Module-5 PPT
Module-5 PPT
✓ It is not a Design
Application Forms
A list of important forms is mentioned below.
Famous Case Law
Apple Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics
Co.
In 2011, Apple Inc. filed a case against
Samsung Electronics Co. in the United
States District Court for infringing their
Designs and Utility Patents of the user
interface like screen app grid and tap to
zoom.
As evidence, Apple Inc. submitted the side-
by-side image comparison of the iPhone
3GS and the i9000 Galaxy S to
demonstrate the alleged similarities in
both models.
However, later it was found that the images
were tempered by the Apple Company to
match the dimensions and features of the
controversial Designs.
So the counsel for Samsung Electronics
blamed Apple of submitting false and
misleading evidence to the court and the
company countersued the Apple
Company in South Korea; Tokyo, Japan;
and Mannheim, Germany, United States
District Court for the District of
Delaware, and with the United States
International Trade Commission (ITC)
in Washington D.C.
The proceedings continued for the 7 years
in various courts. In June 2018 both
companies reached for a settlement and
Samsung was ordered to pay $539
million to Apple Inc. for infringing on its
patents.
◼ In 2011, Apple sued Samsung, claiming that
Samsung copied the designs and features of
the iPhone, such as the app grid and tap-to-
zoom feature. To support this, Apple showed
side-by-side images of an iPhone and a
Samsung phone (the Galaxy S) to highlight the
similarities.
◼ However, Samsung argued that Apple had
altered the images to make the phones look
more similar than they actually were. Samsung
accused Apple of presenting misleading
evidence and counter-sued Apple in several
countries, including South Korea, Japan, and
Germany.
◼ The legal battle went on for seven years across
various courts. Finally, in 2018, the companies
reached a settlement, with Samsung agreeing
to pay Apple $539 million for infringing on its
patents.
Geographical Indications
◼ In every country, there are certain
regions famous for their traditional
knowledge/heritage in various sectors,
such as agriculture, food products,
textiles, etc.
◼ People from far-off places used to travel
to buy these products.
◼ With the passage of time, a specific link
between the goods produced and
geographical location evolved, resulting
in the growth of Geographical
Indications (GI).
◼ A GI is defined as a sign which can be
used on products belonging to a
particular geographical location/region
and possesses qualities or a reputation
associated with that region.
◼ In GI, there is a strong link between the
product and its original place of
production.
Acts, Laws and Rules
Pertaining to GI
◼ In India, GI was introduced in 2003 and
is governed under the Geographical
Indications of Act, 1999‘ and the
Geographical Indications of Goods
(Registration & Protection) Rules, 2002.
Ownership of GI
◼ The ownership/holders of GI (registered)
can be of the producers, as a
group/association/ cooperative society or
association or in certain cases,
government.
Rights Granted to the Holders
✓ Right to grant the license to others - The
holder has the right to gift, sell,
transfer/grant a license, or enter into any
other arrangement for consideration
regarding their product.
✓ Right to sue - The holder of GI has the right
to use and take legal action against a person
who uses the product without his consent.
✓ Right to exploit - The holder of GI can
authorize users with exclusive right to use
goods for which the GI is registered.
✓ Right to get reliefs - Registered proprietors
and authorized users have the right to obtain
relief concerning the violation of such GI
Registered GI in India
GI products registered in India belong to
the domains of handicrafts, agricultural,
food stuffs, alcoholic beverages, etc.
The first GI tag was granted in 2004 to
Darjeeling Tea and the latest being
Kashmir Saffron and Manipur Black rice
(Chakhao) in May 2020.
A total of 370 GI have been registered in
India till May 2020.
A few standout GI are mentioned in
table 1
Table 1 List of popular GIs registered in India
Identification of Registered GI
Registered GI products are granted a tag,
which is printed on the registered
products.
The tag confirms the genuineness of the
product in terms of its production (by set
standards) and location of production.
GI registered products can be
grown/produced in any part of the world
using standards laid down by the GI
Registry. However, these products
cannot be labelled as GI as they are not
produced/ manufactured in a specific
geographical location
Non-Registerable GI
✓ The use of which would be likely to
deceive or cause confusion.
✓ The use of which would be contrary to
any law.
✓ Which comprises or contains scandalous
or obscene matter.
✓ Which comprises or contains any matter
likely to hurt the sentiments of society.
✓ Religious susceptibilities of any class or
section of the citizens of India.
Procedure for GI Registration
◼ Once the prior search for registered GI is
done, the applicant has to file an
application.
◼ The application for GI can be forwarded
by an individual or an organization or
authority of people established under
Indian law.
◼ The application in a prescribed format is
submitted to the Registrar, Geographical
Indications along with the prescribed
fee.
