context – Strategic Design
2
• Bounded Context is a Specific Business Process / Concern.
• Components / Modules inside the Bounded Context are context specific.
• Multiple Bounded Contexts are linked using Context Mapping.
• One Team assigned to a Bounded Context.
• Each Bounded Context will have it’s own Source Code Repository.
• When the Bounded Context is being developed as a key strategic
initiative of your organization, it’s called the Core Domain.
• Within a Bounded Context the team must have same language called
Ubiquitous language for Spoken and for Design / Code Implementation.

DDD: Bounded Context – Strategic Design
8/10/2018
27
An App User’s Journey can run across
multiple Bounded Context / Micro
Services.
User Journey X
Bounded
Context
Bounded
Context
Bounded
Context
Dinning
Order
Reservation
Tables
Recipes
Raw
Materials
Frozen
Semi Cooked
Appetizer Veg
Appetizer Non
Veg
Soft Drinks
Main Course
Non Veg
Main Course
Veg
Hot Drinks Desserts
Steward
Chef
Menu
uses
uses
Dinning
Order
Reservation
Tables
Recipes
Raw
Materials
Frozen
Semi Cooked
Appetizer Veg
Appetizer Non
Veg
Soft Drinks
Main Course
Non Veg
Main Course
Veg
Hot Drinks Desserts
Steward
Chef
Menu
uses
uses
UnderstandingBoundedContext(DDD)ofaRestaurantApp
Dinning
Context
Kitchen
Context
Menu Context
Source: Domain-Driven Design
Reference by Eric Evans
2
Areas of the domain treated
independently
Discovered as you assess
requirements and build language

10 August 2018 28
Ubiquitous
Language
Vocabulary shared by
all involved parties
Used in all forms of spoken /
written communication
Ubiquitous
Language
Domain
Expert
Analyst Developers
QA
Design
Docs
Test Cases
Code
Restaurant Context – Food Item :
Eg. Food Item (Navrathnakurma)
can have different meaning or
properties depends on the
context.
• In the Menu Context it’s a
Veg Dish.
• In the Kitchen Context it’s
is recipe.
• And in the Dining Context
it will have more info
related to user feed back
etc.
2
DDD: Ubiquitous Language: Strategic Design
As an Restaurant Owner
I want to know who my Customers are
So that I can serve them better
Role-Feature-Reason Matrix
BDD – Behavior Driven Development
Given Customer John Doe exists
When Customer orders food
Then
Assign customer preferences
as Veg or Non Veg customer
BDD Construct

DDD : Context Map – Strategic Design
10August2018
29
Source: Domain-Driven Design Reference by Eric Evans
2
Context Map
defines the
relationship
of Bounded
Contexts

8/10/2018 30
Hexagonal Architecture
Ports & Adapters
The layer between the Adapter and
the Domain is identified as the Ports
layer. The Domain is inside the port,
adapters for external entities are on
the outside of the port.
The notion of a “port” invokes the
OS idea that any device that adheres
to a known protocol can be plugged
into a port. Similarly many adapters
may use the Ports.
Source : http://alistair.cockburn.us/Hexagonal+architecture
https://skillsmatter.com/skillscasts/5744-decoupling-from-asp-net-hexagonal-architectures-in-net
Services
for UI
Ports
File
system Database
Order Tracking
JPA Repository
Implementation
Adapters
OrderProcessing
Domain Service
(Business Rules)
Implementation
Domain
Models
Domain Layer
Order Data
Validation
OrderService
REST Service
Implementation
OrderProcessing
Interface
p
Order Tracking
Repository
Interface
p
A
A
External
Apps
A
A A
Others
A
A
OrderService
Interface
p
Web
Services
Data
Store
Use Case Boundary
Bounded Context
A
• Reduces Technical Debt
• Dependency Injection
• Auto Wiring
2

Shopping Portal Modules – Code Packaging
Auth Products Cart OrderCustomer
Domain Layer
• Models
• Repo
• Services
• Factories
Adapters
• Repo
• Services
• Web Services
Domain Layer
• Models
• Repo
• Services
• Factories
Adapters
• Repo
• Services
• Web Services
Domain Layer
• Models
• Repo
• Services
• Factories
Adapters
• Repo
• Services
• Web Services
Packaging Structure
Bounded Context
Implementation
(Repositories, Business Services, Web Services)
1
Domain Models
(Entities, Value Objects, DTOs)
(Repositories, Business Services, Web Services)
Entity Factories
Interfaces (Ports)

