Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia
IJPBCS
Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve
Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland
areas of North Western Ethiopia
*Deresse Hunde1, Gezahegn Tefera2
1,2Pawe Agricultural Research Center, National soybean Research Program, Pawe, Ethiopia
Participatory varietal selection was carried out at North Western parts of Ethiopia, Metekel Zone
at Mandura and Mambuk woreda during the main cropping season in 2017/18, to select the best
performing, stable, adaptable Soybean varieties in the target areas, to enhance accessibility of
improved varieties for producers and to get farmers’ indigenous knowledge used in varietal
selection for future soybean research. The result of the current study clearly showed a significant
difference between the released 12 Soybean varieties for most agronomic traits obtained at both
districts. Seed yield, disease resistance and Number of pods per plant were the dominant
selection criteria used by the farmers at both districts. Accordingly, majority of farmers frequently
selected Pawe-01 variety. In addition, farmers gave priority for Seed yield at both districts and
secondly, they gave equal emphasis to Number of pods per plant, disease resistance and number
of branch per plant at Mandura and plant height, seed per pod and disease resistance at Mambuk.
General, development of high seed yielding with many pods per plant for Mandura and high
yielding with medium plant height in line with disease resistance and medium maturing for
Mambuk district can enhance farmers’ preference towards improved Soybean varieties.
Key words: Participatory Varietal selection, Farmers, Soybean, North Western Ethiopia, agronomic characters
INTRODUCTION
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] is a papilionoid legume
crop that belongs to the family of leguminosae that has a
fairly wide range of adaptation for climatic conditions
(Seltene et al., 2016). The plant is classed as an oil seed
and pulse, fat free (defatted) soybean mail is a primary
low-cost source of protein for animal feed and most
prepackaged meals, soy-vegetable oil is another valuable
product of the processing soybean can produce at least
twice as much protein per acre than many other major
vegetable or grain crops (Mahasi, J., et al, 2010). 5-10
times more protein per acre than land set aside for grazing
animals to make milk and up to 15 times more protein per
acre than land set aside for meat product. Soybean is
mainly used for cooking oil, fodder and soil fertility
regulation (dual-purpose crop) in the study area (DeBoef
and Thijssen, 2006). Soybean is an internationally known
important pulse crop it is used for different purposes (Dixit
Ajay et al, 2011). In the 2015 /2016 cropping season this
crop covers about 38,166.04 hectares of land with an
estimated production not less than 812, 418.33 quintals
(Central Statistical Agency, 2015). Since the oil content is
high 23% and above) it is used for edible oil production.
The by product is cheap and an important source of protein
for both human consumption and animal feed. It can also
be used as soy meat and soy milk (Dixit Ajay et al, 2011).
In Ethiopia FAFA food processing plc company has
imported and used soybean prepare balanced food for
infants and adults. Recently the factory is trying to improve
the food values of other food types by mixing with soybean
flour, which indicates the importance of soybean and its
increment on the market (Ministry of Agriculture, 2013).
*Corresponding Author: Deresse Hunde, Pawe
Agricultural Research Center, National soybean Research
Program, Pawe, Ethiopia. Tel: +251912349587; Email:
deressehunde20@gmail.com; Co-Author Email:
2gtefera2014@gmail.com, Tel: +251913830166
International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science
Vol. 5(2), pp. 403-407, September, 2018. © www.premierpublishers.org. ISSN: 2167-0449
Research Article
Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia
Hunde and Tefera 404
More than twenty-seven improved soybean varieties have
been released at national and regional levels in Ethiopia;
out of this many of them are from Pawe research center
(Ministry of Agriculture, 2013). But only a few of these
varieties have been cultivated by farmers for a long period
of time in the soybean growing areas of North western
Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional State, Metekel
Zone, Mandura and Mambuk woreda. This is mainly due
to lack of availability of seed of these improved varieties
and low level of involvement of farmers during the varietal
selection processes (Seltene et al., 2016). As a result of
knowing genetic variability in line with traits related with
high grain yield were helpful for researchers to develop
high grain yielding soybean through selection and crossing
technique in the country (Seltene et al., 2016). In addition,
the information generated in this study is helpful to identify
best high yielding soybean genotypes for the area that will
be helpful for small scale holder farmers to produce these
crops in the future which will support in food security and
income generation (Seltene et al., 2016). Hence, the
present study was aimed at using participatory varietal
selection to determine selection criteria used by farmers in
North Western Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional
state at Mandura and Mambuk woreda and consequently
to select best performing variety among released Soybean
genotypes and to enhance accessibility of improved
soybean varieties to producers and to learn about farmers
indigenous knowledge for the varietal selection that used
in future soybean research program (Mukalama, J., 2010).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of the study area
The study was carried out in two areas of North Western
Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional States, Metekel
Zone Mandura and Mambuk woreda during the main
cropping season of 2017/2018. Mandura is located 40 km
away from pawe and about 525 km North West Addis
Ababa (Paw Agricultural Research Agro-metrology, 2018).
It is located at 9 13' 09'' N latitude and 4200 19’ 25'' E
longitudes and an altitude of 1100 meters above sea level.
The soil is a well-drained sandy loam and receives a total
rainfall ranging from 460-1600 mm, averaging 671 mm per
annum, with mean annual maximum and minimum
temperatures of 28.1 °C and 15.5 °C, respectively (Pawe
Agricultural Research Center Agro-metrology). The area is
characterized by unimodal rainy seasons; the main rainy
season is "Meher" which extends from July to October.
Experimental Materials and Design
The experiment consisted of twelve released soybean
varieties and one standard check (Table1). Farmers who
participated in varietal selection trials were selected in
collaboration with the Development Agent of the two
districts based on their experience in soybean production.
Accordingly, fifty-one farmers were invited to the stations
to evaluate the varieties that were nearly ready to harvest.
