SlideShare a Scribd company logo
White paper mbre_en
VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22
2
Model-based Requirement Engineering
- Concept Description
VISIONEER GmbH has developed a revolutionary concept for model-
based requirement engineering (MBRE) and a system-kit for embedded
systems.
Standardized specifications can be created with conventional RE tools
(Doors, Polarion, Word...) and extended with simple class notations. The
Visioneer MBRE tool identifies these notations and provides a
specification-system-kit (classes) for embedded systems. Thus, the
specification artifacts themselves become a model that can be handled
with object-oriented methods.
MBRE Features:
• "Easy-to-learn" object-oriented requirement engineering
• Automatisms for smart and standardized specifications
• Controlled reuse of imported MBSE diagrams, libraries and the
elements of a system-kit for embedded systems specifications
• Controlled handling of requirements and their solutions /
subsolutions
• Integrated solutions implementation verification in the
specification and in derived work items
• Integrated method for controlled description and generation of
behavioral requirements
• Automatic generation of SW code from the specification
Simple notation for object-oriented requirement engineering: By using
few textual notations, classes can be generated, derived and converted
into specification-artifacts (by instantiation).
Fig. 1: Sample class handling in Doors specifications
As in the example shown, classes are derived with simple notations and
specification-artifacts are generated by instantiation.
"The benefit is, that it can clearly be defined with
oriented methods, which artifact elements
shall be inherited, which are optional or mandatory
and which may be changed, extended or deleted "
VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22
3
In the smart specifications, the automatisms (methods) contained in
classes are used, enables that:
- inherited specification artifacts (text, diagram- or table-elements) are
automatically generated
- functions its interface requirements and solution assignments are
automatically generated in the function description
- the specification contents are automatically verified for its
completeness, unambiguity and consistency
- System MBSE models are imported and merged with library solution
classes
The controlled reuse of imported MBSE diagrams, libraries and the
elements of the system-kit for embedded systems specifications enables
a uniquely consistent and standardized structure of specifications
according to the basic principle of the "single-source-of-truth".
This is realized by a model exchange both within the specification and
across model- and work item -boundaries and is thus a significant
improvement on today's situation, in which the various work items are
only linked.
The controlled handling of requirements and their solutions or
subsolutions through classes enables:
- a clear assignment (automatic linking) of these with each other and
the assigned functional entities from which a solution is expected
- the simple inheritance of product-specific solutions (experts know-
how) and “self-learning” libraries
- an automatic verification if all mandatory solution components for
all requirements are fully and unambiguously defined in the created
specification-artifacts and if they are really implemented in its
derived work items (SW code, test protocol, ... )
The proof of implementation can, for example, be carried out before a
product release, whereby the following protocol is automatically
generated:
Fig.2: Automatically generated Requirement Implementation Protocol
VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22
4
However, the most remarkable feature of MBRE is the integrated
method for a standardized description of behavioral requirements: For
the first time, it has been possible to integrate a method into a RE tool,
which provides proof that all behavioral requirements are completely
and clearly defined.
This is an enormous and very expensive problem for embedded systems
applications, as non-existent or misinterpreted requirements
undermine the entire quality assurance process and are therefore often
discovered by the customer finally.
It is so difficult to define them completely and unambiguously for real-
time systems, because in any functional description the states of all
other parallel behavioral requirements must always be taken into
account, which are assigned to the el. control unit simultaneously by
different actors.
Fig.3: Parallel occurrence of system behavior requirements
Practically, there can be many independent actors with multiple states
each, and therefore this often results in millions of possible
combinations, for which a clear behavior must be defined in any function
description separately.
Additionally, any individual requirements should be testable, this means
it shall be described textually only with the IO signals. The current way
to solve these problems is to simulate all pot. IO combinations. However,
this requires a very high effort, as the result of each individual
combination must be evaluated manually and is therefore only rarely
performed.
Also, even with this complex procedure, due to the large number of
simultaneous events it cannot be ensured, that, the expected (dominant)
behavior is really defined in any pot. situation. There is simply no
methodology to verify this, as they are only described with IO signals.
In MBRE, this is possible for the first time using the integrated method
for the description of behavioral requirements:
"The idea behind this is that first the dominant behavior of all
parallel system behavior requirements
shall be clearly described in behavior logic tables
and shall then be automatically applied to any individual functional
requirement, which is described, for example, with MBSE diagrams"
The
VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22
5
Out of the defined behavior logic tables in conjunction with the
functional descriptions, the automatic generation of guaranteed
complete, unambiguously and testable behavior requirements and their
derived requirements for the real-time scheduler is performed:
Fig.4: Automatically generated behavior requirements
Conclusion
Through the many integrated automatisms and the performed
verifications, Model Based Requirement Engineering enables both, a
significant saving of engineering efforts and an enormous increase
in the quality of the product to be developed.
"MBRE can be seen as the missing link between
MBSE and MBSA (like AutoSar)
in their approach to generate SW
for Embedded Systems out of MBSE models "
More questions?
Contact:
Gerhard Schilling,
Phone +49 179-324 5588
schilling@visioneer.info
www.visioneer.info