Domain Driven Design – Tactical Design
8/10/2018
32
Source: Domain-Driven Design Reference by Eric Evans
2

DDD: Understanding Aggregate Root
33
Order
Customer
Shipping
Address
Aggregate
Root
Line Item
Line Item
Line Item
*
Payment
Strategy
Credit Card
Cash
Bank Transfer
Source: Martin Fowler : Aggregate Root
• An aggregate will have one of its component
objects be the aggregate root. Any references
from outside the aggregate should only go to the
aggregate root. The root can thus ensure the
integrity of the aggregate as a whole.
• Aggregates are the basic element of transfer of
data storage - you request to load or save whole
aggregates. Transactions should not cross
aggregate boundaries.
• Aggregates are sometimes confused with
collection classes (lists, maps, etc.).
• Aggregates are domain concepts (order, clinic visit,
playlist), while collections are generic. An
aggregate will often contain multiple collections,
together with simple fields.
125
Domain
Driven
Design
2

Shopping Portal
Order ModuleModels
Value Object
• Currency
• Item Value
• Order Status
• Payment Type
• Record State
• Audit Log
Entity
• Order (Aggregate Root)
• Order Item
• Shipping Address
• Payment
DTO
• Order
• Order Item
• Shipping Address
• Payment
Domain Layer Adapters
• Order Repository
• Order Service
• Order Web Service
• Order Query Web Service
• Shipping Address Web Service
• Payment Web Service
Adapters Consists of Actual
Implementation of the Ports like
Database Access, Web Services
API etc.
Converters are used to convert
an Enum value to a proper
Integer value in the Database.
For Example Order Status
Complete is mapped to integer
value 100 in the database.
Services / Ports
• Order Repository
• Order Service
• Order Web Service
Utils
• Order Factory
• Order Status Converter
• Record State Converter
• Order Query Web Service
• Shipping Address Web Service
• Payment Web Service

DDD – Summary
2
More on this in
Event Sourcing
& CQRS Section.
1. Bounded Context
2. Ubiquitous Language
3. Context Map
Strategic
Design
1. Aggregate Root
2. Value Object
3. Domain Events
4. Repository Pattern
5. Factory
Tactical
Design

CRUD / CQRS & Event Sourcing
A brief introduction, more in Part 2 of the Series
Event Storming and SAGA

CRUD and CQRS
8/10/2018 37
Presentation
Services
Business Logic
Data Access
Data Store
UpdatesQueries
Traditional CRUD Architecture
Source: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/maarten_mullender/2004/07/23/crud-only-when-you-can-afford-it-revisite
• A mismatch between the read and write
representations of the data.
• It risks data contention when records are locked in
the data store in a collaborative domain, where
multiple actors operate in parallel on the same set of
data. These risks increase as the complexity and
throughput of the system grows.
• It can make managing security and permissions
more complex because each entity is subject to both
read and write operations, which might expose data
in the wrong context.
CRUD Disadvantages
2

Event Sourcing & CQRS (Command and Query Responsibility Segregation)
• In traditional data management systems, both
commands (updates to the data) and queries
(requests for data) are executed against the same
set of entities in a single data repository.
• CQRS is a pattern that segregates the operations
that read data (Queries) from the operations that
update data (Commands) by using separate
interfaces.
• CQRS should only be used on specific portions of a
system in Bounded Context (in DDD).
• CQRS should be used along with Event Sourcing.
8/10/2018
(C)COPYRIGHTMETAMAGICGLOBALINC.,NEWJERSEY,USA
38
MSDN – Microsoft https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn568103.aspx |
Martin Fowler : CQRS – http://martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html
CQS :
Bertrand Meyer
Axon
Framework
For Java
Java Axon Framework Resource : http://www.axonframework.org
Greg
Young
2

Event Sourcing Intro
8/10/2018 39
Standard CRUD Operations – Customer Profile – Aggregate Root
Profile Created Title Updated New Address added
Derived
Notes Removed
Time T1 T2 T4T3
Event Sourcing and Derived Aggregate Root
Commands
1. Create Profile
2. Update Title
3. Add Address
4. Delete Notes
2
Events
1. Profile Created Event
2. Title Updated Event
3. Address Added Event
4. Notes Deleted Event
3
Current State of the
Customer Profile
4
Event store
Single Source of Truth
Greg
Young
2