◼ Once the application is filed at GI
Registry, the Examiner will scrutinize
the application for any deficiencies or
similarities.
◼ If the examiner finds any discrepancy, he
will communicate the same to the
applicant, which is to be replied within
one month of the communication of the
discrepancy.
◼ Once the examiner is satisfied with the
response/s, he files an examination
report and hands over the same to the
Registrar.
◼ After getting a green signal from the
Registrar, the application is published in
the official Geographical Indication
Journal for seeking any objections to the
claims mentioned in the application.
◼ If no opposition is received, the GI gets
registered by allotting the filing date as
the registration date. Initially, GI is
registered for ten years but is renewable
on the payment of the fee.
Figure 2: Flow chart for the process of GI registration.
Case study of Basmati patent
◼ In late 1997, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office granted a patent
to Ricetec Inc., the United States based
multinational company headquartered in
Alvin, Texas for a novel ‘grain’ also
known as ‘basmati’.
◼ The company claimed the protection of
new varieties of ‘basmati’ crops with
better qualities than the original crop.
◼ It has been using several versions of the
crop by selling it with the name
‘Jasmati’ or ‘Kasmati’ in the
international rice market.
The patent was granted to the company for
basmati rice grains.
Later, the patent was opposed by the Indian
NGOs like Research Foundation for
Science, Centre for Food Safety and
ultimately, Centre for Scientific and
Industrial Research too, objected to it.
The Indian sub-continent protected its
traditional crop basmati while Thailand
contested for the safeguarding of its
claim for jasmine rice.
In 2000, after examining evidence, the
Indian Government challenged the
patent claims by the company.
Case study of Neem Patent
The neem tree originates from the Indian
subcontinent and now grows in the dry
regions of more than 50 tropical
countries around the world.
The neem tree has multiple uses. It is
mentioned in Indian texts written over
2000 years ago and has been used for
centuries by local communities in
agriculture as an insect and pest
repellent, in human and veterinary
medicine.
The patent for Neem was first filed by
W.R. Grace and the Department of
Agriculture, USA in European Patent
Office. The said patent was deemed to
be a method of controlling fungi on
plants comprising of contacting the fungi
with a Neem oil formulation.
A legal opposition was filed by India
against the grant of the patent.
“It was pure and simple piracy. The oil
from neem has been used traditionally
by farmers to prevent fungus. It was
neither a novel idea nor was it invented.
It is the major victory that the appeal has
been dismissed.”
Case study of Curcuma (Turmeric)
Patent
In 1995, the United States awarded patent
on turmeric to University of Mississippi
medical centre for wound healing
property.
The claimed subject matter was the use of
"turmeric powder. The inventors in their
claims also described turmeric as a
yellow powder developed from the
rhizome of the plant Curcuma longa, is
widely used in food colouration mainly
in Indian cuisines.
A re-examination claim with USPTO was
file for the invalidation of patent
application no. 5401540 by the Indian
Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR) on October, 1996 as
the patent lacked the element of novelty
on the ground of healing power of
turmeric powder which was already
found and put into practice in India for
ages.
The patent was finally invalidated on the
ground of prior art since it was
evidently confirmed and established by
USPTO that the use of turmeric both in
the powdered and the paste form served
the same purpose. Therefore, the
traditional knowledge that belonged to
India was safeguarded in Turmeric case.
The withdrawal of the turmeric patent is
now seen as a first step in reversing
biopiracy.
Programme for Inspiring
Inventors and Innovators
✓ Promotion & Propagation of Inventions and
Innovations.
✓ Prize Award to Meritorious Inventions and
open-source Technologies.
✓ Innovate India Conference.
✓ Intellectual Property & Innovation
Facilitation.
✓ Intellectual Property and Technology
Facilitation Centre (IPFC).
✓ NRDC-University Facilitation Innovation
Centers.
✓ Patent Seminars, Patent Search.
✓ On-Line IPR & Knowledge
Management Courseware for
Certificate Programme.
✓ Technology Knowledge
Management Programme
Programme for Development of
Technology Inspiring for
Commercialization
✓ Digital Knowledge Base (Innovation Portal)
for Commercialization of Innovations.
✓ Basic Engineering Design Package.
✓ Market Survey on assigned technologies.
✓ Development Projects and value addition
for priority projects.
✓ Promotion of Innovation in Rural & North
East Region.
✓ Entrepreneurship Development Programme
in backward and rural areas through
Innovative Appropriate Technology.
✓ Organic Fruits Cultivation & Processing
Programme at Mizoram (MFCP Certified
Programme).
✓ Dissemination of Information through
R&D-Industry Meet, Conferences,
Seminars, Workshops, Exhibitions, Foreign
Exhibition, Publication, etc.