Security operations center 5 security controls

5 SECURITY CONTROLS
for an Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) www.alienvault.com

The world today is comprised of two types of organizations: those who have been breached,
and those who do not yet know that they’ve been breached. The difference between these
types of organizations is related to how soon the company can detect a breach and how
effectively they can respond. An effective Security Operation Center provides the information
necessary for organizations to efficiently detect threats and subsequently contain them. While
eliminating the threats we face is an impossible goal, reducing the time it takes to respond and
contain them is certainly achievable. With a focus on responding to, and containing threats,
it is possible to define a Security Operation Center in simple terms: the technology and
processes used to detect breaches and coordinate the appropriate response.
Historical precedent has led most organizations to view Security Operation Centers as large,
overhead-intensive, situation rooms staffed by huge numbers of highly trained (expensive)
employees. This perception is due to the fact that the world has looked to the most security-
advanced organizations (large financial institutions, telecommunications operators, and military
organizations) as role models for establishing their security practices. While it is important to
learn what we can from these institutions, we should ask ourselves:
Do all organizations need to invest in the same
way to detect breaches and coordinate responses?
What are the threats my organization faces
and how does that impact my investment priorities?
Why a Security Operation Center?
“
”

Establishing a Security Operation Center is a necessary step for
an organization to be able to detect and efficiently contain a breach.
Once you’ve determined to establish a SOC, the next important question
to ask is, “how can my organization most efficiently achieve this goal?”
To answer this, it is important to be critical of your organization’s
existing capabilities.
When establishing the Security Operation Center it is important that realistic understandings of
these constraints are considered in order to ensure that an effective solution is created. If technology
already exists, but access to the data cannot be guaranteed due to political reasons, it is of little
use. Similarly, if technology is acquired but the overhead required for deployment, integration and
management is beyond the capabilities of the current employees (either because of a lack of skills
or a lack of time) then it will be of little help.
• What technologies have we already deployed that might be of use?
• Are these technologies available to my security team?
• What capabilities do I have on my security team?
• What are the current time constraints on that team?
• What priority does the larger organization place on this project?

Essential
Security Controls
The detection of breaches becomes an extraordinarily difficult task if the program is
developed from the examples of a few sophisticated breaches. However, when considered
in abstract the essential capabilities are quite basic. Securing an environment consists
of answering a few basic questions around security controls:
• What assets do I have to protect?
• Which of my assets are vulnerable to attack?
• How are people attacking my assets?
• How will I know if a breach has occurred?
• What actions are going to have the most impact on my security posture?
Now, in a simple environment with only a few unsophisticated threats, this is not a difficult
set of questions to answer. It is even possible to start evaluating these questions with manual
processes and achieve a reasonable end result. However, it does not take much for the
complexity of an environment to be beyond the scope of a manual process. For this, let us
examine the technology that can be used to automate these tasks.

SECURITY CONTROL #1:
What Assets Do I Have to Protect?
Having an understanding of the assets that your organization has is critical
to prioritizing the efforts to respond to attacks and contain breaches. Being able
to prioritize efforts to mitigate threats to a particularly critical system is essential
for an effective Security Operation Center. Often, response policies and detection
capabilities are broadly distributed without a good understanding of how they
can be most effectively deployed with respect to business impact. A good
understanding of the assets that are deployed and the services that those
assets run is essential.
• What systems are critical to the ongoing function of your company?
• Which systems are critical to the day-to-day tasks?
• What other systems do those critical systems rely on?
• Which systems manage and store sensitive information?

What Assets Do I Have to Protect?
Beyond the ability to prioritize efforts based on potential business impact, having a good
understanding of the assets deployed can help prioritize technical response to observed threats.
Hackers often start without any understanding of the technical layout of the system they are targeting.
As such, a full breach will often start with a discovery or probing phase. In this phase the attacker
will scan the network and attempt to exploit known vulnerabilities on common services. Understanding
what services are running on a particular host can allow observers of the attack to know whether it
even has a chance of being successful; trying to exploit a Microsoft Windows vulnerability on a Unix
machine has no chance of succeeding.
Getting an accurate view of the assets deployed and the services running on those assets is
a very difficult problem. The IT operations team can sometimes provide a reasonable picture in an
asset management system. However, these systems are hard to access and are often out of date.
An automated solution to this problem is preferable to ensure that the rapid rate of change found
in modern data centers is accurately pictured in the security operation center.

