Spirituality in the lives of African Americans

A RELATIONAL FRAMEWORK
FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGIOSITY
AND SPIRITUALITY IN THE LIVES
OF AFRICAN AMERICANS
Jacqueline S. Mattis
New York University
Robert J. Jagers
Howard University
Ⅲ
Religiosity and spirituality are defining features of African American life.
However, within psychology, research on African American religiosity and
spirituality has proceeded without benefit of a conceptual framework. This
paper labors toward a framework that examines the roles of religion and
spirituality in the development and maintenance of social relationships.
We review empirical research on the role of religion and spirituality in the
lives of African Americans with an eye toward illuminating the affective,
cognitive, and behavioral mechanisms through which religion and
spirituality shape individual, family, and communal relationships across
the developmental span. Future directions for quantitative and qualitative
research on African American religious and spiritual life are suggested.
© 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Historically, religion and spirituality have been at the center of African American
community life and folk experience ~Billingsley & Caldwell, 1991; Frazier, 1962; Long,
1997; Taylor & Chatters, 1991!. However, within the social sciences, research on the
role of religion and spirituality in the lives of African Americans has remained limited
and disjointed. Some attention has been given to the study of African American
Christian churches. Much of this research has focused on these churches’ roles in
meeting service needs that have been abdicated by other service institutions ~Billings-
ley & Caldwell, 1991!. Some studies have explored patterns of religious involvement
among African Americans ~Chatters, Levin, & Taylor, 1992; Chatters & Taylor, 1989;
Correspondence to: Jacqueline S. Mattis, Department of Applied Psychology, School of Education, New
York University, 239 Greene Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10003.
A R T I C L E
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 29, No. 5, 519–539 (2001)
© 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Levin, Taylor, & Chatters, 1995; Taylor & Chatters, 1991!. Others have focused on the
mediating effects of religion on psychological ~Williams, Larson, Buckler, Heckmann
& Pyle, 1991; McAdoo, 1995! and physical health ~Wallace & Williams, 1997!. However,
little empirical attention has been given to the functions of religion and spirituality in
the everyday lives of African American people. As such, although sociological and
psychological research can cogently argue that religion and spirituality are important
in the lives of African Americans, these disciplines can say little about why religion and
spirituality are important, or about their roles in structuring daily affairs.
Further, within psychology, research on African American religiosity and spiritu-
ality has proceeded without benefit of a conceptual framework. This paper labors
toward such a framework. Of particular concern is the development of a framework
that examines the role of religion and spirituality in the development and mainte-
nance of social relationships. This paper has three points of focus: First, we discuss the
utility of a conceptual framework that explores the role of religion and spirituality in
relational life. Second, we provide a brief treatment of prevailing empirical literature
on the functions of religion and spirituality. We focus particular attention on critically
appraising the small body of research on the psychological functions of religion and
spirituality in the lives of African Americans. We are concerned both with the con-
ceptual and methodological aspects of these studies. Finally, we situate the discussion
of existing literature on African American religiosity and spirituality in a relational
matrix. In doing so we highlight the affective, cognitive, and behavioral mechanisms
through which religion and spirituality may function in interpersonal relationships
across the developmental span. Using this relational framework, we suggest specific
future directions for the quantitative and qualitative study of African American reli-
gious and spiritual life.
THE SIGNIFICANCE AND UTILITY
OF A RELATIONAL FRAMEWORK
Although religion and spirituality appear to be reemerging in mainstream psychology,
much of the work in this arena continues to be concerned with individual quests. This
focus on the individual has obscured attention to the powerful ways in which religion
and spirituality guide and influence relational life. Certainly, sociologists and social
psychologists have asserted that religion and spirituality play a role in the search for
intimacy ~Geertz, 1989; Houf, 1945!. However, these assertions have been examined
almost exclusively in the context of macro-level relationships ~i.e., the constellation of
individuals into cultural groups!. Our goal in this work is to articulate a conceptual
framework that will focus attention on the ways in which religion and spirituality
operate within everyday interpersonal relationships. Of particular concern here is the
development of a framework that examines the role of religion and spirituality in the
relationships of African Americans ~see Figure 1!.
The conceptual framework offered in this paper emerges out of a fundamental
assumption that religion and spirituality are relational phenomena. The very act of
believing in God places one in relationship with, and immediately invites reflection
on one’s connections and obligations to, this Other ~e.g., God!. Because we are broadly
concerned with relationships, we use this framework to highlight the complex roles of
religion and spirituality in social interactions within and across multiple levels of
human ecology ~e.g., individual, family, and community0 society!. We do not assume
that religion and spirituality operate in the same ways across the developmental span.
520 • Journal of Community Psychology, September 2001

As such, we advocate for rigorous empirical research on the complex functions of
religion and spirituality at the various stages of development. We also advocate for
attention to early and lifelong religious and spiritual socialization processes. We also
recognize that religion and spirituality may not operate in the same ways for men and
women, or for people from different cultural, regional, and class backgrounds within
the African American community. As such, we highlight the need for attention to the
ways in which these factors shape the religious and spiritual lives and the relationships
of African American men and women.
Our relational framework focuses attention on the process of religious and spiri-
tual socialization. In that regard, it attends to the roles of socializing agents ~e.g.,
mothers, fathers, extended family members, peers! in the transmission and mainte-
nance of religious and spiritual values within and across generations. Equally impor-
tant, the framework is concerned with the mechanisms by which religious and spiritual
socialization occur.
In addition, this relational framework highlights the affective, cognitive, and behav-
ioral correlates of religious and spiritual experience. We insist that religion and spir-
ituality both stimulate and operate through a range of affect, cognition, and behaviors.
As such, we are concerned with the links between religion, spirituality, and such
experiences as guilt, anxiety, altruism, hope, happiness, forgiveness, trust, love, the
search for relational commitment, the search for personal significance, the construc-
tion of a sense of community, and involvement in acts that promote social justice. The
significance of these affective, cognitive, and behavioral states for the relationships of
African American people is examined. Finally, we are interested in relational out-
comes. These outcomes include but are not limited to relationship quality, relational
commitment, and relationship selection ~e.g., partner and friendship choice!.
An important caveat is needed here. In this paper we take a deliberately positive
bent toward religion. Certainly, history provides us with ample evidence of the ways in
which religion has been misused by European Americans to legitimize oppression,
domination and other negative practices. In addition, religion has been misused by
African Americans to promote patriarchal and class domination within the African
American community ~Baer, 1993; Higginbotham, 1993; Ozorak, 1996!. However, despite
these misuses of religion, we insist that the principles of religions are focused on
promoting positive interactions between individuals. There is abundant anecdotal as well
as empirical evidence of the ways in which religion and spirituality have been used to
Figure 1. Conceptual framework for study of religion and spirituality in relational life.
Religiosity and Spirituality in the Lives of African Americans • 521

