Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing Hadoop Cluster

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
Vol.8, No.6, December2018, pp. 5089~5097
ISSN: 2088-8708, DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v8i6.pp5089-5097  5089
Journal homepage: http://iaescore.com/journals/index.php/IJECE
Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing
Hadoop Cluster
Jyoti Parsola, Durgaprasad Gangodkar, Ankush Mittal
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era University, India
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Mar 5, 2018
Revised Jul 4, 2018
Accepted Jul 29, 2018
Rapid advancement in technology and in-expensive camera has raised the
necessity of monitoring systems for surveillance applications. As a result
data acquired from numerous cameras deployed for surveillance is
tremendous. When an event is triggered then, manually investigating such a
massive data is a complex task. Thus it is essential to explore an approach
that, can store massive multi-stream video data as well as, process them to
find useful information. To address the challenge of storing and processing
multi-stream video data, we have used Hadoop, which has grown into a
leading computing model for data intensive applications. In this paper we
propose a novel technique for performing post event investigation on stored
surveillance video data. Our algorithm stores video data in HDFS in such a
way that it efficiently identifies the location of data from HDFS based on the
time of occurrence of event and perform further processing. To prove
efficiency of our proposed work, we have performed event detection in the
video based on the time period provided by the user. In order to estimate the
performance of our approach, we evaluated the storage and processing of
video data by varying (i) pixel resolution of video frame (ii) size of video
data (iii) number of reducers (workers) executing the task (iv) the number of
nodes in the cluster. The proposed framework efficiently achieve speed up of
5.9 for large files of 1024X1024 pixel resolution video frames thus makes it
appropriate for the feasible practical deployment in any applications.
Keyword:
Hadoop Distributed File System
Map Reduce
Reducers
Copyright © 2018 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.
All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Jyoti Parsola,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India.
Email: jyotee.negi@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION
Intelligent video surveillance system (VSS) has evolved as an active study area in computer vision
because of its numerous real time applications for social security. It intends to detect, identify and track the
object in various video frames or image sequence. The motive behind is to establish an intelligent visual
surveillance system and reinstate the traditional surveillance system due to deployment of multiple cameras
for continuous monitoring. When an event occurs then the capability to perform scalable and timely analytics
to this extensive accumulated data is a high preference for every intelligent VSS. Therefore the major
challenges faced by video surveillance system are; a) Storage of continuously increasing gigantic data,
generated by the multiple surveillance cameras. b) Prompt processing of progressively rising data when an
event is triggered
Processing and storing consistently growing data with conventional network storage and database
system is not an easy task. Hadoop, which was originally designed by Google, has evolved into dominant
processing model for such applications which are data exhaustive [1]. It’s extensible, tolerant to error and
splits and copy data, sends the computation where data resides. Hadoop has received so much recognition
because of its easy accessibility.

 ISSN:2088-8708
Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 8, No. 6, December 2018 : 5089 - 5097
5090
The structure of Hadoop is very rigid so it is not trivial to develop and deploy the complex
algorithms to the MapReduce model. Although a lot of research have been performed for video processing
[2]-[6] with Hadoop, yet it has not been utilized for post event investigation. Thus the motivation of our work
is given as follows:
 Handle multiple streams from various surveillance cameras.
 Storage and timely analysis of extensively accumulated massive data to identify an event of interest.
 Speed up in performance
We have used Hadoop for storage and processing single stream surveillance data on a single node
cluster as discussed in [7]. In this paper, we propose a framework for post event investigation as shown in
Figure 1, which stores the multi-stream data accumulated from multiple cameras deployed for video
surveillance application, into the HDFS. If an event occurs then, user sends query to analyze the required data
along with the time duration when the event is suspected to occur. Based on the time duration, the system
identifies the location of the data residing in the DataNode in the cluster and computation is executed by
Hadoop MapReduce. Our proposed approach for post event investigation of such a massive data, overcomes
the need for analysis of entire data generated by the set of video cameras deployed for monitoring purpose
thus reducing the computation time.
