Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific Polyclonal Antibody BY Oral Immunization of Mice

IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS)
e-ISSN: 2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 10, Issue 1 Ver. III (Jan -Feb. 2015), PP 10-14
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10131014 www.iosrjournals.org 10 | Page
Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific
Polyclonal Antibody BY Oral Immunization of Mice
Iwalaye O. A1
., Ala A. A2
.
1
(Department of Zoology, Ekiti State University, Nigeria)
2
(Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria)
Abstract: Serological techniques are commonly used in the detection and characterization of plant viruses.
These methods employ the use of antisera produced by highly purified preparations in intramuscular,
intradermal and intraocular. In this study oral route was explored using crude extracts. Two groups (control
and experimental) of Swiss albino mice consisting of two replicates were immunized via the oral route with
crude extracts from uninfected cassava plants (Manihot esculenta) and cassava plants systematically infected
with African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV). Uninfected and infected leaves were grinded separately in saline
solution (0.15M) at 1:2 (w/v) with laboratory mortar and pestle and then filtered with double layered cheese
cloth of 75µm to obtain extracts. Clarified extracts were orally administered to the mice in daily doses of 200µl
per mice for 21 days and booster doses were also given at day 28 and 35 respectively. Antiserum were obtained
from the mice for 6 consecutive weeks after the commencement of immunization and were analyzed using
antigen coated plate (ACP) and triple antibody sandwich (TAS) indirect enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA). Group A antisera gave negative reactions (OD values < 1.5) while group B antisera reacted positively
(OD values ≥ 1.5) in the two methods used. The polyclonal antisera obtained were very specific to ACMV in
ACP and TAS ELISA. This appears to be the first antisera specific to ACMV obtained by oral immunization of
mice. Oral immunization is considered less stressful for animals, the method is a fast, simple and cheap way for
producing antisera to plant virus compared to the traditional methods of using purified preparations for
immunization. We have used this procedure in the production of antisera yet there is room for improvement in
immunization strategies to enhance antibody production. Immunization dosage can also be tried and
manipulated in bigger animals like rabbits and chicken. This research work leaves room for further exploration
of similar procedure in bigger experimental animals like rabbits and chicken for greater antiserum production.
Keywords: ACMV, Antibodies, Immunogens, Mice, Oral immunization
I. Introduction
Detection and characterisation of plant viruses are key aspects in combating pathogens. Several
techniques are employed in these procedures. In routine methods purified preparation of viruses are used for
intramuscular, intradermal and intraocular immunizations for antiserum production. A major factor limiting this
procedure is the need for a highly purified preparations. In this study, the problems were bypassed using the raw
fluid through the oral route. Ingestion of antigen stimulates the synthesis and release of specific secretory
immunoglobulin A (sIgA) antibodies into saliva, tears, colostrum, milk, gastrointestinal, respiratory and cervical
mucosal fluids [1, 2, 3, 4 & 5]. A common mucosal immune system (CMIS) has been postulated to consist of
the inductive sites, gut- associated lymphoreticular tissue, that is Peyer’s patches (PP), and bronchus associated
lymphoreticular tissue and the effector sites, laminae propriae of the gastrointestinal, upper respiratory,
genitourinary tracts and the salivary, lacrimal and mammary glands.
The preferred routes of administration are subcutaneous and intramuscular. However, oral
immunization routes are generally considered less stressful for animals, and there have also been a welcome
development in oral immunization strategies for routine production of antibodies. These routes include oral
immunization by voluntary intake of the antigen or through the gavage, as well as oral - nasal administration
through the exposure of the animal to antigen containing aerosol of the antigen and adjuvants [6]. Oral
immunization is an employed route for inducing a mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) response following antigen
uptake at Peyer’s patches of the small intestine.
The mucosal immune system comprises of several anatomically remote and functional distinct
compartments, it is firmly established that the oral ingestion or intranasal administration of antigens will induce
humoral and cellular responses not only at the site of antigen exposure but also in other mucosal compartments
[7& 8]. This is due to the dissemination of antigen- sensitized precursor B and T lymphocytes from the
inductive (e.g. intestinal Peyer’s patches) to the effector sites. Other studies have also shown that oral
immunization stimulates the immune system and the intermittent oral exposures to immunogens have been
found to result in the immergence of significantly high serum titers of specific antibodies [9]. According to [10],
small amounts of protein orally, administered escape the enzymatic digestion in the intestine and are absorbed as

Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific Polyclonal Antibody BY ….
intact antigens. To the best of our knowledge, no work has been done on the production of African cassava
mosaic virus specific polyclonal antibody by oral immunization in mice. Therefore, this study aims to produce
polyclonal antibody specific to African cassava mosaic virus in mice and also determine the ELISA protocol
that will be more sensitive to detect the antibodies produced.
1.1 African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV)
African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) of the genus Bergomovirus is a plant pathogen virus that is part
of the group of cassava mosaic geminiviruses (CMGs) in Manihot esculenta (cassava), a highly valuable African
food crop. This plant virus causes severe mosaic to cassava. Plants infected with ACMV are not killed but show
mosaic leaves appearance or loss of chlorophyll [11]. CMGs are plant viruses with a restricted dicotyledonous
host range, comprising of twinned (germinate) particles, and possess a unique capsid structure of approximately
20- 30nm in size, containing a bipartite, single stranded, circular DNA genome [12]. Their circular single
stranded DNA (ssDNA) is packaged into two incomplete TI icosahedra, which are formed by multiple of a
single coat protein (CP) [13].
II. Materials And Methods
2.1 Animals
Twenty, Eight week- old Swiss Albino female mice were purchased from the Veterinary Physiology
Department of University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The animals were acclimatized for a week before the
commencement of immunization.
2.2 Plants
Healthy leaves and leaves systematically infected with ACMV from cassava were obtained from
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria.
2.3 Preparation of Crude Extracts
Crude extracts of both healthy and infected leaves were prepared by grinding in 0.15M saline solution
at a ratio 1:2 (w/v) that is, 1g of leaf to 2ml of saline solution [14]. These extracts were filtered through double
layered cheesecloth, and stored at -20°C in 1ml aliquots.
2.4 Experimental Animals and Oral Immunization
Two groups of mice A (control) and B (experimental) were used for the experiment. Each group has
two replicate which is made up of five mice. The mice were starved for four hours before the start of oral
immunization. Group A mice were given by gavage 200µl crude leave extracts from uninfected cassava leaves
daily. Group B were fed by gavage with 200µl crude leave extracts from ACMV infected cassava leaves.
2.5 Blood Collection
The mice were bled from the tail to obtain antiserum at days 7, 14, 21 after the commencement of the
daily oral immunization and at days 28, 35 and 42, after booster immunization. The antiserum was centrifuged
at 1500rpm and the supernatant was collected in eppendorf tubes for storage and analysis [15].
2.6 Enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The antisera were tested by two indirect ELISA, ACP and TAS indirect enzyme- linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results were analysed by dividing the optical density (OD) by values from
wells loaded with antigen (D) by values of healthy controls (H) (Diseased/Healthy). Results were interpreted as
follows: < 1.5 is negative; 1.5- 1.9 is mildly positive; 2.0 -2 .9 is positive; > 3.0 is strongly positive.
2.6.1 ELISA protocols
In TAS- ELISA, the plates were coated with polyclonal antiserum at 100µl per well at 1:500 to
1:256000 dilution in coating buffer and were incubated at 37°C for 3 hours. The plates were washed thrice with
PBS- Tween. 100µl per well of antigen prepared in grinding buffer was added to each plate at 100µl per well
and was incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed and blocked with 200µl per well of 5% w/v solution of
non- fat skimmed milk powder in PBS- Tween. Plates were incubated at ambient temperature for 1 hour and
were emptied. Monoclonal antibodies at 1:500 dilution in PBS- Tween was added and plates (100µl per well)
were incubated at 37°C for 3 hours. Each plate was washed and 100µl per well of ram anti- mouse alkaline
phosphate conjugate at 1:1000 dilution was added. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 3 hours and washed. P-
Nitrophenyl phosphate substrate in substrate buffer was added at 150µl per well. The plates were incubated at
ambient temperature and were read after 1 hour and overnight using ELISA Bio track II reader at 405nm
absorbance.

