Experiential Education
- A Learning Journey
Rob Macpherson, Network Leader, Tourism, Leisure & Sport
Rhiannon Tinsley, Assistant Registrar
Location
Vineyard
Haven
The Institute
“Reflective Practice in
Experiential Education”
With Joe Raelin
Center for Work and Learning
Northeastern University
June 27, 2008
A Formative Exercise in Real-Time
The 2008 Martha’s Vineyard Summer Institute
Our Colleagues
Our Mentor
Dr. Paul J. Stonely
Chief Executive Officer
World Association for Co-operative
Education
Our objective for the end of the workshop was:
“to produce a plan for better
integration of experiential
education within UHI”
Process
♦ Goals
♦ Needs
♦ Objectives
♦ Methods
♦ Evaluation
PLANNING GNOME
Gnome Planning
♦ G- oals “Big picture”
♦ N- eeds 3 prong
♦ O-bjectives Action Language
♦ M-ethods The nitty-gritty
♦ E-valuation Critical and often not
part of the planning
process
Programme
Participants
Institution
Who benefits?
PROGRAMME
Evaluation surveys
Smile sheets
Interviews
Focus groups
LEARNING
Student case studies
Video-taped lessons
Observations/shadowing
Links with industry
INSTITUTION
Match with mission
Grades improve
Statistics – graduation rates
Post graduation employability
Experiential
Education
Job
Shadowing
Simulations
Study
Abroad
Work
Placement
Summer
Schools
Internship
Field
Trips
Research
Projects
Volunteering
Service
Learning
Guest
Lectures
Clinical
Practice
Co-operative
Education
Capstone
Course
Case
Studies
Community
Engagement
Objective
Can thesebe
combined?
ExperienceExperienceClassroomClassroom
ExperienceExperienceClassroomClassroom
Integrating Learning
Objective
Explicit
Knowledge
Retrievable Tacit Knowledge
Non-retrievable Tacit Knowledge
Start of the Week
?
End of the Week
?
End of the Week
So why do it?
Experiential learning is the process
whereby knowledge is created
through the transformation of
experience.
Experiential Learning
So why do it?
Key Principles
• Integrated Learning
– provide educationally sound learning strategies to maximize community learning opportunities while and realizing course learning objectives
– minimize distinction between students’ community learning role and classroom learning role
• High Quality Service
– do not compromise academic rigor
• Collaboration
– establish criteria for selection of service placements to match learning objectives
• Student Voice
– be prepared for variation in, and some loss of control with, student learning outcomes
• Civic Engagement
– maximize the community orientation and community responsibility components of course
– prepare students for learning from community
• Reflection
– rethink the instructional role of staff
• Assessment & Evaluation
– academic credit is for learning outcomes, not service
Benefits
Student Benefits
• Increased reported learning and motivation to learn
• Deeper understanding of subject matter and complex social issues
• Ability to apply material learned in class to “real world” issues
• Opportunity to learn from classmates experiences
• Gain hands on skills related to academic and professional area of
interest
Staff Benefits
• Addition of new areas for research and publication, and increased
opportunities for professional recognition and reward
• Improved student discussion and participation
• Enriched approach for delivering subject matter
• Increased opportunity to engage students of all learning styles
• New relationship with students and community members
• Improved understanding of how learning occurs
• Greater awareness of social issues as they relate to academic areas
of interest
Benefits
Community Benefits
• Additional energy, enthusiasm and resources for addressing issues
• Improved relationship with university and access to university resources
• Increased awareness of and support for community organizations and
issues
• Opportunity to impress upon students the importance of participation in
service
• Opportunity to recruit and nurture future volunteers, interns, coops, and
full employees or advocates
University Benefits
• Increased opportunity to engage students of all learning styles
• Opportunity to be a model Service-Learning program for other universities
• Improved student retention and school to work transition
• Access to community partners as potential co-teachers
• Improve awareness of universities commitment to the community
Beneficiaries
Learning Focus
Primary Intended Beneficiary
R
e
c
i
p
i
e
n
t
L
e
a
r
n
e
r
Field-trips
Service-Learning
Community
Engagement
Volunteering
(Furco & Duffy 2005)
Internships
Process
Experiential Education is an academically rigorous educational
activity in which students:
1) participate in organized service activities/project(s) that meet
needs identified by the community
2) reflect on the service activities/project(s) in such a way as to gain
further understanding of course/programme content, a broader
appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civic
responsibility. (Bringle & Hatcher, 1995)
Process
The theory can be expanded to reflect Kolb’s
Learning Circle.