The remaining paper is arranged in the following way, section II discusses the relevant study
performed by various researchers. Section III discusses the architecture of post event investigation with
Hadoop and analyses the algorithm proposed for multi-stream video data processing and storage with
Hadoop section IV which shows results and performance analysis and section V discusses the conclusion.
Figure 1. Framework for post event investigation with hadoop
2. RELATED WORK
It has been shown in [1] that Hadoop Mapreduce is appropriate for processing text data which
require same computation to be performed in the entire massive data residing in the HDFS. Therefore
initially MapReduce was used for the problems like searching, sorting large data, large scale indexing, graph
computation [8] matrix computation [9]. Some researchers have tried to use it for image processing and large
scale query processing and query search as well [10], [11]. In [12] parallel execution of scattered database is
performed. A colored image is converted into grayscale image and parallely features are drawn out. High
resolution images are processed and features are removed with Hadoop MapReduce [13]. Hadoop
MapReduce framework is also utilized for application like image retrieval based on the content [14]. An
image refinement method with MapReduce is discussed in [15]. It needs images to be streamed only once
compared to other file system which needs each time entire image or part of image streamed after applying
filter. [16] Proposed a distributed image processing system named SEIP, which is built on Hadoop, and
employs extensible in node architecture to support various kinds of image processing algorithms on
distributed platforms with GPU accelerators. [17] Have used hadoop for clustering categorical data.
Few research investigators have used video data processing [18] (video transcoding) with Hadoop
MapReduce framework as discussed by [2]. [3] Performs parallel video analysis and processing whereas
video playing, sharing and storage [4] with Hadoop cluster. Hadoop has been used for large video
management [5] and for Object detection and classification [6]. The work implemented in [19] is the
distributed visual enhancement using histogram equalization algorithm on image database from surveillance
cameras. The experiment is conducted in pseudo distributed mode under Hadoop MapReduce architecture.
VnV2V1
…
Output
Video Streams
User
Query
Slave n
Slave 1
Master
Slave 2
Slave i

Int J Elec& Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 
Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing Hadoop Cluster (Jyoti Parsola)
5091
Hence based on the above literature survey it is evident that Hadoop MapReduce has not been
utilized for post event investigation applications and moreover the problem of multiple streams storage and
processing of surveillance data is still a challenge.
3. ARCHITECTURE FOR HADOOP AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI STREAM VIDEO DATA
USING HADOOP
We have designed our event investigation system based on a MapReduce framework for data
storage and data processing. Hadoop is an open source software framework licensed by an apache, it is used
for distributed processing [20], [21], [26], [27] and distributed depository of extensive dataset across group of
nodes build on low priced computers. Traits intrinsic to Hadoop are data partitioning and parallel
computation of large datasets. Its storage and computational capabilities scale with the addition of hosts to a
Hadoop cluster, and can reach volume of sizes in the petabytes on clusters with thousands of hosts. It
comprises of two principal elements as discussed in [7]. First is Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS)
used for distributed file system, second is MapReduce which is the execution engine or data processing
framework as shown in Figure 2.
The analysis of the multi-stream video data using Hadoop is done in three different phases
 Storing the multi-stream video data to the HDFS
 Processing multi-stream video data with mapreduce
 Accumulating all the results and displaying the result.
In VSS, data accumulated from various cameras deployed for monitoring purpose is massive and
continuously keep on increasing. Question is to store such an extremely large data. Moreover the issue
becomes more complex when an event is triggered and the data is to be processed to extract the useful
information regarding any event. Traditional method used for extracting useful information is to check the
entire database, which is computationally expensive. There should be some measure where the user can
search the particular data based on the time of occurrence of event, instead of searching the entire database.
