Topology Optimization of Gears from Two Wheeler Gear Set Using Parametric Study

IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE)
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 14, Issue 1 Ver. II (Jan. - Feb. 2017), PP 22-31
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1401022231 www.iosrjournals.org 22 | Page
Topology Optimizationof Gears fromTwoWheelerGearSet Using
ParametricStudy
Vaibhav Pimpalte1
, Prof. S.C. Shilwant2
1
(PG Scholar, PG Scholar, Sinhgad Academy of Engineering/ University of Pune, Maharashtra, India)
2
(Professor, Sinhgad Academy of Engineering/ University of Pune, Maharashtra, India)
Abstract: Gears are used to transmit motion from on shaft to another and it has wide variety of applications.
One of the applications of gear is in automobile gear box. Gears generally fail when the working stress exceeds
the maximum permissible stress. These stresses are proportional to the amount of power transmitted by the
gears. This project intends to identify the magnitude of the stresses for a given configuration of a two wheeler
gears transmitting power while trying to find ways for reducing weight of the gear. The philosophy for driving
this work is the lightness of the gear for a given purpose while keeping intact its functionality thus reducing the
material cost of the gear. Ease of incorporating the new feature for weight reduction over the existing process
of manufacturing and the magnitude of volume of weight reduced could be considered as the key parameters for
assessment for this work.
Keywords: Weight optimization, FEA, Spur Gear, Two Wheeler Gear set
I. Introduction
Mechanical design can be defined as the selection of materials and geometry, which satisfies, specified
and implied functional requirements. The method of design has to minimize the most significant undesirable
effect and to maximize the most significant desirable effect. Gears are used for a wide range of industrial
applications. They have varied application starting from textile looms to aviation industries. [1] They are the
most common means of transmitting power. They change the rate of rotation of machinery shaft and also the
axis of rotation. For high speed machinery, such as an automobile transmission, they are the optimal medium for
low energy loss and high accuracy. [2] Their function is to convert input provided by prime mover into an
output with lower speed and corresponding higher torque or vice-versa. Effective gear design contains Strength,
durability, reliability, size, weight and cost.
In this study, gears from two wheeler gear set are analyzed for static loading under the application of
tangential load resulting from maximum torque in the given application. After studying the stress distribution on
baseline gears, weight reduction areas are identified on given gears and geometrical features are added on the
gear to reduce the weight. Static analysis is conducted on the optimized gears under the application of same
loading and comparative results are presented about stress distribution between baseline and optimized gears
and weight reduction is outlined for each gear of gear set.
II. Generalized Gear System in Two Wheeler
Figure 1 below shows the assembly for complete gear transmission system for automobile two wheeler
pedal operated system. It uses 5 pairs of spur gear system. From 1st
to 5th
continuously speed of the vehicle is
increased. Gear shift pedal is used to shift the gears and sequence of gear changing is shown in the image below.
Figure 1: Foot Pedal Operated Gear Transmission System of Two Wheeler

TopologyOptimizationofGearsfromTwoWheelerGearSetUsingParametricStudy
A = Gear Shift Pedal
B = Kick Starter
C = main and clutch shaft
D & F = Shift forks
E = shift cam
G = Start and counter shaft
H = cam shaft with linkage for shift cam
Most manual transmission two-wheelers use a sequential gearbox. Most modern motorcycles (except
scooters) change gears (of which they increasingly have five or six) by foot lever. On a typical motorcycle either
first or second gear can be directly selected from neutral, but higher gears may only be accessed in order – it is
not possible to shift from second gear to fourth gear without shifting through third gear. A five-speed of this
configuration would be known as "one down, four up" because of the placement of the gears with relation to
neutral. Neutral is to be found "half a click" away from first and second gears, so shifting directly between the
two gears can be made in a single movement.
III. Gear Geometry and Material Properties
3.1 Gear Geometry
For this study, actual gear set consisting of four gears is considered and CAD model is created by measuring the
basic dimensions of each gear in CATIA software.
Figure 2: Existing Gear Set
Figure 3: Existing (Baseline) First Gear
Figure 4: Existing (Baseline) Second Gear

