DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
10 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASH I NGTON, OC 20301 -1010	 JUL 3 1 2013
MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE
DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGEMENT OFFICER
COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS
ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE
GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION
DIRECTOR, COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
ASSISTANTS TO THE SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE
DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
DIRECTOR, NET ASSESSMENT
DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES
DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES
SUBJECT: 20% Headquarters Reductions
Secretary Hagel has direetcd a 20% cut in management headquarters spending throughout
the Department of Defense (DoD). The cuts, which will take place regardless of the budget
levels approved by Congress, are designed to streamline DoD's management through efficiencies
and elimination of lower-priority activities. This memorandum defines the nature of these
important reductions more specifically.
The headquarters cuts will apply to all higher headquarters staffs including Office of the
Secretary of Defense Principal Staff Assistants (PSAs) and their associated Defense Agency
staffs, Joint Staff, Service Secretary staffs, Service Chief staffs, Service 4-star major commands
and Service component commands, lower level Service staffs (down to the appropriate level
detennined by the Service Secretaries and Chiefs), and Combatant Command staffs. Intelligence
staffs will also be affected (primarily Military Intelligence Program-ftmded Intelligence Centers
and, with the concurrence of the Director for National Intelligence, National Intelligence
Program-ftmded centers).
Service Secretaries and Chiefs will decide the allocation of cuts among various
organizations within their headquarters staffs. The Chainnan of the Joint Chiefs will make the
same allocation for the Joint Staff. Each PSA and Defense Agency should achieve a 20%
reduction. If necessary, I will consider reallocations during prograin review.
to
OSDO08519-13
The 20% cut applies to the total headquarters budgets. Total headquarters budgets include
govemment civilian personnel who work at headquarters and associated costs including contract
services, facilities, information technology, and others that support headquarters functions.
Budgets are those specified in the Future Years Defense Program supporting the President's
budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014, extended to FY 2019 assuming growth for inflation. The 20%
cut applies to budget dollars. However, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent
reductions in authorized govemment civilian staff at their headquarters. Similarly, while military
personnel are not part of headquarters budgets, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent
reductions in military personnel billets on headquarters staffs. Finally, subordinate headquarters
should not grow as a result of reductions in higher headquarters. I will be reviewing proposals to
ensure that these various goals are met.
I recognize that the FY 2014 budget reflects past efficiency decisions, some of which
affected headquarters. This 20% reduction represents an additional cut, which I know will be
challenging. However, in this period of additional downward pressure on defense spending, we
must continue to reduce our headquarters budgets and staffing. Components are encouraged to
suggest changes in policies and workload that would help them accommodate these dollar and
staff reductions.
Senior managers should ensure that cuts are made aggressively and as soon as possible,
both to eliminate uncertainty for our employees and contractors and to maximize savings.
Generally, cuts should be roughly proportional by year — with about one fifth of the cut in FY
2015, another fifth in FY 2016, and so on. Components are free to implement reductions more
rapidly. To the extent feasible, some cuts should begin in FY 2014 in order to increase savings
and reduce the cuts required in later years.
Reduction plans should be submitted along with the Program Objective Memorandum
submissions, which are due on September 23.

More Related Content

PDF
CBO Briefing on the Federal Budget Dec 4 2013
PDF
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
PDF
Presentation on the Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2014 to 2023
PDF
Presentation on CBO’s Projections of the Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2014 t...
PDF
Prospects For DoD's Budget Over The Next Decade
PPTX
Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2015 to 2024
PDF
Analysis of Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on Military Compensation
PDF
Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on the Defense Health System
CBO Briefing on the Federal Budget Dec 4 2013
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
Presentation on the Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2014 to 2023
Presentation on CBO’s Projections of the Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2014 t...
Prospects For DoD's Budget Over The Next Decade
Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2015 to 2024
Analysis of Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on Military Compensation
Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on the Defense Health System

What's hot (20)

