SEMINAR REPORT ON 3D PASSWORD

1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 AUTHENTICATION
Authentication is a process of validating who are you to whom you claimed to be or a process
of identifying an individual, usu33ally based on a username and password. To protect any system
authentication must be provided, so that only authorized persons can have right to use or handle that
system & data related to that system securely. There are many authentication algorithms are available
some are effective & secure but having some drawback. Previously there are many authentication
techniques were introduced such as graphical password, text password, Biometric authentication, etc.
Generally there are three types of authentication techniques are available such as:
Fig. 1.1 Classification of existing authentication systems
Human
Authentication
Techniques
Knowledge based -
What you KNOW
Textual Password
Graphical Password
Token based - What
you HAVE
ATM cards
Keys
ID keys
Biometrics - What
you ARE
Finger prints, palm prints
Hand geometry
Iris, face, voice recognition

2
1.2 DRAWBACKS IN EXISTING AUTHENTICATION SYSTEMS
1.2.1 TEXTUAL PASSWORDS
Recall-based techniques require the user to repeat or reproduce a secret that the user created
before. Recognition based techniques require the user to identify and recognize the secret, or part of
it, that the user selected before. One of the most common recall-based authentication schemes used
in the computer world is textual passwords. One major drawback of the textual password is its two
conflicting requirements: the selection of passwords that are easy to remember and, at the same time,
are hard to guess.
1.2.2 GRAPHICAL PASSWORDS
Graphical passwords are based on the idea that users can recall and recognize pictures
better than words. However, some of the graphical password schemes require a long time to be
performed. Moreover, most of the graphical passwords can be easily observed or recorded while
the legitimate user is performing the graphical password; thus, it is vulnerable to shoulder surfing
attacks. Currently, most graphical passwords are still in their research phase and require more
enhancements and usability studies to deploy them in the market.
1.2.3 BIOMETRICS
Many biometric schemes have been proposed; fingerprints, palmprints, hand geometry,
face recognition, voice recognition, iris recognition, and retina recognition are all different
biometric schemes. Each biometric recognition scheme has its advantages and disadvantages based
on several factors such as consistency, uniqueness, and acceptability. One of the main drawbacks
of applying biometrics is its intrusiveness upon a user’s personal characteristic. Moreover, retina
biometrical recognition schemes require the user to willingly subject their eyes to a low-intensity
infrared light. In addition, most biometric systems require a special scanning device to authenticate
users, which is not applicable for remote and Internet users.

3
2. WHAT IS 3D PASSWORD
The 3D password is a multifactor authentication scheme. It can combine all existing
authentication schemes into a single 3D virtual environment. This 3D virtual environment contains
several objects or items with which the user can interact. The type of interaction varies from one item
to another. The 3D password is constructed by observing the actions and interactions of the user and
by observing the sequences of such actions. It is the user’s choice to select which type of
authentication techniques will be part of their 3D password.
In 3D password, the user has to first authenticate with simple textual password (i.e. user need
to provide user name and password). Once authentication successful then user moves in 3D virtual
environment, then user automatically enter into an art gallery, where he/she has to select multiple
point in that gallery or he can do some action in that environment like switching button on/off or
perform action associated with any object like opening door, etc. The sequence in which user has
clicked that sequence of points are stored in text file in the encrypted form. In this way the password is
set for that particular user. Next time when user wants to access his account then he has to select all
the objects which he has selected at the time of creating password with proper sequence. This
sequence is then compared with coordinates which are stored in file. If authentication successful
thereafter access is given to authorized user.
This is achieved through interacting only with the objects that acquire information that the user
is comfortable in providing and ignoring the objects that request information that the user prefers not
to provide. Moreover, giving the user the freedom of choice as to what type of authentication schemes
will be part of their 3D password and given the large number of objects and items in the environment,
the number of possible 3D passwords will increase. Thus, it becomes much more difficult for the
attacker to guess the user’s 3D password.
The following necessities are satisfied in proposed scheme:
1. The new scheme provide secrets that are easy to remember and very difficult for intruders to
guess.
2. The new scheme should be difficult to share with others.
3. The new scheme provides secrets that can be easily revoked or changed.

