Supervised learning uses labeled training data to predict outcomes for new data. Unsupervised learning uses unlabeled data to discover patterns. Some key machine learning algorithms are described, including decision trees, naive Bayes classification, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machines. Performance metrics for classification problems like accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and specificity are discussed.
Boosting algorithms work by combining multiple weak learners to create a strong learner. Weak learners are models that are only slightly correlated with the true output. Boosting algorithms fit these weak learners in sequence, giving higher weight to observations that previous weak learners misclassified. This process converts weak learners into a strong learner. Common boosting algorithms include AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and XGBoost. Gradient boosting works by gradually minimizing a loss function to fit new models that correlate with the negative gradient of the previous models.
Ensemble methods like bagging, boosting, random forest and AdaBoost combine multiple classifiers to improve performance. Bagging aims to reduce variance by training classifiers on random subsets of data and averaging their predictions. Boosting sequentially trains classifiers to focus on misclassified examples from previous classifiers to reduce bias. Random forest extends bagging by randomly selecting features for training each decision tree. AdaBoost is a boosting algorithm that iteratively adds classifiers and assigns higher weights to misclassified examples.
One of the first uses of ensemble methods was the bagging technique. This technique was developed to overcome instability in decision trees. In fact, an example of the bagging technique is the random forest algorithm. The random forest is an ensemble of multiple decision trees. Decision trees tend to be prone to overfitting. Because of this, a single decision tree can’t be relied on for making predictions. To improve the prediction accuracy of decision trees, bagging is employed to form a random forest. The resulting random forest has a lower variance compared to the individual trees.
The success of bagging led to the development of other ensemble techniques such as boosting, stacking, and many others. Today, these developments are an important part of machine learning.
The many real-life machine learning applications show these ensemble methods’ importance. These applications include many critical systems. These include decision-making systems, spam detection, autonomous vehicles, medical diagnosis, and many others. These systems are crucial because they have the ability to impact human lives and business revenues. Therefore ensuring the accuracy of machine learning models is paramount. An inaccurate model can lead to disastrous consequences for many businesses or organizations. At worst, they can lead to the endangerment of human lives.
Are you ready to discover how machines learn better by working together? Dive into the world of Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking—three revolutionary techniques that redefine the boundaries of machine learning.
Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating): Learn how this technique tames complex models by reducing their variance and preventing overfitting. See how it creates multiple data subsets and combines the predictions for unbeatable stability and accuracy.
Boosting: Experience the magic of turning weak models into strong ones. Boosting focuses on correcting mistakes, assigning weights to misclassified data, and delivering powerful predictive models that outperform expectations.
Stacking (Stacked Generalization): Explore how this advanced method integrates predictions from diverse models into a meta-model, creating a final predictor that combines the strengths of all its components.
Whether you're a beginner or an enthusiast, this presentation simplifies complex ideas with visuals, analogies, and real-world examples. See how these ensemble methods revolutionize fields like healthcare, finance, and more.
#Bagging
#Boosting
#Stacking
#EnsembleLearning
#MachineLearning
#AdaBoost
#RandomForest
#GradientBoosting
#XGBoost
#LightGBM
#CatBoost
#WeakLearners
#StrongClassifiers
#SupervisedLearning
#VarianceReduction
#ModelAggregation
#DataSampling
#WeightedModels
#PredictionAccuracy
#ArtificialIntelligence
Ensemble learning combines multiple machine learning models to obtain better predictive performance than could be obtained from any of the constituent models alone. It works by training base models on different subsets of the original data or using different algorithms and then combining their predictions. Two common ensemble methods are bagging and boosting. Bagging generates additional training data by sampling the original data with replacement and trains base models on these samples, while boosting iteratively reweights training examples to focus on those misclassified by previous base models. Both aim to reduce variance and prevent overfitting.
This document discusses ensemble hybrid feature selection techniques. It begins by introducing feature selection and different types of feature selection techniques, including filter, wrapper, embedded, and hybrid methods. It then discusses ensembles and why they are used, describing various ensemble methods like bagging, boosting, Bayesian averaging, and stacking. It provides examples of how ensembles are applied to tasks like image classification, text categorization, and medical image analysis. Finally, it concludes that ensembles can outperform single learning algorithms and that future research could explore more hybrid ensemble approaches.
This document discusses computational intelligence and supervised learning techniques for classification. It provides examples of applications in medical diagnosis and credit card approval. The goal of supervised learning is to learn from labeled training data to predict the class of new unlabeled examples. Decision trees and backpropagation neural networks are introduced as common supervised learning algorithms. Evaluation methods like holdout validation, cross-validation and performance metrics beyond accuracy are also summarized.
