Power quality improvement in a weak bus system using facts controller

IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 12 | Dec-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 786
POWER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN A WEAK BUS SYSTEM USING
FACTS CONTROLLER
P. C. Pradhan1
, P. K. Ray2
, R. K. Sahu3
, J. K. Moharana4
1
Faculty and Research Scholar, Dept. of EE, DRIEMS, Cuttack, pratap_pin@yahoo.com
2
Dept. of EEE, IIIT, BBSR, pkrayiiit@gmail.com
3
Dept. of EE, VSSUT, Burla, rksahu123@gmail.com
4
Dept. of EEE, GITA, BBSR, jkrushna@gmail.com
Abstract
Power quality management is the main problem that the industry is facing today. This is mainly affected by the generation of
harmonics. The growing use of electronic equipment produces a large amount of harmonics in distribution systems because of non-
sinusoidal currents consumed by non-linear loads. As we know for the better quality of power, the voltage and current waveforms
should be sinusoidal, but in actual practice it is somewhat disturbed and this phenomenon is called “Harmonic Distortion”. Voltage
harmonics are generally present in supply of power from utility. Even though electronic and non-linear devices are flexible,
economical and energy efficient, they may degrade power quality by creating harmonic currents and consuming excessive reactive
power. The STATCOM as FACTS controller can be applied to a single non-linear load or many. It provides controlled current
injection to remove harmonic current from the source side of electric system and also can improve the power factor.
Keywords-: Controller design, PI Controller, FACTS and STATCOM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
Harmonic pollution is not a new phenomenon, issues of
harmonic components of voltage and / or current curves
occurred early in the industrial use of electricity, the first
mention regarding to the use of harmonic analysis as a way of
solving a practical electrical engineering problem, was made in
1893 by Steinmetz. Nowadays, in modern industry, about 50%
of receivers an industrial customer are supplied using frequency
converters (AC and DC adjustable drives), switching mode
power supply (for powering computer systems or process
controllers) and electronic ballasts. Due to the non-linear
characteristics of these receivers (using diodes, thyristors or
transistors to convert AC voltage in DC voltage and DC voltage
in AC voltage or DC voltage in DC voltage), in industrial
distribution systems harmonic currents occur. These, harmonic
currents, leads to the distortion of the voltage curve at the point
of common coupling (and in other parts of the distribution
system), so are affected and other customers, non-harmonic
polluting [1, 2]. Resonance phenomena can increase the
harmonic components of voltage that will lead to increase the
voltage in different parts of the electricity supply system,
overloading of transformers and, in particular capacitor [3].
Also, can causing losses increasing in overhead electric lines,
cable, transformers and capacitor banks, leading to acceleration
of insulation aging and reduction life. In four wire systems,
harmonic current with frequency multiple by three will be add
up in the neutral conductor, so the current through this reaches
high values. Given the negative consequences of harmonic
distortion the measures must be taken that would lead to
limitation of harmonic pollution in power networks. Measures
can be undertaken involving: reduce harmonic currents from
customers, changing the resonance frequency and filtering of
the harmonic distortion using passive, active or hybrid systems.
The filter design has become essential for distribution systems.
This work examines the feasibility of designing a filter size
such that the total investment cost, (in which unacceptable
voltage profiles must be correct and harmonic must be reduced
within the permissible maximal value e.g. IEEE Std. 519 [4]),
is keep at a minimum. Designing a harmonic filter has
conventionally been by a trial and error approach. Various
formulations for a more systematic approach to design
harmonic filters have been developed in the decade [1-3, 5-7].
Although effective in eliminating the harmonic, some of these
methods did not consider the cost of filter elements. Moreover,
other related investigation did not address whether or not the
issue of the filters can adhere to the industrial specifications.
The harmonic filter design problem has a partially discrete,
partially continuous formulation with a non-differentiable
nonlinear objective function. The non-differentiable nature,
originating from a circumstance in which the cost of capacitors
is step-wise, makes most nonlinear optimization techniques
difficult to apply. This type of problems has generally been
tackled by heuristic or approximate techniques. Simulation
results have been shown in this paper.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
As is well known, the current is proportional to the voltage in
case of a linear load as shown in Fig.1 (a) whereas the current
is not proportional to the voltage in case of non-linear load (as
shown in Fig.1 (b)). A linear load draws active power from the
grid with only fundamental component being present in the
current and absorbs/injects reactive power from/to the grid.
However, a non-linear load draws active power from the grid,
where the current has fundamental and harmonics. These
harmonics do not provide extra power but unnecessarily, yet
unavoidably, increase the system volt-ampere (VA). This
shows up as an increase in the rms current in the lines and leads
to an extra heating of the transmission conductors and system
elements. Hence, the compensation of reactive power is
necessary for both linear and non-linear loads. Harmonic
compensation upto standard values and power factor
improvement are the main issues for such loads. The power
factor PF is defined as the ratio of the active power P to the
apparent power S . Thus
S
P
PF  (1)
For purely sinusoidal voltage and current, the standard
expression is obtained as
cosPF (2)
Where cos is popularly known as the displacement factor.
The classical expression of the power factor does not apply for
non-sinusoidal current due to non-linear load. Hence, for
sinusoidal voltage and non-sinusoidal current, equation (1) can
be expressed as:
rmssrmss
rmssrmss
IV
IV
PF
,,
,1, cos