These techniques can be employed individually or in concert with one another. Each approach requires
a different amount of access to the environment to be inventoried; using a variety of approaches ensures that
some information can be gathered even from tightly controlled environments.
A good solution will provide a flexible approach to asset discovery, leveraging one or more of the techniques
listed above to provide the most accurate picture possible. In addition, it will provide a centralized mechanism
for discovering assets in remote segments of the network. Even a moderately complex network topology can
cause operators to be faced with difficult access procedures, requiring manual steps to discover assets in
remote network segments and adding to the long-term cost of managing the solution.
Learn about asset discovery and inventory with AlienVault USM
PASSIVE NETWORK MONITORING
By passively monitoring the network, traffic hosts and installed software packages
are enumerated, identifying the protocols and ports used in the captured traffic.
ACTIVE NETWORK SCANNING
Active scanning probes the network to try and elicit responses from machines.
Based on the response, the tool will identify the machine and the software installed
on the machine.
TO PERFORM ASSET DISCOVERY,
TWO AUTOMATED APPROACHES
CAN BE TAKEN:

Which of My Assets Are Vulnerable to Attack?
Once you have a reasonable understanding of the assets deployed in your organization, it is important
to understand where your weaknesses lie. When responding to an attack or breach, understanding how
your organization may be exploited is a critical factor in prioritization. Knowing that a particular system
is vulnerable to attack may make the environment that system operates in one of your top security priorities.
For example, if a critical business process relies on an antiquated web-server that cannot be updated due
to functional concerns, additional efforts can be made to ensure that the web-server is well protected
from attacks. Or if a breach is detected on the same network segment as the web-server, additional priority
can be given to the incident response effort. It is not always feasible to remove a vulnerability in your
system, but it is possible to understand where they lie and what impact might occur if they were to be
exploited. Having a good understanding where your weaknesses lie is essential to understanding what
efforts to prioritize when faced with an attack or a breach.
• How are the services that I have running configured?
• How can they be accessed?
• Do any of them have known vulnerabilities that an attacker may be able to exploit?

Which of My Assets Are Vulnerable to Attack?
Vulnerability assessment is a difficult and time-consuming effort. The software that is deployed
in our environments, whether in the form of web applications, middleware or even the firmware in
our devices, is all inherently vulnerable. Every piece of software has flaws that could potentially
be exploited. This is largely due to the fact that security is often not considered during development.
Even if security were a consideration, new methods for attack are always being developed, making
the software that was secure a year ago vulnerable today. Because of the nature of this problem,
vulnerability assessment is a continuous process, and ultimately a very difficult task to perform in an
automated manner.
Understanding how a piece of software might be exploited often requires knowing how that
software works, what types of data it accepts and what function it is supposed to perform. This is why
the vulnerability assessment that is performed in our network environments simply tries to identify
software packages that contain known vulnerabilities. Once the simplification of the scope of this task
is done, automation can be performed.

As both of these methods rely on a database of known vulnerabilities, it is important that they are performed
periodically. Researchers publish information about new vulnerabilities constantly, and having an up to date
database is the only way to ensure that your analysis engine can detect all of the latest vulnerabilities.
As with asset discovery the deployment of vulnerability assessment can be a logistical hurdle. A good solution
will provide a flexible approach in tightly controlled environments as well as provide for centralized management
of the vulnerability assessment scans in environments with complex network topologies.
Learn about Vulnerability Assessment & Remediation with AlienVault USM
ACTIVE NETWORK SCANNING
An active network scan actively probes hosts using carefully crafted network traffic to elicit
a response. This combination of the targeted traffic and the subsequent response allows
an analysis engine to determine the configuration of the remote system and the software packages
running on the system. This combined with a database of known vulnerabilities allows the analysis
to produce a list of vulnerabilities that are present on the system.
HOST-BASED ASSESSMENT
Using access to the file system of a system, an analysis engine can perform a more accurate
and comprehensive detection of vulnerabilities by inspecting the installed software and comparing
the detected software packages with a list of known vulnerable software packages.
THE FOLLOWING APPROACHES
CAN BE USED TO AUTOMATE
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