promote positive life outcomes. Given our interest in normative development, we elect
to focus our attention on these more positive functions of religion and spirituality.
THE FUNCTIONS OF RELIGION
IN EVERYDAY LIFE
“Religiosity” and “spirituality” are distinct but confluent domains of human life. The
similarities between religion and spirituality have inspired active debate about the
meanings of these terms, and about the extent to which they name the same or
different experiences. To date there is no scholarly consensus on their meanings, and
no agreement about the strategies that would allow us to effectively assess their respec-
tive roles in everyday life ~Mattis, 2000; Zinnbauer et al., 1997!.
In this paper, we define “religion” as a shared system of beliefs, mythology, and
rituals associated with a god or gods. “Religiosity,” by extension, is defined as an
individual’s degree of adherence to the beliefs, doctrines and practices of a religion.
Following from the definitions offered by Jagers and Smith ~1996! and Mattis ~2000!,
we use the term “spirituality” to refer to “an acknowledgement of a non-material force
that permeates all affairs, human and non-human.” Using these definitions as points
of departure, we argue that religion is one, but by no means the only, practical
manifestation of spiritual life. We note that within the secular realm of African Amer-
ican culture there are folk beliefs and traditions that suggest that spiritual forces play
an active role in the world of the living. Such a secular spiritual orientation can exist
apart from religious beliefs and practices.
Many psychologists have dismissed religion and spirituality as inadequate strat-
egies for defending the psyche from anxiety, fear and existential angst ~see, e.g.,
Freud, 1961!. Recently scholars in psychology have challenged this narrow and reduc-
tive vision of religion and spirituality ~see Pargament & Park, 1995!. Despite these
recent challenges, psychology’s appreciation of the functions of religion and spiritu-
ality continues to lag behind that of other disciplines. With a few notable exceptions
~e.g., Shweder, Much, Mahapatra, & Park, 1997!, psychologists have failed to integrate
scholarship from other disciplines ~e.g., theology and anthropology! into our under-
standing of the meanings and functions of religious and spiritual experience. This
failure has seriously hampered efforts to illuminate the complex functions of religion
and spirituality in everyday experience.
In an effort to develop a meaningful and complex picture of the functions of
religion and spirituality in the lives of African-American men and women, our present
analysis integrates some early work in social science. Houf ~1945! outlined several
functions of religion. He asserted that religion assures individuals of superhuman
help; helps to negotiate periods of crisis; portrays the nature and problem of evil;
offers a path to salvation; integrates personality by providing opportunities to under-
stand the meaning of life, and to gain mastery over self; shapes individual and group
life; and supports sound moral values. Geertz ~1973! adds that religion also provides
individuals with a shared world view that they can come to experience as persuasive
and meaningful.
Work conducted in Black theology over the past three decades further extends
and challenges our understandings of the functions of religion. Many African Amer-
ican theologians have argued that African American theology has been shaped by the
social and political contexts within which it emerged ~Cone, 1986; Grant, 1989!.
African American religiosity, Cone argues, is thematically and existentially concerned

with questions of oppression, and with the quest for liberation, love, hope, and justice.
Although some have wisely cautioned against accepting essentialist and simplistic
visions of African American identity and African American religious life ~Anderson,
1995!, the arguments proffered by liberation theologians warrant attention.
In addition to their thematic concerns with liberation, love, hope, and justice,
African American religions have developed particularized visions of both the relation-
ship between humans and God0Allah and the mission of believers ~Cone, 1986; Grant,
1989; Lincoln, 1997; Long, 1997!. In African American Christian and Muslim tradi-
tions, God, Christ, and Allah are seen as champions of the oppressed, and as symbols
of victory over oppression. By appropriating the trickster figure popular in African
and African American folk culture, and by envisioning God and Christ as tricksters
and usurpers, religious African Americans remind themselves and each other of the
prospect of “making a way out of no way” ~Long, 1997!. Calling upon this trickster
sensibility, African Americans have used their religious and spiritual convictions to
subvert White, racist, and patriarchal hegemony; construct subjectively meaningful
personal, racial, and gender identities; reify their humanity; agitate for social justice;
and maintain a sense of community ~Long, 1997; McKay, 1989!. Further, African
American religiosity and worship traditions emphasize both a profound sense of inti-
macy with the divine, and a horizontal extension of that intimacy into the human
community ~Carter, 1976; Costen, 1993; McKay, 1989!. The importance of relationship
and intimacy in African American religiosity is evident in penetrating examinations of
traditional African American liturgical styles, styles of communal worship, prayer, and
call-and-response musical traditions ~Carter, 1976; Costen, 1993!. However, psycholo-
gists largely have failed to situate African American religiosity and spirituality in an
explicitly relational framework. As such, we have missed the opportunity to examine
the ways in which religion and spirituality help to structure African Americans rela-
tionships with God, each other, European Americans, and with others in society.
Individual-Level Factors That Promote Relationships
Much of the research on the functions of religion and spirituality has focused on their
roles in “self”-centered pursuits. In addition, much of this work has focused on the
role of religion and spirituality in the lives of adults. Despite these limitations we
endeavor here to take a life-span approach in our review of research on the individual-
level functions of religion and spirituality.
Early theorists in psychology, including G. Stanley Hall and Erik Erikson, identi-
fied religion as a central force in childhood and adolescence, and argued that reli-
gious conflicts, and efforts to resolve those conflicts, are key to adolescent identity
development ~Youniss, 1992; Wulff, 1991!. However, empirical research in psychology
generally has ignored the powerful role of religion and spirituality in child and
adolescent development. Those researchers who have examined the role of religion
and spirituality in the lives of young people have found that, among adolescents,
religion and spirituality promote personal well-being and mitigate against negative
behaviors and outcomes. Religiosity is negatively related to substance abuse, early
sexual involvement, delinquent behavior, suicidality, and risky health behaviors among
adolescents ~for reviews, see Donahue & Benson, 1995; Wallace & Williams, 1997!.
These findings are consistent with the findings of research conducted with African
American youth. Empirical research suggests that internalized religious and spiritual
values may be crucial to the prevention of antisocial behaviors and the promotion of

positive social attitudes and behaviors among these youth. In their work with a sample
of sixth-grade, urban-residing African American youth, Jagers and Mock ~1993! found
that a spiritual orientation was associated with fewer reported acts of delinquency, and
with an increased focus on such prosocial values as cooperation, empathy, and justice.
Stevenson ~1997! and Stevenson, Herrero-Taylor, and Cameron ~in press! have found
that African American adolescent males who hear, and presumably internalize, mes-
sages about religion and spirituality tend to engage in greater levels of anger control
and fewer acts of overt aggression than their counterparts. These findings suggest that
religion and spirituality play roles in adolescents’ efforts to achieve emotional and
behavioral self-regulation, particularly in times of interpersonal conflict. Taken together,
the work of Jagers and Stevenson and their colleagues suggests that beyond their roles
in mitigating antisocial responses, religion and spirituality play crucial roles in pro-
moting prosocial attitudes and behaviors among African American youth.
Research conducted with predominately White participants has shown that reli-
gion plays a role in the promotion of individual physical ~Dull & Skokan, 1995!, and
emotional health ~Ventis, 1995!. Religion and spirituality also have been found to
promote personal well-being and to mediate negative outcomes for African American
adults. For example, Blaine and Crocker ~1995! report religious salience to be posi-
tively associated with psychological well-being among African American college stu-
dents. Importantly, it appears that this relationship may be partially mediated by
respondents’ belief in the life-enhancing meaning of God and self-affirming religious
affiliations. Religiosity also has been found to be negatively associated with symptoms
of psychological distress among African American women ~Handal, Black-Lopez, &
Moergen, 1989!. It appears that religion may affect well-being by providing concrete
strategies for coping with distress and adversity ~Knox, 1985; McAdoo, 1995; Neigh-
bors, Jackson, Bowman, & Gurin, 1983!, and by providing real and0or perceived
emotional and moral support ~Maton, 1989; McAdoo, 1995!.
In addition to their role in coping, religion and spirituality have been theorized to
play a part in the development of prosocial attitudes and behaviors among adults.
However, empirical research on the link between religiosity, kindness, and prosocial
orientation among European American adults has yielded mixed results ~Batson &
Ventis, 1982!. The inconsistencies in the findings of these studies owe, in part, to the
range of ways in which researchers define and measure religiosity. It also is notewor-
thy that these studies typically have relied on European American samples, a fact that
inspires serious questions about the extent to which their findings are generalizable to
African Americans. However, in one of the few studies of kindness and prosocial
orientation of African American adults, interviewers involved in the data collection
phase of the National Survey on Black Americans were asked to assess the congeniality
of respondents. Ellison found that highly religious African American men and women,
and those who engaged in frequent private devotional activities ~e.g., prayer!, tended
to be perceived by interviewers as more open and cooperative, less suspicious, and
more congenial than less religious individuals ~Ellison, 1992!. Likewise, individuals
who reported that religion and spirituality influenced their daily lives and their per-
sonal behaviors were rated as friendlier and less hostile than their counterparts. The
characteristics associated with these more religious African American people are qual-
ities that are promotive of positive interpersonal relationships.
Psychologists have failed to attend closely to the affective and cognitive correlates
of religiosity and spirituality. Generally, it has been assumed that religion and spiri-
tuality serve to reduce “negative” and0or uncomfortable affect ~e.g., fear and anxiety!