Therefore for this purpose Hadoop HDFS is used. Data in HDFS is processed in batches. Therefore
streams are buffered into local memory and then data is transferred into the HDFS. Moreover Hadoop was
originally designed for text processing thus, there is no support in Hadoop for processing video data. We
extract frames from video stream and store them as Sequence file in the HDFS. Sequence files are Hadoop
particular archive file layouts very much like to tar and zip. It brings together the file set with a key and a
value combination where key is the file name and value is the content of file. The generated sequence file is
mostly half the size of the original data and hence takes limited memory area in HDFS converting it storage
efficient. These files can be separated and processed in parallel. For video analytic applications like motion
detection, rather than comparing every alternate frame it is sufficient to process every alternate fifth frame
[22].
3.1. Data Storage
Rather than storing all the video frames we store every alternate fifth frame which further reduces
the storage space in HDFS. We use a novel technique for storing the sequence files (frames) using
Algorithm 1. Every video camera is identified with a unique identifier like V1, V2,….,Vn while storing the
sequence file we generate the name of sequence file by concatenating camera identifier, date, time and frame
number, eg. V1_1_07_2016_10_12_22_1 where V1 is the name of the camera or stream, 1_07_2016 is the
date (Day_Month_Year format), 10_12_22 is the time (Hour_Minutes_Seconds format) and 1 is the frame
number. This approach facilitates appropriate identification of DataNode where the frame has been stored.
Thus overcoming the time required to search entire data accumulated so far. This data in the HDFS is
separated into blocks (default size of block is 64 Mb) and further stored in various nodes of the cluster. Each
block is replicated with 3 copies in the machines of the cluster.
Algorithm 1: Data storage in HDFS
Input: multiple video streams 𝑠 𝑛
Output: Sequence file
Step 1: For every video frame (𝑉𝑠) of 𝑠 𝑛
Store 𝑉𝑠 with the name as 𝑠 𝑛+ date + time+
Frame
number;
Vs +5;
Step 2: Convert stored 𝑉𝑠 to sequence file
Step 3: Copy Sequence file to the HDFS

 ISSN:2088-8708
5092
3.2. Data Processing
The Hadoop MapReduce work flow as shown in Figure 3, user enters the query with the time and
sends it to the master. In the master Jobtracker divides the job to various tasks and sends it to the Tasktracker
residing in the slave nodes. The tasks are executed by the map and reduce function respectively. The process
of DataNode identification and data processing algorithm is further discussed in Algorithm 2 Results is
accumulated by the TaskTracker and final output is generated. To prove the efficiency of our proposed work
we are finding motion in the video data on the basis of the time of occurrence of event as provided by the
user. Moving object detection based on motion segmentation is itself a challenge in VSS.
A lot of research have been performed for motion segmentation and has been broadly classified into
Background subtraction and temporal differencing. In background subtraction motion [23] is detected by
finding the difference between the present frame and the reference background whereas in case of temporal
difference [24] motion is determined by calculating the pixel wise difference between the present frame and
the earlier frame. The motion detection algorithm as proposed in [25], is used in our system for finding
moving objects. One of the efficient methods of frame differencing is block matching, for identifying moving
objects. In block matching as shown in Figure 7 the current frame 𝐶 𝑘 is divided into blocks and similarly
previous frame 𝑃𝑘 is also divided into blocks and the blocks of 𝑃𝑘 are searched into 𝐶 𝑘 so if a block of 𝑃𝑘 is
found in different pixel location in𝐶 𝑘 it implies that motion is produced.
Figure 3. Map reduce job execution flow for motion detection
Algorithm 2: Identification of DataNode & data Processing
Input: Data, time and duration of an event
Output: Resultant motion vector.
Step 1: User sends the query in the form of date and time to the master.
Step 2: Master sends the computation to the JobTrackerand NameNode
identifies data location
Step 3: JobTracker splits the job into the TaskTracker
Step 4: The computation is executed further by map and reduces in the
data residing in the data node and result is sent back to the
TaskTracker.
Step 5: JobTracker accumulates the result from TaskTracker and forwards
it to the master
Many techniques have been proposed by various scholars for performing matching computation.
