Software Development

Life Cycle (SDLC)

“You’ve got to be very careful if you don’t
know where you’re going, because you might
not get there.”

Yogi Berra
 SDLC Model
A framework that describes the activities
performed at each stage of a software
development project.
Waterfall Model
• Requirements – defines
needed information, function,
behavior, performance and
interfaces.
• Design – data structures,
software architecture, interface
representations, algorithmic
details.
• Implementation – source
code, database, user
documentation, testing.
 Waterfall Strengths
• Easy to understand, easy to use
• Provides structure to inexperienced staff
• Milestones are well understood
• Sets requirements stability
• Works well when quality is more important than
cost or schedule
 Waterfall Deficiencies
• All requirements must be known upfront
• Deliverables created for each phase are
considered frozen – inhibits flexibility
• Does not reflect problem-solving nature of
software development – iterations of phases
• Integration is one big bang at the end
• Little opportunity for customer to preview the
system (until it may be too late)
 When to use the Waterfall Model
• Requirements are very well known
• Product definition is stable
• Technology is understood
• New version of an existing product
• Porting an existing product to a new platform.
V-Shaped SDLC Model
• A variant of the Waterfall
that emphasizes the
verification and validation
of the product.
• Testing of the product is
planned in parallel with a
corresponding phase of
development
 V-Shaped Steps
• Project and Requirements • Production, operation and
Planning – allocate resources maintenance – provide for
enhancement and corrections
• Product Requirements and • System and acceptance testing –
Specification Analysis – complete check the entire software system
specification of the software in its environment
system

• Architecture or High-Level Design • Integration and Testing – check

– defines how software functions that modules interconnect
fulfill the design correctly

• Detailed Design – develop • Unit testing – check that each

algorithms for each architectural module acts as expected
component
• Coding – transform algorithms
into software
 V-Shaped Strengths
• Emphasize planning for verification and
validation of the product in early stages of
product development
• Each deliverable must be testable
• Project management can track progress
by milestones
• Easy to use
 V-Shaped Weaknesses
• Does not easily handle concurrent events
• Does not handle iterations
• Does not easily handle dynamic changes
in requirements
• Does not contain risk analysis activities
 When to use the V-Shaped Model
• Excellent choice for systems requiring high
reliability – hospital patient control
applications
• All requirements are known up-front
• Solution and technology are known
Structured Evolutionary Prototyping
Model
• Developers build a prototype during the
requirements phase
• Prototype is evaluated by end users
• Users give corrective feedback
• Developers further refine the prototype
• When the user is satisfied, the prototype
code is brought up to the standards
needed for a final product.
Structured Evolutionary Prototyping
Steps
• A preliminary project plan is developed
• An partial high-level paper model is created
• The model is source for a partial requirements
specification
• A prototype is built with basic and critical attributes
• The designer builds
– the database
– user interface
– algorithmic functions
• The designer demonstrates the prototype, the user
evaluates for problems and suggests improvements.
• This loop continues until the user is satisfied
Structured Evolutionary Prototyping
Strengths
• The model helps the developer to understand the certain and uncertain
requirements of the customer.
• It helps the customer easily realize the required modification before the
final implementation of the system.
• The model reduces the efforts required in developing the final system. As
the developers develop the final system after all the specifications are
clear. So there are fewer chances of the final system being incorrect.
• The customer does not have to wait for a long to see the working model of
the final system.
• There are more chances of the developed system is more user-friendly.
• User satisfaction is achieved.
•
Structured Evolutionary Prototyping
Weaknesses
• The developers develop prototypes in an artificial
environment. So, it may happen that the customer
misunderstands an element of the system.
• Seeing the working model at an early stage may create a
misconception to the customer that the developers will deliver
the final product soon.
• Users are never satisfied as they are getting too many
opportunities to change specify the changes.
• Neither customer nor the developer is able to specify the
number of iterations.
Incremental SDLC Model
• Construct a partial
implementation of a total
system
• Then slowly add increased
functionality
• The incremental model
prioritizes requirements of the
system and then implements
them in groups.
• Each subsequent release of
the system adds function to
the previous release, until all
designed functionality has
been implemented.
 Incremental Model Strengths
• Develop high-risk or major functions first
• Each release delivers an operational product
• Customer can respond to each build
• Uses “divide and conquer” breakdown of tasks
• Initial product delivery is faster
• Customers get important functionality early
• Risk of changing requirements is reduced
Incremental Model Weaknesses
• Requires good planning and design
• Requires early definition of a complete and
fully functional system to allow for the
definition of increments
• Total cost of the complete system is not
lower
When to use the Incremental Model
• Risk, funding, schedule, program complexity, or
need for early realization of benefits.
• Most of the requirements are known up-front but
are expected to evolve over time
• A need to get basic functionality to the market
early
• On projects which have lengthy development
schedules
• On a project with new technology
Spiral SDLC Model
• Adds risk analysis,
• Each cycle involves
the same sequence of
steps as the waterfall
process model
 Spiral Quadrant
Determine objectives, alternatives and constraints

• Objectives: functionality, performance,

hardware/software interface, critical success factors, etc.
• Alternatives: build, reuse, buy, sub-contract, etc.
• Constraints: cost, schedule, interface, etc.
 Spiral Quadrant
Evaluate alternatives, identify and resolve risks

• Study alternatives relative to objectives and constraints

• Identify risks (lack of experience, new technology, tight
schedules, poor process, etc.
• Resolve risks (evaluate if money could be lost by
continuing system development
 Spiral Quadrant
Develop next-level product
• Typical activites:
– Create a design
– Review design
– Develop code
– Inspect code
– Test product
 Spiral Quadrant
Plan next phase
• Typical activities
– Develop project plan
– Develop configuration management plan
– Develop a test plan
– Develop an installation plan
 Spiral Model Strengths
• Provides early indication of insurmountable
risks, without much cost
• Users see the system early because of rapid
prototyping tools
• Critical high-risk functions are developed first
• Users can be closely tied to all lifecycle steps
• Early and frequent feedback from users
• Cumulative costs assessed frequently
 Spiral Model Weaknesses
• Time spent for evaluating risks too large for small or low-
risk projects
• Time spent planning, resetting objectives, doing risk
analysis and prototyping may be excessive
• The model is complex
• Risk assessment expertise is required
• Developers must be reassigned during non-development
phase activities
• May be hard to define objective, verifiable milestones
that indicate readiness to proceed through the next
iteration