Strategic management

Strategic management
Introduction

Definition
• Strategic management can be defined as the art and science of formulating,
implementing, and evaluating cross-functional decisions that enable an
organization to achieve its objectives.
• As this definition implies, strategic management focuses on integrating
management, marketing, finance/accounting, production/operations, research
and development, and information systems to achieve organizational success.
The term strategic management in
• Sometimes the term strategic management is used to refer to strategy
formulation, implementation, and evaluation, with strategic planning referring
only to strategy formulation. The purpose of strategic management is to exploit
and create new and different opportunities for tomorrow;
• long-range planning, in contrast, tries to optimize for tomorrow the trends of
today.

Strategic plan
• A strategic plan is, in essence, a company’s game plan. Just as a
football team needs a good game plan to have a chance for success, a
company must have a good strategic plan to compete successfully.
Profit margins among firms in most industries have been so reduced
by the global economic recession that there is little room for error in
the overall strategic plan.
• A strategic plan results from tough managerial choices among
numerous good alternatives, and it signals commitment to specific
markets, policies, procedures, and operations in lieu of other, “less
desirable” courses of action.

Stages of Strategic Management
• strategy formulation, Strategy implementation, and strategy evaluation.
• Strategy formulation includes developing a vision and mission, identifying an
organization’s external opportunities and threats, determining internal strengths
and weaknesses, establishing long-term objectives, generating alternative
strategies, and choosing particular strategies to pursue.
• Strategy-formulation issues include deciding what new businesses to enter, what
businesses to abandon, how to allocate resources, whether to expand operations
or diversify, whether to enter international markets, whether to merge or form a
joint venture, and how to avoid a hostile takeover.
• Because no organization has unlimited resources, strategists must decide which
alternative strategies will benefit the firm most. Strategy-formulation decisions
commit an organization to specific products, markets, resources, and
technologies over an extended period of time.
• Strategies determine long-term competitive advantages.

Strategy implementation
• Strategy implementation often is called the “action stage” of
strategic management.
• Implementing strategy means mobilizing employees and managers to
put formulated strategies into action. Often considered to be the
most difficult stage in strategic management, strategy
implementation requires personal discipline, commitment, and
sacrifice.
• Successful strategy implementation hinges upon managers’ ability to
motivate employees, which is more an art than a science. Strategies
formulated but not implemented serve no useful purpose.

Strategy implementation
• Strategy implementation requires a firm to establish annual
objectives, devise policies, motivate employees, and allocate
resources so that formulated strategies can be executed.
• Strategy implementation includes developing a strategy-supportive
culture, creating an effective organizational structure, redirecting
marketing efforts, preparing budgets, developing and utilizing
information systems, and linking employee compensation to
organizational performance.

strategy evaluation
• Strategy evaluation is the final stage in strategic management. Managers
desperately need to know when particular strategies are not working well;
strategy evaluation is the primary means for obtaining this information.
• All strategies are subject to future modification because external and internal
factors are constantly changing.
• Three fundamental strategy-evaluation activities are: -
(1) reviewing external and internal factors that are the bases for current strategies,
(2) measuring performance, and
(3) taking corrective actions.
• Strategy formulation, implementation, and evaluation activities occur at three
hierarchical levels and by fostering communication and interaction among
managers and employees across hierarchical levels, strategic management helps
a firm function as a competitive team.

Integrating Intuition and Analysis
• The strategic management process can be described as an objective,
logical, systematic approach for making major decisions in an organization.
• It attempts to organize qualitative and quantitative information in a way
that allows effective decisions to be made under conditions of uncertainty.
• Most organizations can benefit from strategic management, which is based
upon integrating intuition and analysis in decision making.
• Choosing an intuitive or analytic approach to decision making is not an
either–or proposition. Managers at all levels in an organization inject their
intuition and judgment into strategic-management analyses.
• Analytical thinking and intuitive thinking complement each other. In a
sense, the strategic-management process is an attempt both to duplicate
what goes
• on in the mind of a brilliant, intuitive person who knows the business and
to couple it with analysis.