rmss
rmss
I
I
,
,1 cos

cospK (3)
The factor
rmss
rmss
p
I
I
K
,
,1
 is a measure of the harmonic content
of the current and is 1.0 at best when there is no harmonics.
Hence, PF depends on both the harmonic content and the
displacement factor ( cos ). pK is also related to the total
harmonic distortion ( iTHD ).
2
1
1
i
p
THD
K

 (4)
The total harmonic distortion is expressed as
rmss
n
rmssn
i
I
I
THD
,1
2
2
,


 (5)
Hence, in conventional ac supplies, power factor improvement
means compensation of the displacement factor. In a more
general sense, the improvement of the power factor (equation
(3)) to unity involves two issues:
(i) Improvement of fundamental power factor or displacement
factor: For example: (a) 0.1cos  for R -load linear and
0.1cos  for LR  and CR  load also linear. (b) For
diode rectifier load, 0.1cos  (assuming that DC load
current is continuous) and for an SCR (silicon controlled
rectifier),  coscos  where  is the triggering angle of
SCR. The fundamental power factor can be made unity by
reactive power compensation.
(ii) Presence of harmonics, increases true rms
][ 2
,
2
,1,  rmssnrmssrmss III and hence also increases the
system )( SVA  . Clearly, therefore, VAR is increased. But
rmss
rmss
I
I
,
,1
is unity always for R , LR  and CLR  loads in
conventional ac systems feeding linear loads, whereas,
rmss
rmss
I
I
,
,1
will never be unity for non-linear load unless
02
,  rmssnI . So, the only option is harmonic
compensation which is also known as active filtration. The
survey of the power factor for a year of the rural consumers is
given in Table.I and spectrum analysis of the supply current is
shown in Fig.2. Fig.2 shows the spectrum analysis of supply
current before compensation. The Total harmonic Distortion of
the supply current is 30.44%.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Fig.1: Linear and non-linear loads of consumers connected to
supply system
Table 1: It shows the power factor of the rural consumers
Period of the
Year
(Month)
Actual
KW
Demand
(KW)
Actual
KVA
Demand
(KVA)
Actual Power
Factor (%)
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
200
150
125
224
208
210
223
211
204
198
156
201
245
224
175
256
289
299
289
278
265
245
198
265
81.63%
66.69%
71.43%
87.50%
71.97%
70.23%
77.16%
75.90%
76.98%
80.82%
78.79%
75.85%
Fig.2: Spectrum analysis of supply current
Power electronic devices are gaining popularity for applications
in the field of power transmission and distribution systems. The
reactive power (VAR) compensation and control have been
recognized [8] as an efficient & economic means of increasing
power system transmission capability and stability.
The use FACTS (Flexible AC Transmission System) devices in
a power system can potentially overcome limitations of the
present mechanically controlled transmission systems. By
facilitating bulk power transfers, these interconnected networks
help minimize the need to enlarge power plants and enable
neighboring utilities and regions to exchange power. The
stature of FACTS devices within the bulk power system will
continually increase as the industry moves toward a more
competitive posture in which power is bought and sold as a
commodity. As power wheeling becomes increasingly
prevalent, power electronic devices will be utilized more
frequently to insure system reliability and stability and to
increase maximum power transmission along various
transmission corridors. The FACTS device, such as STATCOM
has been introduced more recently which employs a VSI with a
fixed DC link capacitor as a static replacement of the
synchronous condenser. In a traditional synchronous condenser,
the field current of the synchronous motor controls the amount
of VAR absorbed/injected and hence in a similar way, the firing
instant of the 3-phase inverter controls the VAR flow into or
out of the STATCOM. Large numbers of capacitor banks or
inductor banks are no more required. Only a fixed set of
capacitor provides the required VAR control, with a rapid
control of bus voltage and improvement of utility power factor.
It offers several advantages over conventional thyristorised
converters [9] in terms of speed of response. The STATCOM
is a voltage source inverter (VSI) based device, which regulates
distribution bus voltage using reactive power compensation.
The potential of STATCOM to improve supply quality and
increase line utilization in weak distribution networks is well
documented [10,11]. However, many of the proposed control
strategies assume a stiff, balanced grid source, and this is often
not the case in practice. Recently, there has been some research
focus on the performance of STATCOM devices operating
under unbalanced supply conditions. Direct voltage control
algorithms used to compensate for supply unbalance in
distribution networks were proposed in [12] and [13]. However,
the results in [13] show a relatively slow dynamic response
because of the filters employed. Also, both algorithms have
been developed for a VSI device interfaced to the distribution
network through a simple inductive filter, and have not been
tested for the more complex LCL filter considered in this work.
A multi-variable control strategy was proposed in [14] for a
STATCOM with a LCL filter interface. Although this strategy
is shown to achieve good steady state and dynamic responses
under balanced and unbalanced supply conditions, it is complex
and sensitive to variations in system parameters. The penalty
paid for this improvement is in terms of introduction of some
harmonics, which requires separate handling using active
filtration techniques. Moran et al [15] have shown in details