Figure 5: Existing (Baseline) Third Gear
Figure 6: Existing (Baseline) Fourth Gear
3.2 Material Properties
For this study, gear material Steel Grade 50C8 is used. Material Properties of 50C8 steel are shown in below
table
Table 1: Material Properties
Material Properties
Ultimate Tensile Strength (σut) 965-1030 MPa
Compressive Strength (σc) 862 MPa
Young’s Modulus (E) 190-210 GPa
Considering the design margin of 3, allowable tensile stress will be 321 MPa.
IV. Finite Element Analysis of Baseline Design
To conduct the FEA analysis, we need geometry of gears, boundary conditions and loads to be applied on gears.
4.1 Geometry of Baseline Design
Basic Dimensions of the gear are measured from the actual gear models and CAD model is created in CATIA
software through reverse engineering.
4.2 Boundary Conditions
Finite Element model is meshed using tetrahedral element of size 3 mm maximum and 1 to 0.5 mm in the
loading areas and tooth areas for precise results. Other boundary conditions such as fixed support at the inner
rim and frictionless support at two faces with loading conditions are shown in below figure.
4.3 Static Load
FEA is performed on the gears by calculating the load on the gear resulting from maximum torque condition
(10.35 N-m) and applying the calculated load to the one individual teeth of the gear. Stresses on the gears are
observed and confirmed to be within the acceptance criteria of 321 MPa.
4.4 FEA Analysis of Baseline Gears
All four gears are analyzed considering the above mentioned loads and boundary conditions.

Figure 7 CAD model of 1st
baseline gear
Figure 8 Von Mises stress plot of 1st
baseline gear
Figure 9 CAD model of 2nd
baseline gear
Figure 10 Von Mises stress plot of 2nd
baseline gear

Figure 11 CAD model of 3rd
baseline gear
Figure 12 Von Mises stress plot of 3rd
baseline gear
Figure 13 CAD model of 4th
baseline gear
Figure 14 Von Mises stress plot of 4th
baseline gear

Table 2: Stress Values and Weight – Baseline Gears
Gear Stress values
(MPa)
Weight (Kg)
Gear-1 55.92 0.263
Gear-2 105 0.2
Gear-3 76.74 0.133
Gear-4 116..5 0.104
The stress values found from the FEA analysis of baselines gears are well within the acceptance limit
of 321 MPa. Also looking at the gears geometries, there is scope of design optimization by removing materials
from the existing gears. Hence it is decided to look for an opportunity to modify the design for weight reduction
without impacting the basic functions of gears.
V. Gear Design Optimization
5.1 Design Optimization of first gear
Even though the stresses observed in the baseline first gear are low, it can be seen from geometry of the gear
that it is already optimized without any further scope of weight reduction. Hence it is decided to not modify the
design of the first gear.
5.2 Design Optimization of Second gear
Stresses observed in the baseline second gear are well below than the acceptance criteria of 321 MPa
and it can be seen that there is a lot of scope of removing material from the geometry of the second baseline
gear.
Projections provided on the gear are required and do the important function of assembly of second and third
gears; hence we will not change these projections. However, there are low stress regions on the gear which are
not important for the gear for functioning or for assembly and materials can be removed from these regions for
gear optimization. Below figures shows the design optimization of second gear.
Figure 15 Iteration1-Design optimization sketch of second gear
Figure 16 Iteration1- Design optimization of second gear

Figure 17 Iteration1- Von Mises stress plot of second gear
Maximum stress observed in the gear is 125 MPa which is well within the acceptance criteria of 321
MPa, so next iteration is performed and further material is removed in the similar pattern by increasing the size
of the patterns of material removal. Mass of the Iteration 1 of second gear is 0.179 kg.In iteration2, we will
remove some more material from the ieration1 model as stress values from iteration1 are still within the
acceptance criteria.
Figure 18 Iteration2-Design Optimization sketch of second gear
Figure 19 Iteration2- Design Optimization of second gear
Figure 20 Iteration2- Von Mises stress plot of second gear

Maximum stress observed in the gear is 122.07 MPa which is well within the acceptance criteria of 321
MPa but as can be seen from the geometry of iteration2 gear, there is not further scope of material removal
hence it is decided to finalize this iteration. Mass of the Iteration 2 of second gear is 0.168 kg.
5.3 Design Optimization of Third gear
Stresses observed on baseline third gear are well below the acceptance criteria hence it is decided to optimize
the design of third gear. Below figures shows the design optimization of third gear.
Figure 21 Iteration1-Design optimization of third gear
Figure 22 Iteration1- Von Mises stress plot of third gear
Maximum von Mises stress observed in iteration1 optimization of third gear is 83.882 MPa which is
within the acceptance criteria of 321 MPa. There is further scope for material removal to reduce the weight of
this gear. Figures below shows deign iteration 2 of third gear.
Figure 23 Iteration2-Design Optimization of third gear
Figure 24 Iteration2- Von Mises stress plot of third gear

