Spring Performance Gains

© Copyright 2019 Pivotal Software, Inc. All rights Reserved.
Dave Syer
@david_syer
September 2019
Spring Boot 2.2
Performance
Improvements

Useful Benchmarks are the ones you run
Why running super-artificial benchmarks?
● Testing different parts of the web stack
● Comparing two versions (e.g., a specific patch)
● Measuring Framework overhead
● Optimizing for good latency, stable/predictable behavior,
THEN throughput
● Learning!
Is this a realistic use case?
What are we comparing here?
Show me latencies, percentiles,
error rates!
Is this really your app’s
bottleneck?
Rank your favorite features
(developer productivity, latency,
throughput, predictability…)
Run your own

Full Stack Benchmarks and Load Testers
Non-exhaustive selection...
● Gatling: https://gatling.io
○ Scala DSL, good features for “realistic” test scenarios
○ Nice colourful visualizations
● Wrk2: https://github.com/giltene/wrk2
○ CLI. Nice histogram outputs in plain text.
○ Constant throughput HTTP load
● JMeter: https://jmeter.apache.org/
○ Very common in the wild
○ Many features, including non-web apps
● Apache Bench: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/ab.html
○ CLI. Part of Apache HTTP. Installed from OS package manager.
○ Quick and dirty

Wrk2
$ wrk -t2 -c100 -d30s -R2000 --latency http://gcp:8080
Running 30s test @ http://gcp:8080
Thread calibration: mean lat.: 45.526ms, rate sampling interval: 174ms
...
Latency Distribution (HdrHistogram - Recorded Latency)
50.000% 29.44ms
75.000% 33.92ms
90.000% 43.42ms
...
99.999% 654.34ms
100.000% 654.34ms
Detailed Percentile spectrum:
...

Latency Distribution
Workload: Webflux JSON GET
Latency (ms)

Latency Ratios

Microbenchmarks
● JMH: https://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/
○ Part of OpenJDK
○ Forking and threading
● MicrobenchmarkRunner:
https://github.com/mp911de/microbenchmark-runner
○ JUnit integration with JMH
○ Run “test” in IDE and generate benchmark data

MicrobenchmarkRunner
@Warmup(iterations = 1, time = 1)
@Fork(value = 1, warmups = 0)
@Microbenchmark
public class DispatcherBenchmark {
@Benchmark
public void test(MainState state) throws Exception {
state.run("/foo");
}
@State(Scope.Thread)
@AuxCounters(Type.EVENTS)
public static class MainState {
…
}

DispatcherHandler Benchmarks
DispatcherHandler is 30% faster in Spring Boot 2.2
boot class method count errors median mean range
2.0 WebFluxBenchmark main 111557.000 ≈ 0 9702.130 10366.967 561.554
2.2 WebFluxBenchmark main 140320.000 ≈ 0 12871.144 13654.106 646.697

Spring Framework Changes
WebFlux and MVC:
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/22644

Gatling
class JsonGet extends Simulation {
val httpProtocol = http
.baseUrl(baseUrl)
val scn = scenario("Get JSON payload")
.forever {
exec(http("jsonGet").get("/user/bchmark"))
}
setUp(
scn.inject(
incrementConcurrentUsers(increment)
.times(steps)
.eachLevelLasting(20 seconds)
.separatedByRampsLasting(10 seconds)
.startingFrom(0)
)
).maxDuration(20 minutes).protocols(httpProtocol)
}

Spring Web Performance Benchmark
Workload: MVC plain text echo

Spring Web Performance Benchmark
Workload: reactor-netty plain text GET

Spring Boot 2.1.0 vs. 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Spring MVC:
● +20-30% req/sec depending on the use case
● Improved latency (75th percentile is now 95th percentile!)
Spring WebFlux:
● +20-40% req/sec, more stable with concurrency
● Annotation model is now on par with Functional one
● Latency -10% overall, higher percentiles are much better
● A lot of it is building up on Reactor Netty’s improvements
This is a very subjective benchmark, you won’t get the same results in your apps!