Restaurant Dining – Event Sourcing and CQRS
8/10/2018 40
Order Payment
• Add Drinks
• Add Food
• Update Food
Commands • Open Table
• Add Juice
• Add Soda
• Add Appetizer 1
• Add Appetizer 2
• Serve Drinks
• Prepare Food
• Serve Food
Events
• Drinks Added
• Food Added
• Food Updated
• Food Discontinued
• Table Opened
• Juice Added
• Soda Added
• Appetizer 1 Added
• Appetizer 2 Added
• Juice Served
• Soda Served
• Appetizer Served
• Food Prepared
• Food Served
• Prepare Bill
• Process
Payment
• Bill Prepared
• Payment Processed
• Payment Approved
• Payment Declined
• Cash Paid
When people arrive at the Restaurant and take a table, a Table is opened. They may then order drinks and
food. Drinks are served immediately by the table staff, however food must be cooked by a chef. Once the
chef prepared the food it can then be served. Table is closed then the bill is prepared.
Microservices
• Dinning Order
• Billable Order
Customer Journey thru Dinning Processes
Processes
Food Menu KitchenDining
• Remove Soda
• Add Food 1
• Add Food 2
• Place Order
• Close Table
• Remove Soda
• Food 1 Added
• Food 2 Added
• Order Placed
• Table Closed
ES Aggregate
3
2 4
1
The purpose of this example is to demonstrate the concept of ES / CQRS thru Event Storming principles.
2

Use Case : Shopping Portal – Event Sourcing / CQRS
8/10/2018 41
Catalogue Shopping Cart Order Payment
• Search Products
• Add Products
• Update Products
Commands
• Add to Cart
• Remove Item
• Update Quantity
Customer
• Process Order
• Select Address
• Select Delivery Mode
Events
• Product Added
• Product Updated
• Product Discontinued
• Item Added
• Item Removed /
Discontinued
• Item Updated
• Order Initiated
• Address Selected
• Delivery Mode Selected
• Order Created
• Proceed for Payment
• Confirm Order for Payment
• Cancel Order
• Payment Initiated
• Order Cancelled
• Order Confirmed
• OTP Send
• Payment Approved
• Payment Declined
Commands are End-User interaction with the App and based on the commands (Actions) Events are created. These Events includes
both Domain Events and Integration Events. Event Sourced Aggregates will be derived using Domain Events. Each Micro Service will
have its own separate Database. Depends on the scalability requirement each of the Micro Service can be scaled separately. For
Example. Catalogue can be on a 50 node cluster compared to Customer Micro Service.
Microservices
• Customer
• Shop.. Cart
• Order
Customer Journey thru Shopping Process
The purpose of this example is to demonstrate the concept of ES / CQRS thru Event Storming principles.
3
2 ES Aggregate 4
2

Summary – Event Sourcing and CQRS
2
1. Immutable Events
2. Events represents the state change in Aggregate Root
3. Aggregates are Derived from a Collection of Events.
4. Separate Read and Write Models
5. Commands (originated from user or systems) creates
Events.
6. Commands and Queries are always separated and
possibly reads and writes using different data models.

Functional Reactive
Programming

Functional Reactive Programming
8/10/2018 44
ResilientElastic
Message – Driven
1. A responsive, maintainable &
Extensible application is the goal.
2. A responsive application is both
scalable (Elastic) and resilient.
3. Responsiveness is impossible to
achieve without both scalability and
resilience.
4. A Message-Driven architecture is the
foundation of scalable, resilient, and
ultimately responsive systems.
Value
Means
Form
Principles What it means?
Responsive thus React to users demand
Resilient thus React to errors and failures
Elastic thus React to load
Message-Driven thus React to events and messages
Source: http://reactivex.io/
Responsive Maintainable Extensible
2

4 Building Blocks of RxJava
10 August 2018 45
Source of Data Stream [ Sender ]Observable1
Listens for emitted values [ Receiver ]Observer2
2
Source: http://reactivex.io/
Schedulers3
Schedulers are used to manage and control concurrency.
1. observeOn: Thread Observable is executed
2. subscribeOn: Thread subscribe is executed
4 Operators
Content Filtering
Time Filtering
Transformation
Operators that let you
Transform, Combine,
Manipulate, and work
with the sequence of
items emitted by
Observables

Observable / Observer Design Pattern
10 August 2018 46
• Allows for Concurrent Operations: the
observer does not need to block while
waiting for the observable to emit values
• Observer waits to receive values when
the observable is ready to emit them
• Based on push rather than pull
1 & 2Building Block
Source: http://reactivex.io/RxJava/javadoc/index.html?rx/Observable.html
2