PDF
CBO Report on Long-term Implications of FY 14 Program November 2013
PDF
Presentation to the Budget Conference Committee
PDF
CBO Report on Military Budget Options March 2013
PDF
OMB Letter to Congress regarding Sequestration
PDF
Approaches to Reducing Federal Spending on National Defense
PDF
Transportation Finance Proposals in the 113th Congress and Their Budgetary Im...
PDF
Press Briefing on The Budget and Economic Outlook
PDF
Charts from CBO's testimony on Confronting the Nation's Fiscal Policy Challenges
PPT
Federal Budget Making
PDF
Prospects for DoD’s Budget Over the Next Decade
PDF
Overseas Contingency Operations: Trends and Issues
PDF
Updated Projections for the Federal Budget and the Economy
PDF
CBO’s Updated Budget Outlook
PDF
Analysis of Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on Military Health Care
PDF
Pismo o namerama Vlade R.Srbije MMF februar 2015 (eng)
PDF
Shifting Priorities in the Federal Budget
PDF
CBO’s Role in the Congressional Budget Process
DOC
PDF
The Budgetary Treatment of Federal Financing Instruments
PDF
CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlook: 2017 to 2027
CBO Report on Long-term Implications of FY 14 Program November 2013
Presentation to the Budget Conference Committee
CBO Report on Military Budget Options March 2013
OMB Letter to Congress regarding Sequestration
Approaches to Reducing Federal Spending on National Defense
Transportation Finance Proposals in the 113th Congress and Their Budgetary Im...
Press Briefing on The Budget and Economic Outlook
Charts from CBO's testimony on Confronting the Nation's Fiscal Policy Challenges
Federal Budget Making
Prospects for DoD’s Budget Over the Next Decade
Overseas Contingency Operations: Trends and Issues
Updated Projections for the Federal Budget and the Economy
CBO’s Updated Budget Outlook
Analysis of Approaches to Reduce Federal Spending on Military Health Care
Pismo o namerama Vlade R.Srbije MMF februar 2015 (eng)
Shifting Priorities in the Federal Budget
CBO’s Role in the Congressional Budget Process
The Budgetary Treatment of Federal Financing Instruments
CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlook: 2017 to 2027
Ad

Similar to Ashton Carter 20% Headquarters Management Reduction Memo 31 July 2013 (8)

PDF
SECDEF Budget Preview - Prepared Remarks Feb 24, 2014
PDF
7 furlough memo sd may 14
PDF
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
PDF
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel's Six Focus Areas
PDF
Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request
PDF
NewsBlast May 15, 2013
PDF
Defense Budget Priorities and Choices FY 14 PB
SECDEF Budget Preview - Prepared Remarks Feb 24, 2014
7 furlough memo sd may 14
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel's Six Focus Areas
Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request
NewsBlast May 15, 2013
Defense Budget Priorities and Choices FY 14 PB
Ad

More from Tom "Blad" Lindblad (20)

PDF
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
PDF
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems Factbook
PDF
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
PDF
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
PDF
Updated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
PDF
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
PDF
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review
PDF
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
PDF
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
PDF
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
PDF
DOD 2015 China Military Power Report
PDF
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)
PDF
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
PDF
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
PDF
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
PDF
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
PDF
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
PDF
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
PDF
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
PDF
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems Factbook
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
Updated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
DOD 2015 China Military Power Report
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
CIVIL-SOCIETY-AND-NON-GOVERNMENTAL-ORGANIZATIONS.pptx
PPTX
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Announces Sweeping Reforms.pptx
PPTX
political economy meaning and importance.pptx
PPTX
Examining_the_Potential_Relocation_of_Gazans_to_So.pptx
PDF
Lipulekh Pass Despite Nepal’s Objection.pdf
PPTX
Syrian ongoing Civil War it's origi s and effects.pptx
DOC
了解UVM毕业证学历认证,迪拉徳大学毕业证仿制文凭证书
PPTX
Is Thailand Ready for Candela’s Eco-Friendly Hydrofoil Ferry_.
PPTX
Challenges, strengths and prospects of Pakistan in.pptx
PPTX
British Colonialism in the Subcontinent.pptx
PPTX
Taimour Zaman Fraud and Josue Daniel Ortiz Borjas..pptx
PPTX
Apna Punjab Media: The Definitive Punjabi Source
PDF
SOLUTIONS TO THE GEOPOLITICAL SECURITY THREATS.pdf
PDF
FIRANGI_ZARBZAN_AND_RUM_DASTURI_THE_OTTO.pdf
PDF
ITF Capital Partners LLP Fraud And Carlos Gustavo Luna Scam.pdf
PDF
GAZA STRIP: Famine confirmed in Gaza Governorate, projected to expand
PPTX
Vietnam’s Ambassador Cruise II Takes Out Two National Records.
PPTX
Flood Disaster in Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
DOC
哪里买MCAD毕业证学历认证,加利福尼亚州立理工大学洪堡分校毕业证成绩单图片
PPTX
Bruce Green and Muhammad Yoefikar.pptx new 2025
CIVIL-SOCIETY-AND-NON-GOVERNMENTAL-ORGANIZATIONS.pptx
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Announces Sweeping Reforms.pptx
political economy meaning and importance.pptx
Examining_the_Potential_Relocation_of_Gazans_to_So.pptx
Lipulekh Pass Despite Nepal’s Objection.pdf
Syrian ongoing Civil War it's origi s and effects.pptx
了解UVM毕业证学历认证,迪拉徳大学毕业证仿制文凭证书
Is Thailand Ready for Candela’s Eco-Friendly Hydrofoil Ferry_.
Challenges, strengths and prospects of Pakistan in.pptx
British Colonialism in the Subcontinent.pptx
Taimour Zaman Fraud and Josue Daniel Ortiz Borjas..pptx
Apna Punjab Media: The Definitive Punjabi Source
SOLUTIONS TO THE GEOPOLITICAL SECURITY THREATS.pdf
FIRANGI_ZARBZAN_AND_RUM_DASTURI_THE_OTTO.pdf
ITF Capital Partners LLP Fraud And Carlos Gustavo Luna Scam.pdf
GAZA STRIP: Famine confirmed in Gaza Governorate, projected to expand
Vietnam’s Ambassador Cruise II Takes Out Two National Records.
Flood Disaster in Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
哪里买MCAD毕业证学历认证,加利福尼亚州立理工大学洪堡分校毕业证成绩单图片
Bruce Green and Muhammad Yoefikar.pptx new 2025