Sum of Absolute Difference (SAD) is used in [25] for measuring the difference between the two video frame
block, as it is highly efficient. The lower value of SAD means the higher similarity between the two blocks. It
is calculated using eq.1.
𝑆𝐴𝐷(𝑥1, 𝑥2) = ∑ ∑ |𝐼 𝑝(𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑡1) − 𝐼𝑐
𝑏=𝑁−1
𝑎=0
(𝑎 + 𝑥1, 𝑗 + 𝑥2, 𝑡2)|
𝑏=𝑁−1
𝑎=0
(1)
Input
Job
Chunk Slave
Job MasterUser
Job
Chunk
Map Data
Split
Data
Split
Reduce
Reduce
Map
Map
OutputHDFS
Frame 1
Frame 2
Frame n

5093
where (𝑥1, 𝑥2) ={-z ≤ 𝑥1,𝑥2 ≤ z}
Motion vector (mv) = (𝑥1, 𝑥2)) |min sad (𝑥1, 𝑥2)) (2)
In (1) & (2) 𝐼 𝑝(,) and 𝐼𝑐(,) displays the intensity of pixels in the earlier and present frame
subsequently. SAD(𝑥1, 𝑥2) is the total value of absolute difference at the pixel location 𝑥1, 𝑥2 [-z, z] is the
search area in the search window. mv indicates the motion vector at smallest rate of SAD computed in frames
distant with time t1 and t2. Dimension of motion block is chosen for 16 x 16 and search window size is of 32
x32 pixels.
The job of computing motion vector in the scope between [-31, 32] into frames of a video is
computationally high priced, as a result search is started when, motion block is on the same position of the
reference frame i.e. block and search window are coinciding in middle. If there is no change then value of
SAD is zero and if a block includes movement then block presents the maximum value of absolute difference
SADo is computed with the ex.(3):
𝑆𝐴𝐷0 = ∑ ∑ |𝐼𝑟(𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑡1) − 𝐼𝑐
𝑏=𝑁−1
𝑎=0
𝑏=𝑁−1
𝑎=0
(𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑡2) (3)
where a , b indicates position of pixel in earlier (reference) and present frame.
Adding to this a threshold (th) is enforced to SADo to decrease processing time. It helps to determine
whether to initialize the search or not on the basis of ex.(4).
Search Decision = (4)
For each block mild th can be fixed as part of 256 X 15=3840 where, 256 is 16 X 16 block pixel
value. Part value lies within the range of( 0.4 ,0 .1).
The resultant is a set of motion vector. Accumulating all the results for every frame of a video final
motion is plotted. In order to find out the motion detection we use SAD to detect the motion in the video
frames as aforementioned. Map function reads two frames as an input and splits each frame into 32 by 32
pixel size blocks and each block is assigned a key and value containing the 32 by 32 block and this output is
called as intermediate data. Each key value pair is passed to the reduce function in such a manner that the
values containing the same key is passed to the same reducer. The task of motion detection is performed by
the reduce function and it finds the moving object based on motion segmentation.
3.3. Result Accumulation
Finally all the results computed by various reducers for all the blocks of the video frame are
accumulated a final output is obtained displaying the moving object on the corresponding video frames.
Algorithm 3 shows the data accumulation process. This approach can be used to detect the event in multiple
streams where the possible time of occurrence of the event is provided by the user. It can be observed from
the above explanation that our proposed approach can achieve the following
 Efficient Storage of multi-stream video data accumulated from numerous cameras deployed for
surveillance into the HDFS.
 Extract data based on the time of occurrence of event provided by the user.
 Analytics of the massive data with MapReduce in short time.
Algorithm 3: Data Accumulation
Input: Motion Vector for every frame
Output: Moving Object
Step1: Motion vectors are obtained for every set of
video frames.
Step 2: Results are accumulated.
