Open Data in the cultural sector: Cultural heritage data in Europeana
7 likes1,274 views
This document discusses Europeana's strategic plan to make cultural heritage data more open and accessible through 2025. Key points include: - Europeana aggregates over 20 million digital objects from cultural institutions across Europe and provides metadata and previews. - Current data exchange agreements place restrictive conditions on how the data can be used, such as non-commercial use only. - A consultation found that the benefits of open sharing outweigh the risks, so Europeana will remove restrictions on commercial use and publish data under a CC0 license. - Guidelines for metadata reuse will address issues like attribution and data quality during a transition period from 2011 to mid-2012. - More content could be made available with improved rights clearance mechanisms
Open Data in the cultural sector: Cultural heritage data in Europeana
- 1. Open Data in the cultural sector: Cultural heritage data in Europeana Paul Keller 20 october 2011, Bruxelles
- 2. Single point of access to Europe’s digital heritage
- 3. Europeana Strategic Plan 2011 - 2015
- 4. Leading by example: Setting standards for open cultural heritage data
- 5. Cultural heritage data in Europeana Europeana aggregates metadata and previews relating to more than 20M digital objects This collection of data is used to provide access to the digital objects that are made available online by cultural and scientific heritage institutions all over Europe In order to achieve the our strategic objectives we need to be able to publish the data through a variety of channels (website, APIs, as Linked open Data) Rights now the conditions under which the data provided to Europeana can be used are relatively restrictive (similar to a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike license)
- 6. We cannot publish Europeana data as LOD-thus, we are not able to make full use of the semantic potential of the web
- 7. Our API can’t be used on partners’ sites that include some commercial activity
- 8. We can’t allow the use of our API by commercial companies - ones that could generate income for our partners
- 9. We can’t share our data with Wikipedia as all information posted there needs to be available also for commercial re-use
- 12. Conclusion of the consultation: Benefits of open sharing and open distribution outweigh the risks of open sharing and open distribution Europeana will remove all restrictions (including the one on commercial use) from the next version of its data exchange agreement so that data can be published under CC0 Europeana will publish guidelines for metadata reuse that address issues of attribution and data quality. Transition period from the current situation to the full implementation of the new approach between September 2011 and June 2012
- 13. New Europeana Data Exchange Agreement
- 14. Metadata related to the digitised objects produced by the cultural institutions should be widely and freely available for re-use. (Key reccomendation, p.5)
- 15. What next? Open content from cultural heritage institutions
- 16. Open content in Europeana The majority of content in Europeana is constituted by material in the Public Domain. This material should be labeled accordingly to encourage re-use. With regards to Public Domain material we need to improve compliance with the Europeana Public Domain Charter With regards to material where the copyright is owned by the contributing cultural heritage institutions we will start to promote the use of Creative Commons licenses We need to improve rights clearance mechanisms so that more content can come online (e.g Extended Collective Licensing)
- 17. Cultural information in the light of the review of the PSI directive
- 18. Cultural heritage Data as PSI? Metadata produced by publicly funded cultural heritage institutions should be considered to be Public Sector Information and should be included in the scope of an improved PSI directive. With content the picture is more difficult. Content that is free from rights (Public Domain) or where the rights are owned by publicly funded institutions should also be included All other content does not qualify as public sector information (even if it is held by publicly funded cultural heritage institutions).
- 19. Thank you Paul Keller [email protected]