In ACP- ELISA, 100µl of antigen grinded in coating buffer was added to the plates, the plates were
incubated at 4°C overnight. The plates were washed thrice with PBS- Tween and blocked with 200µl per well of
5% w/v solution of non- fat skimmed milk powder in PBS- Tween. Plates were re-incubated at 37°C for 1 hour
and were tapped dry. 100µl of polyclonal antibody diluted in conjugated buffer was added to each well and
incubated at 37°C for 3 hours. The plates were washed and treated with ram anti- mouse alkaline phosphate
conjugate diluted in conjugate buffer (100µl per well) and incubated for 3 hours and washed. P- Nitrophenyl
phosphate substrate in substrate buffer was added at 150µl per well. The plates were incubated at ambient
temperature and were read after 1 hour and overnight using ELISA Bio track II reader at 405nm absorbance.
III. Results
Fig. 1 shows the highest absorbance values of antiserum dilutions in two indirect ELISA at weeks 2, 4
and 6 after the commencement of immunization. The antisera obtained from the control group were negative to
ACMV with the highest OD values < 1.5 at week 2, 4 and 6 in both ACP and TAS ELISA. In ACP ELISA, the
antisera obtained from the experimental animals were mildly positive to ACMV with the highest OD values ≥
1.5 at week 2 and 4, and were strongly positive to ACMV with the highest OD value > 3.0 at week 6 while In
TAS ELISA, the antisera obtained from the experimental animals were negative (< 1.5), mildly positive (≥ 1.5)
and positive (≥ 2.0) to ACMV at week 2, 4 and 6 respectively. The result shows that ACP ELISA was more
sensitive in detecting the virus than TAS ELISA. In addition, the antibody titres increased relatively with
increase in weeks after immunization for both methods.
The result of the antibody titres produced in orally immunized mice at series of antiserum dilutions
against African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) in ACP ELISA is shown in fig. 2. The peak antibody titres
were recorded at 1:2000 antiserum dilutions for week 2 and 1:1000 antiserum dilutions for week 4 and 6. The
working dilutions are as follows: - 1:4000, 1:8000 and 1:64000 for week 2, 4 and 6 respectively.
Figure 1: Highest absorbance values of antiserum dilutions in two indirect ELISA at 2, 4 and 6 weeks after
immunization.

Figure 2: Antibody titres produced in mice by oral immunization at series of antiserum dilutions against
African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) in ACP ELISA.
IV. Discussion
The study showed a strong systemic immune response in mice immunized orally with crude leaf
extracts of ACMV- infected cassava plants in the absence of extract purification and immunoadjuvants. The
specific antibodies synthesized against the ACMV coat protein were detected by ACP- and TAS- ELISA. The
result showed that the crude ACMV infected leaf extracts given orally to experimental animals did not
compromise their immunogenic capability amidst the digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract by eliciting
specific immune response against ACMV. This corresponds to reports made by [10] that small amount of
protein orally administered escape the enzymatic digestion in the small intestine and are absorbed as intact
antigens. [16], also suggested that plant virus are ‘bio encapsulated’ within the plant cell walls and cell
membranes and have therefore increased resistance to digestion.
Since it is unlikely that murine epithelial cells possess receptors for ACMV, presumably the size and
particulate nature of the virus particles allow them to be efficiently taken up and retained by M- cells in gut and
nasal- associated lymphoid tissues which present them to the lymphoid cells in the underlying tissues. [15], also
reported that internalization of the virus through the gastrointestinal tract might be based on the structural
properties of the antigen molecule. The strong immunogenic property of ACMV can be ascribed to the
icosahedral structure of ACMV which could be important in facilitating mucosal uptake and immune
recognition.
The relative increase in OD values with increase in weeks after immunization resulted from re-
exposure of experimental animals to the same antigen (ACMV). This support the report made by [9], that
intermittent oral exposures to immunogens could not favour oral tolerance phenomenon and may result in
significant high serum titres of specific antibodies. The high sensitivity results from ACP- ELISA were due to
the adsorption of healthy plant antibodies produced with healthy cassava leaf extract. This ensured that
antibodies specific to cassava plants proteins were manually eliminated to prevent cross reactivity.
V. Conclusion
In conclusion, the result of this study with oral administration of crude ACMV infected demonstrated
an induction of a durable mucosal and systemic immune response without the presence of adjuvant and without
purification of virus. Therefore, ACMV is a good immunogen and can be used for oral immunization to
produce antibodies.
Acknowledgements
We duly acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Taiwo and Mrs. Patrick of the virology unit, International
Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria. Also the kind gesture of Dr. R. I. Uwumba of genetics

