blob: 8d95be398535b8cbcd802a23574758eeb232ff3e [file] [log] [blame] [view]
maruel9e198a82016-08-11 15:32:191# git-cl
2
3The git-cl README describes the git-cl command set. This document describes how
4code review and git work together in general, intended for people familiar with
5git but unfamiliar with the code review process supported by Rietveld and
6Gerrit.
7
8
maruel9e198a82016-08-11 15:32:199## Basic interaction with git
10
11The fundamental problem you encounter when you try to mix git and code review is
12that with git it's nice to commit code locally, while during a code review
13you're often requested to change something about your code. There are a few
14different ways you can handle this workflow with git:
15
161. Rewriting a single commit. Say the origin commit is O, and you commit your
17 initial work in a commit A, making your history like O--A. After review
qyearsley274c1592016-09-05 00:16:1918 comments, you `git commit --amend`, effectively erasing A and making a new
19 commit A', so history is now O--A'. (Equivalently, you can use
20 `git reset --soft` or `git rebase -i`.)
maruel9e198a82016-08-11 15:32:19212. Writing follow-up commits. Initial work is again in A, and after review
22 comments, you write a new commit B so your history looks like O--A--B. When
23 you upload the revised patch, you upload the diff of O..B, not A..B; you
24 always upload the full diff of what you're proposing to change.
25
26The Rietveld patch uploader just takes arguments to `git diff`, so either of the
27above workflows work fine. If all you want to do is upload a patch, you can use
28the upload.py provided by Rietveld with arguments like this:
29
30 upload.py --server server.com <args to "git diff">
31
32The first time you upload, it creates a new issue; for follow-ups on the same
33issue, you need to provide the issue number:
34
35 upload.py --server server.com --issue 1234 <args to "git diff">
36
37
38## git-cl to the rescue
39
40git-cl simplifies the above in the following ways:
41
421. `git cl config` puts a persistent --server setting in your .git/config.
432. The first time you upload an issue, the issue number is associated with the
44 current *branch*. If you upload again, it will upload on the same issue.
45 (Note that this association is tied to a branch, not a commit, which means
46 you need a separate branch per review.)
473. If your branch is _tracking_ (in the `git checkout --track` sense) another
Josip Sokcevic9c0dc302020-11-20 18:41:2548 one (like origin/main), calls to `git cl upload` will diff against that
maruel9e198a82016-08-11 15:32:1949 branch by default. (You can still pass arguments to `git diff` on the
50 command line, if necessary.)
51
52In the common case, this means that calling simply `git cl upload` will always
53upload the correct diff to the correct place.
54
55
56## Patch series
57
58The above is all you need to know for working on a single patch.
59
60Things get much more complicated when you have a series of commits that you want
61to get reviewed. Say your history looks like O--A--B--C. If you want to upload
62that as a single review, everything works just as above.
63
64But what if you upload each of A, B, and C as separate reviews? What if you
65then need to change A?
66
qyearsley274c1592016-09-05 00:16:19671. One option is rewriting history: write a new commit A', then use
68 `git rebase -i` to insert that diff in as O--A--A'--B--C as well as squash
69 it. This is sometimes not possible if B and C have touched some lines
70 affected by A'.
maruel9e198a82016-08-11 15:32:19712. Another option, and the one espoused by software like topgit, is for you to
72 have separate branches for A, B, and C, and after writing A' you merge it
73 into each of those branches. (topgit automates this merging process.) This
74 is also what is recommended by git-cl, which likes having different branch
75 identifiers to hang the issue number off of. Your history ends up looking
76 like:
77
78 O---A---B---C
79 \ \ \
80 A'--B'--C'
81
82 Which is ugly, but it accurately tracks the real history of your work, can be
83 thrown away at the end by committing A+A' as a single `squash` commit.
84
85In practice, this comes up pretty rarely. Suggestions for better workflows are
86welcome.
tandriie594e212016-08-22 21:18:0287
qyearsley274c1592016-09-05 00:16:1988## Bash auto completion
tandriie594e212016-08-22 21:18:0289
901. Ensure that your base git commands are autocompleted
91[doc](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Basics-Tips-and-Tricks).
922. Add this to your .bashrc:
qyearsley274c1592016-09-05 00:16:1993
tandriie594e212016-08-22 21:18:0294 # The next line enables bash completion for git cl.
95 if [ -f "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh" ]; then
96 . "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh"
97 fi
qyearsley274c1592016-09-05 00:16:1998
tandriie594e212016-08-22 21:18:02993. Profit.