Reflection
Action PlanAction Plan
If it arose again,If it arose again,
what would you do?what would you do?
DescribeDescribe
What happened?What happened?
What were you thinking andWhat were you thinking and
feeling?feeling?
EvaluateEvaluate
What was good/badWhat was good/bad
about theabout the
experience?experience?
AnalysisAnalysis
What sense can you make of this? WhatWhat sense can you make of this? What
were your biases, assumptions?were your biases, assumptions?
Are they true?Are they true?
AlternativesAlternatives
What else could have youWhat else could have you
done?done?
Reflective Learner
Reflective learners are more likely to be:
– more self-aware and self-critical
– motivated to improve
– more able to carry through
independent learning
(Oxford University, 2005)
Types of Reflection
• Reading: Literature & Written material
case studies, books, professional journals, poems
• Writing: Written exercises
blogging, journaling, essays, self-evaluations, creating
portfolios, analysis paper, poems, case studies, song lyrics
• Doing: Projects & Activities
role playing, video development, musical performance,
analyzing/creating budgets, watch & debrief related movie
• Telling: Oral exercises
informal/formal discussions, storytelling, teaching a class,
presentations, legislative testimony, debate
Opportunities for students to demonstrate
knowledge and for you to evaluate what they
have learned
Key Principles
• Continuous
Reflection should be ongoing, occurring before, during and after students'
experiences.
• Connected
Reflection provides opportunity to integrate learning from experience within
the academic content or personal development, including ways in which the
experiences illustrate concepts, theories and trends.
• Challenging
Reflection both supports and challenges students to engage issues by
thinking critically, pushing them to pose stimulating questions and to
develop alternative explanations for their initial perceptions and
observations of their experiences.
• Contextualized
Reflection relies on the analysis of the context of the issues being
discussed and the setting. It occurs in various forms and settings.
(Eyler, Giles, & Schmiede, 1996)
Assessment
Assessment should be:
• on-going
• aimed at understanding and improving
learning
• makes expectations explicit and public
• sets appropriate standards for learning quality
• systematically gathers, analyzes, and
interprets evidence
• uses the results to document/explain/improve
performance
• assessment ≠ evaluation
(Angelo, 1996)
Assessment Spiral
SET LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Assessment Spiral
GATHER DATA
ANALYZE DATA
DESIGN ASSESSMENT
MEASURES
SET NEW LEARNING OBJECTIVES
DESIGN NEW MEASURES
GATHER NEW DATA
Define
Outcomes
Challenges
To integrate experiential education
effectively within a wide range of
programmes, there are a number
of challenges (or barriers) which
have to be overcome.
Challenges
• Logistics – student numbers
• Logistics – experiential placement site numbers
• Negotiations of goals/objectives between external
agency and the students
• Town/gown barriers
• Time commitment of all parties – students, staff and
community partners
• Ethical challenges
• Balancing integration of students’ personal feelings
about workplace and/or social issues (of which they
often become aware of during the reflective process)
with the academic learning they need to express to be
evaluated
Challenges
• Finding appropriate placements for the course
• Impact on student funding of placement study
• Impact on staff in determining more effective tools for
assessment and evaluation
• Varied levels of commitment among students and/or
partners
• Short and long-term effects on the external agency viz
future relationship; future placement opportunities;
future employment opportunities
• Communication of challenges in timely manner
• Poor implementation of best practice by student, staff
and/or partners
Solutions?
All of our colleagues at Martha’s Vineyard came from
institutions with a specific department/unit that looked after
experiential education and co-ordinated placement study.
In the main, these were independent of any particular
faculty and were not large – 2-5 staff.
All their institutions saw them as customer facing (be it
students or external partners) and a significant part of their
community engagement activity.
Currently, experiential education within UHI is conducted
on a programme-by-programme basis. This may prove
challenging if experiential learning is to be integrated in a
meaningful way post modularisation.