Twenty-three of the participants were women, whereas the
remaining twenty-seven of them are man. The experiment
was designed as a Randomized Complete Block Design
(RCBD) with 3 replications. The individual plot size was 4
rows wide, 60 cm between rows, 0.5 cm between plants
and 1.5m between blocks
Table 1: Varieties used in the study
Number Name of release variety Year of Release
1 korme (AGS-129-2) 2011
2 Katta (PR-145-2) 2011
3 Clarc-63k 1981/82
4 Pawe-01 2014
5 Pawe-02 2014
6 Pawe-03 2014
7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 2010
8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 2010
9 Jalele (AGS-217) 2003
10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-
EP-7-2)
2008
11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 2007
12 Local check (Belessa-95
(Pr-145))
2003
Source: Ethiopian Minstry of Agriculture and Pawe
Agricultural Research Center
Data collected and Analysis
Agronomic data were collected on plant height (cm), days
to maturity, hundred seed weight (gm), grain yield (kg/ha),
number of branch per plant, number of seed per pod and
number of pods per plant. The data generated was
subjected to the analysis of variance (Gomez and Gomez,
1984) using SAS Software version 9.3 and the means
were separated using LSD (Least Significant Difference)
at 5 % level of significance.
Farmers’ preference data were analyzed using pair wise
matrix preference ranking method. Pair wise Comparison
Matrix (Table 2) is a good way of weighing up the relative
importance of different courses of action. It is useful where
there are conflicting demands on resources or competing
in importance (Osiru et al, 2010). It is a tool that provides
a framework for comparing each course of action against
all others, and helps to show the difference in importance
between factors. In other words, it is used to compare each
option with each other option, one-by-one (Mukalama, J.,
2010). For each comparison, we decided which of the two
options was more important, and then assigned a score to
show how much more important it was (Majid et al, 2010).
Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia
Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 405
Table 2: Pair wise matrix comparison for farmers’ selection criteria at Mandura District
Parameters Medium in
maturing
Disease
resistance
Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Height
Medium in
Maturity
Medium maturing Medium maturingMedium maturing Medium maturingMedium maturing
Disease
resistance
Seed yield Seed yield Disease resistantDisease
resistance
Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield
Seed/pod Seed yield Seed/ pod
Pod/plant Pod/plant
Height
Pod/plant 1(4) disease resistant 2(3) seed yield 6(1) seed/pod 1(3) Maturity 5(2) height 0 (5)
NB: Values in the parenthesis indicates the selection criteria obtained by farmers preferences
Table 3: List of improved Soybean varieties ranked by farmers at Mandura and Mambuk in 2017/18 cropping season
Plot No Variety Rank
Mandura Mambuk
1 korme (AGS-129-2) 12 7
2 Katta (PR-145-2) 6 10
3 Clarc-63k 11 8
4 Pawe-01 1 1
5 Pawe-02 2 3
6 Pawe-03 3 2
7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 9 11
8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 7 12
9 Jalele(AGS-217) 8 9
10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 5 4
11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 10 6
12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 4 5
Table 4: Pair wise matrix comparison for farmers’ selection criteria at Mambuk District
Parameters Drought
resistance
Rust
resistance
Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Height
Drought resistance Rust
resistant
Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant drought
Rust resistance Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Rust resistant
Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield
Seed/pod Seed yield Seed/ pod
Pod/plant Pod/plant
Height
Pod/plant 2(5) disease resistant 2(2) seed yield 6(3) seed/pod 3(4) drought 1(1) height 0 (5)
NB: Values in the parenthesis indicates the selection criteria obtained by farmers preferences
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Farmers Preference Analysis
Participatory evaluation was done at vegetative and
physiological maturity stage of soybean varieties with the
total number of 28 male and 23 female farmers selected
based on their soybean farming background information
obtained from DA (Development Agent) for each districts.
Prior to the evaluation, discussion was made with the
farmers on the plant characters and selection procedure;
and then two distinct groups comprising male and female
were formed. They were agreed with plant height, no of
pods per plant, number of seed/pod, branch/plant, and
seed yield and disease resistance as selection criteria.
Most of the farmers preferred Pawe-1 from late maturing
soybean varieties. Based on the result obtained from pair
wise matrix (Table2), farmers at Mandura district gave
priority to seed yield during soybean varietal selection.
Secondly, they focused on seed/pod and pod/plant.
Accordingly, Variety Pawe-1 has been preferred by the
farmers at both district and occupies the first rank (Table
3). Therefore, the result indicated that if seed of the
selected variety is available, then farmers will be
interesting to produce and benefited from it. In the present
study, farmers in Mambuk District (Table4), indicated that
seed yield was one of the most important traits during
soybean varietal selection; next they gave equal
Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia
Hunde and Tefera 406
preference to seed per pod and disease resistant varieties,
this is in agreement with the previous works reported by
Mahasi et al. (2010). Therefore, development of high
yielding soybean varieties which can resist rust disease
and show good performance in yield will enhance farmers’
preference to improve soybean varieties at Mambuk and
Mandura district, this result is in agreement with Seltene et
al., 2016, finding in soybean
Agronomic Evaluation
Analysis of variance revealed a significant (p<0.05)
difference for plant height, seed yield, seed/pod, pod/plant
and rust resistance in soybean. In this regard, both highest
seed yield with highest canopy coverage in terms of
branch and many leaves were recorded by Pawe-1 variety.
This result also is in agreement with the farmers’
preference (Table5) in pair wise matrix comparison. The
analysis of variance result in Mandura showed that, there
is a significant (p<0.05) difference for all parameters
considered and the highest variety is pawe-1 followed by
Pawe-2 and pawe-3 in Mandura and pawe-1, pawe-3 and
pawe-2 in Mambuk Districts(Table3).Pawe-1 showed
consistent and good performance across the two Districts.
Therefore, the variety needs to be multiplied and
distributed in the testing areas for large scale production.