Step 3: Motion vectors are plotted according to the user
query
4. RESULTS & PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
We have analyzed performance of our proposed framework in the following manner;
 By measuring the computation time for varying
1 If SADo<th
0 otherwise

 ISSN:2088-8708
5094
1) number of reducers (workers)
2) number of nodes building cluster
 Computational efficiency for higher pixel resolution video frames by varying the size of video frame.
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Figure 4. Shadow [28] (a) original frame (b) segmented moving object and Baseline [28] (c) Original frame
(d) Segmented moving object
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Figure 5. Intermittent Object Motion [28] (a) original frame (b) segmented moving object and Ground Truth
[29] (c) Original frame (d) Segmented moving object
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Figure 6. CAVIAR_Meet_WalkTogether1 [30] (a) Original frame (b) Segmented moving object and CAVIAR_
walk3 [30] (c) Original frame (d) Segmented moving object
The proposed work is implemented on Intel core i5 3.10 GHz with 4 GB of memory on Ubuntu
12.04 as an operating system Hadoop version is 1.2.1. We have used 5 and 10 nodes cluster for performance
evaluation. We have evaluated performance by varying file size and data size of a cluster and its affect on the
computation time. Detection of motion is driven on video frames (grayscale) with pixel size 256 X 256, 512
X 512 and 1024 X 1024. Colored video frame are converted to grayscale before processing. Calculated
motion detection on
various video sequences is displayed on figure 4 to 6. JavaCV which is wrapper for OpenCV library
[31] is used to plot motion vector. Figure 4 to 6 shows the original frame and the corresponding segmented
frames where motion is identified. Experiment is computed on standard dataset accessible openly Change
Detection Benchmark [28], Laboratory for Image & Media Understanding (LIMU) [29], Context Aware

5095
Vision Using Image-Based Active Recognition (CAVIAR) [30]. For analyzing MapReduce performance for
motion detection algorithm, Hadoop MapReduce Cluster is established. The cluster consists of 9 salve nodes
and 1 master node.
Our proposed framework efficiently reduces the storage space in HDFS and the results of data size
reduction are shown in Table 1. First column of the table represents the original data size, second column is
the data size which is reduced when only alternate fifth frame is stored the data reduction produced is about
80 -85 % and third column displays the data size reduction achieved by the compression due to the sequence
file generation and the compression is about 80%. The result clearly shows the efficiency of our approach in
terms of storage.
Table 1. Storage space reduction in HDFS.
Original Data Size Reduced Data size Sequence File compressed data
500 MB 100 MB 20 MB
1 GB 204.8 MB 40.96 MB
1.5 GB 307.5 MB 61.6 MB
2 GB 409.6 MB 81.92 MB
2.5 GB 511 MB 103.2 MB
4.1. Performance Evaluation on Multi Node Cluster
1) Analysing task execution time with varying number of nodes in the cluster.
The extensibility and robustness of the framework is evaluated by analysing the multi stream video
data on various nodes of the cluster. Experiment is executed with different number of nodes to be able to
understand speed up. Parallel speed up Spis measured as given by e.q. (5)
𝑆 𝑝 =
𝑇1
𝑇𝑛
(5)
where T1 is the total execution time calculated in one node cluster and Tn is the total execution time
calculated in n node cluster were n > 1. value of Sp shows the number of times parallel execution is faster
than running the same MapReduce algorithm on the single node cluster. If it is greater than 1, it entails that
there is at least some gain from doing the work in parallel. Execution time for video frames of pixel
resolution 256 x 256, 512 X 512 and 1024 X 1024 in sequential (a simple java program) and MapReduce
cluster of various nodes and computed speed up is shown in Figure 7. The processing time is the total time to
calculate motion detection in the required data size and we have searched 100 MB data in the HDFS as well
as in sequential and further performed motion detection in the respective data.
Figure 7. Speed up for motion detection algorithm of a) 256 X 256 pixel resolution video frame with
different number of nodes in a MapReduce cluster b) 512 X 512 pixel resolution video frame with different
number of nodes in a MapReduce cluster c) 1024 X 1024 pixel resolution video frame with different number
of nodes in a MapReduce cluster.