Northeastern
At Northeastern, the service-learning unit provides
technical assistance and resources to all academic
departments such as:
a. identifying appropriate partners
b. acting as initial liaison with partners
c. administration, resources & forms (work permits)
d. orientating students and partners
e. providing best practice tools for reflection, evaluation
and assessment
f. facilitating validation, assessment & evaluation process
g. staff development – funding conferences/workshops
h. staff training and support (teaching assistants)
i. providing student support – references, portfolios,
documentation, curriculum vitarum, awards, etc.
j. accessing grants and other funding for students
k. developing university-wide tracking/reporting mechanism
and interactive web portal to support students/partners
UHI
Barriers to Implementation
• Lack of clarity of purpose
• Lack of support for the project
– Allies
– Foes
– Fence sitters
• Lack of resources
• Changing Personnel
The way
forward…?
Job
Shadowing
Simulations
Study
Abroad
Work
Placement
Summer
Schools
Internship
Field
Trips
Research
Projects
Volunteering
Service
Learning
Guest
Lectures
Clinical
Practice
Co-operative
Education
Capstone
Course
Case
Studies
Community
Engagement
References
Thanks are due to the following:
(some of whose slides have been mercilessly pilfered)
• Donna Qualters, Suffolk University
• Joe Raelin, Northeastern University
• Rick Porter, Northeastern University
• Kristen Simonelli, Northeastern University
• Kate McLaughlin, Northeastern University
• Jim Stellar, Northeastern University
• Tim Donovan, Northeastern University
and the colleagues of the other six institutions at MVSI.

UHI Millennium Institute, HoTLS, Experiential Education Presentation, 2008

  • 1.
    Experiential Education - ALearning Journey Rob Macpherson, Network Leader, Tourism, Leisure & Sport Rhiannon Tinsley, Assistant Registrar
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    “Reflective Practice in ExperientialEducation” With Joe Raelin Center for Work and Learning Northeastern University June 27, 2008 A Formative Exercise in Real-Time The 2008 Martha’s Vineyard Summer Institute
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Our Mentor Dr. PaulJ. Stonely Chief Executive Officer World Association for Co-operative Education Our objective for the end of the workshop was: “to produce a plan for better integration of experiential education within UHI”
  • 7.
    Process ♦ Goals ♦ Needs ♦Objectives ♦ Methods ♦ Evaluation PLANNING GNOME
  • 8.
    Gnome Planning ♦ G-oals “Big picture” ♦ N- eeds 3 prong ♦ O-bjectives Action Language ♦ M-ethods The nitty-gritty ♦ E-valuation Critical and often not part of the planning process Programme Participants Institution
  • 9.
    Who benefits? PROGRAMME Evaluation surveys Smilesheets Interviews Focus groups LEARNING Student case studies Video-taped lessons Observations/shadowing Links with industry INSTITUTION Match with mission Grades improve Statistics – graduation rates Post graduation employability
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    End of theWeek ?
  • 15.
  • 16.
    So why doit? Experiential learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience. Experiential Learning
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Key Principles • IntegratedLearning – provide educationally sound learning strategies to maximize community learning opportunities while and realizing course learning objectives – minimize distinction between students’ community learning role and classroom learning role • High Quality Service – do not compromise academic rigor • Collaboration – establish criteria for selection of service placements to match learning objectives • Student Voice – be prepared for variation in, and some loss of control with, student learning outcomes • Civic Engagement – maximize the community orientation and community responsibility components of course – prepare students for learning from community • Reflection – rethink the instructional role of staff • Assessment & Evaluation – academic credit is for learning outcomes, not service
  • 19.
    Benefits Student Benefits • Increasedreported learning and motivation to learn • Deeper understanding of subject matter and complex social issues • Ability to apply material learned in class to “real world” issues • Opportunity to learn from classmates experiences • Gain hands on skills related to academic and professional area of interest Staff Benefits • Addition of new areas for research and publication, and increased opportunities for professional recognition and reward • Improved student discussion and participation • Enriched approach for delivering subject matter • Increased opportunity to engage students of all learning styles • New relationship with students and community members • Improved understanding of how learning occurs • Greater awareness of social issues as they relate to academic areas of interest
  • 20.