Table 5: ANOVA for seven characters measured for 12 varieties including local check at Mandura District during 2017/18 cropping
season
Plot No Variety Dm Ph Brch Pod Seed Hsw Gyld
1 korme (AGS-129-2) 103a 82.66bac 4.33cbd 68.3ba 2c 11c 847.2h
2 Katta (PR-145-2) 95.33bcd 66ed 4.53cb 68.7a 2c 12ba 1598.3ced
3 Clarc-63k 103a 83.66bac 4.1ed 63.6dec 2c 11c 1042.5hg
4 Pawe-01 97.66 bc 58.8e 5a 63.3de 2.1a 12.5a 2938.2a
5 Pawe-02 97bc 60.4e 4.53cb 66.9bac 2.1a 12.5a 2022.9b
6 Pawe-03 100ba 85.8ba 4.6b 66.9bac 2.1a 12.53a 1946.8cb
7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 96d 78.43bc 4.133ed 66.3bdac 2c 11.6bc 1434.2fe
8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 94.66bcd 62.53e 4.56cb 65bdc 2.03bc 11.66bc 1501.9e
9 Jalele(AGS-217) 95.33bcd 58.8e 4.6b 63.3de 2c 11.33bc 1443.9fe
10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 99.33c 90.66a 4.46cbd 60.6e 2.03bc 12ba 1606.4ced
11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 98.333bc 59.33e 4.2ced 65bdc 2c 11.66bc 1407.4efg
12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 97bc 77.13bc 4.3cbd 66.5bdac 2.06ba 12.5a 1889.1cbd
CV (%) 2.8349 6.5095 10.471 0.57 3.55 1.46 6.9635
LSD 3.72 4.02 8.78 5.18 3.28 1.26 3.86
Grand mean 45.66 97.125 71.50 4.33 64.94 2.027 108.14
Means followed by same letter within a column are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level
Where: Ph= Plant height (cm), Dm=Days to maturity, Hws = hundred seed weight (gm), Gyld = Grain yield (kg/ha),
Brch=number of branch per plant, Seed= number of seed per pod and Pod= number of pods per plant, CV= Coefficient of
Variation, LSD=Least Significant Difference.
Table 6: ANOVA for seven characters measured for 12 varieties including local check at Mambuk District during 2017/18
cropping season
Plot No Variety Dm Ph Brch Pod Seed Hsw Gyld
1 korme (AGS-129-2) 103.67a 49.52dc 4.2fg 63.067ba 1.9c 12.26d 2277.5fe
2 Katta (PR-145-2) 96.67d 77.167a 4.57fde 42.27gef 2a 12de 1869.2hg
3 Clarc-63k 102.67ba 67.8bac 4.7bdec 46.97def 2a 12.83bc 2076.7fg
4 Pawe-01 95.67d 69.03cba 5.167a 52.467dc 2a 11.5fe 3369.3a
6 Pawe-03 98.67dc 61.7bdac 4.7bdec 36.67g 2a 13.5a 2995bc
5 Pawe-02 102.67ba 566bdc 4.33feg 51.93dc 2a 13.3ba 3365a
7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 99bdc 74.1ba 4.53feg 61.967ba 2a 11.83de 1616hi
8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 104a 72.67ba 5.1ba 60.33b 1.9c 11f 1436.2i
9 Jalele(AGS-217) 97.67dc 70.03ba 4.97bdac 43.43gef 1.9c 13.5a 2025.8fg
10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 99bdc 54.33bcd 5.2a 47.23de 1.93bc 12de 2775.3dc
11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 102.67ba 47.57d 4.13g 40.33gf 1.96ba 12.83bc 2505.6de
12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 101.33bc 65.5bdac 5bac 56.83bc 2a 12.33dc 2579.3d
CV (%) 2.17 18.63 5.36 7.92 1.20 2.52 6.64
LSD 3.66 20.16 0.4256 6.897 0.039 0.5236 276.8
Grand Mean 100.20 64.189 4.707 51.64 1.96 12.32 2472.68
Means followed by same letter within a column are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level
Where: Ph= Plant height (cm), Dm=Days to maturity, Hws = hundred seed weight (gm), Gyld = Grain yield (kg/ha),
Brch=number of branch per plant, Seed= number of seed per pod and Pod= number of pods per plant, CV= Coefficient of
Variation, LSD=Least Significant Difference.
Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia
Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 407
The analysis of variance revealed that there was a
significant difference among the varieties and the average
yield for pawe1 (3369.3 kg/ha) followed by Pawe -2
(3365kg/ha), pawe-3 (2995kg/ha) and the local check
Belessa-95 (2579.3kg/ha) at Mambuk woreda, (Table6). In
this case the farmers’ preferences coincide with the
breeders’ selection. The evaluations mean score for each
variety ranged from 1476.2 kg/ha to 3369.3 kg/ha. The
highest score was recorded by pawe-1 and pawe-2,
whereas the lost was recorded by Gizo (TGX-1885-33F
(1476.2 kg/ha) at Mambuk (Table6). Whereas the
evaluation mean score of soybean variety tested at
Mandura woreda, the highest score was recorded by
pawe-1(2938.2kg/ha) followed by pawe-2 (2022.9 kg/ha)
and the local check balassa-95 (1898.1kg/ha)(Table5), at
Mandura woreda. All the three varieties which were
selected by farmers are relatively recent released varieties
when they are compared with the other varieties within
their late maturity groups, but the farmers are being
cultivated for the older varieties (Belesa-95 and Ethio-
Yugoslavia) in the two selected woreda.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
In this study the pair wise matrix analysis explained that
farmers in Mandura District gave priority to pod/plant
during Soybean varietal selection. Secondly, they gave
preference to seed yield and Disease resistance
respectively. Farmers in Mambuk District mainly were
focused on seed yield and subsequently, they gave equal
emphasis to seed/pod and Disease resistant varieties.
These imply that to enhance farmer’s preference towards
Soybean improvement program, the current breeding
program needs to give attention to the aforementioned
traits in the two districts. Both the agronomic and farmers
preference data analysis revealed that Pawe-1 has been
selected on both districts. As a result, this variety needs to
be multiplied and disseminated to producers and farmers
that are playing a great role in soybean seed system
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are grateful to the project AGRA-Soybean
seed system for providing funding during the research
period. Special thanks also go to Pawe Agricultural
Research Center, Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural
Research (EIAR) for convincing the AGRA-seed system to
consider soybean commodity. Special thanks also go with
all participating farmers, agricultural experts and
Development Agents (DA) of Mandura and Mambuk
District for their cooperation and honesty in making
farmers to participate actively on varietal selection from
beginning up to the end of selection and evaluation
processes.
REFERENCES
Central Statistical Agency (CSA) 2015.Agricultural sample
survey 2014/15. Report on area production of crops
(private peasant holdings, Meher Season).The FDRE
statistical bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
De Boef and Thijssen (2006). Participatory tools working
with crops, varieties and seeds guide for Professionals
applying participatory approaches in the agro
biodiversity management, crop Improvement and seed
sector development wageningen, wageningen
international 83p.
Dixit Ajay K, JIX Antony, Navin K, Sharma, Rakesh K
Tiwari, 2011. Soybean constituents and their Functional
benefits.University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
0809, USA.
