| # git-cl |
| |
| The git-cl README describes the git-cl command set. This document describes how |
| code review and git work together in general, intended for people familiar with |
| git but unfamiliar with the code review process supported by Rietveld and |
| Gerrit. |
| |
| |
| ## Basic interaction with git |
| |
| The fundamental problem you encounter when you try to mix git and code review is |
| that with git it's nice to commit code locally, while during a code review |
| you're often requested to change something about your code. There are a few |
| different ways you can handle this workflow with git: |
| |
| 1. Rewriting a single commit. Say the origin commit is O, and you commit your |
| initial work in a commit A, making your history like O--A. After review |
| comments, you `git commit --amend`, effectively erasing A and making a new |
| commit A', so history is now O--A'. (Equivalently, you can use |
| `git reset --soft` or `git rebase -i`.) |
| 2. Writing follow-up commits. Initial work is again in A, and after review |
| comments, you write a new commit B so your history looks like O--A--B. When |
| you upload the revised patch, you upload the diff of O..B, not A..B; you |
| always upload the full diff of what you're proposing to change. |
| |
| The Rietveld patch uploader just takes arguments to `git diff`, so either of the |
| above workflows work fine. If all you want to do is upload a patch, you can use |
| the upload.py provided by Rietveld with arguments like this: |
| |
| upload.py --server server.com <args to "git diff"> |
| |
| The first time you upload, it creates a new issue; for follow-ups on the same |
| issue, you need to provide the issue number: |
| |
| upload.py --server server.com --issue 1234 <args to "git diff"> |
| |
| |
| ## git-cl to the rescue |
| |
| git-cl simplifies the above in the following ways: |
| |
| 1. `git cl config` puts a persistent --server setting in your .git/config. |
| 2. The first time you upload an issue, the issue number is associated with the |
| current *branch*. If you upload again, it will upload on the same issue. |
| (Note that this association is tied to a branch, not a commit, which means |
| you need a separate branch per review.) |
| 3. If your branch is _tracking_ (in the `git checkout --track` sense) another |
| one (like origin/main), calls to `git cl upload` will diff against that |
| branch by default. (You can still pass arguments to `git diff` on the |
| command line, if necessary.) |
| |
| In the common case, this means that calling simply `git cl upload` will always |
| upload the correct diff to the correct place. |
| |
| |
| ## Patch series |
| |
| The above is all you need to know for working on a single patch. |
| |
| Things get much more complicated when you have a series of commits that you want |
| to get reviewed. Say your history looks like O--A--B--C. If you want to upload |
| that as a single review, everything works just as above. |
| |
| But what if you upload each of A, B, and C as separate reviews? What if you |
| then need to change A? |
| |
| 1. One option is rewriting history: write a new commit A', then use |
| `git rebase -i` to insert that diff in as O--A--A'--B--C as well as squash |
| it. This is sometimes not possible if B and C have touched some lines |
| affected by A'. |
| 2. Another option, and the one espoused by software like topgit, is for you to |
| have separate branches for A, B, and C, and after writing A' you merge it |
| into each of those branches. (topgit automates this merging process.) This |
| is also what is recommended by git-cl, which likes having different branch |
| identifiers to hang the issue number off of. Your history ends up looking |
| like: |
| |
| O---A---B---C |
| \ \ \ |
| A'--B'--C' |
| |
| Which is ugly, but it accurately tracks the real history of your work, can be |
| thrown away at the end by committing A+A' as a single `squash` commit. |
| |
| In practice, this comes up pretty rarely. Suggestions for better workflows are |
| welcome. |
| |
| ## Bash auto completion |
| |
| 1. Ensure that your base git commands are autocompleted |
| [doc](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Basics-Tips-and-Tricks). |
| 2. Add this to your .bashrc: |
| |
| # The next line enables bash completion for git cl. |
| if [ -f "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh" ]; then |
| . "$HOME/bin/depot_tools/git_cl_completion.sh" |
| fi |
| |
| 3. Profit. |