HOW ARE PEOPLE ATTACKING MY ASSETS?
Due to the nature of the Internet, there is not a single one of us who is not being attacked.
Unlike the physical world, on the Internet it is quite simple for attackers to find us in an automated
manner. The attacker may not know exactly whom they are attacking, but finding our front door
is as simple as counting. Also unlike the physical world an automated attack against many
systems is not any more expensive than an attack against a single system. As such, attackers are
constantly scanning the Internet blindly attacking any and all systems they can find. For example,
a simple web-server serving a web page for a private audience that had not been indexed by
Google was faced with an average of 50 intrusion attempts every day. Every single one of us is
constantly being attacked; understanding the nature, target, and sophistication of those attacks
is critical when prioritizing our security efforts.
• Is anyone attacking my systems?
• What techniques are hackers employing when trying to compromise my systems?
• Where are those attacks coming from?

Threat detection can be thought of as the inverse problem of vulnerability assessment. Vulnerability
assessment is the methodology for finding known vulnerabilities in your system; threat detection is the
means to identify the attacks that are targeting those vulnerabilities.
Some attacks target particular vulnerabilities with known payloads; these can easily be detected using
a signature that can identify those payloads. Other attacks are less well known and in these scenarios
it can be possible to try and detect the technique the attacker is using to exploit the vulnerability. For
example, when trying to exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability the attacker must inject the software
with a large amount of data to overflow the memory segment the program is using for a particular
buffer. Once this is achieved the attacker must then try to gain control of the execution of the program
by writing machine instructions to the memory they have just overwritten. Since the attacker does not
know the exact way their attack is going to be handled they must put in some room for error; this is
often achieved by using a long string of ‘no operation’ instructions that will be essentially ignored by
the machine. This, however, leaves a nice fingerprint for threat detection tools to try and find—a large
amount of data being passed to a program that contains a long string of ‘no operation’ instructions can
be identified as a potential exploit attempt. Alternatively, it is possible to detect indicators of an attack
or indicators of compromise.

As discussed before, targeted attacks often start with a discovery phase where the attacker is trying
to identify vulnerable assets in your network. Detecting that a particular host is trying to probe your
system can be essential to later evaluating whether or not a potential attack from the same host is real.
The last resort to detecting threats is trying to detect indicators of compromise.
As with the other security capabilities discussed, it is essential that a flexible approach be taken in
order to detect threats. Attackers explicitly craft attacks to evade different types of threat detection
capabilities. Having layered, redundant, threat detection capabilities is the best way to ensure that an
attack is identified.

INTRUSION DETECTION CAN
BE AUTOMATED USING THE
FOLLOWING APPROACHES:
Another important consideration is the placement of the threat detection capabilities that are deployed. Often
these capabilities are only deployed on the perimeter of the organization with the thought that attacks only come
from the outside. Modern attacks have broken this mold; today attackers leverage the fact that employees use
their computers both inside and outside of the corporate firewall. A computer compromised while outside the
perimeter now becomes a jumping off point for an attack from within the network. Threat detection should be
deployed pervasively to address this. A good solution for threat detection will employ multiple techniques and
provide substantial management capabilities to reduce the long term deployment costs.
Learn about Threat Detection with AlienVault USM
NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION (IDS)
Analyzes the network traffic to detect signatures of known attacks and
patterns that indicate malicious activity. This is used to identify attacks, malware,
policy violations and port scans.
HOST-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION
Analyzes system behavior and configuration to identify behavior that could
indicate compromise. This includes the ability to recognize common rootkits, to
detect rogue processes, and detect modification to critical configuration files.

