PREDOMINANCE OF BLOWFISH OVER TRIPLE DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD SYMMETRIC KEY ALGORITHM FOR SECURE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING VERILOG HDL

International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA) Vol.9, No.6, November 2017
DOI: 10.5121/ijnsa.2017.9603 29
PREDOMINANCE OF BLOWFISH OVER TRIPLE DATA
ENCRYPTION STANDARD SYMMETRIC KEY
ALGORITHM FOR SECURE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
USING VERILOG HDL
V. Kumara Swamy1
Prabhu Benakop2
1
Dept of ECE, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology,Yamnampet, Ghatkesar,
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2
Dept of ECE, Indur Institute of Engineering and Technology, Siddipet Dist, Telangana,
India
ABSTRACT
Computer data communication is the order of the day with Information Communication Technology (ICT)
playing major role in everyone’s life, communicating with smart phones, tabs, laptops and desktops using
internet. Security of the data transferred over the computer networks is most important as for as an
organization is concerned. Hackers attempt hard to crack the software key and indulge in cyber crimes. In
this paper, the main concern is not only to provide security to the data transferred at the software level but
it provides the security at hardware level by the modified Blowfish Encryption and Decryption Algorithms.
It results minimum delay, high speed, high throughput] and effective memory utilization compared to
Blowfish (BF) and Triple Data Encryption Standard (TDES) algorithms. The implementation of Blowfish
with modulo adder and Wave Dynamic Differential Logic (WDDL) is to provide security against
Differential power analysis (DPA). In the proposed four implementations, BF with constant delay n-bit
adder (BFCDNBA) yielded minimum delay, maximum frequency, high memory utilization and high
throughput compared to BF with modulo adder and WDDL logic (BFMAWDDL), BF with modulo adder
(BFMA) and TDES algorithms. The VLSI implementation of Blowfish and TDES algorithms is done using
Verilog HDL.
KEYWORDS:
BF, TDES, WDDL, DPA, BFMA, BFCDNBA, BFMAWDDL, HDL.
1. INTRODUCTION
Many encryption algorithms have come into an existence for information confidentiality,
authenticity, integrity, non repudiation and access control such as DES, TDES, Advanced
Encryption Standard ( AES) and Blowfish [4, 10] etc. This research work analyzes the merits and
demerits of Blowfish compared to TDES algorithm in terms of their operation, propagation delay,
memory utilization and throughput of the algorithms considered. The brief information about
following algorithms is explained below:
1.1. DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD (DES)
Data Encryption Standard encrypts 64-bit block plain text with 56- bits key length. It is a fiestel
network. After initial permutations, it undergoes 16- rounds of processing steps. It can operate in
Cipher Block Chaining (CBC), Electronic Code Book (ECB), Cipher Feedback (CFB) and Output
Feedback (OFB) modes [10] [12]. It is prone to Brute Force attack in which hacker attempts to
break the key by applying all possible combinations of inputs. It’s a popular and most widely
used algorithm before TDES, AES, and BF algorithms. It’s an insecure algorithm [23] [10]

