Banking for the Future: Savings, Security and Seeds

Banking for the future:
Savings, security and seeds
A short study of community seed banks in
Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Honduras,
India, Nepal, Thailand, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

2
Published by The Development Fund/ Utviklingsfondet
All rights reserved The Development Fund/ Utviklingsfondet, Norway
First published 2011
Readers are encouraged to make use of, reproduce, disseminate and translate material from this
publication with acknowledgement of this publication.
For more information please contact
The Development Fund/ Utviklingsfondet
Grensen 9B
N- 0159 Oslo
Norway
+47 23 10 96 00
www.utviklingsfondet.no
post@utviklingsfondet.no
Contributors at the Development Fund: Andrew P. Kroglund, Annette Wilhelmsen, Bell Batta
Torheim, Kristin Ulsrud, Pitambar Shresta, Rosalba Ortiz, Sigurd Jorde and Teshome Hunduma
Mulesa.
Acknowledgement: First of all, thanks to all working with community seed banks on a daily basis
and for sharing their experiences with us! Thanks to Nicha Rakpanichmanee (Thailand), Girma
G. Medhin (Ethiopia), Bethel Nakaponda (Zambia), Eduardo Aquilar-Espinoza (Costa Rica),
Deepak Kumar Rijal (Nepal), C. K. Saha (Bangladesh), K.Siva Prasad (India) and Vivian Victoria
Christiaens (Zimbabwe) for documenting the experiences of community seed banks in different
countries and thereby providing essential material for this report. A warm thanks to Regassa
Feysissa and Melaku Worede for proving valuable background information on community seeds
banks. Regine Andersen and Tone Winge have kindly written a chapter on linking community seed
banks to Farmers’ Rights for this report. Despite short notice, Andrew Mushita, Charles Nkhoma,
Fredrik Fredriksen, Neth Dano, Trygve Berg and Vanaja Ramprasad have provided valuable
feedback on parts of the report.
The Development Fund is a Norwegian independent non-governmental organisation (NGO).
Our global programme on agricultural biodiversity supports local partners in the Global South in
community based management of crop genetic diversity. Work at the field level is complemented
by advocacy and information work at the national and international levels. The programme is
supported by NORAD.
Layout: Åsmund Gravem
Trykk: Grøset
Cover photo: Seeds of pulses at the market, Burma Photo: Jean-Leo Dugast
Back cover photo: Woman dries melon seeds in Kigbara-Dere, Nigeria. Photo: George Osodi

3
Contents
Chapter I: Why community seed banks? 4
Seed diversity and conservation strategies 4
Chapter II: Linking community seed banks and Farmers’ Rights 5
Components of Farmers’ Rights 5
How community seed banks may promote Farmers’ Rights 6
Chapter III: Making a case of local experiences 7
Sustainable agriculture secures Bangladesh’s seed future 7
Farmers as seed producers in Costa Rica 7
Bringing traditional varieties back to farmers in Ethiopia 9
Saving seeds in Honduras: relief when the weather hits 9
Meeting poor farmers’ needs in India 10
Increasing farmers’ income in Nepal 10
Involving high school students in Thailand 11
Distributing modern varieties in Zambia 11
Seed fairs promote seed diversity in Zimbabwe 13
Chapter IV: Arguing the case for community seed banks 13
Why are community seed banks established? 13
Who are involved? 15
How do community seed banks work? 15
Documented results 15
Challenges 16
Chapter V: Up-scaling community seed banks to implement Farmers’ Rights
and towards a sustainable future for agriculture 18

4
Chapter I: Why community seed
banks?
The global seed market has grown considerably the last decades
into a multibillion dollar industry, largely due to more farmers
purchasing seeds.1 Despite the growth in the commercial seed
sector, the majority of the farmers in the developing world
still depend on the harvest season to collect seeds. They are
therefore very vulnerable to the risk of crop failure, and even
more so as weather patterns change drastically every year.
Availability and reliability of seeds at the right time, as well as
easy access, is crucial for poor farmers.
Seeds are related to food, culture, religion and local traditions.
Taking care of quality seeds has always been a core task
for farmers and farmers are constantly on the outlook for
seeds that will give them the best harvest. Many farmers
particularly in developing countries still maintain seed
diversity on their farms, where seeds have been selected and
conserved through generations.
Why is conserving seeds so important? Seeds are carriers of
genetic diversity that contains the building blocks required for
plant breeding and thus constitutes the basis of all food and
agricultural production in the world. Plant genetic diversity
is probably more important for farming than any other
environmental factor, simply because it is what enables farmers
to adapt to changing environmental conditions, such as climate
change. There are many ways of storing seeds, one of which is
through community seed banks.
Community seed banks are collections of seeds that are
maintained and administered by the communities themselves.
Seeds can be stored by a community either in large quantity
to ensure that planting material is available, or in small
samples to ensure that genetic material is available should
varieties become endangered. As one researcher has put it:
The aim [of seed banks] is to increase local seed security and
contributing to the possibilities to continued utilisation of
locally important genetic diversity.2
The work of small scale farmers with community seed banks
is often integrated in broader programmes on agricultural
biodiversity, that also have aspects of rural community
development, including strengthening farmers’ organisation
and development of sustainable agricultural production
systems3. When the community decides to establish and
manage a seed bank, the community members will start a
process of being organised. A robust local community, both
in terms of locally adapted seeds, diversity of crops and
strengthened local institutions, has better chance of adapting to
changing conditions such as climate change.
1 Niels Louwaars (et al) (2009): “The future of plant breeding in the light of develop-ments
of in patent rights and plant breeders’ rights”, CGN Report 2009-14 (EN).
2 Conny Almekinders (2001): “Management of Crop Genetic Diversity at Community
Level”, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)
3 See e.g. Lossau, Annette von, and Qingsong Li (Eds., 2011): "Sourcebook on
Sustainable Agrobioidiversity Management", Social Sciences Academic Press (P.R.
China)
However, in different communities farmers face challenges as
how to best organise around community seed banks in order
to maintain their livelihoods. This report links community
seed banks to the implementation of Farmers’ Rights to crop
genetic diversity, before looking into different experiences
with community seed banks in 9 countries in Africa, Asia and
Central America, and makes some policy recommendations to
circumvent common challenges of community seed banks.
Seed diversity and conservation strategies
Community seed banks provide an important supplement to
formal or official crop conservation strategies. During the peak
of the Green Revolution in the 1960s and 1970s, the formal
plant breeding research communities underestimated or even
overlooked the benefits of traditional farming practises. Much
emphasis on crop conservation and variety development was
given to the institutional technologies of formal breeding and
gene banks, known as ex situ (off-farm) conservation.
Ex situ conservation of genetic diversity, meaning the storage
of seeds in freezers in gene banks is a well-established and
recognised method for maintaining these important resources.
The Global Seed Vault at Svalbard, which opened in 2008, is
providing backup storages to the gene banks from around the
world. But this kind of ex situ conservation has its limitations.
Access for farmers is limited, the frozen seeds do not evolve, and
the knowledge and culture of seed management may be lost.
Community seed banks are also ex situ systems, but they have the
advantage of giving easy access to farmers, and is easy to link to
constant on-farm conservation. In situ or on-farm conservation
where farmers actively maintain diversity in their fields is crucial
in order to continue the dynamic evolutionary process of local
genetic diversity and its associated knowledge and culture.
Furthermore, farmers maintain the control over their seeds.
Despite efforts of conserving plant genetic diversity, the Food
and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)
estimates that 75 % of crop diversity was lost between 1900 and
2000. One of the most important4 reason for the loss of seeds,
and thereby the loss of genetic diversity, is the replacement of
genetically diverse farmers’ varieties (traditional varieties) with
modern varieties (improved varieties). Modern varieties are
products of formal plant breeding systems and give higher yields
when cultivated under favourable conditions with the necessary
inputs like chemical fertilisers and pesticides. Farmers’ varieties,
on the other hand, are products of careful and extensive selection
by farmers: They are part of informal seed systems where farmers
acquire seeds by saving them on his or her own farm or from
other farmers who have done so. This strategy relies on the skills
of farmers in maintaining, enriching and utilising crop diversity.
The main selection criteria used are yield and yield stability, risk
avoidance, low dependency on external inputs when selecting
crops under low-input conditions, and a range of quality factors
associated with storage, cooking characteristics and taste. In
contrast, the formal breeding system has a more narrow focus on
4 FAO (2010): "The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources
for Food and Agriculture", Rome

