Performance evaluation with a

International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics ( IJMNCT) Vol. 4, No.5,October 2014
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITH A
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MIMO CHANNEL ON
THE BASIS OF DOPPLER SHIFT AND OTHER
PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS IN FADING
ENVIRONMENT
Sutanu Ghosh
Dr. Sudhir Chandra Sur Degree Engineering College
ABSTRACT
At this present scenario, the demand of the system capacity is very high in wireless network. MIMO
technology is used from the last decade to provide this requirement for wireless network antenna
technology. MIMO channels are mostly used for advanced antenna array technology. But it is most
important to control the error rate with enhanced system capacity in MIMO for present-day progressive
wireless communication. This paper explores the frame error rate with respect to different path gain of
MIMO channel. This work has been done in different fading scenario and produces a comparative analysis
of MIMO on the basis of those fading models in various conditions. Here, it is to be considered that
modulation technique as QPSK to observe these comparative evaluations for different Doppler frequencies.
From the comparative analysis, minimum amount of frame error rate is viewed for Rician distribution at
LOS path Doppler shift of 0 Hz. At last, this work is concluded with a comparative bit error rate study on
the basis of singular parameters at different SNR levels to produce the system performance for uncoded
QPSK modulation.
KEYWORDS
MIMO, OSTBC Encoder-Combiner, Rician, Rayleigh, correlation, MMSE, ML.
I. INTRODUCTION
Today, all the mobile users have required higher data rate with better quality of service. This
higher capacity can be reached using MIMO technology [1]. MIMO is an antenna array
technology with different correlation [2] pattern. Correlation is observed in between two different
channels. On the basis of this correlation there are three different levels – high, medium and low.
Higher amount of capacity can be achieved through low level correlation. These correlation levels
are combined with different antenna array pattern – 2X2; 4X4 or, 8X8 etc. 4X4 array pattern
means, each of the both end at transmitter and receiver side has four antennas. Specifically, 2X2
and 4X4 have less amount of correlation [3]. So, these two arrays are mostly used for the
transmission of data. In this paper, I have used 4X4 antenna array for MIMO communication
channel. Here, MIMO channel is worked with different fading model- Rayleigh fading
distribution model and Rician fading distribution model. This fading is the most considerable
issue for present day wireless communication system. Rayleigh [4] and Rician [5, 6] are very well
known statistical distribution for amplitude modeling of radio signal in fading environment. In
this research, I have worked with two different LOS path doopler shift [7] for Rician fading
DOI : 10.5121/ijmnct.2014.4503 35

model. Any kind of mobile communication, antenna receives a large number of reflected and
scattered waves from various directions. The instantaneous power of these received signals with
Rayleigh/ Rician distribution follows the exponential function. In this work, I have considered a
binary source to generate the information, which has been modulated by QPSK modulator. The
information symbols output of QPSK Modulator is encoded by OSTBC Encoder [8] by using
either the Alamouti code [9, 10] for two transmit antennas or other generalized complex
orthogonal codes for three or four transmit antennas. The input as number of transmit antennas is
given to the encoder and output of this encoder is an (Ns x Nt) variable-size matrix, where the
number of columns (Nt) corresponds to the number of transmit antennas and the number of rows
(Ns) corresponds to the number of orthogonal code samples transmitted over each transmit
antenna in a frame. The output of this block can be passed to the MIMO channel and finally
received at OSTBC combiner [11]. The function of this combiner is to combine the received
signal with different channel state information and to estimate the modulated symbols. The input
signal of this combiner is an (Ns x Nr) variable-size matrix. The QPSK Demodulator block
demodulates the output of OSTBC Combiner, which is a recovered modulated signal using the
quaternary phase shift keying method.
Before this work, there was little research on the basis of behavior of MIMO channel. Ref. [12]
introduced new algorithms for the construction of approximate minimum-error-rate linear MIMO
receiver. But they didn’t explain the effect of this algorithm at different level of Doppler
frequency. Ref. [13] illustrated the packet error rate for different alamouti scheme [14] or receive
diversity and symbol error rate for different antenna configuration with various realistic
parameters. But this work didn’t explain the effect of MIMO at different fading model. Ref. [15]
described only the bit error rate for different level of SNR with the help of the parameters -
maximum likelihood detection [16] and QPSK modulation. So, these works are not sufficient for
the analysis of system performance on the problem of frame error rate at different level of
Doppler frequency and different fading model. To the best of my knowledge, this kind of work
has not been done for MIMO. So, I have worked on this issue to execute a performance analysis
on the basis of a comparative graphical result.
The remaining portions of this paper are arranged as follows: Sections II and III, describes an
overview of MIMO Channel with OSTBC Encoder-Combiner and Binary data generator with
QPSK modulator-demodulator respectively. Simulation and experimental results is illustrated in
Section IV. Finally, this paper is concluded in Section V.
II. MIMO CHANNEL WITH OSTBC ENCODER AND OSTBC
COMBINER:
In this work, MIMO channel is introduced with different values of Doppler frequencies. This
MIMO technology have different types of antenna array configuration (2X2, 4X4, 8X8 etc) with
different level of correlation as shown in Figure 1. Channel correlation is an evaluation of
similarity or likeliness of two or, more different channels. There are three different correlation
levels - High, Low and Medium. Here, this MIMO channel is worked with two different fading
models. These models include Rayleigh and Rician distribution for different levels of Doppler
frequency.
36