__________________________________________________________________________________________
how the utilization of Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation
(SPWM) techniques reduces harmonic distortion. It has also
been shown that an increase of modulation index reduces the
size of the link reactor and stress on switches which are
significant issues in practical implementation. The modeling
and analysis of STATCOM steady state and dynamic
performance with conventional control method have been
studied by Schauder and Mehta [16] using non-linear
controller. In [17, 18] the dynamic responses and steady state
behavior of STATCOM with Space Vector Pulse Width
Modulation (SVPWM) has been studied and the advantages of
introducing SVPWM inverter with higher values of modulation
index are highlighted.
The controllable reactive power allows for a rapid control of
bus voltage and power factor at the system or at the load end.
To compensate for the distorted current drawn by the rectifiers
from the utility grid, the STATCOM and its current controller
must have the capability to track source PWM (Pulse Width
Modulation) converters. The linear control is more suitable for
STATCOM application reported in [19, 20]. The present paper
suggests the design of a linear current controller and voltage
controller on the basis of gain and time constant adjustment
along with the parameter of the coupling inductor and storage
capacitor.
The present paper goes on to develop closed loop model for
investigating transient performance of the STATCOM by using
controller parameter. First, in Section 2 focuses on state space
model of the STATCOM with the system. Secondly, in Section
3, a current and voltage controllers are designed. The simulated
responses with the designed controller parameters are
presented. This scheme is both an extension and a significant
improvement of the scheme suggested by Shauder et al [16]
and Sensarma et al [11].The results obtained have been
compared and appropriate conclusions have been drawn.
2. MODELING OF THE STATCOM AND
ANALYSIS
2.1. Operating Principle
As is well known, the STATCOM is, in principle, a static
(power electronic) replacement of the age-old synchronous
condenser. Fig.3 shows the schematic diagram of the
STATCOM at PCC through coupling inductors. The
fundamental phasor diagram of the STATCOM terminal
voltage with the voltage at PCC for an inductive load in
operation, neglecting the harmonic content in the STATCOM
terminal voltage, is shown in Fig.4. Ideally, increasing the
amplitude of the STATCOM terminal voltage oaV