HOW WILL I KNOW IF A BREACH HAS OCCURRED?
Not all breaches are avoidable. Our efforts to make an impenetrable system will never be enough
to close all attack vectors. We will always be faced with a risk management decision when it comes to
determining whether a vulnerability in an asset running a critical business process is worth the cost
of disrupting that process. Attackers know this and will always use this to their advantage. To ensure that
the advantage they gain from this is as minimal as possible, it is important for us to detect a breach as
quickly as possible.
Understanding the behavior of our systems and monitoring that behavior for indications that a breach
may have occurred is essential to an efficient response. For example, if an internal server that only sends
and receives HTTP traffic suddenly opens up an outbound ssh tunnel to an external server, we have
good reason to think that the server has been compromised. Understanding the behavior of your system
as a whole includes understanding what assets communicate with one another, determining when
services appear and disappear, and modeling network flow and protocol usage to detect anomalies.
• If I do not detect the attack how will I know an asset is compromised?
• If an asset is compromised how can I address it before the breach expands?

MONITORING BEHAVIOR
CAN BE PERFORMED WITH THE
FOLLOWING APPROACHES
The information that can be gathered by behavioral monitoring tools must be used with caution.
The systems run in our organization are far from predictable—seasonal peaks such as an end-of- the-
quarter sales effort can cause loads and behaviors never seen before. A good solution for behavioral
monitoring will provide multiple mechanisms for collecting this data. In addition it will provide a low-
overhead mechanism for pervasive deployment in the organization.
Learn about Behavioral Monitoring with AlienVault USM
ACTIVE SERVICE MONITORING
Actively validate that services running on hosts are
continuously available. This is done with a network-
level handshake and response providing feedback
if the service becomes available.
NETFLOW ANALYSIS
Analyzes the protocols and bandwidth used by
each. This is done by capturing metadata from a
TCP/IP stream, saving protocol information as well
as calculating bandwidth usage.
NETWORK TRAFFIC CAPTURE
Captures the full TCP/IP stream. Allows for
forensic storage of the stream so that detailed
inspection can be performed if necessary.
HOST-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION
Can monitor the processes and resources used
on a particular system. Detecting new processes or
abnormal resource usage can be indicators of
a compromise.

WHAT ACTIONS ARE GOING TO HAVE THE
MOST IMPACT ON MY SECURITY POSTURE?
When deployed at scale, the essential controls described to provide asset discovery, vulnerability
assessment, threat detection, and behavioral monitoring produce a vast amount of data. The
comprehension and prioritization of that data needs to be automated in order for decisions to be
made within a reasonable timeframe. In addition it is important for the data that is produced to be
evaluated in conjunction with the data from the other security controls. Evaluation of each stream
of data independently will lead to poor prioritization of efforts. For example, a new vulnerability is
discovered on a host. Without having an understanding of what services that host provides or what
attacks the host is being targeted with, it is hard to say whether it is more important to patch the
vulnerability or to remove the malware just found on another server.
• What do I do first?
• What data should I analyze today?
• Should I stop a recently observed attack or try and contain a newly discovered breach?

WHAT ACTIONS ARE GOING TO HAVE THE MOST
IMPACT ON MY SECURITY POSTURE?
However, if we know that the host in question provides our business partners with the ability
to refer customers to us and the server that has the malware infection is in our testing lab,
then we can start to make better decisions. The ability to make sense of this data requires
a system to consolidate and manage it all. That system must also provide normalization
capabilities so that the data from disparate sources can be related to each other and the full
picture can be presented to the ultimate consumer of the information.