Figure 1: MIMO channel antenna configuration
[a] Rayleigh model is mathematically
probability distribution function of instantaneous power of Rayleigh
exponential distribution property
[17] –
p (m) =
…(1) where,
m
0 m = E[m] = {
0
m
m
E[m] is average and 22 is mean square value.
mathematical manipulation over clarke’s reference model [18, 19]. The low pass Rayleigh fading
process [20] can be mathematically
u(t) =
N
+ Y +

= =
… ... (2)
where, i and i are angle of incoming wave and initial phase associated with i
wd is maximum angular Doppler frequency occurring when
selections of i and i are not unique
results against eq. 2.
[b] Rician, another fading model has fixed LOS component. It considers that dominant
wave can be a phasor sum of two or more dominant signals (like, ground reflection, line of sight
etc.). It is treated as a deterministic process. A sinusoid signal
Rician multipath channel can be
o(t) = c c A cosw
N
+ + Y
i c i t t
… …(3)
where, Ac is the amplitude of line of sight component (Rayleigh fading is recovered for
of Ac = 0), i is the amplitude of i
N identify the reflected and scattered wave.
over (local-mean) scattered power is defined as Rician
K =
m
c
2
2a
…(4)
If, value of K is 0 then channel is Rayleigh and
2 is local-mean scattered power and
1
m c is power of dominant component. The probability
defined as [6] –
distribution function of Rician model is de
with different path gain m11, m12, m21 and m22
expressed by Rayleigh distribution function. The
model
property. The probability distribution function of power is defined
exp( )
1
0 0
m
−
2 m.p(m)}dm = 2a
Rayleigh fading process can be illustrated from the
described as –
{ 2cos( cos ) 2cos( sin
2
1 i
1
d
N
i
d i i w t j w t
M
a
th propagation path,
i = 0. It should be characterize
unique; however, different selections will proceed
i(t) = cos(ct) received over a
characterized as –

=
i
1
a cos(w )
th reflected wave, i is the phase of ith reflected wave and i =1to
The ratio of signal power in dominant component
K-factor [6].
2
for AWGN, K is .
2
2
37
d follows the
. by
… …
+ Q )}
i i
a
characterized that
for different
… …
the value
… … …