30
1.2. TRIPLE DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD (TDES)
It is also known as Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) which is triplication of Data
Encryption Standard (3DES) applied to every 64-bits data block, came into an existence to
overcome the brute force attacks commonly suffered by DES algorithm. It has 48 rounds of
operations. In this method, three keying options are there:
• Three keys k1,k2 and k3 are independent
• Keys k1 and k2 are independent and k3 = k1.
• All three keys are equal, i.e., k1= k2 =k3.
Thus option-1 is the strongest among all three. It has 168 bits of independent key bits where as
option-2 has 112 key bits which are moderately secured compared to the option-1. The last option
is having 56 key bits as same as DES but used thrice in the algorithm because of all three keys are
equal and prediction can be done easily. It is a symmetric key block cipher [16]. It is less secured
than AES.
1.3. ADVANCED ENCRYPTION STANDARD (AES)
AES is a block cipher with variable key length. The block length is 128 bits and key length may
be 128/192/256 bits with 9/11/13 rounds respectively. Each processing round consists of four
steps, i.e., substitute bytes, shift rows, mix columns and add round key. AES encryption is
flexible, more secured and fast [14] [20] [16]. It is a popular and secured encryption algorithm in
the industry compared to DES [9] [12], but it is prone to side channel attacks.
1.4. BLOW-FISH (BF)
Blowfish is a symmetric block cipher with variable key length. The plain text is in 64-bit blocks
but the key length varies from 32 to 448 bits. The data encryption occurs through 16-round fiestel
network. Each round consists of plain text and key dependent operations such as XOR, ADD
AND SUBSTITUTE etc. It’s faster than TDES and AES [15] [17]. It’s a replacement for DES
algorithm [16] [4] [10]. Blowfish algorithm is used more than AES due to its large key length and
high security. It provides high throughput compared to other algorithms considered in this
research work [18, 21]
1.5. RELATED RESEARCH REVIEW
Literature review reveals that Blowfish Algorithm implemented using Verilog HDL gave better
results in terms of reduced delay and increased throughput. To mention a few, the jest of few
papers referred is given below:
Performance of blowfish algorithm based on field programmable gate array (FPGA) is analyzed
in terms of speed, rate of encrypting the given data and power. Results indicate that the proposed
Blowfish algorithm reduced delay and increases throughput with low power consumption
compared to AES. This paper focused on small high-speed security architectures and systems
with low power consumption for mobile devices [1].
The amalgamation algorithm consists of both Blowfish and Rivest Cipher 6 (RC6) to solve the
security problems and maintains the efficiency. It provides faster data transfer and high security,
both are very important for Wi-Fi applications. The collision attack problem is eliminated using
S-Box overlapping process and Brute Force attack is eliminated using Sub key generation
process. It decreases delay time and frequency [2].
Cloud computing needs secure, fast and area efficient cryptographic techniques. Blowfish
cryptosystem is one of the strong and fast algorithms used for cryptography. It uses hybrid
algorithm consists of RSA and blowfish algorithms and implemented using VHDL. It has

31
symmetric and asymmetric properties. Thus, it is more useful for cloud computing applications
[3]
Various range application of blowfish algorithm can be implemented for data encryption sent
from an Internet of Things physical network which has IP-based data. Performance metrics are
analyzed such as Security, Complexity, propagation delay, and throughput of Blowfish
Algorithm. Hardware implementation of blowfish algorithm on FPGA using VHDL which
yielded reduced propagation delay and enhanced throughput [6, 18]
Conjugate- structure algebraic CELP coding method is used in speech encryption using Blowfish
algorithm. A new method for generating S-boxes and P-arrays which are the main building blocks
of the Blowfish algorithm is proposed which reduces time, complexity and provides more
security [8].
Performance of symmetric encryption algorithms on power consumption for wireless devices is
studied and analyzed to have less battery power consumption. The algorithms considered are
DES, 3DES, AES, Blowfish, Rivest Cipher2 (RC2), and RC6. Energy efficiency is the main
focus of this design [15, 19].
Blowfish has better performance than other commonly used encryption algorithms. Blowfish can
be considered as an excellent standard encryption algorithm than AES. AES requires more
processing power and more processing time than Blowfish algorithm [20].
Performance analysis of DES and Blowfish is done for wireless networks to provide security to
the information. It presented about security, speed and power consumption. Results confirm that
Blowfish algorithm runs faster than DES but power consumption is almost same even though
blowfish has 448-bit key length and more number of iterations/operations [23].
2. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF BLOW-FISH ALGORITHM
Blowfish is a block cipher; encryption and decryption is performed in the block sizes of 64-bits. It
is a 16-round fiestel network and symmetric algorithm. The plain text of 64-bits separated as two
halves, 32 bit each (LE and RE). We perform 16-rounds of operations during encryption and
decryption processes as shown in equation 1 and 2 respectively which involve XOR, Fiestel
function (F), XOR and SWAP LE and RE operations in each round as shown in flowchart fig
no.1. Fiestel function (F) involves XOR and modulo addition operation [7] [11].
The Encryption operation equation is given below in equation (1).
The Decryption operation equation is given below in equation (2).