above the
amplitude of the utility voltage saV

causes leading (capacitive)
current caI

to be injected into the system at PCC as shown in
Fig.4.
2.2. Modeling
The modeling of the STATCOM, though well known, is
reviewed in the lines below, for the sake of convenience. The
modeling is carried out with the following assumptions:
1) All switches are ideal
2) The source voltages are balanced
3) sR represents the converter losses and the losses of the
coupling inductor
Fig.3: Schematic diagram of STATCOM
Fig.4: Phasor diagram for inductive load operation
4) The harmonic contents caused by switching action are
negligible
The 3-phase stationary abc coordinate vectors with 1200
apart
from each other are converted into  2-phase stationary
coordinates (which are in quadrature). The  axis is aligned
with a axis and leading  axis and both converted into
dq two-phase rotating coordinates. The Park’s abc to dq
transformation matrix is











2/12/12/1
)3/2()3/2()(
)3/2()3/2()(
3
2


tSintSintSin
tCostCostCos
K (6)
The actual proposed circuit is too complex to analyze as a
whole, so that it is partitioned into several basic sub-circuits, as
shown in Fig.3. The 3-phase system voltage abcsv , lagging with
the phase angle  to the STATCOM output voltage abcov , and

__________________________________________________________________________________________
differential form of the STATCOM currents are defined in (7)
and (8).
3
2
(
)
3
2
(
)(
3
2
,



































tSin
tSin
tSin
sV
scv
sbv
sav
abcs
v
(7)
  abcovabcsvabccisRabcci
dt
d
sL ,.,,,  (8)
Where, ss RV ,, and sL have their usual connotations. The
above voltages and currents are transformed into dq frame
  oqsqcdscqscqs vviwLiRi
dt
d
L  (9a)
  odsdcdscqscds vviRiwLi
dt
d
L  (9b)
The switching function S of the STATCOM can be defined as
follows
























)
3
2
(
)
3
2
(
)(
3
2


wtSin
wtSin
wtSin
m
cS
bS
aS
S
(10)
The modulation index, being constant for a programmed PWM,
is given by,
m
dcV
peakov
MI
3
2,
 (11)
The STATCOM output voltages in dq transformation are
  dcv
T
mqdoov 010,  (12)
The dc side current in the capacitor in dq transformation
 
T
co
i
cd
i
cq
im
dc
i



 010 (13)
The voltage and current related in the dc side is given by
cd
dc
i
C
m
dt
dv
 (14)
The complete mathematical model of the STATCOM in dq
frame is obtained as given in (15)




















































0
00
0


Cos
Sin
L
V
v
i
i
C
m
L
m
L
R
w
w
L
R
v
i
i
dt
d
s
s
dc
cd
cq
ss
s
s
s
dc
cd
cq
(15)
2.3. Steady State and Transient Analysis
The detailed steady state and transient responses with the
Table.II are given in Fig.5-8 and responses suggest the static
and dynamic conditions of the STATCOM. It can be seen that
the transient responses take about one and half power cycle to
reach at their steady state values.
Table 2: It shows the system parameters
Sl Parameters Symbol Values
1 Frequency f 50 Hz
2 Angular Frequency w 314 rad/sec
3 RMS line-to-line
Voltage
sV 230V
4 Coupling Resistance
sR 1.0 
5 Coupling Inductance
sL 5.0mH
6 DC-link capacitor C 500 F
7 Modulation Index M 0.979
8 Phase angle  0
5
9 Load Resistance
LR 52
10 Load Inductance
LL mH126
11 Load Power factor  79.0
(a) (b)