International Journal of Mobile Network Communications Telematics ( IJMNCT) Vol. 4, No.5,October 2014
38
pZ(x) = exp[ ( ) / 2 ] ( )
0 2
2 2 2
a
2 a
a
m
m
xc
x c I
x
− + , x 0,
where, 22 = , ¹0
2 [ ]
i i i E s is average power in non-LOS multipath components and cm
2 = 0
2 is
power in LOS component. The function I0 is modified Bessel function of 0th order and Z =
2 2 x + y , where, x and y is two Gaussian random variable, both with mean 0 and equal
variance.
These two fading model is associated with MIMO configuration and performed with two more
blocks – OSTBC encoder [21] at transmitter and OSTBC combiner [22] at receiver side. OSTBC
Encoder block encodes input symbol sequence using orthogonal space-time block code (OSTBC).
Function of this block is to map input symbols block-wise and concatenates the output codeword
matrices in time domain. OSTBC Encoder block supports five different OSTBC encoding
algorithms on the basis of different rate and number of transmitting antennas, as shown in Table -
I. There are 5 different OSTBC codeword [23] matrix for these 5 different OSTBC encoding
algorithm.
Table –I : Symbol Rate Adaptation for Different Number of Transmit Antennas
Number of transmit
antennas
Symbol Rate
2 1
3 ½
3 ¾
4 ½
4 ¾
This encoder supports time and spatial domains for OSTBC transmission and supports also an
optional dimension; where encoding calculation is independent through that domain. This
dimension may be thought of as a frequency domain.
The received information from all different receiver antennas is combined through the OSTBC
combiner at receiving section. Input channel estimation may not be fixed during each codeword
block transmission and combining algorithm uses only an approximation for first symbol period
per codeword block. Symbol demodulator or decoder would follow Combiner block of MIMO
communications system. It supports to combine each symbol independently using the combining
algorithm depends on the structure of OSTBC. Combiner supports 5 different algorithm same as
that of encoding algorithm. Computation algorithm per codeword block length is different for 5
different algorithms.
III. BINARY DATA GENERATOR WITH QPSK MODULATOR AT
TRANSMITTER AND DEMODULATOR AT RECEIVER OF MIMO
CHANNEL
Binary data is generated by a source with Bernoulli distribution [24]. Output of this source may
be frame based or sample based. Both of these two frames or sample can be expressed through a
matrix. The output of this source is modulated by any kind of modulator. Here, I have used only
QPSK modulator at transmitter side and demodulator at receiver side. This modulator generates a
modulated symbol for every 2 successive input bits. Figure 2 depicts the total system
representation of a robust MIMO channel [25 - 27] with OSTBC encoder and combiner.

Figure 2: Block diagram of MIMO system
IV. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
In this research work, I have used a set of parameters to execute the simulation.
been simulated in MATLAB. In
to propagate signal in the system
velocity is utilized to measure the radial velocity of moving object.
performance is calculated on the basis of
with signal to noise ratio. Those parameters are as follows
this simulation work, I have considered 2 or more discrete paths
and gains of these paths are computed in decibels.
d Doppler
d In this work, system
Table
This work has
frame error rate, Doppler frequency and
–
–II : SIMULATION PARAMETERS
Name of the parameters Value
Type of Antenna Array 4 X 4
Modulation type QPSK
Type of fading model Rayleigh and
Rician
LOS path Doppler shift taken as 0 and 100
Hz
The total result can be subdivided into two different categories. One includes all the frame error
rate calculations with different level of Doppler frequencies.
frame error rate for different values of sample rate.
calculations for different level probabilistic parameters.
MATLAB and validated through Qualnet 6.1 simulation software
RESULTS
Here, I have produced the results of
Next section includes the bit error rate
This work has been simulated in
[28].
In the first category, frame error rate has been calculated for three different cases and for all
those cases, discrete path delay is assumed to be 0 value. Figure 3 shows the frame error rate for
different path gain at 100 Hz
Doppler shift. The graphical comparison is done
of two
39
his bit error rate
on the basis

Figure 3: Graphical analysis of frame error rate for different fading model at maximum Doppler shift of 100
40
Hz
different fading model. In these evaluations, I have considered two different conditions for Rician
model on the basis of LOS path Doppler shift. It is very easy to observe the lowest frame error
rate is occurred for 0 Hz Rician model.
Hz