4.2. Analysing Task Execution Time by Varying Number of Reducers (Workers) Performing the Job
We have also analyzed the performance of motion detection algorithm by varying the number of
reducers (workers). Figure 8 shows the outcome of different number of reducer for various volumes of data
and various pixel size video frames. We also tested execution time by varying map tasks but results were not
0
1
2
3
4
500
MB
1GB 1.5
GB
2 GB 2.5
GB
5nodes (secs)
0
1
2
3
4
500
MB
1 GB 1.5 GB 2 GB 2.5 GB
5 nodes 10 nodes
0
2
4
6
8
500
MB
1 GB 1.5 GB 2 GB 2.5 GB
5 nodes 10 nodes

 ISSN:2088-8708
5096
remarkable. Execution time for smaller data volume is almost similar but for larger data volume reduction in
processing time is achieved considerably. The table clearly shows that it is not necessary that
 For low resolution video frame 250- 300 reducers on an average provides good results.
 For high resolution video frame 500- 700 reducers on an average provides good results.
Thus this gives prior information to set the number of reducers for computation as finding the
number of reducers providing efficient result is a tedious task.
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 8. Motion detection computation time for (a) 256 X 256 pixels (in seconds) size video frame of
various data size with varying number of reducers, (b) 512 X 512 (in seconds) pixel size video of various
data size with varying number of reducers, (c) 1024 X 1024 (in seconds) pixel size video frame of various
data size with varying number of reducers
5. CONCLUSION
We have proposed and implemented an efficient approach for performing post event investigation
on massive volume of surveillance data which is one of the challenges of Video Surveillance system. We
have used Hadoop HDFS for distributed storage and Hadoop MapReduce for parallel and distributed
processing of massive accumulated multi-stream video data. We have proposed an algorithm for efficient
storing video data in the HDFS. Hence when an event is triggered we automatically extract data based on the
time of occurrence of event and process it further to find useful information. To prove the competence of our
proposed approach in handling and processing extremely huge data, we have implemented motion detection
algorithm in Hadoop cluster.
Hadoop cluster consists of maximum of 10 nodes. Our experiment result precisely indicates that the
computing period is shortened, when pixel resolution of video frame is increased. We also analyzed the
performance by measuring the computation time for varying number of reducers (workers). Network latency
also affects the execution time in a cluster. To solve this issue execution time can be further improved.
Moreover through the increment in number of nodes of a cluster, computation time can be cut down more.
Our framework is robust and can cope with varying number of nodes in the cluster as well as increasing data
volume. Hadoop performs excellent for application which need similar task to be performed in distinct data
sizes; hence application requiring different jobs to be performed in various data sets in aligned manner is not
possible with Hadoop MapReduce.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, "Map Reduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Cluster", ACM Commun., vol. 51,
no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2008.
[2] R. Pereira, K. Breitman, "A Cloud Based Architecture for Improving Video Compression Time Efficiency: The
Split &Merge Approach", In 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 482 – 489, 2010.
[3] H. Tan and L. Chen, "An approach for fast and parallel video processing on Apache Hadoop clusters", IEEE Int.
conf. on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), vol. 1, no. 6, 2014.
[4] C. Liu, et al., "A distributed video share system based on Hadoop", in IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. on Cloud Computing and
Intelligence Systems (CCIS), pp. 587-590, November, 2014.
[5] X. Liu, et al. "A Distributed Video Management Cloud Platform Using Hadoop", IEEE Access, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.
2637-2643, 2015.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
100 150 200 250 300 350
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
500
MB
1 GB 1.5
GB
2 GB 2.5
GB
100 150 200 250 300 350
0
500
1000
1500
300 500 700 800 1000

5097
[6] Yaseen, et al., "Cloud-based scalable object detection and classification in video streams", Future Generation
Computer Systems, vol. 80, pp. 286-298, 2018.