and to achieve “freedom from worry and guilt” ~Freud, 1961; Houf, 1945; Ventis,
1995!. Indeed, empirical research on coping confirms that religion and spirituality
mitigate fear, anxiety, frustration, depression, and hopelessness ~Lupfer, Tolliver, &
Jackson, 1996; Pargament, 1997!. However, this affect-modulation approach to reli-
gious and spiritual life ignores the reality that although religion and spirituality may
serve to mitigate uncomfortable affect in some situations, they increase those affective
states under other conditions. Further, although increased feelings of fear, guilt, and
worry have been treated as negative effects of religious and spiritual life, it must be
appreciated that these and other affective states can and do prompt individuals to
move away from self-absorption, and to adapt prosocial attitudes and behaviors. For
example, research has shown that guilt is an important ingredient in young children’s
moral development ~Kochanska, 1991!. Guilt is associated with mutually beneficial
intentions, willingness to make reparations, and to engage in nonhostile, constructive
discourse ~Tangey, Wagner, Hill-Barlow, Marscall & Gramzow, 1996!. Recent research
highlights important roles for a gamut of other affective correlates. For example, Jagers
~1997! has focused on empathy as an important correlate of religious and spiritual life.
Further, in a qualitative study of the functions of religion and spirituality in the everyday
lives of African American women, Mattis ~2001b! found that religion and spirituality in-
spired a range of affect including happiness, love, hope, peace, calm, faith, pride, shame,
humility, guilt, optimism, strength, courage, confidence, trust, and forgiveness.
The cognitive and behavioral correlates of religiosity and spirituality also deserve
empirical attention. For example, attention must be paid to the role of religion and
spirituality in the personal search for meaning and significance ~Burris, Jackson,
Tarpley & Smith, 1996; Ellison, 1983; Pargament, 1997!. Religious and spiritual expe-
riences are characterized, in part, by efforts to grapple with the sacred, and to extend
that sense of sacredness into human relationships ~Pargament, 1997!. However, empir-
ical research has not examined the link between religion, spirituality, sacredness, and
the development of African American people’s interpersonal relationships. Mattis
~2001b! notes that critical self-reflection, personal growth, self-definition, and reflec-
tions of life purpose, destiny, social responsibility, justice, and the search for signifi-
cance are also crucial areas for future research on the cognitive implications of
religion and spirituality. The behavioral correlates of religion and spirituality include
such prosocial behaviors as altruism, caring, honesty, modulation of affect, respect,
self-sacrifice, and achievement. Connections between religion and spirituality and
prosocial attitudes, emotions, and behaviors among African American children and
adults remain to be systematically examined.
Although much of the existing research in the psychology of religion has used the
individual as the unit of interest, it must be appreciated that the positive psychological
and social outcomes achieved by individuals emerge out of their relationship with a
Higher Power ~e.g., God!, or other humans. Religion and spirituality both shape and
are shaped by the interactions of individuals with others. As such, the dynamic inter-
play between religion, spirituality, affect, cognition, behavior, and relational life deserves
empirical attention.
FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
Family provides the primary context for the cultivation of religious and spiritual life.
It is in the family that children first learn religious values. It is also in the context of
family relationships that children have their first opportunities to observe and practice

the relational values that we believe are inherent in religion and spirituality. The
importance of the link between family and religious life is also evident in the language
used by African American believers. For example, the African American community
thrives on such aphorisms as “the family that prays together stays together.” Further,
African Americans frequently refer to importance of having a “church family.” Despite
the obvious importance of religion and spirituality to African American families, the
available empirical research on the role of religion and spirituality in African Amer-
ican family life has been conceptually and0or methodologically limited. As such, within
psychology we know virtually nothing about the ways in which religion and spirituality
function to sustain the integrity of African American family life. We also know virtually
nothing about the process by which religious and spiritual values are cultivated and0or
maintained within African American families. Although little is known about the
substantive functions of religion and spirituality in everyday family life, we review a
cross-section of the available research in order to develop a snapshot of the roles of
religion and spirituality in African American family functioning.
Using data on a national probability sample of African Americans, Taylor and
Chatters ~1991! found that married African American people tend to report greater
levels of involvement in organizational and private devotional activities than unmar-
ried individuals. Married men and women are also more likely to report that religion
is important to them and to identify themselves as more religious than their unmar-
ried counterparts. Scanzoni ~1971! found that for African Americans the church and
religion had a number of family-relevant functions. The church and religion reinforce
parents’ moral values, give meaning to marriage and family, reinforce values related to
the role obligations of spouses, and outline criteria regarding mate selection; and the
church provides a venue in which individuals can meet potential life-partners.
More recent empirical research has examined the link between religious involve-
ment and family outcomes. For example, Brody, Stoneman, Flor, and McCrary ~1994!
found that parental involvement in formal, organizational religious activity was pre-
dictive of positive family outcomes, including positive parent–youth relationships.
Maternal religiosity was associated with lower levels of inconsistent parenting, lower
levels of marital conflict, better quality of marital interaction, and higher levels of
support to their spouses regarding child rearing and care giving. Paternal religiosity
was related to positive youth outcomes. However, this relationship was mediated by
men’s relationships with their spouses. Within African American families religion also
serves as a cultural resource that mitigates against male provider role-strain ~Bowman,
1990!. That is, highly religious families tend to be more understanding and more
supportive of men who are unemployed or underemployed. In sum, religion plays a
role in maintaining positive relationships within nuclear families.
Religion also plays an important role in the lives of unmarried women, including
unmarried mothers. In a qualitative study, McAdoo ~1995! asked a sample of single
African American mothers to specify the role of religion in family life. These women
reported that religion provided emotional support, moral support, fostered family
unity, helped by just being there, and provided answers to prayers. Although McAdoo
and others have explored the role of religion in nontraditional ~e.g., non-nuclear
families!, scholars generally have not taken into account that African American defi-
nitions of family extend beyond sanguinal lines of kinship. As such, the extent to
which these functions of religion and spirituality hold for other caregivers ~e.g.,
grandparents, godparents, and fictive kin! within African American families has not
been systematically explored.