Gomez and Gomez, 1984 Statistical procedures for
agricultural research. 2ed. John Willey and Sons, New
York
Osiru, D.S.O.1, Balyejusa-Kizito, E.2, Bisikwa, J.1,
Baguma, Y.3 & Turyagyenda, L.1, 2010. Participatory
Selection and development of drought tolerant cassava
varieties for farmersin marginal areas. Research
Application Summary. Second RUFORUM Biennial
Meeting 20 - 24 September 2010, Entebbe, Uganda.
Mahasi, J. M, Vanlauwe, B. Mursoy, R.C. Mbehero, P,
Mukalama, J., 2010. Increasing Productivity of
Soybean in Western Kenya through Evaluation and
Farmer Participatory Variety Selection.
Majid M, Rosnah M, Mohammad R. (2010). Determining
and ranking essential criteria of Construction Project
Selection in Telecommunication of North KhorasanIran.
International Journal of Environmental Science and
Development, Vol. 1, No. 1 ISSN:2010-0264
Ministry of Agriculture (2013). Animal and Plant Health
Regulatory Directorate. Crop Variety Register ISSUE
NO. 15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Mukalama, J., 2010. Increasing Productivity of Soybean
in Western Kenya through Evaluation and Farmer
Participatory Variety Selection.
Seltene Abady, Addisu Getahun, Mulgeta Atnaf and Zinaw
Dilnesaw, (2016): Participatory soybean (Glycine Max
(L.) Merrill) Variety Selection under Rain Fed Condition
of Pawe District, North-Western Ethiopia. International
Journal of Applied Science and Mathematics Volume 3,
Issue 1, ISSN (Online): 2394-2894
Accepted 9 September 2018
Citation: Hunde D, Tefera G (2018). Participatory Varietal
Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max
(L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western
Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop
Science 5(2): 403-407.
Copyright: © 2018 Hunde and Tefera. This is an open-
access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and source are cited.

More Related Content

PDF
Fertiliser calculation
PPTX
Onion seed production
PPTX
commercial horticulture
PPTX
Soil fertility evaluation and fertilizer recommendation
PPTX
Maize ppt
PPTX
General principles of seed production
PPTX
Production technology of Cabbage
PPT
Seed treatment
Fertiliser calculation
Onion seed production
commercial horticulture
Soil fertility evaluation and fertilizer recommendation
Maize ppt
General principles of seed production
Production technology of Cabbage
Seed treatment

What's hot (20)

PPTX
PDF
Seed rate calculation1
PPTX
ORGANIC NUTRIENT SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STRATEGIES
PDF
Determination of total potassium from plant material
PPTX
seed production of oil seeds
PPSX
Seed production technology of wheat
PPTX
Breeding of potato
PPTX
Seed productin technology of okra or ladys finger
PPTX
Floral Biology, Selfing & Crossing techniques and Seed Production on Mustard
PPTX
Nitrogen Use Efficiency
PDF
Agronomy Practical on Estimation of Seed requirement and plant population of ...
PPTX
Onion seed production
PDF
transplanting of Vegetable seedlings
PPTX
DRIS METHOD OF SOIL
DOCX
Propagation and Dissemination of weeds
PPTX
principles of seed production
PPT
CANOPY MANAGEMENT IN FRUIT CROPS.ppt
PDF
Fertliser use efficiency
PDF
L12-Soil-Test-Crop-Response-PPT.pdf
PPTX
Organic farming and water use efficiency
Seed rate calculation1
ORGANIC NUTRIENT SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STRATEGIES
Determination of total potassium from plant material
seed production of oil seeds
Seed production technology of wheat
Breeding of potato
Seed productin technology of okra or ladys finger
Floral Biology, Selfing & Crossing techniques and Seed Production on Mustard
Nitrogen Use Efficiency
Agronomy Practical on Estimation of Seed requirement and plant population of ...
Onion seed production
transplanting of Vegetable seedlings
DRIS METHOD OF SOIL
Propagation and Dissemination of weeds
principles of seed production
CANOPY MANAGEMENT IN FRUIT CROPS.ppt
Fertliser use efficiency
L12-Soil-Test-Crop-Response-PPT.pdf
Organic farming and water use efficiency
Ad

Similar to Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia (20)

PDF
Correlation and Path analysis studies among yield and yield related traits in...
PDF
2 agdew bekele final_paper--10
PDF
Evaluation of Soya Bean Varieties at Moisture Stress of Eastern Harerghe Zone...
PDF
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
PDF
Genetic divergence among soybean (glycine max (l) merrill)
PDF
Participatory variety selection of Faba Bean for yield components and yield a...
PDF
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
PDF
Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Kabuli Chickpea (Cic...
PDF
Estimate of Genetic Variability Parameters among Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea ...
PDF
Evaluation of chick pea (cicerarietinum l.) varieties for yield performance a...
PDF
Varietal differences in seed germination and seedling vigour characteristics ...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Soybean Technologies in Fedis D...
PPTX
Soybeannnnn
PDF
Glyphosate resistance trait into soybean Cuban varieties: agronomical assessm...
PDF
Farmers perception on production constraints, trait preference and variety se...
PDF
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
PDF
Genetic Progress for Yield, Yield Components and Other Agronomic Characters o...
PDF
Studying yield and yield components of Early Maturing Maize (Zea mays L.) Inb...
PDF
Eleventh bulletin of the quarterly publication of Tropical Legumes III (TL II...
PDF
Dr. Carlo Fadda, Director, Bioversity Inc., Rom, Aug 7, 2020
Correlation and Path analysis studies among yield and yield related traits in...
2 agdew bekele final_paper--10
Evaluation of Soya Bean Varieties at Moisture Stress of Eastern Harerghe Zone...
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
Genetic divergence among soybean (glycine max (l) merrill)
Participatory variety selection of Faba Bean for yield components and yield a...
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Kabuli Chickpea (Cic...
Estimate of Genetic Variability Parameters among Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea ...
Evaluation of chick pea (cicerarietinum l.) varieties for yield performance a...
Varietal differences in seed germination and seedling vigour characteristics ...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Soybean Technologies in Fedis D...
Soybeannnnn
Glyphosate resistance trait into soybean Cuban varieties: agronomical assessm...
Farmers perception on production constraints, trait preference and variety se...
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
Genetic Progress for Yield, Yield Components and Other Agronomic Characters o...
Studying yield and yield components of Early Maturing Maize (Zea mays L.) Inb...