What’s missing from GOF Observer Pattern
10 August 2018
47
1
Building Block
Source:http://reactivex.io/intro.html
1. The ability for the producer to signal to the consumer that
there is no more data available (a foreach loop on an
Iterable completes and returns normally in such a case; an
Observable calls its observer’s onComplete method)
2. The ability for the producer to signal to the consumer that
an error has occurred (an Iterable throws an exception if
an error takes place during iteration; an Observable calls
its observer’s onError method)
3. Multiple Thread Implementations and hiding those details.
4. Dozens of Operators to handle data.
2

Compare Iterable Vs. Observable
10 August 2018
48
Observable is the asynchronous / push
dual to the synchronous pull Iterable
• Composable: Easily chained together
or combined
• Flexible: Can be used to emit:
• A scalar value (network result)
• Sequence (items in a list)
• Infinite streams (weather sensor)
• Free from callback hell: Easy to
transform one asynchronous stream
into another
Observables are:
Event
Iterable
(Pull)
Observable
(Push)
Retrieve Data T next() onNext(T)
Discover Error
throws
Exception
onError
(Exception)
Complete !hasNext() onComplete()
1Building Block
Source: http://reactivex.io/RxJava/javadoc/index.html?rx/Observable.html
2

Comparison : Iterable / Streams / Observable
10 August 2018 49
1Building Block
First Class Visitor (Consumer)
Serial Operations
Parallel Streams (10x Speed)
Still On Next, On Complete and
On Error are Serial Operations
Completely Asynchronous
Operations
Java 8 – Blocking CallJava 6 – Blocking Call Rx Java - Freedom
2
Source Code: https://github.com/meta-magic/rxjava

10 August 2018 50
Functional Reactive Programming : Design Patterns
Single
Component Pattern
A Component shall do ONLY one thing,
But do it in FULL.
Single Responsibility Principle By DeMarco : Structured
Analysis & System Specification (Yourdon, New York, 1979)
Let-It-Crash
Pattern
Prefer a FULL component restart to
complex internal failure handling.
Candea & Fox: Crash-Only Software (USENIX HotOS IX, 2003)
Popularized by Netflix Chaos Monkey. Erlang Philosophy
Saga
Pattern
Divide long-lived distributed
transactions into quick local ones with
compensating actions for recovery.
Pet Helland: Life Beyond Distributed Transactions CIDR 2007
2

Summary – Functional Reactive Programming
2
1. A responsive, maintainable & Extensible application is
the goal.
2. A responsive application is both scalable (Elastic) and
resilient.
3. Responsiveness is impossible to achieve without both
scalability and resilience.
4. A Message-Driven architecture is the foundation of
scalable, resilient, and ultimately responsive systems.

• Microservice Scalability
• CAP Theorem
• ACID vs BASE
• Distributed Transactions : 2 Phase Commit
• SAGA Design Pattern
Scalability3

Scale Cube and Micro Services
10-08-2018 53
1. Y Axis Scaling – Functional Decomposition : Business Function as a Service
2. Z Axis Scaling – Database Partitioning : Avoid locks by Database Sharding
3. X Axis Scaling – Cloning of Individual Services for Specific Service Scalability
3
Source: The NewStack. Based on the Art of Scalability by By Martin Abbot & Michael Fisher

CAP Theorem
by Eric Allen Brewer
10August2018
54
Pick Any 2!!
Say NO to 2 Phase Commit 
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Brewer_(scientist)
CAP 12 years later: How the “Rules have changed” : http://www.infoq.com/articles/cap-twelve-years-later-how-the-rules-have-changed
“In a network subject to communication failures, it is impossible for any web service to implement an atomic read / write shared
memory that guarantees a response to every request.”
3

ACID vs BASE
3
Atomic
• All operations in a transaction succeed or every
operation is rolled back.
Consistent
• On the completion of a transaction, the
database is structurally sound.
Isolated
• Transactions do not contend with one another.
Contentious access to data is moderated by the
database so that transactions appear to run
sequentially.
Durable
• The results of applying a transaction are
permanent, even in the presence of failures.
Basic Availability
• The database appears to
work most of the time.
Soft-state
• Stores don’t have to be
write-consistent, nor do
different replicas have to
be mutually consistent all
the time.
Eventual consistency
• Stores exhibit consistency
at some later point (e.g.,
lazily at read time).