__________________________________________________________________________________________
(c) (d)
Fig.5: Responses: (a) steady state of cqI , cdI and dcV , (b)
steady state of cP and cQ ,(c) transient of cqi in capacitive and
inductive and (d) transient of dcv in capacitive and inductive
3. DESIGN OF CONTROLLERS:




















































od
v
oq
v
sd
v
sq
v
sLcdi
cqi
sL
sR
sL
sR
cdi
cqi
dt
d 1




(16)
With the assumption of the system voltage and STATCOM
output voltage are in phase and hence the equation (15) can be
modified as given in equation (16). So the equation (16) is a
Multiple Input and Multiple Output (MIMO) system and its
input and output are given as
    












cd
cq
od
oq
i
i
y
v
v
u ,
(17)
The block diagram of the STATCOM in d-q transformation as
per (16) is shown in Fig.6.The instantaneous voltage of the
system and the STATCOM are independent, but the active and
the reactive currents are coupled with each other through the
reactance of the coupled inductor. So it is very essential to
decouple the active and reactive current from each other and
design the controller for tracking the required value.
Fig.6: Equivalent Diagram on a.c.side of STATCOM
3.1. Design of Current Controller:
The current controller design for the above system can be done
using the strategy [15-16] attempts to decouple the d and q axes
equations, so that the MIMO system reduces to two
independent Single Input Single Output (SISO) system. Hence,
the control inputs odv and oqv are configured as
sdvcdiswLodvodv
sqvcqiswLoqvoqv


*
*
(18)
The equation (19) can be obtained by replacing (16) by (18).
Hence each row of (19) is independent of each other and thus
defines an independent SISO system. Conventional frequency-
domain design methods can now be directly applied for current
controller. Taking the Laplace transformation of both sides of
(19) and rearranging terms are given by (20) and their
decoupled SISO system is shown in Fig.7.






































*
*
1
0
0
od
v
oq
v
sLcdi
cqi
sL
sR
sL
sR
cdi
cqi


(19)
ssLsRsodV
sdI
sdG
ssLsRsoqV
sqI
sqG




1
)(
*
)(
)(,
1
)(
*
)(
)( (20)
Fig.7: Current control of inverter of equivalent decoupled SISO
systems
For similar dynamic behaviour of the d and q - axis currents,
both the d and q - axis controllers are identical and its transfer
function is given in (21)
ssLsRsodV
scdI
soqV
scqI
s
i
G


1
)(
*
)(
)(
*
)(
)( (21)

__________________________________________________________________________________________
The transfer function of a PI controller is
s
i
K
pK
i
s
KspiG 









1
1)( (22)
With
i
K
iKKpK

 , . The transfer function in open loop of
PI controller associated with the transfer function on the a.c.
system is
 




















sR
sL
s
sR
i
s
Ks
i
GspiG
1
1
1
1)().(

(23)
While taking
sR
sL
i
 and on simplification reduces to
  ssL
K
s
i
GspiG )().( (24)
The closed loop transfer function is
K
sL
s
T


1
1
(25)
Thus the system behaves like a first order with an apparent time
constant as
K
Ls
i  (26)
The gain of K can be adjusted such a way that if it is increased
too high then the system behaves as second order, otherwise
responses very slow. Hence the numerical values for
pK and iK are decided from the circuit parameters sL and sR
from the required value of K. So the parameters of PI controller
are defined as
sL
sKR
iKKpK  , (27)
Where,
p
s
i
K
L
 which is taken as 0.3mseconds and with the
parameters given in Table-II, value of 9.16piK and
3
103.3 iiK are calculated. These parameters are used
in d and q - axis current controller. The structure of the
effective closed loop system is shown in Fig.8 and is replicated
in both the d and q - axis current controllers. Bode plot of the
system with controller is shown in Fig.9, which is a first order
system.
Fig.8: Effective closed loop current control system
3.2. Design of Voltage Controller:
The relation between dc voltage
dc
v and dc current dci is
dtdci
Cdcv 
1
(28)
The transfer function can be written as
sCdcI
dcV
svG
1
)(  (29)
Fig.9: Bode plot of the system with PI controller
Neglecting the power loss in the source resistance and power
losses in the switches, balancing the power on both sides,
dcdccdsd iviv  (30)
From the above equation, we have
46.0
500
230

dc
s
dc
sd
cd
dc
V
V
v
v
i
i
(31)

__________________________________________________________________________________________
With dcV as the reference, the voltage control loop is shown in
Fig.10 and it consists of inner d - axis current control loop.
The active power is supplied by the d -axis current which is
nothing but the ripple current of the capacitor. To make the
steady state error of the voltage loop zero Proportional control
is adopted here and it produces the reference d -axis current
for the control of the d -axis current. The design of voltage
controller is as follows:
The open loop transfer function of DC bus voltage controller is
sC
KK
G dc
op
*
 (32)
The closed loop transfer function with unity feed back gain is
dc
cl
KK
sC
G
*
1
1