41
Hz
Figure 4 and 5 presents the comparative analysis at 50 and 25 Hz Doppler shift respectively. It is
very obvious that highest frame rate is observed for Rayleigh fading model. The lowest frame
error rate is viewed for LOS path Doppler shift of 100 Hz Rician fading model at 25 Hz. If the
amount of Doppler shift is increased to 50 Hz and above then lowest frame error rate is observed
for LOS path Doppler shift of 0 Hz Rician fading model. So, high frequency of Doppler shift is
better for LOS path Doppler shift of 0 Hz Rician model on the basis of frame error rate.
Figure 6: Graphical analysis of frame error rate for different values of sample rate in MIMO system

This Figure 6 presents the graphical result of frame error rate for different values of sample rate.
This frame error rate is increased for higher values of sample rate. From initial level frame error
rate is decreased upto the value of 2X106, then it is increased sharply with the enhanced sample
rate. The minimum value of frame error rate is observed at sample rate of 2X106.
This section has described the results of bit error rate (BER) for different probabilistic variables –
maximum likelihood (ML), minimum mean square error (MMSE) for different equalization
scheme. ML is a mathematical algorithm to find the useful data from the noisy data stream.
MMSE algorithm is used to reduce the noise power. Zero forcing (ZF) equalizer applies the
inverse transfer function of the channel frequency response to received signal to bring back the
signal after the channel. Here results are compared with zero forcing equalizer output and final
comparative outcome is plotted in Figure 7. In this comparison, ML has the lowest BER with
respect to other scheme. This ML has almost 0 BER at 20 dB SNR level.
42
Figure 7: Graphical comparison for different pre-allocate variables in 4x4 uncoded QPSK system
V. CONCLUSION
This paper investigates an idea about the performance evaluation on the basis of frame error rate
for different frequency of Doppler shift in different types of fading model. I studied that frame
error rate for Rayleigh fading is almost same for three different Doppler frequency shift (25, 50
and 100 Hz) of my experiment. From the experimental result, it can be concluded that Rician
fading channel is far better than Rayleigh fading channel for the reduction of frame error rate. If
the velocity of mobile object is increased at that time Rician model is performed superior than
Rayleigh model.
I have produced another result for bit error rate at 4X4 system. From this result, it is proved that
bit error rate is lowest and system performance is stabilized at high level of SNR for ML
equalization method. The comparative result of this paper will serve a great future path for further
research work.

43
REFERENCES
[1] Goldsmith, A., Jafar, S. A., Jindal, N., and Vishwanath, S., “Capacity limits of MIMO channels”, IEEE
Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 684-702, Jun. 2003.
[2] Kermoal, J. P., Schumacher, L., Pedersen, K. I., Mogensen, P. E., and Frederiksen, F., “A stochastic
MIMO radio channel model with experimental validation”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
Communications, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1211-1226, Aug. 2002.
[3] Ozcelik, H., Herdin, M., Hofstetter, H., and Bonek, E., “Capacity of different MIMO systems based on
indoor measurements at 5.2 GHz”, in proc. IEEE Personal Mobile Communications Conference (5th
European Conf. Publ. No. 492), pp. 463-466, DOI : 10.1049/cp:20030298, Apr. 2003.
[4] Rappaport, T. S., “Wireless communications: principles and practice”, New Jersey: prentice hall PTR,
vol. 2, 1996.
[5] Yang, Hong-Chuan and M-S. Alouini. Closed-form formulas for the outage probability of wireless
communication systems with a minimum signal power constraint, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1689-1698, Nov. 2002.
[6] Goldsmith, A., “Wireless communications”, Cambridge university press, 2005.
[7] Smulders, P., “Exploiting the 60 GHz band for local wireless multimedia access: prospects and future
directions”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 140-147, Jan. 2002.
[8] Love, D. J., and Heath, R. W., “Limited feedback unitary precoding for orthogonal space-time block
codes”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 64-73, Jan. 2005.
[9] Sethuraman, B. A., and Rajan, B. S., “An algebraic description of orthogonal designs and the
uniqueness of the alamouti code”, in proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002,
GLOBECOM'02, vol. 2, pp. 1088-1092, DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2002.1188364, Nov. 2002.
[10] Simon, M. K., and Vilnrotter, V. A., “Alamouti-type space-time coding for free-space optical
communication with direct detection”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.
35-39, Jan. 2005.
[11] Niroopan, P., Bandara, K., and Chung, Y. H., “A High Performance and Bandwidth Efficient IDMA
Scheme with Large Receiver MIMO Technologies”, in proc. Springer Advanced in Computer Science and
its Applications, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 459-465, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41674-3_65, 2014.
[12] Gesbert, D., “Robust linear MIMO receivers: A minimum error-rate approach”, IEEE Transactions on
Signal Processing, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 2863-2871, Nov. 2003.
[13] Paulraj, A. J., Gore, D. A., Nabar, R. U., and Bolcskei, H., “An overview of MIMO communications-a
key to gigabit wireless”, in proc. of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 198-218, Feb. 2004.
[14] Alamouti, S., “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications”, IEEE Journal on
Selected Areas in Communications, vol.16, no. 8, pp. 1451-1458, 1998.
[15] Zhu, X., and Murch, R. D., “Performance analysis of maximum likelihood detection in a MIMO
antenna system”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 187-191, Feb. 2002.
[16] Damen, M. O., El Gamal, H., and Caire, G., “On maximum-likelihood detection and the search for the
closest lattice point”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2389-2402, Oct. 2003.
[17] Ghosh, S., “Performance Analysis on The Basis of a Comparative Study Between Multipath Rayleigh
Fading And AWGN Channel in The Presence of Various Interference”, International journal of Mobile
Network Communications Telematics ( IJMNCT), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15-22, February 2014.
[18] Clarke, R. H., “A statistical theory of mobile‐radio reception”, Bell system technical journal, vol. 47,
no. 6, pp. 957-1000, 1968.