Distributed Transactions : 2 Phase Commit
2 PC or not 2 PC, Wherefore Art Thou XA?
10August2018
56
How does 2PC impact scalability?
• Transactions are committed in two phases.
• This involves communicating with every database (XA
Resources) involved to determine if the transaction will commit
in the first phase.
• During the second phase each database is asked to complete
the commit.
• While all of this coordination is going on, locks in all of the data
sources are being held.
• The longer duration locks create the risk of higher contention.
• Additionally, the two phases require more database
processing time than a single phase commit.
• The result is lower overall TPS in the system.
Transaction
Manager
XA Resources
Request to Prepare
Commit
Prepared
Prepare
Phase
Commit
PhaseDone
Source : Pat Helland (Amazon) : Life Beyond Distributed Transactions Distributed Computing : http://dancres.github.io/Pages/
Solution : Resilient System
• Event Based
• Design for failure
• Asynchronous Recovery
• Make all operations idempotent.
• Each DB operation is a 1 PC
3

SAGA Design Pattern instead of 2PC
8/10/2018 57
Long Lived Transactions (LLTs) hold on to DB resources for relatively long periods of time, significantly delaying
the termination of shorter and more common transactions.
Source: SAGAS (1987) Hector Garcia Molina / Kenneth Salem,
Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University, NJ, USA
T1 T2 Tn
Local Transactions
C1 C2 Cn-1
Compensating Transaction
Divide long–lived, distributed transactions into quick local ones with compensating actions for
recovery.
Travel : Flight Ticket & Hotel Booking Example
BASE (Basic Availability, Soft
State, Eventual Consistency)
Room ReservedT1
Room PaymentT2
Seat ReservedT3
Ticket PaymentT4
Cancelled Room Reservation
C1
Cancelled Room Payment
C2
Cancelled Ticket Reservation
C3
3

Scalability Best Practices : Lessons from
Best Practices Highlights
#1 Partition By Function
• Decouple the Unrelated Functionalities.
• Selling functionality is served by one set of applications, bidding by another, search by yet another.
• 16,000 App Servers in 220 different pools
• 1000 logical databases, 400 physical hosts
#2 Split Horizontally
• Break the workload into manageable units.
• eBay’s interactions are stateless by design
• All App Servers are treated equal and none retains any transactional state
• Data Partitioning based on specific requirements
#3
Avoid Distributed
Transactions
• 2 Phase Commit is a pessimistic approach comes with a big COST
• CAP Theorem (Consistency, Availability, Partition Tolerance). Apply any two at any point in time.
• @ eBay No Distributed Transactions of any kind and NO 2 Phase Commit.
#4
Decouple Functions
Asynchronously
• If Component A calls component B synchronously, then they are tightly coupled. For such systems to
scale A you need to scale B also.
• If Asynchronous A can move forward irrespective of the state of B
• SEDA (Staged Event Driven Architecture)
#5
Move Processing to
Asynchronous Flow
• Move as much processing towards Asynchronous side
• Anything that can wait should wait
#6 Virtualize at All Levels • Virtualize everything. eBay created their on O/R layer for abstraction
#7 Cache Appropriately • Cache Slow changing, read-mostly data, meta data, configuration and static data.
10August2018
58
Source: http://www.infoq.com/articles/ebay-scalability-best-practices
3

8/10/2018 59
Design Patterns are
solutions to general
problems that
software developers
faced during software
development.
Design Patterns3

Scalability Summary
8/10/2018 60
1. Scale Cube Scaling in All 3 Axis
1. Functional Decomposition
2. Database Partitioning
3. Cloning Services
2. Eventual Consistency
3. SAGA for Distributed Transaction

• Microservices Testing Strategies
• Testing Anti Patterns
• Chaos Engineering
Microservices Testing Strategies4

Microservices Testing Strategies
Ubiquitous
Language
Domain
Expert
Analyst Developers
QA
Design
Docs
Test Cases
Code
E2E
Testing
Integration
Testing
Contract Testing
Component Testing
Unit Testing
Number of Tests
Speed
Cost
Time
4
Mike Cohen’s Testing Pyramid
Test Pyramid: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TestPyramid.html
70%
20%
10%

Other Testing Strategies or Anti Patterns
Inverted Pyramid /
Ice Cream Cone Strategy
Unit Testing
Integration Testing
End 2 End
Testing
Hour Glass Strategy
70%
20%
10%
45%
45%
10%
4