More Related Content

PDF
Rediscovering Spring with Spring Boot(1)
Gunith Devasurendra
 
PPTX
Spring boot
sdeeg
 
PPTX
Spring boot 3g
vasya10
 
PDF
Spring Boot
HongSeong Jeon
 
PDF
SpringBoot
Jaran Flaath
 
ODP
Springboot and camel
Deepak Kumar
 
PPTX
Spring boot
Gyanendra Yadav
 
PDF
Getting Reactive with Spring Framework 5.0’s GA release
VMware Tanzu
 
Rediscovering Spring with Spring Boot(1)
Gunith Devasurendra
 
Spring boot
sdeeg
 
Spring boot 3g
vasya10
 
Spring Boot
HongSeong Jeon
 
SpringBoot
Jaran Flaath
 
Springboot and camel
Deepak Kumar
 
Spring boot
Gyanendra Yadav
 
Getting Reactive with Spring Framework 5.0’s GA release
VMware Tanzu
 

What's hot (20)

PDF
Connecting Connect with Spring Boot
Vincent Kok
 
PDF
Spring Boot
Jaran Flaath
 
PPTX
Spring boot - an introduction
Jonathan Holloway
 
PDF
Building a Spring Boot Application - Ask the Audience! (from JavaLand 2017)
🎤 Hanno Embregts 🎸
 
PDF
Spring Boot Intro
Alberto Flores
 
PDF
Introduction to Spring Boot!
Jakub Kubrynski
 
PDF
Spring Boot & Actuators
VMware Tanzu
 
PPTX
Mongo db
Gyanendra Yadav
 
PPTX
Spring boot
Pradeep Shanmugam
 
PPTX
Ready! Steady! SpringBoot!
GlobalLogic Ukraine
 
PDF
Spring Boot
koppenolski
 
PPTX
Spring MVC framework
Mohit Gupta
 
PPT
Springboot introduction
Sagar Verma
 
PPTX
What is Spring Boot and Why Spring Boot ?
narendrachinnu
 
PDF
Spring boot jpa
Hamid Ghorbani
 
PDF
Advanced Spring Boot with Consul
VMware Tanzu
 
PPTX
Introduction to Spring Boot
Purbarun Chakrabarti
 
PPTX
Spring boot
Shatrughna Singh
 
PDF
Migrating 25K lines of Ant scripting to Gradle
🎤 Hanno Embregts 🎸
 
PDF
Workshop Guide: RESTful Java Web Application with Spring Boot
Fabricio Epaminondas
 
Connecting Connect with Spring Boot
Vincent Kok
 
Spring Boot
Jaran Flaath
 
Spring boot - an introduction
Jonathan Holloway
 
Building a Spring Boot Application - Ask the Audience! (from JavaLand 2017)
🎤 Hanno Embregts 🎸
 