How Fast is Spring?
TL;DR How can I make my app go faster?
● Exclude stuff from the classpath that you know you don’t need
● Use @Configuration(proxyBeanMethods=false)
● Use the spring-context-indexer
● Use Spring 2.2 and Spring 5.2
● Use explicit spring.config.location
● Make bean definitions lazy by default
(spring.main.lazy-initialization=true ,
spring.data.jpa.repositories.bootstrap-mode=lazy )
● Unpack the fat jar and run with an explicit classpath, use application main class
● Run the JVM with -noverify. Also consider -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 . Java 11
or J9 use AppCDS.
● Import autoconfigurations individually
● Use functional bean definitions
● (Build a native image)

More Classes Loaded -> More Time to Start

Riﬀ FunctionInvoker and Spring Cloud Function
@SpringBootApplication
@EnableFunctionDeployer
public class JavaFunctionInvokerApplication
implements ApplicationContextInitializer<GenericApplicationContext> {
@Override
public void initialize(GenericApplicationContext context) {
context.registerBean(FunctionDeployerConfiguration.class,
() -> new FunctionDeployerConfiguration());
context.registerBean(
"org.springframework.cloud.function.deployer.FunctionCreatorConfiguration",
ClassUtils.resolveClassName(
"org.springframework.cloud.function.deployer.FunctionCreatorConfiguration",
context.getClassLoader()));
…
}
Functional re-write https://github.com/projectriﬀ/java-function-invoker

Riﬀ FunctionInvoker and Spring Cloud Function
15x faster with Spring Boot 2.2, Webﬂux, 1 cpu
container cpus startup(ms)
===========================
riff 4 2817
scf 4 664
riff 2 4614
scf 2 653
riff 1 16782
scf 1 2121
scf:n 1 1091

WebFlux and Micro Apps
Flux benchmarks from https://github.com/dsyer/spring-boot-startup-bench (startup time
seconds)
class method sample beans classes heap memory median mean range
Netty Boot 2.2
MainBenchmark main demo 91.000 4392.000 8.121 49.800 0.760 0.770 0.009
Netty Boot 2.1
Netty Boot 2.0

MVC and Micro Apps
MVC benchmarks from https://github.com/dsyer/spring-boot-startup-bench (startup time
seconds)
MVC Boot 2.2
MainBenchmark main actr 208.000 5268.000 10.161 69.840 1.033 1.060 0.048
MVC Boot 2.1
MVC Boot 2.0

WebFlux and Micro Apps
Flux benchmarks from https://github.com/dsyer/spring-boot-startup-bench
TODO: add some numbers from Spring Boot 2.0, and for MVC
MainBenchmark main jlog 80.000 3598.000 6.141 43.006 0.667 0.679 0.019
MiniBenchmark boot jlog 28.000 3336.000 7.082 41.949 0.588 0.597 0.014
MiniBenchmark mini jlog 27.000 3059.000 5.487 38.953 0.534 0.545 0.018
MiniBenchmark micro jlog 2.000 2176.000 4.608 32.886 0.336 0.345 0.013

Manual Autoconﬁguration
Blog: https://spring.io/blog/2019/01/21/manual-bean-deﬁnitions-in-spring-boot
@SpringBootConfiguration
@ImportAutoConfiguration({
WebFluxAutoConfiguration.class, ReactiveWebServerFactoryAutoConfiguration.class,
ErrorWebFluxAutoConfiguration.class, HttpHandlerAutoConfiguration.class,
ConfigurationPropertiesAutoConfiguration.class, PropertyPlaceholderAutoConfiguration.class})
@RestController
public class DemoApplication {
@GetMapping("/")
public Mono<String> home() {
return Mono.just("Hello World");
}
}

Spring Boot Features
Repo: https://github.com/dsyer/spring-boot-features
@SpringBootFeaturesApplication(WebFluxConfigurations.class)
@RestController
public class DemoApplication {
@GetMapping("/")
public Mono<String> home() {
return Mono.just("Hello World");
}
}

Spring Fu
Repo: https://github.com/spring-projects-experimental/spring-fu
val app = application(WebApplicationType.REACTIVE) {
beans {
bean<SampleHandler>()
}
webFlux {
port = if (profiles.contains("test")) 8181 else 8080
router {
val handler = ref<SampleHandler>()
GET("/", handler::hello)
GET("/api", handler::json)
}
codecs {
string()
jackson()
}
}
}