Since many African Americans employ relatively fluid definitions of family we
would be remiss if we failed to consider the African-American Christian church’s role
in creating proxies for family relationships. The oppressive social and political condi-
tions faced by African Americans have radically altered both African American family
structure and the traditions and patterns of social obligation that guided African
American family life ~Gilkes, 1997!. African American religious institutions have responded
to this assault by deliberately replicating family structure, kinship obligations, and
authority. Within the African American Christian tradition, this replication has been
achieved, in part, through the elevation of older women to the role of church and
community mothers ~Brown, 1994; Gilkes, 1997!.
“Church mothers” serve crucial functional as well as symbolic roles within African
American religious and secular communities. Church mothers extend their influence
into institutional life as well as into the personal lives of individuals in the church and
secular communities. These women also serve as repositories of church and commu-
nity tradition, dispense advice to men, women, and children, and proffer values that
are intended to maintain family, institutional, and community cohesion. Finally, they
serve as representatives of traditional systems of authority, wisdom, and respect within
the community and “church family.” Gilkes ~1997, p. 369! argues that “the actuarial
realities of Black life are such that elderly Black women provide the continuity nec-
essary to promote unity in the face of ever-changing historical conditions.” In short,
church mothers may serve not only as symbolic heads of churches, and of families
within those churches, but they play crucial roles in maintaining family and communal
integrity. Brown ~1994! asserts that the roles played by women in the church allow
them to avoid competing with male leadership, and thus help men to attain elevated
status in broader society. Men, on the other hand, support women’s prestige in the
home and church. Brown believes this to be consistent with African-derived male–
female complimentary relations.
Through their outreach programs churches play both direct and indirect roles in
African American family life. Billingsley and Caldwell ~1991! found that 51% of the
churches involved in their national survey of churches have ongoing family outreach
programs, and 31% provide services to children and youth. These churches provide
financial assistance, food, shelter, clothing, medical care, child care, counseling, and
other forms of instrumental support to families ~Billingsley, 1992; Billingsley & Cald-
well, 1991; Caldwell, Chatters, Billingsley, & Taylor, 1995!. It is clear that churches
both replicate key aspects of African American family structure and take on roles that
directly and indirectly influence the well-being of families.
No discussion of the role of religion and spirituality in family life would be
complete without an exploration of religion and spiritual socialization. Given the lack
of empirical attention to spiritual socialization, we confine our discussion largely to
religious socialization. Jagers has found that preadolescent youth who perceive their
families to be spiritual, and those who attend church, tend to score higher on mea-
sures of spiritual orientation than children from less spiritual families. It appears that
mothers play a particularly crucial role in the religious socialization of children. For
example, Taylor and Chatters ~1991! have found maternal religious affiliation to be a
uniquely important predictor of the religious affiliation of African American adults.
No systematic attention has been given to the role of fathers, siblings or extended
“family” members ~e.g., grandparents and godparents! in the religious and spiritual
development of African American children. However, Mattis ~1997! has found that
socializing agents outside of the family ~e.g., pastors, teachers, and church-involved

adults! play crucial roles in the early religious and spiritual development of African
Americans. Taken together these findings clearly suggest that religious and spiritual
socialization happens in a broad relational context. However, research is silent about
the process through which children and youth come to embrace religious and spiri-
tual values, and0or patterns of religious affiliation. Research is also silent about the
ways in which religious socialization proceeds across the various stages of development.
As we attend to the religious and spiritual socialization of African Americans, we
must consider putative gender differences in religiosity and spirituality. Gender dif-
ferences in religious involvement are ubiquitous in empirical research ~Taylor & Chat-
ters, 1991!. Mattis ~1997! has identified gender differences in the early religious
socialization of African American college students. African-American women are more
likely than men to have participated in religious services and activities early in life.
The age of onset of these gender differences, and the reasons for such early differ-
ences in formal religious involvement, have yet to be explored. However, it is possible
that, as their children move into adolescence, African American parents, families, and
communities may be particularly insistent that girls and young women be involved in
the church. It is equally plausible that churches provide activities that are more
appealing to and more fulfilling for young women than for young men.
It is reasonable to raise questions about the long-term implications of such differ-
ences in early religious involvement. It might be speculated that these uneven patterns
of involvement contribute to gender differences in religious salience and commitment
in adulthood. The ubiquity of empirical findings that African American women score
higher than their male counterparts on such conventional measures of religion and
spirituality as religious salience, commitment, and involvement can be seen to support
this notion ~see Caldwell et al., 1995; Taylor & Chatters, 1991!. However, Mattis ~1997!
found that, despite differences in early religious involvement, African American men
and women did not differ in their reports of the importance of religion in their early
lives, nor did they differ in reports of the importance of religion in their current lives.
While the process of religious and spiritual socialization remains unclear, these
forms of socialization have clear significance for positive psychological development.
Youth who perceive their families to be communal, spiritual, and affective tend to be
more empathic, engage in greater levels of perspective-taking, and participate in fewer
acts of aggression than their counterparts ~ Jagers, 1997!. It is possible that parents
who are religiously and0or spiritually oriented may focus particular attention on teach-
ing their children the qualities associated with good character. These parents may also
focus on teaching their children how to read and respond effectively to internal and
external affective and social cues. As such, these children may be particularly effective
at affective self-monitoring and peer selection. Further, parents who are religious, or
who are involved in church-related activities, and those who involve their children in
such activities, may avail themselves of social support networks composed of people
who share and perhaps reinforce crucial values, beliefs. and commitments. These
relationships may provide the contexts, the tools, and the opportunities needed to
actualize and reinforce religiously and spiritually consistent values and behaviors.
COMMUNITY AND SOCIETAL-LEVEL
RELATIONAL FUNCTIONS
Sociologists traditionally have asserted that the principal functions of religion are to
organize people into cohesive social groups and to maintain the order necessary to