4
3. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
The system implementation can be done by designing a 3D virtual environment that contains
objects that request information to be recalled, information to be recognized, tokens to be presented,
and biometric data to be verified.
For example, the user can enter the virtual environment and type something on a computer that
exists in (x1, y1, z1) position, then enter a room that has a fingerprint recognition device that exists in
a position (x2, y2, z2) and provide his/her fingerprint. Then, the user can go to the virtual garage, open
the car door, and turn on the radio to a specific channel. The combination and the sequence of the
previous actions toward the specific objects construct the user’s 3D password.
Virtual objects can be any object that we encounter in real life. Any obvious actions and
interactions toward the real life objects can be done in the virtual 3D environment toward the virtual
objects. Moreover, any user input (such as speaking in a specific location) in the virtual 3D
environment can be considered as a part of the 3D password. We can have the following objects:
1. A computer with which the user can type.
2. A fingerprint reader that requires the user’s fingerprint.
3. An ATM machine that requires a smart card and PIN.
4. A light that can be switched on/off.
5. A car that can be driven.
Fig. 3.1 3D password selection and inputs

5
4. HOW THE TECHNOLOGY WORKS
4.1 WORKING OF 3D PASSWORD
Consider a three dimensional virtual environment space that is of the size G×G×G. Each point
in the three dimensional environment space represented by the coordinates (x, y, z) ∈ [1..G] × [1..G] ×
[1..G]. The objects are distributed in the three-dimensional virtual environment. Every object has its
own (x, y, z) coordinates. Assume the user can navigate and walk through the three-dimensional
virtual environment and can see the objects and interact with the objects. The input device for
interactions with objects can be a mouse, a keyboard, stylus, a card reader, a microphone…etc.
For example, consider a user who navigates through the 3D virtual environment that consists
of a ground and a classroom. Let us assume that the user is in the virtual ground and the user turns
around to the door located in (9, 16, 80) and opens it. The user types "ANGEL" into a computer that
exists in the position of (10, 5, 25). The user then walks over and turns off the light located in (15, 6,
20), and then the user closes the door. The user then presses the login button.
The initial representation of user actions in the 3D virtual environment can be recorded as
follows:
(9, 16, 80) Action = Open the office door;
(10, 5, 25) Action = Typing, “A”;
(10, 5, 25) Action = Typing, “N”;
(10, 5, 25) Action = Typing, “G”;
(10, 5, 25) Action = Typing, “E”;
(10, 5, 25) Action = Typing, “L”;
(15, 6, 20) Action = Turning the Light Off;
(9, 16, 80) Action = Close the office door;
4.2 3D VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES
The design of the 3 D virtual environments affects the usability, effectiveness, acceptability of
3D password. The first step in building a 3D password system is to design a 3D environment that
reflects the administration needs and the security requirements. The design of 3D virtual environments
should follow these guidelines.