5
yield increase. Besides, modern varieties are genetically distinct
from each other, uniform and stable (i.e. they fulfil the so called
DUS criteria of formal breeding: distinct, uniform and stable).
Chapter II: Linking community seed
banks and Farmers’ Rights
Regine Andersen5 and Tone Winge6
Basically, realising Farmers’ Rights means enabling farmers
to maintain and develop their crop genetic resources as they
have done since the dawn of agriculture and recognising and
rewarding them for this indispensable contribution to the
global pool of genetic resources. The realisation of Farmers’
Rights is a precondition for the maintenance of crop genetic
diversity, which is the basis of all food and agricultural
production in the world. Since farmers are the custodians and
developers of crop genetic resources in the field, their rights in
this regard are crucial for enabling them to continue this role.
For this reason, Farmers’ Rights constitute a cornerstone in
the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food
and Agriculture, or the Plant Treaty. This treaty aims at the
conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources,
5 Dr. Regine Andersen is senior research fellow at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute and
director of the Farmers’ Rights Project (www.farmersrights.org).
6 Tone Winge is research fellow at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, working for the
Farmers’ Rights Project.
Community seed bank in India. Photo: Green Foundation
their accessibility, and the sharing of benefits arising from
their use.
Parties to the Plant Treaty recognise the enormous
contributions that farmers have made, and will continue to
make, in conserving and developing plant genetic diversity,
and in making this diversity available. According to the Plant
Treaty, the responsibility for realising Farmers’ Rights rests
with the national governments. The governments are free to
choose measures according to their own needs and priorities.
Measures suggested in the Plant Treaty include protecting
and promoting traditional knowledge relevant to crop
genetic resources, enabling farmers to participate equitably
in the sharing of benefits arising from the utilisation of such
resources, as well as in national decision making on related
matters. Furthermore, the treaty addresses the rights that
farmers have to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seed
and propagating material. We will have a closer look at these
components of Farmers’ Rights.
Components of Farmers’ Rights
Protecting traditional knowledge first and foremost means
taking measures to halt this knowledge from disappearing.
This can be done by collecting and documenting the
remaining knowledge, sharing it to ensure continued use,
teaching it to the younger generations, and encouraging its
use. In some countries, stakeholders are concerned about
protecting traditional knowledge from misappropriation.
There are several examples of how this can be done while at
the same time ensuring that the knowledge can be shared, for
example in the form of catalogues.

