Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012

www.kdz.or.at

Internal Data Monitoring for
Open Government

3. May 2012
CeDEM 2010, Krems
Bernhard Krabina

Introduction

KDZ – Centre for
Public Administration
Research
NGO, founded 1969
Competence centre for
 Public Management/Public Governance
 Public Finance and
 City Management
Research, consulting and
training
Know-how transfer from
research to practice

www.kdz.or.at
2

Open Gover nment
Implementation Model
(Lee/Kwak 2011)

http://www.kdz.eu/de/open-gover nment-vor gehensmodell
www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 3

4 phases of the model

 phase 1 – Incr easing Data Tr anspar ency
 increasing transparency of government processes and performance by
publishing relevant data online and sharing it with the public.
 phase 2 – Impr oving Open Par ticipation
 improving open participation of the public in government work and
decision making through various methods and tools.
 phase 3 – Enhancing Open Collabor ation
 public engagement in complex tasks or projects that aim to produce
specific outputs and co-create value-added services.
 phase 4 – Realizing Ubiquitous Engagement
 take transparency, participation, and collaboration to the next level of
public engagement.

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 4

Phase 1: Open Gover nment
Data
two most impor tant tasks :
Identifying high-value, high-impact data for the public
Impr oving and assuring data quality in ter ms of
accur acy, consistency, and timeliness

80/20 r ule: top 20% of data that would most benefit the
public:
qW hat have we alr eady published? (think about for mats,
licenses, por tal,…)
qW hat have other s (national/inter national) alr eady
published?
qW hat does the community want? (sur veys, meetings)
qW hat else can we publish ? -> Data monotoring
www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 5

Phase 1: inter nal
data monitoring

 Questions
 What data do we have?
 What data can be published?
 On what criteria do we base
our decision?
 Metrics
 starting point:
services catalogue
 10 criteria incl. description and
& metrics
 assessment in scores
0 – 5 (0 = K.O.)

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 6

Criteria 1/3
Criterion Description Metrics (0-5) points

non- Is the data subject to 0: non-disclosure obligation
non-disclosure 1: restrictions exist, are hardly changeable (e. g. EU restrictions)
disclosure/legal obligations or other 2: restrictions exist, changeable (e. g. regional or district council
restrictions legal restrictions? with extraordinary resolution)
3: restrictions exist, easily changeable (e. g. regional or district
council with simple majority)
4: restrictions exist, very easily changeable (e. g. internal rules
and practices)
5: no restrictions

personal Does the data include 0: personal referenced data
personal references 1: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval hardly
references or can individuals be obtainable
identified? 2: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval obtainable
3: approval obtained (e. g. subsidies)
4: data can be made anonymous
5: no identification of individuals possible

company Does the data include 0: company referenced data
company references 1: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval hardly
references or can individual obtainable
companies be 2: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval obtainable
identified? 3: approval obtained (e. g. subsidies)
4: data can be made anonymous
5: no identification of individual companies possible

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 7

Criteria 2/3

copyright Is the agency sole 0: copyrights of third parties prohibit disclosure
possessor of copyright? 1: subject to license fees and approval
2: subject to license fees, approval obtained
3: no license fees, subject to approval
4: no license fees, no approval needed
5: sole possession of copyright ensured
value How high is the 0: no value
estimated value of 1: very low value
disclosure (for the 2: low value
public, for companies, 3: medium value
for other agencies…) 4: high value
5: very high value
cost How high is the cost of 0: unjustifiable cost
disclosure? 1: very high cost
2: high cost
3: medium cost
4: low cost
5: very low cost
content- How high is the data 0: data quality unjustifiable
quality? (timeliness, 1: data quality very low
related data completeness, 2: data quality low
quality accurateness, 3: data quality medium
faultiness) 4: data quality high
5: data quality very high

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 8

Criteria 3/3

technical 0: data available on paper only
vailable data 1: data available electronically
availability formats, open 2: data available in machine readable format
standards, 5-Stars- 3: data available in OGD formats
Model, OGD 4: data available with URI / as RDF
formats 5: data available as linked data

synergy 0: not yet published
s the data /are 1: published on the agency’s website
services being 2: published/to be published on external portals (e. g. Geoland.at,
made available for Centropemap etc.)
other purposes? 3: published/to be published under regional/national laws (e. g. WGeoDIG)
4: published/to be published due to EU regulations (e. g. INSPIRE, SEIS,
Directive 2003/4/EG…)
5: published/to be published for external customers due to contracts (e.
g. economic chamber …)

compliance 00: OGD principles cannot be met (less than 5 principles)
an the OGD 1: OGD principles partly be met (5 - 7 principles)
with OGD principles be met? 2: OGD principles largely met (minimum of 8 principles), exemption not
principles granted
3: OGD principles cannot be met (less than 5 principles), exemption
granted
4: all OGD principles can be met by exemption to principle 1
5: all OGD principles can be met