In the rapidly evolving field of machine learning (ML), the focus is often placed on developing sophisticated algorithms and models that can learn patterns, make predictions, and generate insights from data. However, one of the most critical challenges in building effective machine learning systems lies in ensuring the quality of the data used for training, testing, and validating these models. Data quality directly influences the model's performance, accuracy, and ability to generalize to unseen examples. Unfortunately, in real-world applications, data is rarely perfect, and it is often riddled with various types of errors that can lead to misleading conclusions, flawed predictions, and potentially harmful outcomes. These errors in experimental observations, also referred to as data errors or measurement errors, can significantly compromise the effectiveness of machine learning systems. The sources of these errors are diverse, ranging from technical failures, such as malfunctioning sensors or corrupted datasets, to human errors in data collection, labeling, or interpretation. Furthermore, errors may emerge during the data preprocessing stages, such as incorrect normalization, improper handling of missing data, or the introduction of noise through faulty sampling techniques. These errors can manifest in several ways, including outliers, missing values, mislabeled instances, noisy data, or data imbalances, each of which can influence how well a machine learning model performs. Understanding the nature of these errors and developing strategies to mitigate their impact is crucial for building robust and reliable machine learning models that can operate in real-world environments. Moreover, the impact of errors is not only a technical issue; it also raises significant ethical concerns, particularly when the models are used to inform high-stakes decisions, such as in healthcare, criminal justice, or finance. If errors are not properly addressed, models may inadvertently perpetuate biases, amplify inequalities, or produce inaccurate predictions that negatively affect individuals and communities. Therefore, a thorough understanding of errors in experimental observations is essential for improving the reliability, fairness, and ethical standards of machine learning applications. This introductory discussion provides the foundation for exploring the various types of errors that arise in machine learning datasets, examining their origins, their effects on model performance, and the various methods and techniques available for detecting, correcting, and mitigating these errors. By delving into the challenges posed by errors in experimental observations, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework for addressing data quality issues in machine learning and to highlight the importance of maintaining data integrity in the development and deployment of machine learning systems. This exploration of errors will also touch upon the broader implications for research
IRJET- Evaluation of Classification Algorithms with Solutions to Class Imbala...IRJET Journal
This document discusses evaluating various classification algorithms to address class imbalance problems using the bank marketing dataset in WEKA. It first introduces data mining and classification algorithms like decision trees, naive Bayes, neural networks, support vector machines, logistic regression and random forests. It then discusses the class imbalance problem that occurs when one class is underrepresented. To address this, it explores sampling techniques like random under-sampling of the majority class, random over-sampling of the minority class, and SMOTE. It uses these techniques on the bank marketing dataset to evaluate the algorithms based on metrics like precision, recall, F1-score, ROC and AUCPR for the minority class.
This document provides an introduction to ensemble learning techniques. It defines ensemble learning as combining the predictions of multiple machine learning models. The main ensemble methods described are bagging, boosting, and voting. Bagging involves training models on random subsets of data and combining results by majority vote. Boosting iteratively trains models to focus on misclassified examples from previous models. Voting simply averages the predictions of different model types. The document discusses how these techniques are implemented in scikit-learn and provides examples of decision tree bagging on the Iris dataset.
The document discusses hyperparameters and hyperparameter tuning in deep learning models. It defines hyperparameters as parameters that govern how the model parameters (weights and biases) are determined during training, in contrast to model parameters which are learned from the training data. Important hyperparameters include the learning rate, number of layers and units, and activation functions. The goal of training is for the model to perform optimally on unseen test data. Model selection, such as through cross-validation, is used to select the optimal hyperparameters. Training, validation, and test sets are also discussed, with the validation set used for model selection and the test set providing an unbiased evaluation of the fully trained model.
A brief presentation given on the basics of Ensemble Methods. Given as a 'Lightning Talk' during the 7th Cohort of General Assembly's Data Science Immersive Course
Machine learning workshop, session 3.
- Data sets
- Machine Learning Algorithms
- Algorithms by Learning Style
- Algorithms by Similarity
- People to follow
Active learning aims to improve machine learning models using less training data by strategically selecting the most informative data points to be labeled. It is important because manually labeling data can be time-consuming and expensive. The core problem is how to actively select the most informative training points to query labels for. Different active learning methods, such as using neural networks, Bayesian models, and support vector machines, aim to query points that the current model is most uncertain about. Combining active learning with expectation maximization using a large pool of unlabeled data can improve text classification when only a small amount of labeled training data is available.