6
Benefit sharing is aimed at rewarding farmers who conserve
and sustainably use crop genetic resources for their
contribution to the global genetic pool. In other words: It is
not limited to farmers who provide plant genetic resources
to commercial breeding. The main instrument of the Plant
Treaty to ensure benefit sharing is the Multilateral System of
Access and Benefit Sharing. This system ensures facilitated
access to crop genetic resources of specified species that are
under the parties’ control and within the public domain. A
Benefit Sharing Fund is part of the Multilateral System and
is distributing funds to projects in developing countries that
support farmers in the conservation and sustainable use of
crop genetic resources.
Participation in decision-making related to plant genetic
resources is about farmers’ participation in the development
and the implementation of legislation, agricultural policies
and programmes, as well as capacity building in this regard.
Ensuring the rights to save, use, exchange and sell seed is the
basis for enabling farmers to further conserve and develop
crop genetic diversity. These rights represent the very
practices required for farmers’ contribution to the global
genetic pool. Among the laws and legislation that relate to
this right are variety release and seed marketing legislation,
as well as intellectual property laws (on plant variety
protection and patents).
How community seed banks may promote
Farmers’ Rights
Community seed banks contribute towards the realisation
of Farmers’ Rights in several ways7. First of all, they ensure
diversified seed supply that is adapted to the growing
conditions in the communities and the preferences of
their inhabitants. Through their focus on maintaining and
using local varieties, community seed banks help to protect
traditional knowledge. Such knowledge survives when it is
kept alive and practiced, and when farmers have easy access
to seed from local varieties. Access is particularly crucial
when traditional knowledge is in danger of disappearing, as is
the case in many farming communities around the world. In
some cases, community seed banks may even choose to focus
on documentation of traditional knowledge along with seed
storage. Such documentation is a good basis for awareness
raising regarding the value of genetic diversity, as well as for
wider sharing and participatory breeding of new varieties.
Documentation is also a means to avoid misappropriation by
preventing others from getting intellectual property rights to
the plant genetic resources.
Moreover, community seed banks make farmers less
dependent on seed supply from sources outside the
communities. They therefore give farmers greater choice
among the varieties and seed they deem most appropriate.
Self-sufficiency in seed often boosts the self-confidence
7 See also research of the Farmers’ Rights Project at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute
(www.farmersrights.org),
of farmers and fuels empowerment, which in its turn is
important for participation in decision making.
In addition, community seed banks may contribute greatly
to the sharing of seeds among farmers, and thus to boosting
their rights to save, use and exchange farm-saved seed.
The degree to which they do so depends on how they are
organised. Is the community seed bank a membership-based
entity or in the public domain of the community? Can other
farmers than those involved in the community seed bank
receive seed samples from it? And at what conditions? This
differs among different community seed banks.
Some banks cooperate with agricultural colleges and
universities to document the collections, control the quality
of seeds and multiply the most interesting varieties so that
greater quanta can be distributed to each interested farmer.
This also contributes to realising Farmers’ Rights.
Often community seed banks have been initiated by non-governmental
organisations (NGOs) or intergovernmental
organisations (IGO). Such projects can be regarded as a type
of benefit sharing, which targets farmers who contribute to
the conservation and further development of plant genetic
diversity. Functioning as a seed reserve for farmers when
crop failure has destroyed their ability to use farm-saved seed,
community seed banks improve the food security of farmers.
They also provide an important basis for farmers to develop
new varieties of crops, thereby improving their prospects for
better livelihoods. As such, community seed banks serve as
very concrete measures to ensure that farmers participate in
benefit sharing.
However, so far such projects have only reached a limited
number of farmers. To have a real impact for the farmers
who serve as custodians of crop genetic resources, scaling up
is required. No country has so far managed to scale up such
activities to a national level. In most countries, agricultural
extension services would probably provide the best
institutional infrastructure to get started. Through capacity
building in matters of crop genetic diversity, the establishment
and use of community seed banks and nation-wide sharing
of experiences, extension service officers could learn how to
support communities. NGOs and IGOs with experience from
community seed banks elsewhere could provide the capacity
building, help setting up strategies and support with advice.
Evaluating on-going community seed bank projects could
provide important input to strategies and plans. And farmers
from communities with seed banks could help conveying the
knowledge and serve as examples to farming communities
considering to set up such banks.
With regard to funding for such scaling up, the Benefit
Sharing Fund of the Plant Treaty would be one relevant source
for developing countries. Development cooperation agencies
involved in the conservation and sustainable use of crop
genetic diversity are another potential source.

7
Chapter III: Making a case of
local experiences
Community seed banks have been set up in many countries.
Here is a short visit to some in Bangladesh, Costa Rica,
Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Nepal, Thailand, Zambia and
Zimbabwe.
Sustainable agriculture secures Bangladesh’s
seed future
The formal seed system only covers about 20% of the seed
requirements in Bangladesh.8 The rest has to be covered by
the informal seed system, which is challenged by floods and
cyclones that destroy crops. The private research organisation
UBINIG established a community seed wealth centre to
address the problem of loss of crop genetic diversity and
secure farmers’ access to locally adapted seeds. Locally,
UBINIG works with the movement Nayakrishi Andolon (New
Agricultural Movement of Bangladesh). Their philosophy
calls for changes in life style by practicing biodiversity-based
ecological agriculture with no use of pesticides, minimal
use of chemical fertilisers and careful use of ground water.
UBINIG has set up several seed huts, which in principle
functions as community seed banks.
According to Nayakrishi Andolon, seed conservation is an
art belonging to women. Women’s Seed Networks are bodies
of autodidact and experienced women who provide technical
capacity building to the community, give information to the
seed wealth centre and take part in meetings. Both the centre
itself and the management committee in each seed hut are run
by women.
The seed network of 3000 farmers in the districts where
Nayakrishi Andolon operates emphasises indigenous
practices of seed maintenance. UBINIG has no mid or long
term seed conservation system. The seeds are stored for
limited periods in the houses of farmers, in their seed huts or
at the seed wealth centre. Thus, UBINIG has to regenerate its
seeds every year.
Any member of the movement can collect seeds from the
seed huts if they promise to deposit double the quantity they
received when the harvest is finished. The seeds are sold to
other farmers of the village, and the cost of the seed huts is
maintained from the income. All varieties are registered and
a database of varieties is being maintained at each seed wealth
centre and also centrally at UBINIG.
8 C. K. Saha (2009): “Case Study Report on Community Based Management of
Community Seed Wealth Center”, Development Fund
Management among farmers is based on collective decisions
and information sharing. This is to ensure that, in every
planting season, all available varieties at farmer’s households
are planted and seeds collected and conserved for the next
season. Diversity is always encouraged as long as it does not
become an economic stress on the farmer. Seed exchange
is encouraged and this is mainly done through the women’s
seeds. The relation between Bangladesh’s National Gene Bank
and the community seed wealth centre is just starting to be
examined. UBINIG has received 1500 rice varieties from the
Bangladesh Research Institute which are now maintained in
the community seed wealth centres. In addition, Nayakrishi
Andolon sometimes receives technical support from, and
collaborates with public research institutions.
Farmers as seed producers in Costa Rica
Many farmers in Costa Rica are organised in associations
of producers. These units provide their members with an
integral agricultural package and help them improve their
income through multiplication of seeds. Both the collection
of local seeds and the multiplication process in farmer’s fields
are done by researchers in close collaboration with seed
committees consisting of farmers. In addition, the National
Institute of Innovation and Agrarian Technology Transfer
transfers materials and in some cases the National Producers
Commission (CNP) reproduces seed.
The local materials collected are stored, developed and
validated in research stations by scientists and farmers, based
on seed committees’ records of what materials are used and
where they come from. Committees are also responsible for
choosing breeding strategies. At present, striving for higher
yields to satisfy the demands of the market has a higher
priority than keeping diversity in farmers’ field.
The national Costa Rican partner in the regional Participatory
Plant Breeding Programme in Mesoamerica (PPB-MA)
purchased a cold chamber at the end of 2008 that will
function as a community seed bank for all the neighbouring
producers’ associations . But as of February 2011, the
community seed bank is still not fully operational, due to
lack of funds. Furthermore, opinion varies among farmers
as to which seeds should go into the community seed bank,
how this bank should be organised and what role should
be assigned to the seed committees. Overall, conservation
of seeds is at an early stage, since the main focus of the
associations is to reproduce seeds for marketing.