6
4.2.1 REAL LIFE SIMILARITY
The prospective 3D virtual environment should reflect what people are used to seeing in real
life. Objects used in virtual environments should be relatively similar in size to real objects (sized to
scale). Possible actions and interactions toward virtual objects should reflect real life situations.
Object responses should be realistic. The target should have a 3D virtual environment that users can
interact.
4.2.2 OBJECT UNIQUENESS AND DISTINCTION
Every virtual object or item in the 3D virtual environment is different from any other virtual
object. The uniqueness comes from the fact that every virtual object has its own attributes such as
position. Thus, the prospective interaction with object 1 is not equal to the interaction with object 2.
However, having similar objects such as 20 computers in one place might confuse the user. Therefore,
the design of the 3D virtual environment should consider that every object should be distinguishable
from other objects. Similarly, in designing a 3D virtual environment, it should be easy for users to
navigate through and to distinguish between objects. The distinguishing factor increases the user’s
recognition of objects. Therefore, it improves the system usability.
4.2.3 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT SIZE
A 3D virtual environment can depict a city or even the world. On the other hand, it can depict
a space as focused as a single room or office. A large 3D virtual environment will increase the time
required by the user to perform a 3D password. Moreover, a large 3D virtual environment can contain
a large number of virtual objects. Therefore, the probable 3D password space broadens. However, a
small 3D virtual environment usually contains only a few objects, and thus, performing a 3D
password will take less time.
4.2.4 NUMBER OF OBJECTS AND THEIR TYPES
Part of designing a 3D virtual environment is determining the types of objects and how many
objects should be placed in the environment. The types of objects reflect what kind of responses the
object will have. For simplicity, we can consider requesting a textual password or a fingerprint as an
object response type. Selecting the right object response types and the number of objects affects the
probable password space of a 3D password.

7
4.2.5 SYSTEM IMPORTANCE
The 3D virtual environment should consider what systems will be protected by a 3D password.
The number of objects and the types of objects that have been used in the 3D virtual environment
should reflect the importance of the protected system.
Fig. 4.1 State diagram of 3D password application

8
5. SECURITY ANALYSIS
To analyse and study how secure a system is, we have to consider how hard it is for the
attacker to break such a system. A possible measurement is based on the information content of a
password space, which is defined as “the entropy of the probability distribution over that space given
by the relative frequencies of the passwords that users actually choose.” As a result, it is
important to have a scheme that has a very large possible password space as one factor for increasing
the work required by the attacker to break the authentication system. Another factor is to find a
scheme that has no previous or existing knowledge of the most probable user password
selection, which can also resist the attack on such an authentication scheme.
Fig. 5.1 Password space of the 3D password, textual password, passfaces, and DAS
5.1 3D PASSWORD SPACE SIZE
One important factor to determine how difficult it is to launch an attack on an authentication
system is the size of the password space. To determine the 3D password space, we have to count all
possible 3D passwords that have a certain number of actions, interactions, and inputs toward all
objects that exist in the 3D virtual environment.
We assume that the length of the 3D password is Lmax, and the probability of the 3D password
of size greater than Lmax is zero.

9
To measure the 3D password space, we will calculate Π (Lmax, G) on a 3D virtual
environment that has the space (G x G x G) for a 3D password of a length (number of actions,
interactions, and inputs) of Lmax or less.
In the following expression (1), AC represents the possible actions towards 3D virtual
environment whereas Π represents total numbers of possible 3D passwords of length Lmax or less:
In the following expression (2), Omax is the number of objects in the 3D virtual
environment:
Where xi = xj, yi = yj, and zi = zj, only if i = j. The design of the 3D environment will
determine the value of Omax. The variable m represents all possible actions and interactions
toward all existing objects Oi. However, g(AC) counts the total number of actions and inputs
toward the 3D virtual environment, whereas m, as we mentioned before, counts the actions and
interactions toward the objects. An example of g(AC) can be a user movement pattern, which can
be considered as a part of the user’s 3D password.
The function is the number of possible actions and interactions toward the object Oi based
on the object type Ti. Object types can be textual password objects, DAS objects, or any
authentication scheme.
The function f is determined from the object type. It counts the possible actions and
interactions that the object can accept. If we assume that an object “Keyboard” is in location (x0,
y0, z0) of type = textual password, f will count the possible characters and numbers that can be
typed, which is around 93 possibilities.
As we mentioned before, an object type is one of the important factors that affects the
overall password space.

