The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and Scientific Discoveries (www.kiu.ac.ug)

www.idosr.org Okwerede, 2024
11
International Digital Organization for Scientific Research IDOSRJAM 9.2.11150
IDOSR JOURNAL OF ARTS AND MANAGEMENT 9(2):11-15, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.59298/IDOSRJAM/2024/9.2.11150
The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and
Scientific Discoveries
Okwerede Emmanuel
College of Economics, Kampala International University, Uganda
ABSTRACT
Throughout history, artistic movements and scientific discoveries have often developed in tandem,
reflecting a rich interplay of ideas that transcend disciplinary boundaries. From the Renaissance's
integration of perspective and anatomy to the technological advancements driving digital media art, these
intersections highlight a mutual influence that fosters innovation and creativity. This study investigates
underexamined yet striking examples of this phenomenon, emphasizing how art and science have shaped
and inspired each other. By analyzing key moments where artistic methodologies anticipated scientific
breakthroughs—or vice versa—we uncover how optical, neurological, and technological developments
have catalyzed artistic expression, often blurring the lines between empirical observation and creative
intuition. This dialogue between art and science offers profound insights into their shared processes,
methodologies, and cultural impact, underlining their collective role in advancing human understanding
and imagination.
Keywords: Art and Science Interplay, Artistic Movements, Scientific Discoveries, Interdisciplinary
Innovation, Renaissance Perspective.
INTRODUCTION
Today, there are many examples throughout
history of scientific discoveries often coinciding
with the birth of an artistic movement. From
the most famous of these is the artistic response
to the Theory of Relativity, to those that surely
involve the scientific community but are less
known to the general public. We would like to
investigate in general how the artistic
movements of the past centuries can bear
witness to an interdisciplinary dialogue that has
taken place over the centuries between artists,
scientists, and technologists, rather than
considering only the most obvious and episodic
cases. The first idea that we propose is that art
and science, as well as technique and their
applications in technology, have long been
connected and feed off each other. The aim is to
propose this interconnection by identifying a
few particularly striking cases, which are not
studied very often, where a scientific discovery
is born together with a work of art, or vice
versa. It is interesting and paradigmatic that
there are numerous examples of artistic modus
operandi that anticipate individual physical and
biological discoveries. Both are inspired by
optics, psycho-physical, and physiological
theories, as well as by technology and
neurology. By revealing the impalpable art of
capturing light, X-rays, and electricity, the
discovery of subatomic inert matter and the
nervous impulses find unexpected simulations in
stagecraft, kinetic installations, the chirality of
optical illusions, and multimedia art. In
summary, we believe that these are examples in
which the presuppositions, the scientific
research in progress, increasingly overlap with
the practical application and fiction of art in
terms of technological development. If the
experience is always local, we hope that such
examples can be shared as a starting point for
an inspiring dialogue [1, 2].
Historical Intersections of Art and Science
The relationship between art and science is far
from seamless. Since the Upper Paleolithic,
there has been a deep-seated connection
between both disciplines. The golden ratio has
been traced in Greek temples, Mozart's sonatas,
and anatomical torsos. An abundance of
©IDOSR PUBLICATIONS ISSN: 2550-7974