This presentation discusses about following topics:
Types of Problems Solved Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Problem categories
Classification Algorithms
Naive Bayes
Example: A person playing golf
Decision Tree
Random Forest
Logistic Regression
Support Vector Machine
Support Vector Machine
K Nearest Neighbors
Winning Kaggle 101: Introduction to StackingTed Xiao
This document provides an introduction to stacking, an ensemble machine learning method. Stacking involves training a "metalearner" to optimally combine the predictions from multiple "base learners". The stacking algorithm was developed in the 1990s and improved upon with techniques like cross-validation and the "Super Learner" which combines models in a way that is provably asymptotically optimal. H2O implements an efficient stacking method called H2O Ensemble which allows for easily finding the best combination of algorithms like GBM, DNNs, and more to improve predictions.
https://github.com/telecombcn-dl/dlmm-2017-dcu
Deep learning technologies are at the core of the current revolution in artificial intelligence for multimedia data analysis. The convergence of big annotated data and affordable GPU hardware has allowed the training of neural networks for data analysis tasks which had been addressed until now with hand-crafted features. Architectures such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks and Q-nets for reinforcement learning have shaped a brand new scenario in signal processing. This course will cover the basic principles and applications of deep learning to computer vision problems, such as image classification, object detection or text captioning.
Overfitting and underfitting are modeling errors related to how well a model fits training data. Overfitting occurs when a model is too complex and fits the training data too closely, resulting in poor performance on new data. Underfitting occurs when a model is too simple and does not fit the training data well. The bias-variance tradeoff aims to balance these issues by finding a model complexity that minimizes total error.
"Boiler Feed Pump (BFP): Working, Applications, Advantages, and Limitations E...Infopitaara
A Boiler Feed Pump (BFP) is a critical component in thermal power plants. It supplies high-pressure water (feedwater) to the boiler, ensuring continuous steam generation.
⚙️ How a Boiler Feed Pump Works
Water Collection:
Feedwater is collected from the deaerator or feedwater tank.
Pressurization:
The pump increases water pressure using multiple impellers/stages in centrifugal types.
Discharge to Boiler:
Pressurized water is then supplied to the boiler drum or economizer section, depending on design.
🌀 Types of Boiler Feed Pumps
Centrifugal Pumps (most common):
Multistage for higher pressure.
Used in large thermal power stations.
Positive Displacement Pumps (less common):
For smaller or specific applications.
Precise flow control but less efficient for large volumes.
🛠️ Key Operations and Controls
Recirculation Line: Protects the pump from overheating at low flow.
Throttle Valve: Regulates flow based on boiler demand.
Control System: Often automated via DCS/PLC for variable load conditions.
Sealing & Cooling Systems: Prevent leakage and maintain pump health.
⚠️ Common BFP Issues
Cavitation due to low NPSH (Net Positive Suction Head).
Seal or bearing failure.
Overheating from improper flow or recirculation.
Analysis of reinforced concrete deep beam is based on simplified approximate method due to the complexity of the exact analysis. The complexity is due to a number of parameters affecting its response. To evaluate some of this parameters, finite element study of the structural behavior of the reinforced self-compacting concrete deep beam was carried out using Abaqus finite element modeling tool. The model was validated against experimental data from the literature. The parametric effects of varied concrete compressive strength, vertical web reinforcement ratio and horizontal web reinforcement ratio on the beam were tested on eight (8) different specimens under four points loads. The results of the validation work showed good agreement with the experimental studies. The parametric study revealed that the concrete compressive strength most significantly influenced the specimens’ response with the average of 41.1% and 49 % increment in the diagonal cracking and ultimate load respectively due to doubling of concrete compressive strength. Although the increase in horizontal web reinforcement ratio from 0.31 % to 0.63 % lead to average of 6.24 % increment on the diagonal cracking load, it does not influence the ultimate strength and the load-deflection response of the beams. Similar variation in vertical web reinforcement ratio leads to an average of 2.4 % and 15 % increment in cracking and ultimate load respectively with no appreciable effect on the load-deflection response.
Ad
More Related Content
Similar to Unit V -Multiple Learners in artificial intelligence and machine learning (20)
Ensemble learning combines multiple machine learning models to obtain better predictive performance than could be obtained from any of the constituent models alone. It works by training base models on different subsets of the original data or using different algorithms and then combining their predictions. Two common ensemble methods are bagging and boosting. Bagging generates additional training data by sampling the original data with replacement and trains base models on these samples, while boosting iteratively reweights training examples to focus on those misclassified by previous base models. Both aim to reduce variance and prevent overfitting.