Microservices Testing Strategy
Unit Testing
A unit test exercises the
smallest piece of testable
software in the application
to determine whether it
behaves as expected.
Source: https://martinfowler.com/articles/microservice-testing/#agenda
Component Testing
A component test limits the
scope of the exercised
software to a portion of the
system under test,
manipulating the system
through internal code
interfaces and using test
doubles to isolate the code
under test from other
components.
Integration Testing
An integration test verifies
the communication paths
and interactions between
components to detect
interface defects
Integration Contract Testing
An Integration Contract test is a
test at the boundary of an
external service verifying that it
meets the contract expected by a
consuming service.
End 2 End Testing
An end-to-end test verifies that a
system meets external
requirements and achieves its
goals, testing the entire system,
from end to end
4
Say NO to End 2 End Tests - Mike
Walker April 22, 2015. Google Test Blog

Testing ToolsMicroservices Testing Scenarios / Tools
65
Contract Testing Scope
Integration Testing
Verifies the communication
paths and interactions
between components to
detect interface defects
Contract Testing
It is a test at the boundary of an
external service verifying that it
meets the contract expected by a
consuming service.
Payment Mock
IntegrationContractTestingScope
Test Double
Montebank
Cart
Component Testing
Unit
Testing
IntegrationTestingScope
Order
REST / HTTP or
Events / Kafka
Item ID,
Quantity,
Address..
Mock Order
Component Testing
A component test limits
the scope of the exercised
software to a portion of
the system under test.
4
Order
Payment
Unit
Testing
Firewall
Integration Testing Scope
REST / HTTP
Payment
Sandbox
Component
Testing

Chaos Engineering – Load / Stress / Performance
4
Chaos Monkey Randomly disables production instances
Chaos Kong
Similar to Chaos Monkey, simulates an outage of an
entire Amazon availability zone.
Doctor Monkey
Checks CPU load, Memory usage and removes it
from network if the health is bad.
Janitor Monkey Search for unused resources and disposes them.
Compliance Monkey
Finds instances that don’t adhere to best-practices
and shuts them down.
Latency Money Induces Artificial delays
Security Monkey
Is an extension of Compliance Monkey. Find security
vulnerabilities and terminates offending instances.
Source: https://github.com/Netflix/SimianArmy/wikiSource: http://principlesofchaos.org/

Behavior Driven Development
4
Source: https://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd/
As an insurance Broker
I want to know who my Gold Customers are
So that I sell more
Given Customer John Doe exists
When
he buys insurance ABC for
$1000 USD
Then He becomes a Gold Customer
BDD Construct
As a Customer
I want to withdraw Cash from ATM
So that I don’t have to wait in line at the bank
Given
The account is in Credit
AND the Card is Valid
AND the dispenser contains Cash
BDD Construct
When The Customer requests Cash
Then
Ensure that the Account is debited
AND Ensure cash is dispensed
AND ensure that Card is returned.

Features of BDD
4
• Focus on Behavior of the System
rather than tests.
• Collaboration between Business
Stake holders, Analysts,
Developers, QA.
• Ubiquitous Language
• Driven By Business Value
• Extends Test Driven Development
Source: https://cucumber.io/
Cucumber merges specification and
test documentation into one cohesive
whole.

Microservices Architecture Summary
• API Gateway
• Service Discovery
• Service Mesh
• Event Streams
Infrastructure Architecture1
Software Architecture and Design2
• Microservices Scalability
• CAP Theorem
• Distributed Transactions
• SAGA Design Pattern
Scalability3
• Microservices Testing Strategy
• Testing Anti-Patterns
Testing Strategies4

8/10/2018 70
Thank you
Araf Karsh Hamid : Co-Founder / CTO
araf.karsh@metamagic.in
USA: +1 (973) 969-2921
India: +91.999.545.8627
Skype / LinkedIn / Twitter / Slideshare : arafkarsh
http://www.slideshare.net/arafkarsh
https://www.linkedin.com/in/arafkarsh/
http://www.slideshare.net/arafkarsh/software-architecture-styles-64537120
http://www.slideshare.net/arafkarsh/function-point-analysis-65711721
http://www.slideshare.net/arafkarsh/functional-reactive-programming-64780160