12
mathematical equations and neuroscientific
research has validated what have been long-
standing speculations: that art exists in spaces
far beyond the grasp of our intuition. The
similarities are also quite apparent in history,
with scientific rebels pondering over why art,
like science, should not be an avenue for the
creation and reduction of evidence. Now, more
and more collaborations between artists and
neuroscientists are materializing, inferring that
the dichotomies that once defined and divided
them have been blurred – if not dissolved –
beyond recognition. A historical and
anthropological analysis of art and science also
uncovers the intrinsic meld that has always
linked the two pursuits. Western art, for
example, has often contorted to accommodate
and be informed by the breakthroughs and
epistemologies of contemporary science. The
advent of perspective in the works of such
Renaissance artists could not have been sprung
otherwise, since their own habitual recourse to
empirical observation and rational thinking
began a shift in the Western sensibility and
helped dismantle universally cherished
worldviews [3, 4]. Leonardo da Vinci, one of
the numerous 'Renaissance' men, was disciplined
as a painter and a sculptor but was widely
recognized for his designs of machines and
anatomical sketches. This body of work was
laudable to his peers because it involved the
"artwrights," as they deemed themselves, in a
prime form of mediation, as they were using
analogies grasped from one specialized and
esoteric field – the human body – to enhance the
problem solving of another – mechanical
engineering. Whether it was an attempt to
fabricate new substances by a complex
combination of chemical techniques that would
result in new substances or an attempt to create
a tapestry and homely conditions that will
traverse time without disparagement, science
operated not on "defining the evidence" alone
but on producing truthful, objective, real-time,
and 'perfect' evidence. This explains the ear that
persisted in the anatomy, the horn in the
composition, the intensification of angular
perspective in the camera, the nucleus in the
cell, the atom in the boundary of our material
existence, and why synthetic biologists are now
toying with the idea of the first genuinely
"engineered" living thing – a logic standardized
to a degree beyond the "harvested" humanity, as
we now realize, into the most universal stock of
cells. Whether they were cultural mores from
the Renaissance or modernist ploys in the
twenties, what artistic consortium
photographed in their mannequin "anatomies" –
neoteric anthropology, if you will –
contemptuously proposes that the man of steel
is more fractured and in need of complicity
against a backdrop of mechanistic uniformity in
Western habits of representing the state of the
art than is readily fathomable [5, 6].
Innovations in Art and Science: Mutual Influences
Scientific advances have always inspired artists
and designers, helping to open up new forms of
expression and expand technical and aesthetic
possibilities. Innovations in art can also
contribute to new scientific developments.
Knowledge of how the visual parts of our brains
process the world can, for instance, lead to new
forms of displays in the entertainment industry.
From Van Gogh’s depiction of the cosmos to
Escher’s exploration of infinity geometries, and
from the Beatles’ foray eastward for help with
their music to artists pioneering digital media,
the connections between the phenomenal
expanse of artistic creativity expressed through
music, painting, sculpture, and interactive
installations that we refer to as art and some
parts of the cutting edge of technological
endeavor have been intimate, intense, and often
transformative [7, 8]. Insight can strike
anytime while we connect unrelated ideas. The
way that artists have juxtaposed unrelated
images for centuries to produce new
perspectives can provide new ways of seeing a
pathway between data and biomolecules.
Scientists, too, are often driven by well-defined
aims and hypotheses similar to those of the most
rigorous researchers across the physical and
biological sciences. Indeed, the drive to discover
is inseparably accompanied by the use of the
imagination rediscovered formally by both
inquiry-based art and design and its
incorporation into science. The term 'process' is
not intended to rationalize science in image or
tool but rather to highlight the dynamic,
interactive aspects of the methodologies needed
for success in both disciplines. Artists and
designers are regularly employing scientific
methods in their work, working within an
inquiry-based context. Scientific advances, such
as the systematic recording of visual
phenomena, have even resulted, in or been
employed directly, in new work by artists.
These artists become employed as visualists in
scientific discoveries, where the sense of seeing
inspires the question [9, 10].

13
Technological Advancements and Artistic Expression
Over time, new technology has consistently
altered the ways in which art can be created.
The camera, for example, made the art of
technical drawing obsolete and changed the
course of painting by freeing artists from having
to make works of photo-realistic detail. More
recently, the rise of digital tools and media has
brought about a new era in art, with the most
striking example of this likely being the shift
from 2D animation to 3D animation in films.
Similarly, a surge in the popularity of digital art
tools has opened up these media to a new
audience that can explore art without the
constraint of permanent materials and limited
resources. This relationship between artistic
movements and new technological tools reveals
the creative advantage of new tools and how
they have the potential to alter the environment
in which the art is created. In the same sense
that new technological tools often catalyze the
development of a new form of art, they can also
expand the physical and psychological limits
beyond preconceived notions of what is possible.
Much of the contemporary art world is filled
with examples of technological tools that not
only aid the artist's work but at times fully
spawn the art piece itself in what may be
described as an immersive environment for any
individual present. Advances in technology have
also connected with the rise of new scientific
ideas and technological breakthroughs that
initiated new styles and fields of research. It is
also possible through studying the relationship
between artists and their use of the technology
of the era, to see how technology and art have
both influenced one another jointly in the task
of creativity and representation, then return to
the original norm in another period of stability
[11, 12].
Contemporary Examples of Collaboration Between Artists and Scientists
Art and science collaborations in contemporary
society are critical because of how unique they
are. With these projects, artists can make people
more aware of an issue, provide alternative ways
of examining it, or give form to what scientists
are discovering. Here are a couple of examples
[13, 14]. Brandon Ballengée’s Love Motel for
Insects is an environmental art installation that
has traveled the globe. The piece uses
ultraviolet lights to attract nocturnal insects
and serves as a portable field station to catalog
them. Ballengée has contributed many new
species records to the scientific literature and
has described several new species that he
discovered only because of this attention to the
group. The entrance fee for the Love Motel
often supports a local environmental cause, and
Ballengée maintains that the motivation behind
his work is often to “inspire people who see it to
walk out of the show and have a newfound
appreciation for insects.” Biologists often try to
fulfill this same educational goal, but our art
isn’t as pretty to look at. Works are above at a
nature museum and a hall of science [15, 16].
The Situating Noxious Commons project
collage combines an image of noxious weeds in
Lethbridge, Alberta, with a stylized graph
plotting the invasiveness of a species compared
to two other biocontrol agents. In the ongoing
Situating Noxious Commons project,
philosopher Joseph Lauwerys, biologists Cam
Goater and Dan Johnson, and artists Alex Link
and Lee Simmons have made qualitative
assessments of human tolerance and assistance
at an invasive insect agents’ workshop, and a
mixed media print with illustrations blending
the artists’ vision of the species, socially liminal
spaces, and wildly growing plants with a
stylized graph plotting the invasiveness of the
species compared to two other biocontrol agents
[17, 18].
CONCLUSION
The relationship between artistic movements
and scientific discoveries exemplifies the
interconnectedness of human creativity and
intellectual inquiry. Art and science, often
viewed as distinct, are shown to converge in
transformative ways, inspiring breakthroughs
that shape cultural and technological
landscapes. Historical examples, such as
Renaissance art's use of empirical observation or
modern collaborations between digital artists
and neuroscientists, reveal how these disciplines
anticipate and inform one another. Recognizing
this synergy encourages a rethinking of
disciplinary boundaries and promotes
interdisciplinary approaches to solving
contemporary challenges. By fostering
dialogues between artists and scientists, we can
unlock new pathways for innovation, creativity,
and a deeper understanding of the world. This
study emphasizes the potential of this
relationship to inspire future generations and
drive progress in both fields.