[19] Jakes, W. C., and Cox, D. C., “Microwave mobile communications”, Wiley-IEEE Press, 1994.
[20] Zheng, Y. R., and Xiao, C., “Improved models for the generation of multiple uncorrelated Rayleigh
fading waveforms”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 256-258, Jun. 2002.
[21] Love, D. J., and Heath, R. W., “Limited feedback unitary precoding for orthogonal space-time block
codes”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 64-73, Jan. 2005.
[22] Cattoni, A. F., Le Moullec, Y., and Sacchi, C., “Efficient FPGA implementation of a STBC-OFDM
combiner for an IEEE 802.16 software radio receiver”, Springer Telecommunication Systems, vol. 56, no.
2, pp. 245-255, 2014.
[23] Lau, Y. S., Lin, K. H., and Hussain, Z. M., “Space-time encoded secure chaos communications with
transmit beamforming”, in proc. IEEE TENCON 2005, Melbourne, Qld., pp. 1-5, DOI :
10.1109/TENCON.2005.301120, Nov. 2005.
[24] Forbes, C., Evans, M., Hastings, N., and Peacock, B., “Statistical distributions”, John Wiley Sons,
2011.
[25] Weichselberger, W., Herdin, M., Ozcelik, H., and Bonek, E., “A stochastic MIMO channel model with
joint correlation of both link ends”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90-
100, Jan. 2006.
[26] P. Soma, D. S. Baum, V. Erceg, R. Krishnamoorthy, and A. J. Paulraj, “ Analysis and modeling of
multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radio channel based on outdoor measurements conducted at 2.5
GHz for fixed BWA applications”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Communication, vol. 1, New York,
pp. 272–276, DOI : 10.1109/ICC.2002.996859, Apr.-May 28 – 2, 2002.
[27] S. Sandhu, R. U. Nabar, D. A. Gore, and A. Paulraj, “Near-optimal selection of transmit antennas for a
MIMO channel based on Shannon capacity”, in Proc. 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and
Computers, vol. 1, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 567–571, DOI : 10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911019, Oct.-Nov, 29–1,
2000.
[28] Qulanet Simulator, Scalable Network Technologies, available at: www. qualnet.com, 2012.
44

Performance evaluation with a

More Related Content

What's hot (17)

Similar to Performance evaluation with a (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Performance evaluation with a