References
8/10/2018 71
1. Lewis, James, and Martin Fowler. “Microservices: A Definition of This New Architectural Term”, March 25, 2014.
2. Miller, Matt. “Innovate or Die: The Rise of Microservices”. e Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2015.
3. Newman, Sam. Building Microservices. O’Reilly Media, 2015.
4. Alagarasan, Vijay. “Seven Microservices Anti-patterns”, August 24, 2015.
5. Cockcroft, Adrian. “State of the Art in Microservices”, December 4, 2014.
6. Fowler, Martin. “Microservice Prerequisites”, August 28, 2014.
7. Fowler, Martin. “Microservice Tradeoffs”, July 1, 2015.
8. Humble, Jez. “Four Principles of Low-Risk Software Release”, February 16, 2012.
9. Zuul Edge Server, Ketan Gote, May 22, 2017
10. Ribbon, Hysterix using Spring Feign, Ketan Gote, May 22, 2017
11. Eureka Server with Spring Cloud, Ketan Gote, May 22, 2017
12. Apache Kafka, A Distributed Streaming Platform, Ketan Gote, May 20, 2017
13. Functional Reactive Programming, Araf Karsh Hamid, August 7, 2016
14. Enterprise Software Architectures, Araf Karsh Hamid, July 30, 2016
15. Docker and Linux Containers, Araf Karsh Hamid, April 28, 2015
4

References
Domain Driven Design
16. Oct 27, 2012 What I have learned about DDD Since the book. By Eric Evans
17. Mar 19, 2013 Domain Driven Design By Eric Evans
18. May 16, 2015 Microsoft Ignite: Domain Driven Design for the Database Driven Mind
19. Jun 02, 2015 Applied DDD in Java EE 7 and Open Source World
20. Aug 23, 2016 Domain Driven Design the Good Parts By Jimmy Bogard
21. Sep 22, 2016 GOTO 2015 – DDD & REST Domain Driven API’s for the Web. By Oliver Gierke
22. Jan 24, 2017 Spring Developer – Developing Micro Services with Aggregates. By Chris Richardson
23. May 17. 2017 DEVOXX – The Art of Discovering Bounded Contexts. By Nick Tune
Event Sourcing and CQRS
23. Nov 13, 2014 GOTO 2014 – Event Sourcing. By Greg Young
24. Mar 22, 2016 Spring Developer – Building Micro Services with Event Sourcing and CQRS
25. Apr 15, 2016 YOW! Nights – Event Sourcing. By Martin Fowler
26. May 08, 2017 When Micro Services Meet Event Sourcing. By Vinicius Gomes
4

References
8/10/2018 73
27. MSDN – Microsoft https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn568103.aspx
28. Martin Fowler : CQRS – http://martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html
29. Udi Dahan : CQRS – http://www.udidahan.com/2009/12/09/clarified-cqrs/
30. Greg Young : CQRS - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHGkaShoyNs
31. Bertrand Meyer – CQS - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Meyer
32. CQS : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command–query_separation
33. CAP Theorem : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem
34. CAP Theorem : http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem
35. CAP 12 years how the rules have changed
36. EBay Scalability Best Practices : http://www.infoq.com/articles/ebay-scalability-best-practices
37. Pat Helland (Amazon) : Life beyond distributed transactions
38. Stanford University: Rx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9xudo3C1Cw
39. Princeton University: SAGAS (1987) Hector Garcia Molina / Kenneth Salem
40. Rx Observable : https://dzone.com/articles/using-rx-java-observable
4

References – Micro Services – Videos
41. Martin Fowler – Micro Services : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yko4TbC8cI&feature=youtu.be&t=15m53s
42. GOTO 2016 – Microservices at NetFlix Scale: Principles, Tradeoffs & Lessons Learned. By R Meshenberg
43. Mastering Chaos – A NetFlix Guide to Microservices. By Josh Evans
44. GOTO 2015 – Challenges Implementing Micro Services By Fred George
45. GOTO 2016 – From Monolith to Microservices at Zalando. By Rodrigue Scaefer
46. GOTO 2015 – Microservices @ Spotify. By Kevin Goldsmith
47. Modelling Microservices @ Spotify : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XDA044tl8k
48. GOTO 2015 – DDD & Microservices: At last, Some Boundaries By Eric Evans
49. GOTO 2016 – What I wish I had known before Scaling Uber to 1000 Services. By Matt Ranney
50. DDD Europe – Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software By Eric Evans, April 11, 2016
51. AWS re:Invent 2016 – From Monolithic to Microservices: Evolving Architecture Patterns. By Emerson L, Gilt D. Chiles
52. AWS 2017 – An overview of designing Microservices based Applications on AWS. By Peter Dalbhanjan
53. GOTO Jun, 2017 – Effective Microservices in a Data Centric World. By Randy Shoup.
54. GOTO July, 2017 – The Seven (more) Deadly Sins of Microservices. By Daniel Bryant
55. Sept, 2017 – Airbnb, From Monolith to Microservices: How to scale your Architecture. By Melanie Cubula
56. GOTO Sept, 2017 – Rethinking Microservices with Stateful Streams. By Ben Stopford.
57. GOTO 2017 – Microservices without Servers. By Glynn Bird.
8/10/2018 74
4