9
Bringing traditional varieties back to farmers
in Ethiopia
Ethiopia is regarded as a secondary centre for durum wheat
diversity. This diversity has been endangered due to the
introduction of modern varieties of wheat, as well as by
repeated droughts and unprecedented food crises in the
1970s and 1980s. To counter this development, researchers
from the national gene bank at the Institute of Biodiversity
Conservation (IBC) collected traditional varieties of durum
wheat from different agro-ecological zones. In addition to
this ex situ conservation, twelve community seed banks were
constructed in six different districts from 1994 to 20029.
The community seed banks aims at contributing to a
sustainable conservation strategy and supporting seed
exchange of traditional varieties among farmers. Banks are
managed by the local farmers, who use them to exchange
seeds of traditional varieties from diverse crops, such as
wheat, teff, barely, lentil, beans and chickpeas. Having
registered in crop conservation associations, farmers borrow
and return seeds from the community seed banks. As interest
on their seed loan, they are obliged to return more seeds than
they initially received, thereby helping to increase the banks’
seed stock.
One of the twelve seed banks is the Ejere Community Seed
Bank, situated in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Since 2001
it has been managed by an NGO called Ethio-Organic Seed
Association (EOSA) in collaboration with the IBC.
Through community seed banks, farmers’ varieties that had
been lost on farms were brought back from the national gene
bank at IBC. At the same time, samples of the remaining
diversity in farmers’ field were collected. Now, the community
seed bank in Ejere maintains about 90 accessions of durum
wheat out of which 50 are under screening. Each year, the
IBC undertakes renewal of this collection. EOSA, on its
part, works to increase the interest of the private sector in
agricultural products of traditional varieties for processing
and trade. EOSA also provides training and direct technical
support for farmers.
9 Severin Polreich (et al.) (2005): ”Assessing the Effectiveness of the Community-based
Seed Supply System for in Situ Conservation of Local Wheat Varieties”, paper
presented at the Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development,
Stuttgart-Hohenheim, October 11-13, 2005
Saving seeds in Honduras: relief when the
weather hits
In Honduras, as in most of the world, the commercial seed
system is generally not designed with the interests of small-scale
farmers in mind. The Honduran NGO Foundation for
Participatory Research with Honduran Farmers (FIPAH)
helps farmers organise community-wide research teams
known as Comités de Investigación Local (CIALs). These
farmer research teams identify the most pressing local
agricultural problems and find solutions, one of which is
the establishment of community seed banks. Here both
traditional varieties and varieties improved through
participatory plant breeding are stored.
Several CIALs have set up community seed banks to ensure
that the poorest farmers always have access to quality plant
materials. This helps to ensure that communities have a stable
supply of food. In 2000, FIPHA assisted the establishment
of one seed bank in the community of Santa Cruz in Yorito
in Northern Honduras. Initially, the community seed bank
focused on rescuing traditional varieties in the area. After
receiving training, the community also started to provide
seeds to its members.
During the flooding caused by a tropical storm in 2008,
farmers in Yorito lost approximately 90 present of their
maize and bean harvest. The stocked seeds in the bank were
immediately distributed to farmers and all farmers attached to
the community seed bank managed to plant again when the
storm stopped. The response was effective and no other relief
service came so quickly and directly to the farmers rescue.
According to former, local CIAL leader, the late Don Luis
Alonso, the inhabitants of Yorito were saved by its community
seed bank. “After the flood, we distributed seeds to our
members and other farmers in the community. Thus, we are
less dependent on support from outside,” said Alonso. This
contrasts with the situation in 1997, when hurricane Mitch hit
the country. Then farmers had to receive seeds from outside
without being familiar with their quality or characteristics.
“People considered it a miracle when
traditional varieties were brought back
to their door steps after having been
considered lost completely.”
Tadesse Reta (45), farmer and member
of Ejere Community Seed Bank
“Local varieties of wheat have low
productivity, but give us considerable
security since they withstand extreme
and unfavourable climatic conditions
and are less demanding in terms of
management and input requirement.
Their food preparation qualities are
superior and highly demanded for
specialty products such as local beer
production. Productivity of local
varieties, particularly in durum wheat,
needs to be improved.“
Getachew Admassu (52), farmer and member
of Ejere Community Seed Bank
Images opposite side:
1. Community seed bank in Rampur Dang, Nepal. Traditional seed
storage structure made of bamboo for storing tubers. Photo: LI-BIRD.
2. Rice management in Northern Thailand. Photo: CBDC-Nan.
3. Visitors learning from diversity block established by the community
seed bank of Kachorwa in Nepal. Photo: LI-BIRD