Adapting to Change
• The strategic-management process is based on the belief that
organizations should continually monitor internal and external events
and trends so that timely changes can be made as needed.
• The rate and magnitude of changes that affect organizations are
increasing dramatically as evidenced how the global economic
recession has caught so many firms by surprise. Firms, like organisms,
must be “
• To survive, all organizations must astutely identify and adapt to
change. The strategic management process is aimed at allowing
organizations to adapt effectively to change over the long run. adept
at adapting” or they will not survive.

Adapting to Change
• As Waterman has noted:
• In today’s business environment, more than in any preceding area,
the only constant is change. Successful organizations effectively
manage change, continuously adapting their bureaucracies,
strategies, systems, products, and cultures to survive the shocks and
prosper from the forces that decimate the competition.
• The need to adapt to change leads organizations to key strategic-
management questions, such as “What kind of business should we
become?” “Are we in the right field(s)?” “Should we reshape our
business?” “What new competitors are entering our industry?”
“What strategies should we pursue?” “How are our customers
changing?” “Are new technologies being developed that could put us
out of business?”

Key Terms in Strategic Management
• Competitive Advantage
• Strategic management is all about gaining and maintaining competitive
advantage. This term can be defined as “anything that a firm does especially well
compared to rival firms” When a firm can do something that rival firms cannot
do, or owns something that rival firms desire, that can represent a competitive
advantage.
• Having less fixed assets than rival firms also can provide major competitive
advantages in a global recession.
• Normally, a firm can sustain a competitive advantage for only a certain period due
to rival firms imitating and undermining that advantage. A firm must strive to
achieve sustained competitive advantage by
(1) continually adapting to changes in external trends and events and internal
capabilities, competencies, and resources; and by
(2) effectively formulating, implementing, and evaluating strategies that capitalize
upon those factors.

• Strategists/chief strategy officer (CSO)
• Strategists are the individuals who are most responsible for the success or
failure of an organization such as chief executive officer, president, owner,
chair of the board, executive director, chancellor, dean, or entrepreneur.
• Strategists help an organization gather, analyze, and organize information.
They track industry and competitive trends, develop forecasting models
and scenario analyses, evaluate corporate and divisional performance, spot
emerging market opportunities, identify business threats, and develop
creative action plans. Strategic planners usually serve in a support or staff
role.
Any manager who has responsibility for a unit or division, responsibility for
profit and loss outcomes, or direct authority over a major piece of the
business is a strategic manager (strategist).

• Vision and Mission Statements
• Many organizations today develop a vision statement that answers the question “What
do we want to become?” Developing a vision statement is often considered the first step
in strategic planning, preceding even development of a mission statement.
• A mission statement identifies the scope of a firm’s operations in product and market
terms.” It addresses the basic question that faces all strategists:
• “What is our business?” A clear mission statement describes the values and priorities of
an organization. Developing a mission statement compels strategists to think about the
nature and scope of present operations and to assess the potential attractiveness of
future markets and activities.
• A mission statement broadly charts the future direction of an organization.
• A mission statement is a constant reminder to its employees of why the organization
exists and what the founders envisioned when they put their fame and fortune at risk to
breathe life into their dreams.

External Opportunities and Threats
• External opportunities and external threats refer to economic, social, cultural,
demographic, environmental, political, legal, governmental, technological, and
competitive trends and events that could significantly benefit or harm an
organization in the future.
• Opportunities and threats are largely beyond the control of a single
organization—thus the word external.
• A basic tenet of strategic management is that firms need to formulate strategies
to take advantage of external opportunities and to avoid or reduce the impact of
external threats.
• For this reason, identifying, monitoring, and evaluating external opportunities
and threats are essential for success. This process of conducting research and
gathering and assimilating external information is sometimes called
environmental scanning or industry analysis. Lobbying is one activity that some
organizations utilize to influence external opportunities and threats.