10
Therefore, higher outcomes of function f mean larger 3D password space size.
Fig 5.2 Number of possible actions/interactions of a 3D password within a 3D environment
The above figure shows the points where the 3D password exceeds two important textual
password points. Point “a” shows that by having only two actions and interactions as a 3D
password, the 3D password exceeds the number of textual passwords used by Klein [2]
to break 25%
of textual passwords of eight characters. Point “b” represents the full textual password space of eight
characters or less. It shows that by performing only four interactions, actions, and inputs as a 3D
password, the 3D password space exceeds the full textual passwords of eight characters or less.
From the previous equations, we observe that the number of objects and the type of
actions and interactions determines the probable password space. Therefore, the design of the 3D
virtual environment is a very critical part of the 3D password system. Figs. 4 and 5 illustrate the
resulting password space of the proposed 3D password compared to textual password, Passfaces, and
DAS of a grid of 5 x 5 and 10 x 10, respectively. Notice the difference between a 3D passwords
built on a simple 3D virtual environment compared to the other authentication schemes.

11
5.2 3D PASSWORD DISTRIBUTION KNOWLEDGE
Users tend to use meaningful words for textual passwords. Therefore finding these different
words from dictionary is a relatively simple task which yields a high success rate for breaking textual
passwords. Passfaces users tend to choose faces that reflect their own taste on facial attractiveness,
race, and gender. Every user has different requirements and preferences when selecting the appropriate
3D Password. This will increase the effort to find a pattern of user’s highly selected 3D password.
In addition, since the 3D password combines several authentication schemes into a single
authentication environment, the attacker has to study every single authentication scheme and has to
discover what the most probable selected secrets are. Since every 3D password system can be designed
according to the protected system requirements, the attacker has to separately study every 3D password
system. Therefore, more effort is required to build the knowledge of most probable 3D passwords.
Studying the user’s behavior of password selection and knowing the most probable textual
passwords are the key behind dictionary attacks. Klein used such knowledge to collect a small set of
3 x 106
words that have a high probability of usage among users. The question is how has such
information (highly probable passwords) been found and why. Users tend to choose words that
have meaning as places, names, famous people’s names, sports terms, and biological terminologies.
Therefore, finding these different words from the dictionary is a relatively simple task.
Using such knowledge yields a high success rate for breaking textual passwords. Any
authentication scheme is affected by the knowledge distribution of the user’s secrets Passfaces.
Users tend to choose faces that reflect their own taste on facial attractiveness, race, and gender.
Moreover, 10% of male passwords have been guessed in only two guesses. Another study about user
selection of DAS concluded that for their secret passwords, users tend to draw things that have
Meaning, which simplifies the attacker’s task.
Currently, knowledge about user behaviors on selecting their 3D password does not exist.
Every user has different requirements and preferences when selecting the appropriate 3D password.
This fact will increase the effort required to find a pattern of user’s highly selected 3D
password. In addition, since the 3D password combines several authentication schemes into a single
authentication environment, the attacker has to study every single authentication scheme and has to
discover what the most probable selected secrets are.

12
For textual password, the highly probable selected textual password might be determined
by the use of dictionaries. Since every 3D password system can be designed according to the
protected system requirements, the attacker has to separately study every 3D password system. This
is because objects that exist in one 3D password system might not exist on other 3D password
systems. Therefore, more effort is required to build the knowledge of most probable 3D passwords.
5.3 ATTACKS AND COUNTERMEASURES
To realize and understand how far an authentication scheme is secure, we have to consider all
possible attack methods. We have to study whether the authentication scheme proposed is immune
against such attacks or not. Moreover, if the proposed authentication scheme is not immune, we then
have to find the countermeasures that prevent such attacks. In this section, we try to cover most
possible attacks and whether the attack is valid or not. Moreover, we try to propose countermeasures
for such attacks.
5.3.1 BRUTE FORCE ATTACK
The attacker has to try all possible 3D passwords. This kind of attack is very difficult for the
following reasons:
1. Time required to login needed for a legitimate user to login may vary depending on the number
of interactions and actions, the size of the 3D virtual environment, and the type of actions and
interactions. Therefore, a brute force attack on a 3D password is very difficult and time
consuming.
2. The 3D virtual environment contains biometric recognition objects and token based objects.
The attacker has to forge all possible biometric information and forge all the required tokens.
The cost of forging such information is very high, therefore cracking the 3D password is more
challenging.
5.3.2 WELL – STUDIED ATTACK
The attacker tries to find the highest probable distribution of 3D passwords. In order to launch
such an attack, the attacker has to acquire knowledge of the most probable 3D password distributions.
This is very difficult because the attacker has to study all the existing authentication schemes that are
used in the 3D environment. This environment has a number of objects and types of object responses
that differ from any other 3D virtual environment. Therefore, a carefully customized study is required
to initialize an effective attack.