 (33)
Where,
dc
v
KK
C
*
 and taking v 1msecond and with the
parameters of Table. I, the value of 08.1dcK
Fig.10: DC link voltage control loop
Then Proportional Integral controller is considering for the
voltage control. Hence, the transfer function of PI controller in
(22) is associated with the transfer function on dc side is
  














sC
v
s
K
ol
spiGsvG
11
1)().(

(34)
After taking Cv  and on simplification
  




 
 22
1
)().(
v
v
olpiv
s
s
KsGsG


(35)
The transfer function in closed loop
 















K
s
s
s
sGsG
v
v
v
clpiv 22
1
1
)().(



(36)
So the system behaves like a second order system. As
K
v
v
2

  and magnitude plot in Fig.9 shows the initial slop at
break point is approximately –20db/decade and hence it
reduces to first order system. The value of K can be determined
form root locus with approximate settling time as given in (37)
and implementation block diagram is shown in Fig.14.
200,15.0 
C
K
viKKpvK (37)
The control loop shown in Fig.11 It is interesting to note that
the controllers designed for linear loads are found to be capable
of working with non-linear load too with minor but essential
modifications. The only change is the inclusion of a stage of the
high pass filter (HPF) used before the d -axis controller. Here
also three different PI-controllers are needed to control q -axis
current, cqi , d -axis current , cdi , and the DC-link voltage,
dcv . The reference input for the cdi controller is generated
from the sum of the output of the DC-link voltage controller
and the high frequency components of the load current. The
adopted scheme is a usual one and also used in the industry.
Fig.11: Implementing scheme
4. SIMULATION RESULTS:
The simulated plots of the grid sav and sai (when STATCOM
is off) are shown in Fig.12 (current magnitude of 3.504A (rms),
as sensor multiplying factor is 10) respectively. It shows
rectangular shape of the current waveform of the diode rectifier