Internal Strengths and Weaknesses
• Internal strengths and internal weaknesses are an organization’s controllable
activities that are performed especially well or poorly. They arise in the
management, marketing, finance/ accounting, production/operations, research
and development, and management information systems activities of a business.
Identifying and evaluating organizational strengths and weaknesses in the
functional areas of a business is an essential strategic management activity.
• Organizations strive to pursue strategies that capitalize on internal strengths and
eliminate internal weaknesses.
• Strengths and weaknesses are determined relative to competitors. Relative
deficiency or superiority is important information. Also, strengths and
weaknesses can be determined by elements of being rather than performance.
For example, a strength may involve ownership of natural resources or a historic
reputation for quality. Strengths and weaknesses may be determined relative to a
firm’s own objectives. For example, high levels of inventory turnover may not be
a strength to a firm that seeks never to stock-out.

Long-Term Objectives
• Objectives can be defined as specific results that an organization seeks to achieve
in pursuing its basic mission. Long-term means more than one year. Objectives
are essential for organizational success because they state direction; aid in
evaluation; create synergy; reveal priorities; focus coordination; and provide a
basis for effective planning, organizing, motivating, and controlling activities.
• In a multidimensional firm, objectives should be established for the overall
company and for each division.
Strategies
• Strategies are the means by which long-term objectives will be achieved.
Business strategies may include geographic expansion, diversification, acquisition,
product development, market penetration, retrenchment, divestiture,
liquidation, and joint ventures.
• Strategies are potential actions that require top management decisions and large
amounts of the firm’s resources. In addition, strategies affect an organization’s
long-term prosperity, typically for at least five years, and thus are future-oriented.
Strategies have multifunctional or multidivisional consequences and require
consideration of both the external and internal factors facing the firm.

• Annual Objectives
• Annual objectives are short-term milestones that organizations must
achieve to reach long term objectives. Like long-term objectives, annual
objectives should be measurable, quantitative, challenging, realistic,
consistent, and prioritized.
• They should be established at the corporate, divisional, and functional
levels in a large organization.
• Annual objectives should be stated in terms of management, marketing,
finance/accounting, production/operations, research and development,
and management information systems (MIS) accomplishments.
• A set of annual objectives is needed for each long-term objective. Annual
objectives are especially important in strategy implementation, whereas
long-term objectives are particularly important in strategy formulation.
• Annual objectives represent the basis for allocating resources.

Policies
• Policies are the means by which annual objectives will be achieved. Policies
include guidelines, rules, and procedures established to support efforts to
achieve stated objectives.
• Policies are guides to decision making and address repetitive or recurring
situations. Policies are most often stated in terms of management,
marketing, finance/accounting, production/operations, research and
development, and computer information systems activities.
• Policies can be established at the corporate level and apply to an entire
organization at the divisional level and apply to a single division, or at the
functional level and apply to particular operational activities or
departments Policies, like annual objectives, are especially important in
strategy implementation because they outline an organization’s
expectations of its employees and managers. Policies allow consistency an
coordination within and between organizational departments.

Strategy Tactics
Purpose
To identify clear broader goals that advance the
overall organization and organize resources.
To utilize specific resources to achieve sub-goals that
support the defined mission.
Roles
Individuals who influence resources in the
organization. They understand how a set of tactics
work together to achieve goals.
Specific domain experts that maneuver limited
resources into actions to achieve a set of goals.
Accountability Held accountable to overall health of organization. Held accountable to specific resources assigned.
Scope
All the resources within the organizations, as well as
broader market conditions including competitors,
customers, and economy. Yet don’t over think it, to
paraphrase my business partner Charlene Li,
“Strategy is often what you don’t do”.
A subset of resources used in a plan or process. Tactics
are often specific tactics with limited resources to
achieve broader goals.
Duration Long Term, changes infrequently. Shorter Term, flexible to specific market conditions.
Methods
Uses experience, research, analysis, thinking, then
communication.
Uses experiences, best practices, plans, processes, and
teams.
Outputs
Produces clear organizational goals, plans, maps,
guideposts, and key performance measurements.
Produces clear deliverables and outputs using people,
tools, time.
The Difference between Strategy and Tactics