This document discusses ensemble hybrid feature selection techniques. It begins by introducing feature selection and different types of feature selection techniques, including filter, wrapper, embedded, and hybrid methods. It then discusses ensembles and why they are used, describing various ensemble methods like bagging, boosting, Bayesian averaging, and stacking. It provides examples of how ensembles are applied to tasks like image classification, text categorization, and medical image analysis. Finally, it concludes that ensembles can outperform single learning algorithms and that future research could explore more hybrid ensemble approaches.
This document discusses computational intelligence and supervised learning techniques for classification. It provides examples of applications in medical diagnosis and credit card approval. The goal of supervised learning is to learn from labeled training data to predict the class of new unlabeled examples. Decision trees and backpropagation neural networks are introduced as common supervised learning algorithms. Evaluation methods like holdout validation, cross-validation and performance metrics beyond accuracy are also summarized.
In the rapidly evolving field of machine learning (ML), the focus is often placed on developing sophisticated algorithms and models that can learn patterns, make predictions, and generate insights from data. However, one of the most critical challenges in building effective machine learning systems lies in ensuring the quality of the data used for training, testing, and validating these models. Data quality directly influences the model's performance, accuracy, and ability to generalize to unseen examples. Unfortunately, in real-world applications, data is rarely perfect, and it is often riddled with various types of errors that can lead to misleading conclusions, flawed predictions, and potentially harmful outcomes. These errors in experimental observations, also referred to as data errors or measurement errors, can significantly compromise the effectiveness of machine learning systems. The sources of these errors are diverse, ranging from technical failures, such as malfunctioning sensors or corrupted datasets, to human errors in data collection, labeling, or interpretation. Furthermore, errors may emerge during the data preprocessing stages, such as incorrect normalization, improper handling of missing data, or the introduction of noise through faulty sampling techniques. These errors can manifest in several ways, including outliers, missing values, mislabeled instances, noisy data, or data imbalances, each of which can influence how well a machine learning model performs. Understanding the nature of these errors and developing strategies to mitigate their impact is crucial for building robust and reliable machine learning models that can operate in real-world environments. Moreover, the impact of errors is not only a technical issue; it also raises significant ethical concerns, particularly when the models are used to inform high-stakes decisions, such as in healthcare, criminal justice, or finance. If errors are not properly addressed, models may inadvertently perpetuate biases, amplify inequalities, or produce inaccurate predictions that negatively affect individuals and communities. Therefore, a thorough understanding of errors in experimental observations is essential for improving the reliability, fairness, and ethical standards of machine learning applications. This introductory discussion provides the foundation for exploring the various types of errors that arise in machine learning datasets, examining their origins, their effects on model performance, and the various methods and techniques available for detecting, correcting, and mitigating these errors. By delving into the challenges posed by errors in experimental observations, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework for addressing data quality issues in machine learning and to highlight the importance of maintaining data integrity in the development and deployment of machine learning systems. This exploration of errors will also touch upon the broader implications for research
IRJET- Evaluation of Classification Algorithms with Solutions to Class Imbala...IRJET Journal
This document discusses evaluating various classification algorithms to address class imbalance problems using the bank marketing dataset in WEKA. It first introduces data mining and classification algorithms like decision trees, naive Bayes, neural networks, support vector machines, logistic regression and random forests. It then discusses the class imbalance problem that occurs when one class is underrepresented. To address this, it explores sampling techniques like random under-sampling of the majority class, random over-sampling of the minority class, and SMOTE. It uses these techniques on the bank marketing dataset to evaluate the algorithms based on metrics like precision, recall, F1-score, ROC and AUCPR for the minority class.
This document provides an introduction to ensemble learning techniques. It defines ensemble learning as combining the predictions of multiple machine learning models. The main ensemble methods described are bagging, boosting, and voting. Bagging involves training models on random subsets of data and combining results by majority vote. Boosting iteratively trains models to focus on misclassified examples from previous models. Voting simply averages the predictions of different model types. The document discusses how these techniques are implemented in scikit-learn and provides examples of decision tree bagging on the Iris dataset.
The document discusses hyperparameters and hyperparameter tuning in deep learning models. It defines hyperparameters as parameters that govern how the model parameters (weights and biases) are determined during training, in contrast to model parameters which are learned from the training data. Important hyperparameters include the learning rate, number of layers and units, and activation functions. The goal of training is for the model to perform optimally on unseen test data. Model selection, such as through cross-validation, is used to select the optimal hyperparameters. Training, validation, and test sets are also discussed, with the validation set used for model selection and the test set providing an unbiased evaluation of the fully trained model.