10
Meeting poor farmers’ needs in India
In India, resource poor farmers face the dilemma of procuring
expensive modern seeds with potentially higher yields or
keeping traditional varieties that are less vulnerable to pest
and disease and better adapted to varying climatic conditions.
If the crop is lost, it is difficult for them to pay back the loans
often obtained when buying modern varieties. Trying to
improve this situation, the NGO Green Foundation focuses
on strengthening community based biodiversity conservation.
Their aim is to protect the ecology and encourage the small
and marginal farmers to adopt sustainable agricultural
practices. Among other things, Green Foundation motivated
members of local Krushi self-help groups to establish
community seed banks in a selected cluster of villages.
Each community seed bank has members from four to seven
neighbouring villages. Self-help group members who are
interested in conservation take active part in managing the
seed banks. Green Foundation, on its part, trains farmers
in seed selection, storage by traditional methods and record
keeping and manages disbursals of seeds. Farmers receive
seeds from the bank in return for double the quantity after
the harvest. In times of crop failure, farmers compensate with
other varieties which they hold and return the seed the next
season.
Community sharing of information on seed varieties, storing
capacity, germination, crop yields and disease resistance
are crucial to enhance local knowledge of seed production.
Female members are showing particular deep interest
in saving and exchanging seeds, as well as in practicing
traditional pest control measures. At present, Green
Foundation facilitates nine functioning community seed
banks in the district of Ramanagaram in South India, each
providing 70-80 farmers with seeds every season. Farmers
contribute to conservation of the traditional varieties by
increasing the area under which the traditional varieties are
grown.
Green Foundation also has a back-up gene bank in case a
particular variety of seed is lost. The seeds are grown out
seasonally and field days are organised to show the diversity
within the gene bank. Researchers from the agriculture
university and extension department are invited to the field
days, where they share their expertise.
Increasing farmers’ income in Nepal
As part of a global on-farm crop conservation project in
Nepal, community seed banks have been established by the
Nepal Agriculture Research Council and the NGO Local
Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD).
The community seed bank in itself is managed by
Agriculture Development Community Society (ADCS), a
farmers’ organisation.
The seed bank deals with a variety of local seeds as well as
improved varieties. In addition, some rice varieties bred from
traditional varieties with the technical assistance of LI-BIRD
are included.
In collaboration with partner organisations ADCS collects,
regenerates, multiplies and promotes diversity on-farm.
The diversity and knowledge gathered through different
techniques, such as diversity fairs, biodiversity registration
and diversity blocks, have improved farmers’ access to seeds
of preferred varieties. To refresh seeds maintained in the seed
bank and meet local demands, seeds of the crop varieties are
regenerated each year.
2
1

11
The seed bank offers local people seeds of local origin as
well as preferred improved varieties, and it empowers the
community with respect to conservation, use and marketing.
Farmers and farmers groups frequently visit the seed bank
for technical input, facilitation of saving and credit schemes,
business advice and funding for small scale businesses. This
strongly suggests that ADCS is becoming a key institution
in the area. However, maintaining seed quality has been a
challenge for ADCS, as it lacks quality control mechanisms
and trained man power.
The most important lesson learned from the project is that
most crop varieties of local origin are maintained by wealthier
households. Poorer farmers use those varieties, but are unable
to invest resources for the sake of conservation for future
use. In this situation, the community seed bank can maintain
varieties preferred by small scale farmers, who often operate
in marginal environments where local varieties are preferred.
The seed access provided by community seed banks therefore
directly improves the food security of small scale farmers.
ADCS has also established a diversity fund, which has
been effective in raising the incomes of small scale farmers,
including landless households. By accepting fund rules, those
who borrow from the diversity fund agree to be responsible
for the regeneration of one traditional variety. The fund
thus strengthens small scale businesses and contributes to
conservation of traditional varieties. Most of the diversity
fund loan takers have been resource poor farmers or people
from socially excluded and ethnic minorities.
Involving high school students in Thailand
In 2000, a seed bank was established in the mountainous
Nan Province in North Western Thailand to solve common
problems of insufficient seeds, poor seed quality and high
production costs. The Thung Kong Community Seed Bank
was initiated by Pin Kamsaen and her relatives. In her late 40s,
Pin was illiterate but enthusiastic about sharing her traditional
knowledge about seed saving and plant breeding. Staff from
the NGO Joko Learning Centre recognised her qualities and
gave Pin multiple training opportunities both locally and
abroad.
Thung Kong Community Seed Bank has successfully
integrated its activities into the local high school curriculum.
With active support from the school’s biology teacher, the
community seed bank benefits from the weekly contribution
in documentation and labour from Grade 11 students, as part
of their science curriculum. Students help with planting and
harvesting, as well as with recording properties of traditional
varieties and new seeds. Some attend the Farmers’ Field
School on Saturdays during the growing season to learn
additional techniques.
The establishment of Thung Kong community seed bank went
hand in hand with the establishment of Thung Kong Farmers’
Field School, initiated by Joko Learning Centre. The school
curriculum is matched to each rice growing season and taught
in an actual field. The on-farm research itself is taken up by
individual farmers, notably Pin. With her rice field located
next to the forest, Pin often discovers new genetic materials.
She cultivates these varieties into seeds for propagation.
Somkuan, treasurer at the community seed bank, breeds
selected varieties that are put up for sale as foundation seeds
to local buyers and other farmer networks.
Thung Kong Community Seed Bank receives some seed
supplies from rice research scientists, from the government
office in north-eastern Thailand and from universities in the
northern region. Joko Learning Centre’s technicians and rural
development workers provide support on pest management
and organic production techniques as well as advice on
management of community seed banks. The Thung Kong
Community Seed Bank also has a one-way relationship with
farmer-breeders in the region. Members collect new varieties
during study trips. In return, the seed bank serves as an
educational model and initial seed supply for other farmer
groups from across Thailand.
Distributing modern varieties in Zambia
Poor farmers in rural Zambia face problems in accessing
good quality seed when they need it. This has frequently led
to farmers doing their sowing late and consequently results
in poor harvests. To meet these challenges, the British/
Irish NGO Self Help Africa is working with seed grower
associations in Northern, Western and Eastern provinces of
Zambia, where community seed banks have been established.
However, like some seed companies, these community seed
banks rely on seed bred by the Zambian Agriculture Research
Institute rather than promoting local crops and varieties.
Thus, the community seed banks work as outlets of improved
varieties.
The trained members of the seed growers associations
participate in seed multiplication. Members have to pay a
fee and are then allowed to buy shares in the association on
which interest is paid whenever it makes money from bulk
selling of modern varieties. However, seed companies and
traders take advantage of informal sector seed producers’ lack
of a readily available market for the seeds they produce, and
the insufficient training in marketing skills. Companies and
traders buy seeds from them at very low prices, repack the
same seeds with their logo on it and sell it at up to three or
four times the price.
1. Seeds bags in Ethiopia. Photo: Ashnan Films, Canada
2. Farmers from Western part of Nepal visiting community seed bank at
Kachorwa Bara, Nepal. Photo: LI-BIRD