Spring Boot Intro
Alberto Flores
 
Introduction to Spring Boot!
Jakub Kubrynski
 
Spring Boot & Actuators
VMware Tanzu
 
Mongo db
Gyanendra Yadav
 
Spring boot
Pradeep Shanmugam
 
Ready! Steady! SpringBoot!
GlobalLogic Ukraine
 
Spring Boot
koppenolski
 
Spring MVC framework
Mohit Gupta
 
Springboot introduction
Sagar Verma
 
What is Spring Boot and Why Spring Boot ?
narendrachinnu
 
Spring boot jpa
Hamid Ghorbani
 
Advanced Spring Boot with Consul
VMware Tanzu
 
Introduction to Spring Boot
Purbarun Chakrabarti
 
Spring boot
Shatrughna Singh
 
Migrating 25K lines of Ant scripting to Gradle
🎤 Hanno Embregts 🎸
 
Workshop Guide: RESTful Java Web Application with Spring Boot
Fabricio Epaminondas
 
Ad

Similar to White paper mbre_en (20)

DOCX
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Model based analysis of wireless sys...
IEEEGLOBALSOFTTECHNOLOGIES
 
DOCX
Running head MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING IMPLEMENTATION 1.docx
cowinhelen
 
PDF
Fostering MBSE in Engineering Culture
Obeo
 
PPTX
Unit2 2
sush-sushma
 
PPTX
Topic 19. User Requirements.pptx
ssuserec6f52
 
PDF
Performancepredictionforsoftwarearchitectures 100810045752-phpapp02
NNfamily
 
PDF
Performance prediction for software architectures
Mr. Chanuwan
 
PDF
safety assurence in process control
Nathiya Vaithi
 
PDF
An Algorithm Based Simulation Modeling For Control of Production Systems
IJMER
 
DOCX
Dnyaneshwar_Anantwar_Resume
aryan9011079624
 
PDF
SYS_ANY_FINAL_G00297433_Fallon
Eric Fallon
 
PDF
Tactics
ayjagadish
 
DOC
Document defect tracking for improving product quality and productivity
ch_tabitha7
 
PDF
Application Of UML In Real-Time Embedded Systems
ijseajournal
 
PDF
Transformation of simulink models to iec 61499 function blocks for verificati...
Tiago Oliveira
 
PPT
Unit 2
KRAMANJANEYULU1
 
PPTX
Modeling and Testing Dovetail in MagicDraw
Gregory Solovey
 
PDF
Run-time Monitoring-based Evaluation and Communication Integrity Validation o...
Ana Nicolaescu
 
PDF
Self learning real time expert system
ijscai
 
PDF
IRJET- Automatic Database Schema Generator
IRJET Journal
 
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Model based analysis of wireless sys...
IEEEGLOBALSOFTTECHNOLOGIES
 
Running head MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING IMPLEMENTATION 1.docx
cowinhelen
 
Fostering MBSE in Engineering Culture
Obeo
 
Unit2 2
sush-sushma
 
Topic 19. User Requirements.pptx
ssuserec6f52
 
Performancepredictionforsoftwarearchitectures 100810045752-phpapp02
NNfamily
 
Performance prediction for software architectures
Mr. Chanuwan
 
safety assurence in process control
Nathiya Vaithi
 
An Algorithm Based Simulation Modeling For Control of Production Systems
IJMER
 
Dnyaneshwar_Anantwar_Resume
aryan9011079624
 
SYS_ANY_FINAL_G00297433_Fallon
Eric Fallon
 
Tactics
ayjagadish
 
Document defect tracking for improving product quality and productivity
ch_tabitha7
 
Application Of UML In Real-Time Embedded Systems
ijseajournal
 
Transformation of simulink models to iec 61499 function blocks for verificati...
Tiago Oliveira
 
Modeling and Testing Dovetail in MagicDraw
Gregory Solovey
 
Run-time Monitoring-based Evaluation and Communication Integrity Validation o...
Ana Nicolaescu
 
Self learning real time expert system
ijscai
 
IRJET- Automatic Database Schema Generator
IRJET Journal
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Introduction to Ship Engine Room Systems.pdf
Mahmoud Moghtaderi
 
PDF
Software Testing Tools - names and explanation
shruti533256
 
PDF
67243-Cooling and Heating & Calculation.pdf
DHAKA POLYTECHNIC
 
PDF
flutter Launcher Icons, Splash Screens & Fonts
Ahmed Mohamed
 
PDF
Traditional Exams vs Continuous Assessment in Boarding Schools.pdf
The Asian School
 