A brief presentation given on the basics of Ensemble Methods. Given as a 'Lightning Talk' during the 7th Cohort of General Assembly's Data Science Immersive Course
Machine learning workshop, session 3.
- Data sets
- Machine Learning Algorithms
- Algorithms by Learning Style
- Algorithms by Similarity
- People to follow
Active learning aims to improve machine learning models using less training data by strategically selecting the most informative data points to be labeled. It is important because manually labeling data can be time-consuming and expensive. The core problem is how to actively select the most informative training points to query labels for. Different active learning methods, such as using neural networks, Bayesian models, and support vector machines, aim to query points that the current model is most uncertain about. Combining active learning with expectation maximization using a large pool of unlabeled data can improve text classification when only a small amount of labeled training data is available.
This presentation discusses about following topics:
Types of Problems Solved Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Problem categories
Classification Algorithms
Naive Bayes
Example: A person playing golf
Decision Tree
Random Forest
Logistic Regression
Support Vector Machine
Support Vector Machine
K Nearest Neighbors
Winning Kaggle 101: Introduction to StackingTed Xiao
This document provides an introduction to stacking, an ensemble machine learning method. Stacking involves training a "metalearner" to optimally combine the predictions from multiple "base learners". The stacking algorithm was developed in the 1990s and improved upon with techniques like cross-validation and the "Super Learner" which combines models in a way that is provably asymptotically optimal. H2O implements an efficient stacking method called H2O Ensemble which allows for easily finding the best combination of algorithms like GBM, DNNs, and more to improve predictions.
https://github.com/telecombcn-dl/dlmm-2017-dcu
Deep learning technologies are at the core of the current revolution in artificial intelligence for multimedia data analysis. The convergence of big annotated data and affordable GPU hardware has allowed the training of neural networks for data analysis tasks which had been addressed until now with hand-crafted features. Architectures such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks and Q-nets for reinforcement learning have shaped a brand new scenario in signal processing. This course will cover the basic principles and applications of deep learning to computer vision problems, such as image classification, object detection or text captioning.
Overfitting and underfitting are modeling errors related to how well a model fits training data. Overfitting occurs when a model is too complex and fits the training data too closely, resulting in poor performance on new data. Underfitting occurs when a model is too simple and does not fit the training data well. The bias-variance tradeoff aims to balance these issues by finding a model complexity that minimizes total error.
"Boiler Feed Pump (BFP): Working, Applications, Advantages, and Limitations E...Infopitaara
A Boiler Feed Pump (BFP) is a critical component in thermal power plants. It supplies high-pressure water (feedwater) to the boiler, ensuring continuous steam generation.
⚙️ How a Boiler Feed Pump Works
Water Collection:
Feedwater is collected from the deaerator or feedwater tank.
Pressurization:
The pump increases water pressure using multiple impellers/stages in centrifugal types.
Discharge to Boiler:
Pressurized water is then supplied to the boiler drum or economizer section, depending on design.
🌀 Types of Boiler Feed Pumps
Centrifugal Pumps (most common):
Multistage for higher pressure.
Used in large thermal power stations.
Positive Displacement Pumps (less common):
For smaller or specific applications.
Precise flow control but less efficient for large volumes.
🛠️ Key Operations and Controls
Recirculation Line: Protects the pump from overheating at low flow.
Throttle Valve: Regulates flow based on boiler demand.
Control System: Often automated via DCS/PLC for variable load conditions.
Sealing & Cooling Systems: Prevent leakage and maintain pump health.
⚠️ Common BFP Issues
Cavitation due to low NPSH (Net Positive Suction Head).
Seal or bearing failure.
Overheating from improper flow or recirculation.
Analysis of reinforced concrete deep beam is based on simplified approximate method due to the complexity of the exact analysis. The complexity is due to a number of parameters affecting its response. To evaluate some of this parameters, finite element study of the structural behavior of the reinforced self-compacting concrete deep beam was carried out using Abaqus finite element modeling tool. The model was validated against experimental data from the literature. The parametric effects of varied concrete compressive strength, vertical web reinforcement ratio and horizontal web reinforcement ratio on the beam were tested on eight (8) different specimens under four points loads. The results of the validation work showed good agreement with the experimental studies. The parametric study revealed that the concrete compressive strength most significantly influenced the specimens’ response with the average of 41.1% and 49 % increment in the diagonal cracking and ultimate load respectively due to doubling of concrete compressive strength. Although the increase in horizontal web reinforcement ratio from 0.31 % to 0.63 % lead to average of 6.24 % increment on the diagonal cracking load, it does not influence the ultimate strength and the load-deflection response of the beams. Similar variation in vertical web reinforcement ratio leads to an average of 2.4 % and 15 % increment in cracking and ultimate load respectively with no appreciable effect on the load-deflection response.
