Scribd
Upload
23 views

Tutorial13 Basic TimeSeries PartD

This document provides an overview of testing for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in time series models using EViews. It discusses how to test for heteroskedasticity using the White test and for autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) using an ARCH LM test. It also demonstrates how to obtain robust standard errors using the Newey-West method to account for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation of unknown form.

Uploaded by

aksdlas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views

Tutorial13 Basic TimeSeries PartD

This document provides an overview of testing for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in time series models using EViews. It discusses how to test for heteroskedasticity using the White test and for autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) using an ARCH LM test. It also demonstrates how to obtain robust standard errors using the Newey-West method to account for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation of unknown form.

Uploaded by

aksdlas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

EViews Training

Basic Estimation: Time Series Models

Note: Data and workfiles for this tutorial are provided in:
Data: Data.xls
Results: Results.wf1
Practice Workfile: Data.wf1

Data and Workfile Documentation


Data.wf1 and Data.xls have monthly data from January 1960-December 2011.
M1 money supply, billions of USD (source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve)
IP industrial production, index levels (source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve)
Tbill 3-month US Treasury rate (source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve)
CPI Consumer Price Index, level (source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation


In Time Series

Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation


in Time Series
Nothing rules out the possibility that both heteroskedasticity and serial

correlation are present in a regression model.


Serial correlation has a larger impact on standard errors and efficiency of

estimators than heteroskedasticity


However, heteroskedasticity may be of concern especially in small samples.

In addition, in many financial time series, the conditional variance of the error

term depends on past values of the error term. This is also known as
autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH).
In this section, we demonstrate the following:
Testing for heteroskedasticity in time series models
Testing for ARCH terms
HAC standard errors

Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation


in Time Series (contd)
Testing for Heteroskedasticity in time series data is very similar to cross

section data*
The one caveat is that, when testing for heteroskedasticity, residuals should not

be serially correlated.
Any serial correlation will generally invalidate tests for heteroskedasticity.
It thus makes sense to test for serial correlation first, correct for serial correlation,
and then test for heteroskedasticity.
Most commonly, you can correct for both heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation
of unknown form using the HAC Consistent Covariance (Newey-West).

*Note: For heteroskedasticity test on cross-section data see tutorial on Basic Estimation.
5

Testing for Heteroskedasticity


in Time Series Models
Suppose you want to see whether

the regression shown here suffers


from heteroskedasticity.
Lets perform the White test.
Recall, the White test is a test of the null
hypothesis of no heteroskedasticity,
against heteroskedasticity of unknown,
general form.
*Note: The Appendix to this tutorial shows
that this regression does not suffer
from serial correlation.
*Note: This equation is saved as eq24
in Result.wf1 workfile.

Testing for Heteroskedasticity


in Time Series Models (contd)
White Test:
1. Open eq24 in Results.wf1 file. On the
top menu of the Equation box, select
View Residual Diagnostics
Heteroskedasticity Tests.
2. The Heteroskedasticity Tests window
opens up. Select White under the dropdown menu.
3. You may chose to include or exclude the
cross terms. If you do not wish to include
the cross term, uncheck the box Include
White cross terms (as we do here). The
test will simply be carried out with only
the squared terms.
4. Click OK.

Test Results (top panel) are shown here.


Based on the test statistics, we reject the

null of homoskedascity, which means that


the error term is heteroskedastic and
standard errors should be adjusted.
7

Testing for ARCH Terms


It is also possible that the previous

regression has ARCH terms.


To test for this, lets perform an ARCH LM test.
The null hypothesis is that there is no ARCH up
to order q in the residuals.
ARCH LM Test:
1. Click on eq24 to open it. On the equation box,
select View Residual Diagnostics
Heteroskedasticity Tests.
2. The Heteroskedasticity Tests window opens
up. Select ARCH under the drop-down menu.
3. Select the number of lags (4 in this case).
4. Click OK.

Testing for ARCH Terms (contd)


Test Results are shown here.
The top panel shows the results of the

ARCH LM test, while the bottom panel


shows the auxiliary regression used to
compute the test statistics.
We reject the null of no ARCH, which

means that residuals suffer from this


specific form of heteroskedasticity.

*Note: This output is saved as table08 in


Result.wf1 workfile.

Addressing Heteroskedasticity and


Autocorrelation: Robust Standard Errors
EViews provides built-in tools that allow you to adjust standard errors for the

presence of both heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation of unknown form


(HAC Newey-West).
HAC (Newey-West) standard errors:
1. Click eq24 to open it. Click

on the

equation box.
2. The Equation Estimation box opens up.
Click Options.
3. Under the Coefficient Covariance matrix
drop-down menu, choose HAC (NeweyWest).
4. Click OK.

10

Addressing Heteroskedasticity and


Autocorrelation: Robust Standard Errors

(contd)

EViews re-estimates the equation, this time adjusting the standard errors for

heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation of unknown form.


For purpose of comparisons, we also show results with unadjusted standard errors.
As expected, the estimated coefficient values do not change. But, the adjusted
standard errors (and associated t-statistics) are different from the original regression.

11

You might also like