__________________________________________________________________________________________
without capacitor at the DC output voltage. It is easy to see that
the harmonics are reasonably reduced. It is very interesting to
note that when STATCOM is on the simulated responses of the
grid sav and sai (harmonics eliminated and var compensated
which improves power factor) are in full agreement with each
other (shown in Fig.13). The harmonic spectrum of the grid
sai (rectifier load phase-a current) in simulation are plotted in
Fig.14 (a). It depicts that both the plots compare remarkably
well (as simulation shows that iTHD .of the grid sai (load
current) is 31.07%). There is a close agreement of iTHD of the
grid sai in simulation (where %05.12iTHD ) as plotted in
Fig.14 (b).
Fig.12: Simulated traces of the sav and sai (for 3.506) when
the STATCOM is off condition (for 3.504A as sensor
multiplying factor 10)
Fig.13: Simulated records of the sav and sai (for 3.506A) when
the STATCOM is on
(a)
(b)
Fig.14: (a) Simulated waveforms of harmonic spectrum of sai
when the STATCOM is switched off ( %07.31iTHD ), and
(b) simulated at the STATCOM is on ( %05.12iTHD )
CONCLUSIONS
The investigations of the performance of the STATCOM for
the harmonic reduction with non-linear loads have been carried
out. With proposed model catering non-linear loads have been
performed very well. The STATCOM works as an active filter.
The simulated waveforms confirm the validity of the control
strategy. It has also been shown that the interaction between a
STATCOM device and a supply system makes the rural
consumers healthy and wealthy.
REFERENCES
[1] J.-C. Wu, H.-L. Jou, and Y.-T. Feng, “Novel circuit
topology for three-phase active Power filter,” IEEE
Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 444–449, Jan
2007 .
[2] M. H. Abdel-Rahman, F. M. H. Youssef, and A.A.
Saber, “New static var compensator control strategy
and coordination with under-load tap changer,” IEEE
Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 3, pp.1630–1635 Jul.
2006.
[3] C.K.Duffey and R.P.Stratford, "Update of Harmonic
Standard IEEE-5 19: Recommended Practices and
Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power
Supply Systems." IEEE Trans.IAS,pp. 1025-1034,
Nov/Dec. 1989.
[4] S Z. Shuai, A. Luo, R. Fan et al, “Injection branch
design of injection type hybrid active power filter,”
Autom. Elect. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 57–
60,Jun. 2007
[5] An Luo, Zhikang Shuai, Wenji Zhu, and Z. John
Shen,” Combined System for Harmonic Suppression
and Reactive Power Compensation” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 56,
no.2,February 2009.
[6] Z. Chengyong, L. Xiangdong, and L.
Guangkai,“Parameters Optimization of VSC-HVDC
control system based on simplex algorithm,” in Proc.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
IEEE Power Eng. Soc. General Meeting, 2007, pp. 1–
7.
[7] K.-K. Shyu, M.-J. Yang, Y.-M. Chen, and Y.-
F.Lin,“Model reference adaptive control design for a
shunt active-power-filter system,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 97–106, Jan. 2008
[8] A.T. Johns, A.Ter-Gazarian and D.F.Wame,”Flexible
ac transmission systems (FACTS)”, IEE Power and
Energy Series, London, U.K.
[9] R.M.Mathur and R.K. Varma, “Thyristors-based
FACTS Controllers for Electrical Transmission
Systems, IEEE Press”, Wiley-Interscience Publication.
[10] Z. Saad-Saoud, M. L. Li:jboa, J. B. Ekanayake, N.
Jenkins, and G. Strbac, "Application of STATCOMs
to wind farms," IEE Proceedings. Generation,
Transmission & Distribution, vol. 145, pp. 51 1-518,
1998
[11] P. S. Sensarma, K. R. Pa.diayar and V.
Ramanarayanan, "Analysis and Performance
Evaluation of a Distribution STATCOM for
Compensating Voltage Fluctuations," IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery, vol 16. no. 2, April
200 I .
[12] C. Hochgrnf and R. H. Lasseter, "Statcom controls for
Operation with Unbalanced Voltages", IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery. vol. 13, no. 2, April
1998.
[13] S. Chen, G. Joos and L. T. Moran, "Dynamic
Performance of PWM STATCOMs Operating under
Unbalance and Fault Conditions in Distribution
Systems", in Proc. of IEEE Power Engineering Socieg
WififterM eeting, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 950-955.
[14] G. Ledwich and A. Ghosh, "A flexible DSTATCOM
operating in voltage or current control mode", IEE
Proc.-Gener. Trunsm.Distrbi., vol. 149, no. 2, March
2002.
[15] L.T. Moran, P.D.Ziogas and G.Joos, “Analysis and
Design of a Three-Phase Synchronous Solid- State
Var Compansator”, IEEE Trans. Industry Application,
Vol. 25, No. 4, 1989, pp. 598-608.
[16] C.Shauder and H.Mehta, “Vector analysis and control
of advanced static VAR compensators”, IEE Proc,
140, No. 4, July 1993.
[17] Draou, M. Benghanem and A. Tahiri, “Multilevel
Converter and VAR Compensation”, Power
Electronics Handbook”, pp.599-611, Academic Press,
2001.
[18] M.Sengupta,J.K Moharana and A.Sengupta,“ Study on
an Advanced Static VAR Compensator switched
from a Space Vector PWM inverter –Analysis,
simulation and comparison with the conventional
sinusoidal PWM, NPEC 2003, IIT Bombay,16-17 Oct
03 pp 72-78.
[19] D.M.Brod and D.W.Novotny, “Current control of
VSI- PWM inverter ”IEEE Trans.Industrial Appl,
Vol.IA-21, pp.562- 570, July/Aug.1985.S.Buso,
L.Malesani and P.Mattavelli, “Comparison of Current
Control Techniques for Active Filter Application
”IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, Vol.45, No.5,
pp.722-729, October 1998.
[20] A.M. Kulkarni and K.R. Padiyara, “Design of
Reactive Current and Voltage Controllers of Static
Condenser”, Power and Energy System, Vol.19, No.6,
pp.397-410, 1997.

Power quality improvement in a weak bus system using facts controller

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Power quality improvement in a weak bus system using facts controller (20)

More from eSAT Journals (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Power quality improvement in a weak bus system using facts controller