Operating System and Computer Architecture In-Course Assignment
Operating System and Computer Architecture In-Course Assignment
Group Assignment
Intake :
Hand-Out Date :
Hand-in Date :
Lecturer :
Instructions:
This is a group assignment. You are to organize yourselves into groups of THREES (3).
The lecturer will later combine you into groups of six.
The group is to research and investigate TWO areas; Hardware and Software (Computer
Architecture and Operating System) of an information technology as it is used within a
context.
The goal of this assignment is to demonstrate knowledge and understanding in the specified
areas. The total word count of the report should range from 9,000 to 10,000 words (That is
approx. 3000 words for the group component and approx. 1000 words for each individual
component). No marks will be awarded for the entire assignment if any part is copied directly
from printed materials or from another student. All submissions should be made on or before
the due date. Any late submissions after the deadline will not be entertained. Zero (0) mark
will be awarded for late submission, unless extenuating circumstances are upheld.
2. Individual component:
A critical discussion to cover any SIX perspectives (one perspective for each
student) from the given list below:
User: (each member may select a different user from this category)
Describe the capabilities and benefits of the system from a selected type of
user’s perspective (Student, Engineer, Businessman etc.)
System Architect/Analyst
Discuss the Cost and Quality of the device in the context of bulk buying by a
company. Also discuss the Time to service the device or any of its
components.
System Administrator
Discuss the ease of installation and maintenance, availability and efficiency,
performance and security of the system as it would be maintained in an org.
Programmer
Discuss the tools available for writing programs for the selected device.
Environmental Sustainability
Discuss the environmental impact of the manufacture of computing
technology and possible ways in which to minimize the dangers thereof.
Socio-technical Issues
Discuss from a philosophical view, the impact computing technology has had
on human life.
TP No.
Topic Selected:
Timeline
Date Activity
Section A: Introduction 7th May
Section B: Hardware 21st May
Section C: Software (Operating System) 4th June
Individual Work 10th June
Final Submission of entire work 11 June
documentation.
Class Quiz
Total.
S2 (Name)
S3 (Name)
S4 (Name)
S5 (Name)
S6 (Name)
Minutes of Meeting
(See Link: https://www.wildapricot.com/articles/how-to-write-effective-meeting-minutes)
Call to order
A meeting of [Organization or team name] was held at [Location] on [Date].
Attendees
Attendees included [list attendee names].
Approval of minutes
[To replace any placeholder text (such as this) with your own, just select a line or paragraph
and type. For best results, don’t include space to the left or right of the characters in your
selection.]
Reports
[Need to add your own headings or more text? No problem. On the Home tab of the ribbon,
check out the Styles gallery to easily apply any text formatting you see in this document.]
Unfinished business
[Add your text here.]
New business
[Add your text here.]
Announcements
[Add your text here.]
Marking Criteria:
Distinction
Demonstrated comprehensive research with detailed evidence. High level of analysis
performed, exceptional and thorough knowledge and understanding displayed with regard to
facilities and services of the Operating System. Documentation presented in a professional
manner, without any spelling or grammar mistakes. Displayed evidence of critical appraisal.
Credit
Adequate research conducted with fair detail of evidence presented. Moderate level of
understanding, analysis and knowledge displayed. Good level of documentation presented.
Some level of reflection in the documentation. Moderate level of critical appraisal.
Pass
Low level research conducted. Some evidence of research displayed. Basic level of analysis,
knowledge and understanding displayed. Satisfactory level of documentation. Satisfactory or
low level of reflection displayed. Poor level of critical appraisal demonstrated.