    Benefits Community Benefits • Additionalenergy, enthusiasm and resources for addressing issues • Improved relationship with university and access to university resources • Increased awareness of and support for community organizations and issues • Opportunity to impress upon students the importance of participation in service • Opportunity to recruit and nurture future volunteers, interns, coops, and full employees or advocates University Benefits • Increased opportunity to engage students of all learning styles • Opportunity to be a model Service-Learning program for other universities • Improved student retention and school to work transition • Access to community partners as potential co-teachers • Improve awareness of universities commitment to the community
  • 21.
    Beneficiaries Learning Focus Primary IntendedBeneficiary R e c i p i e n t L e a r n e r Field-trips Service-Learning Community Engagement Volunteering (Furco & Duffy 2005) Internships
  • 22.
    Process Experiential Education isan academically rigorous educational activity in which students: 1) participate in organized service activities/project(s) that meet needs identified by the community 2) reflect on the service activities/project(s) in such a way as to gain further understanding of course/programme content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility. (Bringle & Hatcher, 1995)
  • 23.
    Process The theory canbe expanded to reflect Kolb’s Learning Circle.
  • 24.
    Reflection Action PlanAction Plan Ifit arose again,If it arose again, what would you do?what would you do? DescribeDescribe What happened?What happened? What were you thinking andWhat were you thinking and feeling?feeling? EvaluateEvaluate What was good/badWhat was good/bad about theabout the experience?experience? AnalysisAnalysis What sense can you make of this? WhatWhat sense can you make of this? What were your biases, assumptions?were your biases, assumptions? Are they true?Are they true? AlternativesAlternatives What else could have youWhat else could have you done?done?
  • 25.
    Reflective Learner Reflective learnersare more likely to be: – more self-aware and self-critical – motivated to improve – more able to carry through independent learning (Oxford University, 2005)
  • 26.
    Types of Reflection •Reading: Literature & Written material case studies, books, professional journals, poems • Writing: Written exercises blogging, journaling, essays, self-evaluations, creating portfolios, analysis paper, poems, case studies, song lyrics • Doing: Projects & Activities role playing, video development, musical performance, analyzing/creating budgets, watch & debrief related movie • Telling: Oral exercises informal/formal discussions, storytelling, teaching a class, presentations, legislative testimony, debate Opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge and for you to evaluate what they have learned
  • 27.
    Key Principles • Continuous Reflectionshould be ongoing, occurring before, during and after students' experiences. • Connected Reflection provides opportunity to integrate learning from experience within the academic content or personal development, including ways in which the experiences illustrate concepts, theories and trends. • Challenging Reflection both supports and challenges students to engage issues by thinking critically, pushing them to pose stimulating questions and to develop alternative explanations for their initial perceptions and observations of their experiences. • Contextualized Reflection relies on the analysis of the context of the issues being discussed and the setting. It occurs in various forms and settings. (Eyler, Giles, & Schmiede, 1996)
  • 28.
    Assessment Assessment should be: •on-going • aimed at understanding and improving learning • makes expectations explicit and public • sets appropriate standards for learning quality • systematically gathers, analyzes, and interprets evidence • uses the results to document/explain/improve performance • assessment ≠ evaluation (Angelo, 1996)
  • 29.
    Assessment Spiral SET LEARNINGOBJECTIVES Assessment Spiral GATHER DATA ANALYZE DATA DESIGN ASSESSMENT MEASURES SET NEW LEARNING OBJECTIVES DESIGN NEW MEASURES GATHER NEW DATA Define Outcomes
  • 30.
    Challenges To integrate experientialeducation effectively within a wide range of programmes, there are a number of challenges (or barriers) which have to be overcome.
  • 31.
    Challenges • Logistics –student numbers • Logistics – experiential placement site numbers • Negotiations of goals/objectives between external agency and the students • Town/gown barriers • Time commitment of all parties – students, staff and community partners • Ethical challenges • Balancing integration of students’ personal feelings about workplace and/or social issues (of which they often become aware of during the reflective process) with the academic learning they need to express to be evaluated
  • 32.
    Challenges • Finding appropriateplacements for the course • Impact on student funding of placement study • Impact on staff in determining more effective tools for assessment and evaluation • Varied levels of commitment among students and/or partners • Short and long-term effects on the external agency viz future relationship; future placement opportunities; future employment opportunities • Communication of challenges in timely manner • Poor implementation of best practice by student, staff and/or partners
  • 33.