Stresses observed in iteration 2 of third gear are 80.34 MPa. As it can be seen in the gear design of
iteration 3 there is no more space to remove further material from the gear without affecting the assembly
purpose, hence it is decided to not further reduce material from this gear. Total weight of iteration 2 design of
third gear is observed as 0.111 kg.
5.4 Design Optimization of Fourth gear
In the gear 4 baseline design FEA results, we have observed that maximum stress that is observed in
the gear due to torque at one tooth is 116.5 MPa. Maximum stress is well within the acceptance criteria for the
gear material of 321 MPa. It can be seen from the Stress plot that there is good possibility of removing material
without affecting the gear’s capacity to withstand the torque. Iteration 1 design is generated by removing some
material from the recess observed in baseline design. Figures below shows design iterations for optimization of
fourth gear.
Figure 25 Iteration1-Design optimization of fourth gear
Figure 26 Iteration1- Von Mises stress plot of fourth gear
Iteration 1design FEA shows that maximum stress observed at the gear is 130.57 MPa. Maximum
stress is within the acceptance criteria and there is still more scope to remove material without disturbing
assembly and purpose of the gear. Hence, iteration 2 will be performed to remove further more material from
the current design.
Figure 27 Iteration2-Design optimization of fourth gear

Figure 28 Iteration2- Von Mises stress plot of fourth gear
Iteration 2 FEA shows that maximum stress observed at the gear is 129 MPa. Maximum stress is
within the acceptance criteria but there is no more scope to remove material without disturbing assembly and
purpose of the gear. Hence, it is decided not to further modify the geometry of gear. Mass of the Iteration 2
design is 0.0875 kg.
VI. Results & Discussion
Comparative results between baseline design and optimized design is shown below in table 3 and 4.
Table 3: Comparative results between Baseline and Optimized Design (Stress Values)
Gear Baseline
Design- Stress
values (MPa)
Optimized
Design- Stress
Values (MPa)
% Increase in
stresses
Gear-1 55.92 - -
Gear-2 105 122.07 16.25
Gear-3 76.74 80.34 4.69
Gear-4 116..5 129 10.72
Table 4: Comparative results between Baseline and Optimized Design (Weight)
Gear Baseline
Design- Weight
(Kg)
Optimized
Design-
Weight (Kg)
% Decrease in
weight
Gear-1 0.263 - -
Gear-2 0.2 0.168 16
Gear-3 0.133 0.111 16.54
Gear-4 0.104 0.0875 15.86
As can be seen from results tables 3 &4, there is significant weight reduction is possible on gear 2, 3 & 4 under
the application of static loading without much affecting the functionality of the gear and keeping the stresses
within the acceptable limit.
VII. Conclusion
This paper showcases a general view of mass optimization of spur gear under static loading. It states
Finite element analysis method for the spur gear tooth using ANSYS 16. It further studies the mass of spur gear
with inclusion of different geometries. The results show that, it is possible to reduce the weight of these gears
without much increase in stresses and keeping the functionality of gears intact.
References
[1]. Mr. Bhatt Parth Jitendrabhai “A Review on Design, Analysis and Material Optimization of High Speed Helical Gear by Changing
Different Design Parameters Using FEA Approach”, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology.
[2]. Sarfraz Ali N. Quadri, Dhanajay R. Dolas “Mass Reduction of Involute Spur Gear under Static Loading “American Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Automation.
[3]. Mr. S. Padmanabhan, Mr. S. Ganeshan, Mr. M. Chandrasekaran, and Mr. V. Srinivasa Raman, “Gear Pair Design Optimization by
Genetic Algorithm and FEA”, Department Of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India.
[4]. Mr. Sa'id Golabi, Mr. Javad Jafari Fesharaki, Mrs. Maryam Yazdipoor “Gear Train Optimization Based On Minimum
Volume/Weight Design by Using the Mat lab Program” Mechanism And Machine Theory 73 (2014) 197–217.
[5]. Mr. Nenad Marjanovic, Mr. Biserka Isailovic, Mr. Vesna Marjanovic, Mr. Zoran Milojevic, Mr. Mirko Blagojevic, Mr. Milorad
Bojic “A Practical Approach To The Optimization Of Gear Trains With Spur Gears” Mechanism And Machine Theory 53 (2012)
1–16.
[6]. Mr. Ram Krishna Rathore And Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, “Bending Stress Analysis & Optimization Of Spur Gear”, International
Journal Of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 3 Issue 5, May – 2014, Issn: 2278-0181 Vol. 3 Issue 5.
[7]. Mohd. Muzammil, Prem Pal Singh and Faisal Talib, “Optimization of Gear Blank Casting Process by Using Taguchi’s Robust
Design Technique”, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
[8]. P B Pawar ,Abhay A Utpat “Analysis of Composite Material Spur Gear under Static loading Condition” , SVPM’s ITE Malegaon
(BK), Baramati.

Topology Optimization of Gears from Two Wheeler Gear Set Using Parametric Study

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (17)

Similar to Topology Optimization of Gears from Two Wheeler Gear Set Using Parametric Study (20)

More from IOSRJMCE (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Topology Optimization of Gears from Two Wheeler Gear Set Using Parametric Study