The Strategic-Management Model
• The strategic-management process can best be studied and applied using a
model.
• Every model represents some kind of process. The framework illustrated in Figure
1-1 is a widely accepted, comprehensive model of the strategic-management
process. This model does not guarantee success, but it does represent a clear and
practical approach for formulating, implementing, and evaluating strategies.
• Relationships among major components of the strategic-management process
are shown in the model, which appears in all subsequent chapters with
appropriate areas shaped to show the particular focus of each chapter.
• These are three important questions to answer in developing a strategic plan:
• Where are we now?
• Where do we want to go?
• How are we going to get there?

The Strategic-Management Model
• Every organization has a vision, mission, objectives, and strategy, even if
these elements are not consciously designed, written, or communicated.
The answer to where an organization is going can be determined largely by
where the organization has been!
• The strategic-management process is dynamic and continuous. A change in
any one of the major components in the model can necessitate a change in
any or all of the other components.
• For instance, a shift in the economy could represent a major opportunity
and require a change in long-term objectives and strategies; a failure to
accomplish annual objectives could require a change in policy; or a major
competitor’s change in strategy could require a change in the firm’s
mission.
• Therefore, strategy formulation, implementation, and evaluation activities
should be performed on a continual basis, not just at the end of the year or
semiannually. The strategic-management process never really ends.

Benefits of Strategic Management
• Strategic management allows an organization to be more proactive than reactive
in shaping its own future; it allows an organization to initiate and influence
(rather than just respond to) activities—and thus to exert control over its own
destiny.
• Small business owners, chief executive officers, presidents, and managers of
many for-profit and nonprofit organizations have recognized and realized the
benefits of strategic management.
• Historically, the principal benefit of strategic management has been to help
organizations formulate better strategies through the use of a more systematic,
logical, and rational approach to strategic choice. This certainly continues to be a
major benefit of strategic management, but research studies now indicate that
the process, rather than the decision or document, is the more important
contribution of strategic management.
• Communication is a key to successful strategic management. Through
involvement in the process, in other words, through dialogue and participation,
managers and employees become committed to supporting the organization.

Note that all firms need all employees on a mission to help the firm succeed.
The manner in which strategic management is carried out is thus
exceptionally important. A major aim of the process is to achieve the
understanding of and commitment from all managers and employees.
Understanding may be the most important benefit of strategic management,
followed by commitment.

• A great benefit of strategic management, then, is the opportunity that the
process provides to empower individuals.
• Empowerment is the act of strengthening employees’ sense of effectiveness by
encouraging them to participate in decision making and to exercise initiative and
imagination, and rewarding them for doing so.
• More and more organizations are decentralizing the strategic-management
process, recognizing that planning must involve lower-level managers and
employees. The notion of centralized staff planning is being replaced in
organizations by decentralized line-manager planning.
• The worst thing strategists can do is develop strategic plans themselves and then
present them to operating managers to execute.
• Through involvement in the process, line managers become “owners” of the
strategy. Ownership of strategies by the people who have to execute them is a
key to success!
• Both managers and employees must also be involved in strategy formulation,
implementation, and evaluation activities. Participation is a key to gaining
commitment for needed changes.

Financial Benefits
• Businesses using strategic-management concepts show significant improvement
in sales, profitability, and productivity compared to firms without systematic
planning activities. High-performing firms tend to do systematic planning to
prepare for future fluctuations in their external and internal environments.
• Firms with planning systems more closely resembling strategic-management
theory generally exhibit superior long-term financial performance relative to their
industry. High-performing firms seem to make more informed decisions with
good anticipation of both short- and long-term consequences.
• In contrast, firms that perform poorly often engage in activities that are
shortsighted and do not reflect good forecasting of future conditions. Strategists
of low-performing organizations are often preoccupied with solving internal
problems and meeting paperwork deadlines. They typically underestimate their
competitors’ strengths and overestimate their own firm’s strengths. They often
attribute weak performance to uncontrollable factors such as a poor economy,
technological change, or foreign competition.