14
REFERENCES
1. Galenson DW. The two life cycles of
artistic creativity. Historically
Speaking. 2007;8(3):28-30.
2. Zikirov MC, Qosimova SF, Qosimov
LM. Direction of modern design
activities. Asian Journal of
Multidimensional Research (AJMR).
2021;10(2):11-8. [HTML]
3. Hanckel B, Shepherd A.
Representations of gender
categorizations: Examining the ways
that young people re-curate gender in
an urban science art gallery. Journal of
Gender Studies. 2024 Jul 3;33(5):541-
59.
4. Grafton A. Philological and artisanal
knowledge making in renaissance
natural history: a study in cultures of
knowledge. History of Humanities.
2018 Mar 1;3(1):39-55.
5. Kemp M. Revisiting Leonardo on
Muscles: Intimations of Mathematical
Biology and Biomechanics. Biological
Theory. 2023 Mar;18(1):7-19.
6. Marusic I, Broomhall S. Leonardo da
Vinci and fluid mechanics. Annual
Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2021 Jan
5;53(1):1-25.
7. Stella F, Hughes J. The science of soft
robot design: A review of motivations,
methods and enabling technologies.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2023 Jan
18;9:1059026.
8. Lee LH, Lin Z, Hu R, Gong Z, Kumar
A, Li T, Li S, Hui P. When creators
meet the metaverse: A survey on
computational arts. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2111.13486. 2021 Nov 26.
9. Blanka C, Krumay B, Rueckel D. The
interplay of digital transformation and
employee competency: A design science
approach. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change. 2022 May
1;178:121575. sciencedirect.com
10. de Paula Ferreira W, Armellini F, De
Santa-Eulalia LA. Simulation in
industry 4.0: A state-of-the-art review.
Computers & Industrial Engineering.
2020 Nov 1;149:106868. etsmtl.ca
11. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Khan
S, Suman R. Blockchain technology
applications for Industry 4.0: A
literature-based review. Blockchain:
Research and Applications. 2021 Dec
1;2(4):100027. sciencedirect.com
12. Lund BD, Wang T, Mannuru NR, Nie
B, Shimray S, Wang Z. ChatGPT and a
new academic reality: Artificial
Intelligence‐written research papers
and the ethics of the large language
models in scholarly publishing. Journal
of the Association for Information
Science and Technology. 2023
May;74(5):570-81. [PDF]
13. Boice KL, Jackson JR, Alemdar M, Rao
AE, Grossman S, Usselman M.
Supporting teachers on their STEAM
journey: A collaborative STEAM
teacher training program. Education
Sciences. 2021 Mar 5;11(3):105.
mdpi.com
14. Burnett C. Talismans: Magic as
Science? Necromancy among the Seven
Liberal Arts 1. InMagic and Divination
in the Middle Ages 2024 Oct 28 (pp. I-
1). Routledge.
15. Ballengee-Morris C, Sanders J, Smith
D, Staikidis K. Decolonizing
development through indigenous
artist-led inquiry. Journal of Social
Theory in Art Education.
2010;30(1):60-82.
16. Bienvenue V, Chare N, editors.
Animals, Plants and Afterimages: The
Art and Science of Representing
Extinction. Berghahn Books; 2022 Mar
11.
17. Irons E. The Next Epoch Seed
Library’s Lawn Lab: A Public
Experiment in Collaboration with
Seeds, Time, and Weeds. Media+
Environment. 2020 Aug 5;2(1).
18. Sledmere M. Meadowing in Common:
Towards a Poethics of Overgrowth.
Postmodern Culture. 2022;33(1).

15
CITE AS: Okwerede Emmanuel (2024). The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and
Scientific Discoveries. IDOSR JOURNAL OF ARTS AND MANAGEMENT 9(2):11-15.
https://doi.org/10.59298/IDOSRJAM/2024/9.2.11150

The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and Scientific Discoveries (www.kiu.ac.ug)

More Related Content

Similar to The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and Scientific Discoveries (www.kiu.ac.ug) (20)

More from publication11 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

The Relationship Between Artistic Movements and Scientific Discoveries (www.kiu.ac.ug)