32
The flowchart depicts Encryption process of converting plaintext in to Cypher text as shown
below
Fig.1.0: Encryption Process Flowchart
Fig. 1.0 indicates the complete process of LE and RE generations in every round of operation
which includes XOR, Fiestel Function (F) and Swapping operation. Every round is supported by
P-array elements.. After completion of 16-rounds of operations, LE16 and RE16 are XORed with
P17 and P18 to generate RE17 and LE17. LE17 and RE17 are concatenated to get the 64-bit Cyphertext
as an output. Reverse operation is performed in the decryption process.
3. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF PROPOSED BLOWFISH ALGORITHM
Fig.2.0: Top level Design module of Blowfish Algorithm
As shown in fig.2.0 above, Blowfish algorithm [5, 13] is divided in to two parts: Encryption &
Decryption unit for data processing and Sub-key generation Unit for generation of sub-keys to be
used in each round of operation. In the data encryption and Decryption block, input 64-bit data
block is divided in to two halves as 32-bit Left Encryption (LE) and 32-bit Right Encryption
(RE). In each round of operation, the algorithm will perform RE and LE operations as shown in
equation (1) for encryption and equation (2) for Decryption which is also shown in fig.1.0 for
Encryption process. The Fiestel function (F) in each round consists of combination of
substitution, addition/modulo addition, XOR and addition/modulo addition operations. Thus, the
algorithm follows the procedure for 16-rounds. RE16 and LE16 are XORed with P17 and P18
respectively to generate RE17 and LE17. Reverse operation is performed for the decryption
operation [7] [11] [22].

33
The sub-key generation unit is to generate 18- sub-keys (P-Array) from 448-bit input key, i.e., K-
array has 14 input sub-keys of 32-bit each, can be used in generating P-Array of P1 to P18 initial
sub-keys as shown in fig.2.0, each one is 32-bit in width which is updated as per the following
equations (3):
P1=P1^K1, P2=P2 ^K2…P14=P14^K14,
P15=P15^K1, P16=P16 ^K2,
P17=P17^K3, P18=P18 ^K4; (3)
Where K1 to K14 (32-bits each) are generated from 448-bit input key.
3.1. MODULO- M-BIT ADDER:
In the encryption or decryption operation, modulo-addition operation [24] with and without
WDDL logic is shown in fig.3.0. For increasing the speed of series adders in this figure can be
operated in parallel. one adder adds Two h-bit residues, X and Y to form their sum
S1+2h
Cout1.Another one is 3-operand adder that computes “X+Y+m”. Note that if m=2n
+1, we
have h=n+1.It has been reported that if either Cout1 or Cout2 of this addition is ‘1’ then the
output is X+Y+m instead of X+Y. However, in the following we illustrate that only if the carry of
“X+Y+m” is ‘1’, it is sufficient to select it as the final output.
Fig.3.0: Modulo M –bit adder
3.2. CONSTANT DELAY N-BIT ADDER:
Constant Delay n-bit adder is adder is used to perform two array addition operations as shown in
fig.4.0. The main advantage of this adder is irrespective of input the delay is constant so it’s
called Constant Delay n-bit adder.
Fig.4.0: Constant Delay n-Bit Adder

34
The constant delay n-bit adder consists of three n-bit XOR gates, two n-bit AND gates, one n-bit
OR gate. In this the input arrays are Xored in XOR n-bit gate and AND operation is performed in
AND n-bit gate. The Output of AND n-bit gate is performed left shift operation and the resulted
value XORed with output of XOR n-bit gate and AND operation with AND n-bit gate. Again the
Output of AND gate is performed left shift operation and the resulted value XORed with output
of present XOR n-bit gate. The output of XOR n-bit adder is declared as sum of constant delay n-
bit adder. The MSB bit of each AND n-bit gate output before shift, is performed OR operation
with OR gate and output is declared as carry bit output.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The implementation of Blowfish Algorithm is done in three methods which are compared with
Triple DES Algorithm. The implementation of the design followed bottom up approach. The test
bench is written in Verilog HDL for every module of the design to provide 100% code coverage
of the design. Top level Test Bench (TB) of the design is instantiated with top module of the
design which consists of all the sub modules instantiated in it. Test cases are generated, applied to
the Design Under Test (DUT) and results are generated for further verification of functionality,
Delay estimation, frequency of the design and Throughput calculation. Mentor Graphics
ModelSim is used for simulation. Xilinx ISE Design Suite14.2 is used to implement the design on
Altera 6.3g_p1 (Quartus II 8.1). The synthesis tool Xilinx ISE 14.2 generated the RTL circuit,
Memory Utilization, Propagation delay and even the percentage of area utilized by the design.
The Comparison of the four implementations is given in the table.1. This paper compares delay,
frequency, memory utilization and throughput of the four implementations listed in the table. 1.
Table.1 Comparison Of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA And Triple DES Implementations
S
NO
Crypto processor algo/parameter Delay (ns) Freq(10KHz) Memory
Utilization (Mb)
Throughput
(Mbps)
1 Triple DES 197.241 506 294.74 320
2 BF with modulo adder and WDDL
logic (BFMAWDDL)
112.566 888.4 469.384 570
3 BF with modulo adder (BFMA) 99.395 1006 460.808 640
4 BF with constant delay n-bit adder and
WDDL Logic (BFCDNBA)
76.337 1309 520.584 840
In the delay comparison shown in fig.5.0, Blowfish with constant delay n-bit adder and WDDL
logic implementation produces constant delay irrespective of number of stages of adders in the
parallel adder design. Constant delay adder makes lot of difference in hardware implementation
compared to modulo adder with and without WDDL gates. Hence, it resulted in lowest delay
(76.337ns) compared to other implantations.
Fig.5.0: Delay comparison of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA and Triple DES implementations
As the delay is less for Blowfish with constant delay n-bit adder and WDDL logic because of
parallelism in implementing the hardware design,the frequency is more (13.09MHz) for