Nonfinancial Benefits
• strategic management offers an enhanced awareness of external threats, an
improved understanding of competitors’ strategies, increased employee
productivity, reduced resistance to change, and a clearer understanding of
performance–reward relationships. Strategic management enhances the
problem-prevention capabilities of organizations because it promote interaction
among managers at all divisional and functional levels.
• The strategic-management process provides a basis for identifying and
rationalizing the need or change to all managers and employees of a firm; it helps
them view change as an opportunity rather than as a threat.
Greenley stated that strategic management offers the following benefits:
1. It allows for identification, prioritization, and exploitation of opportunities.
2. It provides an objective view of management problems.
3. It represents a framework for improved coordination and control of activities
4. It minimizes the effects of adverse conditions and changes

5. It allows major decisions to better support established objectives.
6. It allows more effective allocation of time and resources to identified
opportunities.
7. It allows fewer resources and less time to be devoted to correcting erroneous or
ad hoc decisions.
8. It creates a framework for internal communication among personnel.
9. It helps integrate the behavior of individuals into a total effort.
10. It provides a basis for clarifying individual responsibilities.
11. It encourages forward thinking.
12. It provides a cooperative, integrated, and enthusiastic approach to tackling
problems and opportunities.
13. It encourages a favorable attitude toward change.
14. It gives a degree of discipline and formality to the management of a business.

Why Some Firms Do No Strategic Planning
Some firms do not engage in strategic planning, and some firms do strategic planning but receive no
support from managers and employees. Some reasons
• Lack of knowledge or experience in strategic planning—No training in strategic planning.
• Poor reward structures—When an organization assumes success, it often fails to reward success.
When failure occurs, then the firm may punish.
• Firefighting—An organization can be so deeply embroiled in resolving crises and firefighting that it
reserves no time for planning.
• Waste of time—Some firms see planning as a waste of time because no marketable product is
produced. Time spent on planning is an investment.
• Too expensive—Some organizations see planning as too expensive in time and money.
• Laziness—People may not want to put forth the effort needed to formulate a plan.
• Content with success—Particularly if a firm is successful, individuals may feel there is no need to
plan because things are fine as they stand. But success today does not guarantee success tomorrow.

Why Some Firms Do No Strategic Planning
• Fear of failure—By not taking action, there is little risk of failure unless a problem is urgent and
pressing. Whenever something worthwhile is attempted, there is some risk of failure.
• Overconfidence—As managers amass experience, they may rely less on formalized planning.
Being overconfident or overestimating experience can bring demise. Forethought is rarely wasted
and is often the mark of professionalism.
• Prior bad experience—People may have had a previous bad experience with planning, that is,
cases in which plans have been long, impractical, or inflexible.
• Self-interest—When someone has achieved status, privilege, or self-esteem through effectively
using an old system, he or she often sees a new plan as a threat.
• Fear of the unknown—People may be uncertain of their abilities to learn new skills, of their
aptitude with new systems, or of their ability to take on new roles.
• Honest difference of opinion—People may sincerely believe the plan is wrong. They may view the
situation from a different viewpoint, or they may have aspirations for themselves or the
organization that are different from the plan.
• Suspicion—Employees may not trust management.

Pitfalls in Strategic Planning
Strategic planning is an involved, intricate, and complex process. It does not provide a ready-to-use
prescription for success. Being aware of potential pitfalls and being prepared to address them is
essential to success. Some pitfalls to watch for and avoid in strategic planning are these:
• Using strategic planning to gain control over decisions and resources
• Doing strategic planning only to satisfy accreditation or regulatory requirements
• Too hastily moving from mission development to strategy formulation
• Failing to communicate the plan to employees, who continue working in the dark
• Top managers making many intuitive decisions that conflict with the formal plan or not actively
supporting the strategic-planning process
• Failing to use plans as a standard for measuring performance
• Delegating planning to a “planner” rather than involving all managers
• Failing to involve key employees in all phases of planning or to create a collaborative climate
supportive of change
• Viewing planning as unnecessary or unimportant
• Becoming so engrossed in current problems that insufficient or no planning is done
• Being so formal in planning that flexibility and creativity are stifled