PPT
Ppt for engineering students application on field effect
lakshmi.ec
 
PPTX
Information Retrieval and Extraction - Module 7
premSankar19
 
PPTX
AgentX UiPath Community Webinar series - Delhi
RohitRadhakrishnan8
 
PPTX
EE3303-EM-I 25.7.25 electrical machines.pptx
Nagen87
 
PPTX
22PCOAM21 Data Quality Session 3 Data Quality.pptx
Guru Nanak Technical Institutions
 
PPT
1. SYSTEMS, ROLES, AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES.ppt
zilow058
 
PPTX
MT Chapter 1.pptx- Magnetic particle testing
ABCAnyBodyCanRelax
 
PDF
Unit I Part II.pdf : Security Fundamentals
Dr. Madhuri Jawale
 
PDF
Cryptography and Information :Security Fundamentals
Dr. Madhuri Jawale
 
PPTX
Chapter_Seven_Construction_Reliability_Elective_III_Msc CM
SubashKumarBhattarai
 
PDF
FLEX-LNG-Company-Presentation-Nov-2017.pdf
jbloggzs
 
PPT
Lecture in network security and mobile computing
AbdullahOmar704132
 
PPTX
ternal cell structure: leadership, steering
hodeeesite4
 
DOCX
SAR - EEEfdfdsdasdsdasdasdasdasdasdasdasda.docx
Kanimozhi676285
 
PDF
67243-Cooling and Heating & Calculation.pdf
DHAKA POLYTECHNIC
 
Introduction to Ship Engine Room Systems.pdf
Mahmoud Moghtaderi
 
Software Testing Tools - names and explanation
shruti533256
 
67243-Cooling and Heating & Calculation.pdf
DHAKA POLYTECHNIC
 
flutter Launcher Icons, Splash Screens & Fonts
Ahmed Mohamed
 
Traditional Exams vs Continuous Assessment in Boarding Schools.pdf
The Asian School
 
Ppt for engineering students application on field effect
lakshmi.ec
 
Information Retrieval and Extraction - Module 7
premSankar19
 
AgentX UiPath Community Webinar series - Delhi
RohitRadhakrishnan8
 
EE3303-EM-I 25.7.25 electrical machines.pptx
Nagen87
 
22PCOAM21 Data Quality Session 3 Data Quality.pptx
Guru Nanak Technical Institutions
 