35
BFCDNBA implementation compared to TDES, Blowfish with modulo adder implementations as
shown below in fig.6.0. As the frequency of design is high which can convert plaintext to
ciphertext at faster rate. Triple DES , Blowfish with modulo adder with and without WDDL logic
implementations are more of sequential implementations. Hence, they are slow. Critical path
delay is reduced with effective implementation and thus the frequency is improved for constant
delay n-bit adder approach.
Fig.6.0: Frequency comparison of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA and Triple DES implementations
As per fig.7.0 shown below, the memory utilization of BFCDNBA is more (520.584Mb) because
more of parallelism in implementing the hardware design, data related to more number of
operations and more iterations are to be stored than other implementations for high speed of
Encryption and Decryption processes. S-Boxes are also called as Look Up Tables (LUTs)
contains large number of data items to be stored in for future substitutions. Intermediate P-array
keys are also requires more memory utility to generate sub-keys for every round of encryption
and decryption operations.
Fig.7.0: Memory Utilization comparison of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA and Triple DES
implementations
Throughput is defined as the ratio of number of bits Encrypted/Decrypted to the time taken by the
algorithm. As per the results obtained shown in fig.8.0, BFCDNBA implementation yielded best
throughput (840Mbps) compared to other implementations considered. As explained with respect
to fig.5.0, the delay is very less in BFCDNBA implementation compared to other
implementations considered in this research work. Hence throughput is very good in the
BFCDNBA implementation.

36
Fig.8.0: Throughput comparison of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA and Triple DES implementations
As shown in fig. 9.0, delay of the Blowfish with constant delay n-bit adder and WDDL logic
implementation is less and thus throughput of the same is more than the other implementations
considered in this research paper. Even though the number of bits of the adder is increasing, the
delay is constant and thus the throughput is increased with this approach.
Fig.9.0: Delay and Throughput comparison of BFMAWDDL, BFMA, BFCDNBA and Triple DES
implementations
5. CONCLUSIONS
As discussed in the results and discussion that BFCDNBA implementation gave better results
compared to other implementations. Constant delay n-bit adder circuit used in the Blowfish
Algorithm which reduced the delay to 76.337ns, increased frequency to 13.09MHz and thus
increased throughput to 840Mbps compared to BFMAWDDL, BFMA and Triple DES
implementations. It is providing more security because of 448 bit key length and incorporating
WDDL logic in the Encryption and Decryption process of Crypto-processor digital design flow.
However, the memory utilization is more (520.584Mb) for BFCDNBA implementation compared
to other implementations considered in this research paper because of its complexity, more
number of iterations/operations and more key length to provide at most security to the plaintext.
Blowfish algorithm is developed in Verilog HDL and implemented it on ModelSim-Altera
6.3g_p1 (Quartus II 8.1) Web Edition and Xilinx ISE Design Suite14.2. This was run on a
Windows 7 Home Basic (64-bit) Operating System, Intel® Core(TM) i3-2350M Processor @
2.30 GHz clock rate with an internal Memory of 4 GB and 500 GB Hard Disk.
Future scope of this research work is to decrease the delay, improve the frequency and yielding
better throughput compared to BFCDNBA implementation. This research work is also expected
extend it analysis to compare the area utilization of the crypto algorithms considered in this
design.