13
There has been a general shift from using traditional varieties
because they are late maturing and low yielding compared to
improved varieties. This shift has been compounded by the
many programmes that promote modern varieties such as the
Farmer Input Support programme, which provides subsidised
hybrid seed and fertilisers. Even the community seed banks of
the seed growers associations tend to promote only the use of
improved varieties.
Seed fairs promote seed diversity in Zimbabwe
In 1991/1992 a severe drought contributed to genetic
erosion in Zimbabwe’s agriculture. As a response, the NGO
Community Technology Development Trust (CTDT)
set up community seed banks in close consultation with
communities. These were to provide back-up facilities for
farmers’ varieties, capture traditional knowledge and enable
farmers’ access to local seeds of reasonable quality.
One such bank is The Uzumba Maramba Pfungwe
Community Seed Bank, established in 1998. It is located
in a semi-arid area and serves four different administrative
areas. There are two rooms in the building constructed to
be relatively cool, maintaining a temperature ideal for seed
storage. Seeds brought to the bank undergo a thorough
cleaning process, to rid the seeds of pests and diseases.
Germination tests are conducted every two years to assess
seed viability. Seeds with low germination percentages are
regenerated.
The Uzumba Maramba Pfungwe Community Seed Bank is
managed by farmers. The community elects a management
committee responsible for the coordination and management
of all activities. Both CTDT and the government’s agricultural
extension services provide technical assistance and capacity
building to farmers. The National Gene Bank also collaborates
by providing materials and seeds to the bank as well as
technical management.
Collection and cleaning of seeds are done by individual
households and farmers who have been capacitated in seed
handling. Because of socio-economic and cultural norms
and values, women play an important role in communal
farming and are therefore largely contributing through seed
selection in the fields, cleaning and bringing seeds to the
community seed bank as well as participating at seed fairs.
Youth participation is minimal; only a few are engaged in
conservation bring their seeds to the bank. Many young
people are not interested in farming and many have moved to
cities looking for employment.
The community seed bank functions as a meeting place for
farmers to exchange information and local knowledge on crop
genetic diversity. In order to increase awareness, seed fairs
are conducted at the community seed bank every year and
at national level biannually. These fairs provide an additional
meeting forum for farmers. They also enable communities
to evaluate the level of diversity and to assess and monitor
genetic erosion.
Chapter IV: Arguing the case for
community seed banks
As can be seen from the previous chapter, different forms of
community seed banking practices are being promoted in
different countries. Some are highly specialised in collection,
regeneration, distribution and maintenance of local crop
diversity and documentation of associated information and
traditional knowledge. Others are engaged in production and
marketing of seeds of improved farmers’ varieties. The present
chapter sums up the lessons learned from the cases examined
and presents some current and future challenges.
Why are community seed banks established?
Most community seed banks in the presented case countries
have been established to combat seed insecurity. Such
insecurity is mainly due to drought causing crop failure
(e.g. in Ethiopia and Zambia), flood and cyclones (e.g. in
Bangladesh) and introduction of modern varieties and
policies promoting it through subsidies or by other means
(e.g. in India, Nepal, Thailand, and Zimbabwe). Modern
varieties are increasingly replacing traditional ones. They are
expensive for small scale farmers and hence inaccessible. In
addition, in the cases examined, introduced modern varieties
have not met local needs and thus have failed to adapt. This
failure is particularly evident in the case of irrigated and
paddy rice growing areas in India, Nepal and Thailand, as
well as in growing areas for maize in Zimbabwe and maize
and beans in Honduras. In the case of Zambia, focus on
traditional varieties is almost non-existent. Here, community
seed banks mainly provide improved varieties; the issue of
conservation is not taken into consideration in bank practice
and management.
In some countries (e.g. Costa Rica) the motivation behind
the seed bank is for marketing high quality seeds of improved
farmers’ varieties and modern varieties at community level.
This differs from the “traditional” goals of community seed
banks: addressing the challenges of seed insecurity in times
of shortage and human and nature induced calamities, in
addition to on-farm conservation of crop genetic diversity.
Who are involved?
Farmers are the primary stakeholders in the community seed
banks approach for management of agricultural biodiversity.
Their knowledge of agro ecosystems, crops and varieties, have
been central in the management of community seed banks.
Farmers have elected committees to manage the seed banks
(e.g. in Ethiopia), while in Costa Rica and Zambia farmers
were organised in seed producing associations.
1. Seeds at display in India. Photo: Green Foundation.
2. Seed storage in India. Photo: Green Foundation.
3. Traditional storing of rice seeds, taro cormel and potato tubers in
community seed bank in Gadariya, Nepal. Photo: LI-BIRD