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 9

Technical availability

 5-star model of
Ber ner s-Lee

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 10

OGD principles

1. Completeness
2. Primacy
3. Timeliness
4. Ease of Physical and Electronic Access
5. Machine readability
6. Non-discrimination
7. Use of Commonly Owned Standards
8. Licensing
9. Documentation (instead of Permanence)
10. Privacy (instead of Usage Costs)
http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/ten-open-data-principles/
www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 11

Changes of principles

Per manence Dokumentation
 … should be  … ar e documented
available online in compr ehensivel y by
ar chives in medatata and
per petuity. available online over
 …should r emain a long time period.
online, with Once disclosed data
appr opriate ver sion- is published with
tr acking and appr opriate ver sion-
ar chiving over time. tr acking and
ar chiving over time.

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 12

Changes of principles

Usa ge costs Privacy
Not needed in Austria, as Per sonall y identifiable
the Cr eative Commons infor mation will not be
Attribution- disclosed.
NonCommer cial- If ther e might be a
Shar eAlike 3.0 Austria possibility to dr aw
License was chosen conclusions to a per sonal
explicitl y excluding usa ge level, the OGD
costs. competence center is to
be infor med to decide on
w heter or not to disclose
the data.

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 13

Planning of disclosur e…

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 14

Setting up an OGD
competence centr e

 V ir tual or ganisation as inter nal steering
committee and exter nal contact point
 Actions like
 initiate pilot pr ojects
 car r y out contests, giving out awar ds
 ask stakeholder s
 or ganise events (e.g. barcamp)
 set up gover nance str uctur es for data disclosur e
 mana ge cultural change (e. g. ideas competition)
 channell use of social media
 define metrics to measure success
 watch over adherence to OGD principles
 initiate community of practice: „Cooper ation OGD
Austria“
www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 15

Set up of an OGD por tal

 Naming convention: data.NAME.gv.at
 CKAN Austria: of fener.datenkatalog.at
 Austrian data por tal data.gv.at
 Harmonise meta data
 Single point of contact to the EU data portal
 EU data por tal 2012/2013…

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 16

Outlook

Open Gover nment is mor than Open Data!
Transparency?
 Austria is last!
 http://rti-rating.org

Par ticipation?
 E-Participation?
 Participartory Budgeting?
Collaboration?
 Realizing
Ubiquitous Engagement?
 Co-Commission, Co-Design, Co-Deliver, Co-Assess…

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 17

Tr anspar ency thr ough thir d
par ties…
…civil society is lining up
 Respekt.net
 Meineabgeor dneten.at
 vienna.mybikelane.com
 verwaltungsr efor m-jetzt.at
 refor menohnetabu.at
 ubahnaufzug.at
 diemutbuer ger.at
 mehr-demokratie.at
 demokratiebe gehr en.at
 willwaehlen.at
 mehrheitswahl.at
 aktion21.at
 k2020.at
 plattfor m25.at
 …
www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 18

Open Gover nment in V ienna…

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 19

W hat is left to do?

 Open Gover nment Implementation Model
 Work out other phases, including:
 remove banning of social media platforms
 social media guidelines and trainings
 participatory projects
 …
 Fur ther topics to be considered
 Open Source / Open Commons
 Knowledge Management and Social Media? (Knowledge
Management 2.0)
 New structures for working/leading/organising/governing?
 …

www.kdz.or.at
2. Mai 2012 · Seite 20

Contact

 KDZ – Centre for
Public Administration
Research
 Bernhard Krabina
 krabina@kdz.or.at
 www.kdz.eu/de/open-government-vorgehensm
 www.twitter.com/krabina
 www.xing.com/profile/Bernhard_Krabina
 http://at.linkedin.com/in/krabina
www.kdz.or.at
Seite 21

Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (17)

Similar to Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012 (20)

More from Bernhard Krabina (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012