preserve group life ~Durkheim, 1915; Geertz, 1989!. Consistent with this approach is
the notion that religion and spirituality create community by generating a cohesive,
persuasive, and unifying worldview. Here Geertz ~1973! is worth citing at length: “In
religious belief and practice a group’s ethos is rendered intellectually reasonable by
being shown to represent a way of life ideally adapted to the state of affairs the
world-view describes, while the world-view is rendered emotionally convincing by
being presented as an image of an actual state of affairs peculiarly well-arranged to
accommodate such a way of life” ~pp. 89–90!. In short, religion creates a sense of unity
by cognitively and affectively validating individual, group, and cultural beliefs about
the nature of the religious as well as secular worlds.
Although this perspective seems cogent, its tenets have not been systematically
examined in empirical research. A number of individuals have theorized the retention
of Africanisms in African American cultural and spiritual world views ~ Jules-Rosette,
1980!, and others have argued that spirituality remains a core domain of African
American cultural life ~ Jagers & Mock, 1993!. These theories have received some
empirical support; however, the enculturative and acculturative processes by which
these worldviews might be transmitted within the African American community remain
unclear. Further, little is known about the mechanisms by which such worldviews
might come to be experienced as affectively or cognitively persuasive.
The value of religion and spirituality extends beyond their role~s! in the trans-
mission of persuasive, community-cohering worldviews. Anecdotal and limited empir-
ical evidence suggests that religion and spirituality also help to shape people’s ideas
about who comprises their community. As children mature, they gain an expanded
understanding of the meaning of intimacy and come to define community in increas-
ingly abstract and global ways. They extend their sense of intimacy to other adults,
peers, acquaintances, and to strangers within the proximal and global community with
whom they may never have direct contact. Many African Americans come to experi-
ence God, Satan, ancestors ~i.e., deceased relatives!, and other spirits ~e.g., religious
saints! as a part of the extended community ~Nelson, 1997!. These nonmaterial spirits
are believed to be actively involved in the day-to-day, lived experience of individuals
~Nelson, 1997!. That is, they are seen as having protective as well as destructive
intentions and powers, and are believed to share knowledge with those who are living.
Religion and spirituality have been associated with the cultivation and mainte-
nance of a “sense of community” ~see Sarason, 1974 for a discussion of sense of
community!. Jagers ~1997! found a strong positive correlation between spiritual ori-
entation and communal orientation in samples of fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade
African American students, and among college-age African Americans ~ Jagers & Smith,
1996!. These findings suggest that spirituality is associated with a sense of connected-
ness to others including extended family, neighbors, and peers. This real or perceived
connection to others, particularly to church-involved others, has been shown to enhance
the well-being of adolescents ~Maton & Wells, 1995!.
Within the African American community religious institutions use religious and
spiritual values to promote this sense of connectedness, and to shape individuals’
understanding of their moral obligation to the community ~and to society at large!.
For African American believers, participation in socially responsible actions histori-
cally has been an important marker of authentic religious commitment. In addition,
African American churches historically have acted on their own sense of moral obli-
gation by providing for the social, educational, medical, and economic needs of com-
munities ~Billingsley & Caldwell, 1991; Dodson & Townsend-Gilkes, 1986; Moore, 1991!.

In fact, Chaves and Higgins ~1992! found that African American churches tend to be more
involved in social service and social justice activities than their White counterparts.
“Church work” ~i.e., visiting the sick and shut-in, feeding the poor and0or elderly!
traditionally has provided African Americans with crucial opportunities to understand
and experience the realities of interdependence and to engage in activities that
promote community well-being ~Ward, 1995!. Individuals involved in “church work”
are encouraged to identify with biblical models of unselfishness and care. In that vein,
they are impelled to consider the plight of the disadvantaged and dispossessed, to
think critically about the uneven distribution of social and material resources, and to
play an active role in the fight for social justice. Ward asserts that children who do not
participate in such prosocial activities, and who exist in social contexts that value
independence over interdependence, and personal well-being over social responsibil-
ity, are at increased risk for engaging in aggressive and otherwise antisocial behaviors.
Private devotional activities ~e.g., prayer! may also play a part in the cultivation of
a sense of community. Among African Americans intercessory prayers—prayers offered
on behalf of others—play particularly important roles in achieving and maintaining a
sense of community. However, those familiar with African American religious life are
aware that, through prayer, individuals frequently ask for God’s intercession into
family affairs, friendships, relationships with co-workers and acquaintances, and all
aspects of community life. Asking for and0or offering intercessory prayer is an act of
intimacy and relational commitment. Such prayers are considered important in secur-
ing community and individual well-being. Intercessory prayers have been shown to
have health promotive effects for the subjects of such prayers ~McCullough, 1995!.
However, to date, research has not adequately explored the role of prayer, including
intercessory prayer, in such relational ends as the cultivation of trust and commit-
ment, or in perceived support.
The role of the religion in African American community empowerment and social
action must be considered here. Maton and Pargament ~1987! identify several path-
ways by which religion can influence communities and society at large. These path-
ways include conservation of the social order, social service, social conversion, social
avoidance, social sanctuary, and deliberate outreach, prevention, and promotion efforts.
Maton and Pargament asserted that religious institutions and religious individuals
generally have been seen as socially conservative. These institutions and individuals,
they argued, tend to resist social change and tend to work to preserve the status quo.
Scholars following in this tradition have accused African American religious institu-
tions and religious leaders of encouraging avoidance and escapism rather than activ-
ism among African Americans ~Frazier, 1962; Myrdal, 1944!. However, a more careful
analysis of empirical as well as archival data reveals a more complex picture.
A range of political and religious ideologies have always existed and operated
within African American religious and secular communities. As such, African Ameri-
can political history has been a synthesis of acquiescence and radicalism. Through
radical rereadings of biblical text and biblical history, African American religious
leaders have inspired the community to reject and subvert oppressive social, political,
and economic conditions ~Cone, 1986; McKay, 1989!. In addition, the tenets of reli-
gion have been used to distinguish between the nominal “Christianity” practiced by
slaveholders and oppressors, and the “true Christianity” practiced by those who gen-
uinely internalize the substantive values professed by the church, and represented in
the life of Christ. This strategy is clearly evident in a critique offered by Frederick
Douglass ~1985! in an address delivered in 1845:

What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the
slave-holding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Chris-
tianity proper? We have men-stealers for ministers, women-whippers for mis-
sionaries, and cradle-plunderers for church members. The man who wields
the blood-clotted cowskin during the week fills the pulpit on Sunday, and
claims to be a minister of the meek and lowly Jesus.
They attend with Pharisaical strictness to the outward form of religion, and at
the same time neglect the weightier matters of the law, judgement, mercy and
faith. ~pp. 104–106!
Douglass’ critique anticipates Allport’s distinction between extrinsic ~e.g., public! and
intrinsic ~e.g., internal! religious orientation. However, it also uses religion both to
highlight the immorality of race, class and gender hegemony, and to problematize
America’s professed identity as a free and Christian nation.
Religious leaders, cognizant of their moral responsibilities, have often used moral
suasion to advance peaceful struggles for liberation ~Clayton, 1995!. However, among
African Americans religion also has been used to inspire militant revolutionary action.
In his exploration of the link between antebellum religion and insurgency, Harding
~1997! notes that enslaved men and women employed religious symbols and texts to
inspire armed resistance. Calling on the iconography of Old Testament religion, these
men and women imagined themselves as New Israelites who were living in exile in a
strange land where they were subject to pervasive injustice and brutal oppression.
These New Israelites lived with the conviction that they were soldiers, and that their
God would ultimately grant them victory in their ~literal! wars for justice and equality.
Religious African Americans hold a complex set of beliefs about the relationship
between religion and rebellion. Religious faith was not, and is not, seen as necessarily
inconsistent with the rejection of unjust laws, or with the use of armed struggle
~Wilmore, 1986!. Although violence generally is eschewed by religious African Amer-
icans, violent resistance often is seen as justifiable when used in the service of righ-
teousness, justice, and liberation. This notion is underscored by liberation theologian
James Cone. In his 1986 essay, “Violence and Vengeance,” Cone notes: “The critical
issue for the Christians is not violence or non-violence but rather whose side we are
on in the struggle for freedom. I firmly believe the gospel demands that we take sides
with the victims and not with the oppressors. There is no third way, no neutral
position for the Christian” ~p. 74!. Here, Cone underscores the point that the rela-
tionship between God, Christians, and humans is a relationship that carries real
obligations and accountability. Christians have an obligation to acknowledge and fight
against injustice. From this perspective, social action and resistance are envisioned as
divine imperatives.
Religion and churches also play roles in less militant forms of African American
political empowerment. Although, early empirical research suggested that religiosity
impedes political participation among African Americans ~see Marx, 1967!, more recent
evidence complicates those early findings. This more recent body of work suggests
that in order to understand the link between religion, church experience and African
American political participation scholars must first distinguish between the myriad
kinds of African American churches. African American churches espouse a broad
range of messages. Some churches are adamant in their insistence that justice is to be
found in Heaven rather than here on earth. Other churches espouse deliberately