Eleventh bulletin of the quarterly publication of Tropical Legumes III (TL II...
Dr. Carlo Fadda, Director, Bioversity Inc., Rom, Aug 7, 2020
Ad

More from Premier Publishers (20)

PDF
Evaluation of Agro-morphological Performances of Hybrid Varieties of Chili Pe...
PDF
An Empirical Approach for the Variation in Capital Market Price Changes
PDF
Influence of Nitrogen and Spacing on Growth and Yield of Chia (Salvia hispani...
PDF
Enhancing Social Capital During the Pandemic: A Case of the Rural Women in Bu...
PDF
Impact of Provision of Litigation Supports through Forensic Investigations on...
PDF
Improving the Efficiency of Ratio Estimators by Calibration Weightings
PDF
Urban Liveability in the Context of Sustainable Development: A Perspective fr...
PDF
Transcript Level of Genes Involved in “Rebaudioside A” Biosynthesis Pathway u...
PDF
Multivariate Analysis of Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) Clones on Mor...
PDF
Causes, Consequences and Remedies of Juvenile Delinquency in the Context of S...
PDF
The Knowledge of and Attitude to and Beliefs about Causes and Treatments of M...
PDF
Effect of Phosphorus and Zinc on the Growth, Nodulation and Yield of Soybean ...
PDF
Influence of Harvest Stage on Yield and Yield Components of Orange Fleshed Sw...
PDF
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
PDF
Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.) to Deficit Irrigation in Bennatse...
PDF
Harnessing the Power of Agricultural Waste: A Study of Sabo Market, Ikorodu, ...
PDF
Influence of Conferences and Job Rotation on Job Productivity of Library Staf...
PDF
Scanning Electron Microscopic Structure and Composition of Urinary Calculi of...
PDF
Gentrification and its Effects on Minority Communities – A Comparative Case S...
PDF
Oil and Fatty Acid Composition Analysis of Ethiopian Mustard (Brasicacarinata...
Evaluation of Agro-morphological Performances of Hybrid Varieties of Chili Pe...
An Empirical Approach for the Variation in Capital Market Price Changes
Influence of Nitrogen and Spacing on Growth and Yield of Chia (Salvia hispani...
Enhancing Social Capital During the Pandemic: A Case of the Rural Women in Bu...
Impact of Provision of Litigation Supports through Forensic Investigations on...
Improving the Efficiency of Ratio Estimators by Calibration Weightings
Urban Liveability in the Context of Sustainable Development: A Perspective fr...
Transcript Level of Genes Involved in “Rebaudioside A” Biosynthesis Pathway u...
Multivariate Analysis of Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) Clones on Mor...
Causes, Consequences and Remedies of Juvenile Delinquency in the Context of S...
The Knowledge of and Attitude to and Beliefs about Causes and Treatments of M...
Effect of Phosphorus and Zinc on the Growth, Nodulation and Yield of Soybean ...
Influence of Harvest Stage on Yield and Yield Components of Orange Fleshed Sw...
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.) to Deficit Irrigation in Bennatse...
Harnessing the Power of Agricultural Waste: A Study of Sabo Market, Ikorodu, ...
Influence of Conferences and Job Rotation on Job Productivity of Library Staf...
Scanning Electron Microscopic Structure and Composition of Urinary Calculi of...
Gentrification and its Effects on Minority Communities – A Comparative Case S...
Oil and Fatty Acid Composition Analysis of Ethiopian Mustard (Brasicacarinata...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
ACFE CERTIFICATION TRAINING ON LAW.pptx
PDF
Solved Past paper of Pediatric Health Nursing PHN BS Nursing 5th Semester
PDF
Farming Based Livelihood Systems English Notes
PDF
The TKT Course. Modules 1, 2, 3.for self study
PDF
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
PDF
M.Tech in Aerospace Engineering | BIT Mesra
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
PDF
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
PDF
Health aspects of bilberry: A review on its general benefits
PPTX
PLASMA AND ITS CONSTITUENTS 123.pptx
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PDF
Mucosal Drug Delivery system_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
PDF
Myanmar Dental Journal, The Journal of the Myanmar Dental Association (2013).pdf
PDF
African Communication Research: A review
PDF
Disorder of Endocrine system (1).pdfyyhyyyy
PDF
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
PDF
Horaris_Grups_25-26_Definitiu_15_07_25.pdf
PDF
PUBH1000 - Module 6: Global Health Tute Slides
PPTX
Reproductive system-Human anatomy and physiology
ACFE CERTIFICATION TRAINING ON LAW.pptx
Solved Past paper of Pediatric Health Nursing PHN BS Nursing 5th Semester
Farming Based Livelihood Systems English Notes
The TKT Course. Modules 1, 2, 3.for self study
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
M.Tech in Aerospace Engineering | BIT Mesra
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
Health aspects of bilberry: A review on its general benefits
PLASMA AND ITS CONSTITUENTS 123.pptx
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
Mucosal Drug Delivery system_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
Myanmar Dental Journal, The Journal of the Myanmar Dental Association (2013).pdf
African Communication Research: A review
Disorder of Endocrine system (1).pdfyyhyyyy
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Horaris_Grups_25-26_Definitiu_15_07_25.pdf
PUBH1000 - Module 6: Global Health Tute Slides
Reproductive system-Human anatomy and physiology

Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia

  • 1. Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia IJPBCS Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia *Deresse Hunde1, Gezahegn Tefera2 1,2Pawe Agricultural Research Center, National soybean Research Program, Pawe, Ethiopia Participatory varietal selection was carried out at North Western parts of Ethiopia, Metekel Zone at Mandura and Mambuk woreda during the main cropping season in 2017/18, to select the best performing, stable, adaptable Soybean varieties in the target areas, to enhance accessibility of improved varieties for producers and to get farmers’ indigenous knowledge used in varietal selection for future soybean research. The result of the current study clearly showed a significant difference between the released 12 Soybean varieties for most agronomic traits obtained at both districts. Seed yield, disease resistance and Number of pods per plant were the dominant selection criteria used by the farmers at both districts. Accordingly, majority of farmers frequently selected Pawe-01 variety. In addition, farmers gave priority for Seed yield at both districts and secondly, they gave equal emphasis to Number of pods per plant, disease resistance and number of branch per plant at Mandura and plant height, seed per pod and disease resistance at Mambuk. General, development of high seed yielding with many pods per plant for Mandura and high yielding with medium plant height in line with disease resistance and medium maturing for Mambuk district can enhance farmers’ preference towards improved Soybean varieties. Key words: Participatory Varietal selection, Farmers, Soybean, North Western Ethiopia, agronomic characters INTRODUCTION Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] is a papilionoid legume crop that belongs to the family of leguminosae that has a fairly wide range of adaptation for climatic conditions (Seltene et al., 2016). The plant is classed as an oil seed and pulse, fat free (defatted) soybean mail is a primary low-cost source of protein for animal feed and most prepackaged meals, soy-vegetable oil is another valuable product of the processing soybean can produce at least twice as much protein per acre than many other major vegetable or grain crops (Mahasi, J., et al, 2010). 