The most important aspect of a SIEM platform is how effectively the platform is able to correlate
and present the data that is collected. The sole purpose of this platform is to increase the efficiency of
the user who must analyze all of the data that is fed into it. Being able to associate the data together
and respond to user query is necessary for a user to be able to understand all of the data, however it is
not sufficient functionality to reach our goal of improving operator efficiency. The platform must be able
to automate the correlation of the data in order to detect malicious behavior, large-scale attacks, and
breaches. In a good solution this correlation is kept up to date with the latest threat intelligence allowing
it to detect the newest methods of attackers and behaviors of malicious software.
Learn more about Security Information & Event Management with AlienVault USM
SECURITY INFORMATION & EVENT MANAGEMENT (SIEM)
An informed management platform specifically designed for the
evaluation of security information and events. Provides capabilities
to normalize and analyze data from disparate sources and correlate
it together to present a more complete picture of the incidents
occurring in the overall system.
THERE IS ONLY ONE APPROACH TO
AUTOMATING THE COMPREHENSION
OF DATA TODAY:

Deployment of the
Essential Capabilities
Security organizations are faced with a difficult challenge—if a major breach occurs it will be their
fault regardless of the support the organization has provided the security team before that date. The
capabilities described above are essential for a security team to prevent breaches from occurring or
containing breaches before they become a major problem. However, security teams are often given
little political or logistical support within an organization. Business concerns such as budget, and
resource allocation often take priority over proactive security. Given this limitation security teams must
be as efficient as possible while establishing a Security Operations Center. In order to get a complete
picture and comprehensive prioritization, the security tools providing the essential capabilities must
be pervasively deployed throughout the organization.

Deployment of the
Essential Capabilities
To reduce the cost of this deployment it is important to try and find ways to use redundant
infrastructure whenever possible. Most of the security tools require access to the far reaches of
the network, whether to monitor the network traffic or to gather data about a host. If each tool
is independently deployed then each tool will require configuration to understand your network
topology and will require the proper credentials to gain access to every segment. In a similar
fashion, a large number of these tools require rules or threat information to be periodically
updated. If a common update mechanism can be used to provide rules to each of the tools
then the amount of configuration will be greatly reduced.
Another consideration is the cost of integrating the individual security controls that are deployed.
As discussed above, a SIEM product is designed to consume and evaluate the data that is produced
by these products. However, a SIEM platform is only a means to an end. It is intended for the
integration of any type of data and often requires substantial effort to integrate a new data source.

Conclusion
The capabilities discussed in this paper are the essential enablers for an
organization to effectively and efficiently respond to threats and contain breaches.
While the deployment of all of these capabilities is a daunting task, it is ultimately
a cost- and time-saving project. Without having visibility into the actual threats facing
your system, money will be inefficiently spent on compensating controls that might
not have any impact. It is important for organizations to realistically evaluate how money
is being spent and critically ask whether there is data from their own environment that
substantiates the spend on these projects. Establishing a security operation center,
the technology and processes used to detect
breaches and coordinate the appropriate response,
is the first step to long term, cost-effective,
management of risk.

AlienVault USM
BRINGS IT ALL TOGETHER
ASSET DISCOVERY
Active Network Scanning
Passive Network Scanning
Asset Inventory
Host-based Software Inventory
SECURITY
INTELLIGENCE
SIEM Event Correlation
Incident Response
INTRUSION DETECTION
Network, Host & Wireless IDS
File Integrity Monitoring
VULNERABILITY
ASSESSMENT
Continuous Vulnerability Monitoring
Authenticated / Unauthenticated
Active Scanning
BEHAVIORAL
MONITORING
Log Collection
Netflow Analysis
Service Availability Monitoring
powered by
AV Labs Threat
Intelligence

Next Steps: Play, share, enjoy!
www.alienvault.com
• Learn more about AlienVault USM
• Watch our 3-minute overview video
• Start detecting threats today with a free 30-day trial
• Join the Open Threat Exchange

Security operations center 5 security controls

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (19)

Similar to Security operations center 5 security controls (20)

More from AlienVault (19)

Recently uploaded (20)

Security operations center 5 security controls