Guidelines for Effective Strategic Management
• A technically imperfect plan that is implemented well will achieve more than the
perfect plan that never gets off the paper on which it is typed.
• Strategic management must not become a self-perpetuating bureaucratic
mechanism. Rather, it must be a self-reflective learning process that familiarizes
managers and employees in the organization with key strategic issues and
feasible alternatives for resolving those issues.
• Strategic management must not become ritualistic, stilted, orchestrated, or too
formal, predictable, and rigid. Words should represent the medium for explaining
strategic issues and organizational responses.
• A key role of strategists is to facilitate continuous organizational learning and
change.
• R. T. Lenz offered some important guidelines for effective strategic management:

1. Keep the strategic-management process as simple and nonroutine as possible.
Eliminate jargon and arcane planning language.
2. Remember, strategic management is a process for fostering learning and
action, not merely a formal system for control.
3. To avoid routinized behavior, vary assignments, team membership, meeting
formats, and the planning calendar.
4. The process should not be totally predictable, and settings must be changed to
stimulate creativity.
5. Emphasize word-oriented plans with numbers as back-up material.
6. If managers cannot express their strategy in a paragraph or so, they either do
not have one or do not understand it.
7. Stimulate thinking and action that challenge the assumptions underlying
current corporate strategy.

8. Welcome bad news. If strategy is not working, managers desperately need to
know it.
9. Further, no pertinent information should be classified as inadmissible merely
because it cannot be quantified.
10. Build a corporate culture in which the role of strategic management and its
essential purposes are understood.
11. Do not permit “technicians” to co-opt the process. It is ultimately a process for
learning and action. Speak of it in these terms.
12. Attend to psychological, social, and political dimensions, as well as the
information infrastructure and administrative procedures supporting it.
13. An important guideline for effective strategic management is open-
mindedness. A willingness and eagerness to consider new information, new
viewpoints, new ideas, and new possibilities is essential; all organizational
members must share a spirit of inquiry and learning.

14. Strategists such as chief executive officers, presidents, owners of small
businesses, and heads of government agencies must commit themselves to
listen to and understand managers’ positions well enough to be able to
restate those positions to the managers’ satisfaction.
15. In addition, managers and employees throughout the firm should be able
to describe the strategists’ positions to the satisfaction of the strategists. This
degree of discipline will promote understanding and learning.
16. Most organizations today recognize that strategic-management concepts
and techniques can enhance the effectiveness of decisions. Subjective
factors such as attitudes toward risk, concern for social responsibility, and
organizational culture will always affect strategy-formulation decisions, but
organizations need to be as objective as possible in considering qualitative
factors.

Comparing Business and Military Strategy
• A fundamental difference between military and business strategy is that
business strategy is formulated, implemented, and evaluated with an
assumption of competition,
• whereas military strategy is based on an assumption of conflict.
Nonetheless, military conflict and business competition are so similar that
many strategic-management techniques apply equally to both.
• Business strategists have access to valuable insights the military thinkers
have refined over time.
• Superior strategy formulation and implementation can overcome an
opponent’s superiority in numbers and resources.
• Both business and military organizations must adapt to change and
constantly improve to be successful.
• Too often, firms do not change their strategies when their environment
and competitive conditions dictate the need to change and so they lose.

Conclusion
• Organizations should take a proactive rather than a reactive approach in
their industry, and they should strive to influence, anticipate, and initiate
rather than just respond to events.
• The strategic-management process embodies this approach to decision
making. It represents a logical, systematic, and objective approach for
determining an enterprise’s future direction.
• Successful strategists take the time to think about their businesses, where
they are with their businesses, and what they want to be as
organizations—and then they implement programs and policies to get from
where they are to where they want to be in a reasonable period of time.
• It is a known and accepted fact that people and organizations that plan
ahead are much more likely to become what they want to become than
those that do not plan at all.

Strategic management

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Strategic management (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Strategic management