5-10 times more protein per acre than land set aside for grazing animals to make milk and up to 15 times more protein per acre than land set aside for meat product. Soybean is mainly used for cooking oil, fodder and soil fertility regulation (dual-purpose crop) in the study area (DeBoef and Thijssen, 2006). Soybean is an internationally known important pulse crop it is used for different purposes (Dixit Ajay et al, 2011). In the 2015 /2016 cropping season this crop covers about 38,166.04 hectares of land with an estimated production not less than 812, 418.33 quintals (Central Statistical Agency, 2015). Since the oil content is high 23% and above) it is used for edible oil production. The by product is cheap and an important source of protein for both human consumption and animal feed. It can also be used as soy meat and soy milk (Dixit Ajay et al, 2011). In Ethiopia FAFA food processing plc company has imported and used soybean prepare balanced food for infants and adults. Recently the factory is trying to improve the food values of other food types by mixing with soybean flour, which indicates the importance of soybean and its increment on the market (Ministry of Agriculture, 2013). *Corresponding Author: Deresse Hunde, Pawe Agricultural Research Center, National soybean Research Program, Pawe, Ethiopia. Tel: +251912349587; Email: [email protected]; Co-Author Email: [email protected], Tel: +251913830166 International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science Vol. 5(2), pp. 403-407, September, 2018. © www.premierpublishers.org. ISSN: 2167-0449 Research Article
  • 2. Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia Hunde and Tefera 404 More than twenty-seven improved soybean varieties have been released at national and regional levels in Ethiopia; out of this many of them are from Pawe research center (Ministry of Agriculture, 2013). But only a few of these varieties have been cultivated by farmers for a long period of time in the soybean growing areas of North western Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional State, Metekel Zone, Mandura and Mambuk woreda. This is mainly due to lack of availability of seed of these improved varieties and low level of involvement of farmers during the varietal selection processes (Seltene et al., 2016). As a result of knowing genetic variability in line with traits related with high grain yield were helpful for researchers to develop high grain yielding soybean through selection and crossing technique in the country (Seltene et al., 2016). In addition, the information generated in this study is helpful to identify best high yielding soybean genotypes for the area that will be helpful for small scale holder farmers to produce these crops in the future which will support in food security and income generation (Seltene et al., 2016). Hence, the present study was aimed at using participatory varietal selection to determine selection criteria used by farmers in North Western Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional state at Mandura and Mambuk woreda and consequently to select best performing variety among released Soybean genotypes and to enhance accessibility of improved soybean varieties to producers and to learn about farmers indigenous knowledge for the varietal selection that used in future soybean research program (Mukalama, J., 2010). MATERIALS AND METHODS Description of the study area The study was carried out in two areas of North Western Ethiopia, Benishangule Gumuze Regional States, Metekel Zone Mandura and Mambuk woreda during the main cropping season of 2017/2018. Mandura is located 40 km away from pawe and about 525 km North West Addis Ababa (Paw Agricultural Research Agro-metrology, 2018). It is located at 9 13' 09'' N latitude and 4200 19’ 25'' E longitudes and an altitude of 1100 meters above sea level. The soil is a well-drained sandy loam and receives a total rainfall ranging from 460-1600 mm, averaging 671 mm per annum, with mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures of 28.1 °C and 15.5 °C, respectively (Pawe Agricultural Research Center Agro-metrology). The area is characterized by unimodal rainy seasons; the main rainy season is "Meher" which extends from July to October. Experimental Materials and Design The experiment consisted of twelve released soybean varieties and one standard check (Table1). Farmers who participated in varietal selection trials were selected in collaboration with the Development Agent of the two districts based on their experience in soybean production. Accordingly, fifty-one farmers were invited to the stations to evaluate the varieties that were nearly ready to harvest. Twenty-three of the participants were women, whereas the remaining twenty-seven of them are man. The experiment was designed as a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications. The individual plot size was 4 rows wide, 60 cm between rows, 0.5 cm between plants and 1.5m between blocks Table 1: Varieties used in the study Number Name of release variety Year of Release 1 korme (AGS-129-2) 2011 2 Katta (PR-145-2) 2011 3 Clarc-63k 1981/82 4 Pawe-01 2014 5 Pawe-02 2014 6 Pawe-03 2014 7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 2010 8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 2010 9 Jalele (AGS-217) 2003 10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81- EP-7-2) 2008 11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 2007 12 Local check (Belessa-95 (Pr-145)) 2003 Source: Ethiopian Minstry of Agriculture and Pawe Agricultural Research Center Data collected and Analysis Agronomic data were collected on plant height (cm), days to maturity, hundred seed weight (gm), grain yield (kg/ha), number of branch per plant, number of seed per pod and number of pods per plant. The data generated was subjected to the analysis of variance (Gomez and Gomez, 1984) using SAS Software version 9.3 and the means were separated using LSD (Least Significant Difference) at 5 % level of significance. Farmers’ preference data were analyzed using pair wise matrix preference ranking method. Pair wise Comparison Matrix (Table 2) is a good way of weighing up the relative importance of different courses of action. It is useful where there are conflicting demands on resources or competing in importance (Osiru et al, 2010). It is a tool that provides a framework for comparing each course of action against all others, and helps to show the difference in importance between factors. In other words, it is used to compare each option with each other option, one-by-one (Mukalama, J., 2010). For each comparison, we decided which of the two options was more important, and then assigned a score to show how much more important it was (Majid et al, 2010).