liberationist messages. There is ample empirical evidence that men and women who
attend churches that stress liberationist themes and0or the importance of civic respon-
sibility, are more likely to engage in activities that contribute to community empow-
erment ~Calhoun-Brown, 1996; Reese & Brown, 1995!. Calhoun-Brown refers to such
churches as “political churches.” Individuals in political churches are more likely to
vote, attend rallies, participate in boycotts, contact public officials, and engage in
other political activities.
Although some would assert that it is primarily the church’s moral arguments that
sway congregations to act, Calhoun-Brown ~1996! and Harris ~1994! advance a resource
mobilization approach to the church’s role in social action, see Mattis ~2001a!. African
American churches that mobilize tangible resources ~e.g., money to support political
candidates and activities!, as well as psychological resources ~e.g., political conscious-
ness and motivation!, tend to produce politically active members. Although men and
women in political churches often report that they do not necessarily trust the gov-
ernment, they are more likely to believe in the utility of political action, and more
likely to believe that political officials are concerned about what they think ~Calhoun-
Brown, 1996!. African American men and women who attend these kinds of churches
are more likely to have politicized identities ~Calhoun-Brown!. They have a strong
sense of racial identification ~Calhoun-Brown; Reese & Brown, 1995; Wilcox & Gomez,
1990!, are more sensitive to power imbalances between African Americans and Whites,
and tend to assign blame for the low status of African Americans to systemic forces
~e.g., government and institutional forces! rather than to individual factors ~Reese &
Brown, 1995!. Political churches provide mechanisms through which individuals may
demonstrate their communal commitments, acquire knowledge, develop skills, and
gain a sense of efficacy with regard to their efforts. Taken together, these studies point
to a pathway by which religion and political churches may affect the development of
what Zimmerman ~1995! describes as “empowered outcomes.” Liberationist churches
appear to affect political participation, in part, by promoting a sense of community
among African Americans, and by facilitating the intrapersonal, interactional, and
behavioral components of psychological empowerment.
Although many argue that African American churches are declining in their
significance, examinations of the political behavior of African Americans clearly dem-
onstrate that religion or African American churches continue to serve as the center of
social justice or political movements in the African American community ~Wilmore,
1986!. African American religious leaders continue to use the pulpit to educate and
inform African Americans about social, political, and economic issues affecting their
lives. These churches continue to play central roles in mobilizing voters and in pro-
viding tangible support for candidates. These findings provide a cogent testament of
the inseparability of religion, activism, and political participation for African Ameri-
can people.
We would be remiss if we did not pay some attention to methodological concerns.
Most empirical studies of religious and spiritual experience have relied upon cross-
sectional data and on small convenience samples. The National Survey on Black
Americans and the Monitoring the Future data sets are notable exceptions. Although
survey research can and does provide important information on religious attitudes
and behaviors, they, like all other research methods, are limited. Survey techniques, if
augmented with rigorous interview, observational, and ethnographic data collection
and data analysis techniques, can significantly advance the study of African American
religious and spiritual life. Further, there is a dire need for longitudinal studies of

religious and spiritual development. Multimethod and longitudinal strategies will be
useful to the extent that they permit us to examine the process by which religion
and spirituality shape multiple dimensions of relational life over the developmental
span.
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS
We begin our summary with an important question: Why has psychology done such a
poor job in studying the role of religion and spirituality in the lives of African Ameri-
cans? This question is crucial because it provides us with an opportunity to think clearly
about psychology’s treatment of African American people and its treatment of religious
and spiritual life. The question also allows us to examine the ways in which the field
must reposition itself if it is to do an effective job of examining African American life.
The answer to our question requires that we attend to four important points.
First, in its efforts to establish itself as a “legitimate” science, psychology has
reified the tendency to associate science with logic, and religion and spirituality with
irrationality. The rise of logical positivism and psychology’s narrow pursuit of empir-
icism have led many scholars to conclude that religion and spirituality are neither
appropriate nor important fodder for scientific study ~see West, 1993, for a discus-
sion!. Second, empirical research demonstrates that psychologists do not tend to be
particularly religious people, and in many cases tend to be antagonistic toward reli-
gion ~see Wulff, 1991!. As such many psychologists neither understand nor value the
profound ways in which religion and spirituality shape the lives of those millions of
Americans who do define themselves as religious and0or spiritual. Third, psychology
has become increasingly and almost exclusively concerned with the study of human
pathology. Normative human development receives relatively little attention in con-
temporary psychology research, and psychology is particularly silent about the norma-
tive development of African Americans. As a consequence, the constructs that are
central to religion in general, and to African American religious life specifically ~e.g.,
forgiveness, liberation, hope, love!, have little currency in psychology. Finally, the
social sciences ~and American society as a whole! historically have seen African Amer-
ican people in highly essentialized and grossly simplistic ways. There is very little
appreciation that the African American community comprises people of myriad cul-
tures, ideologies, attitudes, and experiences. These various factors have collectively
contributed to an ambivalent and simplistic approach to the study of African Ameri-
can religiosity and spirituality.
The reemergence of scholarly attention to religion and spirituality represents an
exciting and important shift in psychology. This reemergence occurs at a time when
crucial questions are being raised about the complex roles of culture, class, and other
social positionings in human experience, and when efforts are being made to both
explicate and ameliorate the effects of mainstream hegemonic dominance over the
content and direction of scholarship. This represents, then, a particularly exhilarating
time in which to rigorously study religious and spiritual life, particularly African
American religious and spiritual life. Given this unique opportunity, we must be careful
to avoid the pitfalls of previous efforts to study African American religiosity and spiri-
tuality. In particular, we must not define religiosity solely in terms of patterns of in-
volvement in formal and informal religious activities. We also must be careful not to reduce
the study of religion and spirituality to examinations of individual quests for comfort