1. SYSTEMS, ROLES, AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES.ppt
zilow058
 
MT Chapter 1.pptx- Magnetic particle testing
ABCAnyBodyCanRelax
 
Unit I Part II.pdf : Security Fundamentals
Dr. Madhuri Jawale
 
Cryptography and Information :Security Fundamentals
Dr. Madhuri Jawale
 
Chapter_Seven_Construction_Reliability_Elective_III_Msc CM
SubashKumarBhattarai
 
FLEX-LNG-Company-Presentation-Nov-2017.pdf
jbloggzs
 
Lecture in network security and mobile computing
AbdullahOmar704132
 
ternal cell structure: leadership, steering
hodeeesite4
 
SAR - EEEfdfdsdasdsdasdasdasdasdasdasdasda.docx
Kanimozhi676285
 
67243-Cooling and Heating & Calculation.pdf
DHAKA POLYTECHNIC
 

White paper mbre_en

  • 2. VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22 2 Model-based Requirement Engineering - Concept Description VISIONEER GmbH has developed a revolutionary concept for model- based requirement engineering (MBRE) and a system-kit for embedded systems. Standardized specifications can be created with conventional RE tools (Doors, Polarion, Word...) and extended with simple class notations. The Visioneer MBRE tool identifies these notations and provides a specification-system-kit (classes) for embedded systems. Thus, the specification artifacts themselves become a model that can be handled with object-oriented methods. MBRE Features: • "Easy-to-learn" object-oriented requirement engineering • Automatisms for smart and standardized specifications • Controlled reuse of imported MBSE diagrams, libraries and the elements of a system-kit for embedded systems specifications • Controlled handling of requirements and their solutions / subsolutions • Integrated solutions implementation verification in the specification and in derived work items • Integrated method for controlled description and generation of behavioral requirements • Automatic generation of SW code from the specification Simple notation for object-oriented requirement engineering: By using few textual notations, classes can be generated, derived and converted into specification-artifacts (by instantiation). Fig. 1: Sample class handling in Doors specifications As in the example shown, classes are derived with simple notations and specification-artifacts are generated by instantiation. "The benefit is, that it can clearly be defined with oriented methods, which artifact elements shall be inherited, which are optional or mandatory and which may be changed, extended or deleted "
  • 3. VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22 3 In the smart specifications, the automatisms (methods) contained in classes are used, enables that: - inherited specification artifacts (text, diagram- or table-elements) are automatically generated - functions its interface requirements and solution assignments are automatically generated in the function description - the specification contents are automatically verified for its completeness, unambiguity and consistency - System MBSE models are imported and merged with library solution classes The controlled reuse of imported MBSE diagrams, libraries and the elements of the system-kit for embedded systems specifications enables a uniquely consistent and standardized structure of specifications according to the basic principle of the "single-source-of-truth". This is realized by a model exchange both within the specification and across model- and work item -boundaries and is thus a significant improvement on today's situation, in which the various work items are only linked. The controlled handling of requirements and their solutions or subsolutions through classes enables: - a clear assignment (automatic linking) of these with each other and the assigned functional entities from which a solution is expected - the simple inheritance of product-specific solutions (experts know- how) and “self-learning” libraries - an automatic verification if all mandatory solution components for all requirements are fully and unambiguously defined in the created specification-artifacts and if they are really implemented in its derived work items (SW code, test protocol, ... ) The proof of implementation can, for example, be carried out before a product release, whereby the following protocol is automatically generated: Fig.2: Automatically generated Requirement Implementation Protocol
  • 4. VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22 4 However, the most remarkable feature of MBRE is the integrated method for a standardized description of behavioral requirements: For the first time, it has been possible to integrate a method into a RE tool, which provides proof that all behavioral requirements are completely and clearly defined. This is an enormous and very expensive problem for embedded systems applications, as non-existent or misinterpreted requirements undermine the entire quality assurance process and are therefore often discovered by the customer finally. It is so difficult to define them completely and unambiguously for real- time systems, because in any functional description the states of all other parallel behavioral requirements must always be taken into account, which are assigned to the el. control unit simultaneously by different actors. Fig.3: Parallel occurrence of system behavior requirements Practically, there can be many independent actors with multiple states each, and therefore this often results in millions of possible combinations, for which a clear behavior must be defined in any function description separately. Additionally, any individual requirements should be testable, this means it shall be described textually only with the IO signals. The current way to solve these problems is to simulate all pot. IO combinations. However, this requires a very high effort, as the result of each individual combination must be evaluated manually and is therefore only rarely performed. Also, even with this complex procedure, due to the large number of simultaneous events it cannot be ensured, that, the expected (dominant) behavior is really defined in any pot. situation. There is simply no methodology to verify this, as they are only described with IO signals. In MBRE, this is possible for the first time using the integrated method for the description of behavioral requirements: "The idea behind this is that first the dominant behavior of all parallel system behavior requirements shall be clearly described in behavior logic tables and shall then be automatically applied to any individual functional requirement, which is described, for example, with MBSE diagrams" The
  • 5. VISIONEER White Paper MBRE, Feb 22 5 Out of the defined behavior logic tables in conjunction with the functional descriptions, the automatic generation of guaranteed complete, unambiguously and testable behavior requirements and their derived requirements for the real-time scheduler is performed: Fig.4: Automatically generated behavior requirements Conclusion Through the many integrated automatisms and the performed verifications, Model Based Requirement Engineering enables both, a significant saving of engineering efforts and an enormous increase in the quality of the product to be developed. "MBRE can be seen as the missing link between MBSE and MBSA (like AutoSar) in their approach to generate SW for Embedded Systems out of MBSE models " More questions? Contact: Gerhard Schilling, Phone +49 179-324 5588 [email protected] www.visioneer.info