[7] J. Parsola, et al., "Efficient Storage and Processing of Video Data for Moving Object Detection using Hadoop
MapReduce", in Int. Conf. on Signal, Networks, Computing and Systems (ICNCS-2016), JNU, New Delhi, India,
2016.
[8] J. Cohen, "Graph twiddling in a MapReduce world", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 29-
41, 2009.
[9] J. Myung, S.G Lee, "Exploiting inter-operation parallelism for matrix chain multiplication using MapReduce", J.
on Super Computing. vol. 66, no.1, pp. 594-609, 2013.
[10] H. Wang, et al., "Efficient query processing framework for big data warehouse: an almost join-free approach",
Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 224-236, 2015.
[11] J. Ahn et al. "SigMR: MapReduce based SPARQL query processing by signature encoding and multiway join", J.
on Super Computing,vol. 71, no.10, pp. 3695-3725, 2015.
[12] M. Yamamoto and K. Kaneko, "Parallel image database processing with mapreduce and performance evaluation in
pseudo distributed mode", Int. J. on Electronic Commerce Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp.211-228.
[13] H.D Zhu, et al., "Parallel Image Texture Feature Extraction under Hadoop Cloud Platform", Intelligent Computing
Theory. Springer Int. Publishing. 459-465.
[14] W. Premchaiswadi, et al.," Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes using Hadoop
MapReduce", IEEE Int. conf. on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp. 615-620, 2013.
[15] T.D. Gamage, et al.," Image filtering with MapReduce in pseudo-distribution mode", IEEE conf. on Moratuwa
Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). 160-164, 2015.
[16] T. Liu, et al., "SEIP: System for Efficient Image Processing on Distributed Platform", Journal of Computer Science
and Technology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1215-1232, 2015.
[17] G. Bathla, et al., "A Novel Approach for clustering Big Data based on MapReduce", Int. J. of Electrical and
Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1711-1719, 2018.
[18] A. Anjum, et al., "Video stream analysis in clouds: An object detection and classification framework for high
performance video analytics", IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2016.
[19] A. Azli, "Distributed visual enhancement on surveillance video with Hadoop Mapreduce and performance
evaluation in pseudo distributed mode," Australian J. of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no.9, pp.38,2014
[20] P.S.G Aruna Sri and M. Anusha, "Big data survey", Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics,
vol. 4, no. 1, 2018.
[21] S.A. Thanekar et al., "A Study on MapReduce: Challenges and Trends", Indonesian Journal of Electrical
Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 4, no.1, 2016.
[22] D. Gangodkar et al. "Robust segmentation of moving vehicles under complex outdoor conditions", IEEE
Transactions on Intell. Transp. Sys., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1738-1752, 2012.
[23] W.E.L Grimson and C. Stauffer, "Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking", In IEEE Conf.
Comput Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 22–29, 1999.
[24] Z. Yu and Y. Chen, "A real-time motion detection algorithm for traffic monitoring systems based on consecutive
temporal difference", In7th Conf of Asian Control Conference (ACC), pp. 1594-1599, 2009.
[25] D.Gangodkar et al. "Segmentation of moving objects in visible and thermal videos", Int. Conf of Computer
Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), pp. 1-5, 2012.
[26] White. T.: Hadoop: The Definitive Guide. Yahoo Press (2010)
[27] Holmes, A.: Hadoop in practice. Manning Publications Co.(2012)
[28] Change Detection Benchmark. Available: http://wordpress-jodoin.dmi.usherb.ca/dataset2014/
[29] Laboratory for Image & Media Understanding (LIMU). Available: http://limu.ait.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dataset/en/
[30] Context Aware Vision Using Image-Based Active Recognition (CAVIAR). Available
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CAVIARDATA1/
[31] Open Source Computer Vision (OpenCV) [Online]. Available: http://opencv.willowgarage.com/wiki/

Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing Hadoop Cluster

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing Hadoop Cluster (20)

More from IJECEIAES (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Post Event Investigation of Multi-stream Video Data Utilizing Hadoop Cluster