13
5.3.3 SHOULDER SURFING ATTACK
An attacker uses a camera to record the user’s 3D password or tries to watch the legitimate user
while the 3D password is being performed. This attack is the most successful type of attack against 3D
passwords and some other graphical passwords. However, the user’s 3D password may contain
biometric data or textual passwords that cannot be seen from behind. Therefore, we assume that the 3D
password should be performed in a secure place where a shoulder surfing attack cannot be performed.
5.3.4 TIMING ATTACK
In this attack, the attacker observes how long it takes the legitimate user to perform a correct
sign in using the 3D password. This observation gives the attacker an indication of the legitimate
user’s 3D password length. However, this kind of attack alone cannot be very successful since it gives
the attacker mere hints. Therefore, it would probably be launched as part of a well studied or brute
force attack.
5.4 MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS
5.4.1 TIME COMPLEXITY
For calculating the time complexity of 3D password scheme let‘s assume A be the virtual 3D
environment plotting and B is algorithmic processing. From this data available we have come to time
complexity of system.
Time Complexity = A
m
+ B
n
Where m is time required to communicate with system and n is time required to process each
algorithm in 3D environment.
5.4.2 SPACE COMPLEXITY
This system include 3D virtual environment, so that each point in this environment will having
3 co-ordinate values. Any point from 3D virtual environment is represented in the form of (X, Y, Z)
where X, Y & Z are the coordinate values stored for particular point. We are storing three co-ordinate
values of each point such as (x1, y1, z1). Therefore the space complexity is n3.

14
6. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
We have built an experimental 3D virtual environment that contains several objects of two
types. The first type of response is textual password. The second type of response is requesting
graphical passwords. Almost 30 users volunteered to experiment with the environment. We asked the
users to create their 3D password and to sign in using 3D password several times over several days.
In our experiment, we have used Java Open GL to build the 3D virtual environment and
we have used a 1.80-GHz Pentium M Centrino machine with 512-MB random access memory
and ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 video card. The design of the experimental 3D virtual environment
represents an art gallery that the user can walk through and is depicted below.
Table 6.1 Resulting number of possible 3D passwords of total length Lmax

15
We conducted a user study on 3D passwords using the experimental 3D virtual
environments. The study reviewed the usage of textual passwords and other authentication schemes.
The study covered almost 30 users. The users varied in age, sex, and education level. Even though
it is a small set of users, the study produced some distinct results. We observed the following
regarding textual passwords, 3D passwords, and other authentication schemes.
1. Most users who use textual passwords of 9–12 character lengths or who use random
characters as a password have only one to three unique passwords.
2. More than 50% of user’s textual passwords are eight characters or less.
3. Almost 25% of users use meaningful words as their textual passwords.
4. Almost 75% of users use meaningful words or partially meaningful words as their textual
passwords. In contrast, only 25% of users use random characters and letters as textual
passwords.
5. Over 40% of users have only one to three unique textual passwords, and over 90% of users
have eight unique textual passwords or less.
6. Over 90% of users do not change their textual passwords unless they are required to by the
system.
7. Over 95% of users under study have never used any graphical password scheme as a means of
authentication.
8. Most users feel that 3D passwords have a high acceptability.
9. Most users believe that there is no threat to personal privacy by using a 3D password as an
authentication scheme.