15
All community seed banks in the case studies were initiated
or supported by NGOs. The NGOs played a useful role
in organising and training farmers in collaboration with
different national institutions. However, high reliance on
NGOs is a challenge for the sustainability of community
seed banks. This challenge seems to have been overcome
in Nepal, where farmers managing community seed banks
have established a community biodiversity management
fund, which is being used for conservation and development
of plant genetic resources and improving livelihoods of the
target group. Generally, community seed banks in many cases
have remained innovative demonstration examples. They
have not received the institutional support required for a
scaling-up that would make them part of larger strategies for
conserving crop genetic diversity.
In some cases, national gene banks have served as a source of
diversity in varieties for farmers managing community seed
banks. In some of the examined cases, gene banks restored
lost varieties to certain areas through farmers (Ethiopia).
In Zimbabwe, the national gene bank works in close
collaboration with the community seed bank by providing
materials for restoration of local varieties. Here, the national
gene bank also acts as a backup for varieties. However, in
most of the case countries there is a loose connection between
gene banks and community seed banks, that is, between ex
situ and on-farm conservation.
Agricultural research institutions are involved in training of
farmers in breeding, plant variety selection, seed production
and storage (e.g. in Nepal, Thailand and Costa Rica). They
provide farmers with pre-breeding materials for further
selection and seeds for multiplication. Furthermore, research
institutions are interested in using organised farmers as
outlets for distributing their varieties and even multiplying
them (e.g. in Zambia).
Sometimes governmental agricultural extension offices
collaborated with community seed banks to promote modern
varieties (e.g. Zambia). On the other hand, in Thailand and
Nepal, agricultural extension offices were used to promote
farmers’ varieties that were improved through Participatory
Plant Breeding and Participatory Variety Selection in addition
to modern varieties from the formal sector. Thus, the role of
agricultural extension in management of crop genetic diversity
varies, depending on the activities of the community seed
banks.
How do community seed banks work?
The operational modalities of the community seed banks
differ from country to country. In Ethiopia and Bangladesh,
members of community seed banks access seeds on loan
basis. The approach in this case is similar to micro credit
where seeds replace money. In these cases, farmers are pleased
with saving money on fertiliser that would be required if
they were planting modern varieties. Moreover, they get
access to the varieties they appreciate and have knowledge of.
The community seed banks are mostly managed by elected
committees.
Most community seed banks reach out also to non-member
farmers. For instance, farmers managing community seed
banks in Ethiopia, Nepal, India, Thailand and Zimbabwe are
selling seeds to non-members. This implies that community
seed banks, in addition to conserving and enhancing
traditional varieties, can be transformed into viable and self-sustained
seed business entities.
The case from Zambia shows that participating communities
were also engaged in multiplying seeds based on parent lines
of a very limited number of varieties given to them from
the country’s breeding stations. They have also assisted with
selling the multiplied seeds. The same documentation shows
that the Zambia Agricultural Research Institute has produced
some of the crop varieties for seed production by use of the
community seed banks. However, these variety development
activities did not fully involve farmers. Efforts were made to
collect local varieties for various crops under the community
seed banks programme in Zambia, but it did not manage to
distribute seeds to members for reproduction. Furthermore,
a seed company took advantage to peddle its varieties. In
this case, the idea of community seed banks seems to be
misunderstood by implementers.
Documented results
First and foremost, community seed banks improve farmers’
access to seeds. In most countries, the formal seed system
does not meet the needs of farmers either in terms of
quantity (e.g. in Bangladesh, it constitutes only about 20 %)
or quality with its narrow focus on modern varieties – or at
a cost affordable to poor farmers. Most of community seed
banks distribute to members and non-members alike. In
India and Nepal, access to seeds for resource poor farmers
has been given particular attention. In Honduras and
Bangladesh, community seed banks improved access to
seeds after harvest loss. Due to the prioritising of modern
varieties by government programmes, farmers’ varieties are
not distributed in the formal seed system. Community seed
banks can therefore be a tool for farmers to access traditional
varieties (e.g. in Nepal, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, India and
Ethiopia), but also improved varieties. Thus, community seed
banks function as locally accessible ex situ conservation of
crop genetic diversity.
Traditional knowledge is documented and shared among
members of community seed banks. This is especially valuable
in situations where the farmers’ varieties are disappearing
but the traditional knowledge can be used to promote its
rehabilitation. In Thailand, traditional knowledge is also
reaching younger generations by being integrated in the high
school curriculum.
Empowerment of farmers is an important outcome of the
establishment of community seed banks. This indicates that
farmers have got the necessary skill and knowledge in seed
selection, breeding, seed production and role of diversity of
crops and their varieties in farming. Community seed banks
promoted bulk selling of produce and allowed for its members
to be trained in local seed production and management.
They also improved farming systems (e.g. in Thailand, Costa
Rica and Nepal). Through methods like Participatory Plant
1. Seed sacks and germplasm reserve in Ejere community seed bank in
Ethiopia. Photo: EOSA
2. Traditional seed storage structure made of bamboo and mud, Nepal.
Photo: LI-BIRD
3. Rice display in Northern Thailand. Photo: CBDC-Nan

16
Breeding (PPB), Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS), crop
rotation and crop diversification, community seed banking
helped increase productivity and household food security, and
improved nutrition. This kind of farming also demonstrates
sustainable agricultural practises.
In economic terms, banking contributed to increased
disposable income from the sale of surplus seed and produce
for farmers’ groups. In Ethiopia and India, for instance, such
income has been used to meet various household needs,
including acquisition of assets and agriculture inputs, and
starting up small business enterprises. More generally, the
affiliated farmers regard the seed multiplication through
community seed banks as an opportunity to generate income
(e.g. Zambia and Costa Rica). This is so because seed for
the next planting season can be stored in proper conditions
and still have good yields and germination. As an additional
benefit, if a variety is not requested by the market its seed can
be saved for more advantageous market conditions. In fact,
community seed bank projects are more likely to succeed if
seed marketing is included.
Overall, the commitment of women in farmer groups
managing community seed banks outweighed that of men.
Home garden fruits and vegetable varieties managed by
women helped farmers understand the importance and value
of diverse seeds of vegetables required for different growing
seasons (e.g. in India and Bangladesh). Female members of
community seed banks are showing deep interest in saving
and exchanging seeds for purposes like household nutrition
and cultural uses of certain crops. Their knowledge of seed
storage, aptitude for nurturing with patience and ability to
save seeds for future seasons often make women better than
men at managing seed banks. Female farmers practice several
pest control measures while saving seeds.
Many farmers cultivate both modern and traditional
varieties. They try commercial varieties without necessarily
discarding their own. That’s when ideas of combining the
better of the two worlds through participatory plant breeding
came up. If farmers grow ‘low-yielding’ farmers’ varieties,
it is usually because those varieties are the best under local
circumstances or because of specific merits that are missing
in the commercial ‘high-yielding’ varieties. If the community
seed bank networks involve themselves in participatory plant
breeding they would usually try to combine the high yield
potential of commercial varieties with the attractive traits in
their own local varieties.
Challenges
Community seed banks still face many challenges. Among
them are: lack of markets for farmers’ varieties; inadequate
capacity and knowledge in marketing seeds; inadequate
storage facilities; lack of manpower during peak seasons;
insufficient seed quality; late distribution of seeds and late
payments for the seeds loaned, as well as high dependence
on NGOs or a few dedicated farmers. The different farming
committees running the seed banks meet these challenges in
different ways.
Challenge number one, however, is at a higher level than
what can be solved at community level alone: Governments’
agricultural policies prioritise high yields through
intensification (increased use of modern varieties and
intensification of agricultural inputs). Both research and
government extension services are focused on improved
varieties in combination with chemical fertilisers and
pesticides. Training and orientation of development/
extension agents is also geared towards the implementation
of accelerated productivity and growth strategies, with
little or no relevance to the conservation and utilisation
of local genetic diversity due to lack of understanding
and appreciation. There is also the danger of creating the
impression among farmers that their traditional varieties
are inferior and this may contribute to erosion of genetic
resources and loss of related traditional knowledge.
Farmers also want high yields, but high-yield technology
packages may be difficult to adopt for economic reasons, for
lack of agro-ecological adaptation (they do not fit farmers
marginal land), or for having other negative impacts like
harming the environment. Care should therefore be taken not
to miss the target group (seed insecure poor farmers) and the
banks’ “traditional” objectives of conservation.
Today, countries lack legal frameworks and institutional
support to community seed banking. They also uphold
restrictive laws, such as seed certification based on the criteria
in the formal seed system of distinct, uniform and stable. As
a result, farmers cannot market branded seeds coming out of
their efforts. This situation threatens the sustainability of the
seed banking concept itself. Under current legal and policy
regimes, it is hard for farmers through community seed
banking to combine modern and traditional seeds as they
prefer.
In cases where traditional varieties are not so attractive for
local farming communities any longer, it is not the sole
responsibility of farmers managing community seed banks to
conserve them. The next chapter looks at steps needed to be
taken in order to up-scale community seed banks.
1. Rice seeds, Nepal. Photo: LI-BIRD
2. Conservation of traditional varieties, Ethiopia. Photo: EOSA
3. Rice and finger millet seeds, Nepal. Photo: LI-BIRD
4. Inside the community seed bank in Kachorwa, Bara, Nepal. Photo:
LI-BIRD