Simoorg : LinkedIn’s own failure inducer framework. It was designed to be easy to extend
and most of the important components are plug‐ gable.
Pumba : A chaos testing and network emulation tool for Docker.
Chaos Lemur : Self-hostable application to randomly destroy virtual machines in a BOSH-
managed environment, as an aid to resilience testing of high-availability systems.
Chaos Lambda : Randomly terminate AWS ASG instances during business hours.
Blockade : Docker-based utility for testing network failures and partitions in distributed
applications.
Chaos-http-proxy : Introduces failures into HTTP requests via a proxy server.
Monkey-ops : Monkey-Ops is a simple service implemented in Go, which is deployed into an
OpenShift V3.X and generates some chaos within it. Monkey-Ops seeks some OpenShift
components like Pods or DeploymentConfigs and randomly terminates them.
Chaos Dingo : Chaos Dingo currently supports performing operations on Azure VMs and
VMSS deployed to an Azure Resource Manager-based resource group.
Tugbot : Testing in Production (TiP) framework for Docker.
Testing tools

UI
Design
Patterns

UI DesignPatterns
MVC/ MVP/ MVVM
77
View
Controller
Model
Passes
calls To
Fire
Events
Manipulates
• The Controller is responsible to process incoming
requests. It receives input from users via the View,
then process the user's data with the help of Model
and passing the results back to the View.
• Typically, it acts as the coordinator between the
View and the Model.
• The Presenter is responsible for handling all UI events on
behalf of the view. This receive input from users via the
View, then process the user's data with the help of Model
and passing the results back to the View.
• Unlike view and controller, view and presenter are
completely decoupled from each other’s and
communicate to each other’s by an interface. Also,
presenter does not manage the incoming request traffic as
controller.
• Supports two-way data binding between View and
ViewModel.
View
ViewModel
Model
Passes
calls To
Manipulates
Updates
Fire
Events
• The View Model is responsible for exposing methods,
commands, and other properties that helps to maintain
the state of the view, manipulate the model as the
result of actions on the view, and trigger events in the
view itself.
• There is many-to-one relationship between View and
ViewModel means many View can be mapped to one
ViewModel.
• Supports two-way data binding between View and
ViewModel.
View
Presenter
Model
Passes
calls To
Fire
Events
Manipulates
Updates1
1
1
*
Model
View
Controller
Model
View
Presenter
Model
View
ViewModel

UI Design Patterns
Flux / Redux
ViewDispatcher
Every action is sent to all Stores via callbacks the
stores register with the Dispatcher
Store
Action
Action
1 *
Controller-Views
• Listens to Store changes
• Emit Actions to Dispatcher
Dispatcher
• Single Dispatcher per Application
• Manages the Data Flow View to Model
• Receives Actions and dispatch them to Stores
Stores
• Contains state for a Domain (Vs. Specific Component)
• In Charge of modifying the Data
• Inform the views when the Data is changed by emitting the
Changed Event.
Flux Core Concepts
1. One way Data Flow
2. No Event Chaining
3. Entire App State is resolved in store before Views Update
4. Data Manipulation ONLY happen in one place (Store).
Actions
• Simple JS Objects
• Contains Name of the Action and Data (Payload)
• Action represent something that has happened.
• Has No Business Logic

UI Design Patterns Redux
Actions
• Simple JS Objects
• Contains Name of the
Action and Data
(Payload)
• Has NO Business Logic
• Action represent
something that has
happened.
Store
• Multiple View layers can Subscribe
• View layer to Dispatch actions
• Single Store for the Entire Application
• Data manipulation logic moves out of
store to Reducers
Reducer
• Pure JS Functions
• No External calls
• Can combine multiple reducers
• A function that specifies how the state changes in response to an Action.
• Reducer does NOT modify the state. It returns the NEW State.
Redux Core Concepts
1. One way Data Flow
2. No Dispatcher compared to Flux
3. Immutable Store
Available for React & Angular
View
Action
State
Dispatcher
Reducer
R R
R
Store
Middleware
Middleware
Middleware
• Handles External calls
• Multiple Middleware's can be chained.

Microservices Architecture & Testing Strategies

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Microservices Architecture & Testing Strategies (20)

More from Araf Karsh Hamid (16)

Recently uploaded (20)

Microservices Architecture & Testing Strategies

Editor's Notes