    Solutions? All of ourcolleagues at Martha’s Vineyard came from institutions with a specific department/unit that looked after experiential education and co-ordinated placement study. In the main, these were independent of any particular faculty and were not large – 2-5 staff. All their institutions saw them as customer facing (be it students or external partners) and a significant part of their community engagement activity. Currently, experiential education within UHI is conducted on a programme-by-programme basis. This may prove challenging if experiential learning is to be integrated in a meaningful way post modularisation.
  • 34.
    Northeastern At Northeastern, theservice-learning unit provides technical assistance and resources to all academic departments such as: a. identifying appropriate partners b. acting as initial liaison with partners c. administration, resources & forms (work permits) d. orientating students and partners e. providing best practice tools for reflection, evaluation and assessment f. facilitating validation, assessment & evaluation process g. staff development – funding conferences/workshops h. staff training and support (teaching assistants) i. providing student support – references, portfolios, documentation, curriculum vitarum, awards, etc. j. accessing grants and other funding for students k. developing university-wide tracking/reporting mechanism and interactive web portal to support students/partners
  • 35.
    UHI Barriers to Implementation •Lack of clarity of purpose • Lack of support for the project – Allies – Foes – Fence sitters • Lack of resources • Changing Personnel
  • 36.
  • 37.
    References Thanks are dueto the following: (some of whose slides have been mercilessly pilfered) • Donna Qualters, Suffolk University • Joe Raelin, Northeastern University • Rick Porter, Northeastern University • Kristen Simonelli, Northeastern University • Kate McLaughlin, Northeastern University • Jim Stellar, Northeastern University • Tim Donovan, Northeastern University and the colleagues of the other six institutions at MVSI.

Editor's Notes

  • #2 This presentation is a summary of some of the outcomes of the one-week Experiential Education workshop, undertaken by Rob Macpherson and Rhiannon Tinsley, in June/July 2008.
  • #3 Martha’s Vineyard is a small island lying off the southern coast of Massachusetts. Its main town – Vineyard Haven – was the base for the workshop.
  • #5 The workshop was co-ordinated by staff of Northeastern University, Boston. The keynote speaker was Joe Raelin.
  • #7 Copies of our final presentation are available to take away.
  • #8 Being from UHI, we ended up going for a “Qualified Gnome”!
  • #9 Being from UHI, we ended up going for a “Qualified Gnome”!
  • #10 Being from UHI, we ended up going for a “Qualified Gnome”!
  • #11 So what does Experiential Education cover?
  • #12 Experience adds an element of “actionability” to classroom education. (Don’t ask me what that means either!)
  • #13 Another way to describe the outcomes is to consider experiential education as one of the best ways to bring our students’ tacit knowledge to the surface to better enable learning
  • #14 At the start of the week, I – personally – was a little nervous that we (that is UHI) would have little to contribute to the workshop. Kerry had always talked so glowingly of how Canada (and the US) “did” experiential education, and held North American institutions up as an example of how we should be delivering education in C21st.
  • #15 By the end of the week, it had become clear than not only were we “doing” experiential education but that we were frequently: 1) putting the student learning experience at the centre of their education; 2) linking experiential education to key skills and graduate employability; 3) engaging in best practice; 4) innovating in terms of delivery models, assessment forms and practical application.
  • #16 What was also clear by the end of the week was that: 1) we are not badging what we are doing effectively enough and 2) we are not shouting about what we are doing!
  • #17 Hopefully, we are not going to teach any of you how to suck eggs. We know that most people in this room engage with their students in experiential learning on a daily (or at least regular) basis. Sometimes, however, it is good to reflect on the theory behind why we do some of the things we do – often without thinking about them.
  • #18 Active participation in an activity not only reinforces theory based learning, but stimulates students in ways far beyond book-based, classroom-based learning.
  • #22 Each type of experiential education has a different balance between the experience gained by the learner and the experience received by the recipient. What is important is the focus – and a co-ordinated approach to experiential education to ensure that the student is getting a rounded experience, without either exploiting or under-valuing the recipient.
  • #25 However you theorize the process of experiential education, the key activity for the learner is “Reflection”.
  • #37 So what does Experiential Education cover?