16
7. APPLICATIONS
The 3D password can have a password space that is very large compared to other
authentication schemes, so the 3D password’s main application domains are protecting critical
systems and resources. Possible critical applications include the following.
1. Critical server: Many large organizations have critical servers that are usually protected by
a textual password. A 3D password authentication proposes a sound replacement for a textual
password.
2. Nuclear and military facilities: Such facilities should be protected by the most powerful
authentication systems. The 3D password has a very large probable password space, and since it can
contain token, biometrics, recognition and knowledge based authentications in a single authentication
system, it is a sound choice for high level security locations.
3. Airplanes and jet fighters: Because of the possible threat of misusing airplanes and jet
fighters for religion, political agendas, usage of such airplanes should be protected by a powerful
authentication system. In addition, 3D passwords can be used in less critical systems because the 3D
virtual environment can be designed to fit to any system needs.
4. A small virtual environment can be used in the following systems like:
a) ATM
b) Personal Digital Assistance
c) Desktop Computers and Laptop Logins
d) Web Authentication
e) Security Analysis

17
8. ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE
8.1 ADVANTAGE
1. It provides user options to choose the type of authentication of his/her own choice.
 There are number of options available for users to choose sequence of own choice.
 In 3D password user can build a sequence which is easier for him to remember.
2. It eliminates a brute force attack.
 All data and critical information like passwords are stored in encrypted manner so it’s
difficult for brute force attack to crack it.
 In 3D password combination of recognition and recall base are using so it is difficult.
3. Provides high level security to the system which contains more important data.
 Its provide hide securities to data using multi factors and multiple technique to protect
data.
4. Secure against a software like key logger.
 Software like key logger installed in a system it’s difficult to secure your data these types
software’s are stored all text which are pass through the keyboard. In 3D password
graphical password is also use for authentication.
8.2 DISADVANTAGE
1. Shoulder attack.
Attackers observe the user from back shoulder than easily break their authentication.
2. More time and memory.
To use 3D password its require more time and memory chunk because 3D password need
more space to store in database.
3. It’s expensive.
3D Password is more expensive compare to other authentication technique.
4. Complexity.
3D password is more complexity in coding.

18
9. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
The choice of what authentication schemes will be part of the user’s 3D password reflects the
user’s preferences and requirements. A user who prefers to remember and recall a password might
choose textual and graphical passwords as part of their 3D password. On the other hand, users
who have more difficulty with memory or recall might prefer to choose smart cards or biometrics
as part of their 3D password. Moreover, users who prefer to keep any kind of biometrical data
private might not interact with objects that require biometric information. Therefore, it is the
user’s choice and decision to construct the desired and preferred 3D password.
The 3D password is still in its early stages. Designing various kinds of 3D virtual environments,
deciding on password spaces, and interpreting user feedback and experiences from such environments
will result in enhancing and improving the user experience of the 3D password. Gathering attackers
from different background and attack made by them and how to overcome them is main future work.
Shoulder surfing attacks are still possible so how to overcome that is a field of research and
development. Inclusion of biometrics leads to in-creasing cost and hardware in scheme, to reduce this
is still field of research. So that 3D password can be used in many application areas as discussed earlier
and also many more area other than those. Thus this paper tells about our study about 3D password,
still it is in early stage. Future work is needed in 3D password scheme to develop this scheme up to
more secure level. Implementing 3D password for mobile handset is the another important future work.

19
REFERENCE
1. http://www.seminartopics.in/computer%20seminar%20topics/3D-password.php
2. https://www.slideshare.net/manisha0902/3d-password-ppt-43870131
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sP7TawXAUg
4. http://research.ijcaonline.org/icacact/number1/icacact1002.pdf
5. http://www.ijesit.com/Volume%202/Issue%202/IJESIT201302_16.pdf
6. http://research.ijcaonline.org/volume120/number7/pxc3904024.pdf

SEMINAR REPORT ON 3D PASSWORD

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to SEMINAR REPORT ON 3D PASSWORD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

SEMINAR REPORT ON 3D PASSWORD