  • 3. Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 405 Table 2: Pair wise matrix comparison for farmers’ selection criteria at Mandura District Parameters Medium in maturing Disease resistance Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Height Medium in Maturity Medium maturing Medium maturingMedium maturing Medium maturingMedium maturing Disease resistance Seed yield Seed yield Disease resistantDisease resistance Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed/pod Seed yield Seed/ pod Pod/plant Pod/plant Height Pod/plant 1(4) disease resistant 2(3) seed yield 6(1) seed/pod 1(3) Maturity 5(2) height 0 (5) NB: Values in the parenthesis indicates the selection criteria obtained by farmers preferences Table 3: List of improved Soybean varieties ranked by farmers at Mandura and Mambuk in 2017/18 cropping season Plot No Variety Rank Mandura Mambuk 1 korme (AGS-129-2) 12 7 2 Katta (PR-145-2) 6 10 3 Clarc-63k 11 8 4 Pawe-01 1 1 5 Pawe-02 2 3 6 Pawe-03 3 2 7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 9 11 8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 7 12 9 Jalele(AGS-217) 8 9 10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 5 4 11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 10 6 12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 4 5 Table 4: Pair wise matrix comparison for farmers’ selection criteria at Mambuk District Parameters Drought resistance Rust resistance Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Height Drought resistance Rust resistant Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant drought Rust resistance Seed yield Seed/pod Pod/plant Rust resistant Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed yield Seed/pod Seed yield Seed/ pod Pod/plant Pod/plant Height Pod/plant 2(5) disease resistant 2(2) seed yield 6(3) seed/pod 3(4) drought 1(1) height 0 (5) NB: Values in the parenthesis indicates the selection criteria obtained by farmers preferences RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Farmers Preference Analysis Participatory evaluation was done at vegetative and physiological maturity stage of soybean varieties with the total number of 28 male and 23 female farmers selected based on their soybean farming background information obtained from DA (Development Agent) for each districts. Prior to the evaluation, discussion was made with the farmers on the plant characters and selection procedure; and then two distinct groups comprising male and female were formed. They were agreed with plant height, no of pods per plant, number of seed/pod, branch/plant, and seed yield and disease resistance as selection criteria. Most of the farmers preferred Pawe-1 from late maturing soybean varieties. Based on the result obtained from pair wise matrix (Table2), farmers at Mandura district gave priority to seed yield during soybean varietal selection. Secondly, they focused on seed/pod and pod/plant. Accordingly, Variety Pawe-1 has been preferred by the farmers at both district and occupies the first rank (Table 3). Therefore, the result indicated that if seed of the selected variety is available, then farmers will be interesting to produce and benefited from it. In the present study, farmers in Mambuk District (Table4), indicated that seed yield was one of the most important traits during soybean varietal selection; next they gave equal
  • 4. Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia Hunde and Tefera 406 preference to seed per pod and disease resistant varieties, this is in agreement with the previous works reported by Mahasi et al. (2010). Therefore, development of high yielding soybean varieties which can resist rust disease and show good performance in yield will enhance farmers’ preference to improve soybean varieties at Mambuk and Mandura district, this result is in agreement with Seltene et al., 2016, finding in soybean Agronomic Evaluation Analysis of variance revealed a significant (p<0.05) difference for plant height, seed yield, seed/pod, pod/plant and rust resistance in soybean. In this regard, both highest seed yield with highest canopy coverage in terms of branch and many leaves were recorded by Pawe-1 variety. This result also is in agreement with the farmers’ preference (Table5) in pair wise matrix comparison. The analysis of variance result in Mandura showed that, there is a significant (p<0.05) difference for all parameters considered and the highest variety is pawe-1 followed by Pawe-2 and pawe-3 in Mandura and pawe-1, pawe-3 and pawe-2 in Mambuk Districts(Table3).Pawe-1 showed consistent and good performance across the two Districts. Therefore, the variety needs to be multiplied and distributed in the testing areas for large scale production. Table 5: ANOVA for seven characters measured for 12 varieties including local check at Mandura District during 2017/18 cropping season Plot No Variety Dm Ph Brch Pod Seed Hsw Gyld 1 korme (AGS-129-2) 103a 82.66bac 4.33cbd 68.3ba 2c 11c 847.2h 2 Katta (PR-145-2) 95.33bcd 66ed 4.53cb 68.7a 2c 12ba 1598.3ced 3 Clarc-63k 103a 83.66bac 4.1ed 63.6dec 2c 11c 1042.5hg 4 Pawe-01 97.66 bc 58.8e 5a 63.3de 2.1a 12.5a 2938.2a 5 Pawe-02 97bc 60.4e 4.53cb 66.9bac 2.1a 12.5a 2022.9b 6 Pawe-03 100ba 85.8ba 4.6b 66.9bac 2.1a 12.53a 1946.8cb 7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 96d 78.43bc 4.133ed 66.3bdac 2c 11.6bc 1434.2fe 8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 94.66bcd 62.53e 4.56cb 65bdc 2.03bc 11.66bc 1501.9e 9 Jalele(AGS-217) 95.33bcd 58.8e 4.6b 63.3de 2c 11.33bc 1443.9fe 10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 99.33c 90.66a 4.46cbd 60.6e 2.03bc 12ba 1606.4ced 11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 98.333bc 59.33e 4.2ced 65bdc 2c 11.66bc 1407.4efg 12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 97bc 77.13bc 4.3cbd 66.5bdac 2.06ba 12.5a 1889.1cbd CV (%) 2.8349 6.5095 10.471 0.57 3.55 1.46 6.9635 LSD 3.72 4.02 8.78 5.18 3.28 1.26 3.86 Grand mean 45.66 97.125 71.50 4.33 64.94 2.027 108.14 Means followed by same letter within a column are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level Where: Ph= Plant height (cm), Dm=Days to maturity, Hws = hundred seed weight (gm), Gyld = Grain yield (kg/ha), Brch=number of branch per plant, Seed= number of seed per pod and Pod= number of pods per plant, CV= Coefficient of Variation, LSD=Least Significant Difference. Table 6: ANOVA for seven characters measured for 12 varieties including local check at Mambuk District during 2017/18 cropping season Plot No Variety Dm Ph Brch Pod Seed Hsw Gyld 1 korme (AGS-129-2) 103.67a 