and meaning, personal piety, and0or private mysticism. Finally, we must take care to avoid
simplistic ideas about the identity, beliefs, and values of African American believers.
The relational framework articulated in this paper highlights two overarching
areas of concern. First, it emphasizes the importance of identifying the role of religion
and spirituality in relationships within and across multiple domains of human ecology
~e.g., individual, family, community, and society!. The framework focuses attention on
the agents ~e.g., family members, peers! involved in the transmission and maintenance
of religious values within and across generations. The framework also accentuates the
need to identify the mechanisms by which this transmission occurs, and the extent to
which the roles and influence of socializing agents may change at various points in the
developmental span. Equally important, it attends to the role of religion and spiritu-
ality in the quest for social justice.
Second, this framework accentuates the need for attention to the affective, cog-
nitive, and behavioral correlates of religious and spiritual experience. Research on
religion and spirituality has attended to only a circumscribed range of affective,
cognitive, and behavioral variables. Absent from empirical discourse on the religious
and spiritual lives of African Americans is an examination of the broad range of
emotions, cognitions, and behaviors that are associated with religiosity and spiritual-
ity. This framework will permit us to explore the ways in which the various correlates
of religion and spirituality affect such outcomes as relational quality, commitment,
and resilience.
This relational framework has implications for programs of intervention and pre-
vention. Implicit in many preventive and interventive efforts is the notion that reli-
gious values can be used to transform the behavior of individuals ~e.g., gang members!
whose actions endanger the well-being of their families and0or community. However,
little is known about the process by which religious and spiritual values are transmitted
and internalized, or the specific process by which religious and spiritual values can be
used to transform behavior. In addition, little is known about the role of religion and
spirituality at various stages in the developmental span. It is reasonable to believe that,
at different points in development, key socializing agents and different beliefs may
lose or gain influence. Prevention and intervention programs that adapt a relational
focus must consider the ways in which religious and spiritual values are reinforced,
advanced, and0or challenged by relationships between family members, siblings, peers.
and significant others at different points in the developmental process. Only when we
understand the use of religion and spirituality within normal social relationships and
within normal development can we effectively strategize about their uses for prevent-
ing or intervening in antisocial behaviors, and0or for promoting prosocial attitudes
and actions. Because this framework is broadly concerned with the role of religion and
spirituality in relationships, it promises to have a powerful role in advancing our
knowledge of the ways in which churches and religious individuals may serve as
resources for addressing key social issues ~e.g., interpersonal violence, antisocial behav-
ior, and the maintenance of family integrity!.
We must be attentive to a bias in research on the religious and spiritual lives of
African Americans. Existing research focuses largely on the religious and spiritual
experiences of African American Christians. As such, we know little about the religious
and spiritual lives of African Americans who are Muslim or Buddhist or belong to
other faith communities. By attending to other religious traditions we will be able to
document the religious and spiritual heterogeneity that exists in the African American
community. Equally important, we will be poised to examine the ways in which various

religious and spiritual traditions, beliefs, and values influence relationships across the
various cultures that comprise the African American community.
At present, African American churches ~and church-involved individuals! are being
asked to play increasingly expansive roles in resolving social problems that threaten
the well-being of the African American community. The demands being placed on
churches, clergy, and church involved individuals often exceed the knowledge and
skill base of these individuals. Psychologists have a base of knowledge ~e.g., about
stress and trauma! and skills ~e.g., counseling and psychotherapeutic skills! that could
be of great use to churches. Likewise, churches and religious individuals have a vast
body of knowledge about the cultivation of morality, the promotion of prosocial
behaviors, and effective strategies for creating and sustaining community relation-
ships. The absence of a framework that synthesizes these two bodies of knowledge
unnecessarily limits psychology’s effectiveness in examining the lives and experiences
of African American believers, and the ability of religious institutions and religious
individuals to meet the needs of the community. Both outcomes are unacceptable.
REFERENCES
Anderson, V. ~1995!. Beyond ontological Blackness: An essay on African American religious and
cultural criticism. New York: Continuum Books.
Baer, H. ~1993!. The limited empowerment of women in Black spiritual churches: An alternative
vehicle to religious leadership. Sociology of Religion, 54, 65–82.
Batson, D., & Ventis, W. ~1982!. The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective.
Oxford University Press.
Billingsley, A. ~1992!. Climbing Jacob’s ladder: The enduring legacy of African American fam-
ilies. New York: Touchstone Books.
Billingsley, A., & Caldwell, C.H. ~1991!. The church, the family and the school in the African
American community. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 427–440.
Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. ~1995!. Religiousness, race and psychological well-being: Exploring
social psychological mediators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1031–1041.
Bowman, P. ~1990!. Coping with provider role strain: Adaptive cultural resources among Black
husband-fathers. Journal of Black Psychology, 16, 1–21.
Brody, G., Stoneman, Z., Flor, D., & McCrary, C. ~1994!. Religion’s role in organizing family
relationships: Family process in rural, two-parent African American families. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 56, 878–888.
Brown, A. ~1994!. Afro-Baptist women’s church and family roles: Transmitting Afro-centric
cultural values. Anthropological Quarterly, 67, 173–186.
Burris, C., Jackson, L., Tarpley, W., & Smith, G. ~1996!. Religion as quest: The self-directed
pursuit of meaning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1068–1076.
Caldwell, C., Chatters, L., Billingsley, A., & Taylor, R. ~1995!. Church-based support programs
for elderly Black adults: Congregational and clergy characteristics. In M. Kimble, S. McFadden,
J. Ellor, & J. Seeber ~Eds.!, Aging, spirituality and religion ~pp. 306–324!. Minneapolis, MN:
Fortress Press.
Calhoun-Brown, A. ~1996!. African American churches and political mobilization: The psycho-
logical impact of organizational resources. The Journal of Politics, 58, 935–953.
Carter, H. ~1976!. The prayer tradition of Black people. Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press.
Chatters, L., Levin, J., & Taylor, J. ~1992!. Antecedents and dimensions of religious involvement
among older Black adults. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 269–278.

Chatters, L., & Taylor, J. ~1989!. Age differences in religious participation among Black adults.
Journal of Gerontology, 44~5!, 183–189.
Chaves, M., & Higgins, L. ~1992!. Comparing the community involvement of Black and White
congregations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 425–440.
Clayton, O. ~1995!. The churches and social change: Accommodation, moderation, or protest.
Daedalus, 124, 101–117.
Cone, J. ~1986!. Speaking the truth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Costen, M. ~1993!. African American Christian worship. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
Dodson, J., & Townsend-Gilkes, C. ~1986!. Something within: Social change and collective
endurance in the sacred world of Black Christian women. In R. Reuther & R. Keller ~Eds.!,
Women and religion in America: Volume 3: 1900–1968. A documentary history ~pp. 477–
488!. New York: Harper & Row.
Donahue, M., & Benson, P. ~1995!. Religion and the well-being of adolescents. Journal of Social
Issues, 51, 145–160.
Douglass, F. ~1985!. Slaveholding religion and the Christianity of Christ. In M. Sernett ~Ed.!, Afro-
American religious history: A documentary witness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dull, V., & Skokan, L. ~1995!. A cognitive model of religion’s influence on health. Journal of
Social Issues, 51~2!, 49–64.
Durkheim, E. ~1915!. The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
Ellison, C. ~1983!. Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychol-
ogy and Theology, 11, 330–340.
Ellison, C. ~1992!. Are religious people nice people? Evidence from the National Survey on
Black Americans. Social Forces, 71, 411–430.
Frazier, E. ~1962!. The Negro church in America. New York: Schocken Books.
Freud, S. ~1961!. The future of an illusion. New York: W.W. Norton.
Geertz, C. ~1973!. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. ~1989!. Religion. In A. Lehmann & J. Myers ~Eds.!, Magic, witchcraft and religion: An
Anthropological study of the supernatural ~2nd ed.! ~pp. 6–15!. Mountain View, CA: May-
field Publishing Company.
Gilkes, C. ~1997!. The role of church and community mothers: Ambivalent American sexism or
fragmented African familyhood? In T. Fulop & A. Raboteau ~Eds.!, African American reli-
gion: Interpretive essays in history and culture ~pp. 365–388!. New York: Routledge.
Grant, J. ~1989!. White women’s Christ and Black women’s Jesus: Feminist Christology and
womanist response. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Handal, P., Black-Lopez, W., & Moergen, S. ~1989!. Preliminary investigation of the relationship
between religion and psychological distress in Black women. Psychological Reports, 65,
971–975.
Harding, V. ~1997!. Religion and resistance among antebellum slaves: 1800–1860. In T. Fulop &
A. Raboteau ~Eds.!, African American religion: Interpretive essays in history and culture
~pp. 107–130!. New York: Routledge.
Harris, F. ~1994!. Something within: Religion as a mobilizer of African American political
activism. The Journal of Politics, 56, 42–68.
Higginbotham, E. ~1993!. Righteous discontent: The women’s movement in the Black Baptist
church, 1880–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Houf, H. ~1945!. What religion is and does: An introduction to the study of its problems and
values. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Jagers. R. ~1997!. Afrocultural integrity and the social development of African American chil-
dren: Some conceptual, empirical and practical considerations. Journal of Prevention and
Intervention in the Community, 16, 7–31.