Fluid mechanics is the branch of physics concerned with the mechanics of fluids (liquids, gases, and plasmas) and the forces on them. Originally applied to water (hydromechanics), it found applications in a wide range of disciplines, including mechanical, aerospace, civil, chemical, and biomedical engineering, as well as geophysics, oceanography, meteorology, astrophysics, and biology.
It can be divided into fluid statics, the study of various fluids at rest, and fluid dynamics.
Fluid statics, also known as hydrostatics, is the study of fluids at rest, specifically when there's no relative motion between fluid particles. It focuses on the conditions under which fluids are in stable equilibrium and doesn't involve fluid motion.
Fluid kinematics is the branch of fluid mechanics that focuses on describing and analyzing the motion of fluids, such as liquids and gases, without considering the forces that cause the motion. It deals with the geometrical and temporal aspects of fluid flow, including velocity and acceleration. Fluid dynamics, on the other hand, considers the forces acting on the fluid.
Fluid dynamics is the study of the effect of forces on fluid motion. It is a branch of continuum mechanics, a subject which models matter without using the information that it is made out of atoms; that is, it models matter from a macroscopic viewpoint rather than from microscopic.
Fluid mechanics, especially fluid dynamics, is an active field of research, typically mathematically complex. Many problems are partly or wholly unsolved and are best addressed by numerical methods, typically using computers. A modern discipline, called computational fluid dynamics (CFD), is devoted to this approach. Particle image velocimetry, an experimental method for visualizing and analyzing fluid flow, also takes advantage of the highly visual nature of fluid flow.
Fundamentally, every fluid mechanical system is assumed to obey the basic laws :
Conservation of mass
Conservation of energy
Conservation of momentum
The continuum assumption
For example, the assumption that mass is conserved means that for any fixed control volume (for example, a spherical volume)—enclosed by a control surface—the rate of change of the mass contained in that volume is equal to the rate at which mass is passing through the surface from outside to inside, minus the rate at which mass is passing from inside to outside. This can be expressed as an equation in integral form over the control volume.
The continuum assumption is an idealization of continuum mechanics under which fluids can be treated as continuous, even though, on a microscopic scale, they are composed of molecules. Under the continuum assumption, macroscopic (observed/measurable) properties such as density, pressure, temperature, and bulk velocity are taken to be well-defined at "infinitesimal" volume elements—small in comparison to the characteristic length scale of the system, but large in comparison to molecular length scale
Passenger car unit (PCU) of a vehicle type depends on vehicular characteristics, stream characteristics, roadway characteristics, environmental factors, climate conditions and control conditions. Keeping in view various factors affecting PCU, a model was developed taking a volume to capacity ratio and percentage share of particular vehicle type as independent parameters. A microscopic traffic simulation model VISSIM has been used in present study for generating traffic flow data which some time very difficult to obtain from field survey. A comparison study was carried out with the purpose of verifying when the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models are appropriate for prediction of PCUs of different vehicle types. From the results observed that ANFIS model estimates were closer to the corresponding simulated PCU values compared to MLR and ANN models. It is concluded that the ANFIS model showed greater potential in predicting PCUs from v/c ratio and proportional share for all type of vehicles whereas MLR and ANN models did not perform well.
We introduce the Gaussian process (GP) modeling module developed within the UQLab software framework. The novel design of the GP-module aims at providing seamless integration of GP modeling into any uncertainty quantification workflow, as well as a standalone surrogate modeling tool. We first briefly present the key mathematical tools on the basis of GP modeling (a.k.a. Kriging), as well as the associated theoretical and computational framework. We then provide an extensive overview of the available features of the software and demonstrate its flexibility and user-friendliness. Finally, we showcase the usage and the performance of the software on several applications borrowed from different fields of engineering. These include a basic surrogate of a well-known analytical benchmark function; a hierarchical Kriging example applied to wind turbine aero-servo-elastic simulations and a more complex geotechnical example that requires a non-stationary, user-defined correlation function. The GP-module, like the rest of the scientific code that is shipped with UQLab, is open source (BSD license).
Concept of Problem Solving, Introduction to Algorithms, Characteristics of Algorithms, Introduction to Data Structure, Data Structure Classification (Linear and Non-linear, Static and Dynamic, Persistent and Ephemeral data structures), Time complexity and Space complexity, Asymptotic Notation - The Big-O, Omega and Theta notation, Algorithmic upper bounds, lower bounds, Best, Worst and Average case analysis of an Algorithm, Abstract Data Types (ADT)
Value Stream Mapping Worskshops for Intelligent Continuous SecurityMarc Hornbeek
This presentation provides detailed guidance and tools for conducting Current State and Future State Value Stream Mapping workshops for Intelligent Continuous Security.