49.52dc 4.2fg 63.067ba 1.9c 12.26d 2277.5fe 2 Katta (PR-145-2) 96.67d 77.167a 4.57fde 42.27gef 2a 12de 1869.2hg 3 Clarc-63k 102.67ba 67.8bac 4.7bdec 46.97def 2a 12.83bc 2076.7fg 4 Pawe-01 95.67d 69.03cba 5.167a 52.467dc 2a 11.5fe 3369.3a 6 Pawe-03 98.67dc 61.7bdac 4.7bdec 36.67g 2a 13.5a 2995bc 5 Pawe-02 102.67ba 566bdc 4.33feg 51.93dc 2a 13.3ba 3365a 7 Gishama(PR-143-(26)) 99bdc 74.1ba 4.53feg 61.967ba 2a 11.83de 1616hi 8 Gizo(TGX-1885-33F) 104a 72.67ba 5.1ba 60.33b 1.9c 11f 1436.2i 9 Jalele(AGS-217) 97.67dc 70.03ba 4.97bdac 43.43gef 1.9c 13.5a 2025.8fg 10 Dhidhessa (PR-149-81-EP-7-2) 99bdc 54.33bcd 5.2a 47.23de 1.93bc 12de 2775.3dc 11 ETHIO-YOGOZLAVIA 102.67ba 47.57d 4.13g 40.33gf 1.96ba 12.83bc 2505.6de 12 Local check(Belessa-95(Pr-145)) 101.33bc 65.5bdac 5bac 56.83bc 2a 12.33dc 2579.3d CV (%) 2.17 18.63 5.36 7.92 1.20 2.52 6.64 LSD 3.66 20.16 0.4256 6.897 0.039 0.5236 276.8 Grand Mean 100.20 64.189 4.707 51.64 1.96 12.32 2472.68 Means followed by same letter within a column are not significantly different at 0.05 probability level Where: Ph= Plant height (cm), Dm=Days to maturity, Hws = hundred seed weight (gm), Gyld = Grain yield (kg/ha), Brch=number of branch per plant, Seed= number of seed per pod and Pod= number of pods per plant, CV= Coefficient of Variation, LSD=Least Significant Difference.
  • 5. Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 407 The analysis of variance revealed that there was a significant difference among the varieties and the average yield for pawe1 (3369.3 kg/ha) followed by Pawe -2 (3365kg/ha), pawe-3 (2995kg/ha) and the local check Belessa-95 (2579.3kg/ha) at Mambuk woreda, (Table6). In this case the farmers’ preferences coincide with the breeders’ selection. The evaluations mean score for each variety ranged from 1476.2 kg/ha to 3369.3 kg/ha. The highest score was recorded by pawe-1 and pawe-2, whereas the lost was recorded by Gizo (TGX-1885-33F (1476.2 kg/ha) at Mambuk (Table6). Whereas the evaluation mean score of soybean variety tested at Mandura woreda, the highest score was recorded by pawe-1(2938.2kg/ha) followed by pawe-2 (2022.9 kg/ha) and the local check balassa-95 (1898.1kg/ha)(Table5), at Mandura woreda. All the three varieties which were selected by farmers are relatively recent released varieties when they are compared with the other varieties within their late maturity groups, but the farmers are being cultivated for the older varieties (Belesa-95 and Ethio- Yugoslavia) in the two selected woreda. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION In this study the pair wise matrix analysis explained that farmers in Mandura District gave priority to pod/plant during Soybean varietal selection. Secondly, they gave preference to seed yield and Disease resistance respectively. Farmers in Mambuk District mainly were focused on seed yield and subsequently, they gave equal emphasis to seed/pod and Disease resistant varieties. These imply that to enhance farmer’s preference towards Soybean improvement program, the current breeding program needs to give attention to the aforementioned traits in the two districts. Both the agronomic and farmers preference data analysis revealed that Pawe-1 has been selected on both districts. As a result, this variety needs to be multiplied and disseminated to producers and farmers that are playing a great role in soybean seed system ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are grateful to the project AGRA-Soybean seed system for providing funding during the research period. Special thanks also go to Pawe Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research (EIAR) for convincing the AGRA-seed system to consider soybean commodity. Special thanks also go with all participating farmers, agricultural experts and Development Agents (DA) of Mandura and Mambuk District for their cooperation and honesty in making farmers to participate actively on varietal selection from beginning up to the end of selection and evaluation processes. REFERENCES Central Statistical Agency (CSA) 2015.Agricultural sample survey 2014/15. Report on area production of crops (private peasant holdings, Meher Season).The FDRE statistical bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia De Boef and Thijssen (2006). Participatory tools working with crops, varieties and seeds guide for Professionals applying participatory approaches in the agro biodiversity management, crop Improvement and seed sector development wageningen, wageningen international 83p. Dixit Ajay K, JIX Antony, Navin K, Sharma, Rakesh K Tiwari, 2011. Soybean constituents and their Functional benefits.University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881 0809, USA. Gomez and Gomez, 1984 Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2ed. John Willey and Sons, New York Osiru, D.S.O.1, Balyejusa-Kizito, E.2, Bisikwa, J.1, Baguma, Y.3 & Turyagyenda, L.1, 2010. Participatory Selection and development of drought tolerant cassava varieties for farmersin marginal areas. Research Application Summary. Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 20 - 24 September 2010, Entebbe, Uganda. Mahasi, J. M, Vanlauwe, B. Mursoy, R.C. Mbehero, P, Mukalama, J., 2010. Increasing Productivity of Soybean in Western Kenya through Evaluation and Farmer Participatory Variety Selection. Majid M, Rosnah M, Mohammad R. (2010). Determining and ranking essential criteria of Construction Project Selection in Telecommunication of North KhorasanIran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, No. 1 ISSN:2010-0264 Ministry of Agriculture (2013). Animal and Plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Crop Variety Register ISSUE NO. 15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Mukalama, J., 2010. Increasing Productivity of Soybean in Western Kenya through Evaluation and Farmer Participatory Variety Selection. Seltene Abady, Addisu Getahun, Mulgeta Atnaf and Zinaw Dilnesaw, (2016): Participatory soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill) Variety Selection under Rain Fed Condition of Pawe District, North-Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Science and Mathematics Volume 3, Issue 1, ISSN (Online): 2394-2894 Accepted 9 September 2018 Citation: Hunde D, Tefera G (2018). Participatory Varietal Selection and Evaluation of twelve Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties for Lowland areas of North Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 5(2): 403-407. Copyright: © 2018 Hunde and Tefera. This is an open- access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.