Jagers, R., & Mock, L. ~1993!. Culture and social outcomes among inner-city African American
children: An Afrographic exploration. Journal of Black Psychology, 19, 391–405.
Jagers, R., & Smith, P. ~1996!. Further examination of the Spirituality Scale. Journal of Black
Psychology, 22, 429–442.
Jules-Rosette, B. ~1980!. Creative spirituality from Africa to America: Cross cultural influences in
contemporary religious forms. Western Journal of Black Studies, 4, 273–285.
Knox, D. ~1985!. Spirituality: A tool in the treatment and assessment of Black alcoholics and
their families. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 2, 33–44.
Kochanska, G. ~1991!. Socialization and temperament on the development of guilt and con-
science. Child Development, 62, 1379–1392.
Levin, J., Taylor, R., & Chatters, L. ~1995!. A multidimensional measure of religious involvement
for African Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 157–173.
Lincoln, C. ~1997!. The Muslim mission in the context of American social history. In T. Fulop
& A. Raboteau ~Eds.!, African American religion: Interpretive essays in history and culture
~pp. 277–294!. New York: Routledge.
Long, C. ~1997!. Perspectives for a study of African American religion in the United States. In
T. Fulop & A. Raboteau ~Eds.!, African American religion: Interpretive essays in history and
culture ~pp. 23–35!. New York: Routledge.
Lupfer, M., Tolliver, D., & Jackson, M. ~1996!. Explaining life altering occurrences: A test of the
“God of the gaps” hypothesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 379–391.
Marx, G. ~1967!. Protest and prejudice. New York: Harper & Row.
Maton, K. ~1989!. Community settings as buffers of life stress? Highly supportive churches,
mutual help groups, and senior centers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17,
203–232.
Maton, K., & Pargament, K. ~1987!. The roles of religion in prevention and promotion. Pre-
vention in Human Services, 5, 161–205.
Maton, K., & Wells, E. ~1995!. Religion as a community resource for well-being: Prevention,
healing, and empowerment pathways. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 177–193.
Mattis, J. ~1997!. The spiritual well-being of African Americans: A preliminary analysis. Journal
of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 16~1–2!, 103–120.
Mattis, J. ~2000!. African American women’s definitions of spirituality and religiosity. Journal of
Black Psychology, 26~1!, 101–122.
Mattis, J. ~2001a!. Religion and African American political life @Special Issue: Psychology as
Politics#. Political Psychology, 22~2!, 263–278.
Mattis, J. ~2001b!. Religion and spirituality in the everyday lives of African American women:
An exploration of the search for significance hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
McAdoo, H. ~1995!. Stress levels, family help patterns, and religiosity in middle- and working
class African American single mothers. Journal of Black Psychology 21, 424–449.
McCullough, M. ~1995!. Prayer and health: Conceptual issues, research review, and research
agenda. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23~1!, 15–29.
McKay, N. ~1989!. Nineteenth-century Black women’s spiritual autobiographies: Religious faith
and self-empowerment. In Personal Narratives Group ~Eds.!, Interpreting women’s lives:
Feminist theory and personal narrative ~pp. 139–154!. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
Moore, T. ~1991!. The African American church: A source of empowerment, mutual help, and
social change. Prevention in Human Services, 10, 147–167.

Myrdal, G. ~1944!. An American dilemma: The Negro problem and modern democracy. New
York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
Neighbors, H., Jackson, J., Bowman, P., & Gurin, G. ~1983!. Stress, coping, and Black mental
health: Preliminary findings from a national study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nelson, T. ~1997!. He made a way out of no way: Religious experience In an African American
congregation. Review of Religious Research, 39, 5–26.
Ozorak, E. ~1996!. The power, but not the glory: How women empower themselves through
religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35~1!, 17–29.
Pargament, K. ~1997!. The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New
York: The Guilford Press.
Pargament, K., & Park, C. ~1995!. Merely a defense? The variety of religious means and ends.
The Journal of Social Issues, 51, 13–32.
Reese, L., & Brown, R. ~1995!. The effects of religious messages on racial identity and system
blame among African Americans. The Journal of Politics, 57, 24–43.
Sarason, S. ~1974!. The psychological sense of community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Scanzoni, J. ~1971!. The Black family in modern society. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Shweder, R., Much, N., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. ~1997!. The “Big Three” of morality, auton-
omy, community and divinity, and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt
& P. Rosin ~Eds.!, Morality and health ~pp. 119–169!. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Stevenson, H. ~1997!. Managing anger: Protective, proactive, or adaptive racial socialization
identity profiles and African American manhood development. Journal of Prevention and
Intervention in the Community, 16, 35–61.
Stevenson, H., Herrero-Taylor, T., & Cameron, R. ~in press!. Buffer zone: Impact of racial
socialization experiences on anger expression in African American adolescents. In D. John-
son ~Ed.!, Racial socialization research, Series in advances in African American psychology.
Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry.
Tangney, J., Wagner, P., Hill-Barlow, D., Marscall, D., & Gramzow, R. ~1996!. Relation of shame
and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the life-span. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 797–809.
Taylor, R., & Chatters, L. ~1991!. Religious life. In J.S. Jackson ~Ed.!, Life in Black America
~pp. 105–123!. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ventis, W. ~1995!. The relationships between religion and mental health. Journal of Social
Issues, 51~2!, 33–48.
Wallace, J., & Williams, D. ~1997!. Religion and adolescent health-compromising behavior. In
J. Shulenberg, J.L. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann ~Eds.!, Health risks and developmental tran-
sitions during adolescence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, J. ~1995!. Cultivating a morality of care in African American adolescents: A culture based
model of violence prevention. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 175–188.
West, C. ~1993!. Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge Press.
Wilcox, C., & Gomez, L. ~1990!. Religion, group identification, and politics among American
Blacks. Sociological Analysis, 51, 271–285.
Williams, D., Larson, D., Buckler, R., Heckmann, R., & Pyle, C. ~1991!. Religion and psycho-
logical distress in a community sample. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 1257–
1262.
Wilmore, G. ~1986!. Black religion and Black radicalism: An interpretation of the religious
history of Afro-American people. New York: Orbis Books.
Wulff, D. ~1991!. The psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.

Youniss, J. ~1992!. Integrating culture and religion into developmental psychology. Family Per-
spective, 26, 423–440.
Zimmerman, M. ~1995!. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. American Journal
of Community Psychology, 23, 581–599.
Zinnbauer, B., Pargament, K., Cole, B., Rye, M., Butter, E., Belavich, T., Hipp, K., Scott, A., &
Kadar, J. ~1997!. Religiousness and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scien-
tific Study of Religion, 36, 549–564.

Spirituality in the lives of African Americans

Spirituality in the lives of African Americans

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Spirituality in the lives of African Americans (20)

More from Jonathan Dunnemann (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Spirituality in the lives of African Americans