18
Chapter V: Up-scaling community
seed banks to implement Farmers’
Rights and towards a sustainable
future for agriculture
To fully reap the benefits of community seed banks in
enhancing farmers’ access and control of seeds, as well as their
contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of crop
genetic diversity, we will end this report with a set of policy
recommendations.
Governments should:
ÁÁ Establish and/or support community seed
banks as part of their obligations to implement
Farmers’ Rights and other provisions of the
Plant Treaty, such as sustainable use and
conservation of crop genetic diversity. Parties
should support the up-scaling of community
seed banks in order to reach as many farmers
as possible, especially in marginalised areas.
ÁÁ Integrate community seed banks in broader
programmes on agricultural biodiversity,
where the local seed banks should serve as a
storing place for results of participatory plant
breeding and participatory variety selection,
and make such results accessible to farmers.
Seed banks should also be venues for seed
fairs for farmers to exchange and display their
seed diversity.
ÁÁ Include community seed banks in
governments’ agricultural development
strategies as a vehicle for adaptation to
climate variability. Agricultural extension
services would provide the best institutional
infrastructure to embark on a scaling up of
local seed bank experiences to a national
level.
ÁÁ Revise seed regulations and provisions on
intellectual property rights to seeds to ensure
Farmers’ Rights to save, use, exchange and sell
farm-saved seeds.
ÁÁ Redirect public subsidies from promoting
modern varieties to fund the above mentioned
activities.
1. Maize and bean seeds in Honduras. Photo: Development Fund
2. Communuty seed bank in Rampur Dang, Nepal. Traditional seed
storage structure made of mud. Photo: LI-BIRD.
1
2

19
Agricultural Research Institutions should:
ÁÁ Ensure that farmers are given an informed
choice between traditional and modern
varieties. Extension services and government
agricultural policies should be reviewed as
to ensure this balance. There is a need to
democratise agricultural extension systems
so that it provides all kinds of information (e.g.
about the role of formal and informal seed
systems) in a transparent way without putting
farmers’ varieties to a disadvantage.
ÁÁ Extend their expertise and services for free to
assist and support communities and NGOs in
setting up and maintaining community seed
banks. Their assistance and support should be
based on the actual needs and capacities
of the communities and local organisations
seeking their expertise.
ÁÁ Facilitate the access of communities and
NGOs setting up community seed banks to
other in situ as well as ex situ sources of seeds,
if necessary and when required. They should
help provide linkages among communities
engaged in community seed banking and
relevant institutions and organisations that may
be able to support such efforts. Community
seed banks are the bridge between in situ and
ex situ conservation. Through them, national
gene banks should make their acquisitions
available to farmers.
Commercial seed sector should:
ÁÁ Contribute to the Benefit Sharing Fund of the
Plant Treaty, which in its turn should make
sure that sufficient funds for supporting
community seed banks are in place. The cost
of conserving crop genetic diversity should
not be borne by resource poor farmers in the
Global South, but be shared by all who benefit
from the commercialisation of this diversity.
ÁÁ Multiply and produce farmers’ varieties for
increased availability of locally adapted
seeds.
NGOs should:
ÁÁ Adopt a mechanism to share their skills and
knowledge in establishing and maintaining
community seed banks to interested
communities, farmers’ organisations and
other NGOs in and around the countries
where they are based. The main role of NGOs
is to promote community seed banks until
governments have incorporated such banks in
their formal systems like agricultural extension
services.
ÁÁ Strengthen community based management
of agricultural biodiversity and avoid using
community seed banks for promoting only
modern varieties.
“All States should: Support and scale-up local seed exchange systems such as community seed banks and
seed fairs, community registers of peasant varieties, and use them as a tool to improve the situation of the
most vulnerable groups,..”
Mr Olivier De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, speaking
at the 64th session of the UN General Assembly (October 2009)

Banking for the Future: Savings, Security and Seeds

Banking for the Future: Savings, Security and Seeds

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Banking for the Future: Savings, Security and Seeds (20)

More from Seeds (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Banking for the Future: Savings, Security and Seeds