The role of the lexical analyzer
Specification of tokens
Finite state machines
From a regular expressions to an NFA
Convert NFA to DFA
Transforming grammars and regular expressions
Transforming automata to grammars
Language for specifying lexical analyzers
This paper proposes a shoulder inverse kinematics (IK) technique. Shoulder complex is comprised of the sternum, clavicle, ribs, scapula, humerus, and four joints.
How to use nRF24L01 module with ArduinoCircuitDigest
Learn how to wirelessly transmit sensor data using nRF24L01 and Arduino Uno. A simple project demonstrating real-time communication with DHT11 and OLED display.
2. Multiple Learners
• There is no algorithm that is always the most accurate
• Generate a group of base-learners which when combined has higher
accuracy
• Different learners use different
• Algorithms
• Hyperparameters
• Representations /Modalities/Views
• Training sets
10. Error-Correcting Output Codes
1. Classification Task:
o It is divided into multiple subtasks. Instead of solving one large classification problem, it is broken down
into simpler binary classification problems.
2. Simpler Classification Problems:
o Each binary classifier (a model that outputs either -1 or +1) focuses on a specific aspect of the task, helping
to simplify the overall problem.
3. Binary Classifiers:
o Each classifier outputs either -1 or +1. These outputs correspond to the class predictions for specific parts
of the task.
4. Code Matrix (W):
o A matrix W is introduced with K rows and L columns.
o The rows represent the different classes, and the columns correspond to different classifiers (base-
learners).
o The values within the matrix are binary (-1 or +1), which act as the "codes" for each class. Each class is
represented as a unique combination of -1s and +1s across the classifiers.
17. Error-Correcting Output Codes
Types of ECOC
• There are several variations of ECOC, each with its own characteristics and applications.
• One-vs-All (OvA): In the One-vs-All approach, each class is compared against all other classes.
This results in a code matrix where each column has one class labeled as 1 and all others as -1.
This method is simple but may not be optimal for all problems.
• One-vs-One (OvO): In the One-vs-One approach, each pair of classes is compared, resulting in a
code matrix where each column represents a binary classifier for a pair of classes. This method can
be more accurate but requires training more classifiers.
• Dense and Sparse Codes: Dense codes use a larger number of binary classifiers, resulting in more
robust error correction but higher computational cost. Sparse codes use fewer classifiers, reducing
computational cost but potentially sacrificing some robustness.
18. Error-Correcting Output Codes
Advantages of Error Correcting Output Codes(ECOC)
• Robustness to Errors:
• Improved Generalization
• Flexibility
Applications of Error Correcting Output Codes(ECOC)
1. Image Classification
2. Text Classification
3. Bioinformatics
4. Speech Recognition
20. Bagging
What Is Bagging?
Bagging, an abbreviation for Bootstrap Aggregating, is a machine learning
ensemble strategy for enhancing the reliability and precision of predictive models. It
entails generating numerous subsets of the training data by employing random
sampling with replacement. These subsets train multiple base learners, such as
decision trees, neural networks, or other models.
During prediction, the outputs of these base learners are aggregated, often by
averaging (for regression tasks) or voting (for classification tasks), to produce the
final prediction. Bagging helps to reduce overfitting by introducing diversity among
the base learners and improves the overall performance by reducing variance and
increasing robustness
21. Bagging
•Use bootstrapping to generate L training sets
and train one base-learner with each (Breiman,
1996)
•Use voting (Average or median with regression)
•Unstable algorithms profit from bagging
22. Steps of Bagging
Dataset Preparation: Prepare your dataset, ensuring it's properly cleaned
and preprocessed. Split it into a training set and a test set.
Bootstrap Sampling: Randomly sample from the training dataset with
replacement to create multiple bootstrap samples. Each bootstrap sample
should typically have the same size as the original dataset, but some data
points may be repeated while others may be omitted.
Model Training: Train a base model (e.g., decision tree, neural network, etc.)
on each bootstrap sample. Each model should be trained independently of
the others.
Prediction Generation: Use each trained model to predict the test dataset.
Combining Predictions: Combine the predictions from all the models. You
can use majority voting to determine the final predicted class for classification
tasks. For regression tasks, you can average the predictions.