PetClinic Benchmarks
● Blue: out of the box Spring Boot.
● Yellow: manual autoconfiguration.
● Red: fully functional via Spring Init

Spring Framework Changes
Bean Factory:

start.spring.io startup
Benchmarks using https://github.com/dsyer/spring-boot-startup-bench launcher
$ java -jar benchmarks.jar site.jar
2.1
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MainBenchmark.jar avgt 10 4.280 ± 0.061 s/op
MainBenchmark.launcher avgt 10 4.420 ± 0.036 s/op
MainBenchmark.main avgt 10 3.622 ± 0.035 s/op
2.2 with -Dspring.main.lazy-initialization=true -Dspring.cache.type=none
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MainBenchmark.jar avgt 10 2.251 ± 0.022 s/op
MainBenchmark.launcher avgt 10 1.962 ± 0.048 s/op
MainBenchmark.main avgt 10 1.767 ± 0.023 s/op

Spring Data Repositories
● Bootstrap mode can be useful at dev time
(spring.data.jpa.repositories.bootstrap-mode=lazy )
● Signiﬁcant runtime performance improvements just before Spring Boot 2.2.0.M5
● Benchmarks at: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-dev-tools/

Spring Data JPA Benchmarks
Throughput Ratio After / Before Optimization

Test Containers
Spring Boot 2.2

Test Containers
● https://www.testcontainers.org
● Re-usable containers for development environment
@SpringBootTest({
"spring.datasource.url=jdbc:tc:mysql:5.7.22:///petclinic",
"spring.datasource.driver-class-name=org.testcontainers.jdbc.ContainerDatabaseDriver"
})
public abstract class MysqlIntegrationTest {
…
}

Test Containers: Static Initializer
public static class Initializer
implements ApplicationContextInitializer<ConfigurableApplicationContext> {
private static MySQLContainer<?> mysql;
static {
mysql = new MySQLContainer<>().withUsername("petclinic").withPassword("petclinic")
.withDatabaseName("petclinic");
mysql.start();
}
@Override
public void initialize(ConfigurableApplicationContext context) {
TestPropertyValues.of("spring.datasource.url=" + mysql.getJdbcUrl()).applyTo(context);
}
}

Test Containers: Reusable Containers
Spring Boot Test Containers App start (s) JVM running (s)
2.1.6 1.12.1 5.881 21.658
2.2.0 reusable_containers 2.055 4.812
Workload: PetClinic MySQL
static {
mysql = new MySQLContainer<>().withUsername("petclinic").withPassword("petclinic")
.withDatabaseName("petclinic").withReuse(true);
mysql.start();
}

Graal VM
● Oracle research project https://github.com/oracle/graal/
● OpenJDK + GC Engine, alternative to C1
● Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE)
● Polyglot programming model (Javascript, Ruby, R, Python, …)
● Native images

GraalVM GC: start.spring.io Project Generation
Benchmarks using JMH Microbenchmark Runner (projects per second)
JVM class method median mean range
Hotspot ProjectGenerationIntegrationTests projectBuilds 57.674 65.802 5.223
GraalCE ProjectGenerationIntegrationTests projectBuilds 67.270 89.004 14.268
GraalEE ProjectGenerationIntegrationTests projectBuilds 74.396 92.541 13.535
Graal CE is faster but EE has an edge. The Graal measurements are more noisy.

Native Images
● Spring 5.2 and Spring Boot 2.2 already have some features
● PetClinic:
○ Compile time: 10minutes(!)
○ Image size: 60MB
○ Startup time: 200ms
● More coming in 5.3/2.3. See presentation by Andy Clement and Sebastien Deleuze.

All that Glitters
(Admittedly stupid) benchmark with wrk, hammering HTTP GET on localhost
$ wrk -t4 -c100 -d30 --latency http://localhost:8080
Latency
JVM throughput(req/sec) 50%(ms) 99%(ms)
Hotspot 116,000 0.661 16
GraalCE 63,927 1.140 24.43
GraalEE 119,116 0.520 24.71
GraalCE (native) 19,320 5.650 32.18
GraalEE (native) 22,139 4.060 22.68

Spring Performance Gains

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Spring Performance Gains (20)

More from VMware Tanzu (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Spring Performance Gains