37
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author would like to thank Dr. Prabhu Benakop for his continuous guidance and support to
carry out this research work and present it in a systematic way.
REFERENCES:
[1] Rafidah Ahmad, AsrulnizamAbd. Manaf, "Development of an Improved Power-Throughput Blowfish
Algorithm on FPGA", 2016 IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its
Applications (CSPA),Vol 12, 06 March 2016.
[2] Nusrat Jahan Oishi, Arafin Mahamud, Asaduzzaman, "Enhancing Wi-Fi Security Using a Hybrid
Algorithm of Blowfish and RC6",2016 International Conference on Networking Systems and Security
(NSysS), 7-9 Jan, 2016..
[3] Viney Pal Bansal,Sandeep Singh, "A Hybrid Data Encryption Technique using RSA and Blowfish for
Cloud Computing on FPGAs", 2015 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in
Engineering & Computational Sciences (RAECS), 21-22 Dec. 2015
[4] Ashraf Odeh, Shadi R.Masadeh, Ahmad Azzazi, “A Performance Evaluation of Common Encryption
Techniques with Secure Watermark System (SWS)”, International Journal of Network Security & Its
Applications (IJNSA), Vol.7, No.3, May 2015, DOI : 10.5121/ijnsa.2015.7303
[5] Vaibhav Poonia, Dr.Narendra Singh Yadav, "Analysis of modified Blowfish Algorithm in different
cases with various parameters", International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science
Volume 3, Issue 1, January-February, 2015 ISSN 2091-2730.
[6] Kurniawan Nur Prasetyo, YudhaPurwanto, Denny Darlis, "An implementation of data encryption for
internet of things using Blowfish algorithm based on FPGA", Vol 2, 2014.
[7] V .Kumara Swamy, Dr Prabhu G Benakop, “High Throughput and High Speed Blowfish Algorithm
for Secure Integrated Circuits”, Ana le. Seria Informatică. Vol. XII fasc. 1 – 2014, Annals. Computer
Science Series. 12th Tome 1st Fasc. – 2014
[8] Amaal A. Abd El-Sadek, Talaat A. El-Garf, Mohammed M.Fouad, "Speech Encryption Applying a
Modified Blowfish Algorithm", October 2014.
[9] Meenakshi Shankar, Akshaya.P, “Hybrid Cryptographic Technique using RSA Algorithm and
Scheduling Concepts”, International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA) Vol.6,
No.6, November 2014, DOI : 10.5121/ijnsa.2014.6604.
[10] Ranjeet Masram, Vivek Shahare, Jibi Abraham, Rajni Moona,” Analysis and Comparison of
Symmetric Key Cryptographic Algorithms based on various file features”, International Journal of
Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.6, No.4, July 2014, DOI :
10.5121/ijnsa.2014.6404.
[11] V .Kumara Swamy, Dr Prabhu G Benakop, “Performance Analysis of Secure Integrated Circuits
using Blowfish Algorithm”, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Network, Web &
Security, Volume 13, Issue 17, Version 1.0,Page no.10-15, December 2013, Global Journals Inc
(USA), Online ISSN. 0975-4172, Print ISSN.0975-4350.
[12] Kuo-Tsang Huang , Jung-Hui Chiu1 and Sung-Shiou Shen, “A Novel Structure with Dynamic
Operation Mode for Symmetric-Key Block Ciphers”, International Journal of Network Security & Its
Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.1, January 2013, DOI : 10.5121/ijnsa.2013.5102
[13] Monika Agrawal, Pradeep Mishra, “A Modified Approach for Symmetric Key Cryptography Based
on Blowfish Algorithm”, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)
ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-1, Issue-6, August 2012.
[14] M.Chandra Mohan, V.Kumara Swamy, Dr. T.Srinivasulu, “Design of High Speed AES Algorithm”,
International Conference on Electronics and Communication Engineering (ICECE-2012),GNIT,
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 19-20,July 2012