23. Bagging method
Bootstrap Aggregating is an ensemble learning technique that integrates many models to
produce a more accurate and robust prediction model. The following stages are included in
the bagging algorithm:
Bootstrap Sampling– It’s the process of randomly sampling a dataset with replacement to
generate various subsets known as bootstrap samples. The size of each subset is the same
as the original dataset.
Base Model Training– A base model, such as a decision tree or a neural network, is trained
individually on each bootstrap sample. Because the subsets are not similar, each base
model generates a separate prediction model.
Aggregation– The result of each base model is then aggregated via aggregation, which is
commonly accomplished by taking the average for regression problems or the mode for
classification issues. This aggregation process contributes to the reduction of variance and
the improvement of the generalization performance of the final prediction model.
Prediction– The completed model is used to forecast fresh data
24. Steps of Bagging
Evaluation: Evaluate the bagging ensemble's performance on the test dataset
using appropriate metrics (e.g., accuracy, F1 score, mean squared error, etc.).
Hyperparameter Tuning: If necessary, tune the hyperparameters of the base
model(s) or the bagging ensemble itself using techniques like cross-validation.
Deployment: Once you're satisfied with the performance of the bagging
ensemble, deploy it to make predictions on new, unseen data.
30. How Does Boosting Algorithms
Work?
• Step 1: The base learner takes all the distributions and assign equal weight or
attention to each observation.
• Step 2: If there is any prediction error caused by first base learning algorithm,
then we pay higher attention to observations having prediction error. Then, we
apply the next base learning algorithm.
• Step 3: Iterate Step 2 till the limit of base learning algorithm is reached or higher
accuracy is achieved.
Finally, it combines the outputs from weak learner and creates a strong
learner which eventually improves the prediction power of the model.
Boosting pays higher focus on examples which are mis-classified or have
higher errors by preceding weak rules.
32. AdaBoost
• Box 1: You can see that we have assigned equal weights to each data point and
applied a decision stump to classify them as + (plus) or – (minus). The decision
stump (D1) has generated vertical line at left side to classify the data points. We
see that, this vertical line has incorrectly predicted three + (plus) as – (minus). In
such case, we’ll assign higher weights to these three + (plus) and apply another
decision stump.
33. AdaBoost
• Box 2: Here, you can see that the size of three incorrectly predicted + (plus) is
bigger as compared to rest of the data points. In this case, the second decision
stump (D2) will try to predict them correctly. Now, a vertical line (D2) at right side
of this box has classified three mis-classified + (plus) correctly. But again, it has
caused mis-classification errors. This time with three -(minus). Again, we will
assign higher weight to three – (minus) and apply another decision stump.
34. AdaBoost
• Box 3: Here, three – (minus) are given higher weights. A decision stump (D3) is
applied to predict these mis-classified observation correctly. This time a
horizontal line is generated to classify + (plus) and – (minus) based on higher
weight of mis-classified observation.
35. AdaBoost
• Box 3: Here, three – (minus) are given higher weights. A decision stump (D3) is
applied to predict these mis-classified observation correctly. This time a
horizontal line is generated to classify + (plus) and – (minus) based on higher
weight of mis-classified observation.
39. Stacking
• Stacked generalization is an ensemble method where a new model learns
how to best combine the predictions from multiple existing models
• In stacking, an algorithm takes the outputs of sub-models as input and
attempts to learn how to best combine the input predictions to make a
better output prediction.
• Can be Non Linear
50. Cascading
Use dj only if
preceding ones are
not confident
Cascade learners in
order of complexity
51. Key Components of Cascading
1.Stages:
1. Each stage typically consists of a classifier or model that operates on the
data.
2. Early stages use simpler models that quickly identify and discard obvious
negative samples.
3. Later stages employ more complex models that handle the remaining,
more challenging cases.
2.Decision Thresholds:
1. Each classifier in the cascade has a threshold that determines whether a
sample is classified positively or negatively.
2. The thresholds can be adjusted to balance sensitivity (true positive rate)
and specificity (true negative rate).
3.Error Focus:
1. Each subsequent model in the cascade is trained to focus on the errors
made by the previous classifiers, enhancing the overall model's ability to
correct mistakes.
52. How Cascading Works
1.Initial Classifier: The first model is trained on the entire dataset. It makes
predictions and classifies samples.
2.Filtering:
1. Samples that are classified as negatives are discarded.
2. Positive samples are passed to the next stage for further analysis.
3.Subsequent Classifiers:
1. Each subsequent classifier builds on the output of the previous one.
2. This continues until all stages have been applied or until a final decision is
made.
53. Cascading
• For example, suppose we want to build a machine learning model which would
detect if a credit card transaction is fraudulent or not.