and molecular unit, department of Zoology, University of Ibadan for her approval towards making the
laboratory equipment accessible for use during the course of this research
References
[1]. C. Czerkinsky, S.J. Prince, S.M. Michalek, S. Jackson, M.W. Russell, Z. Moldoveanu, J.R. McGhee and J. Mestecky, IgA antibody-
producing cells in peripheral blood after antigen ingestion: evidence for a common mucosal immune system in humans, Proceedings
of the National Academy of Science, USA. 84, 1987, 2449- 2453.
[2]. R. Ganguly, P.L. Ogra, S. Regas and R.H. Waldman, Rubella immunization of volunteers via the respiratory tract, Infectious
Immunology, 8, 1972, 497- 502.
[3]. R.L. Gregory, M. Scholler, S.J. Filler, M.R. Allansmith, S.M. Michalek, J. Mestecky and J.R. McGhee, IgA antibodies to oral and
ocular bacteria in human external secretions, Protides Biology of Fluids Process and Colloqua. 32, 1985, 53-56.
[4]. J. Mestecky, J.R. McGhee, R.R.Arnold, S.M. Michalek, S.J. Prince and J.L. Babb, Selective induction of an immune response in
human external secretions by ingestion of bacteria antigen. Journal of Clinical Investment, 61, 1978, 731- 737.
[5]. P.C. Montgomery, C.I. Lemaitre and E.T. Lally, The effects of circulating antibodies on secretory IgA antibody induction following
oral immunization with di-nitrophenylated Pneumococcus, Ricca Clinic and Laboratory, 6(3), 1976, 93-99.
[6]. H. Jann and F.M.H. Coenraad, Refinement of Polyclonal Antibody Production by Combining Oral Immunization of Chickens with
Harvest of Antibodies from the Egg Yolk, ILAR Journal of Virology, 46(3), 2005, 294-299.
[7]. J. Mestecky, The common mucosal immune system and current strategies for induction of immune responses in external secretions,
Journal of Clinical Immunology, 7, 1987, 265- 276.
[8]. A. Azizi, H. Ghunaim, M.F. Diaz and J. Mestecky, Mucosal HIV vaccines: a holy grail or a dud? Vaccine, 28, 2010, 4015- 4026.
[9]. B.A. Verdolin, S.M. Ficker, A.M.C. Faria, N.M. Vaz and C.R. Carvalho, Stabilization of serum antibody responses triggered by
initial mucosal contact with the antigen independently of oral tolerance induction, Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Biological
resources, 34, 2001, 211-219.
[10]. S. Strobel and A.C.M. Mowat, Immune response to dietary antigens: Oral tolerance, Immunology Today, 19, 1998, 173-181
[11]. G. John, Controlling African Cassava Mosaic Disease, Ashley House Printing Company UK, 1999, 1-17.
[12]. B.D. Harisson, H. Barker, K.R. Bock, E.J. Guthrie, G. Meredith and M. Atkinson, Plant virus with circular single stranded DNA,
Nature, 266, 1997, 54-55
[13]. B. Betinna, U. Sigrid, C. Hugo, B.R. Robert and J. Holger, Geminate Structures of African Cassava Mosaic Virus, Journal of
Virology, 7, 2004, 6758-6765.
[14]. J.L.A. Albersio, C.A.L. Robbert and M.B.C. Fatima, Production of polyclonal antisera specific to plant viruses by rabbit oral
immunization, Fitopathologia Brazillian, 26, 2001, 774-777.
[15]. M.I. Florindo, M.E.F. de Aragao, A.C.M. da Silva, M.I. Otoch, D. Fernandes de Melo, J.A.A. Lima and M.G. Silva Lima, Immune
response induced in mice by oral immunization with cowpea severe mosaic virus, Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Biological
Resources, 35(7), 2002, 827- 835.
[16]. A. Molina, J. Veramendi and S. Hervas- Stubbs, Induction of neutralizing antibodies by a tobacco chloroplast- derived vaccine
based on a B cell epitope form canine parvovirus, Virology, 342, 2005, 266- 275.

Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific Polyclonal Antibody BY Oral Immunization of Mice

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific Polyclonal Antibody BY Oral Immunization of Mice (8)

More from iosrjce (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Production of African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) Specific Polyclonal Antibody BY Oral Immunization of Mice