38
[15] Monika Agrawal, Pradeep Mishra, ‘A Comparative Survey on Symmetric Key Encryption
Techniques’, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), ISSN : 0975-3397,
Vol. 4, No. 05, pp.877, May 2012
[16] Gurjeevan Singh, Ashwani Kr. Singla, K.S. Sandha, “Superiority of Blowfish Algorithm in Wireless
Networks”, International Journal of Computer Applications, ISSN: 09758887, Volume 44– No11,
April 2012
[17] Walied W. Souror, Ali E. Taki el-deen, Rasheed Mokhtar-awady Ahmed, Adel Zaghlul Mahmoud -
An Implementation of High Security and High Throughput Triple Blowfish Cryptography Algorithm,
International Journal of Research and Reviews in Signal Acquisition and Processing (IJRRSAP) Vol.
2, No. 1, March 2012, ISSN: 2046-617X.
[18] Gurjeevan Singh, Ashwani Kumar Singla, K. S. Sandha - Through Put Analysis of Various
Encryption Algorithms, IJCST Vol.2, Issue3, September 2011.
[19] Diaa Salama, Hatem Abdual Kader and Mohiy Hadhoud (2011), “Studying the Effects of Most
Common Encryption Algorithms”, International Arab Journal of e-Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, January
2011, pp 1-10.
[20] SimarPreet Singh, and Raman Maini (2011), “Comparison of Data Encryption Algorithms”,
International Journal of Computer Science and Communication Vol. 2, No. 1, January-June 2011, pp.
125-127.
[21] A.Rathika, Parvathy Nair and Parvathy Nair (2011), “A High Throughput Algorithm for Data
Encryption” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 13, No.5, January
2011 pp 13-16.
[22] V.Kumara Swamy, Dr Prabhu G Benakop and P.Sandeep, “Implementation of a digital design flow
for DPA secure WDDL Cryptoprocessor using Blowfish Algorithm”, Libyan Arab International
Conference on Electrical and Electronic Engineering(LAICEEE-2010), Tripoli, Libya, October 23-26,
2010, pp.565-73
[23] Tingyuan Nie, Chuanwang Songa and Xulong Zhi (2010), “Performance Evaluation of DES and
Blowfish Algorithms”, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Biomedical
Engineering and Computer Science (ICBECS- 2010), 23-25 Apr 2010. pp 1-4.
[24] Somayeh Timarchi, Keivan Navi - Improved Modulo 2n +1 Adder Design, International Journal of
Computer and Information Engineering 2:7 2008.
AUTHORS BIBLIOGRAPHY:
V. Kumara Swamy completed his B.E (ECE) in1998 from Osmania University,
Hyderabad and his M.Tech (DSCE) in 2005 from JNTUH, Hyderabad and pursuing
PhD in the area of VLSI Design from JNTUH, Hyderabad. His areas of research
include VLSI Design, advanced Digital Design, Cryptography and Computer
Networks and Applications. He has published 8 research papers in international
journals and conference proceedings. He has expertise in industry standard EDA tools
such as Cadence, Mentor Graphics and Xilinx Tools etc. He has 20 years of teaching
and research experience in India and abroad. He is currently working as an Associate
Head, Department of ECE in Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Dr. Prabhu G Benakopis a renowned educationalist and he is currently working as
Principal in INDUR Institute of Engineering & Technology, Telangana State, India.
Formerly he held the positions of PRINCIPAL in Aurora's Engineering College,
Director in Aurora's Technological and Research Institute, Hyderabad. He has
28years of teaching and research experience. Senior Member, IEEE, Member,
International Biomedical Engineering, Life Member of Indian Society for Technical
Education, Life Member of CSI, Life Member of Instrument Society of India.
Guided/Guiding 11 research scholars under JNTUH, Hyderabad and VTU Bangalore
for PhD programme. His areas of research include VLSI System Design, Embedded Systems, Computer
Networks, and Biomedical Signal Processing. He has published more than 90 research papers in national,
international journals and conference proceedings.

PREDOMINANCE OF BLOWFISH OVER TRIPLE DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD SYMMETRIC KEY ALGORITHM FOR SECURE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING VERILOG HDL

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to PREDOMINANCE OF BLOWFISH OVER TRIPLE DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD SYMMETRIC KEY ALGORITHM FOR SECURE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING VERILOG HDL (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

PREDOMINANCE OF BLOWFISH OVER TRIPLE DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD SYMMETRIC KEY ALGORITHM FOR SECURE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING VERILOG HDL