Ashton Carter 20% Headquarters Management Reduction Memo 31 July 2013

  • 1. DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 10 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASH I NGTON, OC 20301 -1010 JUL 3 1 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGEMENT OFFICER COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION DIRECTOR, COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ASSISTANTS TO THE SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, NET ASSESSMENT DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES SUBJECT: 20% Headquarters Reductions Secretary Hagel has direetcd a 20% cut in management headquarters spending throughout the Department of Defense (DoD). The cuts, which will take place regardless of the budget levels approved by Congress, are designed to streamline DoD's management through efficiencies and elimination of lower-priority activities. This memorandum defines the nature of these important reductions more specifically. The headquarters cuts will apply to all higher headquarters staffs including Office of the Secretary of Defense Principal Staff Assistants (PSAs) and their associated Defense Agency staffs, Joint Staff, Service Secretary staffs, Service Chief staffs, Service 4-star major commands and Service component commands, lower level Service staffs (down to the appropriate level detennined by the Service Secretaries and Chiefs), and Combatant Command staffs. Intelligence staffs will also be affected (primarily Military Intelligence Program-ftmded Intelligence Centers and, with the concurrence of the Director for National Intelligence, National Intelligence Program-ftmded centers). Service Secretaries and Chiefs will decide the allocation of cuts among various organizations within their headquarters staffs. The Chainnan of the Joint Chiefs will make the same allocation for the Joint Staff. Each PSA and Defense Agency should achieve a 20% reduction. If necessary, I will consider reallocations during prograin review. to OSDO08519-13
  • 2. The 20% cut applies to the total headquarters budgets. Total headquarters budgets include govemment civilian personnel who work at headquarters and associated costs including contract services, facilities, information technology, and others that support headquarters functions. Budgets are those specified in the Future Years Defense Program supporting the President's budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014, extended to FY 2019 assuming growth for inflation. The 20% cut applies to budget dollars. However, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent reductions in authorized govemment civilian staff at their headquarters. Similarly, while military personnel are not part of headquarters budgets, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent reductions in military personnel billets on headquarters staffs. Finally, subordinate headquarters should not grow as a result of reductions in higher headquarters. I will be reviewing proposals to ensure that these various goals are met. I recognize that the FY 2014 budget reflects past efficiency decisions, some of which affected headquarters. This 20% reduction represents an additional cut, which I know will be challenging. However, in this period of additional downward pressure on defense spending, we must continue to reduce our headquarters budgets and staffing. Components are encouraged to suggest changes in policies and workload that would help them accommodate these dollar and staff reductions. Senior managers should ensure that cuts are made aggressively and as soon as possible, both to eliminate uncertainty for our employees and contractors and to maximize savings. Generally, cuts should be roughly proportional by year — with about one fifth of the cut in FY 2015, another fifth in FY 2016, and so on. Components are free to implement reductions more rapidly. To the extent feasible, some cuts should begin in FY 2014 in order to increase savings and reduce the cuts required in later years. Reduction plans should be submitted along with the Program Objective Memorandum submissions, which are due on September 23.